Appendix - Normally Distributed Admissible Choices are Optimal

Similar documents
Appendix for Solving Asset Pricing Models when the Price-Dividend Function is Analytic

Elton, Gruber, Brown, and Goetzmann. Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis, 7th Edition. Solutions to Text Problems: Chapter 9

Problem Set 6 Finance 1,

Risk and Return: The Security Markets Line

Elements of Economic Analysis II Lecture VI: Industry Supply

Elton, Gruber, Brown and Goetzmann. Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis, 7th Edition. Solutions to Text Problems: Chapter 4

Applications of Myerson s Lemma

Principles of Finance

MgtOp 215 Chapter 13 Dr. Ahn

OPERATIONS RESEARCH. Game Theory

Lecture 7. We now use Brouwer s fixed point theorem to prove Nash s theorem.

ECE 586GT: Problem Set 2: Problems and Solutions Uniqueness of Nash equilibria, zero sum games, evolutionary dynamics

Introduction to game theory

Jeffrey Ely. October 7, This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License.

Chapter 5 Student Lecture Notes 5-1

Mutual Funds and Management Styles. Active Portfolio Management

Linear Combinations of Random Variables and Sampling (100 points)

COS 511: Theoretical Machine Learning. Lecturer: Rob Schapire Lecture #21 Scribe: Lawrence Diao April 23, 2013

Economics 1410 Fall Section 7 Notes 1. Define the tax in a flexible way using T (z), where z is the income reported by the agent.

- contrast so-called first-best outcome of Lindahl equilibrium with case of private provision through voluntary contributions of households

A Comparison of Risk Return Relationship in the Portfolio Selection Models

Equilibrium in Prediction Markets with Buyers and Sellers

Introduction. Chapter 7 - An Introduction to Portfolio Management

Price and Quantity Competition Revisited. Abstract

Multifactor Term Structure Models

3: Central Limit Theorem, Systematic Errors

TCOM501 Networking: Theory & Fundamentals Final Examination Professor Yannis A. Korilis April 26, 2002

Tests for Two Correlations

15-451/651: Design & Analysis of Algorithms January 22, 2019 Lecture #3: Amortized Analysis last changed: January 18, 2019

II. Random Variables. Variable Types. Variables Map Outcomes to Numbers

UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM

Supplementary material for Non-conjugate Variational Message Passing for Multinomial and Binary Regression

Evaluating Performance

To Rebalance or Not to Rebalance? Edward Qian, PhD, CFA PanAgora Asset Management

Option pricing and numéraires

Chapter 3 Descriptive Statistics: Numerical Measures Part B

Consumption Based Asset Pricing

Wages as Anti-Corruption Strategy: A Note

Introduction to PGMs: Discrete Variables. Sargur Srihari

Midterm Exam. Use the end of month price data for the S&P 500 index in the table below to answer the following questions.

Chapter 3 Student Lecture Notes 3-1

3/3/2014. CDS M Phil Econometrics. Vijayamohanan Pillai N. Truncated standard normal distribution for a = 0.5, 0, and 0.5. CDS Mphil Econometrics

Analysis of Variance and Design of Experiments-II

Correlations and Copulas

c slope = -(1+i)/(1+π 2 ) MRS (between consumption in consecutive time periods) price ratio (across consecutive time periods)

THE MARKET PORTFOLIO MAY BE MEAN-VARIANCE EFFICIENT AFTER ALL

Random Variables. b 2.

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS. EXAM FM SAMPLE SOLUTIONS Interest Theory

Economic Design of Short-Run CSP-1 Plan Under Linear Inspection Cost

arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 29 Oct 2015

Foundations of Machine Learning II TP1: Entropy

Utilitarianism. Jeffrey Ely. June 7, This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License.

Prospect Theory and Asset Prices

Digital assets are investments with

Taxation and Externalities. - Much recent discussion of policy towards externalities, e.g., global warming debate/kyoto

Harry M. Markowitz. Investors Do Not Get Paid for Bearing Risk 1

Mode is the value which occurs most frequency. The mode may not exist, and even if it does, it may not be unique.

