New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Oak Creek, WI's $10M General Obligation Promissory Notes

Similar documents
New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Oak Creek, WI's $2.7M GO Bonds, Ser. 2014B

City of Oak Creek, WI

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa to Bronxville NY's $5.2M GO Bonds

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa rating to the Village of Glenview's (IL) $18.6 million General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2012A

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa rating to Livingston County's (MI) $2.4 million

New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 rating to Topeka's (KS) $25M GO Temp Notes, Ser A; Aa3 to $9.8M GO Ser B and $5.0M GO Ser.

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 rating to Tustin Unified School District (USD) School Facilities Improvement District's (SFID) (CA) GO Bonds

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Framingham, MA's $43.9M GO bonds, MIG 1 to $4.4M GO BANs

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa1 rating to Hartford MDC's (CT) $58.9 million General Obligation Bonds, Issue of 2013, Series A & B; outlook is stable

New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN

New Issue: Moody's upgrades Edgewater, NJ's GO to Aa2: assigns MIG 1 to $15.4M in BANs

New Issue: Moody's revises Pittsburgh PA's outlook to positive; affirms A1

Rating Update: Moody's affirms Aa3 on Waukegan Park District, IL's GO debt

A1 underlying rating affects $10.97 million in outstanding parity debt, inclusive of the current sale UNDERLYING RATING

Global Credit Research - 24 Feb 2012 ASSIGNS A2 RATING TO $24.6 MILLION G.O. BONDS, 2012 SERIES A & B

Montgomery County, TX

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa1 to Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District's (MO) $150M on Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2013B

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 to Ford County USD No. 443's (KS) GOs Series 2015-A and Series 2015-B

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 to Grays Harbor County Public Utility District 1 (WA) electric revenue bonds

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

New Issue: Moody's assigns an underlying Aa1 rating to Alpine School District, UT's G.O. bonds

Lubbock (City of), TX

Celina Independent School District, TX

Rockwall County, TX. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Above average socioeconomic indices. Credit Challenge

Westport (Town of) CT

Rating Update: Moody's upgrades Central Falls' (RI) GO rating to Ba3 from B1; outlook is stable

Huffman Independent School District, TX

Montgomery County, TX

Rating Update: Moody's upgrades Inglewood's, CA, issuer rating to A1 from A2; upgrades to Baa1 the city's lease revenue bonds and POBs

City of Mesquite, TX

West Fargo Public School District No. 6, ND

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Butler (Village of), WI

New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN

Park District of La Grange, IL

Columbia School District, MO

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa2 UND/Aa3 ENH to Roswell ISD (Chaves County), NM's GOULT bonds, Ser Sep 2018

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa3 ratings to State of Connecticut G.O. Bonds; outlook is stable

Rating Action: Moody's Affirms A3 Rating on American Municipal Power, Inc. Meldahl Hydroelectric Revenue Bonds; Outlook Stable

Cherokee County Board of Education, AL

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Hoover (City of), AL

Moody s Upgrades Montco s Outlook

AGENDA ADJOURNED PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING. New Ulm, Minnesota CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS. June 4, : 30 P. M.

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa3 rating to Brevard County School Board's (FL) $82.2 million COPs, Series 2013 A&B

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades SURA Asset Management to Baa1; outlook stable

Announcement: Moody's Disclosures on Credit Ratings of Barbados, Government of Global Credit Research - 26 Mar 2012

Ci1r of' SACRAMENTO. O ffice of t he City Treasu rer. Russell Fehr~ City Treasurer ADDITIONAL (VOLUNTARY) DISCLOSURE RATING AFFIRMED

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Special Tax: Transportation-Related

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa1 to $450M of Massachusetts GO bonds; outlook stable

Newport News, VA. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Strong financial management. Credit Challenges. Below average demographics

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

Cocoa (City of) FL. Update to credit analysis following assignment of Aa2 issuer rating. CREDIT OPINION 12 April Summary.

WILTON (TOWN OF) CT. Update to credit analysis. Credit strengths. » Affluent residential tax base. Credit challenges

Dallas County Community College District, TX

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Dell's CFR to Ba2; outlook stable

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Newport News (City of) VA

Township of Nutley, NJ

Evanston (City of), IL

MOODY'S AFFIRMS Aa3 RATING ON THE CITY OF LIVONIA'S (MI) OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT

Rio Rancho, NM. Credit Strengths. Sizeable and stable tax base. Healthy reserves. Manageable debt burden with rapid payout.

