Routes to Market: Smart Motorways Alliance Commercial Model Summary

Similar documents
Commercial (QS) Core Competencies (Feb 17)

ScotWind leasing - new offshore wind leasing for Scotland

Standard forms of partnering contracts The ultimate contractual commitment? Part 4

Finance Committee. Inquiry into methods of funding capital investment projects. Submission from PPP Forum

HVDC Inter-Island Link Upgrade Project. Investment Proposal. Part V Project Costs

Cambourne to Cambridge Better Bus Journeys Scheme: Strategic Outline Business Case Commercial Case City Deal Partners.

Appendix:6.2 MEETING: Paul Sinden Director of Commissioning CONTACT AUTHOR: DETAILS: SUMMARY:

Contract Management in Offshore & Marine, EPCIC and Shipyard

Health Purchasing Victoria Benefits Management Framework 2018

The 10-Day Oil and Gas Contracts Training

ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT

Greater Bristol Bus Network Major Scheme Business Case. Chapter 1. Developing the Full Approval Major Scheme Business Case

Outcomes Based Commissioning in Oxfordshire

NORTHAMPTONSHIRE POLICE AND CRIME COMMISSION RESERVES STRATEGY

OFFICIAL. Date and Time 15 th May 2018 SPA Boardroom, Pacific Quay Forensic Services Budget Management and Month End Guidelines Item Number 10.

P I L L A R I I I D I S C L O S U R E S

Weston Package Phase 1 Major Scheme Business Case. The Financial Case. Scheme cost, financial risk and funding sources

The Board is asked to note progress against the current key challenges in relation to the financial performance:

Consideration of Going concern Status 2014/15 Accounts

2018/19 Technical Guidance Annex D NHS England Guidance for Finance Business Rules

Solvency II Detailed guidance notes for dry run process. March 2010

Draft Programming Document th meeting of the Management Board December 2016

NEC4 ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT

NEC3 ECC target contract option principles and innovative applications

Infrastructure ESG policy guidelines

1 July Guideline for Municipal Competency Levels: Chief Financial Officers

Section 1 OVERVIEW OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

REPORT BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL HC 996 SESSION FEBRUARY Cabinet Office. Improving government procurement

Financial sustainability of schools

RESERVE BANK OF MALAWI

National Disability Insurance Scheme Rules for the Scheme Actuary 2013

Unpacking framework agreements for the delivery and maintenance of infrastructure

Designation and situations requiring de-designation of items within the asset profile; and

PURPOSE OF REPORT: The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of the Trust s SLR performance for Month 10 of 2011/12.

Capital Requirements Directive Pillar 3 Disclosure

FY APPENDIX #1 - BUDGET IMPROVEMENT TARGET MEASUREMENT

Introduction to the CFD. James Rushton Head of Commercial LCCC 1 December 2016

MODULE 5 PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT, PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTS

REPORT 2015/094 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

SCHEDULE 5.1 MILESTONE PAYMENTS AND CLAIMS PROCEDURE

Understanding Energy Contracts

Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. AIDS HELPLINE: Prevention is the cure

IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Towards a DEA Appendix II

Microfinance Institutions Ratings

MILA SULLIVAN PROCUREMENT CONSULTANT

Definitions. Terms of Reference

SPAIN Zaragoza Tramway SUMMARY OVERVIEW ZARAGOZA TRAMWAY. Location Zaragoza, Aragón, Spain

PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES MERCER UK AUGUST 2016

This project receives funding from the European Union s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.

Draft price control determination notice: company-specific appendix South West Water

Manchester Health and Care Commissioning. Finance Committee. Terms of Reference

London fit-out spring 2017 survey

Input methodologies review related party transactions

Financial statements. Group financial statements. Company financial statements. 68 Independent auditor s report 74 Consolidated income statement

HM Treasury consultation on legislation in draft: Corporation tax relief for expenditure on grassroots sports

POLICE SCOTLAND S BUDGET PLANNING FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR

HUB PROGRAMME DELIVERY OFFICE GUIDANCE NOTE. Revisions to Payment Provisions for Consultants

Harbour Asset Management New Zealand Equity Advanced Beta Fund FAQ S

EQUITY PARTNERSHIP TRUST

This part of the document details the budgeted costs for 2018/19 in support of our strategy, as laid out in Part One of this Business Plan.

UNIT 11: STANDARD COSTING

Strategic Transport Forum 15 th September Agenda Item 4: National Investment Programmes - Roads

ERM and ORSA Assuring a Necessary Level of Risk Control

UBS Limited. Pillar 3 Disclosures. June UBS Limited 1 Finsbury Avenue London, EC2M 2PP.

