pm»i»i fh <m L'* f * u 1g I05n II I t \ MICHAEL N. FEUER CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE:

Similar documents
s!' X % L, II II I ii 9^11^%^ ,, rvg « ~ ;j '"xj MICHAEL N. FEUER CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE:

Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney

CARMEN A. TRUT ANICH City Attorney REPORTRE:

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO REPORT RE:

RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, the City Attorney has presented the following ballot title and question for the proposed general obligation bond proposition:

Mil. jl U««1Z_ [ yv!xlg* H lt-a.\* 11. *. ^ d ' f. II II B i I. «*«* If ^ r~i i <i m I I Q bf?>5. '. t u MICHAEL N. FEUER CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE:

Los Angeles County Democratic Party Ballot Measures Committee 2017 Spring Elections March 7, 2017

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney REPORT RE:

CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT. Agenda No. Key Words: Marijuana Tax Meeting Date: April 26, 2016 PREPARED BY: Douglas L. White, City Attorney

RESOLUTION NO

GILBERT ORTIZ PUEBLO COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER 720 N. MAIN STREET, SUITE 200 PUEBLO, CO GENERAL ELECTION

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA. ivt

October 17, RE: Your Request for Formal Advice Dated October 8, 2003 QUESTION

NOTICE AND CALL OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE KERMAN CITY COUNCIL. The sole business to be conducted is as follows:

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Ballot Measure F2018. To establish a reasonable tax on the operation of an allowed cannabis business within the City. What is it?

July 13, 2018 LOCAL BALLOT INITIATIVES / REQUIREMENTS

ANTELOPE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MEASURE R GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS PERFORMANCE AUDIT June 30, 2016

AMENDED IN COMMITTEE 5/17/18

Cannabis Regs City of San Luis Obispo

JlH. fli^. fri. tfe. ! i I rati Inti. fife c. SS oe:d MICHAEL N. FEUER CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE:

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

PROPOSITION M (Adopted by the Voters of Los Angeles at the Election on March 7, 2017)

Sierra County Board of Supervisors Agenda Transmittal & Record of Proceedings

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Report to the City Council

RESOLUTION NO. RES

A City Manager's Guide to the Tax Measure Galaxy

City Council Agenda Item

CITY OF HEALDSBURG RESOLUTION NO

ANTELOPE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Lancaster, California MEASURE R GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS PERFORMANCE AUDIT June 30, 2015

SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA, PERSONNEL AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE. Wednesday, April 19, 2017

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS STAFF REPORT

GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 2, 2010

TRANSMITTAL IM'tE 09/30/16

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

The Honorable City Council of the City of Los Angeles Page 2

Sierra County Board of Supervisors Agenda Transmittal & Record of Proceedings

MICHAEL N. FEUER CITY ATTORNEY

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Subdivision 4 of Subsection C of Section 9 of the Los Angeles Sports

Eff.: 7/17/2018 Subject to Voter Approval ORDINANCE NO. 18-3,904

10.1. Placerville, a unique historical past forging into a golden future.

The Tax Fairness, Transparency and Accountability Act

TRANSMITTAL

ORDINANCE NO. A new City of Merced Municipal Code Chapter 3.52 is hereby adopted to read:

WILSHIRE MIRACLE MILE SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT - W.O. E (ANNUAL ASSESSMENT CONFIRMATION)

Council Agenda Report

Village of Spring Grove

SPECIAL BULLETIN. LOS ANGELES CITY ETHICS COMMISSION 200 North Spring Street, Suite 2410 Los Angeles CA (213) ethics.lacity.

CALIFORNIA DAVID H.J. AMBROZ PRESIDENT (213) RENEE DAKE WILSON VICE-PRESIDENT. iiiii : ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

Jun CITY OF LOS ANGELES

CITY OF PACIFICA COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 6/26/2017

ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE NO. 24. Issue Date: May 30, 2018

Legislation Passed July 14, 2015

An ordinance amending Articles 13.5 and 13.6 to Chapter 5 of Division 5 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code.

Exhibit A to Resolution ORDINANCE 1527 AN ORDINANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 3 (REVENUE AND FINANCE) OF

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

URBAN AGRICULTURE INCENTIVE ZONES CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND

General Fund Revenue Overview

Item 5 Action. Proposed Stipulation

CALIFORNIA ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR. May 14,2014

BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE

SE A T T L E T R A NSPO R T A T I O N B E N E F I T DIST RI C T R ESO L U T I O N 5

Impartial Analysis of City Attorney Regarding Measure

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Joint Labor-Management Benefits Committee COMMITTEE REPORT 18-07

City of Carson 701 E. Carson St., Carson, CA Telephone: (310) ; ci.carson.ca.us

City of. Carmelita Flagpole, circa 1927

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT. DEPARTMENT: City Manager s Office MEETING DATE: December 19, 2017

employee relations BULLETIN Revised October 2, 2009 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE PROPOSED EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM (ERIP)

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. ## N.S.

