The 2014 U.S. Farm Bill: DDA Implications of Increased Countercyclical Support and Reliance on Insurance

Similar documents
The Potential Budgetary Costs and WTO Implications of the New Farm Bill. Joseph Glauber and Pat Westhoff

Farm Policy: 2012 and Beyond

2014 Farm Bill Overview

Commodity Programs in 2014 Farm Bill. Key Provisions

Assessing the Political Economy of the 2014 U.S. Farm Bill. Carl Zulauf and David Orden

The Political Economy of the 2014 Farm Bill. David Orden and Carl Zulauf*

Agricultural Risk Coverage County (ARC CO) vs. Price Loss Coverage (PLC)

Current Crop Insurance and Federal Policy Situation

NGFA Country Elevator Conference St. Louis, Missouri Dec. 9, 2013

2014 Farm Bill How does it affect you and your operation? Section 1: Overview, Base Reallocation, and Yield Updates

Archie Flanders University of Arkansas Northeast Research and Extension Center Keiser, AR. The Farm Bill Decision Making Process

Farm Bill Details and Decisions for 2014

POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE 2014 FARMBILL

2014 Farm Bill Provisions and WTO Compliance

Farm Safety Net Provisions in a 2013 Farm Bill: S. 954 and H.R. 2642

Pat Westhoff FAPRI-MU, University of Missouri

Farm Safety Net. Dr. Alejandro Plastina Assistant Professor, Economics

AGEC 429: AGRICULTURAL POLICY LECTURE 19: ANALYSIS OF THE 2014 FARM BILL I

How Will the Farm Bill s Supplemental Revenue Programs Affect Crop Insurance?

Farm Bill Details and Decisions

Farm Bill Details and Decisions

Farm Bill and Texas A&M Computer Training. Nebraska Innovation Campus Conference Center January 14, 2015

Presentation Outline

The US Agricultural Act of 2014

FARM PROGRAM DECISION TOOL

The 2018 Farm Bill: Overview & Outlook

Farm Bill Details and Decisions

Maryland Crop Insurance Workshop

The Agriculture Risk Coverage (ARC) Program of the 2014 Farm Bill

2014 Farm Bill How does it affect you and your operation? Section II: PLC, SCO, ARC-C, and ARC-I

Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

Risk Management Agency

Title: The Economic Welfare Impacts of the new Agricultural Insurance and Shallow Loss Programs

The 2018 Farm Bill. Dr. Alejandro Plastina Assistant Professor, Economics

Can U.S. Agriculture Survive in the World of Uncertainty? Flynn Adcock Texas A&M AgriLife Research

Analysis of House and Senate Farm Bills: Implications for Arkansas Producers

Seed Cotton Informational Meeting. Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)

EXAMPLE OF PLC, PLC WITH SCO, AND ARC-CO

11/14/2011. Bradley D. Lubben, Ph.D. Special thanks to: Federal Budget. Economy Farm & General Economy. Politics. Super Committee (more politics)

2002 FSRIA. Farm Security & Rural Investment Act. (2002 Farm Bill) How much money is spent with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)?

2014 Farm Bill Update. International Crop Expo February 19, 2015

Working Party on Agricultural Policies and Markets

2014 Actual Average County Yield. times. higher of: Month Market Year Average Price or National Loan Rate 86% times

Farm Bill Meeting Stoddard County

Risk Management Agency

PROGRAM DECISION STEPS FARM BILL TOOLBOX. Gary Schnitkey, Jonathan Coppess, Nick Paulson University of Illinois

Farm Bill Principles and Commodity Program Proposals: A View from the House

Looking Out for the 2012 Farm Bill

ARC vs. PLC Enrollment Decisions

Aligning U.S. Farm Policy With World Trade Commitments Farm income support and trade programs

2014 Farm Bill. Jay Yates Extension Program Specialist III Risk Management

Agricultural Act of 2014

CRS Report for Congress

2014 FARM BILL COMMODITY PROGRAMS AND DECISION TOOLS

Farm Bill Meeting Scott County

PLC OR ARC? FARM BILL PROGRAM SIGN-UP AND DECISION AIDS

PROCRASTINATOR'S FARM BILL UPDATE. Paul Goeringer, Extension Legal Specialist, Women in Ag Wednesday Webinar March 11, 2015

U.S. Farm Policy and the World Trade Organization: How Do They Match Up?

