Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Similar documents
New Issue: Moody's upgrades Edgewater, NJ's GO to Aa2: assigns MIG 1 to $15.4M in BANs

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Township of Nutley, NJ

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Lubbock (City of), TX

Edison (Township of) NJ

Rockwall County, TX. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Above average socioeconomic indices. Credit Challenge

City of Oak Creek, WI

Columbia School District, MO

Cherokee County Board of Education, AL

Montgomery County, TX

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

Volusia County School District (FL)

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Hoover (City of), AL

Rating Update: Moody's affirms Aa3 on Waukegan Park District, IL's GO debt

City of Mesquite, TX

Huffman Independent School District, TX

Park District of La Grange, IL

Celina Independent School District, TX

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Framingham, MA's $43.9M GO bonds, MIG 1 to $4.4M GO BANs

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

Oakland (City of), CA

Masconomet Regional School District, MA

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Butler (Village of), WI

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

West Fargo Public School District No. 6, ND

Dallas County Community College District, TX

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

Findlay City School District, OH

Rio Rancho, NM. Credit Strengths. Sizeable and stable tax base. Healthy reserves. Manageable debt burden with rapid payout.

Findlay City School District, OH

St. Mary's County, MD

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Westport (Town of) CT

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Montgomery County, TX

City of Oakland, CA. Update to Credit Analysis. CREDIT OPINION 19 April Summary

WILTON (TOWN OF) CT. Update to credit analysis. Credit strengths. » Affluent residential tax base. Credit challenges

Newport News (City of) VA

Carroll (County of) MD

Cocoa (City of) FL. Update to credit analysis following assignment of Aa2 issuer rating. CREDIT OPINION 12 April Summary.

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Newport News, VA. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Strong financial management. Credit Challenges. Below average demographics

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Weber School District, UT

City of Las Cruces, NM

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Taos Municipal School District 1, NM

Port Jefferson Union Free School District, NY

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

Allen Independent School District, TX

Prince William County, VA

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 to Ford County USD No. 443's (KS) GOs Series 2015-A and Series 2015-B

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

Prince William County, VA

Jersey City Community Charter School, NJ

Bernalillo Municipal School District 1 (Sandoval County), NM

Bothell (City of) WA

Evanston (City of), IL

Wicomico County, MD. Credit Strengths. » Well-funded pension plan. Credit Challenges. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN

Moody s Upgrades Montco s Outlook

George W. Kuhn Drainage District (Oakland County), MI

Las Cruces School District 2, NM

City of Isle of Palms, SC

New Rochelle City School District, NY

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

US Local Government GO Debt Methodology

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

Duquesne University, PA

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa to Bronxville NY's $5.2M GO Bonds

Mongolian Banking System

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

Clovis Municipal School District 1 (Curry County), NM

Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund

Ci1r of' SACRAMENTO. O ffice of t he City Treasu rer. Russell Fehr~ City Treasurer ADDITIONAL (VOLUNTARY) DISCLOSURE RATING AFFIRMED

Moody s Muni Bond Rating Criteria & KS Local Government Trends

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Baa3 senior unsecured debt ratings of ICICI Bank's Bahrain branch Global Credit Research - 17 Aug 2017

Regional Economic Outlook

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa2 UND/Aa3 ENH to Roswell ISD (Chaves County), NM's GOULT bonds, Ser Sep 2018

Massachusetts (Commonwealth of)

Disruption in Higher Education: What Does It Mean For Credit Ratings

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades PGW (PA) to A3 from Baa1; Assigns A3 to $278.2 mil Gas Works Rev. Refunding Bds., 15th Series

Celina Independent School District, TX

ISSUER COMMENT 02 DECEMBER 2014

Concord Hospital, NH

Moody s Reaffirms Montco s Strong Financial Position

Policy for Analyst Rotation

Bexar County, TX. Exhibit 1 Assessed Valuation Gains Reflect Continued Economic Activity CLIENT SERVICES. Source: Bexar County, TX,

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aaa IFS rating of New York Life; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 27 Jul 2017

Rating Action: Moody's revises Denver Transit Partners, LLC rating outlook to negative; affirms Baa3 rating Global Credit Research - 03 Apr 2018

Policy on Conflict of Interest Certification

Rating Action: Moody's reviews NORD/LB Luxembourg S.A. - Public-Sector Covered Bonds, direction uncertain 19 Dec 2018

Transcription:

CREDIT OPINION New Issue Roselle Park Borough, NJ New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aa3 to Roselle Park, NJ's $4.9M GO Bonds, Series 2016 Summary Rating Rationale Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aa3 rating to Roselle Park, NJ's $4.9 million General Obligation Bonds, Series 2016. Concurrently, Moody's has affirmed the Aa3 on the borough's outstanding general obligation debt. Contacts Susanne Siebel 212-553-1809 Associate Analyst susanne.siebel@moodys.com Douglas Goldmacher 212-553-1477 Analyst douglas.goldmacher@moodys.com The Aa3 rating reflects the borough's moderately-sized tax base, below-average wealth levels, healthy reserve position, and modest debt burden. Credit Strengths Healthy reserve position and annually balanced operations Moderately-sized tax base Credit Challenges Below-average wealth indicators Elevated pension liability Rating Outlook Moody's typically does not usually assign outlooks to local government credits with this amount of debt outstanding. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade Material growth in the borough's tax base and wealth indicators Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade Decline in wealth indicators and tax base Decline in reserve levels Material growth in debt burden