New Rochelle City School District, NY

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Swedbank and Swedbank Mortgage to A1; P-1 ratings affirmed Global Credit Research - 04 Jun 2013

Global Credit Research - 06 Mar 2018

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

Allen Independent School District, TX

Prince William County, VA

Oakland (City of), CA

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Suriname's issuer rating to B2 negative; concluding rating review Global Credit Research - 20 Feb 2018

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Banco Popular to Ba3 from Ba1, negative outlook assigned Global Credit Research - 04 Jul 2013

Findlay City School District, OH

St. Mary's County, MD

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades ratings of 15 European covered bonds following methodology update

Volusia County School District (FL)

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Peruvian banks

Findlay City School District, OH

New Issue: Moody's assigns A3 to Xavier University, OH's $47.5M Ser. 2015C; outlook stable

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Masconomet Regional School District, MA

Taos Municipal School District 1, NM

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades AES Chivor's ratings to Baa3 from Ba1; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 30 May 2014

Rating Action: Moody's assigns (P)Baa1 rating to Brussels Airport Holding SA/NV's senior secured debt; stable outlook

Announcement: Moody's confirms Aaa ratings assigned to Erste Group Bank mortgage and public-sector covered bonds

Las Cruces School District 2, NM

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Edison (Township of) NJ

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades PGW (PA) to A3 from Baa1; Assigns A3 to $278.2 mil Gas Works Rev. Refunding Bds., 15th Series

Rating Update: Moody's downgrades Puerto Rico general obligation and related bonds to Baa3 from Baa1 and certain notched bonds to Ba1

Prince William County, VA

Transcription:

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Oak Creek, WI's $10M General Obligation Promissory Notes Global Credit Research - 11 Dec 2013 The city has $68M of GOULT debt post-sale OAK CREEK (CITY OF) WI Cities (including Towns, Villages and Townships) WI Moody's Rating ISSUE RATING General Obligation Promissory Notes Aa2 Sale Amount $10,000,000 Expected Sale Date 12/17/13 Rating Description General Obligation Moody's Outlook NOO Opinion NEW YORK, December 11, 2013 --Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aa2 rating to the City of Oak Creek's (WI) $10 million General Obligation Promissory Notes. Concurrently, Moody's maintains the Aa2 on the city's outstanding long-term general obligation unlimited tax (GOULT) debt. Post-sale, the city will have $33.9 million of outstanding GOULT long-term debt. The city also has $34.1 million of outstanding GOULT short-term debt maturing within two to three years which the city plans to refinance into long-term debt. The current issuance is structured with level debt service until a $5.9 million bullet principal payment at final maturity in 2023, which the city plans to refinance into ten year notes. Debt service on the notes is secured by the city's GOULT pledge which benefits from a dedicated levy unlimited as to rate or amount. While the notes benefit from an unlimited levy, the city plans to pay for debt service using utility aid revenue. Proceeds from the notes will finance lakefront improvements, including bluff stabilization, road improvements and extensions, public restrooms and other facilities. SUMMARY RATINGS RATIONALE The Aa2 rating reflects the city's sizeable $2.9 billion tax base and advantageous location adjacent to the City of Milwaukee (Aa2 stable); strong financial position with healthy General Fund reserves; above average net direct debt with near term borrowing planned and a significant amount of short-term debt; and average pension liabilities. STRENGTHS - Sizable tax base favorably located in the Milwaukee metropolitan area - Healthy General Fund reserves CHALLENGES - Recent tax base declines - Limited revenue raising flexibility due to state imposed property tax levy limits - Elevated net direct debt burden with future borrowing planned for the near term - Large amount of short-term debt subject to refinancing risk

