SUPERINTENDENT MONITORING REPORT February 15, 2011 Executive Limitations: 3.3 Financial Conditions (Balance Sheet) and Activity (Income Statement)

Similar documents
POLICY TYPE: EXECUTIVE LIMITATIONS POLICY TITLE: GLOBAL EXECUTIVE CONSTRAINT

POLICY TYPE: EXECUTIVE LIMITATIONS POLICY TITLE: GLOBAL EXECUTIVE CONSTRAINT DATE OF ADOPTION:

AURORA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Division of Finance E. First Avenue Suite 106 Aurora, Colorado M E M O R A N D U M

AURORA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Division of Finance E. First Avenue Suite 106 Aurora, Colorado M E M O R A N D U M

CEO MANAGEMENT LIMITATIONS POLICY INTERPRETATIONS

Table of Contents. 3.0 Executive Limitations Policies

Atlanta Public Schools Board of Education Budget Commission. September 20, 2018

Executive Administration. Office of Community Engagement

Budget Development for Budget Forums May 23 and 24, 2011

Mequon-Thiensville School District Releases Administrative Action Plan

AURORA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Division of Finance E. First Avenue, Suite 106 Aurora, Colorado M E M O R A N D U M

The Responsibility of the Board of Education in School District Finances

Millbrae Elementary School District First Interim for Fiscal Year Board of Trustees

Summit Financial Limitation Policy

AR 3600 Auxiliary Organizations

Agenda. Work Session: Budget. Work Session: Community Workforce Agreements

Dollars. sense. 2015/2016 Adopted Budget

Photos by Susie Fitzhugh. Board Budget Work Session October 28, 2015 (Revised)

SCHOOL BUDGETS 101. Mesa County Valley School District 51

Aurora Public Schools Foundation

DENMARK-OLAR SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. TWO BAMBERG COUNTY, S. C. BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION JUNE 30, 2015

School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM

Caledonia-Mumford Budget Development Board of Education Meeting March 13, Central School District

STATE PUBLIC SCHOOL FUND (LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCIES - LEAS)

WEST IRON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT. Financial Report with Supplemental Information Prepared in Accordance with GASB 34.

Preliminary General Fund Budget for Board of Education Presentation Janece L. Maez, Chief Financial Officer June 6, 2013

Fresno USD 3000 BP 3470 Business and Noninstructional Operations

Staff Budget Reduction Recommendation. Board of Education Meeting January 11, 2011

ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT JUNE 30, 2013

CUYAHOGA HEIGHTS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT CUYAHOGA COUNTY REGULAR AUDIT

NASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION

Quarterly, Semi-Annual, and Annual Monitoring Executive Performance CEO s Interpretation and its Justification

Durango School District 9-R Proposed Budget Student Based Allocation Version

DENMARK-OLAR SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. TWO BAMBERG COUNTY, S. C. BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION JUNE 30, 2017

DOLLARS SENSE 2017/2018 ADOPTED BUDGET

Orange Unified School District (C) Copyright March 2018 All Rights Reserved

The Responsibility of the Board of Education in Managing School District Fiscal Fitness New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY

GARDEN CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS. PROPOSED BUDGET Overview and Revenue Projections. February 7, 2012

City of DuPont Financial Policies

Duval County Public Schools

PENCIL FOUNDATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006

South Orange-Maplewood School District. February 27, 2017

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FOR GEORGIA LOCAL UNITS OF ADMINISTRATION. 10/30/91 II Financial Reporting. 1 March 2017 II-7 QBE Program Reporting/Budgeting

Dr. Abrego Superintendent. Director of Finance. DATE: May 2, SUBJECT: 3 rd Quarter Fiscal year All Funds Financial Reports March 31, 2018

Board of Education Budget Adoption June 28, 2016

LCAP / Supplemental and Concentration Regulations

Fiscal Health Risk Analysis Key Fiscal Indicators for K-12 Districts

February 2018 Monthly Financial Report

Also enclosed is a letter to the Board summarizing the results of the audit. Please present this letter to the Board.