2008 FARM BILL: FOCUS ON ACRE

Crop Insurance for Milk? Dairy-Revenue Protection

Estimating the Costs of MPCI Under the 1994 Crop Insurance Reform Act

Todd D. Davis John D. Anderson Robert E. Young. Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association s

THE FARM BILL AND THE WESTERN HAY INDUSTRY. Western States Alfalfa and Forage Symposium November 29, 2017 Reno, Nevada

Farm Bill Meeting Bollinger County

Farm Bill Meeting Cape County

Ohio Agriculture Risk Coverage and Price Loss Coverage Payments for Program Year 2016 Prepared by Ben Brown and Chris Bruynis

2018 Farm Bill Economic Principles and Policy Challenges

The Economics of ARC vs. PLC

FARM BILL UPDATE WHAT CAN WISCONSIN EXPECT?

How Much Safety Is Available under the U.S. Proposal to the WTO?

Harry de Gorter Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University

Construction of a Green Box Countercyclical Program

Ohio Agriculture Risk Coverage and Price Loss Coverage Payments for Program Year 2016 Prepared by Ben Brown

Estimated ARC and PLC Payments for 2016 Covered Commodities

All Approved Insurance Providers All Risk Management Agency Field Offices All Other Interested Parties

Discussion: What Have We Learned from the New Suite of Risk Management Programs of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008?

Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA); Market Facilitation Program (MFP) AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation and Farm Service Agency, USDA.

Allan Gray and Luc Valentin. Purdue University

Common Crop Insurance Policy & Area Risk Protection Insurance 1

Economic Conditions & the Title 1 Programs

Q1. Do you wish for your answers to be entered into the AAEA Extension Forecasting competition? Yes No

Loan Deficiency Payments versus Countercyclical Payments: Do We Need Both for a Price Safety Net?

A VEIW FROM THE SOUTH

WTO Commitments and Support to Agriculture: Experience from Canada

Steven D. Johnson. What s Different in Crop Insurance?

The Agricultural Act of 2014: Update on STAX, SCO & Farm Bill Implementation. Mid-South Region December 2014

NAAFP Farm Bill Decision Aid Insurance Tool

Farm Safety Net Programs: Issues for the Next Farm Bill

Valuing Counter-Cyclical Payments

Gardner Farm Income and Policy Simulator. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Gardner Agricultural Policy Program

The Farm Safety Net: The Good and Not So Good Michael Boehlje and Michael Langemeier Center for Commercial Agriculture Purdue University

Farm Bill 2014 Agricultural Act of What You Need To Know Doug Yoder, IFB

Counter-Cyclical Farm Safety Nets

12/14/2009. Goals Today. Introduction. Crop Insurance, the SURE Disaster Assistance Program, and Farm Risk Management

Farm Level Impacts of a Revenue Based Policy in the 2007 Farm Bill

Farm Safety Net Programs: Background and Issues

The Agricultural Act of 2014: Update on STAX, SCO & Farm Bill Implementation. Southeast Region December 2014

2015 COTTON MARKET OUTLOOK AND RISK MANAGEMENT DECISIONS

RISK MANAGEMENT AND THE NEW 2014 FARM BILL

CRAEA WORKING PAPER SERIES. Does Size Matter? Distribution of Crop Insurance Subsidies and Government Program Payments Across U.S.

Transcription:

IFPRI The 2014 U.S. Farm Bill: DDA Implications of Increased Countercyclical Support and Reliance on Insurance David Orden Presented at the EC DG Trade Workshop US farm policy and its implications on the WTO-DDA negotiations, April 13, 2015 (Based on joint work with Carl Zulauf presented at the AAEA invited paper session The 2014 Farm Bill: An Economic Post Mortem, ASSA Annual Meetings, Boston, MA, January 4, 2015) INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE

The 2014 Farm Bill Introduction A long, contentious debate resulted ultimately in The Agricultural Act of 2014 signed into law February 7. Three years of deliberations was framed by Recessionary macroeconomic conditions and partisan contestation over entitlements and fiscal policy High but volatile farm yields, prices and revenue during 2008-2013 Divergent views among of farm groups on what they sought in strengthened downside risk protection Two main objectives of this presentation are A brief synopsis of the bill s major agricultural support provisions Assessment of their fit within existing and proposed WTO domestic support commitments

