2

Similar documents
VILLAGE OF PELLSTON, MICHIGAN EMMET COUNTY. State of Michigan Economic Vitality Incentive Program Employee Compensation Plan

Other Post Employment Benefits

ENROLLED SENATE BILL No. 686

Pension Funding & Plan Design

MERS Retiree Health Funding Vehicle Uniform Resolution

Managing Pension & OPEB Obligations. CARFAC Presentation to the Board of Commissioners December 10, 2012

October 22, Section I - Required Communications with Those Charged with Governance

Jim SChutz,~~ Assistant City Manager

CITY OF CHICAGO. Retiree Health Plan Review Preliminary Projections

RESOLUTION ADOPTING A CITY COUNCIL POLICY FOR FUNDING OTHER POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) RELATED TO RETIREE HEALTHCARE

November 8, Section III contains updated legislative and informational items that we believe will be of interest to you.

Protecting Local Government Retirement and Benefits Act Corrective Action Plan: Retirement Health Benefit Systems

Respectfully submitted,

WHEREAS, the City of Atlanta ("City") offers insurance benefits to its active and retired employees and their families; and

City of Sylvan Lake Municipal Employees Retirement System of Michigan (MERS) CBIZ Retirement Plan Services (Pension actuary)

December Mr. Randall Blum Finance Director City of Eastpointe Eastpointe, Michigan Dear Mr. Blum:

March 25, Mr. Randall Blum Finance Director City of Eastpointe Eastpointe, Michigan Dear Mr. Blum:

September 15, Mr. Randall Blum Deputy Finance Director City of Eastpointe Eastpointe, Michigan Dear Mr. Blum:

Understanding Your Healthcare Options in Retirement. Presented by: Tara Tyler

Recent Significant GASB Pronouncements. William Feng, Chief Accountant October 2018

Police Pension Fund Funding Policy January 22, 2018

MUNICIPAL PENSION PLANS. September 21, 2011 House Finance Committee Senate Finance Committee

CITY OF YPSILANTI ACCOUNTING FOR POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PLANS UNDER GASB #45 AS OF JUNE 30, 2017 FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2017

City of Fraser Retiree Health Care Plan Actuarial Valuation Report As of June 30, 2017

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2016 SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF (1303)

An Overview of the New GASB Pension Accounting and Reporting Standards. Presented By: Joel Knopp, CPA

The Housing Authority of the City of Pharr Texas Texas County & District Retirement System GASB 75 Report

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY

RE: Actuarial Valuation of Other Post-Employment Benefits under GASB Statements No. 74 and 75 as of June 30, 2017

Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund

Healthcare Analytics Consulting. Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits as of Fiscal Year End June 30, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.

March 18, Teachers Retirement Board California State Teachers Retirement System

RESOLUTION ELECTING TO ESTABLISH A HEALTH BENEFIT VESTING REQUIREMENT FOR FUTURE RETIREES UNDER THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT

The OPEB Journey: One Municipality s Success Story

City of Dearborn Retiree Health Care Plan

City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Charter Township of Independence. Other Post Employment Benefits

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2014 MANISTEE CRC (5103)

Staff Report. Elia Bamberger, Director of Human Resources

Other Postemployment Benefits OPEB

State Retirement and Pension System of Maryland Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2004

City of Grand Blanc County of Genesee State of Michigan

Public sector employers already face growing financial. How Public Sector Employers Can Manage Retiree Health Liabilities. Retirement Strategies

June 18, 2018 REGULAR MONTHLY BOARD MEETING Chair Chris Holman

June 19, Compute the City s recommended contribution rate for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2015.

OPEB Reporting Overview: Implications of the Choice to Fund or Not Fund

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2014 OTSEGO CRC (6901)

Discussion of Valuation Results

MOBILE, ALABAMA, that the FY budgets for the General Fund, Capital Improvement, and Convention Center are hereby adopted.

