PubPol/Econ 541. The Standard Model. Elaboration of diagrams in Krugman, Obstfeld & Melitz textbook. by Alan V. Deardorff University of Michigan 2016

Similar documents
PubPol/Econ 541. Behind the Standard Model. Essential Features of Ricardian and Heckscher-Ohlin Models

Problem Set #3 - Answers. Trade Models

Chapter 5. The Standard Trade Model. Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop

MTA-ECON3901 Fall 2009 Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson or Model

Midterm Exam No. 2 - Answers. July 30, 2003

Understand general-equilibrium relationships, such as the relationship between barriers to trade, and the domestic distribution of income.

Chapter 6. The Standard Trade Model

Specific Factors Model (2/1/2012) Econ

Lecture 12 International Trade. Noah Williams

Lesson 11: Specific-Factors Model (continued)

Examiners commentaries 2011

14.54 International Trade Lecture 3: Preferences and Demand

International Trade: Economics and Policy. LECTURE 5: Absolute vs. Comparative Advantages

MICROECONOMIC THEORY 1

The Ricardian Model. Rafael López-Monti Department of Economics George Washington University Summer 2015 (Econ 6280.

Specific factors and Income Distribution

Global Business Environment

1/25/2011. Introduction to International Trade. Basic Theory of Trade

POSSIBILITIES, PREFERENCES, AND CHOICES

CHAPTER 17 International Trade

Topic 3: The Standard Theory of Trade. Increasing opportunity costs. Community indifference curves.

ECON* International Trade Winter 2011 Instructor: Patrick Martin

8 POSSIBILITIES, PREFERENCES, AND CHOICES. Chapter. Key Concepts. The Budget Line

FINAL VERSION A Friday, March 24, 2006 Multiple choice - each worth 5 points

Ricardian Model part 1

ARE 202: Welfare: Tools and Applications Spring Lecture notes 03 Applications of Revealed Preferences

CHAPTER 2 FOUNDATIONS OF MODERN TRADE THEORY: COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE

Problem Set 4 - Answers. Specific Factors Models

Public Affairs 856 Trade, Competition, and Governance in a Global Economy Lecture 4 2/5/2018. Instructor: Prof. Menzie Chinn UW Madison Spring 2018

Preview. Chapter 5. Resources and Trade: The Heckscher-Ohlin Model

International Trade Glossary of terms

CHAPTER 2 FOUNDATIONS OF MODERN TRADE THEORY: COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE

ECON 442: Quantitative Trade Models. Jack Rossbach

Simon Fraser University Department of Economics. Econ342: International Trade. Final Examination. Instructor: N. Schmitt

Trade and Technology: The Ricardian Model

Econ 100B: Macroeconomic Analysis Fall 2008

Chapter 4. Specific Factors and Income Distribution

International Economics Lecture 2: The Ricardian Model

PubPol/Econ 541. Quota Analysis Partial Equilibrium. by Alan V. Deardorff University of Michigan 2016

Eco 300 Intermediate Micro

This assignment is due on Tuesday, September 15, at the beginning of class (or sooner).

14.54 International Trade Lecture 5: Exchange Economies (II) Welfare, Inequality, and Trade Imbalances

Public Affairs 856 Trade, Competition, and Governance in a Global Economy Lecture 6-7 2/12-2/14/2018

International Economics Fall 2011 Standard Trade Model. Paul Deng Sept. 15/20, 2011

Economics 181: International Trade Midterm Solutions

EconS Constrained Consumer Choice

Chapter 5. Resources and Trade: The Heckscher- Ohlin Model

Problem Set #3 - Answers Analysis of Trade Barriers. P w

Homework Assignment #1: Answer Sheet

Lecture 2: Ricardian Comparative Advantage

THEORETICAL TOOLS OF PUBLIC FINANCE

05/12/2011. Preview. Chapter 9. The Instruments of Trade Policy

Basic structure Supplements. Labor productivity and comparative advantages: The Ricardian Model. Robert Stehrer. Version: March 6, 2013

Topics in Trade: Slides

Problems. units of good b. Consumers consume a. The new budget line is depicted in the figure below. The economy continues to produce at point ( a1, b

160A: International Microeconomics Midterm 1: Professor Swenson October 17, Points VERSION A

Eastern Mediterranean University Faculty of Business and Economics Department of Economics Fall Semester. ECON 101 Mid term Exam

Test Review. Question 1. Answer 1. Question 2. Answer 2. Question 3. Econ 719 Test Review Test 1 Chapters 1,2,8,3,4,7,9. Nominal GDP.