Shift Back to Countercyclical Policy in 2014 The farm safety net that emerged in the 2014 farm bill is complex (a plethora of support program choices for farmers), but can be abstracted to a few basic points Eliminated fixed direct payments of about $4.5 billion annually Enhances protection against low prices or declining revenue Debate centered on farmers calls for protection against shallow losses and strengthened protection against multiple years of low prices or revenue Countercyclical commodity programs and subsidized, withinyear insurance entrenched as complementary/competing pillars of support. Costs less certain than with fixed direct payments Permanent farm bill legislation retained

Multi -Year Losses Price Loss Coverage (PLC) [modified CCP] Fixed References Prices substantially higher than in 2008 farm bill (e.g. for corn $3.70/bu vs. $2.63/bu, 41% increase) Applies to fixed acreage base and fixed program yield, regardless of crop grown (updating options allowed) Covers difference of Reference Price and market price or Loan Rate Loan rates not raised from levels below 2009-13 market prices Agriculture Risk Coverage (ARC) [modified ACRE] Revenue benchmark calculated from 5-year Olympic averages of national crop year prices and county yields (ARC-CO), or farm yields with payment acreage penalty (ARC-IC) Revenue benchmark generally moves over time, subject to PLC reference price as minimum price entering ARC s price component Applies to fixed acreage base Covers revenue decline only from 14% to 24% of benchmark

Multi -Year Losses ARC vs. PLC raises a policy design issue of whether downside risk protection is capped at a lower value in exchange for assistance for declining prices or revenue from higher levels Related to this are whether the focus should be price or revenue and whether policy parameters should be fixed or move with the market Farmers chose between these two program by April 7, 2015 for the duration of the farm bill (2014-2018 crop years) For corn base acres in particular, farmers had to decide whether they prefer ARC support expected to make large payments for crop year 2014 and possibly 2015, or support retained under PLC for low prices that may or may not materialize in subsequent years

Potential per Acre Costs (Based on December 2014 WASDE Yield and Price Estimates) $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 $3 $5 $67 $56 $0 $0 $58 Low Price $182 $2 $0 $22 $31 $21 $0 $11 $0 WASDE Projections and Policy Prices ($/bu, except rice $/cwt) $102 Barley Corn Oats Peanuts Long grain rice ARC-CO PLC $0 Medium grain rice Sorghum Soybeans Wheat Crop WASDE low price PLC reference Price ARC price component (2014 crop year) Barley $4.85 $4.95 $5.45 Corn $3.20 $3.70 $5.28 Oats $3.05 $2.40 $3.25 Long-grain rice $12.00 $14.00 $14.17 Medium-/short-grain rice $18.50 $14.00 $17.87 Sorghum $3.20 $3.95 $5.09 Soybeans $9.00 $8.40 $12.27 Wheat $5.80 $5.50 $6.60

Potential per Acre Costs (Based on December 2014 WASDE Yield and Price Estimates) $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 $200 High Price $68 $51 $30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6 $0 $0 $0 $0 Mid-Price $125 $67 $76 $22 $12$19 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5 $0 Low Price $182 Crop WASDE Price Projections ($/bu, except rice $/cwt) Low price Middle price High price Barley $4.85 $5.15 $5.45 Corn $3.20 $3.50 $3.80 Oats $3.05 $3.25 $3.45 Long-grain rice $12.00 $12.50 $13.00 Medium-/shortgrain rice $18.50 $19.00 $19.50 $150 $100 $50 $0 $3 $5 $67 $56 $0 $0 $58 $102 $2 $0 $0 $22 $31 $21 $11 $0 $0 Sorghum $3.20 $3.50 $3.80 Soybeans $9.00 $10.00 $11.00 Wheat $5.80 $6.00 $6.20 ARC-CO PLC

Potential Program Costs (million dollars) (December 2014 WASDE Estimates and Other Assumptions) Crop Year Low Price Middle Price High Price ARC / PLC Only PLC ARC / PLC Only PLC ARC / PLC Only PLC 2014 7,530 / 1,041 8,571 5,734 6,050 / 680 6,730 2,557 2,551 / 361 2,912 361 Note: Program cost indicators assume either all program acres are enrolled in the program that would pay the most for crop year 2014 (ARC / PLC column) or all acres are enrolled in PLC (only PLC column)