DETAILED CREDIT DISCUSSION SIZABLE SUBURBAN TAX BASE FAVORABLY LOCATED NEAR MILWAUKEE; SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS TO BE JOINTLY FINANCED BY CITY AND WE ENERGIES We expect the city's tax base to remain stable in the medium term due to its favorable location and available land for development. The City of Oak Creek is located in Milwaukee County (Aa2 stable) and is adjacent to the City of Milwaukee. The city's $2.9 billion tax base has experienced an average annual decline of 3.1% per year since 2007, primarily driven by depreciation of both commercial and residential property values, but the city expects valuations to stabilize going forward. The city has seen strong population growth in the last decade with population increasing from 28,456 in 2000 to 34,451 in 2010, an increase of 21.1%. The largest employers in the city include United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS) (senior unsecured Aa3 stable, 1,121 employees), Oak Creek-Franklin Joint School District (Aa2, 660 employees) and Wisconsin Electric Power Company (senior unsecured A2, ratings under review for possible upgrade, 543 employees). Management reports that the major employers and taxpayers within the city remain stable. Many city residents also commute to neighboring communities and the City of Milwaukee for employment. The unemployment rate for the City of Oak Creek is 5.7%, lower than the state (6.2%) and national (7.3%) rates as of August 2013. Wealth indices for the city are strong with per capita income and median family income of 110.9% and 126.9% of the nation, respectively, according to the 2006-2010 American Community Survey estimates. Wisconsin Electric Power Company, which does business as We Energies, recently added two coal-based steam turbines, increasing the company's state utility tax payment which is then distributed to municipalities in the form of energy aid. Since the tax is based on the utility's capacity, the expansion resulted in an increase in the city's utility aid revenue by $3.3 million to $5.5 million annually in fiscal 2012. Management intends to utilize this increase in utility aid for capital improvements and economic development, including debt service on the current issuance. While the utility aid formula may change, it is unlikely that the aid will be eliminated completely, and this payment will be made as long as the plant is operating. We believe the enterprise risk associated with the utility to be minimal considering the company's long standing history of operating coal and natural gas power plants in the city since the 1940s. Wispark, the development arm of We Energies, has also pledged to spend $20 million in the City of Oak Creek by the year 2016, though the timeframe may be extended. As part of this commitment, the city has been working with Wispark to develop several areas of the city. Drexel Town Square is one of the major joint projects, which will develop TID No. 11, a vacant 85 acre plot in the center of the city. The development will include a grocery store, hotel, restaurants, mixed-use, and residential as well as the city hall, library, and town square. The city, through a previous financing, will provide the water, sewer and other infrastructure for the site. In the spring of 2014, the city also intends to issue additional debt for the library and city hall. The development is expected to add over $160 million to TID No. 11's incremental value within five years. The city and Wispark have also been working together to develop TID No. 8, a 228 acre site located off of State Route 38, which includes the Oak View Business Park. Wispark purchased the land for the site and has pledged $2.4 million in cash backing if TID revenues are not generated as expected. The development within TID No. 8 is expected to bring 1,500 new jobs to the city. SOUND FINANCIAL OPERATIONS EXPECTED TO CONTINUE; SEVERAL YEARS OF OPERATING SURPLUSES DUE TO POSITIVE VARIANCES IN BUDGET The city's financial operations are expected to remain sound as the city has historically posted positive budget variances due to conservative management practices. These practices generated balanced operations in fiscal 2011 and operating surpluses in each of the three prior fiscal years. In fiscal 2012, the city drew down General Fund reserves by $720, 000, as planned, for a one-time payment to employees for accrued sick-time, eliminating the city's accrued liability. Fiscal 2012 closed with a General Fund balance of $7.5 million, or a healthy 33.4% of General Fund revenues, which is also well above the city's policy of maintaining between 10% and 20% of General Fund expenditures in reserve. In fiscal 2013, management budgeted for another draw on General Fund reserves of approximately $200,000. The city also provided $900,000 from its General Fund, which was not included in its original budget, for the purchase of land for development with Wispark. The $900,000 is expected to be repaid to the city at 6% interest through land sales over the course of fiscal 2013 and 2014. Favorably, officials report that positive budget variances have absorbed both the planned draw down and the $900,000 land purchase, and the General Fund is expected to close fiscal 2013 with no change in fund balance. Additionally, officials anticipate that some land sales may be completed by the end of fiscal 2013. If the land sales are finalized prior to the end of the year, management projects the General Fund balance to grow by $700,000. For fiscal 2014, the city approved a balanced budget and

