Online appendix to Understanding Weak Capital Investment: the Role of Market Concentration and Intangibles

Similar documents
Kansas Department of Revenue Office of Policy and Research State Sales Tax Collections by NAICS

Kansas Department of Revenue Office of Policy and Research State Sales Tax Collections by NAICS Calendar Year 2007 January-07.

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION Office of Workforce Information and Performance 1100 North Eutaw Street Baltimore, MD 21201

FRIENDSWOOD PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM FORM

This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research

Animal Production, Dairy, Beef, Sheep, Chickens, Etc $ Forestry Management and Sales Standing Timber Only $350.

Sole Proprietorship Returns, 2004

EMPLOYEE TENURE IN 2014

INTANGIBLE CAPITAL: IMPLICATIONS FOR INVESTMENT AND MARKET STRUCTURE. Janice Eberly 1,2

An Economic Impact Analysis of a Proposed Downtown Centre for the City of Moncton

GOAL 6 FIRMS PARTICIPATING IN FOREIGN EXPORT TRADE

A Comparison of Official and EUKLEMS estimates of MFP Growth for Canada. Wulong Gu Economic Analysis Division Statistics Canada.

LOUISIANA EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES October 2002

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

Kavet, Rockler & Associates, LLC

Industry Employment Projections. Overview of Employment Growth. Ashley Leach, Economist. 1 Projected Employment Growth by Substate Area

Economic Impact Study Sports City, St. Albert, Alberta

SHORT TERM DISABILITY. benefits for employees that benefit employers

Employment Situation: Ohio and U.S. (Seasonally Adjusted) 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 -5,000. In This Issue

Financial Statements Statistics of Corporations by Industry, Annually

Employment Situation: Ohio and U.S. (Seasonally Adjusted) 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000. In This Issue

SHORT TERM DISABILITY. benefits for employees that benefit employers

MASS LAYOFFS DECEMBER 2012 ANNUAL TOTALS 2012

Then one-cap subtitle follows, comparisons both in 36-point Arial bold

Alaska s Non-Petroleum Corporate Income Tax. Trends in Collections by Sector and Revised Corporate Income Tax Forecast Model

Tetrad The Galleria Nielsen 2014 Business-Facts

Finnish affiliates abroad Basic information. Affiliates. Data on personnel. Respondent s contact details

Missouri Economic Indicator Brief: Manufacturing Industries

Employment Trends, Seasonality and Cycles in Canada

Sears Tower 233 S Wacker Dr. Nielsen Business-Facts

Understanding Weak Capital Investment: the Role of Market Concentration and Intangibles Nicolas Crouzet and Janice Eberly

Capitol Region Industry Clusters of Opportunity

State of California January 22, 2010 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT S. Bascom Ave. (408) Campbell, CA 95008

Special Purpose Industrial. Commercial. Residential. Mixed Use. Use Category Specific Use Type. Zoning Districts. Ref NAICS.

HOUSTON-THE WOODLANDS-SUGAR LAND METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA (H-W-S MSA) Visit our website at

Nigerian Gross Domestic Product Report

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Business Commons

Montana Occupational Health & Safety Surveillance

Is the Weekend Effect Really a Weekend Effect?

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

Great Lakes & St. Lawrence Region 2015 Economy Profile Update

The most recent BLS projections

Supplemental Table I. WTO impact by industry

Hyunbae Chun (Sogang University) Hak K. Pyo (Seoul National University) Keun Hee Rhee (Korea Productivity Center)

Investigating New Zealand-Australia Productivity Differences: New Comparisons at Industry Level

Nevada Imposes a New Commerce Tax on Businesses

Alberta led all Provinces in Economic Growth in 2014

TIN APPLICATION FORM LIST OF VALUES INDIVIDUAL ENTRPRISE AND NON-INDIVIDUAL ENTERPRISE

Prepared by. Prepared for. Constant I. Tra, Ph.D., Associate Director Center for Business and Economic Research University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Macroeconomic Impact Estimates of Governor Riley s 2003 Accountability and Tax Reform Package