Subject: Actuarial Valuation Report for the Year Ending December 31, 2016

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA 90755

Retiree Pensions and Health Benefits: State and Local Governments Face New Budget Challenges

Defined Benefit Plan Adoption Agreement

Local Governments in Michigan: A Few Updates and Treasury s new Approach

MASSACHUSETTS OPEB COMMISSION. Discussion Worcester Regional Research Bureau November 6, 2013 Henry Dormitzer

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON, CALIFORNIA, REAFFIRMING RESOLUTION

March 26, The purpose of the valuation of the City of Eastpointe Employees Death Benefit Plan as of November 1, 2012 is to:

VILLAGE OF CARPENTERSVILLE CARPENTERSVILLE POLICE PENSION FUND. Actuarial Valuation Report. For the Year. Beginning January 1, 2016

February 23, 2016 Agenda Item XI.1: Page 1

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2015 FRASER, CITY OF (5003)

October 13, 2016 Actuarial Valuation Report: The City of Newport, Rhode Island Post-Retirement Benefits Plan as of July 1, 2016

Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pension Actuarial Valuation July 1, September 2008

TOWN OF TISBURY OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM

P O L I C E M E N S A N N U I T Y A N D B E N E F I T F U N D O F C H I C A G O A C T U A R I A L V A L U A T I O N R E P O R T F O R T H E Y E A R E

Impacts of GASB 74/75 on CalSTRS and Employers. Presented on July 13, 2017

Accounting for the OPEB Obligation

TOWN OF COHASSET, MASSACHUSETTS OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM

Central Marin Police Authority

1.02 TRINITY COUNTY. County Contract No. Board Item Request Form Department Personnel. Contact Carol Martin

To Bond or Not to Bond: Is That Your Question? Moderator: Leon Hank, MERS Chief Financial Officer

RESOLUTION No

August 28, Dear Mr. Bean:

POLICEMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO (A Component Unit of the City of Chicago)

Actuarial Basics. Presented by Mike Overley, Regional Manager Tony Radjenovich, Regional Manager

Kerrie Vanden Bosch, Executive Director

July 30, The Retirement Board City of Taylor Police and Fire Retirement System Taylor, Michigan

Ramsey County 2016 Financial Overview and Fund Balance Report Summary

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA May 16, 2013

FY 2016 Budget Adoption

Re: Project No. 34-1E Exposure Draft on Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions

TOWN OF SUDBURY OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM ACTUARIAL VALUATION

OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS. GASB STATEMENTS NO. 43 and 45 REPORTING GUIDELINES FOR GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. A Civic Federation Issue Brief

Unlocking the Power of Prefunding to Lower Liabilities, Reduce Costs, and Maximize Assets

AGENDA REPORT. Meeting Date: December 19, 2017 Item Number: F-il To:

CITY OF FREEPORT ACCOUNTING FOR POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PLANS UNDER GASB #45 FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING APRIL 30, 2017

City of Calistoga Staff Report

MSBO Annual Conference Implementing GASB 75. Presented by Chris Geck and Eric Formberg

Pension Funding & Plan Design

8:30 10:00 AM Fiduciary Liability for Fire and Police Pension Plan Trustees and 457 Plan Trustees

TOWN OF KINGSTON, MASSACHUSETTS OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM

Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB)

City of Stockton. Retiree Healthcare Plan June 30, 2007 Actuarial Valuation Executive Summary

ACTUARIAL SURS2015. Letter of Certification. Actuarial Report. Analysis of Funding. Tests of Financial Soundness

A Primer in Public Pensions CITY OF GENEVA CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 20, 2018

Berrien County Road Commission. Financial Report with Supplemental Information September 28, 2017

Mayors & Council Members Executive Forum GASB 74/75 and the Cadillac Tax

GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions for TriMet. As of January 1, Prepared by:

POLICEMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO (A Component Unit of the City of Chicago)

CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL FINANCE. From High to Low: Understanding How the Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System Became Underfunded