anticipates no change in General Fund reserves. Over 60% of the City of Oak Creek's revenue comes from local property taxes, while 21% comes from state aid, and 7% comes from interfund transfers. Like all cities, villages, towns and counties throughout the state, the city is subject to strict levy limits that limit growth in the operating levy to net new construction. The city is currently levying the maximum allowable amount. At the end of fiscal 2012, the city reported a balance of $5.9 million in its Capital Improvement Fund and nearly $1.0 million in its We Energy Special Revenue Fund (to be used for capital projects), which provides a degree of financial flexibility. The city also operates Water and Sewer utilities, both of which are self-supporting. The water utility reported $6.3 million in cash and investments at the end of fiscal 2012. The water utility provides a Payment In Lieu Of Taxes (PILOT) ranging from $1.2 million to $1.5 million annually, which is transferred into the city's General Fund. The sewer utility reported $8.0 million in cash and investments at the end of fiscal 2012, and does not require any transfers in nor does it provide transfers to other funds. ABOVE AVERAGE DIRECT DEBT BURDEN WITH SIZABLE FUTURE BORROWING PLANNED; SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SHORT TERM DEBT We believe that the city's debt burden will remain manageable despite future borrowing plans due to non-levy support for debt service and planned refinancing of short-term debt and balloon maturities. Currently, Oak Creek's direct debt burden is above average at 2.4% of full value, net of self-supporting essential enterprise revenue debt. The city plans to issue up to $34.5 million in GOULT debt over the next year. With the new debt issuances, the city's debt burden is projected to be approximately 3.5% of full value, higher than the median direct debt levels for similarly rated cities in the state and nation. Despite the elevated direct debt burden, our estimates indicate that debt service as a percentage of operating expenditures will remain manageable, increasing from 7.9% of operating expenditures in fiscal 2012 (adjusted for a $4.5 million refunding) to 15-20% of expenditures after all debt is issued, depending upon the debt service schedule of the future issuances. Notably, the city expects to support debt service for the current and future issuance with utility aid and TID revenues which reduces the burden on the general tax base. If utility aid were reduced, management would pay for debt service first with TID revenues and developer guarantees, and if TID revenues were not sufficient, then management would utilize its debt service levy. Given the increase in the city's debt burden, future credit reviews will focus on its ability to meet debt service without straining other city operations. If utility aid, TID revenues, or other back-up revenues are impaired, the city's credit quality may weaken. The city also has a significant portion of its $68 million in outstanding GOULT debt that is short-term. Over $38 million in GOULT debt is due within three years in large bullet maturities. The city plans to refinance all of the existing short-term debt into long-term debt prior to maturity. The current issuance matures in ten years with $5.9 million principal payment in 2023. The city plans to refinance the debt into ten year notes some time after the call date in December 2021. These large principal payments expose the city to a degree of refinancing risk. Favorably, the city has demonstrated a history of market access as evidenced through annual borrowing through negotiated sales during the past five years. Oak Creek's current overall debt burden of 7.0% of full value is higher than state and national medians, but the majority of the debt is attributable to overlapping entities, including Milwaukee County and the Oak Creek-Franklin School District. The city also has $21.7 million in outstanding revenue debt that is secured by net revenues of the water utility which has maintained a debt service coverage ratio above 2 for the past five years. Principal amortization is rapid with 90.9% of principal retired in ten years; however, this includes several short-term issuances and balloon payments which are expected to be refinanced into long term debt. All of the city's debt is fixed rate, and there is no exposure to derivative or swap agreements. AVERAGE EMPLOYEE PENSION BURDEN INCLUSIVE OF WATER AND SEWER UTILITY CONTRIBUTIONS The City of Oak Creek has an average employee pension burden, based on its participation in the Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS), a multi-employer cost-sharing plan administered by the state. Oak Creek's portion of WRS was reported to be 100% funded as of December 31, 2011. The city has consistently made its required contributions to the pension plan which was a total of $1.5 million in 2011, or 3.9% of operating revenues. Operating revenues include the funds from which this contribution is paid, including the General Fund, Water Utility Fund and the Sewer Utility Fund. Moody's adjusted net pension liability (ANPL) for the city, under our methodology for adjusting reported pension data, is $45.5 million, or 1.74 times operating revenues, compared to a median of just below 1.0 times for rated local governments. Including revenues of the Water Utility Fund and the Sewer Utility Fund, both of which contribute to this liability, the ratio falls to 1.19 times. Moody's ANPL reflects certain adjustments we make to

improve comparability of reported pension liabilities. The adjustments are not intended to replace Oak Creek's reported liability information, but to improve comparability with other rated entities. We determined the city's share of liability in proportion to its contributions to the plan. WHAT COULD CHANGE RATING UP - Significant expansion and diversification of tax base - Marked increases in resident wealth levels WHAT COULD CHANGE RATING DOWN - Continued declines in full value - Erosion of general fund liquidity and reserves - Substantial increase in net direct debt burden -Inability to refinance short-term debt or impairment of revenues to be used for debt service KEY STATISTICS Population (2010 Census): 34,451 (21.1% increase since 2000) 2012 Full valuation: $2.9 billion (3.1% five-year average annual decrease) Estimated full value per capita: $83,705 2006-2010 American Community Survey median family income as a % of nation: 126.9% 2006-2010 American Community Survey per capita income as a % of nation: 110.9% Unemployment rate (July 2013): 5.7% (Wisconsin: 6.2%; US: 7.3%) Fiscal 2012 General Fund balance: $7.5 million (33.4% of revenues) Fiscal 2012 Unassigned General Fund balance: $4.2 million (18.5% of revenues) Overall debt burden as a % of full value (direct): 7.0% (2.4%) Payout of principal (10 years): 90.9% Post-sale general obligation debt outstanding: $68 million (including short-term notes) Water revenue debt outstanding: $21.7 million Moody's ANPL (2011): $45.5M (1.74x fiscal 2011 operating revenues) Moody's ANPL (2011): $45.5M (1.19x fiscal 2011 combined operating and water/sewer revenues) PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY The principal methodology used in this rating was General Obligation Bonds Issued by US Local Governments published in April 2013. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. REGULATORY DISCLOSURES For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where

the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com. Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review. Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating. Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating. Analysts Cora Bruemmer Lead Analyst Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service Hetty Chang Additional Contact Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service Contacts Journalists: (212) 553-0376 Research Clients: (212) 553-1653 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 USA 2013 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE

RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable, including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy." For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you

represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for retail clients to make any investment decision based on MOODY'S credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.