Kavet, Rockler & Associates, LLC

Foreign Affiliates Statistics

ECONOMIC REPORT CARD. Quarter 3 (July 1 - Sept 30, 2017)

Nigerian Gross Domestic Product Report

Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation

41.8 hours per week, respectively. Workers in the. clothing and chemicals and chemical products industries on average worked less than other

Impact of Riverboat Gambling on the Business Climate in Lake County, Indiana

Scotland's Exports

Analysis Presentation Assumptions

Keller Graduate School of Management Tysons Corner Center. Applied Managerial Statistics and Quality (GM533)

FDI and FATS statistics and tourism

2015 A Record Year for Indiana Tourism. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

TAX CREDITS FOR GROWING BUSINESSES ACT 2011 REPORT

Nigerian Gross Domestic Product Report

Revised October 17, 2016

SASKATCHEWAN WAGE SURVEY 2013: MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY DETAILED REPORT

Intangibles, Investment, and Efficiency

Note on the effect of FDI on export diversification in Central and Eastern Europe

Employment Data (establishment)

CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH. Union Membership Byte 2018

THE ECONOMIC BASE OF ARIZONA, METROPOLITAN PHOENIX, METROPOLITAN TUCSON, THE BALANCE OF THE STATE, AND CHANDLER

Nevada Commerce Tax Narrative. Prepared by Commerce Tax Division

Ontario Collective Bargaining Agreement Expirations 2014

Congress continues to consider moving to

Nigerian Gross Domestic Product Report

Estimating New Zealand s tradable and nontradable sectors using Input-Output Tables 1

Nonemployer Statistics An Indicator of Virginia s Gig Economy

Declining Rate of Return on Capital and the Role of Intangibles in Japan and Korea

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1 Ashburton District Annual Economic Profile 2016

Internet address: USDL

APPENDIX to Pyramidal Ownership and the Creation of New Firms

Measuring Productivity in the Public Sector: A personal view

Online Appendix: Tariffs and Firm Performance in Ethiopia

PRODUCTIVITY AND COSTS Third Quarter 2011, Revised

Oregon s Payroll Employment Dropped by 6,400 in February While the Unemployment Rate Held Steady at 8.8 Percent

G.D. 332/ STATE AID SCHEME to support investments promoting regional development by creating jobs

STATISTICS CANADA RELEASES 2016 GDP DATA

Merchant Referral Program Introduction

Oregon s Unemployment Rate Was Unchanged at 8.4 Percent in February, as Payroll Employment Grew by 6,800. Millions

Table 1: Major Indicators of Labor Market Activity for New Jersey Seasonally Adjusted 2016 Benchmark Labor Force Data (resident)

18th International INFORUM Conference, Hikone, September 6 to September 12, Commodity taxes, commodity subsidies, margins and the like

Supply and Use Tables for Macedonia. Prepared by: Lidija Kralevska Skopje, February 2016

The Economic Impact of International Education in British Columbia

PRESS RELEASE. The Overall Turnover Index in Industry in July 2017, compared with June 2017, recorded an increase of 2.1% (Table 6).

National Accounts GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT BY PRODUCTION, INCOME AND EXPENDITURE APPROACH

UPDATED MANUFACTURING MULTIPLIERS FROM 2007/08 DATA

INTENTIONAL JOB DISCRIMINATION IN METROPOLITAN AMERICA PART II THE NATIONAL PORTRAIT OF VISIBLE INTENTIONAL JOB DISCRIMINATION

Note. Everything in today s paper is new relative to the paper Stigler accepted

REGIONAL SNAPSHOT. Eastern Shore Region, Virginia

Transcription:

Online appendix to Understanding Weak Capital Investment: the Role of Market Concentration and Intangibles Nicolas Crouzet and Janice Eberly This version: September 6, 2018 We report results of the analysis of section 4.2.1 of the paper, on markups, with markup measures adjusted for the fact that xsga contains variable input costs potentially complementary with intangible capital. Figure 1 and tables 1 and 3 report results for the following markup measure: µ Lerner = 1 1 oibdp sale = sale sale + xsga, where the second equality uses the fact that oibdp = sale cogs xsga. This is the profit-margin based measure of markups discussed in the note of Gutierrez & Philippon (2018). Figure 2 and tables 2 and 4 report results from a similar markup measure, but were R&D expenditures, xrd (which may not primarily represent variable inputs) are substracted from xsga. This follows the treatment of SG&A in Peters and Taylor (2017), appendix B.1. Crouzet: Northwestern University; Eberly: Northwestern University and NBER. 1

Dependent variable : log(sale/(xsga+cogs)) Compustat intangible share s t (OLS) 0.013 0.045 *** 0.180 *** 0.135 *** ( 1.53) (3.18) (7.88) (4.46) Compustat intangible share s t (IV) 0.026 *** 0.072 0.282 *** 0.309 *** ( 3.36) (0.84) (5.85) (20.85) First-stage F-stat 802.12 10.47 89.31 617.89 Observations 56 504 168 112 Industry f.e. Yes Yes Yes Yes Table 1: Industry-level relationship between markups and the share of intangible assets, with markups for SG&A. The dependent variable is the log of the industry-wide average markup, defined as the ratio sale/(cogs + xsga), adjusted to match the Hall (2018) industry averages. Results are reported separately for 4 broad group of sectors. All regressions contain industry effects. The first panel reports the simple OLS coefficient, while the second panel report coefficients when the Compustat intangible share is instrumented using the BEA measure of intangibles. The t-statistics reported in parentheses are computed using heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors. Cragg-Donald F statistic reported for the first stage. * : p < 0.10, ** : p < 0.05, *** : p < 0.01. Dependent variable : log(sale/(xsga+cogs-xrd)) Compustat intangible share s t (OLS) 0.043 *** 0.027 0.245 *** 0.268 *** ( 3.73) (1.86) (6.59) (5.80) Compustat intangible share s t (IV) 0.061 *** 0.178 0.442 *** 0.565 *** ( 6.97) (1.81) (5.50) (24.19) First-stage F-stat 802.12 10.47 89.31 617.89 Observations 56 504 168 112 Industry f.e. Yes Yes Yes Yes Table 2: Industry-level relationship between markups and the share of intangible assets, with markups for SG&A, but removing R&D. The dependent variable is the log of the industry-wide average markup, defined as the ratio sale/(cogs + xsga xrd), adjusted to match the Hall (2018) industry averages. Everything is the same as in table 1 otherwise. * : p < 0.10, ** : p < 0.05, *** : p < 0.01. 2

1.4 5 5 1.15 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 sales/cogs, adj. to Hall (2018) sales/(cogs+xsga) sales/(cogs+xsga), adj. to Hall (2018) (a) 1.4 Consumer 1.8 1.6 High-tech 1.1 1.4 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Healthcare Manufacturing 1.1 1 5.9 1.15 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 sales/cogs, adj. to Hall (2018) sales/(cogs+xsga) sales/(cogs+xsga), adj. to Hall (2018) (b) Figure 1: Trends in markups, adjusted and unadjusted for SG&A. The grey line is identical to figures 10a and 10b of the paper; it reports weighted averages of the ratio sale/cogs, adjusted to match the Hall (2018) averages at the industry level. The green lines report the same averages, for the ratio sale/(cogs + xsga). All estimates are constructed at the KLEMS industry level first, then averaged across industries using their share of nominal value added in 2001. At the industry level, the markup ratios are averaged using firm-level sales in that year as weights. Markups are winsorized at the 1 st and 99 th percentiles, by year. Finally, the agricultural and mining sectors are dropped, as markup measures obtained using the KLEMS data are negative in both cases. 3

