Rating s Transition & Default Study FY 2016

Similar documents
CARE RATINGS DEFAULT AND TRANSITION STUDY

CIRCULAR. SEBI/ HO/ MIRSD/ DOS3/ CIR/ P/ 2018/ 140 November 13, Sub: Guidelines for Enhanced Disclosures by Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs)

CARE s DEFAULT AND TRANSITION STUDY 2010

Default & Transition Study. July CARE s DEFAULT AND TRANSITION STUDY (For the period March 31, 2005 March 31, 2015) Summary

Rating Rationale Maharashtra Gramin Bank 17th July 2017

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Credit Ratings

SRG Housing Finance Limited

Most Reliable Opinion on Risk. CRISIL Default Study India s first default study validates CRISIL s ratings

CARE s DEFAULT AND TRANSITION STUDY 2009

Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited

Eurotas Infrastructure Limited 10 th Aug 2017

Rating Rationale Paswara Papers Ltd 28 May 2018

On a review of the performance of the Bank, Brickwork Ratings has reaffirmed the Rating 1 for the following instruments of Andhra Bank.

Rating Rationale. Background

Rating Rationale Future Corporate Resources Private Limited (Formerly known as Suhani Trading & Investment Consultants Pvt. Ltd.)

Indian Receivable Trust 2019 Series 5 (Originator: Reliance Home Finance Limited)

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. 30 May 2018

Vastu Housing Finance Corporation Limited

Brickwork Ratings upgrades the ratings for the Non-Convertible Debentures of Crores by JSW Projects Limited

CRISIL default study. Default and rating transitions in February 2017

Rating Rationale Avon Fitness Machines Pvt. Ltd. 10 Aug 2017

Rating Rationale Sri Krishna Engineering & Construction co. 20Apr2018

MSE Ratings. Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Ratings

in Risk CRISIL Default Study 2008 April 2009 Ajay Dwivedi Director CRISIL Ratings Tel.:

BAPL Rototech Pvt. Ltd. 4 May 2018 Brickwork Ratings assigns the rating to the bank loan facilities of Rs.21 Cr of BAPL Rototech Pvt. Ltd.

Brickwork Ratings assigns the ratings for the Bank Loan Facilities of Crores of Rishabh Educational Trust.

Rating Rationale Friends Auto (India) Limited 10 Jan 2019

Brickwork Ratings (BWR) assigns the rating for the proposed facility of Capital First Limited ( CFL or the Company ) as detailed below:

CRISIL Default Study. Default and rating transitions in February 2017

Rating Rationale Heritage Hospitals Limited 8 th Jan 2018

October 10, 2017 I Economics. Credit Quality: H1 FY18

Rating Rationale Paswara Chemicals Ltd 18 May 2018

Re: Update on Credit Rating

Bhaskar Industries Private Limited

Elecon Engineering Company Ltd.

Rating Rationale. Shri Bajrang Power and Ispat Limited 5 Nov 2018

` 750 Cr (out of the rated amount of ` 1500 Cr due to non-utilization)

Brickwork Ratings assigns Rating for the Non-Convertible Debenture Issue of Rs. 160 Cr of Writers and Publishers Private Limited (WPPL) Particulars

TRACK RECORD OF THE PUBLIC ISSUES MANAGED BY THE MERCHANT BANKER IN THE LAST 3 FINANCIAL YEARS NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

Brickwork Ratings reviews the rating to the bank loan facilities of Rs Cr of Aarvee Denim and Exports Ltd.

SRMB Srijan Private Limited (SSL)

Long Term. Outstanding Reaffirmed as follows Information about other outstanding ratings of the issuer with BWR is as follows

Rationale/Description of Key Rating Drivers/Rating sensitivities:

Rating Rationale Ecap Equities Ltd. 16 Nov Brickwork Ratings assigns Rating to the Proposed PP-MLD of Rs. 500 Cr of Ecap Equities Ltd.

Do we have a credit supply problem?

