FINANCIAL PLAN REVIEW AND FORECAST

Similar documents
FY 2013/14 Proposed Operating Budget

Final COST OF SERVICE STUDY SEPTEMBER City of San Clemente

Study Workshops are designed to be both educational and to seek broad direction from the Board

2016 Water and Recycled Water Rate Study PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 12, 2016

MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT FINANCIAL PLAN AND RATE AND FEE STUDY FINAL REPORT. September 2013

WASTEWATER FINANCIAL PLAN STUDY REPORT

NALDRAFT SEPTEMBER2015 WASTEWATE

Temescal Valley Water District

FY 2013/14 Budget and FY 2013/ /23 Ten Year Capital Improvement Plan. Board of Directors June 19, 2013

Comprehensive Rate Study & Cost Allocation Analysis. Public Workshop December 4, 2017

WATER UTILITY FINANCIAL PLAN AND RATE STUDY CITY OF WHITEFISH, MT MARCH 2016

YORK COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA

Through: Finance, Legal, and Administration Committee (06/10/15) Chief Financial Officer / Assistant General Manager

City of Vista Wastewater Final Report Financial Plan. January 2013

Water Consultancy. Montecito Sanitary District Wastewater Rate Study Report. Montecito Sanitary District

FY 2013/14 Preliminary Regional Wastewater, Recycled Water and Recharge Water Program Budget and TYCIP. Regional Committees April 4, 2013

Water & Sewer Rate Study. Water & Sewer Cost of Service Rate Study. City of Norco, CA. Draft Report for

WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY

City of Arroyo Grande Department of Public Works REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY UPDATE

Water and Wastewater Utility Rates

City of Benicia. Rate Study Update: Water & Wastewater Rates

INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY RESERVE POLICY Updated as of May 2014 Policy Statement. Purpose of Fund Reserve Policy

City of San Carlos Sewer Financial Plan & Rate Update

The City of Sierra Madre

GOLETA SANITARY DISTRICT BUDGET FISCAL YEAR

WATER AND SEWER RATE STUDY

AGENDA YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS WORKSHOP MEETING Thursday, June 8, 2017, 4:00 PM 1717 E Miraloma Ave, Placentia CA 92870

CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS

4. SAFETY MOMENT: Director Mott read the safety topic: Motorcycle Safety Month.

From: Lex Warmath and Elaine Conti, Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc.

Goleta Water District

City of Rohnert Park SEWER FINANCIAL PLAN

CITY OF REDLANDS WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY. Prepared by:

West Valley Sanitation District FINANCIAL PLAN & RATE STUDY. January 2018

WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES RATE STUDY

Squaw Valley PSD. Water & Sewer Rate and Connection Fee Study. Presented by: Shawn Koorn Associate Vice President HDR Engineering, Inc.

Revenue Plan. August 12, Dennis Davies Deputy Director of Public Works 200 Civic Center Way El Cajon, CA 92020

City and Borough of Juneau, AK WATER UTILITY AND WASTEWATER UTILITY RATE STUDY

WATER VALIDATION, COST OF SERVICE & RATE DESIGN ANALYSIS WASTEWATER VALIDATION & RATE ANALYSIS MISCELLANEOUS FEES & OVERHEAD RATE ANALYSIS

Santa Clarita Water Division

Sewer Rate Study CRESCENT CITY CALIFORNIA

2016 Water and Recycled Water Rate Study WEBINAR WITH DISTRICT STAFF JUNE 29, 2016

La Cañada Irrigation District

April 6, Katherine Godbey Director of Finance, Coachella Valley Water District Hovley Lane East Palm Desert, CA 92260

McKenzie Surface Water Source Alternatives

YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT

LONG BEACH WATER DEPARTMENT COST OF SERVICE AND RATE STUDY

STORM WATER USER RATE STUDY

Water Rate Study FINAL January 31, 2018

City of Cocoa FY 2010 Utility Rate Study. Final Report. Water, Sewer & Reclaimed Water Rates, Fees & Charges Study. Prepared by:

Great Lakes Water Authority/ Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Five-year Financial Forecast Cash Basis. July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2020

