Part C. Impact on sample design

Similar documents
Benchmarking options for the effective achievement of the renewable energy target of the EU energy strategy by 2030

ANNUAL ECONOMIC SURVEY OF EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES IN 2008

EU Budget 2009: billion. implemented. 4. The European Union as a global player; ; 6.95% 5. Administration ; 6.

A new approach to education PPPs in the Eurostat/OECD exercise

On 19/06/2012 the Court delivered its ruling in Case C-307/10 IP Translator, giving the following answers to the referred questions:

ANNUAL ECONOMIC SURVEY OF EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES IN 2008

MM, EFES EN. Marc Mathieu

Reform strategies: the experience of emerging European economies and their effects on sustainability and equity

European Commission. Economic Tendency Surveys in the EU

Business churn, sectoral performance, and economic policy

THE 2016 EU JUSTICE SCOREBOARD

European contract law in business-to-business transactions

European contract law in consumer transactions

QUALITY REPORT: ANNUAL FINANCIAL ACCOUNTS

The challenges of an ageing population. Budgetary and labour force projections for Belgium and the EU Member States

State of play of CAP measure Setting up of Young Farmers in the European Union

Trust, Statistics & Knowledge Evidence from the EC Special Eurobarometer survey 2009

Carving out legacy assets: A successful tool for bank restructuring?

European Semester and monitoring policy for investment in health and well-being

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

RETIREMENT Differences in State of Affairs and legacies across the EU28

HOW RECESSION REFLECTS IN THE LABOUR MARKET INDICATORS

Axis 4 (Leader) Implementing Local Development Strategies

FOCUS AREA 5B: Energy efficiency

October 2010 Euro area unemployment rate at 10.1% EU27 at 9.6%

Macro-financial outlook with a view on NPL s and debt restructuring. Vedran Šošić, Vicegovernor

Investment and Investment Finance open questions?

Working conditions in Europe. Findings from the 5 th European Working Conditions Survey

FOCUS AREA 6C: Access to and quality of ICT

Directorate F: Social Statistics and Information Society Unit F-3: Living conditions and social protection statistics ESSPROS TASK FORCE MEETING

January 2010 Euro area unemployment rate at 9.9% EU27 at 9.5%

Gender equality in the Member States

IMPACT INDICATORS. Research, Innovation, ICT and broadband, SMEs Competitiveness

EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT

Social trends and dynamics of poverty and social exclusion. ESDE conference Brussels 06/02/2013

FOCUS AREA 6B: Fostering local development

Can Active Labour Market Programmes reduce Long-Term Unemployment?

IMPACT OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE ON PUBLIC EXPENDITURE AND REVENUE IN EUROPE

Growth, competitiveness and jobs: priorities for the European Semester 2013 Presentation of J.M. Barroso,

AUTOMATIC STABILIZERS VS. DISCRETIONARY MEASURES: EVIDENCE FROM CROATIA ANA GRDOVIĆ GNIP

COMMISSION DECISION of 23 April 2012 on the second set of common safety targets as regards the rail system (notified under document C(2012) 2084)

GROWTH AND JOBS: NEXT STEPS

AN INITIATIVE TO SUPPORT WORK-LIFE BALANCE FOR WORKING PARENTS AND CARERS

Working Group Social Protection

THE 2015 EU JUSTICE SCOREBOARD

LEADER implementation update Leader/CLLD subgroup meeting Brussels, 21 April 2015

DATA SET ON INVESTMENT FUNDS (IVF) Naming Conventions

Library statistical spotlight

Personal Pensions: Current Regulations and Products. Ambrogio Rinaldi Central Director, COVIP, Italy Vice-Chair, OPC, EIOPA

Discussion paper on General Anti-Abuse Rules (GAAR)

From Crisis to Recovery: The Challenges ahead for the European Economy

Improving the quality of public finance an analytical framework 2018 Ludwig Erhard Lecture