West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission

1 MCSD Budget Presentation Meeting

Killingly Public Schools

South Orange-Maplewood School District. February 25, 2013

Oxford Hills Athletic Boosters Association Financial Policy

Budget Draft Dated: 3/1/18 William Hogan, Deputy Superintendent of Business and Finance. Revised

Board Policy No

Maurice Mo Green, Superintendent 712 North Eugene Street, Greensboro, NC

TOTAL PROJECTED INCREASE IN REVENUE $ 1,052,000

LA16-06 STATE OF NEVADA. Performance Audit. Office of the Attorney General. Legislative Auditor Carson City, Nevada

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, OR

West Windsor-Plainsboro Regional School District Financial Literacy

IV. Executive Limitations

Solana Beach School District

Budget General Information (characteristics of district) Supplemental Information for Tables in Summary of Expenditures

EMPACT Northwest Administrative Standard Operating Policy 2015

NOVATO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. March 25, Presented by: Karen Maloney, CFO

FISCAL CONTROLS. Purpose. Policy. Procedure. Date of Approval: August 18, 2013

IMPLEMENTATION QUICK START ACTION PLANNER. UNIFORM GUIDANCE - 2 CFR Parts 200 and 2900 COMPLETION. Policies and Procedures

General Fund Revenue Year End Projection

ATKINSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION PEARSON, GEORGIA

This document is to review and respond to final major budget realignment information for the closeout of the 2018 fiscal year.

SCHOOL DISTRICT FREMONT RE-1

HOLLY DRIVE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY CASHFLOW PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR

EFC HIGHER EDUCATION ACT REAUTHORIZATION POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS

NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING AND AGENDA. February 27, Educational Services Center 395 South Pratt Parkway Longmont, Colorado 80501

Tukwila School District. Tukwila School District Budget Advisory Committee. February 20, 2019

RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2

DOUGLASS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 396

ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT JUNE 30, 2017

South Orange-Maplewood School District. January 30, 2017

BLUEFIELD STATE COLLEGE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2018 AND 2017

CHATHAM MARKETPLACE EXECUTIVE LIMITATIONS POLICIES

Superintendent s Preliminary Budget

ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR FINANCIAL SERVICES

FINANCIAL REPORT (Audited)

Buckeye Local School District Jefferson County, Ohio. Audited Financial Statements

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD JT #1

PENCIL FOUNDATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION JUNE 30, 2008 AND 2007

CENTRAL OKANAGAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS ANNUAL BUDGET PRESENTATION

CORINTHIAN COLLEGES INC

Overview of the Title VI-B LEA Authenticated Application: Maintenance of Effort & Excess Cost. Revised 2/28/2013

MADISON METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT Madison, Wisconsin. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2017

QUESTION/ANSWER SHEET

Name of applicant: / / Surname (family name) Given (first) name Middle name. Citizenship: U.S. permanent resident? Yes No

MADISON DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS MADISON HEIGHTS, MICHIGAN AUDIT REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010

Great Hearts America Texas Financial and Compliance Report

Santa Fe Trail USD 434

Calculation Guide for the Financial Efficiency Star Rating

HOLLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BOARD OF EDUCATION POLICY

Transcription:

SUPERINTENDENT MONITORING REPORT February 15, 2011 Executive Limitations: 3.3 Financial Conditions (Balance Sheet) and Activity (Income Statement) Policy 3.3 Summary The Superintendent shall neither cause nor allow the development of fiscal jeopardy or a material deviation of actual expenditures from Board priorities established in District Goals policies. Interpretation of policy elements 1, 2 and 4. Policy elements 1, 2 and 4 address activities found in the district s income statement. These activities relate to changes in the district s net assets at year end as reflected on the district s balance sheet. Activities that would result in a net deficit position arising within the general fund at year-end, and after netting interfund borrowing and maintenance of required reserves, are prohibited and the Superintendent will not cause or allow the district or any school chartered by the district to: 1. Expend more funds in any fund than have been received in the fiscal year to date unless the debt, reserve and liquidity guidelines identified in policy elements 2, 3, 4 and 11 below are met. 2. Indebt or obligate the district in an amount greater than can be repaid by certain, otherwise unencumbered revenues by the end of the fiscal year. For any fund, have inadequate reserves, use any reserve other than intended, or use any Board-designated reserves. a. For the general fund, allow reserves to be less than 5 percent of its annual revenues. 4. Conduct inter-fund shifting in amounts greater than can be restored to a condition of discrete fund balances by certain, otherwise unencumbered revenues within each fiscal year. Interpretation of policy elements 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11. Policy elements 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 address district assets and liabilities as reflected in its balance sheet and as related to the district s capacity to continue activities as a going concern. Actions that would change the district s position with regard to fixed real assets or other significant assets are prohibited and the Superintendent will not cause or allow the district or any school chartered by the district to: 3. Incur a financially illiquid condition. 5. Receive, acquire, encumber, improve or dispose of real property. Maintenance and replacement of building components are permitted improvements. BOE February 15, 2011, Monitoring Report on Policy 3.3 Page 1

6. Sell any significant portion of the district s assets. 7. Achieve compliance with Policy 3.3 by endangering the district s future capacity to achieve its Goals. 11. Establish and retain less than prudent reserves for contingent obligations. Interpretation of policy elements 8 through 10. Policy elements 8 through 10 address the timely conduct of financial and business transactions that affect the district s cash flows. The Superintendent shall accomplish these transactions so as to: 8. Settle payroll, accounts and debts in a timely manner. 9. Make timely and accurate tax and other government ordered payments. 10. Aggressively pursue receivables after a reasonable grace period. Report of Financial Activities. As of December 31, 2010 the General Fund spending rate was 89.4 percent. The average spending rate over the last 14 reporting periods was 92.2 percent. 96.0% 95.0% 94.0% 93.0% 92.0% 91.0% 90.0% 89.0% 88.0% 87.0% 86.0% Average General Fund Spending Rate General Fund Spending Rate As reflected in the unaudited December 31, 2010, Consolidated Quarterly Financial Report, financial activities were accomplished so as to comply with policy. Looking forward, and taking into account the additional reductions in state equalization funding and $14.6 million of accrued compensation, we anticipate ending FY2010-11 with a General Fund balance of $14.6 million or 5.1 percent of budgeted General Fund revenues. With regard to interfund lending, as of December 31, a balance of $5,414,322 was on loan from the General Fund to the Grants Fund, pending receipt of reimbursements from federal grant sources. A balance of $232,511 was on loan from the General Fund to the Nutrition Services Fund, pending receipt of meal reimbursements from federal grant sources. BOE February 15, 2011, Monitoring Report on Policy 3.3 Page 2

During FY2010-11, revised borrowing requirements are as follows: Fund Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 General 14,252,330 8,356,196 10,369,239 6,358,922 20,133,081 30,268,156 Risk 326,502 487,918 686,282 398,240 617,799 833,878 CPP 414,347 403,489 361,567 312,662 276,236 477,867 Grants (4,535,025) (4,412,998) (4,578,034) (4,249,374) (5,627,648) (6,125,697) Spec Programs 3,950,993 3,443,095 3,019,913 2,604,388 1,918,937 1,627,081 Athletic 255,693 236,361 221,505 203,808 185,821 151,137 Cap Reserve 1,237,559 1,458,222 1,731,074 1,939,792 2,177,424 1,449,300 Nutrition (600,576) (730,494) (628,515) (344,775) 100,536 (438,533) Copier Svs 279,232 291,945 290,095 305,106 299,206 238,298 Print Svs 370,879 349,963 328,481 302,324 286,510 285,828 Total 15,951,934 9,883,696 11,801,608 7,831,092 20,367,902 28,767,315 Amounts in (parentheses) indicate negative cash balances requiring interfund borrowing. On November 16, 2010, the board approved a $25 million borrowing resolution from the state treasurer s interest-free loan program. However, cash flow revisions due to state funding changes in student count indicate that the district will require only the December borrowing from the state treasurer under the interest-free loan program. The district drew down $16,821,059 from the authorized amount on December 16, 2010. The loan is expected to be paid in full during the March/April timeframe. Cash balances will continue to be monitored. The district ended Q2 of FY2010-11 in a liquid and sound financial condition. Moreover, I can report that its financial activities comported with the requirements of Policy 3.3, elements 1, 2 and 4. Barring unforeseen and profoundly adverse macroeconomic or public finance shocks, the district will remain in a sound and liquid financial condition throughout FY2010-11. Evidence of Compliance with Policy 3.3, elements 1, 2 and 4. Detailed evidence of financial activity compliance can be found on pages 11 through 14 of the December 31, 2010, Consolidated Quarterly Financial Report. Statement of Financial Position. As addressed above, the district retained reserves required by Board Policy 3.3 and TABOR. Spending rates as an annualized percentage of appropriated budget exceeded 100 percent for the following funds or charter schools: Lotus School for Excellence 102.3 % Global Village Academy 113.9 % Risk Related Activity Fund 115.5 % Funds will be monitored to ensure that appropriated budgets are not exceeded at year end. Evidence of Compliance with Policy 3.3, elements 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11. Detailed evidence of the district s financial position with regard to assets, liabilities and BOE February 15, 2011, Monitoring Report on Policy 3.3 Page 3

