Consideration of the structures and techniques of risk sharing in cash balance pension plans. Yoshinori Ueta

Similar documents
イラン : グローバル企業に向けたビジネス機会と投資分析. フロスト & サリバン An Outlook on Opportunities in Iran for Global Clients and Frost & Sullivan Offerings

How to complete form B

Claim for Old Age / Disability Pension

Japan update of XBRL tagged-data and future possibilities of CPA practice

Annual Report on the Japanese Economy and Public Finance 2018

OUTLINE OF 2004 PENSION SYSTEM REVISION

Document and entity information

Challenges of Longevity Risk to Pension Systems and Financial Markets in Taiwan

Challenge of Japanese Small and Mid-sized Companies Pension Plan

Corporation Tax Act (Act No. 34 of 1965) (Limited to the provisions related to foreign corporations)

Income Tax Act (Act No. 33 of 1965) (Limited to the provisions related to nonresidents and foreign corporations)

6 贈与税 (1) 課税状況 ( 合計分 ) Statistics of taxation (Total) 医療法人持分税額控除額 Amount of tax credit for interests in medical corporations Statistics of Taxation -

Financial Constraints Driving Healthcare Reform in Japan. Toshihiko Takeda Former Director-General, Health Policy Bureau, MHLW, Japan

January 2018 Middle East and Africa Division Overseas Research Department Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO)

Summary of the Fiscal Loan Fund Management Report for FY July 25, 2017 Financial Bureau, Ministry of Finance

World Economic Trends The 2015 Autumn Report (Summary) Cabinet Office Chapter 1 Chinese Economic Slowdown and the World Economy

Japan Investor Relations Association 日本 IR 協議会 IR カンファレンス 2008 信頼される IR コミュニケーションの実現に向けて. 講師 :Rittenhouse Rankings Inc.

欧州国債市場の流動性指標 2014 年 5 月 14 日宇野淳早稲田大学大学院ファイナンス研究科. Liquidity Measures of Sovereign Bond Markets: In case of Euro Crisis

GASB #34 Model: Fund Financial Statements

Ashikaga Holdings Co.,Ltd.

THE IMPLICATIONS OF LONGEVITY FOR RISK-SHARING IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PENSION SCHEMES

No. 161 : Thailand s New Labor Law Amendment No.6 B.E.2560(2017)

建設産業情報 ( 最近の動向 ) 在ポーランド日本国大使館 1. 現地の建設工事に係る経済情報. ( ポーランド語のみ,2012 年の公共事業の契約状況等の年間報告 ) URL: 2. 建設業制度 入札契約制度の改正動向なし

Protection of Participants and the Pension Benefit Guarantee Program of Japan

Annual Report on the Japanese Economy and Public Finance 2017

インドネシア : 海外への支払に租税条約を適用する際の居住者証明新フォーム

Form of Construction Contract under JICA s Grants

Fukuoka Financial Group, Inc. Financial Digest for the First Quarter of FY2018

租税特別措置法 Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation

2016 White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan (outline)

Cash, Receivables & Marketable Securities

SOCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT FOR MITIGATING SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS FROM NATURAL DISASTERS

Meeting Materials for First-Half of FY2018

The diversity of pension plans and their accounting liabilities

Title: Funding Standards and Protection of Benefit Rights. Organization: Japanese Society of Certified Pension Actuaries

Comment on Evolution of the Business Groups in Korea and China by Keun Lee. Hiroyuki Odagiri 16 May 2013, at RIETI

Indonesia s New Insurance Law

JPMorgan Funds - Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund Schedule of Investments As at 30 June 2018

Investment Trends and Special Measures for Flood Affected Companies

Cash Balance Pension Plan in Japan Current Situation and Future

2018 年第二季業績報告. Aug. 2018

Document and entity information

Cash Balance Pension Plans in Japan

保険監督者国際機構 (IAIS) の国際資本基準 (ICS) バージョン 2.0 に関する損保協会意見

Ashikaga Holdings Co., Ltd.

Fiscal Policy in Japan

Web Billing User Guide

Survey Report on Japan-based Companies Operating in the San Francisco Bay Area

Purpose and System of Public Pension Fund Management

Strategic Client Solutions. Working with clients to provide bespoke portfolio solutions

The impact and implication of the 2016 pension legislative revision in Japan

JI Travel Accidents (Ex Gratia. Copayment 0 1 million Expenses / Rescuer Expenses /AccidentResponse Expenses

BASIC FINANCIAL RATIO ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATION

Presentation Materials for the Earnings Briefing for the Year Ended September 2017

International Financial Symposium Feb.22, years after the Global Financial Crisis-How has the world economy changed and where will it go?

