ECE6604 PERSONAL & MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS. Lecture 3. Interference and Shadow Margins, Handoff Gain, Coverage

Similar documents
EELE 6333: Wireless Commuications

EE6604 Personal & Mobile Communications. Week 7. Path Loss Models. Shadowing

EE6604 Personal & Mobile Communications. Week 9. Co-Channel Interference

ECE 5325/6325: Wireless Communication Systems Lecture Notes, Fall Link Budgeting. Lecture 7. Today: (1) Link Budgeting

Pathloss and Link Budget From Physical Propagation to Multi-Path Fading Statistical Characterization of Channels. P r = P t Gr G t L P

EE 577: Wireless and Personal Communications

EELE 5414 Wireless Communications. Chapter 4: Mobile Radio Propagation: Large-Scale Path Loss

EENG473 Mobile Communications Module 3 : Week # (11) Mobile Radio Propagation: Large-Scale Path Loss

Unit 1: The wireless channel

Wireless Communications

Indoor Propagation Models

Optimization of Base Station Location in 3G Networks using Mads and Fuzzy C-means

Edinburgh Research Explorer

37th Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Sept. 2009

Table of Contents. Kocaeli University Computer Engineering Department 2011 Spring Mustafa KIYAR Optimization Theory

Dokumentnamn. Document - Ref PTS-ER-2004:32

Path Loss Models and Link Budget

ECE 5325/6325: Wireless Communication Systems Lecture Notes, Spring 2013

PROBABILITY CONTENT OF ERROR ELLIPSE AND ERROR CONTOUR (navell-08.mcd)

Optimizing the Existing Indoor Propagation Prediction Models

PROPAGATION PATH LOSS IN URBAN AND SUBURBAN AREA

Suburban Area Path loss Propagation Prediction and Optimisation Using Hata Model at 2375MHz

White Paper: Comparison of Narrowband and Ultra Wideband Channels. January 2008

Proposed Propagation Model for Dehradun Region

Empirical Characterization of Propagation Path Loss and Performance Evaluation for Co-Site Urban Environment

Measurement of Radio Propagation Path Loss over the Sea for Wireless Multimedia

Probability distributions relevant to radiowave propagation modelling

Statistics 511 Supplemental Materials

IJESRT. Scientific Journal Impact Factor: (ISRA), Impact Factor: 2.114

Link Budget Calculation. Ermanno Pietrosemoli Marco Zennaro

COMPARISON OF RADIO PROPAGATION CHARACTERISTICS AT 700 AND 2,500 MHz PERTAINING TO MACROCELLULAR COVERAGE

A Model of Coverage Probability under Shadow Fading

FIN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS SPRING 2008

Eco504 Spring 2010 C. Sims MID-TERM EXAM. (1) (45 minutes) Consider a model in which a representative agent has the objective. B t 1.

Final exam solutions

EE Large Scale Path Loss Log Normal Shadowing. The Flat Fading Channel

[Ekeocha*, 5(5): May, 2016] ISSN: Impact Factor: 3.785

SYSM 6304 Risk and Decision Analysis Lecture 2: Fitting Distributions to Data

Coverage Planning for LTE system Case Study

ECON 6022B Problem Set 2 Suggested Solutions Fall 2011

Indoor Measurement And Propagation Prediction Of WLAN At

Pakes (1986): Patents as Options: Some Estimates of the Value of Holding European Patent Stocks

STOR Lecture 15. Jointly distributed Random Variables - III

The Impact of Fading on the Outage Probability in Cognitive Radio Networks

CS 237: Probability in Computing

Path Loss Modeling Based on Field Measurements Using Deployed 3.5 GHz WiMAX Network

Stochastic Differential Equations in Finance and Monte Carlo Simulations

Monte Carlo Methods for Uncertainty Quantification

Lecture 7: Computation of Greeks

Lecture Slides. Elementary Statistics Tenth Edition. by Mario F. Triola. and the Triola Statistics Series. Slide 1

EE641 Digital Image Processing II: Purdue University VISE - October 29,

SELFIS: A Short Tutorial

Data Analysis and Statistical Methods Statistics 651

Modeling Credit Exposure for Collateralized Counterparties

LTE RF Planning Training LTE RF Planning, Design, Optimization Training

Notes on the EM Algorithm Michael Collins, September 24th 2005

PATH LOSS PREDICTION FOR GSM MOBILE NETWORKS FOR URBAN REGION OF ABA, SOUTH-EAST NIGERIA

Econ 250 Fall Due at November 16. Assignment 2: Binomial Distribution, Continuous Random Variables and Sampling

