December 19, Cal. Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 165 FERC 61,140 (2018) (November 19 Order).

Similar documents
December 18, Filing in Compliance with November 26, 2018 Order Docket No. ER

Docket No. ER April 2018 Informational Report Energy Imbalance Market Transition Period Report Powerex Canadian EIM Entity

Docket No. ER July 2018 Informational Report Energy Imbalance Market Transition Period Report Powerex Canadian EIM Entity

December 7, Compliance with Order No. 844 Response to Deficiency Letter

165 FERC 61,140 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ACCEPTING COMPLIANCE FILING SUBJECT TO CONDITION

March 7, The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) )

September 2, The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

June 9, Filing of CAISO Rate Schedule No. 92 Powerex EIM Implementation Agreement Docket No. ER

If there are any questions concerning this filing, please contact the undersigned.

August 24, The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

January 25, The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

August 16, Attachment 1 to the Formula Rate is the Formula Protocols, and Attachment 2 is the Formula Spreadsheet. 2

ALSTON&BIRD LLP The Atlantic Building 950 F Street, NW Washington, DC

ALSTON&BIRD LLP. The Atlantic Building 950 F Street, NW Washington, DC Fax:

March 28, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Attachment G MAXIMUM START-UP AND MINIMUM LOAD VALUES UNDER THE REGISTERED AND PROXY COST OPTIONS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

ALSTON&BIRD LLP. The Atlantic Building 950 F Street, NW Washington, DC Fax: August 6, 2008

2. The Start-Up Cost Curve - this is calculated using the following information:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) MOTION TO INTERVENE AND COMMENTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

March 13, Provisions, Docket No. ER (filed December 13, 2013) ( FCA 9 ORTP Filing ).

August 1, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

BY ELECTRONIC FILING Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.

Statement of the Nature, Reasons, and Basis for the Filing

April 11, Tariff Amendments to Increase Efficiency of Congestion Revenue Rights Auctions

June 5, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426

October 5, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20426

December 23, By etariff Filing Hon. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20426

California ISO. February 29, 2008

June 5, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426

March 25, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Pacific Gas and Electric Company ) Docket No.

Transmission Access Charge Informational Filing

April 29, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

150 FERC 61,056 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

May 8, Response to Show Cause Order, Filing of Revised Tariff Sheet And Request for Any Necessary Waivers. The Dayton Power and Light Company

RE: Southern California Edison Company s Formula Transmission Rate Annual Update Filing in Docket No. ER (TO11)

March 31, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426

April 29, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

July 15, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

April 29, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

Non-Conforming Negotiated Rate Agreement Update; El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.; Docket No. RP19-

American Electric Power Service Corporation Docket No. ER10- -

August 1, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Use of More Updated Gas Price Index for Mondays in Temporary Day-Ahead Market. White Paper

160 FERC 61,007 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Summary of Prior CAISO Filings and Commission Orders Concerning CAISO Market Redesign Efforts

150 FERC 61,116 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

November 29, RE: Southern California Edison Company s Formula Transmission Rate Annual Update Filing in Docket No. ER (TO2019)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Meridian Energy USA, Inc. ) Docket No. ER

October 8, The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.

September 10, Filing of CAISO Rate Schedule No. 80 and Request for CEII Treatment Docket No. ER

September 30, Part Version Title V LNG Rates

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1642 Houston, Texas September 1, 2011

January 17, via etariff

STATEMENT OF NATURE, REASONS AND BASIS

September 21, The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426

January 3, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA REPLY COMMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION

Steckman Ridge, LP, Docket No. RP

4.1 Daily & Hourly Bid Components

RE: Southern California Edison Company s Formula Transmission Rate Annual Update Filing in Docket No. ER (TO11)

May 18, Black Hills Power, Inc. Docket Nos. ER and EL Compliance Filing Revising Attachment H Formula Rate Protocols

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

March 19, MidAmerican Central California Transco, LLC Docket No. ER

PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. ( PJM ), under Section 205 of the Federal Power Act

Commitment Cost Enhancements Phase 3 Opportunity Cost Methodology. Technical Appendix

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Duke Energy South Bay, LLC ) Docket No. ER

Any questions regarding this filing should be directed to the undersigned at (402)

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Technical Bulletin Disconnected Pricing Node Process. Market Issue

Negotiated Rate Agreements Filing; El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.; Docket No. RP19-

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1642 Houston, TX

October 4, 2013 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

Entergy Services, Inc., Docket No. ER Informational Filing of Annual Transmission Formula Rate Update

RE: Revision to Southern California Edison Company s Formula Transmission Rate Annual Update in Docket No. ER (Amended TO8)

December 6, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C Attention: Ms. Kimberly D.