Rating Rationale Sahyadri Agencies Ltd. 29 Nov 2018

Others (15% of the issue size) Coupon 11.75% 12.00% 12.00% Effective yield 11.75% 12.00% 12.00%

GLOBAL CREDIT RATING CO. Rating Methodology. Structured Finance. Global Consumer ABS Rating Criteria Updated April 2014

Writer and Publisher Private Limited

Mapping of the FERI EuroRating Services AG credit assessments under the Standardised Approach

Corporación Andina de Fomento Outlook Revised To Negative On Likelihood Of Venezuela Nonpayment; Ratings Affirmed

Brickwork Ratings upgrades the ratings from BWR BBB+ to BWR A- for Lakshmi Vilas Bank s Long Term Bonds Issue of `250 Crore

Brickwork Ratings reaffirms ratings for the Non-Convertible Debentures/Bonds Issue of Crores of Dolvi Minerals & Metals Pvt. Ltd.

Default, Transition, and Recovery: 2009 Annual Australia and New Zealand Corporate Default Study and Rating Transitions.

Risk and Term Structure of Interest Rates

Publication date: 12-Nov-2001 Reprinted from RatingsDirect

Rationale/Description of Key Rating Drivers/Rating sensitivities:

Infomerics Valuation And Rating Pvt. Ltd.

Pak Oman Asset Management

Amount ( Cr) Tenure years years

Quantifying credit risk in a corporate bond

*The Company raised Rs. 10,000 crores in the Tranche 1 Issue.

CRISIL s ratings and rating scales June 2017

Secondary Contact: Vittoria Ferraris, Milan (39) ; S&P Global Ratings' Base-Case Scenario

Press Release. TDB Spinners Private Limited. May 10, Rating Downgraded. Rating Rationale

CRISIL Composite Bond Fund Index

Fixed-Income Insights

BEST S SPECIAL REPORT

Euler Hermes Rating GmbH. Project Rating Methodology (Real Estate) 30 June 2017

Delaware Life Insurance Co.

International Business Machines Corp.

Corporate Finance. U.S. Corporate Bond Market: A Review of Second-Quarter 2007 Rating and Issuance Activity. Credit Market Research.

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH INVESTING IN BONDS

Rating Rationale. Credit (Rs. Cr) Balance Tenure* (months) Principal Outstanding (Rs. Cr) Instrument. Structure. Remark.

Understanding Investments in Collateralized Loan Obligations ( CLOs )

Mapping of DBRS credit assessments under the Standardised Approach

THE FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES Finance and Facilities Committee April 12, 2018

Federal Home Loan Banks

How are you adapting to a changing muni landscape?

INFOMERICS VALUATION AND RATING PVT LTD.

Primary Credit Analyst: Sadat Preteni, London (44) ;

Illinois Housing Development Authority; Multifamily Whole Loan

4. Credit markets. (Chart 28) Corporate bond spreads (Japan) % points 0.6. Aa A Baa

U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care Sector Medians, Perspective

Standard & Poor s Presentation Virginia GFOA

Credit Rating Agencies ESMA s investigation into structured finance ratings

Euler Hermes Rating GmbH. Methodology: Issuer Rating. 31 May 2016 formally amended on 14 November 2017

Credit Risk II. Bjørn Eraker. April 12, Wisconsin School of Business

Press Release METAROLLS ISPAT PRIVATE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY META ROLLS AND COMMODITIES PRIVATE LIMITED) November 02, 2018.

IL&FS Energy Development Company Limited September 25, Rating 9. CARE BB- [Double B Minus] (credit watch under negative implications)

Security Investment Bank Limited

Crowd-sourced Credit Transition Matrices and CECL

Press Release. ITI Limited. 8 December, Rating Reaffirmed. Rating Rationale

CRISIL s bond fund credit quality ratings criteria. February 2018

Methodology: Business Risk/Financial Risk Matrix Expanded

2016 Adequacy. Bureau of Legislative Research Policy Analysis & Research Section

Investment Grade credit financials versus industrials, as seen by European insurers

Market Focus. Credit cycle: rising default rate. Where do we stand in the default rate cycle? Credit fundamentals are deteriorating

NATIONAL SCALE RATINGS CRITERIA FOR OMAN

Transcription:

Rating s Transition & Default Study FY 2016 www.brickworkratings.com

About Brickwork Ratings Brickwork Ratings India Private Limited (BWR/Brickwork/Brickwork Ratings) began its credit rating operations in 2008 as a SEBI registered credit rating agency. In April 2012, Brickwork Ratings was recognized by the Reserve Bank of India as an eligible credit rating agency to undertake bank loan ratings. With the addition of bank loan ratings to its services offered, Brickwork Ratings has further expanded its ratings base in the market place. About this Publication The Transition and Default Study report is an annual publication of Brickwork Ratings. Brickwork considers analytical excellence, integrity and transparency as its core values in its operations. The report seeks to provide an insight into the rating performance of all ratings assigned by Brickwork Ratings to the investing community and the public at large. All rating rationales are also available on the website of Brickwork Ratings. www.brickworkratings.com Executive Summary The total number of long term ratings assigned by Brickwork Ratings that were outstanding as of 31st March 2016 exceeded over 4200. The ratings distribution has a median of BB. The non-investment grade population of Brickwork Ratings contributes to around 73% of the total rated population for FY16. The Credit Ratings Behavior Ratio (CRBR) is an indication of the rating action trend and is defined as (Rating Upgrades / Rating Downgrades). For the current year the CRBR for the total rated population stood at 2.72 overall. Modified Credit Ratings Behavior Ratio (MCRBR) which is ((Rating Upgrades + Ratings Reaffirmed)/(Rating Downgrades +Ratings Reaffirmed)) for the total rated population stood at 1.09 overall.

Ratings Distribution 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 2014 2015 2016 10% 5% 0% AAA AA A BBB BB B C D The rating distribution as on March 2016 has shifted slightly to the right compared to that of March 2015, with nearly 73% of the total ratings assigned (including structured obligations) falling in the non-investment category. The median of the rating distribution continues to remain in the BB rating category as on March 2016. Credit Ratings Behavior ratio & Modified Credit Ratings Behavior ratio CRBR for the total rated population for the period 2015-16 stood at 2.72 which is a result of 354 upgrades as against 130 downgrades. The MCRBR for the total rating population stood at 1.02 overall. The CRBR calculated should be understood after considering the following: The small rating population of Brickwork Ratings The portfolio of the rated population of Brickwork Ratings The downgrades were primarily due to changes in the financial performance, deteriorating liquidity profiles and delays in debt servicing. The upgrades, on the other hand, were due to strong liquidity profiles, change in management and improved financial performance. While the overall economic growth in 2015-16 was muted, Brickwork Ratings upgraded companies that showed their ability to grow and strengthen their financial and operational performance in adverse conditions.

The following chart shows the upgrade/downgrade details for 2015-16: 400 350 300 250 200 150 Within Investment Grade Movement between Investment and Non-Investment grade Within Non-Investment Grade 100 50 0 Upgardes Downgrades Around 97.5% of the ratings continued to be in the investment/non-investment grades after the rating actions taken. Of the 2.5% of the ratings that shifted between the two, 44 were upgraded from a noninvestment grade to an investment grade while 25 were downgraded from an investment grade to a noninvestment grade. The CRBR should be seen with the stability indicators for a proper analysis and not on a stand-alone basis. The reasons for steep downgrades include inability of the Company to repay debt, stressed liquidity scenarios and certain regulatory concerns. Transition Matrix and Default Study The transition matrix shows the stability rates as well as the percentage of ratings upgraded or downgraded for each rating scale. The highlighted cells indicate the stability rates which reflect the strength of the rating methodology of Brickwork Ratings. Transition Matrix for rated instruments excludes structured finance ratings (only 1 structured finance rating has been assigned by BWR to date). The table below indicates weighted average transition of ratings.