Math 623 (IOE 623), Winter 2008: Final exam

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PATH LOSS PREDICTION MODELS FOR URBAN MACROCELLULAR ENVIRONMENTS

EE266 Homework 5 Solutions

Tests for Two Variances

Lecture Stat 302 Introduction to Probability - Slides 15

Practice Problems 1: Moral Hazard

Exam M Fall 2005 PRELIMINARY ANSWER KEY

CDMA2000 Network Planning. cdma university. Student Guide X3

Hedging with Life and General Insurance Products

Path Loss Prediction in Wireless Communication System using Fuzzy Logic

Valuing volatility and variance swaps for a non-gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck stochastic volatility model

PASS Sample Size Software

EE365: Risk Averse Control

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2012, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam

Chapter 3 Common Families of Distributions. Definition 3.4.1: A family of pmfs or pdfs is called exponential family if it can be expressed as

Confidence Intervals for Paired Means with Tolerance Probability

Seasonal Pathloss Modeling at 900MHz for OMAN

Equity correlations implied by index options: estimation and model uncertainty analysis

Performance Evaluation of Channel Propagation Models and Developed Model for Mobile Communication

Two hours. To be supplied by the Examinations Office: Mathematical Formula Tables and Statistical Tables THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER

ECE 295: Lecture 03 Estimation and Confidence Interval

Lecture Quantitative Finance Spring Term 2015

Bivariate Birnbaum-Saunders Distribution

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO. Please make sure that your copy of the problem set is complete before you attempt to answer anything.

Review of Comparative Analysis of Empirical Propagation model for WiMAX

AN021: RF MODULES RANGE CALCULATIONS AND TEST

Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming

IEOR 3106: Introduction to OR: Stochastic Models. Fall 2013, Professor Whitt. Class Lecture Notes: Tuesday, September 10.

Mathematics of Finance Final Preparation December 19. To be thoroughly prepared for the final exam, you should

Lecture 17: More on Markov Decision Processes. Reinforcement learning

GARCH Models. Instructor: G. William Schwert

2015 American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER)

Asset-based Estimates for Default Probabilities for Commercial Banks

Comparison Between Measured and Predicted Path Loss for Mobile Communication in Malaysia

Tests for One Variance

Continuous Probability Distributions & Normal Distribution

- 1 - **** d(lns) = (µ (1/2)σ 2 )dt + σdw t

FREDRIK BAJERS VEJ 7 G 9220 AALBORG ØST Tlf.: URL: Fax: Monte Carlo methods

Data Analysis and Statistical Methods Statistics 651

Continuous Distributions

A potentially useful approach to model nonlinearities in time series is to assume different behavior (structural break) in different subsamples

Value at Risk and Self Similarity

Transcription:

ECE6604 PERSONAL & MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS Lecture 3 Interference and Shadow Margins, Handoff Gain, Coverage 1

Interference Margin As the subscriber load increases, additional interference is generated from both inside and outside of a cell. With increased interference, the coverage area shrinks and some calls are dropped. As calls are dropped, the interference decreases and the coverage area expands. the expansion/contraction of the coverage area is a phenomenon known as cell breathing. We must introduce an interference degradation margin into the link budget to eliminate cell breathing. To account for the maximum interference degradation, we reduce the maximum allowable path loss by an interference margin, (L I ) db. The appropriate value of (L I ) db depends on the particular cellular system being deployed and the maximum expected load level. 2

Shadowing With shadowing the received signal power is Ω p (dbm) = 10log 10 (k) + Ω t (dbm) 10βlog 10 (d) + ǫ (db) where the parameter ǫ (db) is the error between the predicted and actual path loss. Very often ǫ (db) is modeled as a zero-mean Gaussian or normal random variable with variance σ 2 Ω, where σ Ω in decibels (db) is called the shadow standard deviation. That is, the probability density function of ǫ (db) is p ǫ(db) (x) = 1 2πσΩ e x2 /2σ 2 Ω Typically, σ Ω ranges from 4 to 12 db depending on the local topography; σ Ω = 8 db is a very commonly used value. 3