capacity to continue operations as a going concern is presented on pages 7 though 9 of the Consolidated Quarterly Financial Report. With regard to liquidity, as illustrated on page 6, Cash Flow Analysis, of the Consolidated Financial Report, district cash on hand, including the cash flow loan from the state treasurer s office was sufficient to serve the needs of the district throughout the quarter ending December 31, 2010. Statement of Compliance with Policy 3.3, elements 8 through 10. During this monitoring period, the district made tax withholding, retirement account, medical insurance and other payments in a timely manner. It also completed payroll and debt service payments in a timely manner. With regard to receivables, the district promptly sought reimbursement for Medicare, transportation, food service and federal grants, thereby minimizing the need for interfund borrowing. Evidence of timely accomplishment of financial and business transactions. As of January 31, 2011, invoice aging reflected an outstanding payable balance of $358,214. Of this amount, 88 percent was for invoices received in the past 30 days and 12 percent was on invoices with an age of 30 days or longer. The district makes payment on invoices in accordance with invoice payment terms and following receipt of invoiced goods and services. Where goods are purchased on a purchase order, payment is made following a match between the purchase order, receipt of an invoice and receipt of goods. Payments made with P-cards are generally negotiated with the merchant within 1-3 working days; the district reconciles merchant payments on a monthly basis and pays the balance due on the fifth day of each month. BOE February 15, 2011, Monitoring Report on Policy 3.3 Page 4

SUPERINTENDENT MONITORING REPORT March 1, 2011 Executive Limitations 3.2: Treatment of Staff The Superintendent shall neither cause nor allow District circumstances for staff (including employees, independent contractors and volunteers) that are unfair, undignified, disrespectful, disorganized or unclear. The Superintendent shall not cause or allow the District to 1. Operate without sufficient, written rules, expectations and processes or those, whether written or not, that: subject staff to rules or expectations that are unavailable or confusing; The 2011 staff climate survey provides data on staff perceptions related to this policy requirement. o Classified staff 90 percent report understanding their roles and responsibilities as an employee of APS; 72 percent report that clear goals and objectives have been defined for their job. o Licensed staff 66 percent report knowing how their work relates to APS goals and priorities as stated in the VISTA 2015 plan; 64 percent report that performance evaluations are fair at their school (another 22 percent answered neutral). o Administrative/Professional Technical staff 87 percent report knowing how their work relates to the district s goals and priorities as stated in the VISTA 2015 plan; 83 percent report that their performance evaluations are fair. leave staff an ineffective or biased method of resolving grievances; or Article 43 of the Negotiated Agreement provides a proven and unbiased method of resolving grievances for certificated staff. Policy GBK and accompanying regulation and exhibits is the grievance procedure for classified staff. Policy GCQF addresses the grievance procedure for administrative and professional/technical staff.