1.4 5 5 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 sales/cogs, adj. to Hall (2018) sales/(cogs+xsga-xrd) sales/(cogs+xsga-xrd), adj. to Hall (2018) (a) 1.4 Consumer 1.8 1.6 High-tech 1.4 1.1 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 1.1 1.9 Healthcare 5 Manufacturing 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 sales/cogs, adj. to Hall (2018) sales/(cogs+xsga-xrd) sales/(cogs+xsga-xrd), adj. to Hall (2018) (b) Figure 2: Trends in markups, adjusted and unadjusted for SG&A, but removing R&D from SG&A. The grey line is identical to figure 10a and 10b of the paper; it reports weighted averages of the ratio sale/cogs, adjusted to match the Hall (2018) averages at the industry level. The green lines report the same averages, for the ratio sale/(cogs + xsga xrd). Everything is the same as in figures 2a and 2b otherwise. 4

Panel A Dependent variable : log(sale/(xsga+cogs)) Cross-sectional (between) regressions Compustat intangible share s j,t 0.002 0.040 *** 0.055 *** 0.051 ** (OLS) (0.14) (3.64) (4.55) (2.12) Compustat intangible share s j,t 0.248 *** 0.109 ** 0.125 ** 0.025 *** (IV) ( 3.99) ( 2.47) (2.29) (5.92) First-stage F stat 71.5 216.4 49.8 86.0 Observations 8027 24436 19730 10296 Firms 646 1726 1718 878 Firm-level controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Standard error clustering Industry-year and firm Industry-year and firm Industry-year and firm Industry-year and firm Industry-year f.e. Yes Yes Yes Yes Firm f.e. No No No No Panel B Panel (within) regressions Compustat intangible share s j,t 0.020 *** 0.033 *** 0.014 0.069 *** (OLS) (3.74) (3.60) (0) (2.86) Compustat intangible share s j,t 0.302 *** 0.553 ** 0.160 * 0.627 ** (IV) ( 2.80) (1.99) ( 1.82) (2.06) First-stage F stat 13.7 16.1 29.5 11.1 Observations 8027 24436 19730 10296 Firms 646 1726 1718 878 Firm-level controls Yes (excl. age) Yes (excl. age) Yes (excl. age) Yes (excl. age) Standard error clustering Industry-year and firm Industry-year and firm Industry-year and firm Industry-year and firm Industry-year f.e. Yes Yes Yes Yes Firm f.e. Yes Yes Yes Yes Table 3: Firm-level relationship between intangibles and markups. The dependent variable is log (sale/(cogs + xsga)). Panel A reports results from specifications without firm fixed effects, while panel B reports results from specifications with firm fixed effects. The Compustat intangible share is intan/(ppegt + intan). The instruments in the IV specifications are either the ratio of capitalized R&D expenditures to capital (excluding balance sheet intangibles), k know /(k know + k org + ppegt), or the ratio of (a fraction of) capitalized SG&A expenditures to capital, k org/(k know + k org + ppegt), or both. The variables k know and k org are obtained from?. All dependent variables are measured at the beginning of the observation year. Firm controls are: size (log(ppegt)), age (years since first appearance in CRSP), leverage ((dlc+dltt)/at), and cash flow to assets (ebitda/at). Kleibergen-Paap (KP) Wald F statistics are reported for the IV specifications. The excluded instruments (the Peters-Taylor intangible shares) are selected according to the following criterion: if the KP statistic is higher than the Stock-Yogo critical values for 15% maximal IV size, keep both; otherwise, keep the one with the highest KP statistics. This criterion selects both the SG&A and R&D share for the High-tech and Manufacturing sector, and only the SG&A share for Consumer and Healthcare sectors. * : p < 0.10, ** : p < 0.05, *** : p < 0.01.