Potential Program Costs (million dollars) (December 2014 WASDE Estimates and Other Assumptions) Crop Year Low Price Middle Price High Price ARC / PLC Only PLC ARC / PLC Only PLC ARC / PLC Only PLC 2014 7,530 / 1,041 5,734 6,050 / 680 2,557 2,551 / 361 361 2015 7,511 / 1,041 5,734 6,170 / 680 2,557 2,551 / 361 361 2016 5,972 / 1,041 5,734 3,572 / 680 2,557 234 / 361 361 2017 1,270 / 1,041 5,734 0 / 680 2,557 0 / 361 361 2018 0 / 1,041 5,734 0 / 680 2,557 0 / 361 361 Total Combined Total 22,283 / 5,205 27,488 28,670 15,792 / 3,400 19,192 12,785 5,336 / 1,805 7,141 1,805 Notes: Program cost indicators assume either all program acres are enrolled in the program that would pay the most for crop year 2014 (ARC / PLC column) or all acres are enrolled in PLC (only PLC column)

Insurance Pillar Crop Insurance Net Indemnities, Billion dollars 2014 Farm Bill Strengthens and expands existing crop insurance programs Crop revenue-cost margin insurance programs authorized Cotton program redesigned into insurance For shallow losses a policy design issue is whether downside risk protection should be delivered by insurance or commodity programs

Shallow Losses Agriculture Risk Coverage (ARC) [commodity program] Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO) [insurance program] Complements individual farm yield or revenue insurance Covers losses (at county level) from 14% to underlying individual farm level of insurance deductible Applies to current production 65% subsidy of actuarially fair premium Acreage enrolled in ARC not eligible for SCO

Cotton, Dairy and Sugar Significant change in upland cotton program design Unique outcome: Direct and countercyclical payments eliminated and replaced by the Stacked Income Protection Plan (STAX), a county-based revenue insurance program; Individual cotton farm crop insurance program continues Driven in part by WTO Brazil-U.S. Cotton Case; high insurance net indemnities compared to direct payments made it easier for cotton industry to adopt insurance option Termination of WTO dispute a success of 2014 farm bill Policy design issues raised include: creation of generic base acres with payments coupled to crop grown; Balkanization of crop insurance; will lack of multi-year support (other than loan rate) prove viable Dairy margin protection (MPP) introduces revenue-cost risk coverage Sugar program unchanged

WTO Issues There is currently little WTO discipline on the 2014 farm bill Had agreement been reached along lines of tighter disciplines in the Dec. 6, 2008 Doha negotiating documents (Rev. 4), it is unlikely the U.S. would have adopted the 2014 farm bill as it is Enactment of 2014 farm bill makes it more difficult for the U.S. to contribute to attaining such limits on a global level in future negotiations Low prices would renew scrutiny in the WTO of U.S. programs With higher reference prices, PLC payments would be $30 billion if all crop prices fell to the loan rates and all acreage was enrolled in PLC Several considerations affect notifications and compliance Elimination of dairy Market Price Support under the 2014 farm bill Shift in 2012 U.S. domestic support notification to notifying crop insurance premium subsidies as product-specific support Expenditures under the 2104 farm bill

Agreement on Agriculture Compliance WTO Table 1. Summary of U.S. 2012 AMS Notifications, Actual and Hypothetical under 2014 Farm Bill (million dollars) Product-Specific Actual Notification Hypothetical Notification AMS CTAMS AMS CTAMS Dairy (MPS 2,923) 3,335 3,335 0 -- Sugar (MPS 1,405) 1,454 1,454 1,454 1,454 Other Products (mostly crop insurance) Corn 2,719 -- 2,719 -- Cotton 636 636 636+330= 966 966 Soybeans 1,479 -- 1,479 -- Rice 46 -- 46 -- Wheat 1,115 1,115 1,115 1,115 All other 1,041 323 1,041 323 Subtotal (other products) 7,036 2,074 7,366 2,404 TOTAL 11,825 6,863 8,820 3,858 Non-Product-Specific 300 -- 300 -- Threshold (5% de minimis) 19,830 19,830 Notes: -- indicates under de minimis threshold so not included in CTAMS indicates estimate (lower bound for dairy MPP; adds average CBO projected outlay for STAX to cotton notified AMS; crop year prices above reference prices and no ACRE payments so no PLC or ARC payments)