Online Appendix for Merger Review for Markets with Buyer Power

Notes on Debye-Hückel Theory

25.1. Arbitrage Pricing Theory Introduction

2) In the medium-run/long-run, a decrease in the budget deficit will produce:

references Chapters on game theory in Mas-Colell, Whinston and Green

Benefit-Cost Analysis

4. Greek Letters, Value-at-Risk

2.1 Rademacher Calculus... 3

ECONOMETRICS - FINAL EXAM, 3rd YEAR (GECO & GADE)

A Set of new Stochastic Trend Models

Maturity Effect on Risk Measure in a Ratings-Based Default-Mode Model

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.other] 28 Nov 2004

Portfolio Risk Management Using the Lorenz Curve

3 Portfolio Management

Fall 2016 Social Sciences 7418 University of Wisconsin-Madison. Transactions and Portfolio Crowding Out

Chapter 11: Optimal Portfolio Choice and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

CS 286r: Matching and Market Design Lecture 2 Combinatorial Markets, Walrasian Equilibrium, Tâtonnement

1 A Primer on Linear Models. 2 Chapter 1 corrections. 3 Chapter 2 corrections. 4 Chapter 3 corrections. 1.1 Corrections 23 May 2015

>1 indicates country i has a comparative advantage in production of j; the greater the index, the stronger the advantage. RCA 1 ij

Teaching Note on Factor Model with a View --- A tutorial. This version: May 15, Prepared by Zhi Da *

Financial Risk Management in Portfolio Optimization with Lower Partial Moment

Topic 6 Introduction to Portfolio Theory

Lecture Note 1: Foundations 1

Efficient Project Portfolio as a Tool for Enterprise Risk Management

Terrorism and the Optimal Defense of Networks of Targets Dan Kovenock Brian Roberson

Spatial Variations in Covariates on Marriage and Marital Fertility: Geographically Weighted Regression Analyses in Japan

Problems to be discussed at the 5 th seminar Suggested solutions

THIRTY YEARS AGO marked the publication of what has come to be

Final Exam. 7. (10 points) Please state whether each of the following statements is true or false. No explanation needed.

EDC Introduction

332 Mathematical Induction Solutions for Chapter 14. for every positive integer n. Proof. We will prove this with mathematical induction.

Теоретические основы и методология имитационного и комплексного моделирования

** Professor of Finance, College of Business Administration, University of Houston, Houston, TX Tel. (713)

Two Period Models. 1. Static Models. Econ602. Spring Lutz Hendricks

Crises and Rating Agencies

Games and Decisions. Part I: Basic Theorems. Contents. 1 Introduction. Jane Yuxin Wang. 1 Introduction 1. 2 Two-player Games 2

The Value of Negotiating Cost-Based Transfer Prices

Volume 30, Issue 1. Partial privatization in price-setting mixed duopoly. Kazuhiro Ohnishi Institute for Basic Economic Science, Japan

Static (or Simultaneous- Move) Games of Complete Information

/ Computational Genomics. Normalization

EPPE6024: Macroeconomics Lecture 2: Aggregate Demand (AD), Aggregate Supply (AS), and Business Cycle

The economics of climate change

Global Optimization in Multi-Agent Models

Transcription:

Appendx - Normally Dstrbuted Admssble Choces are Optmal James N. Bodurtha, Jr. McDonough School of Busness Georgetown Unversty and Q Shen Stafford Partners Aprl 994 latest revson September 00 Abstract Partcular utlty functons that are optmzers for a partcular admssble set element are dentfed. The optmalty of the normally dstrbuted admssble portfolos s shown n the second-order stochastc domnance ntegral context. Please address correspondence to the frst author at School of Busness, Georgetown Unversty, Old North 33, 37 th & O Streets, NW, Washngton, DC 0057, (0) 687-635, fax: (0) 687-403, and e-mal: bodurthj@gunet.georgetown.edu