ISO filed a tariff amendment to implement the rates, terms, and conditions of the ISO s Reliability Coordinator Service

May 8, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

Rocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (JRS-1S) Docket No ER-15 Witness: Joelle R. Steward BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

January 22, Compliance Filing of Virginia Electric and Power Company Docket No. EL

March 26, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C Attention: Ms. Kimberly D.

Non-Conforming, Negotiated Rate Transportation Service Agreement Filing; El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.; Docket No. RP17-

Transcription:

California Independent System Operator Corporation The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20426 December 19, 2018 Re: California Independent System Operator Corporation Compliance Filing Docket No. ER18-1169- Dear Secretary Bose: The California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) 1 submits this filing in compliance with the Commission s Order Accepting Compliance Filing Subject to Condition, issued in the above-referenced proceeding on November 19, 2018. 2 On March 23, 2018, the CAISO filed proposed revisions to its tariff to implement its commitment cost enhancements phase 3 initiative (March 23 Tariff Amendment). Among other changes, the March 23 Tariff Amendment included revisions to implement a methodology to allow eligible use-limited resources to include opportunity cost adders in their commitment costs and energy bid costs based on eligible use limitations. 3 In its June 21 Order, the Commission accepted the tariff revisions, effective November 1, 2018 4 as requested by the CAISO, but ordered the CAISO to submit a compliance filing within 30 days to add details concerning the opportunity cost calculations. 5 On July 23, 2018, the CAISO submitted its compliance filing in response to the June 21 Order. In Its November 19 Order, the Commission accepted the July 23 compliance filing but directed the CAISO to submit a further compliance filing to add references to the specific gas price 1 References in this compliance filing to numbered sections are references to sections of the CAISO tariff as revised by this filing, unless otherwise indicated. 2 Cal. Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 165 FERC 61,140 (2018) (November 19 Order). 3 The March 23 Tariff Amendment set forth these revisions primarily in new tariff section 30.4.1.1.6. 4 Cal. Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 163 FERC 61, 211 (2018) (June 21 Order). Additionally, on August 31, 2018, the CAISO filed a petition for limited tariff waiver to delay implementation until April 1, 2019. On October 23, 2018, the Commission issued an order accepting the CAISO s petition. Cal. Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 165 FERC 61,038 (2018). 5 See June 21 Order at PP 32-34. www.caiso.com 250 Outcropping Way, Folsom, CA 95630 916.351.4400

The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose December 19, 2018 Page 2 indices used in calculating forecasted gas prices. The Commission directed the CAISO to submit a compliance filing within 30 days (i.e., by December 19, 2018). 6 To comply with the Commission s directives, the CAISO has is revising tariff section 30.4.1.1.6.2.2. Specifically, the CAISO is revising step (2) of the opportunity cost calculation methodology to add references to the gas price indices for the natural gas futures commodity price used to determine the forecasted gas prices. The CAISO is also adding a reference to the source for the wholesale future electric power price, which is also a component of the forecasted locational marginal prices. This component is referenced in both steps (2) and (3). The CAISO is proposing to substitute the term trading hub for the defined term Trading Hub, because Trading Hub refers to specific aggregated pricing nodes in the CAISO market. The term trading hub in the instant tariff language, on the other hand, refers to the wholesale future electric power price published in the Intercontinental Exchange. All other references to gas prices and greenhouse gas prices are calculated pursuant to existing tariff provisions. The CAISO added the specific tariff references as appropriate. In addition to this transmittal letter, this compliance filing includes attachments A and B. Attachment A contains clean CAISO tariff sheets reflecting the tariff revisions described above. Attachment B shows these revisions in redline format. If there are any questions regarding this filing, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Sidney L. Mannheim Roger E. Collanton General Counsel Sidney L. Mannheim Assistant General Counsel California Independent System Operator Corporation 250 Outcropping Way Folsom, CA 95630 Tel: (916) 608-7144 Fax: (916) 608-7222 E-mail: smannheim@caiso.com Counsel for the California Independent System Operator Corporation 6 See November 19 Order at P 11. www.caiso.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have served the foregoing document upon all of the parties listed on the official service list for the above-referenced proceeding, in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2010 of the Commission s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 C.F.R. 385.2010). Dated at Folsom, California, on this 19 th day of December, 2018. _/s/ Grace Clark Grace Clark

