New tools of set-theoretic homological algebra and their applications to modules

Similar documents
Some Remarks on Finitely Quasi-injective Modules

The (λ, κ)-fn and the order theory of bases in boolean algebras

Philipp Moritz Lücke

Projective Lattices. with applications to isotope maps and databases. Ralph Freese CLA La Rochelle

CARDINALITIES OF RESIDUE FIELDS OF NOETHERIAN INTEGRAL DOMAINS

Continuous images of closed sets in generalized Baire spaces ESI Workshop: Forcing and Large Cardinals

TENSOR PRODUCT IN CATEGORY O κ.

THE NUMBER OF UNARY CLONES CONTAINING THE PERMUTATIONS ON AN INFINITE SET

Laurence Boxer and Ismet KARACA

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.lo] 15 Jan 1991

COMBINATORICS OF REDUCTIONS BETWEEN EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS

ADDING A LOT OF COHEN REALS BY ADDING A FEW II. 1. Introduction

UPWARD STABILITY TRANSFER FOR TAME ABSTRACT ELEMENTARY CLASSES

Generalising the weak compactness of ω

AN INFINITE CARDINAL-VALUED KRULL DIMENSION FOR RINGS

FORCING AND THE HALPERN-LÄUCHLI THEOREM. 1. Introduction This document is a continuation of [1]. It is intended to be part of a larger paper.

Gödel algebras free over finite distributive lattices

Laurence Boxer and Ismet KARACA

Sy D. Friedman. August 28, 2001

A Property Equivalent to n-permutability for Infinite Groups

Silver type theorems for collapses.

A HIERARCHY OF RAMSEY-LIKE CARDINALS

Notes to The Resurrection Axioms

Chain conditions, layered partial orders and weak compactness

On the h-vector of a Lattice Path Matroid

Attempt QUESTIONS 1 and 2, and THREE other questions. Do not turn over until you are told to do so by the Invigilator.

Strongly compact Magidor forcing.

κ-bounded Exponential-Logarithmic Power Series Fields

Extender based forcings, fresh sets and Aronszajn trees

PERFECT TREE FORCINGS FOR SINGULAR CARDINALS

MITCHELL S THEOREM REVISITED. Contents

A precipitous club guessing ideal on ω 1

Characterizing large cardinals in terms of layered partial orders

Set- theore(c methods in model theory

An orderly algorithm to enumerate finite (semi)modular lattices

This is an author version of the contribution published in Topology and its Applications

Interpolation of κ-compactness and PCF

Covering properties of derived models

ON THE QUOTIENT SHAPES OF VECTORIAL SPACES. Nikica Uglešić

The finite lattice representation problem and intervals in subgroup lattices of finite groups

GUESSING MODELS IMPLY THE SINGULAR CARDINAL HYPOTHESIS arxiv: v1 [math.lo] 25 Mar 2019

arxiv: v2 [math.lo] 13 Feb 2014

On the Lower Arbitrage Bound of American Contingent Claims

Best response cycles in perfect information games

An effective perfect-set theorem

PARTITIONS OF 2 ω AND COMPLETELY ULTRAMETRIZABLE SPACES

Online Appendix Optimal Time-Consistent Government Debt Maturity D. Debortoli, R. Nunes, P. Yared. A. Proofs

The illustrated zoo of order-preserving functions

Generating all nite modular lattices of a given size

PURITY IN IDEAL LATTICES. Abstract.

arxiv: v1 [math.lo] 27 Mar 2009

LATTICE EFFECT ALGEBRAS DENSELY EMBEDDABLE INTO COMPLETE ONES

Equivalence between Semimartingales and Itô Processes

Generalization by Collapse

ORDERED SEMIGROUPS HAVING THE P -PROPERTY. Niovi Kehayopulu, Michael Tsingelis

Congruence lattices of finite intransitive group acts

being saturated Lemma 0.2 Suppose V = L[E]. Every Woodin cardinal is Woodin with.

The mod 2 Adams Spectral Sequence for tmf

4 Martingales in Discrete-Time

3 The Model Existence Theorem

Double Ore Extensions versus Iterated Ore Extensions

Orthogonality to the value group is the same as generic stability in C-minimal expansions of ACVF

CATEGORICAL SKEW LATTICES

DEPTH OF BOOLEAN ALGEBRAS SHIMON GARTI AND SAHARON SHELAH

Generating all modular lattices of a given size

Determinacy models and good scales at singular cardinals

4: SINGLE-PERIOD MARKET MODELS

INTERVAL DISMANTLABLE LATTICES

Bounds on coloring numbers

MODIFIED EXTENDER BASED FORCING

Simplicity of associative and non-associative Ore extensions

The Semi-Weak Square Principle

On Existence of Equilibria. Bayesian Allocation-Mechanisms

KAPLANSKY'S PROBLEM ON VALUATION RINGS

THE OPERATIONAL PERSPECTIVE

STRONGLY UNFOLDABLE CARDINALS MADE INDESTRUCTIBLE

Short Extenders Forcings II

Combinatorics, Cardinal Characteristics of the Continuum, and the Colouring Calculus