Transcription:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN In Compliance with PA 202 of 2017 ADMINISTRATION: Tom Tarkiewicz, City Manager Jon B. Bartlett, Finance Director James Schwartz, Director of Public Safety Kristin Bauer, Director of Public Services Ed Rice, Director of Electric Utility CITY COUNCIL: Jack Reed, Mayor Scott Wolfersberger, Ward 1 Nick Metzger, Ward 2 Brent Williams, Ward 3 Michael McNeil, Ward 4 Robert Costa, Ward 5 Joe Caron, At Large 1 28

INTRODUCTION In December 2017, Public Act 202 of 2017 was signed into law. This new law requires all local governments to annually report its pension s and retiree healthcare unfunded liabilities to the State of Michigan, Department of Treasury, and creates certain criteria to determine if a the local government is in underfunded status. PA 202 creates minimum funding requirements for both pension plans and retiree healthcare plans. Retiree healthcare is also referred to as Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB). In addition, PA 202, provides for standard actuarial assumptions for determining funding status which will be reviewed and published by the Michigan Department of Treasury. If a local unit of government is determined to be underfunded based on PA 202 criteria, the local unit is subject to review by a governor-appointed municipal stability board. This board will review annual reports and corrective action plans of local units required to submit them when the local unit has not been granted a waiver under the Act. The City of Marshall, like many other cities and villages across the State, applied for and was denied a waiver for our retiree healthcare (OPEB) due to its underfunded status. According to our 2017 Audited Financial Statements, the City of Marshall s OPEB is funded at 3.7% which is well under the 40% threshold set by Treasury. This document and all of its attachments serves as the City of Marshall s PA 202 Corrective Action Plan. This action plan will be revisited annually and revised if necessary. 2 29

CITY OF MARSHALL FINANCIAL CONDITIONS Since 2008, Marshall s property tax revenue has seen a steady decline. In 2018, property tax revenue is still below the amount received in 2008 despite a 1.7 mil increase in 2013. $3,500,000 $3,400,000 $3,300,000 PROPERTY TAX REVENUE Axis Title $3,200,000 $3,100,000 $3,000,000 $2,900,000 $2,800,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013* 2014* 2015* 2016* 2017* 2018* * 1.7 mil Increase in 2013 Since 2008, Marshall s state revenue sharing has seen a steady decline. In 2018, state revenue sharing is still below the amount received in 2008. State Revenue Sharing $740,000 $720,000 $700,000 $680,000 $660,000 $640,000 $620,000 $600,000 $580,000 $560,000 $540,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 3 30

CITY OF MARSHALL FINANCIAL CONDITIONS-Cont. As one can see by the graph above, from 2010-2017 actual out-of-pocket (pay as you go) costs for retiree healthcare has increased $234,126. As one can see by the graph above, Defined Benefit Pension costs have increased $807,658 from 2009 to 2018. 4 31

CITY OF MARSHALL FINANCIAL CONDITIONS-Cont. The City of Marshall develops it budget using a 10 year revenue and expense model for all governmental and business type funds. Each specific revenue and expenditure line-item is given an individual inflation factor to which the 10 year budget model is generated. Fund Balance/Net Position is then analyzed for each year and appropriate decisions are made. Below is the projected difference between revenues and expenditures for the City of Marshall s General Fund. The FY 2018 budgeted gap between revenues and expenditures was $138,169 (which included a pay freeze for all non-union employees) while the projected FY 2028 gap is $2,436,608 5 32

RETIREE HEALTHCARE DEMOGRAPHICS ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS LIABILITY $5,595,870 AGE GROUP EMPLOYEES SPOUSES TOTAL 40-45 1 1 2 46-49 1 0 1 50-55 5 2 7 56-59 0 2 2 60-65 2 1 3 66-69 1 1 2 70-75 0 0 0 76-79 0 0 0 80-85 0 0 0 86-89 0 0 0 90+ 0 0 0 TOTAL 10 7 17 Active Only 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 40-45 46-49 50-55 56-59 60-65 66-69 70-75 76-79 80-85 86-89 90+ EMPLOYEES SPOUSES TOTAL 6 33