Mammoth Lakes Town Council Agenda Action Sheet Agenda Item # 1 ~ FileNo 0 SO Council Meeting Date: April 1, 2015 Date Prepared: March 23, 2015 Prepare

City of San Leandro Page 1

Proposition 64 Regulation Under the Adult Use of Marijuana Act. Thursday, April 6, 2017

CITY OF LOS ANGELES REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS RISK MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT SERVICES

City of Stockton Page 1

Ticket Distribution & Disclosure Policy

City Administrative Officer. Los Angeles Zoo ALTERNATIVE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

January 25, 2016 M E M O R A N D U M MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL BRETT ESTES, CITY MANAGER LOCAL OPTION TAX - MARIJUANA RETAILERS DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS

LOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION REPORT

STAFF REPORT Fiscal Year Retirement Tax Rate SUMMARY

CITY ATTORNEY S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE A

COUNTY COUNSEL S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE B1 ANALYSIS BY THE COUNTY COUNSEL OF AN ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SPECIAL PARCEL TAX MEASURE

Resolution concurring with the Controller's certification that services previously

APPROVAL TO EXECUTE SECOND AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FOR FINANCIAL CUSTODIAN AND SECURITIES LENDING SERVICES

SOME THOUGHTS ON PROPOSITIONS 62 AND Does Proposition 62 affect a charter municipality s local taxing powers?

Ballot Measures-W Section

Measure K Performance Audit: The City Exceeded Required Funding for Children and Youth Services. May 29, 2008

BALLOT MEASURE FULL TEXT

contributor guide city elections

Budget Year A Guide to San Francisco's Budget Process

Deferred Compensation Plan BOARD REPORT 16-03

Proposition A: San Diego County Regional Fire Protection Ballot Measure

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of Pasadena is 132 years old and has aging infrastructure

Transcription:

T pm»i»i fh <m 1g I05n m L'* f * u '1 II I * fa SSs II 1 ' *] II I t Ml raj \ 111 i lffifli& 'W fl mj 1 r a jmt n -/ 1C5 X \ \ MICHAEL N. FEUER CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: REPORT NO. R 18-0 2 0 1 JUN 1 5 2018 BALLOT RESOLUTIONS REGARDING PROPOSED SPECIAL TAX PROPOSITION ON VARIOUS CANNABIS-RELATED ACTIVITIES, AND ORDINANCE CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION FOR THE PROPOSITION ON NOVEMBER 6, 2018 The Honorable City Council of the City of Los Angeles Room 395, City Hall 200 North Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Honorable Members: On June 5, 2018, your Honorable Body requested this Office to prepare the documents necessary for a proposed ballot measure imposing special taxes and surcharges on various cannabis-related activities. This Office hereby transmits approved as to form and legality, the enclosed ballot resolutions and election ordinance necessary to place a special tax proposition on the ballot for the November 6, 2018 State General Election. This special tax requires two-thirds voter approval to become effective. Background On March 7, 2017, the voters adopted Proposition M, an ordinance placed on the ballot by the City Council to enact a comprehensive regulatory, enforcement and taxation system for cannabis-related activity in the City of Los Angeles. The tax provisions of Proposition M included a new gross receipts tax regime of various rates on those who engage in the commercialization of medical and nonmedical cannabis. The taxes authorized in Proposition M were general taxes; proceeds from general taxes are placed in the General Fund and used to fund general municipal purposes throughout the City. City Hall East 200 N. Main Street Room 800 Los Angeles, CA 90012 (213) 978-8100 Fax (213) 978-8312

