A holistic approach to NPL resolution

Similar documents
Post-crisis bank business models in Central and Southeastern Europe. Erik Berglof Chief Economist European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Kosovo BEEPS-at-a-Glance

Recovery and Challenges in Eastern Europe

Pensions at a Glance: Europe and Central Asia

Non-Performing Loans in CESEE

NPL Regulatory Developments EBA perspective

NPLs in Europe. Cyprus 5 th February 2016 Lars Nyberg

Good Practices for NPL Resolution. Constant Verkoren & Anna Ilyina Vienna, June 26

MIND THE CREDIT GAP. Spring 2015 Regional Economic Issues Report on Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe (CESEE) recovery. repair.

BEEPS At-A-Glance 2008 Slovak Republic

Economic outlook in the Western Balkans

A Strategy for Resolving Europe s Problem Loans Anna Ilyina (IMF)

FINANCIAL SECTOR ADVISORY CENTER (FINSAC)

The Economic Situation in the Transition Economies

Best practice insolvency and creditor rights systems: key for financial stability

A Strategy for Resolving Europe s Problem Loans Bas Bakker, Senior Regional Resident Representative CEE, IMF

Dealing with Non-Performing Loans

The Resolution of Non- Performing Loans in the euro area

NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM PARTIES INCLUDED IN ANNEX I TO THE CONVENTION

SSM action plan on Non- Performing Loans. Frankfurt, 19 September 18

Ukrainian NPL resolution agenda. April 2018

Reducing the European NPL burden Smith Novak Conference, London Tom McAleese, Managing Director

The IMF, CESEE and Banking

BEEPS At-A-Glance 2008 Bosnia and Herzegovina

Why Have Some CESEE Countries Done Better Than Others since Early Transition?

Plenary Meeting of the Sectoral Social Dialogue Sector on Professional Football

The Political Economy of NPLs resolution in Greece: Ownership and Conditionality

THE BANKS INTERNAL WORKOUT: MANAGING DISTRESSED SMES INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES. Tom McAleese Managing Director Head of Bank Restructuring Europe

REDUCING THE BURDEN OF NON-PERFORMING LOANS WITH THE HELP OF THE VIENNA INITIATIVE

EBA Guidelines on non-performing and forborne exposures

1. Introduction. Good morning ladies and gentlemen.

BANKING SECTORS IN THE WESTERN BALKANS

OUT OF COURT RESTRUCTURING PRINCIPLES

Evolving European regulatory landscape for NPLs: how to prepare?

ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANIES AND NON-PERFORMING ASSETS The Asian Experience

Recovery at risk? - CEE external vulnerability and Poland Article IV preliminary conclusions

Regional Economic Issues in CESEE

Non-Performing Loans & Loan Restructuring as a Growth Opportunity

EBA/CP/2018/ March Consultation Paper. Draft Guidelines. on management of non-performing and forborne exposures

Revised Draft. based on. and. INSOLVENCY AND CREDITOR/DEBTOR REGIMES STANDARD Revised 20 Jan 11

Regulations and guidelines 4/2018

5. PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES FOR EFFECTIVE INSOLVENCY AND CREDITOR RIGHTS SYSTEM: ASSESSMENT TEST IN EU MEMBER STATES AND US

SEE macroeconomic outlook Recovery gains traction, fiscal discipline improving. Alen Kovac, Chief Economist EBC May 2016 Ljubljana

BEEPS At-A-Glance 2013 Kyrgyz Republic

CESEE DELEVERAGING AND CREDIT MONITOR 1

Chapter 2 The crisis from the household perspective

CESEE Deleveraging and Credit Monitor 1

Developments and Challenges in EU Financial Market Regulation

Cross-Border Bank Supervision and Resolution: The Home-Host Dilemma for Significant-Material Subsidiaries from a Small Host State Perspective

EU Membership: A Post-Accession Boom, but New Policy Challenges

EBA/GL/2018/10 17/12/2018. Final Report. Guidelines. on disclosure of non-performing and forborne exposures

CARDS 2004 NEIGHBOURHOOD PROGRAMME

CONSULTATION DOCUMENT STATUTORY PRUDENTIAL BACKSTOPS ADDRESSING INSUFFICIENT PROVISIONING FOR NEWLY ORIGINATED LOANS THAT TURN NON-PERFORMING

Type of comment Detailed comment Concise statement why your comment should be taken on board