Building Infinite Processes from Regular Conditional Probability Distributions

LARGE CARDINALS AND L-LIKE UNIVERSES

The Turing Definability of the Relation of Computably Enumerable In. S. Barry Cooper

Abstract Algebra Solution of Assignment-1

CONGRUENCES AND IDEALS IN A DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICE WITH RESPECT TO A DERIVATION

Introduction to Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes for Finance Lecture Notes

SHIMON GARTI AND SAHARON SHELAH

On almost precipitous ideals.

An Optimal Odd Unimodular Lattice in Dimension 72

Notes on the symmetric group

Chapter 4. Cardinal Arithmetic.

Modular and Distributive Lattices

Theorem 1.3. Every finite lattice has a congruence-preserving embedding to a finite atomistic lattice.

General Lattice Theory: 1979 Problem Update

On the Splitting Number at Regular Cardinals

A No-Arbitrage Theorem for Uncertain Stock Model

The tree property for supercompactness

Fair semigroups. Valdis Laan. University of Tartu, Estonia. (Joint research with László Márki) 1/19

Supplementary remarks on Frobeniusean algebras.

A relation on 132-avoiding permutation patterns

MESURES DE RISQUE DYNAMIQUES DYNAMIC RISK MEASURES

HEIKE MILDENBERGER AND SAHARON SHELAH

Transcription:

New tools of set-theoretic homological algebra and their applications to modules Jan Trlifaj Univerzita Karlova, Praha Workshop on infinite-dimensional representations of finite dimensional algebras Manchester, September 17th, 2015 Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 1 / 28

Classic structure theory: direct sum decompositions A class of modules C is decomposable, provided that there is a cardinal κ such that each module in C is a direct sum of strongly < κ-presented modules from C. Examples 1. (Kaplansky) The class P 0 of all projective modules is decomposable. 2. (Faith-Walker) The class I 0 of all injective modules is decomposable iff R is a right noetherian ring. 3. (Huisgen-Zimmermann) Mod-R is decomposable iff R is a right pure-semisimple ring. In fact, if M is a module such that Prod(M) is decomposable, then M is Σ-pure-injective. Note: Krull-Schmidt type theorems hold in the cases 2. and 3. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 2 / 28

Such examples, however, are rare in general most classes of modules are not decomposable. Example Assume that the ring R is not right perfect, that is, there is a strictly decreasing chain of principal left ideals Ra 0 Ra n...a 0 Ra n+1 a n...a o... Then the class F 0 of all flat modules is not decomposable. Example There exist arbitrarily large indecomposable flat abelian groups. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 3 / 28

Transfinite extensions Let A Mod R. A module M is A-filtered (or a transfinite extension of the modules in A), provided that there exists an increasing sequence (M α α σ) consisting of submodules of M such that M 0 = 0, M σ = M, M α = β<α M β for each limit ordinal α σ, and for each α < σ, M α+1 /M α is isomorphic to an element of A. Notation: M Filt(A). A class A is filtration closed if Filt(A) = A. Eklof Lemma C = KerExt 1 R (, C) is filtration closed for each class of modules C. In particular, so are the classes P n and F n of all modules of projective and flat dimension n, for each n < ω. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 4 / 28

Deconstructible classes A class of modules A is deconstructible, provided there is a cardinal κ such that A = Filt(A <κ ) where A <κ denotes the class of all strongly < κ-presented modules from A. All decomposable classes closed under direct summands are deconstructible. For each n < ω, the classes P n and F n are deconstructible. [Eklof-T.] More in general, for each set of modules S, the class (S ) is deconstructible. Here, S = KerExt 1 R (S, ). Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 5 / 28

Approximations for relative homological algebra A class of modules A is precovering if for each module M there is f Hom R (A, M) with A A such that each f Hom R (A, M) with A A factorizes through f : The map f is an A precover of M. A f M f A If f is moreover right minimal (that is, f factorizes through itself only by an automorphism of A), then f is an A cover of M. If A provides for covers for all modules, then A is called a covering class. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 6 / 28

The abundance of approximations [Enochs] Each precovering class closed under direct limits is covering. [Enochs], [Šťovíček] All deconstructible classes are precovering. In particular, the class (S ) is precovering for any set of modules S. Note: If R S, then (S ) coincides with the class of all direct summands of S-filtered modules. Flat cover conjecture F 0 is covering for any ring R, and so are the classes F n for each n > 0. The classes P n (n 0) are precovering.... Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 7 / 28