Challenges in Cost Certainty for Public Infrastructure Procurement

2. The BCPP collaboration encompasses 13 Funds with combined assets of 36bn (fund valuations at 31 March 2015).

NHS financial sustainability

The tasks of the Managing Authority under IPARD II. Multi-country workshop, 13 November 2015 Tirana

Revenue Monitoring Report as at 14 September 2013, Period 6

Decision on Electricity Network Connection Policy

INSTITUTE AND FACULTY OF ACTUARIES. Curriculum 2019 SPECIMEN SOLUTIONS

Assurance Approach Delivery assurance activities for Retail Market Release April 2019

SCOTTISH FUNDING COUNCIL CAPITAL PROJECTS DECISION POINT PROCESS

New on the Horizon: Accounting for dynamic risk management activities

IAIS: Enterprise Risk Management for Capital Adequacy & Solvency Purposes. George Brady. IAIS Deputy Secretary General

UNITED UTILITIES PR19 BUSINESS PLAN SUBMISSION

INSURANCE CORE PRINCIPLES, STANDARDS, GUIDANCE AND ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

Discussion Paper - Accounting for Dynamic Risk Management: a Portfolio Revaluation Approach to Macro Hedging

NEC4: Evolution not Revolution. Delivering distinctive, high quality projects across the construction and property industry

HSBC Holdings plc. Directors Remuneration Policy Supplement 2017

OFFICIAL. Date 14 March 2019 COSLA Conference Centre, Edinburgh

Building & Construction Law all notes

NOTE ON THE COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT

Impact of changes to the Paper P3, Business Analysis and Paper P5, Advanced Performance Management syllabuses from June 2011

Report. Chris Ford Joint Chief Finance Officer

The IASB s technical agenda

Apollo Management International LLP Pillar 3 Disclosures

PIMCO Europe Ltd Pillar 3 Disclosure. As at 31 December 2015

Financial Allocations 2016/ /21

Standard User Funding Agreement (SUFA) Regulatory Notes (Volume 3)

2014 Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Feedback Pilot Project Observations of the Group Solvency Issues (E) Working Group

RESERVES STRATEGY 2018/19

Report of Housing and Environment Lead Commissioner

Risk Approach to Prioritising Maintenance Risk Factors for Value Management

The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust

Accounting proposals for insurance contracts

Cambourne to Cambridge Better Bus Journeys Scheme: Strategic Outline Business Case Financial Case City Deal Partnership.

Do we believe SMAs help boost after-tax returns?

A FUNDER S PERSPECTIVE CIVIL EX - DUBLIN. Obey Mhondera - Project Manager. National Roads Authority. Mark Wearen - Associate. Bruce Shaw Partnership

Pillar 3 Regulatory Disclosure (UK)

Transcription:

Routes to Market: Smart Motorways Alliance Commercial Model Summary August 2018 Overview: The proposals outlined within are draft proposals and subject to sign-off from our governance process. Non-participation in the market engagement exercise will not prevent participation in the procurement process. Participation in the market engagement exercise, and any information provided, will not be used for evaluation purposes in any future procurement processes. The same information will be accessible to all interested parties throughout the market engagement exercise. Any information/feedback provided by the market may be used by Highways England in undertaking analysis necessary for the finalisation of the delivery model. No information provided by Highways England within should be relied upon as a representation or commitment by Highways England for how the final Alliance model will work. The information provided by Highways England in this document has been prepared in good faith and does not purport to be comprehensive nor independently verified. Highways England does not accept any liability or responsibility for its accuracy, adequacy or completeness, nor do they hold any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to any information provided during the market engagement exercise. 1

1 Document Purpose This document describes the updated approach to Budget Setting and Incentivisation previously presented at the Supplier Engagement session in July 2018. The information contained within this document has considered feedback from previous market engagement to improve the model and aims to provide further detail regarding these two elements of the Smart Motorways Alliance commercial model. This document reflects most recent developments within the Smart Motorways Alliance (SMA) and Routes to Market procurement solution. Further information will be available during the official procurement stages. HE are seeking feedback from participants on the updated commercial arrangements for the Smart Motorways Alliance outlined in this document, specifically any key matters that would influence the participants appetite to tender or impact the structure of their future tender submission. Please send feedback by Wednesday 5 September to the following email address: RTMYourQuestions@highwaysengland.co.uk 2 Commercial Model Overview 2.1.1 Commercial Drivers & Objectives The primary objective of the commercial model for the SMA contract is to create a delivery environment with shared ownership of the programme budget and a risk profile which links the Alliance Partner fee recovery (overhead and profit) to collective delivery performance. It is anticipated that a programmatic approach will encourage standardisation of the smart motorway product and delivery solutions and hence improve the economy and efficiency with which individual schemes and consequently each Roads Investment Strategy (RIS) period are delivered. Additionally, providing suppliers more visibility of the future work bank will increase their ability to invest in innovative production techniques and building their capability on a sustainable basis. The key objectives of the commercial model are to: Drive collaboration through shared objectives and key performance indicators that aggregate performance and reward individual partners at Alliance collective level. Provide for partner returns to be improved by delivering solutions that drive down cost below the programme budget. Incentivise suppliers to collaborate effectively with Highways England and each other to mitigate underperformance by sharing knowledge and resources in an open-book environment. Provide an incentive model which provides confidence in the contractual programme budget, and provides additional opportunity for reward. A sustainable risk profile for the Alliance partners. 2