For Normal Returns, Mean-Varance Admssble Choces are Optmal Abstract Partcular utlty functons that are optmzers for a partcular admssble set element are dentfed. The optmalty of the normally dstrbuted admssble portfolos s shown n the second-order stochastc domnance ntegral context. A-. Optmal Choces among Mutually Exclusve Alternatves We use a geometrc argument to llustrate constructon of the utlty functons that wll choose each element of the SSD admssble set. Proposton A-: For every member of the SSD admssble set of choces, there exsts a utlty functon n U that s the optmzer for that utlty functon. Φ, we can order the Proof: Gven an admssble set of normal dstrbutons = { F,F,,F } dstrbutons n the admssble set Φ n such a way that n < < < n, and µ < µ < < µ n. Furthermore, these strct relatons order the SD admssble set over the real lne. Consder any three adjacent dstrbutons, F, F, and F +, for nteger ndex, < <n. Construct two dstrbutons satsfyng the followng: ε = = ε ε N µ = µ + ε = + F ε ~ N µ ε µ, ε F + ε ~ + ε, + ε and (A-) We can always construct a smooth convex curve (maybe of second-degree) whch passes below the mean-varance pars assocated wth dstrbutons F ε, F, and F +ε, and above the mean-varance pars assocated wth dstrbutons F and F +. We use ths curve as the upper-most equ-utlty curve for some utlty functon. (Other equ-utlty curves n the same famly should be below ths curve.) Snce all dstrbutons other than F are below or on the rght sde of ths curve, F s the optmzer of ths utlty functon. Q.E.D. See Barron (977) for a thorough treatment of mean-varance utlty functons. --

For the mutually exclusve nvestment choce problem, we conclude that the SSD admssble set s the optmal set. Alternatve Proof of Proposton Φ, f Φ s a Proposton : Gven a set of normal dstrbutons = { F,F,,F,F } n n+ U admssble set, then t s also the CSSD admssble set and optmal. Proof: Φ s an admssble set; therefore, dstrbutons are mutually undomnated. Snce n the normal dstrbuton case, SSD s equvalent to the mean-varance decson rule, we can order the dstrbutons n Φ n such a way that < < < n, and µ < µ < < µ n. The mean and standard devaton of dstrbuton F n + may be anywhere n the sequence of F, F,. F n Case : max { j} µ = µ < µ + A dstrbuton may only be domnated by an alternatve wth n n j n hgher mean. Therefore, the dstrbuton wth the hghest mean cannot be domnated by a mxture of dstrbuton wth lower means. Case : µ n+ µ n max { µ j} < =. We dvde the set Φ n two parts: = { F,,F } j n { F,,F } Φ = k+ n, such that µ k< µ n+ < µ k+ and < < requre the followng: n r k r r ( ) ( ) ( ) j j j j n j= k+ j = k n+ k+ Φ, and k. For CSSD, we λ F t dt+ λ F t dt F + t dt, r, and< some r (A-) In the context of prevous Generalzed Locaton-Scale dstrbuton famly-related footnotes, mean-scale admssble t dstrbutons wth the same degree of freedom, stable dstrbutons wth the same characterstc exponent and skewness and log-normal dstrbutons are optmal. --