New Trend of severance and retirement benefits in Japan Yoshihiro Oyama

金融デリバティブ - 金融の重要概念 - 全 4 巻 Financial Derivatives: Critical Concepts in Finance. 4 vols.

現金 その他の資産 ( 負債控除後 ) 合計 ( 純資産 ) 金額 構成比 金額 構成比 金額 構成比 百万円 % 2016 年 9 月期 千口 1,958,700 2,107,450 百万円 27,157,099 22,020, , ,554

Fixed Income. Drawing on a spectrum of global fixed income opportunities to meet a range of client goals. September 2018

平成 25 年 1 月 18 日 2012 年 12 月期 年次決算短信 会 社 名 バンク オブ アメリカ コーポレーション (Bank of America Corporation)

Outline ( 骨子 ) The lecture will cover the following topics: What is risk assessment? Concept of residual risk What is Risk-Informed Decision Making(RI

Product Strategy for the Corporate Market Group Pension Insurance

Community Disaster Management Plan System

Guide to Japanese Personal Taxes

INVESTMENT MARKETBEAT

New Retirement Plan Designs for the 21 st Century SOA 2008 Retirement 20/20 Conference

P/L Trends 1 millions of yen , 8, 7, 1 millions of yen 6 6, 5 5, 4 4, 3 2 3, 1 2, -1 FY1 FY2 FY3 FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7 FY8 FY9 FY1 FY11 売上総利益 Gross P

Strategy. Overview of Three-Year Management Plan Zen Shin (Fiscal )

The Pension Protection Fund

Investors Guide Contents. Year ended March 31, 2014

Modelling member outcomes. Proposed changes issued for consultation: 1/75ths accrual rate, 55,000 salary threshold, employee contribution rate of 8%

銘傳大學九十一學年度轉學生招生考試八月四日第三節會計轉三會計學 ( 二 ) 試題

Outlook for Japanese Economy in 2018

2008 INCOME TAX GUIDE

Japanese Fintech in the Global Context. Deloitte Tohmatsu Consulting LLC October 23

Chapter 12 Introduction to Asset Liability Management

Determinants of Regional Headquarters of MNCs in Asia

Financial Results for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2007 (FY06) Business Plan for the Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2008 (FY07) April 27, 2007

FY2018 1st Half Earnings Release

Notice for Assistance with School Attendance Fees for Fiscal Year 2014

Figure 1: Current Retirement Systems in Japan

Financial Results. for 1 st half of FY2013. Nov 13, 2013

Source: The Study on Flood Control Project Implementation System for Principal Rivers in the Philippines undertaken by JICA, September 2004 図 1.

2010 INCOME TAX GUIDE

アコム株式会社 ACOM CO., LTD.

2018 2Q IR PRESENTATION

45% Imports Exports 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 0% Canada France Germany Italy Japan U.K. U.S.

Document and entity information

Selecting Discount Rates for Assessing Funded Status of Target Benefit Plans

Retirement Program Options for Professional Firms Benefits and Risks

FAX またはご郵送でのお申し込みについて

Key Issues and Recommendations

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

wish to apply for a Canadian Old Age Security pension or a Canada Pension Plan Retirement, Survivor s, Surviving Child s or Death benefit,

The future of occupational pensions in Japan

Japanese-Finnish Research Cooperative Program on Information Systems for Accessibility and Support of Older People

Japanese Public Finance Fact Sheet

SinoPac Holdings. Non-deal Roadshow by Credit Suisse

FACT BOOK 2016 年 9 月期. For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2016 東証 1 部 (4554)

Japanese-Chinese Research Cooperative Program on Genomics of Biodiversity: Exploring the Formation Mechanisms and Conservation of Biodiversity

Transcription:

Consideration of the structures and techniques of risk sharing in cash balance pension plans Yoshinori Ueta

Contents( 目次 ) 1.Introduction of CBP in Japan ( 日本におけるCBP 導入 ) 2.Japanese CBP and NAC ( 日本のCBPとNAC) 3.Structure of Risk Sharing ( リスク分担の構造 ) 4.Structure of BRP (BRPの仕組み) 5.Future tasks ( 今後の課題 )