Panel A Dependent variable : log(sale/(xsga+cogs-xrd)) Cross-sectional (between) regressions Compustat intangible share s j,t 0.007 0.020 *** 0.043 *** 0.159 *** (OLS) ( 0.50) (1.58) (2.78) (3.21) Compustat intangible share s j,t 0.342 *** 0.153 ** 0.012 0.695 *** (IV) ( 4.11) ( 2.68) (1.76) (3.37) First-stage F stat 77.0 202.5 42.5 79.9 Observations 8027 24436 19730 10296 Firms 646 1726 1718 878 Firm-level controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Standard error clustering Industry-year and firm Industry-year and firm Industry-year and firm Industry-year and firm Industry-year f.e. Yes Yes Yes Yes Firm f.e. No No No No Panel B Panel (within) regressions Compustat intangible share s j,t 0.018 *** 0.026 *** 0.019 0.059 *** (OLS) (3.10) (2.93) (1.52) (1.56) Compustat intangible share s j,t 0.267 *** 0.585 ** 0.192 * 1.192 ** (IV) ( 2.27) ( 2.13) (1.89) (2.24) First-stage F stat 11.7 19.9 32.5 10.6 Observations 8027 24436 19730 10296 Firms 646 1726 1718 878 Firm-level controls Yes (excl. age) Yes (excl. age) Yes (excl. age) Yes (excl. age) Standard error clustering Industry-year and firm Industry-year and firm Industry-year and firm Industry-year and firm Industry-year f.e. Yes Yes Yes Yes Firm f.e. Yes Yes Yes Yes Table 4: Firm-level relationship between intangibles and markups. The dependent variable is log (sale/(cogs + xsga xrd)). Otherwise, things are the same as in table 3. * : p < 0.10, ** : p < 0.05, *** : p < 0.01.

.11.1.09.08.07.06 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Aggregate investment (BEA; raw data) Aggregate investment (BEA; weighting by 2001 capital shares, and assuming constant investment rates in Consumer and High-tech sectors) Aggregate investment (BEA; weighting by 2001 capital shares) Figure 3: Actual and counterfactual investment rates. The data are from the BEA fixed asset tables. The black line reports the aggregate investment rate (it differs slightly from figures in the main text because that figure weights KLEMS sectors by their share of value added; this figure effectively weighs them by their share of capital). The dashed grey line represents the aggregate investment rate, keeping the composition of the capital stock between KLEMS industries fixed to 2001. Finally, the dashed blue line represents the aggregate investment rate, keeping the composition of the capital stock fixed to 2001, and assuming that KLEMS industries in the Consumer and High-tech groups had kept investing at the same rate as in 2001. 7

Sector (4-sector classification) Share of value added (2001) Sector (12-sector classification) Share of value added (2001) Subsectors Share of value added (2001) BEA sector code KLEMS/BLS sector code Underlying NAICS 2D/3D sectors in Compustat Consumer 0.170 Wholesale & Retail trade 0.156 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 0.014 Crop & Animal Production (Farms) Retail Trade 0.085 44RT 44 44 Wholesale Trade 0.071 4200 42 42 0.014 110C 111,112 111 to 112 Computer and Electronic Products 0.024 3340 334 334 High-tech 0.097 IT & software 0.063 Publishing industries, except internet (includes software) Computer Systems Design and Related Services Data processing, internet publishing, and other information services 0.017 5110 511 511 0.017 5415 5415 5415 0.006 5140 518,519 518 to 519 Telecoms & Broadcasting 0.034 Broadcasting and telecommunications Motion picture and sound recording industries 0.026 5130 515,517 515 to 517 0.009 5120 512 512 Healthcare 0.089 Healthcare 0.089 Ambulatory Health Care Services 0.040 6210 621 621 Chemical Products 0.027 3250 325 325 Hospitals and Nursing and Residential Care Facilities 0.013 622H and 6230 622,623 622 to 623 Miscellaneous Manufacturing 0.008 3390 339 339 Manufacturing 0.187 Manufacturing 0.146 Transportation Equipment 0.028 336M and 336O 336 336 Food and Beverage and Tobacco Products 0.023 311A 311,312 311 to 312 Fabricated Metal Products 0.016 3320 332 332 Machinery 0.015 3330 333 333 Petroleum and Coal Products 0.010 3240 324 324 Plastics and Rubber Products 0.009 3260 326 326 Paper Products 0.008 3220 322 322 Electrical Equipment, Appliances, and Components 0.006 3350 335 335 Nonmetallic Mineral Products 0.006 3270 327 327 Primary Metal Products 0.006 3310 331 331 Printing and Related Support Activities 0.006 3230 323 323 Furniture and Related Products 0.004 3370 337 337 Wood Products 0.004 3210 321 321 Textile Mills and Textile Product Mills Apparel and Leather and Applied Products 0.004 313T 313,314 313 to 314 0.003 315A 315,316 315 to 316 Utilities 0.026 Utilities 0.026 2200 22 221 Mining and Oil & Gas 0.016 Oil and Gas Extraction 0.010 2110 211 211 Mining, except Oil and Gas 0.003 2120 212 212 Support Activities for Mining 0.003 2130 213 213 [CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE] Table 5: Industry classification. We aggregate the NAICS 2 and 3-digit classification in order to be use both the BEA fixed asset tables for measuring the intangible capital stock, and the KLEMS/BLS data for measuring markups and productivity. Some BEA and KLEMS sectors are dropped for lack of data in Compustat; see table 7 for a list of those sectors.