Dvdng through by the rght-hand sde of equaton (A-), r r k F n j( t ) dt Fj( t) dt λ j r + λ j r, r, and< some r j = F ( ) j k n t dt = + + Fn+ ( t) (A-3) dt Consder the frst term on the left hand sde of equaton A-3) whch s the weghted sum of SSD ntegrals over dstrbutons to k. By the dstrbuton domnance Lemma, all terms n ths sum go to zero as r goes to mnus nfnty. Analogously, consder the second term on the left hand sde of equaton A-3) whch s the weghted sum of SSD ntegrals over dstrbutons k+ to n. By the dstrbuton domnance Lemma, all terms n ths sum go to nfnty as r goes to mnus nfnty. Furthermore, at least one of the convex combnaton weghts assocated wth dstrbutons k+ to n must be greater than zero. Otherwse, the expected value of the domnatng mxture wll not exceed the expected value of the domnance canddate dstrbuton, whch s a necessary domnance condton. Therefore, the value of the left hand sde s far greater than one for suffcently small r, and approaches nfnty as r goes to mnus nfnty. Admssble normally dstrbuted choce n+ cannot be domnated under CSSD. Q.E.D. A-. Optmal Portfolo Choces In an n-securty portfolo problem, returns are represented by a random n-vector x, and a choce s a vector of portfolo nvestment weghts. We assume that the set of all feasble portfolo choces, P, s a closed bounded set: T n = { n } P = π= π, π,, π, : π =, max π < M, -3-

Investors have utlty functons n the U class, and the return vector follows a jont normal dstrbuton. In ths case, SSD domnance s equvalent to a mean-varance orderng. As s well known, the effcent set s the upper half of the mean-varance fronter. Snce nothng can domnate the unque portfolo that maxmzes the expected value of a U functon, the SSD admssble set s effcent. Furthermore, we can show that the SSD admssble set (the upper half of the mean-varance fronter) s optmal. Followng Huang and Ltzenberger (988), pp. 64-67: 3 = ( ), V s the varance-covarance matrx of x, (,,, ) e E x A T V e, B e T V e, C T V, D BC A > 0 (A-) T The equaton for the mean-varance effcent fronter s the followng: C A ( µ ) C D C C A Therefore, = + µ C D C A T =, < µ < µ M, µ π e, and π T V π C (A-3) Proposton A-: For every member of the SSD admssble portfolo choce set, there exsts a utlty functon n U that s the optmzer for that utlty functon. Proof: To show that a gven member of the SSD admssble set s optmal, we construct the assocated U -class utlty functon. In a one-parameter utlty famly { e ax a> } a gven pont on the effcent fronter ( µ, ), we set : 0 and for 3 See Merton (97) and Roll (976) for full treatments of ths effcent portfolo set. Our effcent set s the open nterval above the mnmum varance portfolo and below some arbtrary upper bound. The upper bound s necessary to have a well-posed optmzaton problem. -4-

a = D > 0. Cµ A E e ax a = µ The assocated expected utlty s [ ] Substtutng (3) nto (4), [ ] E e ax = a C A µ C + µ D C (A-4) Ths expected utlty functon wll be maxmzed at µ max = D + A = µ. Q.E.D. ac C For the portfolo choce problem, we conclude that the mean-varance effcent fronter s both the SSD admssble set and optmal. A-3 CSSD Portfolo Choces For portfolo choces, Baron (977) has shown that a choce vector, π, domnates the assocated mxed strategy, λ π, for all strctly concave von Neumann-Morgenstern utlty functons. Ytzhak-Mayshar (997) have proven ths result n the context of Margnal Stochastc Domnance for general dstrbutons. We present a corollary to these results as Proposton A-3. We frst develop two addtonal lemmas: Lemma A-: The SSD ntegral () s convex. Proof: The SSD ntegral s a twce contnuously dfferentable real-valued functon on an open nterval. Furthermore, ts second dervatve s the normal densty and hence, non-negatve throughout ts doman. From Rockafellar (970), convexty follows by Theorem 4.4, and essentally strct convexty follows by Theorem 6.3 (the SSD ntegral gradent s the normal dstrbuton and s postve over the real lne.) Lemma A-: A portfolo of normally dstrbuted choces SSD domnates the assocated mxture of normally dstrbuted choces. -5-