Bass modules Let R be a ring and F be a class of finitely presented modules. lim F denotes the class of all Bass modules over F, that is, the modules ω B that are countable direct limits of modules from F. W.l.o.g., such B is the direct limit of a chain f F 0 f 0 F1 1 f i 1 f... F i f i+1 i Fi+1... with F i F and f i Hom R (F i, F i+1 ) for all i < ω. The classic Bass module Let F be the class of all finitely generated projective modules. Then the Bass modules coincide with the countably presented flat modules. If R is not right perfect, then a classic instance of such a Bass module B arises when F i = R and f i is the left multiplication by a i (i < ω) where Ra 0 Ra n...a 0 Ra n+1 a n...a o... is strictly decreasing. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 8 / 28

Flat Mittag-Leffler modules [Raynaud-Gruson] A module M is flat Mittag-Leffler provided the functor M R is exact, and for each system of left R-modules (N i i I), the canonical map M R i I N i i I M R N i is monic. The class of all flat Mittag-Lefler modules is denoted by FM. P 0 FM F 0. FM is filtration closed and closed under pure submodules. M FM, iff each countable subset of M is contained in a countably generated projective and pure submodule of M. In particular, all countably generated modules in FM are projective. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 9 / 28

Flat Mittag-Leffler modules and approximations Theorem Assume that R is not right perfect. Then the class FM is not precovering, and hence not deconstructible. Idea of proof: Choose a non-projective Bass module B over P <ω 0, and prove that B has no FM-precover. The main tool: Tree modules. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 10 / 28

The trees Let κ be an infinite cardinal, and T κ be the set of all finite sequences of ordinals < κ, so T κ = {τ : n κ n < ω}. Partially ordered by inclusion, T κ is a tree, called the tree on κ. Let Br(T κ ) denote the set of all branches of T κ. Each ν Br(T κ ) can be identified with an ω-sequence of ordinals < κ: Br(T κ ) = {ν : ω κ}. T κ = κ and Br(T κ ) = κ ω. Notation: l(τ) denotes the length of τ for each τ T κ. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 11 / 28

Decorating trees by Bass modules Let D := τ T κ F l(τ), and P := τ T κ F l(τ). For ν Br(T κ ), i < ω, and x F i, we define x νi P by π ν i (x νi ) = x, π ν j (x νi ) = g j 1...g i (x) for each i < j < ω, π τ (x νi ) = 0 otherwise, where π τ Hom R (P, F l(τ) ) denotes the τth projection for each τ T κ. Let X νi := {x νi x F i }. Then X νi is a submodule of P isomorphic to F i. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 12 / 28

The tree modules Let X ν := i<ω X νi, and G := ν Br(T κ) X ν. Basic properties D G P. There is a tree module exact sequence 0 D G B (Br(Tκ)) 0. G is a flat Mittag-Leffler module. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 13 / 28

Proof of the Theorem Assume there exists a FM-precover f : F B of the classic Bass module B. Let K = Ker(f ), so we have an exact sequence 0 K F f B 0. Let κ be an infinite cardinal such that R κ and K 2 κ = κ ω. Consider the tree module exact sequence 0 D G B (2κ) 0, so G FM and D is a free module of rank κ. Clearly, G P 1. Let η : K E be a {G} -preenvelope of K with a {G}-filtered cokernel. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 14 / 28

Consider the pushout 0 K η 0 E 0 0 = F ε P Coker(η) Coker(ε) 0 0 f B 0 g B 0 Then P FM. Since f is an FM-precover, there exists h : P F such that fh = g. Then f = gε = fhε, whence K + Im(h) = F. Let h = h E. Then h : E K and Im(h ) = K Im(h). Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 15 / 28

Consider the restricted exact sequence 0 Im(h ) Im(h) As E G and G P 1, also Im(h ) G. f Im(h) B 0. Applying Hom R (, Im(h )) to the tree-module exact sequence above, we obtain the exact sequence Hom R (D, Im(h )) Ext 1 R (B, Im(h )) 2κ 0 where the first term has cardinality K κ 2 κ, so the second term must be zero. This yields Im(h ) B. Then f Im(h) splits, and so does the FM-precover f, a contradiction with B / FM. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 16 / 28

The role of the Bass modules [Šaroch] Let C be a class of countably presented modules, and L the class of all locally C-free modules. Let B be a Bass module over C such that B is not a direct summand in a module from L. Then B has no L-precover. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 17 / 28

A generalization via tilting theory T is a (large) tilting module provided that T has finite projective dimension, Ext i R (T, T (κ) ) = 0 for each cardinal κ, and there exists an exact sequence 0 R T 0 T r 0 such that r < ω, and for each i < r, T i Add(T), i.e., T i is a direct summand of a (possibly infinite) direct sum of copies of T. B = {T } = 1<i KerExti R (T, ) the right tilting class of T. A = B the left tilting class of T. A B = Add(T). Right tilting classes coincide with the classes of finite type, that is, they have the form S where S is a set of strongly finitely presented modules of bounded projective dimension. A = Filt(A ω ), hence A is precovering. Moreover, A lim A <ω. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 18 / 28