Attachment A Clean Tariff Commitment Cost Enhancements Phase 3 Compliance Filing California Independent System Operator Corporation

30.4.1.1.6.2.2 Methodology for Opportunity Cost Calculator For the Opportunity Cost calculator developed by the CAISO, each calculation of Opportunity Costs will equal the estimated profits foregone if the Use-Limited Resource had one fewer unit of starts, run-hours, or Energy output, whichever is applicable, in the future time period of the validated limitation. With regard to each validated limitation of the Use-Limited Resource, the calculation will take into account a margin set forth in the Business Practice Manual. The calculation will also take into account the effect of any validated limitation on a Use-Limited Resource s number of starts, number of run-hours, or Energy output in the monthly and annual and/or rolling twelve month periods. For MSG Transitions, the Opportunity Cost for each transition will be derivative of the number of Start-Ups required for the MSG Resource to achieve a specific MSG Configuration. The CAISO will calculate the estimated profits for each validated limitation over the future time period of the limitation based on the following estimated inputs: (a) the forecasted hourly average of fifteen-minute LMPs for Energy at the Use-Limited Resource s PNode or Aggregated PNode multiplied by (b) the optimal hourly dispatch of the Use-Limited Resource, minus (c) the estimated monthly Start-Up Cost of the Use-Limited Resource, minus (d) the estimated monthly Minimum Load Cost of the Use-Limited Resource, minus (e) the estimated monthly variable Energy cost of the Use-Limited Resource multiplied by the difference between (f) the optimal hourly commitment and dispatch of the Use-Limited Resource and (g) the PMin of the Use-Limited Resource, minus (h) the estimated monthly Transition Cost of the Use-Limited Resource. The CAISO will calculate input (a) listed above by executing the following steps in the order shown below: (1) For each future hour, calculate an hourly implied heat rate at each applicable PNode or Aggregated PNode for a Use-Limited Resource based on the hourly average of the fifteen-minute Real-Time LMPs (reflecting the gas price index used in the Real-Time Market calculated pursuant to Section 39.7.1.1.1.3) from the same hour of the previous year, the Greenhouse Gas Allowance Price, calculated pursuant to Section 39.7.1.1.1.4, from the same day of the previous year, and the gas price index of the applicable fuel region from the same day of the previous year. (2) For each future month, calculate a monthly future implied heat rate based on the 1

applicable wholesale future power price of the applicable power trading hub as published by Intercontinental Exchange, the most recent Greenhouse Gas Allowance Price calculated pursuant to Section 39.7.1.1.1.4, and the natural gas future commodity price of the applicable fuel region. The CAISO determines the natural gas futures commodity price by fuel region averaging available prices from the following vendors: Intercontinental Exchange, Natural Gas Intelligence, and SNL Energy/BTU s Daily Gas Wire. (3) For each future month, calculate a monthly historical implied heat rate based on the wholesale historic power price of the applicable power trading hub as published by Intercontinental Exchange for the same month of the previous year, the average Greenhouse Gas Allowance Price calculated pursuant to Section 39.7.1.1.1.4 for the same month of the previous year, and the average natural gas commodity price, reflecting the gas price index used in the Real-Time Market calculated pursuant to Section 39.7.1.1.1.3, of the applicable fuel region for the same month of the previous year. (4) For each future month, calculate a monthly power price conversion factor as the ratio of the future implied heat rate calculated under (2) above and the historical implied heat rate calculated under (3) above. (5) For each future hour, scale the hourly implied heat rate calculated under (1) above by the power price conversion factor calculated under (4) above. (6) For each future hour, calculate the LMPs by applying the gas price index of the future month and the most recent Greenhouse Gas Allowance Price calculated pursuant to Section 39.7.1.1.1.4 to the scaled implied heat rates calculated under (5) above. For a Use-Limited Resource that has twelve (12) or fewer months of LMP data at its PNode or Aggregated PNode, the CAISO will calculate input (a) listed above using LMP data from a comparable PNode or Aggregated PNode. Additional detail regarding the calculation of Opportunity Costs is provided in Appendix N to the Business Practice Manual for Market Instruments. Any dispute regarding the calculation of Opportunity Costs will 2

be subject to the CAISO ADR Procedures set forth in Section 13. 3

Attachment B Marked Tariff Commitment Cost Enhancements Phase 3 Compliance Filing California Independent System Operator Corporation