-50 1.0 10.0 100.0 km -60 free space -20 db/decade -70-80 dbm σ Ω db urban macrocell -40 db/decade = 8 db σ Ω Path loss and shadowing in a typical cellular environment. 4

Outage The quality of a radio link is acceptable only when the received signal power Ω p (dbm) is greater than a threshold value Ω th (dbm). An outage occurs whenever Ω p (dbm) < Ω th (dbm). The edge outage probability, P E, is defined as the probability that Ω p (dbm) < Ω th (dbm) at the cell edge. The area outage probability, P O, is defined as the probability that Ω p (dbm) < Ω th (dbm) when averaged over the entire cell area. To maintain an acceptable outage probability in the presence of shadowing, we must introduce a shadow margin. 5

Area = 0.1 σ = 8 Ω Ω th M shad received carrier power (dbm) Determining the required shadow margin to give P E = 0.1. 6

Choose M shad so that the shaded area under the Gaussian density function is equal to 0.1. Hence, we solve ( ) Mshad 1 0.1 = Q Q(x) = e y2 /2 dy 2π σ Ω x We have M shad σ Ω = Q 1 (0.1) = 1.28 For σ Ω = 8 db we have The area outage probability is where M shad = 1.28 8 = 10.24 db P O = Q(X) exp { XY + Y 2 /2 } Q(X + Y ) X = M shad, Y = 2σ Ωln10 σ Ω 10β From this we can solve for the required shadow margin, M shad. Note that P O < P E for the same value of M shad. 7

Handoff Gain At the boundary area between two cells, we obtain a macrodiversity effect. Although the link to the serving base station may be shadowed such that Ω p (dbm) is below the receiver threshold, the link to another base station may provide a Ω p (dbm) above the receiver threshold. Handoffs take advantage of macrodiversity and reduce the required shadow margin over the single cell case, by an amount equal to the handoff gain, G HO. There are a variety of handoff algorithms used in cellular systems. CDMA system use soft handoffs, while TDMA systems usually use hard handoffs. The maximum allowable path loss with the inclusion of the margins for shadowing and interference loading, and handoff gain is L max (db) = Ω t (dbm) +G T (db) +G R (db) S RX (dbm) M shad (db) L I (db) +G HO (db). 8

100 99 98 97 Coverage (%) 96 95 94 Soft Handoff Hard handoff Single Cell 93 92 91 90 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Shadow Margin (db) Typical handoff gain for hard and soft handoffs. In this plot shadow margin is defined as M shad G HO, where M shad is the shadow margin required for a single cell. We also plot the area averaged outage rather than the edge outage. 9

Cellular Radio Coverage Radio coverage refers to the number of base stations or cell sites that are required to cover or provide service to a given area with an acceptable grade of service. The number of cell sites required to cover a given area is determined by the maximum allowable path loss and the path loss exponent. To compare the coverage of different cellular systems, we first determine the maximum allowable path loss, L max (db), for the different systems by using a common quality criterion. Then L max (db) = C + 10βlog 10 d max where d max is the radio path length that corresponds to the maximum allowable path loss and C is a constant. The quantity d max is equal to the radius of the cell. To provide good coverage it is desirable that d max be as large as possible. 10

Comparing Coverage Suppose that System 1 has L max (db) = L 1 and System 2 has L max (db) = L 2, with corresponding radio path lengths of d 1 and d 2, respectively. The difference in the maximum allowable path loss is related to the cell radii by or looking at things another way L 1 L 2 = 10β (log 10 d 1 log 10 d 2 ) ( ) d 1 = 10β log 10 d 2 d 1 d 2 = 10 (L 1 L 2 )/(10β) Since the area of a cell is equal to A = πd 2 (assuming a circular cell) the ratio of the cell areas is and, hence, A 1 A 2 = d2 1 d 2 2 = ( ) 2 d1 d 2 A 1 A 2 = 10 2(L 1 L 2 )/(10β). 11

Suppose that A tot is the total geographical area to be covered. Then the ratio of the required number of cell sites for Systems 1 and 2 is N 1 N 2 = A tot/a 1 A tot /A 2 = A 2 A 1 = 10 2(L 1 L 2 )/(10β) Example: Suppose that β = 3.5 and L 1 L 2 = 2 db. N 2 /N 1 = 1.30. Conclusion: System 2 requires 30% more base stations to cover the same geographical area. 12