subject staff to wrongful conditions, nepotism, or preferential treatment based on personal or unprofessional reasons. Policy GBA Hiring / Equal Employment Opportunity Policy GBAA Nondiscrimination / Non-harassment of Employees Policy GBEA Staff Ethics / Conflict of Interest Policy GBEBC Gifts to and Solicitation by Staff Policy GBI Staff Participation in Political Activities 2. Act contrary to law by discriminating or retaliating against any staff member for nondisruptive expression of dissent. Because of the VISTA 2015 commitment to transparency and two-way, communication, the District has created opportunities for staff to provide feedback, including dissenting views. Below are examples of this work. o APS High School Schedule In fall 2010, staff created several opportunities for feedback on the arbitrator s nonbinding decision at board meetings. This included relocating a meeting to a larger venue, and organizing the agenda so there was ample opportunity for audience comments. Based on feedback and dissenting views, the District asked high school staff to work together to consider whether APS should continue with the best-practice model of an eight-period, alternating block schedule, or if the District should adopt a revised bell schedule. After two months of discussion and feedback in winter 2011, the high school schedule for 2011-12 has been adjusted to a seven-period traditional model with teachers offering five periods of instruction each day. o Graduation requirements In alignment with the APS vision to graduate every student with the choice to attend college without remediation, the District proposed a change in graduation requirements, which would align them with the Colorado Commission on Higher Education. Before introducing a proposal for change, the Division of Instruction conducted numerous meetings and discussions with high school principals, high school teachers and building accountability committees. The work was coordinated by a committee comprised of high school principals, high school counselors and representatives from the Division of Instruction. When the proposal was presented to the Board of Education, staff created opportunities for feedback and organized the board agenda to provide ample opportunity for audience comments. Now that the Board has approved the change in requirements, the Division of Instruction will actively create opportunities to engage physical education teachers in the development of academic and career pathway elements that promote health and wellness. o APS budget reduction process Because APS predicted a $25 million gap between revenues and expenditures, the District continued its practice of providing a proactive, transparent budget reduction process that includes the opportunity for staff and parents to present their views on cost reductions and revenue increase ideas.

Prior to creating the list of more than $40 million possible cuts, the District consulted with representatives from employee groups. The Superintendent has provided staff regular budget updates. The District created a 2011-12 budget website that provides staff information about the budget reduction process. In Feb. 2011, the District encouraged staff to complete a budget survey On Feb. 28, staff, parents and community members will have the opportunity to share additional views on the budget reduction process Staff will create opportunities for feedback at Board meeting by organizing the board agenda to provide ample opportunity for audience comments. 3. Permit staff to be unprepared to deal with emergency situations. District and site administrators make sure staff members are prepared and aware of emergency situations in the district and throughout the community. Drills are practice routinely at school and district sites including: Incident Response Team Drills Tabletop Exercises Level Lockdown Drills Tornado Drills Emergency Handbook Connect-ED messages to inform of inclement weather, delays, cancelations Communication Updates via e-mail Communication support when incidents/emergencies do occur, including strategy, message development and media response 4. Ineffectively or untimely (a) resolve concerns and complaints or (b) respond to inquiries. In a timely and effective manner, respond to statements of concern or requests for explanations that have been submitted by parents or citizens to the BOE during Board meetings. Request additional information as needed from the appropriate department to address concerns or complaints. Provide the information or answer to the parent or citizen. Examples of this: questions regarding standard-based grading (Division of instruction) and attendance issues (Division of Equity and Engagement) 5. Ignore staff opinion about pending decisions or actions from those likely to be affected. Numerous subjects have been presented to staff for input including: VISTA 2015 District Calendars Climate Surveys Pacing Guides Response to Intervention

Equity Training School Based Health Centers Graduation Requirements Interim Assessments Standards Based Grading & Gradebook Professional Learning Fifth Block 6. Permit staff (a) to be uninformed of this policy or (b) without a process to be heard for persons who believe they have not been accorded a reasonable interpretation of their protections under this policy. Staff will be presented with information in regard to governance policy 3.2, treatment of staff, via the following communications: Superintendent Bulletin Briefings with AEA, CEC and SEA Meetings with Principals District Web site Board agenda/minutes