Main Risks for Belarussian Economy and Prospects for Belarus-IMF cooperation

11173/17 PK/vc 1 DGG1B

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Sovereign debt restructuring Benu Schneider

Banking Sector Dynamics

World Developments in Insolvency Regulation

Response from the Hellenic Bank Association to the draft ECB guidance to banks on non-performing loans

Insolvency and Creditor/Debtor Regimes Report (ICR ROSC) Romania Key challenges in the restructuring and insolvency framework REORGANIZATION

EBRD Communications Sector Assessment Conference. Activities of the TMT Team. 29 May 2009 Tbilisi

TRANSITION REPORT tr-ebrd.com

UK response to European Commission consultation on a new European regime for Venture Capital

Uma Ramakrishnan. Regional mechanisms and international financial architecture November 16, 2010 New York

State Involvement and Economic Growth

Notes on Financial Stability and Supervision

DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS MULTI ANNUAL EVALUATION PROGRAMME. Evaluations planned for Years

Banking union: restoring financial stability in the Eurozone

Gaps in the Architecture for Sovereign Debt Restructuring

Preliminary Group Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2015

A STUDY OF EUROPEAN EQUITY MARKETS INTEGRATION USING MULTIVARIATE DATA ANALYSIS

RESULTS OF APPLIED COLLECTION MANAGEMENT MODEL SERBIAN CASE

Feedback statement. Responses to the public consultation on the draft ECB guidance to banks on non-performing loans

NAMA The Irish experience eight years along the road Jamie Bourke 30th October 2017

FINANCIAL STABILITY SOVEREIGN DEBT ECONOMIC GROWTH

International Standards & Best Practice in Insolvency and Creditor. Rights

The use of Restructuring to preserve value.

Resolving non-performing loans in Europe. July 2017

BEST PRACTICES FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FACING CHALLENGES IN EFFECTIVELY AND EFFICIENTLY MANAGING NON-PERFORMING LOANS JULY 2016

Yannis Stournaras: Sources of financing of the Greek economy

Forum for Asian Insolvency Reform (FAIR) MAXIMISING VALUE OF NON- PERFORMING ASSETS

NPL framework. European Banking Authority, European Central Bank and European Commission. Research and Development.

Brussels, COM(2018) 767 final

Announcement. Audited Group Financial Results for the year ended 31 December Nicosia, 31 March 2016

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

International Monetary and Financial Committee

Technical Assistance to Greece

THE EURO AREA AT A CROSSROADS

Banking Resolution Spanish experience. Future implications of BRRD.

Slovakia in Figures

Announcement. Group Financial Results for the year ended 31 December Nicosia, 28 March Key Highlights

The issue of non-performing loans (NPLs) is putting pressure on the European banking sector and is seen as one of the main reasons behind the low

International Monetary and Financial Committee

OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK. of 17 December on emergency stabilisation of credit institutions (CON/2010/92)

EM Banks: Managing the Credit Build-Up

How are Member States implementing Articles 7 and 8 of the Energy Efficiency Directive? Anna-Liisa Kaar and Rebecca Turner 7 September 2017

PRIVATE DEBT AND THE ESTIA SCHEME

NPL resolution in the case of Romania

Transcription:

A holistic approach to NPL resolution FinSAC NPL conference Karlis Bauze Senior Financial Sector Specialist, FinSAC, World Bank Group Vienna, Austria, May 15-16, 2018

NPL resolution needs a holistic approach Only a coordinated work of private and public sector stakeholders could bring meaningful results in NPL reduction Banks have the primary responsibility in NPL resolution at individual level and should ensure time bound and efficient NPL workout Public sector authorities should set a comprehensive and clear framework for NPL reduction (workout) in the system in order to remove impediments for financial stability and economic growth 2

NPL resolution is a complicated task with many institutions involved External auditors Others Accounting standard setters Tax authorities Regulator NPLs NPL investors Bank 2 MoF Bank 1 MoJ MoE Regulator: regulation on credit risk, loan provisioning, migration of loans from NPL to performing category, income recognition on NPLs, NPL resolution targets per bank MoF: usually a lead institution for the financial crisis resolution, tax legislation (CIT, PIT, VAT), other initiatives MoJ: corporate and personal insolvency laws, out-of-court resolution, bailiffs regulation, improvements in judicial system MoE: foreign investors, economic growth, SME loans Bank 1 and 2: provisioning of NPLs, internal NPL resolution (workout) units, multi-lender cases, financial statements are prepared in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework NPL investors: access to market, availability of NPL servicing platforms, licensing, NPL pricing gap Others: regulation of appraisers and methodology for appraisal of immovable assets Tax authorities: tax debts, super-priority of claims External auditors: deliver quality bank audits which foster market confidence in banks financial statements and provide audited statements of corporations Accounting standard setters: deliver a set of accounting policies, valuation norms and disclosure requirements, based on which financial statements should be prepared 3