Chapter 2 Commodity Trade

Preview. Chapter 9. The Instruments of Trade Policy

Prepared by Iordanis Petsas To Accompany. by Paul R. Krugman and Maurice Obstfeld

Chapter 4 Specific Factors and Income Distribution

CPT Section C General Economics Unit 2 Ms. Anita Sharma

Lecture 4: Consumer Choice

Topic 2 Part II: Extending the Theory of Consumer Behaviour

3/1/2016. Intermediate Microeconomics W3211. Lecture 4: Solving the Consumer s Problem. The Story So Far. Today s Aims. Solving the Consumer s Problem

The Standard Theory of International Trade

Chapter 7 Economic Growth and International Trade

2. David Ricardo's model explains trade based on: A) labor supply. B) technology. C) population. D) government control.

Trade theory has paid little attention to determinants of trade based on demand, specifically when consumption patterns vary between countries

Prepared by Iordanis Petsas To Accompany. by Paul R. Krugman and Maurice Obstfeld

File: Ch03; Chapter 3: The Standard Theory of International Trade

Consumer Choice and Demand

Midterm 2 - Solutions

Final Term Papers. Fall 2009 (Session 04) ECO401. (Group is not responsible for any solved content) Subscribe to VU SMS Alert Service

Endowment differences: The Heckscher-Ohlin model

Chapter 21: Theory of Consumer Choice

This is The Heckscher-Ohlin (Factor Proportions) Model, chapter 5 from the book Policy and Theory of International Trade (index.html) (v. 1.0).

Chapter 8 The Instruments of Trade Policy

Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND BUSINESS

Econ 355: International Economics. Econ 355: International Economics. Econ 355: International Economics

not to be republished NCERT Chapter 2 Consumer Behaviour 2.1 THE CONSUMER S BUDGET

ECO 445/545: International Trade. Jack Rossbach Spring 2016

INTERNATIONAL TRADE: THEORY AND POLICY

Gains from Trade. Rahul Giri

14.54 International Trade Lecture 20: Trade Policy (I)

ECONOMICS. Time Allowed: 3 hours Maximum Marks: 100

PubPol 201. Module 3: International Trade Policy. Class 2 Outline. Class 2 Outline. Class 2. The Gains and Losses from Trade

PAPER NO.1 : MICROECONOMICS ANALYSIS MODULE NO.6 : INDIFFERENCE CURVES

International Economics. 3 Comparative Advantage and the Gains from Trade

The one-minute trade policy theorist. (most of what you need to know)

Topic 4: Analysis of Equilibrium.

Consumption, Saving, and Investment. Chapter 4. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education Canada

Ecn Intermediate Microeconomic Theory University of California - Davis November 13, 2008 Professor John Parman. Midterm 2

CHAPTER 3 National Income: Where It Comes From and Where It Goes

Midsummer Examinations 2013

Chapter 7. Costs. An economist is a person who, when invited to give a talk at a banquet, tells the audience there s no such thing as a free lunch.

First Welfare Theorem in Production Economies

We will make several assumptions about these preferences:

Transcription:

PubPol/Econ 541 The Standard Model Elaboration of diagrams in Krugman, Obstfeld & Melitz textbook by Alan V. Deardorff University of Michigan 2016

Trump on Tariffs From interview with WSJ Oct 23: WSJ: A lot of people say that tariffs are really the biggest threat to the economy long term. Mr. Trump: We don t have any tariffs. Mr. Trump: It s so much nonsense, OK. This is your story. We don t even have tariffs. I m using tariffs to negotiate. I mean, other than some tariffs on steel which is actually small, what do we have? I didn t put them on the USMCA. We have a trade deal. I didn t put them on in South Korea. We have a trade deal. That was the worst deal. That was a deal made by Hillary Clinton. It was a horrible deal. We made it into a sound deal. But I didn t put tariffs. Where do we have tariffs? We don t have tariffs anywhere. I read that today: We re worried about the tariffs. You know what happens? A business that s doing badly always likes to blame Trump and the tariffs because it s a good excuse for some incompetent guy that s making $25 million a year. Econ 340, Deardorff, Lecture 12: Trade Balance 2