30.4.1.1.6.2.2 Methodology for Opportunity Cost Calculator For the Opportunity Cost calculator developed by the CAISO, each calculation of Opportunity Costs will equal the estimated profits foregone if the Use-Limited Resource had one fewer unit of starts, run-hours, or Energy output, whichever is applicable, in the future time period of the validated limitation. With regard to each validated limitation of the Use-Limited Resource, the calculation will take into account a margin set forth in the Business Practice Manual. The calculation will also take into account the effect of any validated limitation on a Use-Limited Resource s number of starts, number of run-hours, or Energy output in the monthly and annual and/or rolling twelve month periods. For MSG Transitions, the Opportunity Cost for each transition will be derivative of the number of Start-Ups required for the MSG Resource to achieve a specific MSG Configuration. The CAISO will calculate the estimated profits for each validated limitation over the future time period of the limitation based on the following estimated inputs: (a) the forecasted hourly average of fifteen-minute LMPs for Energy at the Use-Limited Resource s PNode or Aggregated PNode multiplied by (b) the optimal hourly dispatch of the Use-Limited Resource, minus (c) the estimated monthly Start-Up Cost of the Use-Limited Resource, minus (d) the estimated monthly Minimum Load Cost of the Use-Limited Resource, minus (e) the estimated monthly variable Energy cost of the Use-Limited Resource multiplied by the difference between (f) the optimal hourly commitment and dispatch of the Use-Limited Resource and (g) the PMin of the Use-Limited Resource, minus (h) the estimated monthly Transition Cost of the Use-Limited Resource. The CAISO will calculate input (a) listed above by executing the following steps in the order shown below: (1) For each future hour, calculate an hourly implied heat rate at each applicable PNode or Aggregated PNode for a Use-Limited Resource based on the hourly average of the fifteen-minute Real-Time LMPs (reflecting the gas price index used in the Real-Time Market calculated pursuant to Section 39.7.1.1.1.3) from the same hour of the previous year, the Greenhouse Gas Allowance Price, calculated pursuant to Section 39.7.1.1.1.4, from the same day of the previous year, and the gas price index of the applicable fuel region from the same day of the previous year. (2) For each future month, calculate a monthly future implied heat rate based on the 1

applicable wholesale future power price of the applicable power Ttrading Hhub as published by Intercontinental Exchange, the most recent Greenhouse Gas Allowance Price calculated pursuant to Section 39.7.1.1.1.4, and the natural gas future commodity price of the applicable fuel region. The CAISO determines the natural gas futures commodity price by fuel region averaging available prices from the following vendors: Intercontinental Exchange, Natural Gas Intelligence, and SNL Energy/BTU s Daily Gas Wire. (3) For each future month, calculate a monthly historical implied heat rate based on the wholesale historic power price of the applicable power Ttrading Hhub as published by Intercontinental Exchange for the same month of the previous year, the average Greenhouse Gas Allowance Price calculated pursuant to Section 39.7.1.1.1.4 for the same month of the previous year, and the average natural gas commodity price, reflecting the gas price index used in the Real-Time Market calculated pursuant to Section 39.7.1.1.1.3, of the applicable fuel region for the same month of the previous year. (4) For each future month, calculate a monthly power price conversion factor as the ratio of the future implied heat rate calculated under (2) above and the historical implied heat rate calculated under (3) above. (5) For each future hour, scale the hourly implied heat rate calculated under (1) above by the power price conversion factor calculated under (4) above. (6) For each future hour, calculate the LMPs by applying the gas price index of the future month and the most recent ggreenhouse ggas Allowance Pricecosts calculated pursuant to Section 39.7.1.1.1.4 to the scaled implied heat rates calculated under (5) above. For a Use-Limited Resource that has twelve (12) or fewer months of LMP data at its PNode or Aggregated PNode, the CAISO will calculate input (a) listed above using LMP data from a comparable PNode or Aggregated PNode. Additional detail regarding the calculation of Opportunity Costs is provided in Appendix N to the Business Practice Manual for Market Instruments. Any dispute regarding the calculation of Opportunity Costs will 2

be subject to the CAISO ADR Procedures set forth in Section 13. 3