CITY OF CALISTOGA WATER RATE STUDY FINAL REPORT

Marina Coast Water District Marina, California

Third Quarter Financial Report Fiscal Year and. Mid-Term Budget Update - Fiscal Year June 15, 2015

Notice of a public hearing

Sanitation Rate Study Final Report

Table 2-2 Projected Water Production and Costs

MONROE CITY COUNCIL. Agenda Bill No

UTILITY RESERVE POLICY FINAL REPORT

Louisville Water Company. Utility and Public Works Advisory Group Bond Covenants/Finance/Rates February 8, 2012

Regional Wastewater System Financial Assessment Technical Memorandum

Marina Coast Water District Marina, California

CITY OF RAPID CITY. Financial and Rate Setting Policies for the Water and Water Reclamation Utilities

BODEGA BAY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT Water and Wastewater Rate Study

SAUSALITO-MARIN CITY SANITARY DISTRICT 1 EAST ROAD SAUSALITO, CALIFORNIA Telephone: (415) Fax: (415)

WATER, WASTEWATER AND STORM DRAIN RATE STUDY

City of Ann Arbor - Water Rate Study. Draft Results Workbook

ORANGE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY

Managing Financial Risk and Declining Demand. Presentation Outline

City of Sanibel. Sewer Expansion Feasibility Study Update GAI #A

Utility Rate Public Hearing City Council Meeting

FORT COLLINS- LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT

RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT

Water Services Rate Study

CITY OF OXNARD WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY. FINAL May 2017

Meeting & Outreach efforts

City of Buffalo Water and Sewer Rate Study. Nick Anhut Jessica Cook

SUMMERLAND SANITARY DISTRICT

Completed Projects 17/18

Water Rate Study Final Report

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission

Water and Sewer Rates

WATER USER RATES & FEE STUDY

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION WATER RATES ANALYSIS REPORT OCTOBER 7, 2009

Wastewater Rate Study. Villa Park, Illinois

COUNTY SANITATION. DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY

The series 2008 Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds Feasibility Report recommended the City perform and implement a rate study for the following reasons:

Transparency Continue to provide a platform for transparent communication and timely reporting.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY

Through: Finance, Legal, and Administration Committee (3/11/15) Chief Financial Officer/Assistant General Manager

Water and Sewer Utility Rate Studies

Cash Reserve Policy Guidelines. Copyright 2018 American Water Works Association

Town of Yountville Wastewater Rate Study Update 2017/18

July 1, Tier Percent of Allocation Cost per ccf $0.91 $1.27 $2.86 $4.80 $ % % % % 201+%


CITY OF SAN MATEO. Administrative Report

FY BUDGET BUDGET SECTION SUMMARY

Water and Sewer Rate Study

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Letter of Transmittal. i-viii Summary of Operating Fund & Capital Fund Balances... 1

Rate Model Peer Review and Rate Increase Justifications. PRESENTATION TO: City of Redlands

Transcription:

Napa Sanitation District Cost of Service Rate and Capacity Charge Study Technical Memorandum #2 FINANCIAL PLAN REVIEW AND FORECAST DRAFT March 2018

Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Project Background 1 1.1.1 About NapaSan 1 1.2 Financial Review and Forecast 1 1.2.1 Analysis and Financial Tests Performed 1 2 Growth and Inflation Forecast 2 2.1 Growth Assumptions 2 2.2 Inflation Assumptions 2 3 Revenue Requirements Analysis 3 3.1 Financial Plan Basis 3 3.2 Financial Tests 3 3.2.1 Cash Flow Test 3 3.2.2 Debt Coverage Test 5 3.2.3 Reserve Tests 6 4 Financial Plan Assessment 8 4.1 Revenue Requirement 8 Tables Table 1 Cost Escalation and Growth Rates by Fiscal Year 2 Table 2 Financial Forecast Prior to Scheduled Revenue Increases 4 Table 3 Financial Forecast Following Scheduled Revenue Increases 5 Table 4 Debt Coverage Test Following Increases 6 Table 5 Reserve Balance Forecast Following Increases 7 Table 6 Revenue Requirements 9 Figures Figure 1 Projected Revenues and Expenses 8 Figure 2 Projected Sewer Service Charge 8 ii MARCH 2018 [DRAFT]