The Honorable City Council Page 2 On May 23, 2018, the Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee (REIR Committee) adopted a set of recommendations for a ballot proposition authorizing additional special taxes on various cannabis related activities to fund specific programs and projects. The REIR Committee also recommended a temporary reduction in many of the general gross receipts taxes authorized under Proposition M to go into effect only if the new special taxes were approved by the voters. On June 5, 2018, the City Council discussed the matter and adopted an amended set of recommendations for the special tax proposition (Recommendations), as well as a temporary reduction in Proposition M s general taxes should the new special tax proposition pass. The Recommendations proposed four new taxes and surcharges: 1) a 1 % special gross receipts tax on all commercial cannabis activity; 2) a 1% special gross receipts tax on licensed cannabis event organizers and registered cannabis management companies; 3) a $5 special surcharge on any test of cannabis products by a licensed commercial cannabis testing laboratory; and 4) a $5 special surcharge on any ticket sold for a temporary cannabis event. The Recommendations also specified the purposes for which the proceeds from each of these new taxes must be allocated and spent. These purposes, further detailed below, include: public improvements, child and youth programs and City parks, libraries and recreation centers near licensed cannabis businesses; public education and outreach, equity programs, expungement clinics, illegal enforcement and other cannabis-related programming; cannabis youth prevention and child strengthening programs, including youth/child development activities for ages 0 to 24; and science technology, math and engineering (STEM) education programs. The Recommendations also include other related spending restrictions and procedural requirements. The Recommendations requested our Office to consult with the Department of Cannabis Regulations (DCR), City Administrative Officer (CAO), Office of Finance and the Chair of the REIR Committee to draft and finalize the language for the special tax proposition. The enclosed draft ballot resolutions and election ordinance for the special tax proposition are a result of those consultations. Summary of the Special Tax Proposition The special tax proposition would amend the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) to authorize four new taxes on various cannabis related activity in the City. The proposition also would amend the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) to create a new Cannabis Reinvestment Trust Fund (CRTF) into which the proceeds from the special taxes are deposited and to specify the purposes for which the tax proceeds may be allocated and used. These new taxes would be in addition to the general gross receipts taxes of Proposition M. The new taxes and their special purposes, as well as other elements of the proposition, are summarized here.

Page 3 1. 1% Special Gross Receipts Tax on Commercial Cannabis Activity The special tax proposition would authorize a business tax of $10 for each $1,000 of gross receipts from all commercial cannabis activity in the City ( Special Cannabis Gross Receipts Tax ). This new 1% gross receipts tax would apply to every person already subject to the general gross receipts taxes of Proposition M - i.e., every person with a license that is engaged in the business of selling, transporting, testing, researching, manufacturing or cultivating, or otherwise commercializing cannabis and/or cannabis products and every person with a license that is engaged in the business of selling medical cannabis. (See proposed new LAMC Sections 21.51.1 & 21.52.1.) Proceeds from this Special Cannabis Gross Receipts Tax would be allocated for three different sets of purposes. First, 50% of the proceeds would be allocated to each City Council District in proportion to the number of licensed cannabis businesses within each District and dedicated for the following purposes: public improvements within a one-mile radius of any licensed cannabis business; child or youth programs, which include youth or child development activities for those between the ages of 0 and 24, conducted within a one-mile radius of any licensed cannabis business; and public improvements and programs at the City park, library or recreation center closest to a licensed cannabis business. Neighborhood Councils would be afforded the opportunity to submit recommendations to the Council regarding use of these funds. The one-mile proximity requirement would not apply to funds unused after five years. (See proposed new LAAC Section 5.589.) Second, 25% of the proceeds from the Special Cannabis Gross Receipts Tax would be dedicated for the following purposes: public education and outreach related to licensing and regulation of commercial cannabis activity in the City; public education and outreach related to the DCR s social equity program; organizing and conducting expungement clinics for individuals eligible to have cannabis-related convictions dismissed and sealed pursuant to state law; enforcement actions against unlicensed commercial cannabis activity; and other cannabis-related programs. (See proposed new LAAC Section 5.590.) Third, 25% of the proceeds from the Special Cannabis Gross Receipts Tax would be dedicated for cannabis youth prevention and child strengthening programs, which include youth or child development activities for those between the ages of 0 and 24 The administration of the programs, including guidelines and procedures, shall be established later by ordinance. (See proposed new LAAC Section 5.591(a).)

Page 4 2. 1% Special Gross Receipts Tax on Cannabis Event Organizers and Management Companies The special tax proposition would authorize a business tax of $10 for each $1,000 of gross receipts from every licensed cannabis event organizer and registered cannabis management company ( Special Cannabis Event Organizer and Management Company Tax ). This new 1% gross receipts tax applies to every person who holds a license pursuant to the City s cannabis regulations to organize temporary cannabis events in the City and to every person required to register as a management company with the DCR under the City s cannabis regulations. (See proposed new LAMC Section 21.51.2.) Proceeds from the Special Cannabis Event Organizer and Management Company Tax would be dedicated for the following purposes: public education and outreach related to licensing and regulation of commercial cannabis activity in the City; public education and outreach related to the DCR s social equity program; organizing and conducting expungement clinics for individuals eligible to have cannabis-related convictions dismissed and sealed pursuant to state law; enforcement actions against unlicensed commercial cannabis activity; and other cannabis-related programs. (See proposed new LAAC Section 5.590.) 3. $5 Surcharge on Tests of Cannabis Products The special tax proposition would authorize a $5 surcharge on each certificate issued by a testing laboratory for the testing of cannabis and/or cannabis products ( Special Cannabis Testing Tax ). (See proposed new LAMC Sections 21.18.1 through 21.18.12.) This surcharge amounts to a special tax under the State Constitution s taxing provisions. (See Cal. Const., Art XIII C.) Proceeds from the Special Cannabis Testing Tax would be dedicated for science, technology, engineering and math education programs in the City. The administration of the programs, including guidelines and procedures, shall be established later by ordinance. (See proposed new LAAC Section 5.591(b).) 4. $5 Surcharge on Tickets Sold to Temporary Cannabis Events The special tax proposition would authorize a $5 surcharge on each ticket sold for a temporary cannabis event ( Special Cannabis Event Admission Tax ). Temporary cannabis events are defined to include events held on premises within the City of Los Angeles at which cannabis and/or cannabis products are sold and/or consumed under a temporary cannabis event license granted pursuant to the City s cannabis regulations. (See proposed new LAMC Sections 21.19.1 through 21.19.12.) This surcharge amounts to a special tax under the State Constitution s taxing provisions. (See Cal. Const., Art XIII C.)

