A consolidated hearing on the above-captioned matters was held on November 20, 2013.

Similar documents
Complainants, Respondent. A hearing on the above-captioned matter was held on May 13, 2014.

Complainant, Respondent. A hearing on the above-captioned matter was held on April 23, 2013.

Hearings on the above-captioned matter were held on September 3, 2013 and on October 8,

Complainants, Respondent. A hearing on the above-captioned matter was held on June 4, 2013 and July 18, 2013.

Complainants, Respondents-Licensees. A hearing on the above-captioned matters was held on January 2, 2014 and January 30, 2014.

Complainants, Respondents-Licensees.

Complainant, Respondent. A hearing on the above-captioned matter was held on April 4, 2013 and on October 9,

STATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES DIVISION

BEFORE THE STATE OF ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DECISION

STATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES DIVISION

BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

STATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES DIVISION

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND CONSUMER FINANCE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. VS. Cause No RHONDA HARE d/b/a CONSENT ORDER

Dep t of Consumer Affairs v. Riverdale Towing Associates, Inc. OATH Index No. 1848/17, mem. dec. (Aug. 3, 2017)

YOUR RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES YOU HAVE THE FOLLOWING RIGHTS

IN A MATTER BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF BANKS DOCKET NO. 06:035:RAL ) ) ) ) )

Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Auth. v. Walsh OATH Index No. 153/04 (Jan. 23, 2004)

NYC Department of Consumer Affairs Regulatory Agenda for FY 2019

BEFORE THE HEARINGS EXAMINER FOR CLARK COUNTY, WASHINGTON I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

IN THE MATIER OF a Proceeding under The Certified General Accountants Act, 2010 and the Bylaws. IN THE MATIER OF Bhavesh Patel, a member of

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE

REVISED PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE NEVADA TAX COMMISSION. LCB File No. R146-15

STATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES DIVISION DOCKET NO. A DIA NO. 11ABD068

SUBCHAPTER 15 CIGARETTE TAX / OTHER TOBACCO PRODUCTS

BEFORE THE STATE OF ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL BY THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Comm n on Human Rights v. Shahid OATH Index No. 1381/13 (May 13, 2013)

I. Introduction DECISION. II. Facts IN THE MATTER OF ) ) WADE BALL, INC. Case No. OAH TOB Agency Case Nos

SUBCHAPTER 15 CIGARETTE TAX / OTHER TOBACCO PRODUCTS

CITY OF CHICAGO LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

Maryland Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

STATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES DIVISION

LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO

BEFORE THE NATIONAL BUSINESS CONDUCT COMMITTEE NASD REGULATION, INC. DECISION. District No. 7

Amendments That Encourage Compliance with the Tax Law and Enhance the Tax Department's Enforcement Ability

Conflicts of Interest Bd. v. Oni OATH Index No. 458/14 (Dec. 6, 2013), adopted, COIB Case No (May 14, 2014), appended

New York City Department of Consumer Affairs. Notice of Adoption

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BEFORE THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY DECISION

A REPORT BY THE NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER

RETAIL INSTALMENT CREDIT AGREEMENT ( RETAIL CHARGE)

CAPA REGULATORY AGENDA 2017 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

Department of Finance Post Office Box 3278 and Administration

STATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES DIVISION

RUSSELL L. HALL, CASE NO.: CVA LOWER COURT CASE NO.: CEB

LICENCE APPEAL TRIBUNAL

100TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY State of Illinois 2017 and 2018 HB0690

NOTICE OF CIVIL VIOLATION AND ORDER

Securities Industry (Amendment) Act, Act, Act 590 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

Conflicts of Interest Bd. v. Salce OATH Index No. 2379/13 (Nov. 8, 2013), adopted, Bd. Dec., COIB Case No (Mar. 27, 2014), appended