Abbreviations 2016 SSC Study 2016 Sewer Service Charge Rate Study AF Carollo City County EDU MGD NapaSan SFR SSC TM Acre-feet Carollo Engineers, Inc. City of Napa, CA Napa County, CA Equivalent Dwelling Unit million gallons per day Napa Sanitation District Single Family Residential Sewer Service Charge Technical Memorandum [DRAFT] MARCH 2018 iii

1 Introduction 1.1 Project Background Napa Sanitation District (NapaSan) retained Carollo Engineers, Inc. (Carollo) to conduct a study regarding its sewer service charge (SSC) and capacity charge methodologies, among other financial analyses. As outlined in the project scope, Carollo will deliver a series of six technical memoranda (TM) outlining the analysis and recommendation for each individual topic covered by the study. Those topics are as follows: TM #1 Residential Customer Data Analysis and Recommendations TM #2 Financial Plan Review and Forecast TM #3 Cost of Service Analysis and Results TM #4 Billing Procedures Review and Recommendations TM #5 Capacity Charge Analysis and Recommendations TM #6 Sewer Service Charge Analysis and Recommendations The final project deliverable will be presented to NapaSan as a compilation of the six TMs outlining Carollo s methodologies, results, and recommendations. 1.1.1 About NapaSan NapaSan provides wastewater collection and treatment for approximately 82,000 residents, primarily in the City of Napa, California. NapaSan treats 10 million gallons per day (MGD), with a total treatment capacity of 15.4 MGD. NapaSan is able to reclaim a portion of its wastewater flows for recycled water usage, producing approximately 650 million gallons per year. 1.2 Financial Review and Forecast As part of the project deliverables, NapaSan requested that Carollo review NapaSan s current ten-year financial forecast and the proposed revenue requirements, debt coverages, and funding plan. Carollo compiled information from the following sources to develop a financial model to test the overall financial forecast prepared by NapaSan: O&M budgets, with past actuals and proposed budgets for the next fiscal year Expense summaries by department Debt service schedules Capital improvement plans through fiscal year ending () 2028 Assumed service area growth and cost escalation rates Non-conventional financing, such as grants and SRF loans 1.2.1 Analysis and Financial Tests Performed This analysis conducted three primary financial tests to assess NapaSan s financial plan. [DRAFT] MARCH 2018 1

Cash Flow Sufficiency Test The cash flow test defines the amount of annual revenues that must be generated in order to meet annual expenditure obligations of the utility as well as maintain sufficient reserves. Bond Coverage Sufficiency Test Bond coverage refers to the collection in revenues to meet all operating expenses and debt service obligations plus an additional multiple of that debt service. NapaSan has a legally required minimum bond coverage ratio of 1.25 times (1.25x); however, for the purpose of prudent financial planning the bond coverage test was set to meet a 1.50x coverage ratio. Reserves Test The reserve test ensures that each cost center has enough money in reserves in order to continue funding operations and CIP during unexpected revenue shortfalls according to the District's reserve targets. This test is not legally binding and reserve targets can be reduced in some cases in order to mitigate rate payer impacts. 2 Growth and Inflation Forecast 2.1 Growth Assumptions NapaSan currently projects annual growth of approximately 0.7 percent on average over the next ten years. Annual growth over the next three years is projected between 1 and 1.25 percent, while 2021 and beyond is projected at approximately 0.6 percent on average. The annual escalation rates for 2019 through 2027 are outlined in Table 1. 2.2 Inflation Assumptions Inflation for labor costs was assumed at 3.3 percent on average, while supplies and services were escalated at 2 percent. Capital costs were escalated at 3.2 percent. The annual escalation rates for 2019 through 2027 are outlined in Table 1. Table 1 Cost Escalation and Growth Rates by Fiscal Year Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Customers 1.1 1.2 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Labor 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 Supplies & Services 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Capital / Construction 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 (1) All figures in percents. 2027 2 MARCH 2018 [DRAFT]