Imputed Rents in EU-SILC. Results from Net-SILC2 work package on imputed rents

INTERGENERATIONAL FAIRNESS ESDE 2017 CONFERENCE 10 OCTOBER 2017 #ESDE2017. Barbara Kauffmann Director of Employment and Social Governance Directorate

EBA REPORT ON HIGH EARNERS

Macroeconomic policies in an open economy

Cohesion Policy support for Sustainable Energy

EUROPE S SOURCES OF GROWTH

Role of governments and social partners in keeping older workers in the labour market (2013)

Poland Social Sector and Public Wages Public Expenditure Review From Maastricht to Vision 2030 Overview

The Mystery of Low Productivity Growth: Some Insights from Belgium

Completing EMU: Arguments and proposals for the next term of office of the European Parliament and the European Commission

A European Energy Dialogue. Exploring the needs and methods of public involvement and engagement in the energy policy field

NOTE ON EU27 CHILD POVERTY RATES

"Overcoming Europe s Policy Trilemmas: Economics, Politics and Governance in a Union Under Stress"

Challenges to financing health: what are the options?

PEEIS QUARTERLY QUALITY REPORT 2 ND QUARTER PEEIs Quality Report December 08. Author: Gianluigi Mazzi

Point 2.4. Feedback from LAMAS on IESS issues

Tools for the Efficient and Sustainable Management of Natural Resources

Two years to go to the 2014 European elections European Parliament Eurobarometer (EB/EP 77.4)

Albane DEMBLANS Secretariat-General of the European Commission

Income inequality: policy response from the EU perspective. 5 October 2017 Aurimas Andrulis, DG EMPL

Social Protection and Social Inclusion in Europe Key facts and figures

FOCUS AREA 2A: Improving economic performance of all farms, farm restructuring and modernisation

European Innovation Policy. an Economic perspective

Neoclassicism in the Balkans

A MULTIFACTORIAL EXPLANATION OF YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE SPECIAL CASE OF AUSTRIA

Standard Eurobarometer

Eurofound in-house paper: Part-time work in Europe Companies and workers perspective

The European SME Instrument

Using Register information to estimate (early) monthly unemployment rates for EU aggregates

Evaluation of the Part-Time and Fixed-Term Work Directives. Conference on EU Labour Law, 21 October 2013, Brussels

ASSISTANCE SYSTEM IN ROMANIA

L 303/40 Official Journal of the European Union

Equality between women and men in the European Union. Fátima Ribeiro Gender Equality Unit, DG Justice and Consumers

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document

EUROPE 2020 Towards the 2013 Annual Growth Survey

Fiscal competitiveness issues in Romania

Situation of ELVs and unknown whereabouts in the EU

Overview of Eurofound surveys

Investment and Investment Finance in Slovenia

H Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)

EIOPA/ESRB adverse financial market scenarios for insurance stress test

Traffic Safety Basic Facts Main Figures. Traffic Safety Basic Facts Traffic Safety. Motorways Basic Facts 2015.

EU Pigmeat Market Situation. Meat Market Observatory Economic Board meeting 02 October 2018

Gender pension gap economic perspective

H Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)

H Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)

Public data underlying the figures of Annual Report on the Results of Monitoring the Internal Electricity and Natural Gas Markets in 2015

European communications providers' access to

Transcription:

Part C. Impact on sample design Ing. Marie Hörmannová, CSc. Business Cycle Surveys Department

Introduction In December 2006, the European Council adopted the regulation establishing the revised EU statistical classification of economic activities, NACE Rev. 2. The implementation of NACE Rev. 2 will be spread over 5 years, starting from 1 January 2008. The revision of NACE will have a major impact on business surveys, too. The questionnaire on NACE Rev. 2 is divided into three parts corresponding to the three issues identified as the most relevant: Implementation date (Part A); Reconstructing historical time series (Part B); and Impact on sample design (Part C) This presentation deals with the Part C of the questionnaire.

