Basel II: New Zealand discretions for the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach to credit risk

Similar documents
Quantitative Impact Study 3 Areas of National Discretion. For use by [NAME OF NATIONALITY] banks in completing the QIS 3 Questionnaire

Basel II Implementation Update

Chapter 6 Credit Risk Internal Ratings Based Approach

Risk & Capital Report Incorporating the requirements of APS 330

Superseded document. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. The New Basel Capital Accord. Issued for comment by 31 July 2003

The Internal Ratings-Based (IRB) Approach to Credit Risk

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. Overview of The New Basel Capital Accord. Issued for comment by 31 July 2003

BASEL II EUROCHAMBRES

BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION. To Participants in Quantitative Impact Study 2.5

To: All banks, controlling companies, branches of foreign institutions, eligible institutions and auditors of banks or controlling companies

Financial Stability Institute

Basel II: Application requirements for New Zealand banks seeking accreditation to implement the Basel II internal models approaches from January 2008

QIS Frequently Asked Questions (as of 11 Oct 2002)

Basel II Pillar 3 Disclosures

Commonwealth Bank of Australia ACN

Consultation Paper. Draft Guidelines EBA/CP/2018/03 17/04/2018

Basel III Pillar 3. Capital adequacy and risk disclosures Quarterly Update as at 31 March 2013

Basel II Pillar 3. Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures QUARTERLY UPDATE As at 31 March 2011

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group

Summary of RBNZ response to submissions on the draft capital adequacy framework (internal models based approach)(bs2b)

Basel II Pillar 3. Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures. QUARTERLY UPDATE AS AT 30 September 2011

Incorporating the requirements of APS 330 Half Year Update as at 31 March 2018

RS Official Gazette No 103/2016

Basel II Pillar 3 Market Disclosure 30 June 2017

Basel II Pillar 3 Market Disclosure 30 June 2016

RS Official Gazette Nos 125/2014 and 4/2015

Basel II Pillar 3 - Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures Quarterly update as at 30 September 2009

Consultative Document on reducing variation in credit risk-weighted assets constraints on the use of internal model approaches

Comments on the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision s Consultative Document Revisions to the Standardised Approach for credit risk

Basel II Pillar years of banking on Australia s future. Capital Adequacy and risk disclosures Quarterly update as at 31 MARCH 2012

2011 Risk & Capital. Incorporating the requirements of APS 330

Box C The Regulatory Capital Framework for Residential Mortgages

1. Rationale. BOT Notification No (29 September 2017) - check Page 1 of 155

Pillar 3 Quantitative Disclosure Report For the Financial Year Ended 31 December 2013

2012 Risk & Capital Report Incorporating the requirements of APS 330

2014 Pillar 3 Report. Incorporating the requirements of APS 330 Half Year Update as at 31 March 2014

PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES Year Ended 31 December 2012

2013 Risk & Capital Report

Basel III Information

Capital Adequacy (Consolidated) [Disclosure under Basel II Pillar III]

January 19, Basel III Capital Standards Requests for Clarification

Basel II Pillar 3 Disclosures Year ended 31 December 2009

Basel III Information

2016 Pillar 3 Report. Incorporating the requirements of APS 330 First Quarter Update as at 31 December 2015

The Revised Standardised Approach. October 19, 2015 Caio Ferreira

Risk & Capital Report Incorporating the requirements of APS 330

Basel III Pillar 3. Capital Adequacy and Risks Disclosures as at 31 December 2017

Pillar III Disclosures

Table of Contents. For further information contact: Investor Relations Warwick Bryan Phone: Facsimile: com.

Basel II. Position paper on the. 3 rd Consultative Document issued by the Basel Committee

The Use of IFRS for Prudential and Regulatory Purposes Alignment of capital, regulatory, and accounting requirements

BASEL II PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURE

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Quantitative Impact Study 3 Technical Guidance

Finalising Basel II: The Way from the Third Consultative Document to Basel II Implementation

Fédération Bancaire Française Responses to CP 18

Pillar 3 Disclosure Report For the First Half 2013

WBG Survey on proposed revisions to Basel II Finding

Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (Translation of registrant s name into English)

ANZ NATIONAL BANK LIMITED GROUP GENERAL SHORT FORM DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURE APS 330: PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

2016 PILLAR 3 REPORT. Incorporating the requirements of APS 330 Third Quarter Update as at 30 June 2016

Pillar 3 Disclosure Report

Basel III Information

WRITTEN NOTICE - IRB PERMISSION

Basel II Pillar 3 Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures. Determined to be better than we ve ever been. as at 31 December 2009