1.Introduction of CBP in Japan(1) Japanese Corporate Pension Scheme Date Corporate Pension Scheme 1962- Tax-Qualified Pension Plan(TQPP) 2012 ( 税制適格年金制度 ) 1966- Employee's Pension Fund(EPF) ( 厚生年金基金制度 ) 2001.10- Defined Contribution Pension Plan(DB) ( 確定拠出年金制度 ) 2002.4- Defined Benefit Corporate Pension Plan(DC) ( 確定給付企業年金制度 )

1.Introduction of CBP in Japan(2) Japanese Corporate Pension Scheme Reform Before 2000 After 2001 EPF EPF DB Plans DB TQPP TQPP ( ) DC Plans DC TQPP will be expired by March 2012. Other

1.Introduction of CBP in Japan(3) Cash Balance Pension Plan(CBP) Defined Benefits Corporate Pension Act(DB Act) EPF DB Permitted to design benefits by CBP TQPP Not permitted to design benefits by CBP

1.Introduction of CBP in Japan(4) In case of transfer of TQPP, plan sponsors have chosen CBP in many cases. Reason: This choise results in the mitigation of the volatility of the projected benefit obligation(pbo). When the economic environment turns bad, the benefits by CBPs will not grow as much in comparison with the conventional defined benefit pension plans.

1.Introduction of CBP in Japan(5) Review of risk sharing(investment Risk) Perfect Storm(2000-2002) DB Act and DC Act were enacted. (Permitted to design benefits by CBP) Subprime Crisis Lehman Shock(2007-2008) JSCPA began to examine expansion of the Hybrid-type Pension Plan, including Benchmark Related Pension Plans (BRPs).

2.Japanese CBP and NAC(1) NAC = ΣNotional principal credits + ΣInterest credits ΣInterest credits : Don't decrease Revaluation rate 1st 1 2nd 3rd Nth Accumulated amount of Interest credits part of a by-product of work. Accumulated amount of Notional principal credits part of a reflection of the health of the economic environment

2.Japanese CBP and NAC(2) Amount of annuity current price rate (based on a guaranteed period and annuity conversion rate) NAC it is allowed to revise the amount of pensions annually using revaluation rates. at commencement of the annuity payments guaranteed period Amount of annuity (Temporary annuity)

2.Japanese CBP and NAC(3) Revaluation rate (in Japan) <legally-recognized options> 1 2 3 4 Fixed rate the interest rate of the government bond etc. (Consumer Price Index, Wage rate Index) Combination of 1 and 2 2 or 3 provided that this choice dose not go beyond the upper or lower bounds Don't fall below 0 In many cases, the yield of the government bond is used.

2.Japanese CBP and NAC(4) Other features In many cases, for coefficient according to retirement reason, lump sum benefits decreases more than NAC. In many cases, Temporary annuity (Not whole life annuity)

3.Structure of Risk Sharing(1) Risks in Pension Plan(1) Investment Risk( 投資リスク ) <DB> this risk is that the plan sponsor might be required to pay an additional burden when RORs fall below the expected ROR assumed in contribution calculations <DC> this risk is that the employee's future benefit might become smaller than expected when the actual RORs fall below the expected RORs ROR : rate of investment return Reference:Shimizu Nobuhiro[2006], "Reinventing the Risk Sharing Mechanism of Defined Benefit Pension Plans"

3.Structure of Risk Sharing(2) Risks in Pension Plan(2) Longevity Risk(Annuity Conversion Risk) <plan sponsor>(whole life annuity) this risk is that the actual amount of annuities every year exceeds the amount of the expectation when the results mortality rate to fall below the expected one because the annuitants live long. <employees and pension recipients>(temporary annuity) this risk is that the original capital for old age is insufficient when they live longer than one expects and that financial capital to maintain their livelihoods in old age might need to be increased.

3.Structure of Risk Sharing(3) Risks in Pension Plan(3) Mortality rate improvement Risk( 死亡率改善リスク ) This risk is that the plan sponsor might be required to pay an additional burden when mortality rates might improve beyond expectation and future benefits might be higher than expected.

3.Structure of Risk Sharing(4) Risks in Pension Plan(4) Earnings Increase Risk( 昇給リスク ) <plan sponsor> This risk is that the plan sponsor might be required to pay an additional burden when earnings increase faster than expected and future benefits are higher than expected. (This risk becomes larger in final earnings pension plans. ) <pension recipients> this risk is that the income substitution rate for the real wages might fall when the wage of active employees rises. <employees> this risk is that the income substitution rate for the real wages might fall when the wage growth rate is less than the inflation rate.