Dep t of Citywide Admin. Services v. Done

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL 1040 A BILL ENTITLED

HOME IMPROVEMENT BUSINESS TRUST FUND RULE. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs

TWELVE PICKET LANE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ASSESSMENT COLLECTION POLICY January 1, 2006

660-DOS-17. The respondent failed to appear. The Division of Licensing Services ( DLS ) was represented by Matthew Wolf, Esq.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

DECISION OF THE GENERAL MANAGER LIQUOR CONTROL AND LICENSING BRANCH IN THE MATTER OF. A hearing pursuant to Section 20 of

650 Nonbargaining Disciplinary, Grievance, and Appeal Procedures

Chapter RCW UNAUTHORIZED INSURERS

COMMISSION HEARING TORONTO, ONTARIO SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 NOTICE OF DECISION. IN THE MATTER OF THE RACING COMMISSION ACT, S.O. 2000, c.

Violation # Statute Violation Description Summary 1st Occurrence 2nd Occurrence 3rd & Subsequent Occurrences. Fine: C Revocation. Fine: C Revocation

TRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE DIVISION

Gerald Cassioppi, Ethics Commission Chairman Dan Hanlon, Ethics Adviser Rick Veenstra, Deputy Chief Assistant State s Attorney October 7, 2015

Checklist for FIRST TIME APPLICANTS and RENEWAL APPLICANTS:

Statutes Relevant to the Education and Licensure of Fire Sprinkler Inspectors KRS 198B (6401) (6417) Enacted 2010

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 11, 2016

CASE NAME: v. Registrar, Motor Vehicle Dealers Act 2002

ARBITRATION ACT. May 29, 2016>

Checklist for FIRST TIME APPLICANTS and RENEWAL APPLICANTS:

Arbitration Law no. 31 of 2001

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA ANDRÉ BERGERON NOTICE OF HEARING

State of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Kevin Murphy, Esq. Andreozzi Bluestein LLP 9145 Main Street Clarence, NY PH# (716) , Fax# (716)

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

Auditor Regulatory Sanctions Procedure

SERABRISA MAINTENANCE CORPORATION ASSESSMENT COLLECTION POLICY January 1, 2009

Metro Nashville vs. Angela Coleman, Appellant

LIBERTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, INC. (The Liberty Mutual Group)

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO THE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ACT, 1956 DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE

No CR STATE S BRIEF

GAMING ORDINANCE. Siletz Tribal Code 6.001

NOS CR CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE COMPANY 175 Water Street Group, Inc. New York, NY 10038

Florida Senate SB 1106

February 8, Enclosed is a copy of the decision resulting from the hearing held in the above-referenced matter. Sincerely,

A Hearing under Section 6 of the Tobacco and Vapour Products Control Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 451 as amended

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Rahman OATH Index No. 620/16 (Jan. 5, 2016)

THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS

Office of the Comptroller v. Jetstream Maintenance Corp. OATH Index No. 997/11 (Jan. 24, 2011), adopted, Comptroller s Dec. (Apr. 28, 2011), appended

New York City Department of Consumer Affairs. Notice of Public Hearing and Opportunity to Comment on Proposed Rules

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 20, 2000

LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT AUGLAIZE COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CASE NO

NEW YORK CITY TAXI AND LIMOUSINE COMMISSION. Notice of Public Hearing and Opportunity to Comment on Proposed Rules

GENERAL APPLICATION CHARITABLE SOLICITATIONS

BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

Transcription:

CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS ---------------------------------------------------------X DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, CONSOLIDATED DECISION AND ORDER against Complainant, Violation Nos.: GABBAR, NASREDEEN A. d/b/a 99 CONVENIENCE STORE Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------X License No.: 1451719 Respondent s Address: 1292 Washington Ave. Bronx, NY, 10456 A consolidated hearing on the above-captioned matters was held on November 20, 2013. Appearances: For the Department: Inspector J. Mendoza; Inspector P. Clemons. For the Respondent: Nasredeen A. Gabbar; Micah Kwasnik, Esq. The respondent was charged with violating the following: 1. NYC Administrative Code ( Administrative Code ) 17-715 for offering for sale flavored tobacco products (2 counts); 1. Administrative Code 17-706 for selling a tobacco product to a person under 18 years of age. (1 count); 2. New York State Public Health Law ( PHL ) 1399-cc(2) for selling a tobacco product to a person under 18 years of age (1 count); and 3. PHL 1399-cc(2) for failing to post a tobacco notice sign that advises that the sale of electronic cigarettes to persons under 18 years of age is prohibited by law (1 count). Based on the evidence in this case, I RECOMMEND the following: Findings of Fact On September 14, 2013, the respondent did not post a tobacco notice sign which advises the sale of electronic cigarettes to persons less than 18 years of age is prohibited by law. The respondent sold a pack of Newport cigarettes to a person less than 18 years of age.

Page 2 On September 25, 2013 the respondent offered flavored tobacco products for sale. The respondent previously pleaded guilty to a violation of PHL 1399- cc(2) on August 28, 2013 (see TP070018086). Opinion OL005319774 The Department established the violation by a preponderance of the credible evidence. Inspector Mendoza gave consistent and credible testimony, supported by corroborating documentary evidence, that the respondent s employee offered him flavored cigars for sale for $1.00 each. 1 Mr. Gabbar s conflicting claims, that all the flavored tobacco products were going to be returned to the supplier but were opened because they were for personal use, do not establish a meritorious defense to the charge. Accordingly, the charge will be sustained. The Department established the violations by a preponderance of the credible evidence. Inspector Clemons credibly testified, supported by corroborating documentary evidence, that he observed the respondent s employee sell a pack of Newport cigarettes to a person less than 18 years of age for $11. 2 Inspector Clemons also credibly testified, supported by the Notice of Hearing prepared contemporaneously with the inspection, that the respondent did not post a tobacco notice sign including the language electronic cigarettes. 3 Mr. Gabbar s unsupported assertion that, before the inspection, he posted a sign including that language does not credible rebut the Department s case. Accordingly the charges shall be sustained. ORDER The respondent is found guilty of violating the charge and is ordered to pay to the Department a TOTAL FINE of $1,000, which is immediately due and owing, as follows: 1 See Department s exhibits A-C. The respondent did not rebut the inspector s testimony, though given an opportunity to do so. 2 See Department s exhibits D-F. The respondent did not rebut the inspector s testimony, though given an opportunity to do so. 3 The respondent did not rebut the inspector s testimony, though given an opportunity to do so.

Administrative Code Section 17-715: $ 1,000 ($500 per count, for 2 counts) Page 3 The respondent is found guilty of violating the charges and ordered to pay to the Department a TOTAL FINE of $4,100, which is immediately due and owing as follows: Administrative Code Section 17-706: $ 1,000 New York State Public Health Law Section 1399-cc(2): $ 3,000 ($1,500 per count, for 2 counts) Total Surcharge: $100 ($50 per violation of Article 13-F of the New York State Public Health Law) Two (2) points are assigned to the respondent s State cigarette/tobacco products retail dealer s registration record for its violation of Public Health Law Section1399-cc. If respondent operates while the license is revoked, the respondent will be subject to criminal prosecution and/or civil penalties of at least $100 per day for each and every day of unlicensed activity, as well as the closing of the respondent s business and/or the removal of items sold, offered for sale, or utilized in the operation of such business, pursuant to Administrative Code Sections 20-105 and 20-106 (the Padlock Law ). If the respondent has accumulated a total of three (3) or more points on its State cigarette/tobacco products retail dealer s registration record, the Commissioner of the State Department of Taxation and Finance and the Director of the New York State Lottery will each be notified to SUSPEND the respondent s State cigarette/tobacco products retail dealer s registration and lottery license for six (6) months. If the respondent has violated NYS PHL 1399-dd three (3) times within a two (2)-year period, or four (4) or more times cumulatively, the Commissioner of the State Department of Taxation and Finance will be notified to SUSPEND respondent s State cigarette/tobacco products retail dealer s registration and lottery license for one (1) year.