Σ-pure split tilting modules A module M is Σ-pure split provided that each pure embedding N N with N Add(M) splits. A tilting module T is Σ-pure split, iff A = lim A <ω, iff A closed under direct limits. Examples Let T = R. Then T is a tilting module of projective dimension 0, and T is Σ-pure split iff R is a right perfect ring. Each Σ-pure injective tilting module is Σ-pure split. Each finitely generated tilting module over any artin algebra is Σ-pure injective. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 19 / 28

Locally T-free modules Let R be a ring and T a tilting module. A module M is locally T-free provided that M possesses a set H of submodules such that H A ω, each countable subset of M is contained in an element of H, H is closed under unions of countable chains. Let L denote the class of all locally T-free modules. Note: If M is countably generated, then M is locally T-free, iff M A ω. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 20 / 28

Locally T-free modules For any ring R and any tilting module T, we have Example A L lim A <ω. Let R be an arbitrary ring and T = R. Then A = P 0 L = FM lim A <ω = F 0. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 21 / 28

Locally T-free modules and approximations Theorem Let R be a ring and T be a tilting module. Then TFAE: 1 L is (pre)covering. 2 L is deconstructible. 3 T is Σ-pure split. Note: The theorem on flat Mittag-Leffler modules stated earlier is just the particular case of T = R. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 22 / 28

The role of Bass modules, and Enochs Conjecture Theorem L is (pre)covering, iff A is closed under direct limits, iff B A for each Bass module B over A <ω (i.e., lim ω (A <ω ) A). Enochs Conjecture Let C be a class of modules. Then C is covering, iff C is precovering and closed under direct limits. Corollary Enochs Conjecture holds for all left tilting classes of modules. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 23 / 28

A finite dimensional example Let R be an indecomposable hereditary finite dimensional algebra of infinite representation type. Then there is a partition of ind-r into three sets: q... the indecomposable preinjective modules p... the indecomposable preprojective modules t... the regular modules (the rest). Then p is a right tilting class (and M p, iff M has no non-zero direct summands from p). The tilting module T inducing p is called the Lukas tilting module. The left tilting class of T is the class of all Baer modules. The locally T-free modules are called locally Baer modules. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 24 / 28

Non-precovering classes of locally Baer modules Theorem The class of all Baer modules coincides with Filt(p). The Lukas tilting module T is countably generated, but has no finite dimensional direct summands, and it is not Σ-pure split. So L is not precovering (and hence not deconstructible). The Bass modules behind the scene The relevant Bass modules can be obtained as unions of the chains f 0 f 1 P 0 P 1... f i 1 f i f i+1 P i P i+1... such that all the P i are preprojective (i.e., in add(p)), but the cokernels of all the f i are regular (i.e., in add(t)). Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 25 / 28

Almost split maps and sequences Definition Let R be a ring and N a non-projective module. An epimorphism of modules f : M N is right almost split, if f is not split, and if g : P N is not a split epimorphism in Mod R, then g factorizes through f. Dually, we define a left almost split monomorphism f : N M for N non-injective. A short exact sequence of modules 0 N f M f N 0 is almost split, if it does not split, f is a right almost split epimorphism, and f is a left almost split monomorphism. Theorem (Auslander) Let N is an (indecomposable) finitely presented non-projective module with local endomorphism ring. Then there always exists a right almost split epimorphism f : M N. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 26 / 28

Auslander s problem and generalized tree modules Auslander 1975 Are there further cases where a right almost split epimorphism ending in a non-projective module N exists? A negative answer has recently been given using (generalized) tree modules: Theorem (Šaroch 2015) Let R be a ring and N be a non-projective module. TFAE: 1 Then there exists a right almost split epimorphism f : M N. 2 N is finitely presented and its endomorphism ring is local. Corollary Let R be a ring and 0 N M N 0 an almost split sequence in Mod-R. Then N is finitely presented with local endomorphism ring, and N is pure-injective. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 27 / 28

References 1. L.Angeleri Hügel, J.Šaroch, J.Trlifaj: Approximations and Mittag-Leffler conditions, preprint (2015). 2. R.Göbel, J.Trlifaj: Approximations and Endomorphism Algebras of Modules, 2nd rev. ext. ed., GEM 41, W. de Gruyter, Berlin 2012. 3. J. Šaroch, On the non-existence of right almost split maps, preprint, arxiv: 1504.01631v3. 4. A.Slávik, J.Trlifaj: Approximations and locally free modules, Bull. London Math. Soc. 46(2014), 76-90. Jan Trlifaj (Univerzita Karlova, Praha) Set-theoretic homological algebra 28 / 28