RETIREE HEALTHCARE DEMOGRAPHICS-Cont. Active participants represent approximately 22% or $5,595,870 of the total OPEB liability of $25,442,509. This liability will grow over time based on the inflation factors surrounding healthcare since retiree healthcare is closed to anyone hired after January 1, 1997. If one was to only look at active participants based on the Plan assets, the level of funding would be 16.80%. INACTIVE PARTICIPANTS LIABILITY $19,846,639 AGE GROUP EMPLOYEES SPOUSES TOTAL 40-45 0 0 0 46-49 0 2 2 50-55 1 5 6 56-59 7 7 14 60-65 14 9 23 66-69 19 9 28 70-75 6 4 10 76-79 3 5 8 80-85 8 4 12 86-89 1 1 2 90+ 0 2 2 TOTAL 59 48 107 30 25 20 15 10 5 Retired - Inactive 0 40-45 46-49 50-55 56-59 60-65 66-69 70-75 76-79 80-85 86-89 90+ EMPLOYEES SPOUSES TOTAL 7 34

RETIREE HEALTHCARE DEMOGRAPHICS-Cont. Inactive participants represent approximately 78% or $19,846,639 of the total OPEB liability of $25,442,509. This liability will grow over time based on the inflation factors surrounding healthcare and active participants retiring but will also decrease based on the age of the group. If the Michigan Department of Treasury is going to give the City of Marshall 30 years to get to the 40% funding level, approximately 85 of the 107 current inactive participants will be between the ages of 90 and 120 years old. ACTIVE & INACTIVE PARTICIPANTS AGE GROUP EMPLOYEES SPOUSES TOTAL 40-45 1 1 2 46-49 1 2 3 50-55 6 7 13 56-59 7 9 16 60-65 16 10 26 66-69 20 10 30 70-75 6 4 10 76-79 3 5 8 80-85 8 4 12 86-89 1 1 2 90+ 1 2 3 TOTAL 70 55 125 8 35

RETIREE HEALTHCARE DEMOGRAPHICS-Cont. Active & Retired 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 40-45 46-49 50-55 56-59 60-65 66-69 70-75 76-79 80-85 86-89 90+ EMPLOYEES SPOUSES TOTAL Based on the same scenario above, if the Michigan Department of Treasury is going to give the City of Marshall 30 years to get to the 40% funding level, approximately 91 of the 125 current active and inactive participants will be between the ages of 90 and 120 years old. 9 36

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN On October 15, 2018, staff will present to Marshall City Council this Corrective Action Plan for the City s Retiree Healthcare Plan (OPEB) for approval prior to filing with the Department of Treasury. Presently the City of Marshall is 3.7% funded for it retiree healthcare liability (OPEB) which was $25,442,509 as of June 30, 2018. The policy of the City, like many other communities, is to pay for retiree healthcare on a pay as you go basis. The City closed retiree healthcare to all employee hired after January 1, 1997. In April 2018, the City s Finance Director asked Watkins Ross, the City s Retiree Healthcare Actuary, how different funding options would affect our funding status. The different funding options were to contribute $200,000, $400,000, or $600,000 per year in addition to the pay as you go healthcare costs. These funds will be transferred to the City s MERS RHVF account at the beginning of each fiscal year starting July 1, 2019. The different funding options and different rates of return are shown on the attached City of Marshall: Contribution Study. COUNCIL ACTION: After hearing staff s presentation on the Retiree Healthcare Corrective Action Plan, it is recommended City Council approve the Additional Retiree Healthcare Contribution Resolution, which will mandate that the City contribute and budget for an additional $200,000 per year into the City s MERS RHVF account. Based on a 6% rate of return this will produce a funding level of 40% in the year 2044. It is also recommended City Council approve the Retiree Healthcare (OPEB) Corrective Action Plan as presented and authorize staff to file the Corrective Action Plan with the Michigan Department of Treasury on or before November 13, 2018 RESOLUTION: 10 37