3.Structure of Risk Sharing(5) Risks in Pension Plan(5) Inflation Risk( インフレリスク ) This risk is that the real value of benefits might be reduced due to inflation. (this risk becomes large in such cases where the amounts of benefits are proportionate to one s career average earnings and past earnings are not revalued.) Default Risk( デフォルトリスク ) This risk is that the rights of participants to receive benefits might be partially or completely lost when the plan sponsor becomes insolvent and the pension plan is forced to be terminated or to be dissolved.

3.Structure of Risk Sharing(6) Risk Sharing in CBP Investment Risk Ernings Increase Risk Those Risks are improved in comparison to the final earnings pension plan.

4.Structure of BRP(1) Problem of CBP Benefits : change according to the yield curve Asset management: ROR can't completely synchronize with the yield curve used. Investment Risk:plan sponsor

4.Structure of BRP(2) Benchmark Related Plan(BRP) [Under consideration in JSCPA] Difference point with CBP Revaluation rate Combined benchmark index rate of return Employees and plan sponsor mutual agreement Interest credits It is possible to fall below 0. Lower bound of ΣInterest credits : 0 Amount of annuity a different of method for deciding the amount of the annuity

4.Structure of BRP(3) NAC = ΣNotional principal credits + ΣInterest credits Lower bound of ΣInterest credits : 0 Revaluation rate Accumulated amount of Interest credits Accumulated amount of Notional principal credits 1st 1 2nd 3rd Nth

4.Structure of BRP(4) Amount of annuity (Temporary annuity) Accumulat ed amount of Interest credits Accumulat ed amount of Notional principal credits NAC at commencement of the annuity payments current price rate (based on a residual period and annuity conversion rate) annuity NAC This paper's Method annuity amount =NAC /current price rate annuity NAC guaranteed period JSCPA Report's Method annuity amount =NAC /residual period Lowest guarantee annuity : ΣNotional principal credits /residual period NAC annuity

Appendix Example of Amount of Annuity Changing in BRP Example1 Method for Deciding the Amount of the Annuity : This Paper's Method (Temporary Annuity(guaranteed period : 15 years)) Year NAC (at end of previous year) Annity (per year) Residual Rest of period year Notional Notional (at end of CBROR Interest Interest principal Total principal Total previous year) 1 15 3.0% 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 100,000 128,898 228,898 2 14 3.0% 1,400,000 1,461,102 2,861,102 100,000 131,699 231,699 3 13 3.0% 1,300,000 1,415,236 2,715,236 100,000 134,571 234,571 4 12 3.0% 1,200,000 1,362,122 2,562,122 100,000 137,523 237,523 5 11 3.0% 1,100,000 1,301,463 2,401,463 100,000 140,565 240,565 6 10 3.0% 1,000,000 1,232,942 2,232,942 100,000 143,711 243,711 7 9 3.0% 900,000 1,156,219 2,056,219 100,000 146,979 246,979 8 8 3.0% 800,000 1,070,927 1,870,927 100,000 150,392 250,392 9 7 3.0% 700,000 976,663 1,676,663 100,000 153,985 253,985 10 6 3.0% 600,000 872,978 1,472,978 100,000 157,808 257,808 11 5 3.0% 500,000 759,359 1,259,359 100,000 161,945 261,945 12 4 3.0% 400,000 635,195 1,035,195 100,000 166,536 266,536 13 3 3.0% 300,000 499,715 799,715 100,000 171,868 271,868 14 2 3.0% 200,000 351,838 551,838 100,000 178,651 278,651 15 1 3.0% 100,000 189,742 289,742 100,000 189,742 289,742 Annuity conversion rate : 2.0% minmum: 128,898 maximum: 189,742 average: 152,992 Note:

Example2 Method for Deciding the Amount of the Annuity : JSCPA Report's Method (Temporary Annuity(guaranteed period : 15 years)) Year Residual NAC (at end of previous year) Annity (per year) Rest of period year Notional Notional (at end of CBROR Interest Interest principal Total principal Total previous year) 1 15 3.0% 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 2 14 3.0% 1,400,000 1,490,000 2,890,000 100,000 106,429 206,429 3 13 3.0% 1,300,000 1,470,271 2,770,271 100,000 113,098 213,098 4 12 3.0% 1,200,000 1,440,281 2,640,281 100,000 120,023 220,023 5 11 3.0% 1,100,000 1,399,466 2,499,466 100,000 127,224 227,224 6 10 3.0% 1,000,000 1,347,226 2,347,226 100,000 134,723 234,723 7 9 3.0% 900,000 1,282,920 2,182,920 100,000 142,547 242,547 8 8 3.0% 800,000 1,205,861 2,005,861 100,000 150,733 250,733 9 7 3.0% 700,000 1,115,304 1,815,304 100,000 159,329 259,329 10 6 3.0% 600,000 1,010,434 1,610,434 100,000 168,406 268,406 11 5 3.0% 500,000 890,341 1,390,341 100,000 178,068 278,068 12 4 3.0% 400,000 753,983 1,153,983 100,000 188,496 288,496 13 3 3.0% 300,000 600,106 900,106 100,000 200,035 300,035 14 2 3.0% 200,000 427,074 627,074 100,000 213,537 313,537 15 1 3.0% 100,000 232,349 332,349 100,000 232,349 332,349 minmum: 100,000 maximum: 232,349 average: 155,666 Note:

Example3 Method for Deciding the Amount of the Annuity : This Paper's Method (Temporary Annuity(guaranteed period : 15 years)) Year NAC (at end of previous year) Annity (per year) Residual Rest of period year Notional Notional (at end of CBROR Interest Interest principal Total principal Total previous year) 1 15-10.0% 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 100,000 128,898 228,898 2 14-10.0% 1,400,000 1,071,102 2,471,102 100,000 100,116 200,116 3 13-10.0% 1,300,000 723,876 2,023,876 100,000 74,844 174,844 4 12-10.0% 1,200,000 446,644 1,646,644 100,000 52,653 152,653 5 11-10.0% 1,100,000 229,327 1,329,327 100,000 33,165 133,165 6 10-10.0% 1,000,000 63,229 1,063,229 100,000 16,045 116,045 7 9-10.0% 900,000 0 900,000 100,000 0 100,000 8 8-10.0% 800,000 0 800,000 100,000 0 100,000 9 7-10.0% 700,000 0 700,000 100,000 0 100,000 10 6-10.0% 600,000 0 600,000 100,000 0 100,000 11 5-10.0% 500,000 0 500,000 100,000 0 100,000 12 4-10.0% 400,000 0 400,000 100,000 0 100,000 13 3-10.0% 300,000 0 300,000 100,000 0 100,000 14 2-10.0% 200,000 0 200,000 100,000 0 100,000 15 1-10.0% 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 0 100,000 Annuity conversion rate : 2.0% minmum: 0 maximum: 128,898 average: 27,048 Note:

Example4 Method for Deciding the Amount of the Annuity : JSCPA Report's Method (Temporary Annuity(guaranteed period : 15 years)) Year NAC (at end of previous year) Annity (per year) Residual Rest of period year Notional Notional (at end of CBROR Interest Interest principal Total principal Total previous year) 1 15-10.0% 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 2 14-10.0% 1,400,000 1,100,000 2,500,000 100,000 78,571 178,571 3 13-10.0% 1,300,000 771,429 2,071,429 100,000 59,341 159,341 4 12-10.0% 1,200,000 504,945 1,704,945 100,000 42,079 142,079 5 11-10.0% 1,100,000 292,372 1,392,372 100,000 26,579 126,579 6 10-10.0% 1,000,000 126,556 1,126,556 100,000 12,656 112,656 7 9-10.0% 900,000 1,244 901,244 100,000 138 100,138 8 8-10.0% 800,000 0 800,000 100,000 0 100,000 9 7-10.0% 700,000 0 700,000 100,000 0 100,000 10 6-10.0% 600,000 0 600,000 100,000 0 100,000 11 5-10.0% 500,000 0 500,000 100,000 0 100,000 12 4-10.0% 400,000 0 400,000 100,000 0 100,000 13 3-10.0% 300,000 0 300,000 100,000 0 100,000 14 2-10.0% 200,000 0 200,000 100,000 0 100,000 15 1-10.0% 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 0 100,000 minmum: 0 maximum: 100,000 average: 21,291 N t

5.Future tasks Countermeasure of the fluctuation of benefit by economic environment before the time of resignation Lower Bound of NAC (at The Time of Resignation) and Annuity Method for Calculating Liability in Pension Financing and Retirement Benefit Accounting Further review of risk sharing (Countermeasure of Longevity Risk)