Trump on Tariffs From WSJ follow-up Oct 24: Tariffs imposed on imports this year: Solar cells and panels: $7 billion imports Washing machines: $2 billion imports Steel: $29 billion imports Aluminum: $19 billion imports Chinese-made goods: $250 billion imports Industrial materials Components Consumer goods Econ 340, Deardorff, Lecture 12: Trade Balance 3

Trump on US-Canada Trade Balance Told by Canada's Justin Trudeau that Canada has a trade deficit with the US, Trump says "I said, 'Wrong, Justin, you do.' I didn t even know. I had no idea." In fact, by US data, the US has a surplus with Canada in goods and services, but a deficit if you count only goods. 2017, $billions: Goods: 17.5 Goods and services: +2.8 As economists explain, there is no reason why countries trade should balance, especially bilaterally, under either measure. Lecture 1: Overview 4

Quote from Trump: Lecture 1: Overview 5

Is he right about almost all countries? US Census reports goods trade balances of US with 234 countries for 2017. US has Surpluses with 130 Deficits with 104 But with our top-10 trading partners (ranked by exports plus imports) we have a surplus with only one: U.K. Of our top 50 partners, we have surpluses with only 36% Lecture 1: Overview 6

Outline Relative supply and demand International equilibrium Effects of growth Effects of trade barriers 7

The Standard Model* Assumes Two goods, cloth C and food F Outputs: Q F, Q C Prices: P F, P C Takes as given Production possibilities Represented by Production Possibility Frontier (PPF) Preferences for consumption Represented by community indifference curves Assumed to be homothetic (see below) *Name given to this model by Krugman and Obstfeld (1991) and subsequent editions. 8

The Standard Model Also assumes (as before) Homogeneous products Perfect competition No distortions (externalities, etc.) Zero costs of trade (transport, etc.) except when we add tariffs 9

The model Includes as special cases The Ricardian model (but linear PPF) Heckscher-Ohlin Model Specific factors model 10

Production Possibilities Q F Curvature Ricardian Model: Not curved Heckscher-Ohlin Model: due to industries different factor intensities Specific Factors Model: due to diminishing returns to nonspecific factor Q C 11

Prices Q F Price lines = iso-value lines: V = P C Q C +P F Q F or Q F = V/P F (P C /P F )Q C P C /P F V 1 V 2 V 3 Q C 12

Equilibrium Production Q F Tangency implies maximum value Supplies depend on price ratio: S C = S C (P C /P F ) S F = S F (P C /P F ) S F 0 P C 0 /P F 0 S C 0 Q C 13

Equilibrium Production Q F Thus Relative Supply, RS = S C /S F, also depends on price ratio, RP = P C /P F : S F 0 RS = RS(RP) RP 0 S C 0 Q C S F /S C =1/RS 14

How Supplies Depend on Prices Q F ΔRP = Δ(P C /P F ) > 0 RP 0 RP 1 => ΔS C > 0 ΔS F < 0 ΔRS > 0 S F 0 S F 1 S C 0 S C 1 Q C ΔRP = Δ(P C /P F ) > 0 15

Relative Supply RP = P C /P F It follows that RS(RP) is upward sloping RS RP 1 RP 0 RS 0 RS 1 RS= S C /S F 16

Preferences Q F Represented by a family of indifference curves for the whole country: Community indifference curves Q C 17

Preferences Q F If we knew the budget line, then we would use it to find demand, from Tangency between budget line and an indifference curve That s the most preferred bundle of the two goods that consumers can afford. Q C 18

Equilibrium Demand Q F D F 0 S F 0 D 0 S 0 Given prices, income is the value of production. So the budget line is the price line tangent to the PPF. And demand is given by its tangency with an indifference curve. D C 0 S C 0 Q C 19

Trade Q F For arbitrary prices, demand will not equal supply D F 0 S F 0 M F 0 D 0 S 0 X C 0 Trade Triangle Their difference will be trade: Exports: S C D C =X C Imports: D C 0 S C 0 Q C D F S F =M F 20

Relative Demand Q F D F 0 D 0 We will use this first, however, to find Relative Demand: RD = D C /D F S F 0 S 0 D C 0 S C 0 RP 0 Q C D F /D C =1/RD 21

How Demands Depend on Prices Q F RP 1 D 1 RP 0 D D 0 0 F D C 0 RP 0 Q C ΔRP = Δ(P C /P F ) > 0 =>? With no assumption on preferences (indifference curves) we can say little about how prices affect demand (Recall income and substitution effects ) 22