CITY OF MARSHALL, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION # 2018-XX WHEREAS, the Marshall City Council is fully committed to providing retiree healthcare to those employees that qualify for the benefit; and WHEREAS, the City of Marshall is required to file a corrective action plan with the Michigan Department of Treasury pursuant to PA 202 of 2017 due to the fact that the City s retiree healthcare plan (OPEB) liability is funded at 3.7% and that the criteria set by Treasury is 40%; and WHEREAS, part of the Corrective Action Plan is for the City of Marshall to contribute an additional $200,000 annually in addition to the normal pay as you go retiree healthcare costs, starting July 1, 2019: and WHEREAS, the Directors and the City Manager feel that this additional $200,000 can and will be found within current budget levels; and WHEREAS, this resolution shall remain in effect for the same period of time that the 2018 Retiree Healthcare Corrective Action Plan if approved by the Michigan Department of Treasury. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, in order to reduce the unfunded retiree healthcare liability, in consideration of the financial restrictions of the City of Marshal, the need to provide services to the public, and economic conditions out of the City s control; the City of Marshall shall contribute $200,000 annually to the City s MERS RHFV account. Voting For: Voting Against: Absent: CERTIFICATION OF CITY CLERK I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of a Resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Marshall at a regular meeting held on the 15 th day of October, 2018. Trisha Nelson, City Clerk Date 11 38

City of Marshal ; Contribution Study Year fund reaches 40% of liability Contribution Return\ 200,000 400,000 600,000 4% 2047 2041 2037 6% 2042 2036 2032 7% 2039 2033 2030 Projected benefits and cash contributions Projected 200,000 400,000 600,000 Benefits Contributions =Total Contributions =Total Contributions =Total 2017 943,554 200,000 1,143,554 400,000 1,343,554 600,000 1,543,554 2018 1,059,134 200,000 1,259,134 400,000 1,459,134 600,000 1,659,134 2019 1,111,534 200,000 1,311,534 400,000 1,511,534 600,000 1,711,534 2020 1,225,755 200,000 1,425,755 400,000 1,625,755 600,000 1,825,755 2021 1,306,080 200,000 1,506,080 400,000 1,706,080 600,000 1,906,080 2022 1,393,404 200,000 1,593,404 400,000 1,793,404 600,000 1,993,404 2023 1,465,590 200,000 1,665,590 400,000 1,865,590 600,000 2,065,590 2024 1,534,122 200,000 1,734,122 400,000 1,934,122 600,000 2,134,122 2025 1,625,894 200,000 1,825,894 400,000 2,025,894 600,000 2,225,894 2026 1,693,998 200,000 1,893,998 400,000 2,093,998 600,000 2,293,998 2027 1,772,499 200,000 1,972,499 400,000 2,172,499 600,000 2,372,499 2028 1,871,871 200,000 2,071,871 400,000 2,271,871 600,000 2,471,871 2029 1,948,509 200,000 2,148,509 400,000 2,348,509 600,000 2,548,509 2030 2,033,413 200,000 2,233,413 400,000 2,433,413 600,000 2,633,413 2031 2,124,567 200,000 2,324,567 400,000 2,524,567 600,000 2,724,567 2032 2,200,677 200,000 2,400,677 400,000 2,600,677 600,000 2,800,677 2033 2,306,287 200,000 2,506,287 400,000 2,706,287 600,000 2,906,287 2034 2,400,663 200,000 2,600,663 400,000 2,800,663 600,000 3,000,663 2035 2,473,031 200,000 2,673,031 400,000 2,873,031 600,000 3,073,031 2036 2,564,055 200,000 2,764,055 400,000 2,964,055 600,000 3,164,055 2037 2,652,699 200,000 2,852,699 400,000 3,052,699 600,000 3,252,699 2038 2,724,911 200,000 2,924,911 400,000 3,124,911 2039 2,804,507 200,000 3,004,507 400,000 3,204,507 2040 2,878,136 200,000 3,078,136 400,000 3,278,136 2041 2,944,493 200,000 3,144,493 400,000 3,344,493 2042 3,002,333 200,000 3,202,333 2043 3,050,490 200,000 3,250,490 2044 3,087,836 200,000 3,287,836 2045 3,113,481 200,000 3,313,481 2046 3,126,504 200,000 3,326,504 2047 3,126,222 200,000 3,326,222 39

40

41

42

43

44

45