3 Alliance Budget Setting The SMA will be contracted to deliver the entire Smart Motorway Programme (SMP) for the balance of RIS 1, RIS 2 and RIS 3, using a single multi-party Alliance contract entered into by Highways England and all Alliance Partners. The Alliance Partners will be incentivised against the Alliance budget to deliver the key outcomes of the programme. The Alliance budget will be established from the funding settlement agreed with Department for Transport (DfT) through the following steps: 1. The Alliance scope of works will be costed utilising historic cost data with supporting quantities for those schemes with a preliminary design. Works which do not have a preliminary design developed will utilise historical costs for a typical scheme adjusted through a quantitative risk assessment for elements which are seen as abnormal. 2. An assumption of future work expected to be delivered within RIS 3 will be included in the Alliance budget with provision for efficiency that will be required to secure funding settlement from DfT. Should the forecast scope change for RIS 3 then an adjustment via change control will be applied to the Alliance budget when the settlement is reached. 3. The SMP budget will be subject to efficient commitments which will be embedded within the funding baseline (post efficient) and carried forward into the Alliance budget. 4. The budget will include all Alliance costs, partners, supply chain and Highways England (including Highways England Alliance resources) including Alliance Partner fees. 5. Inflation will be allowed for within the budget, aligned to RIS 2 settlement agreed with DfT, and a defined inflation index for RIS 3. The RIS 3 inflation allowance can be adjusted via change control when the settlement is reached. 6. All foreseeable delivery risks will be included within the budget. Adjustment to the budget is only envisaged with changes to high level client requirements. Figure 1 Alliance budget components 3

4 Incentive Model The Smart Motorways Alliance commercial and incentive model sets out the way in which the Alliance partners will be rewarded for achieving Highways England required outcomes. The Alliance commercial model is set up to allow Alliance Partners to recover a guaranteed proportion of their fee and attain remaining proportions of fee based upon their ability to perform in accordance to budget and other defined objectives relating to required Highways England outcomes. The Alliance Partners will be required to submit at tender stage a fee percentage based upon their forecast Alliance scope. This will be aggregated for all partners into an Alliance lump sum fee and paid on a regular basis in accordance with the terms of payment for each proportion of the fee and earned value achieved. The Alliance lump sum fee will be apportioned into three individual elements; base fee proportion, Alliance goals fee proportion, and an Alliance budget fee proportion. Figure 2 How fee is recovered Base proportion: This element of the fee will be paid to Alliance partners regardless of performance. It is intended to support a proportion of a partner s corporate overhead contribution requirements, however will be set at a level such that the goals proportion of fee and budget fee will be required in order to achieve satisfactory overhead and profit recovery to their business. Goals proportion: This fee element will link reward to achieving Highways England key programme outcomes. It will be paid to partners on the basis that the Alliance collectively achieves performance targets aligned to the key programme outcomes. In the event that part or all of the goals fee element is not earned in the year due to underperformance against the targets, it will be made available for reinvestment by the Alliance in initiatives to address the areas of underperformance. 4

Budget proportion: In the context of the programmatic approach and certainty relating to the pipeline of work, this fee element will incentivise the Alliance partners to invest in innovation and productivity to ensure delivery against the programme budget. The Alliance will secure payment of this fee proportion in full in the event that programme out-turn is equal to the post efficient Alliance budget. The budget fee element however cannot be earned from any savings achieved due to amounts being forfeited from the goals fee element. All three proportions of the fee will be assessed and payable against earned value on a monthly basis. This will ensure regular payment of overhead contributions to the Alliance Partner s businesses. Alliance Budget surplus/deficit The Alliance Partners are able to earn an additional return through a proportion of gain share against the Alliance budget, over and above the budget share, in circumstances of budget outperformance (underspend). A liability cap to the Alliance Partners for overall budget performance (overspend) will be set at the same level as the budget fee proportion. The share of overspend and underspend against the Alliance budget between the Alliance Partners and Highways England will vary in defined ranges. These ranges and share distribution will be provided during the ITN procurement phase. The figure below shows how elements of the fee are recovered and impacted in different cost outturn scenarios against the Alliance budget: Figure 3 Cost out-turn scenarios 5