Sector (4-sector classification) Share of value added (2001) Sector (12-sector classification) Share of value added (2001) Subsectors Share of value added (2001) BEA sector code KLEMS/BLS sector code Underlying NAICS 2D/3D sectors in Compustat Other 0.456 Other (mostly services) 0.169 Construction, real estate, and leasing 0.137 Miscellaneous Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Administrative and Support Services 0.061 5412 5412-5414,5416-5419 5412 to 5414 and 5416 to 5419 0.038 5610 561 561 Other services except Government 0.027 8100 81 81 Food Services and Drinking Places 0.022 7220 722 722 Accommodation 0.010 7210 721 721 Amusements, Gambling, and Recreation Industries Waste Management and Remediation Services 0.005 7130 713 713 0.004 5620 562 562 Educational Services 0.003 6100 61 61 Construction 0.070 2300 23 23 Real Estate 0.046 5310 531 531 Rental and Leasing Services and Lessors of Intangible Assets 0.021 5320 532,533 532 to 533 Finance and insurance 0.113 Federal Reserve Banks, Credit Intermediation, and Related Activities Insurance Carriers and Related Activities Securities, Commodity Contracts, and Investments 0.051 5210 and 5220 521,522 521 to 522 0.036 5240 524 524 0.026 5230 523 523 Transportation and Warehousing 0.036 Truck Transportation 0.014 4840 484 484 Other Transportation and Support Activities 0.010 487S 487,488,492 487 to 488 Air Transportation 0.005 4810 481 481 Rail Transportation 0.003 4820 482 482 Pipeline Transportation 0.002 4860 486 486 Water Transportation 0.001 4830 483 483 Table 6: Industry classification (continued). We aggregate the NAICS 2 and 3-digit classification in order to be use both the BEA fixed asset tables for measuring the intangible capital stock, and the KLEMS/BLS data for measuring markups and productivity. Some BEA and KLEMS sectors are dropped for lack of data in Compustat; see table 7 for a list of those sectors.

BEA name BEA code KLEMS/BLS code KLEMS/BLS name Underlying NAICS 2D/3D sectors Reason for exclusion Forestry, fishing, and related activities Transit and ground passenger transportation 113F 113-115 Forestry, Fishing, and Related Activities 4850 485 Transit and Ground Passenger Transportation 113 to 115 Not enough Compustat observations 485 Not enough Compustat observations Warehousing and storage 4930 493 Warehousing and Storage 493 Not enough Compustat observations Funds, trusts, and other financial vehicles 5250 525 Funds, Trusts, and Other Financial Vehicles 525 Most Compustat observations have no ppegt; most non-firm entities (REITS, etc). Legal services 5411 5411 Legal Services 5411 Not enough Compustat observations Management of companies and enterprises 5500 55 Management of Companies and Enterprises 55 Not enough Compustat observations Social assistance 6240 624 Social Assistance 624 Not enough Compustat observations Performing arts, spectator sports, museums, and related activities 711A 711,712 Performing Arts, Spectator Sports, Museums, and Related Activities 711 to 712 Not enough Compustat observations Table 7: BEA and BLS industries excluded from the analysis.