One Year Transition Rate [FY 2012-FY 2016] Table 1.1 BWR AAA BWR AA BWR A BWR BBB BWR BB BWR B BWR C BWR D BWR AAA 94.85% 5.15% BWR AA 0.99% 97.03% 0.99% 0.50% 0.50% BWR A 3.67% 93.33% 0.67% 1.67% 0.33% 0.33% BWR BBB 3.12% 91.72% 3.36% 0.12% 1.68% BWR BB 4.35% 93.25% 1.63% 0.05% 0.71% BWR B 5.49% 92.98% 0.49% 1.04% BWR C 2.20% 17.58% 76.92% 3.30% Three Year Transition Rate [FY 2012-FY 2016] Table 1.2 BWR AAA BWR AA BWR A BWR BBB BWR BB BWR B BWR C BWR D BWR AAA 81.97% 18.03% BWR AA 5.26% 92.11% 1.32% 1.32% BWR A 9.09% 81.82% 4.55% 1.52% 1.52% 1.52% BWR BBB 5.41% 81.08% 6.76% 1.35% 5.41% BWR BB 9.80% 76.47% 11.76% 0.98% 0.98% BWR B 13.95% 79.07% 6.98% BWR C 11.11% 44.44% 33.33% 11.11% AAA stability is less than that of AA because of the small sample size of AAA rated companies. For a small rating population, even one company being downgraded / upgraded can cause a big shift in the stability rate.

BWR Transition and Default Methodology The Transition Rate is calculated across all rating categories over one and three year time period to evaluate behavior of ratings over different time horizon. BWR has adopted long-term rolling-over weighted average approach to assess CDR (Cumulative Default rate) for arriving at one year CDR and three year CDR of the ratings which are reviewed on an ongoing basis. The study tracks long term ratings assigned and accepted by the client/issuer and is issuer specific for bank loan ratings which is a major part of rating population of BWR and also for NCD's/Bonds. The static pool consists of number of ratings outstanding for each rating category as on the beginning of financial year under study. Default behavior of each rating category is examined over one and three year periods. The highlighted cells in Table 1.1 & 1.2 indicate the stability rate across respective rating categories. Cumulative Default Rates One year and Three year Cumulative Default rate (CDR): Table 1.3 Rating Category 1-Year CDR 3-Year CDR AAA or equivalent AA or equivalent 0.50% 1.32% A or equivalent 1.52% BBB or equivalent 1.68% 5.41% BB or equivalent 0.71% 0.98% B or equivalent 1.04% 6.98% C or equivalent 3.30% 11.11% BWR annual default rates are calculated on an issuer basis. One year and three year Cumulative Default rate has been calculated on weighted average basis. Data prior to FY12 is insignificant to be considered for default study as the population was too small, consisting of only bond and NCD ratings of large corporates with hardly any default.

Lorenz curve and Gini Coefficient Ratio Lorenz curve and Gini Coefficient (accuracy ratio) is adopted as a measure to represent the accuracy of the rating exercise by BWR. Following is the Lorenz Curve for the period FY12-FY16 The Lorenz curve (Cumulative Curve) represents the actual scenario vis-à-vis Perfect Scenario. The closer the Lorenz curve is to perfect curve, the better the predictability of ratings. The Gini Coefficient is a ratio which represents the area between the cumulative curve (Lorenz Curve) and random Curve in relation to area between perfect curve and the random curve. This ratio is also called accuracy ratio. If the ratio is nearer to 1, it indicates ratings having better predictive ability, wherein cumulative curve will merge closely with perfect curve. BWR's Gini Coefficient for One year average default for FY 2012-16 was 0.28. Lorenz Curve : FY2012-FY2016 10 A AA AAA BBB 8 Cumulative % of defaults 6 4 B BB 2 C 2 4 6 8 10 Cumulative % of BWR rated population Actual Rating Model Ideal Rating Model Random Rating Model

Disclaimer BWR has taken utmost care in preparing and publishing this study/report. However, BWR does not guarantee accuracy, adequacy or completeness of the information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or the outcome from use of the information. BWR specifically states that it has no liability whatsoever, including financial liability towards anyone on account of use of this report/information. Any use/reproduction of the contents of the report needs prior permission of the publisher. BRICKWORK RATINGS INDIA PVT. LTD. Corporate Office 3rd Floor, Raj Alkaa Park, 29/3 & 32/2 Kalena Agrahara, Bannerghatta Road, Bengaluru - 560 076 Phone : +91 80 4040 9940 Fax: +91 80 4040 9941 Mobile: +91 96118 05999 www.brickworkratings.com