3 Revenue Requirements Analysis 3.1 Financial Plan Basis NapaSan s current financial plan was developed as part of its 2016 Sewer Service Charge Rate Study (2016 SSC Study) performed by NBS. The 2016 SSC Study recommended a series of revenue increases for NapaSan in order to maintain positive cash flows, meet debt coverage obligations, and satisfy reserve policies. The customer growth assumption was applied to current revenues and forecasted against projected expenditures for the next several years in order to test the validity of the recommended revenue increases. 3.2 Financial Tests 3.2.1 Cash Flow Test As shown in Table 2, the current revenue is not sufficient to meet operational or capital needs over the next several years. Revenue increases will be needed in order to maintain positive cash flow and fund capital projects and reserves. This revenue projection is based on the 2017 revenue levels, escalated by service area growth factors found in Table 1. The scheduled revenue increases, along with the adjusted financial forecast, are outlined in Table 3. [DRAFT] MARCH 2018 3

Table 2 Financial Forecast Prior to Scheduled Revenue Increases Category 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Revenues Sewer Service Charge (2) $22,800 $23,000 $23,200 $23,500 $23,600 Capacity Charges 3,600 4,200 5,100 1,800 2,700 Recycled Water Sales 900 1,000 1,200 1,300 1,300 Other Operating Revenues 500 500 500 500 500 Total Operating Revenues $27,700 $28,700 $30,000 $27,100 $28,100 Interest $200 $200 $300 $400 $400 Rents and leases 700 700 700 700 700 Grants 4,100 - - - - Loans 10,100 2,000 - - 1,000 Total Non-Operating Revenues $15,100 $3,000 $1,000 $1,100 $2,100 Total Revenues $42,900 $31,700 $31,000 $28,200 $30,200 Expenditures Salaries and Benefits 9,600 9,900 10,200 10,600 10,900 Services and Supplies 5,800 5,900 6,000 6,200 6,300 Debt 4,800 4,800 5,900 5,900 5,900 S&S - OTO - - 200 300 - Total Operating Expenses $20,200 $20,700 $22,500 $23,000 $23,200 Capital Projects $25,000 $15,200 $12,600 $12,500 $10,800 Additions to Meet Fund Targets 400 3,000 10,000 15,400 24,200 Total Non-Operating Expenses $25,500 $18,100 $22,500 $27,900 $35,000 Total Expenses $45,700 $38,800 $45,000 $50,900 $58,200 GAAP Adjustment 500 - - - - Surplus/(Deficit) (2) $(2,300) $(7,100) $(14,000) $(22,700) $(28,000) Ending Reserve Balance $12,500 $8,300 $4,300 $(3,100) $(6,900) (1) All figures in thousand dollars. (2) Revenue and cash flow figures are prior to any scheduled revenue adjustments. 4 MARCH 2018 [DRAFT]

Table 3 Financial Forecast Following Scheduled Revenue Increases Category 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Baseline Revenues $42,900 $35,100 $36,100 $34,800 $38,000 Operating Expenses 20,200 20,700 22,500 23,000 23,200 Non-Operating Expenses & Capital 24,600 15,200 12,600 12,600 10,800 Surplus / (Deficit) (pre-increase) $(1,900) $(800) $1,000 $(800) $4,000 Revenue Increase 15% 6% 5% 4% 3% Additional Revenue $3,400 $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 $900 Surplus / (Deficit) (post-increase) $1,500 $800 $2,400 $400 $4,900 (1) All figures in thousand dollars. 3.2.2 Debt Coverage Test The debt coverage test is stipulated in the official statement for each bond series that NapaSan issues. NapaSan s stipulated debt coverage is 1.25x, meaning that revenues minus operating expenditures must be 25 percent greater than the debt service due in that fiscal year. While 1.25x is the mandated debt coverage ratio, this analysis assumes a more conservative 1.50x coverage. This allows NapaSan to plan without coming close to the 1.25x threshold. Not all revenues are allowed in the debt coverage test. For NapaSan, all sewer service charge and capacity charge revenues are allowed in the debt coverage calculation. Some non-operating revenues, such as interest, rents, and leases, are permitted, while grant and loan proceeds are not. The overview of revenues and expenditures included in this test are outlined in Table 4. The revenues outlined in the analysis are following the revenue increases show in Table 3, under the assumption that needed increases are cash flow driven and not debt driven. Based on this assumption, NapaSan is projected to well exceed its debt coverage ratio requirements. [DRAFT] MARCH 2018 5