Page 5 Proceeds from the Special Cannabis Event Admission Tax would be dedicated for the following purposes: public education and outreach related to licensing and regulation of commercial cannabis activity in the City; public education and outreach related to the DCR s social equity program; organizing and conducting expungement clinics for individuals eligible to have cannabis-related convictions dismissed and sealed pursuant to state law; enforcement actions against unlicensed commercial cannabis activity; and other cannabis-related programs. (See proposed new LAAC Section 5.590.) 5. Other Provisions The special tax proposition also includes several other requirements and restrictions. The proposition provides that tax proceeds would be deposited in the CRTF and appropriations from that Fund shall be made by the City Council and Mayor for the purposes authorized in the proposition. (See proposed new LAAC Section 5.588(b).) The proposition includes a maintenance of effort clause stating that tax proceeds shall not be used to supplant funding from existing sources currently allocated by the City for the purposes set forth in the proposition. (See proposed new LAAC Section 5.588(d).) The proposition also provides that tax proceeds may not be used to process applications for licenses of commercial cannabis activity, or to monitor a licensee s compliance with City law or enforce against a licensee for violating City law. (See proposed new LAAC Section 5.590(d).) The proposition requires licensed businesses to submit a cannabis corporate responsibility report annually to the DCR describing its community engagement, corporate philanthropy, neighborhood relations, and legal compliance efforts. (See proposed new LAMC Section 104.21.) Finally, in response to your request for an ordinance to temporarily reduce Proposition M s general taxes if the voters adopt these new special taxes, we are transmitting a separate ordinance that would reduce those general taxes as requested. That ordinance reducing tax rates does not require voter approval. Rule 38 Referral Pursuant to Council Rule 38, and consistent with the directions in Council s Motion, the provisions of the proposed tax proposition were sent to the DCR, CAO, and Office of Finance. This Office has worked with staff of these offices, and their input has been incorporated. Election Requirements The proposition authorizes special taxes and therefore must be approved by twothirds of the voters of the City in order to become effective. (See Cal. Const., Art XIII C, Section 2(d).) The Constitution s voter-approval requirement applies to any attempt to

Page 6 impose, increase or extend a new tax or change the purposes for which the tax is levied. The Council may make other amendments to the proposition by ordinance without a vote of the electorate, and the proposition contains an amendment clause to that effect. The ballot resolutions and election ordinance include a ballot title and question for the special tax proposition. The ballot title must comply with City and State law regarding its form, content, length, and impartiality. Please note that the ballot title and question must include an estimate of the annual revenues expected from the new taxes. We have left that figure blank in this draft, as we are awaiting information from other City departments regarding that estimate. City Election Code Section 601 requires that final resolutions and ordinances to place a measure on the ballot be adopted no less than 110 days before the election. With regard to the November 6, 2018, State General Election, and in light of Council s upcoming recess, the last date for Council to take action to place a measure on the ballot is July 2, 2018. The State General Election is conducted locally by the County Registrar- Recorder. In order to place a City measure on the State General Election ballot, the City must request the County Board of Supervisors to approve consolidation of the City s ballot measure election with the State General Election. The Board of Supervisors has the limited discretion to deny the City s consolidation request if the County s voting equipment or other election capacities are such that the County cannot handle the City s election. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Deputy City Attorney HaritTrivedi at (213) 978-7193. A member of this Office will be present when you consider this matter to answer questions you may have. Sincerely, MICHAEL N. FEUER, City Attorney By DAVID MICHAELSON Chief Assistant City Attorney DM:HT:cl Transmittals m:\government counsel\2018 cannabis reinvestment acttcannabis reinvestment act - transmittal report final 6.15.18.doc