Homothetic Preferences Q F Q C We assume: each indifference curve is a radial expansion or contraction of all others Thus: Ratio of demands depends only on ratio of prices Change in income (with prices fixed) does not change relative demand RD = D C /D F 23

How Demands Depend on Prices Q F D 1 F RP 1 D 1 RP 0 D D 0 0 F D 1 D 0 C C RP 0 Q C With homotheticity: ΔRP = Δ(P C /P F ) > 0 => ΔD F > 0 ΔRD < 0 But we still don t know ΔD C >,=,< 0 That s why we now work with relative supply and demand. 24

Relative Demand RP = P C /P F RP 1 It follows that RD(RP) is downward sloping (Drawn as a straight line, but it could curve, and in either direction.) RP 0 RD RD 1 RD 0 RD= D C /D F 25

Autarky Equilibrium RP = P C /P F RS Combine RS and RD RP aut RD RQ aut RQ= Q C /Q F 26

World Relative Supply & Demand For international equilibrium, we need world relative supply and demand (of 2 countries) These cannot be gotten by just adding up those for the individual countries Instead, they are weighted averages of the separate countries Q C W = Q C + Q C * Q F W = Q F + Q F * => RQ W = = Q F Q F + Q F * Q C + Q C * Q F + Q F * Q Q C F * + Q + Q * F F Q F Q C * Q F * RQ W = β QF RQ + (1 β QF )RQ* where Q F β QF = QF + Q F * 27

Thus: World Relative Supply & RS W = β SF RS + (1 β SF )RS* where β SF = S F S F + S F * Demand RD W = β DF RD + (1 β DF )RD* where D β DF = F DF + D F * 28

World Relative Supply RP = P C /P F RS* World relative supply is RS W a weighted average; RS W RS thus lies between the domestic and foreign relative supplies β SF (Strictly speaking, these should not be parallel) RQ= Q C /Q F The larger is the home share of supply, β SF = S F S F + S F * the closer this will be to RS 29

World Relative Demand RP = P C /P F Because of homotheticity, RD is the same in both countries. RD W =RD=RD* So world relative demand is the same as well. RQ= Q C /Q F

International Market Equilibrium RP = P C /P F RS* Int l market equilibrium is RS W the relative price that RS equates world relative supply to world relative demand. RP 0 RQ 0 RD W RQ= Q C /Q F As drawn, the home country is assumed to be the larger relative supplier of good C, so home exports C. 31

International Market Equilibrium RP = P C /P F RP 0 RS* RS W RS The next slide shows production, consumption, and trade in this equilibrium RD W RQ 0 RQ= Q C /Q F 32

International Market Equilibrium Q F Q F * S F * D F D F * S F D C S C S C * D C * Q C Q C * 33

International Trade Q F Trade Triangles (Identical) Q F * S F * X F * D F D F * M F S F X C M C * D C S C S C * D C * Q C Q C * 34

Effects of Growth: Small Country Q F D 1 If prices are given from world market and do not change, then growth of PPF benefits the country. D 0 S 0 S 1 This is true whether the growth is Neutral Biased toward export (cloth) Q C Biased toward import (food) 35

Effects of Growth: Small Country Q F D 0 D 1 S 0 S 1 Q C If prices are given from world market and do not change, then growth of PPF benefits the country. This is true whether the growth is Neutral Biased toward export (cloth) Biased toward import (food) 36

Effects of Growth: Small Country Q F D 1 D 0 S 1 S 0 Q C If prices are given from world market and do not change, then growth of PPF benefits the country. This is true whether the growth is Neutral Biased toward export (cloth) Biased toward import (food) 37

Effects of Growth: Large Country Growth of a large country will usually change world prices So the previous 3 slides no longer show the final effects of growth They do, however, show what happens for given prices, and thus tell us how world relative supply may shift (world relative demand will not shift, if the countries have the same homothetic preferences) 38

Effects of Growth: Large Country Recall that RS W = β SF RS + (1 β SF )RS* where S F β SF = SF + S F * This will increase if either RS or β SF goes up (since we ve assumed RS > RS*) From the slides for neutral, export-biased, and import-biased growth, one or both of these must happen unless growth is strongly biased toward the import (food) 39