Page 4 If the respondent has violated Article 13-F of the New York State Public Health Law on four (4) or more occasions within a three (3)-year period, the Commissioner of the State Department of Taxation and Finance and the Director of the New York State Lottery will each be notified to REVOKE the respondent s State cigarette/tobacco products retail dealer s registration and lottery license for one (1) year. If the respondent has violated NYS PHL 1399 of the while its State cigarette/tobacco products retail dealer s registration was suspended, the Commissioner of the State Department of Taxation and Finance will be notified to PERMANENTLY REVOKE the respondent s State cigarette/tobacco products retail dealer s and lottery license registration. This constitutes the recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge. Shanet Viruet Administrative Law Judge DECISION AND ORDER: The recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge is approved. This constitutes an Order of the Department. Failure to comply with this Order within thirty (30) days shall result in the suspension of the respondent s DCA cigarette retail dealer s license, and may result in the suspension of any other Department of Consumer Affairs license(s) held by the respondent. Failure to comply with this Order includes the payment of the fine with a check that is dishonored or by a credit card transaction that is denied or reversed. Date: 22 November 2013 James M. Plotkin Deputy Director of Adjudication PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that two or more violations of Administrative Code 17-704, 17-705 and/or 17-706 within a two-year period may result in the revocation of your DCA cigarette retail dealer s license. A third or subsequent violation of Administrative Code 17-704, 17-705 and/or 17-706 within a two-year period shall result in the mandatory revocation of your DCA cigarette retail dealer s license.

Page 5 PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that an accumulation of 3 or more points on your New York State cigarette retail dealer s record within a 36-month period will result in a 6-month suspension of your State cigarette retail dealer s registration AND a 6-month suspension of your lottery license. In addition, 4 or more violations of Article 13-F of the Public Health Law within a three-year period shall result in a one-year revocation of your State retail dealer s registration AND your lottery license. These penalties are in addition to the any other penalties required or permitted by Public Health Law Article 13-F. cc: Micah Kwasnik, Esq. Via email: micahkwasnik@yahoo.com Mail payment in the enclosed envelope addressed to: NYC Department of Consumer Affairs Collections Division 42 Broadway, 9 th Floor New York, NY 10004 APPEAL INFORMATION You have 30 days to file an APPEAL of this decision. You must include with your appeal all of the following: (1) a check or money order payable to DCA for the sum of $25; and (2) a check or money order payable to DCA for the amount of the fine imposed by the decision, or an application for a waiver of the requirement to pay the fine as a requisite for an appeal, based upon financial hardship. The application must be supported by evidence of financial hardship, including the most recent tax returns you have filed. BY EMAIL: Send your appeal to myappeal@dca.nyc.gov and, at the same time, mail the $25 appeal fee to: DCA Administrative Tribunal, 66 John Street, 11 th Floor, New York, NY 10038. (Make sure to write the violation number(s) on your check or money order.) You may pay the fine online at www.nyc.gov/consumers, or mail a check or money order to: DCA, Collections Division, 42 Broadway, NY, NY 10004. BY REGULAR MAIL: Mail your appeal and the appeal fee to: Director of Adjudication, Department of Consumer Affairs, 66 John Street, 11 th Floor, New York, NY 10038. You must also mail a copy of your appeal to: DCA, Legal Division, 42 Broadway, 9 th Floor, New York, NY 10004. Make sure to include in your appeal some indication or proof that you have sent a copy of the appeal to DCA s Legal Division. You may pay the fine online at www.nyc.gov/consumers, or mail a check or money order to: DCA, Collections Division, 42 Broadway, NY, NY 10004.