Different experiences with NPL resolution The economic and financial crisis hit many EU countries in 2008 Latvia, Ireland, and Greece had IMF, EC, and ECB programs The countries chose to apply different crisis and economic resolution methods: one of the most successful was in Latvia quick and decisive decisions with substantial short term economic pain (internal adjustment); Ireland started decisively but structural problems were deeper; Greece had substantial structural problems and opted for a slow reform process leading to protracted economic and financial difficulties. A holisctic approach to NPL resolution and ownership of reforms matter Source: IMF, Financial Soundness Indicators 4

Stages of NPL resolution Timely recognition Adequate provisioning Segmentation Targeted action Four basic NPL resolution blocs are essential for a successful tackling of impaired assets All of them require serious consideration Banks and regulators play crucial role in the resolution process The proper recognition and valuation of NPLs is bank s primary responsibility Regulators should set an unambiguous framework for NPL resolution More prescriptive and intrisuve regulation is justified in case of a systemic NPL problem 5

NPL resolution at individual banks available options SEGMENTATION: Viable Non-viable RESTRUCTURING: Debt workouts - bilateral or multilateral forbearances, rescheduling, restructurings (terms and collateral) Voluntary out-of-court corporate and financial debt restructuring more comprehensive to restore viability to the business, including both financial and operational restructuring SALE OR TRANSFER of distressed loans at discount to third parties or AMC COLLECTION: Foreclosure, execution and enforcement Bankruptcy liquidation proceedings Write-offs - To select the most cost efficient options, an NPV calculation should be done for all available options. The calculation must include all costs associated with a selected option, including the costs of internal or external workout unit (e.g., internal - human resources, IT, legal expenses- or external asset storage costs, advisory or other services) - Depending on bank s NPL resolution strategy, it might conduct NPL workouts (i) internally; (ii) create an external SPV; or (iii) outsource the process to a third party (with pre-determined profit sharing plan or investent contribution) or decide to sell all or part of its NPL portfolio 6

Real case NPL resolution country X and country Y Option Country Slovenia X Country Ukraine Y Restructure 81,215 80,673 Loan Sale 82,500 73,500 Enforcement 54,881 34,673 Insolvency 61,955 8,584 Source: FinSAC calculations, based on the World Bank Doing Business index data 2017 Options for NPL resolution should be considered on NPV basis In countries with high interest rates, time value is very important Insolvency is almost not an option in country Y Calibration of discount rate is a very sensitive issue 7

Enabling environment for NPLs matters Recovery rate and cost of insolvency Time and cost of collateral enforcement 45 1800 Cost (% of estate) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 UKR SER BEL SLO KOS HUN CRO TRK CZK LIT CYP ALB POL MOL ARM AZE LAT ECA ROM R² = 0.1442 OECD MON MAC SLOVEN GRE BUL BiH RUS GEO EST 0 20 40 60 80 100 Recovery rate Time (days) 1500 1200 900 600 300 0 GRE SLOVEN CYP CRO OECD TRK LAT SLO HUN POL CZK BUL MON MAC BiH SER MOL ALB ARM EST UKR ECA RUS AZE ROM GEO KOS R² = 0.1148 LIT BEL 10 20 30 40 50 Cost (% of claim) Source: FinSAC calculations, based on the World Bank Doing Business index data 2018 8

An example of a country assessment The assessment was based on the 3 pillar approach and 17 areas were analysed In this specific case, 11 areas were identified with negative scores above 3.5 (circled with red) Priority status of recommended improvements was assigned to these areas Source: ECB Stocktake of national supervisory practices and legal frameworks related to NPLs, WB estimates Charts interpretation: score 5 stands for the worst NPL framework, whereas 0 score stands the best practice NPL framework 9

Many thanks for your attention! Karlis Bauze FinSAC web site: http://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/financial-sector-advisory-center#1 NPL Initiative under Vienna Initiative: http://npl.vienna-initiative.com/