Proof: Gven Lemma A- [convexty of the SSD ntegral ()], a convex combnaton (mxture) of these ntegrals s no less than the SSD ntegral defned over the lnear combnaton (portfolo) of the assocated random varables. Wth ntegraton by parts, we have the followng: x x µ x µ x ( ) µ F t dt = Φ +φ φ x µ, and x µ Φ are the standard normal dstrbuton and densty, respectvely. For a portfolo to CSSD domnate a mxture requres ( ) ( ) and (A-5) x µ p x µ p x µ p x µ x µ x µ p Φ p +φ p α Φ +φ p x µ x µ x µ + ( α ) Φ ( ) +φ ( ) x, and 0 <α<., ( ) Defnng the portfolo weghts to equal the mxture weghts, we have ( ) ( ) p (A-6) x =α x + α x (A-7) µ =αµ + αµ p ( ) ( ) ( ) =α + α αρ+ α α + α p However, settng the correlaton equal to one mples that the portfolo standard devaton s a convex combnaton of the other two standard devatons, and that ths standard devaton s an upper bound on the actual portfolo standard devaton: ( ) =α + α (A-8) Therefore, p p ρ= x µ p x µ p x µ p x µ p x µ p x µ p p Φ +φ p ρ= Φ p p p pρ= +φ pρ= pρ= x µ x µ x µ x µ x µ x µ α Φ ( ) +φ ( ) + ( α ) Φ ( ) +φ ( ), x (, ) and 0<α<. (A-9) -6-

The frst panel of Fgure depcts two SSD ntegrals. The second panel of ths fgure plots an example for the equally-weghted mxture and portfolo of the two normally dstrbuted choces. Our CSSD effcent portfolo proposton follows: Proposton A-3: The mean-varance effcent fronter choces are CSSD admssble. Proof: Gven Lemma A-, any mxture of alternatves s domnated by an assocated portfolo. Any portfolo not assocated wth the mean-varance effcent fronter s domnated by some element of the set of portfolos on the effcent fronter. Therefore, mean-varance effcent portfolo choces domnate mxtures of portfolo dstrbutons, and all such portfolos are CSSD admssble. Lke mutually exclusve choce CSSD Proposton, Proposton A-3 shows that the entre mean-varance effcent portfolo fronter s optmal. 4 4 Analogous results wll hold for t dstrbutons wth the same degree of freedom, Cauchy dstrbutons, and stable dstrbutons wth the same characterstc exponent and skewness parameter. Snce portfolos of log-normal returns are not log-normal, the mutually exclusve choce result for ths dstrbuton does not extend smlarly. -7-

Fgure Normal Dstrbuton-Based Second-Order Stochastc Domnance Integrals 5 Panel A: Two Alternatve Choce Elements 0.45 0.40 0.35 S 0.30 S 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.05 0.00-0.4-0.3-0. -0. 0 0. 0. 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.40 Panel B: Mxture and Portfolo of the Alternatves 0.35 0.30 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.05 0.00-0.3-0. -0. 0 0. 0. 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Mxture Portfolo x x µ x µ = µ Φ +φ. 5 Wth ntegraton by parts, F ( t) dt ( x ) φ x µ are the standard normal dstrbuton and densty, respectvely. Φ x µ and -8-

Addtonal References Barron, Davd P, "On the Utlty Theoretc Foundatons of Mean-Varance Analyss," Journal of Fnance, 3(5). December 977, 683-697. Huang, Ch-fu and Robert H. Ltzenberger, Foundatons of Fnancal Economcs, New York, North-Holland, 988. Merton, Robert, "An Analytc Dervaton of the Effcent Portfolo Fronter," Journal of Fnancal and Quanttatve Analyss, 7(4), September 97, 85-87. Rockafellar, R. Tyrell, Convex Analyss, Prnceton, NJ, Prnceton Unversty Press, 970. Roll, Rchard, A Crtque of the Asset Prcng Theory's Tests: Part I: On Past and Potental Testablty of the Theory, Journal-of-Fnancal-Economcs; 4(), March 977, pages 9-76. -9-