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Basel III Pillar 3. Capital Adequacy and Risks Disclosures as at 31 December 2016

Pillar 3 Disclosures (OCBC Group As at 30 June 2018)

Pillar 3 report. Table of Contents. Introduction 1. Scope of Application 2. Capital 3. Credit Risk Exposures 4. Credit Provision and Losses 6

Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms

Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking Corporation

The New Capital Adequacy Framework Basel II

Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

UBS Bank (Canada) Basel Pillar III Disclosures Calendar Year 2014

Liquidity Coverage Ratio Information (Consolidated) Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. High-level summary of Basel III reforms

Basel II Pillar 3. Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures as at 31 December Determined to be better than we ve ever been.

COREP - EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE TEMPLATES

Basel II. Stefan Hohl,, BIS Representative Office for Asia and the Pacific Bank for International Settlements

Capital Ratio Information (Consolidated) Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation and Subsidiaries

PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURE APS 330: PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

Call for advice to the EBA for the purposes of revising the own fund requirements for credit, operational, market and credit valuation adjustment risk

Capital Adequacy (Consolidated)

Basel II and Financial Stability: Singapore s Experience

Basel III: Proposed Revisions to Standardized Approach to Credit Risk

Basel II Pillar 3 disclosures

UNITED OVERSEAS BANK (MALAYSIA) BHD (Company No K) AND ITS SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES (Incorporated in Malaysia)

Pillar III Disclosures. Al Rajhi Bank

Pillar III Disclosures. Al Rajhi Bank

PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Second Working Paper on Securitisation. Issued for comment by 20 December 2002

Guideline. Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR) Structured Credit Products. Effective Date: November 2017 / January

Post-RCAP follow-up report: Switzerland

Pillar 3 Disclosures (OCBC Group As at 31 December 2014)

Pillar 3 Disclosures (OCBC Group As at 31 December 2016)

HSBC Bank Canada Capital and Risk Management Pillar 3 Supplemental Disclosures as at June 30, The World s Local Bank

Comments on the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision s Consultative Document Review of the Pillar 3 Disclosure Requirements

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring ad hoc exercise

HSBC Bank Canada Capital and Risk Management Pillar 3 Supplemental Disclosures as at September 30, The World s Local Bank

ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited Registered Bank Disclosure Statement FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED 31 MARCH 2015 NUMBER 77 ISSUED MAY 2015

Transcription:

Basel II: New Zealand discretions for the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach to credit risk Reserve Bank of New Zealand Exposure Draft March 2006

2 The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has developed a framework for bank capital adequacy called the International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards, commonly referred to as Basel II. The Reserve Bank, like many other bank supervisors, has indicated that it plans to incorporate Basel II into its bank capital adequacy requirements, adapted where relevant to take account of the features of the New Zealand financial system. The Basel II framework explicitly provides national bank supervisors with options on how to apply Basel II in their jurisdiction. These options are often referred to as national discretions. This exposure draft outlines the Reserve Bank s preliminary thinking on how to treat the national discretions available under Basel II s internal ratings-based (IRB) approach to credit risk. This exposure draft is intended to provide those banks planning to apply for accreditation to use the internal models approaches with an early indication of the Reserve Bank s thinking on the IRB national discretions, which can be incorporated into their application. The exposure draft does not provide finalised Reserve Bank policy positions, nor is it intended as a consultation paper. The national discretions will form part of the Reserve Bank s revised capital adequacy requirements, and will be consulted on when the Reserve Bank releases its proposed requirements later in 2006.