C1. Do you consider that the current sizes of your different samples are large enough to ensure the statistical precision of balances once converted into NACE Rev. 2? Answer Number of Countries Yes 18 Countries AT BE BG CY CZ DK EE EL ES FR HU IT LT LU MT PL SI SK No 6 DE LV NL SE TR UK N/A 1 RO comment: several respondents with answer yes additionally think that the current sample size is sufficient, however, there might be some problems concerning specific sub-sectors these will be treated especially

C2. Do you plan to modify the size of the industry sample? Yes, we plan to enlarge the sample No 14 9 AT CY DE LV MT SE SK TR UK BE BG CZ DK EE ES FR HU IT LT LU NL PL SI N/A 2 EL RO comment: several respondents (both yes and no answer) say that they will enlarge the sample if it is necessary in particular sub-sectors; AT would enlarge the sample in any case; LU has enlarged the sample in 2007.

C3. Do you plan to modify the size of the investment sample? Yes, we plan to enlarge the sample No 14 7 AT CY DE LV SE SK UK BE BG CZ DK EE ES FR HU IT LT LU NL PL SI N/A 4 EL MT RO TR comment: most respondents are not going to enlarge the investment survey sample.

C4. Do you plan to modify the size of the services sample? Yes, we plan to enlarge the sample 11 AT CY CZ DE LT LV MT NL SI SK UK No 8 BE BG DK EE FR HU IT PL N/A 6 EL ES LU RO SE TR comment: services sample is the one that will be enlarged by most countries due to the NACE Rev. 2 implementation. 11 countries consider services sample enlargement necessary.

C5. Do you plan to modify the size of the retail trade sample? Yes, we plan to enlarge the sample 5 CY DE LV SK UK No 13 N/A 7 AT BE BG CZ DK EE FR HU IT LT NL PL SI EL ES LU MT RO SE TR comment: as opposed to services, most respondents are not going to enlarge the retail trade survey sample.

C6. Do you plan to modify the size of the construction sample? Yes, we plan to enlarge the sample 7 AT CY DE ES LV SI SK No 11 N/A 6 BE BG CZ DK EE FR HU IT LU NL PL EL MT RO SE TR UK comment: In general, most respondents are not going to enlarge the sample here. LT even plans to reduce the sample in construction.

Remarks to questions C2 C6 remark 1: CY DE LV SK plan to enlarge all samples remark 2: IT PL FR BE BG DK EE HU plan not to change any of the samples remark 3: most countires (11) plan to enlarge the services survey sample; 9 plan to enlarge industry sample. remark 4: only LT plans to reduce the sample (in construction)

C7. In general, do you update your survey samples every year? Yes 20 AT BG CZ DE DK EE EL ES FR HU LT LU LV NL PL RO SE SI TR UK No 5 BE CY IT MT SK comment: IT and MT update the sample every two and two or three years, respectively; BE updates the sample when they lose an importatnt respondent; AT updates the sample even more often.

C8. When is the next sample renewal (in accordance with the NACE Rev. 2 survey fields) scheduled? 2007 3 AT LT MT 2008 10 CY CZ EE EL HU LV PL SE SI UK 2009 6 DE DK ES NL RO TR N/A 6 BG FR IT SK BE LU comment: FR will renew the sample once the SBS data are available; MT answered that they would renew the industry sample in 2007.

C9. Which data will constitute the frame of these new samples? Business Registers Data 18 BE BG CZ DK EE EL ES HU LT LU LV MT NL RO SE SI SK UK Definitive SBS Data 4 CY DE FR TR Other 3 AT IT PL comment: AT - Database of the Members of the Austrian Chamber of Commerce, which is "synchronised" with the business register of the statistical office; PL - enterprises answering to the yearly surveys; IT - N/A

Conclusion All respondents feel the importance of the NACE Rev. 2 implementation to BCS sector They will adjust namely the samples in services and industry (both sectors are affected the most by the revision) The implementation will be difficult however all respondents feel that it will improve the quality of the BCS data. The main objective of the whole process of the NACE Rev. 2 implementation is to ensure representative results in all sectors and namely sub-sectors covered by the BCS surveys.

Thank you for your attention!