Key Indicators Exhibit 1 Source: Moody's Investors Service Detailed Rating Considerations Economy and Tax Base: Moderately-Sized Tax Base The borough's tax base is expected to experience growth in its tax base in the near-term with planned redevelopment commercial and residential projects. Roselle Park's $1.1 billion tax base has experienced three years of annual growth after five years of material declines. Its five year compound annual rate of decline amounted to 2.4% despite a 5.7% year-over-year increase in 2015. The borough is anticipating a new development project in the coming years which is expected to add approximately 213 residential apartments targeted to young professionals. This complex is expected to be mixed-use adding new restaurants and store fronts to the area. Management estimates that the new development could add $50-60 million to its tax rolls once it is completed. The borough's wealth indicators are below state levels with median family income (MFI) amounting to 81.4% of the state but is above national levels at 109.4%. MFI within the borough has been on a slight downward trend as a percent of the state and nation, declining 16.1% and 13.7%, respectively, since 2000. Additionally, county-wide unemployment of 5.6% is above state (5.4%) and national (5.0%) levels. Financial Operations and Reserves: Stable and Healthy Operations The borough's financial operations are expected to remain balanced in the near term due to conversative revenue budgeting and expenditure controls. Roselle Park's Current Fund balance at the end of fiscal 2015 amounted to $2.3 million (14.3% of operating revenues) which is a six-year high. Moody's makes certain adjustments to New Jersey local governments' fund balance to include receivables and reserves that would be eligible to be included in fund balance under GAAP accounting but are excluded as a result of state statutory accounting regulations. The Moody's adjusted Current Fund balance in fiscal 2015 totaled $4.2 million or heathy 26.5% of revenues. The borough's revenues are primarily support by property tax collections comprising 79.0% of total revenues in fiscal 2015. The borough's tax collection rate history is very strong ranging between 97%-98.3% providing consistency in its funding stream. The borough's fiscal 2016 budget includes a $1.4 million fund balance appropriation which is in line with previous years. Management indicates that the borough is on track to regenerate the use of reserves. Total revenues are budgeted to increase 1.9% from the previous year mainly driven by a 3.0% increase in the property tax levy. While conservatively budgeted, the borough is anticipated to This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2

generate additional income from the new developments described above. The fiscal 2017 budget is still in progress but management does not anticipate material changes from previous years. LIQUIDITY The borough's cash position is expected to remain strong due to management's ability to maintain balanced operations. At the end of fiscal 2015, Roselle Park cash balance amounted to $3.9 million or a healthy 24.9% of revenues. Debt and Pensions: Average Debt Burden The borough's debt burden is expected to remain a current levels with no plans to issue additional debt in the near-term. Roselle Park's total debt burden including this issuance amounted to $17.2 million or an average 1.6% of full value. Debt service in fiscal 2015 accounted for $1.9 million or 12.4% of operating expenditures. Annual debt service has been on a growing trend over the past six years, increasing 77.1% from fiscal 2010's debt service of $1.1 million. DEBT STRUCTURE All of the borough's debt is fixed rate. DEBT-RELATED DERIVATIVES The borough is not party to any swap or derivative agreements. PENSIONS AND OPEB The borough contributes to two state administered defined-benefit, multiple-employer pension plans; the Police and Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS) and the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS). In fiscal 2015, the borough contributed a total of $989,000 to both plans which represents 6.3% of total operating expenditures. The borough's combined adjusted net pension liability (ANPL) for fiscal 2015, under Moody's methodology for adjusting reported pension data, was approximately $32.1 million or an elevated 2.04 times operating revenues. Moody's ANPL reflects certain adjustments we make to improve comparability of reported pension liabilities. The adjustments are not intended to replace the borough's reported liability information, but rather to improve comparability with other rated entities. The borough also contributes to the State Health Benefits Plan (SHBP) for post employment benefits. Total fixed costs, when considering debt and pension contributions, amount to 18.7% of operating expenditures. Management and Governance Management successfully utilizes conservative budgeting practices in order to maintain balanced operations. Additionally, management strictly avoids using one-time revenue sources to balance its operations. New Jersey cities have an institutional framework score of Aa, or strong. Revenues are moderately predictable and mostly consist of property taxes; however, cities are required to make county and school district tax levies whole in the event of tax appeals. Revenue raising ability is moderate as cities are constrained by a 2% cap on the property tax levy. Cities can raise the levy above the cap for debt service, pensions and certain qualified expenses. Expenditures, which primarily consist of personnel and public safety, are highly predictable given a 2% arbitration award cap for disputes with police and fire employees. Cities have a moderate ability to adjust costs given the presence of collective bargaining and high fixed costs. Legal Security The bonds are secured by the borough's unlimited general obligation tax pledge. Use of Proceeds The proceeds of this issuance are going to fund various capital improvements including capital purchases and infrastructure upgrades. Obligor Profile Roselle Park Borough is located in Union County (Aa1 stable) adjacent to Elizabeth, NJ (Aa3 stable) and ten miles south of Newark, NJ (Baa3 negative). The borough's population according to the 2010 US Census was 13,297. Methodology The principal methodology used in this rating was US Local Government General Obligation Debt published in January 2014. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. 3

Ratings Exhibit 2 Roselle Park (Borough of) NJ Issue General Obligation Bonds, Series 2016 Rating Type Sale Amount Expected Sale Date Rating Description Rating Aa3 Underlying LT $4,925,000 11/17/2016 General Obligation Source: Moody's Investors Service 4

2016 Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ("MIS") ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody's Publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY'S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody's Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody's Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy." Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY'S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody's SF Japan K.K. ("MSFJ") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ("NRSRO"). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 5 1048568