Doha Draft U.S. Commitments Final Bound OTDS $14.5 billion Subject to: Final Bound Total AMS $7.6 billion Total Blue Box Limit $4.8 billion De minimis 2.5% value of production thresholds Product-specific AMS and Blue Box caps and with: Change in criteria for Blue Box eligibility Modification of Green Box crop insurance criteria

Doha WTO Compatibility (AMS) WTO Table 2. Hypothetical U.S. 2012 AMS Notifications under 2014 Farm Bill and Doha 2008 Draft Commitments (million dollars) Product-Specific AMS Threshold (2.5% de minimis) Product-specific AMS Cap Dairy 0 930 4,781 -- CTAMS Sugar 1,454 92 1,126 1,454* Corn 2,719 1,858 1,106 2,719* Cotton 966 194 142 966 * Soybeans 1,479 1,094 1,124 1,479* Rice 46 76 314 -- Wheat 1,115 437 231 1,115* All other 1,041 various various 503 TOTAL 8,820 8,236** Non-Product-Specific 300 9,915 -- Notes: -- indicates under de minimis threshold so not included in CTAMS indicates estimate * exceeds draft Doha product-specific AMS cap ** exceeds draft Doha Final Bound Total AMS

Doha WTO Compatibility (Blue Box) WTO Table 3. ARC and/or PLC Expenditures under WASDE December 2014 Low Prices Compared to Doha 2008 Draft Blue Box Product-Specific Caps (Million dollars) Product Blue Box Cap ARC / PLC Only PLC Barley 32 / 40* 40* Corn 2,360 5,691* / 4,693* Oats 5 0 0 Peanuts 149 / 268* 268* Long grain rice 235 / 373* 373* Medium grain rice 0 0 Sorghum 107 / 360* 360* Soybeans 400 1,029* / 0 Wheat 1,041 810 / 0 TOTAL 4,329 7,530 / 1,041 8,571** 5,734** Notes: Program cost indicators assume either all program acres are enrolled in the program that would pay the most for crop year 2014 (ARC / PLC column) or all acres are enrolled in PLC (only PLC column) * exceeds draft Doha product-specific Blue Box cap ** exceeds draft Doha total Blue Box limit

A Feasible Way Forward? Proposal Convert current Final Bound Total AMS to a Final Bound OTDS and reduce 15% (US $19.1 to $16.2 billion) Set new Final Bound Total AMS at half of OTDS (US $8.1 billion) Reduce de minimis thresholds from 5% to 2.5% Convert current 5% de minimis thresholds to caps on product-specific and non-product-specific support Eliminate Blue Box

A Feasible Way Forward? Benefits Tightens existing limits and builds on but simplifies Doha Rev. 4 proposals Reduces space for non-green-box U.S. support to the Final Bound OTDS (reduction of more than 50% from existing Bound Total AMS + NPS de minimis + PS de minimis for products not in CTAMS + Blue Box) Limits ARC and PLC payments and requires they be unchallengable as non-product-specific support. This would close off expansion of generic acres recoupling to products Would constrain crop insurance premium subsidies as product-specific support

Selected References Selected information/analysis about Agricultural Act of 2014 Chite, R. M. (coordinator). 2014. The 2014 Farm Bill (P.L. 113-79): Summary and Side-by-Side Comparison, Congressional Research Service Report R43076, February. Glauber, J. and P. Westhoff. 2015. 50 Shades of Amber: The 2014 Farm Bill and the WTO, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, forthcoming. Orden, D. and C. Zulauf. 2015. Political Economy of the 2014 Farm Bill, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, forthcoming. U.S. Congress. 2014. Agricultural Act of 2014. February 7. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. USDA, ERS. Agricultural Act of 2014: Highlights and Implications Zulauf, C. and D. Orden. 2014. The US Agricultural Act of 2014: Overview and Analysis, IFPRI Discussion Paper 01393, December. Source for continuing information on policy and farmer decisions Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/