3 Ref # Summary of Basel II Framework discretion Framework paragraph # Adoption of IRB approaches across asset classes and transition arrangements 1 Supervisors may allow a phased rollout of the IRB approach across the banking group 2 Supervisors may exempt some banks from being required to adopt IRB approaches for non-significant business units/asset classes 3 Supervisors may relax the data requirements for the IRB approaches during the transition period Foundation IRB approach 4 Supervisors may choose to employ a wider definition of subordination in determining FIRB LGDs 5 Supervisors may require banks using FIRB to make an explicit maturity adjustment for corporate exposures to measure effective maturity instead of assuming all exposures have a 2.5 year maturity 6 Supervisors may recognise the credit mitigating effects of other forms of physical collateral under FIRB Corporate, sovereign, and bank exposures 7 Supervisors may permit banks to base the SME adjustment on the firm s total assets as a failsafe when total sales is not a meaningful indicator of firm size 8 Supervisors may allow banks to assign preferential risk weights for unexpected loss of 50% to strong and 70% to good PF, OF, CF, and IPRE specialised lending exposures under the slotting approach provided that they meet maturity or other requirements 9 Supervisors may allow banks that meet the requirements for PD estimations for highvalue commercial real estate to use an approach that is similar to the corporate approach, though with a higher correlation assumption 10 Supervisors may allow banks to assign preferential risk weights for unexpected loss of 70% to strong and 95% to good HVCRE specialised lending exposures under the slotting approach provided that they meet maturity or other requirements Retail 11 Supervisors may wish to establish exposure thresholds to distinguish between retail and corporate exposures 12 Supervisors may set limits on the maximum number of housing units per residential mortgage exposure 13 Supervisors may set a minimum number of exposures within a pool to be treated as retail 14 Supervisors may mandate seasoning adjustments Equity 15 Supervisors will decide which approach(es) (market-based or PD/LGD) will be used for Propose exercising the discretion? 257 Yes case-by-case assessment and may be subject to consideration under pillar 2. Business areas not using the IRB approach will be required to calculate capital requirements for those business areas using the standardised approach. 259 Yes case-by-case assessment based on materiality criteria. 264-265 288 318 521 273-274 Yes we will provide guidance in the requirements about when the firm s assets can be used. 277 250-251. We propose not having a HVCRE specialised lending subasset class. 282 N/A. We propose not having a HVCRE specialised lending subasset class. 231 first bullet point 231 second bullet point 232 467 341-342 Only the market-based approach will be available. We propose having

4 equity exposures, and under what circumstances 16 Supervisors may allow banks to employ different market-based approaches (the simple or internal-models methods) 17 Supervisors may exclude equity holdings in entities whose debt qualifies for a zero risk weight under the standardised approach from being treated under the IRB equity method 18 Supervisors may exclude equity holdings made under legislated programmes from being treated under the IRB equity method (subject to limits) 19 Supervisors may exclude equity holdings from being treated under the IRB equity method on the basis of materiality 20 Supervisors may require a bank to employ one of the IRB equity approaches if its exposures are significant (even if it does not employ an IRB approach for other business lines) 21 Supervisors may allow debt obligations that have the economic substance of equity not to be treated as equity where they are hedged by an equity holding such that the net position does not involve material risk. 22 Supervisors may re-characterise debt holdings as equities for regulatory purposes and otherwise ensure the proper treatment under pillar 2 23 Supervisors may exempt particular currently held equity investments from IRB treatment for 10 years Purchased receivables 24 Supervisors must establish concentration limits for corporate purchased receivables above which the bottom-up approach for calculating default risk must be used. 25 Supervisors may allow banks to recognise guarantors with a PD equivalent to less than A- under FIRB when calculating dilution risk capital requirements Maturity adjustment 26 Supervisors may exempt facilities to smaller domestic corporate borrowers (< 500 million in assets and sales) from having an explicit maturity adjustment made for them 27 Supervisors need to determine which instruments will be allowed to be part of the carve-out from the one-year maturity floor Minimum requirements 28 Supervisors may require banks that lend to a diverse range of borrowers to have a greater number of borrower grades than the minimum (7 non-defaulted, 1 defaulted) 29 Supervisors may require an external audit of the bank s rating assignment process and loss materiality thresholds for equity holdings in non-financial companies above which the holding must be deducted from capital. We propose setting these thresholds at 15% of total capital for individual exposures and 60% of total capital for all such exposures. 343-349 Only the simple market-based approach will be available. Standardised banks will also be required to risk weight their equity holdings in the banking book using the simple market-based approach. 356 N/A 357 N/A 358 N/A 260 N/A Footnote 59 to paragraph 237 238. The treatment of debt obligations that have equity characteristics may be considered under pillar 2. 267-269 N/A 242 forth bullet point Footnote 78 to paragraph 373 NZ$100,000 concentration limit 319 321-322 Allow the short-term exposures listed in paragraph 322 of the Framework to be eligible for the carve-out from the one year maturity floor. 404 443. The Reserve Bank s s.95 powers can be used if needed.

5 characteristic estimation process 30 Supervisors may substitute a figure of up to 180 days instead of 90 days as the past-due criterion for default for retail and public-sector entity obligations 31 Supervisors may choose to apply more specific re-aging requirements 32 Converting thresholds in the Basel II framework to NZ$ Footnote 82 to paragraph 452 458 To be determined. Specific re-aging requirements planned by home supervisors of New Zealand banks will be an important consideration. Various Use a 1:NZ$1 conversion rate paragraphs