Effects of Neutral Growth on World RP = P C /P F RP 0 RP 1 Price: Large Country RS* RS W0 RS 0 =RS 1 RD W RS W1 Large country growth, if neutral RS does not change β SF rises since S F rises RS W shifts right World relative price of cloth goes down. RQ 0 RQ= Q C /Q F Neutral Growth of Large Home Country 40

Effects of Export-Biased Growth on RP = P C /P F RP 0 RP 1 World Price: Large Country RS* RS W0 RD W RS W1 RS 0 RS 1 RQ= Q C /Q F Export-biased Growth of Large Home Country Large country growth, if export-biased Both RS and RS W shift right because RS rises β SF rises World relative price of cloth goes down by more than in the neutral case. 41

Effects of Growth: Large Country Since the country that has grown (Home) was exporting cloth, RP = P C /P F is a worsening of its Terms of Trade The growing country is therefore worse off than if the price had not changed Can it be worse off than if it had not grown? Yes: The Case of Immizerizing Growth 42

Effects of Export-biased Growth and Small Decline of T of T Q F D 1 D 2 Fall in Terms of Trade prevents Home from reaching D 1, but it still benefits from growth by reaching D 2, since that is on a higher indifference curve than D 0. D 0 S 0 S 2 S 1 Q C 1. Export-biased growth at unchanged prices 2. Resulting fall in Terms of Trade 43

Immizerizing Growth Q F D 0 D 1 D 2 Larger fall in Terms of Trade prevents Home from reaching D 0, leaving it on lower indifference curve than if it had not grown at all. S 0 S 2 S 1 Q C 1. Export-biased growth at unchanged prices 2. Resulting fall in Terms of Trade 44

Effects of Import-Biased Growth on RP = P C /P F RP 1? RP 0 RP 1? World Price: Large Country RS* RS W1? RS W0 RD W RS W1? RS RS 1 0 RQ= Q C /Q F Import-biased Growth of Large Home Country Large country growth, if import-biased RS shifts left RS W may shift right or left because RS falls β SF rises World relative price of cloth may rise or fall. 45

Effects of trade barriers A trade barrier might include Import tariff Import quota or other non-tariff barrier Export tax Quantitative export restriction 46

Effects of trade barriers All of these have the effect of raising the domestic relative price of the imported good above the world price In the model here, the home country exports cloth, so a trade barrier causes: P C /P F < P CW /P F W ; i.e., RP < RP W or in a 2-country world: P C /P F < P C */P F * ; i.e., RP < RP* 47

Trade Barriers in a Small Country Q F Home Supply Q F Home Demand (if on same curve) RP W =RP 0 RP W =RP 0 RP 1 RP 1 1/RS 1 1/RS 0 1/RD 0 1/RD 1 Q C Q C 48

Trade Barriers in a Small Country Thus RS shifts left RD shifts right As Home is small, RP W does not change We ll look in an addendum below at what happens inside the small country 49

Trade Barriers in a Large Country Still true that RS shifts left RD shifts right Now, since RS W and RD W are weighted averages that include RS and RD, we must also have RS W shifts left RD W shifts right 50

Trade Barriers in a Large Country RP = P C /P F RP 1 RS W1 RS W0 Trade barrier by home country causes RP to rise The Terms of Trade of Home to improve. RP 0 RD W0 RD W1 RQ= Q C /Q F 51

Addendum on Tariff in General Equilibrium Slides above, for small country, showed Production (supply) in levels Consumption (demand) only as a ratio Reason is that levels of consumption depend on income, which includes both Income from production Revenue from tariffs and/or rents from NTBs Assume now that tariff revenue is redistributed to consumers to be spent like any other income. The following (not included in Krugman-Obstfeld) shows determination of production and consumption 52

Effects of Tariff in Small Country Q F 1/RD 1 D 0 D 1 S 1 RP W1 =RP W0 RP 1 RP 0 =RP W0 S 0 Q C Tariff on F raises price of F above world and thus lowers the relative price of C in the country. This appears as one of the parallel flatter lines RP 1. One determines supply, at S 1. Another determines relative demand, RD 1. D 1 then has ratio RD 1 but same value at world price RP W0 as S 1 (thus balanced trade). 53

Effects of Tariff in Large Country Q F D 0 D 1 S 1 RP W1 >RP W0 RP 0 =RP W0 S 0 Now the reduced trade that the tariff would have caused if prices did not change causes the world price of cloth to rise. This makes it possible (but not certain) that the country will move to a higher indifference curve, as shown. Q C 54