Table 4 Debt Coverage Test Following Increases Category 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Allowable Revenues User Charges $22,800 $26,400 $28,300 $30,100 $31,400 Other Operating Revenues 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,800 1,800 Non-Operating Revenues 900 1,000 1,000 1,100 1,100 Capacity Charges 3,600 4,200 5,100 1,800 2,700 Total Allowable Revenues $28,600 $33,100 $36,100 $34,800 $37,000 Expenditures Operating Expenses $15,400 $15,800 $16,300 $16,800 $17,200 Debt Service 4,800 4,800 5,900 5,900 5,900 1.50x Coverage 2,400 2,400 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total Expenditures plus Coverage $22,600 $23,100 $25,200 $25,700 $26,100 Debt Coverage Surplus/(Deficit) $6,100 $10,000 $10,900 $9,100 $10,900 Debt Coverage Ratio 2.77x 3.57x 3.33x 3.04x 3.34x (1) All figures in thousand dollars. 3.2.3 Reserve Tests NapaSan currently maintains three reserves in order to maintain smooth funding of operating expenses. The operating reserve is designed to assist NapaSan during emergencies. This reserve is maintained at 15% of annual operating expenses, excluding debt service and transfers. The cash flow reserve is the amount of cash necessary for NapaSan to have on hand on July 1 to cover its anticipated expenses through the summer and fall until NapaSan receives the bulk of its operating revenues (sewer services charges collected as property assessments) in December. The debt reserve held in trust by a third party. This reserve is a requirement of the 2009B COP bond covenants and is used to ensure that debt service payments will be made in full and on time. The debt reserve requirement was eliminated when the 2009B COPs were refinanced in December 2017. In addition, NapaSan will begin funding a rehabilitation and repair fund for its recycled water assets beginning in 2020. The forecast of reserve balances under the scheduled revenue adjustments is outlined in Table 5. 6 MARCH 2018 [DRAFT]

Table 5 Reserve Balance Forecast Following Increases Category 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Cash Flow after Expenses $1,520 $870 $2,460 $460 $4,930 Operating Reserve Target $2,310 $2,400 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 Beginning Balance $2,240 $2,310 $2,400 $4,000 $5,000 Transfers In / (Out) 70 90 1,600 1,000 1,000 Ending Balance $2,310 $2,400 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 Cash Flow Reserve Target $10,750 $11,000 $11,000 $11,250 $11,600 Beginning Balance $10,120 $11,570 $14,340 $13,990 $13,320 Transfers In / (Out) 1,450 2,770 (360) (670) 3,800 Ending Balance $11,570 $14,340 $13,990 $13,320 $17,120 Debt Reserve Target $1,990 $- $1,100 $1,100 $1,100 Beginning Balance $1,990 $1,990 $- $1,100 $1,100 Transfers In / (Out) - (1,990) 1,100 - - Ending Balance $1,990 $- $1,100 $1,100 $1,100 RW R&R Reserve Target $- $- $120 $240 $380 Beginning Balance $- $- $- $120 $240 Transfers In / (Out) - - 120 130 130 Ending Balance $- $- $120 $240 $380 Total Reserve Funds Balance $15,900 $16,700 $19,200 $19,700 $24,600 Fund Equity Available for Use (2) $820 $3,340 $2,990 $2,070 $5,520 (1) All figures in thousand dollars. (2) Fund equity available for use is equal to the sum of all reserve fund balances, less the sum of reserve fund targets. A negative fund equity level indicates that one or more of the reserve balances are below the policy target. [DRAFT] MARCH 2018 7

Annual Sewer Service Charge Millions 4 Financial Plan Assessment Based on this analysis, Carollo anticipates that NapaSan will achieve its financial objectives with the scheduled revenue increases. The scheduled increases are projected to pass the cash flow, debt coverage, and reserve funding tests in each of the next five fiscal years (through 2023). The projected revenues and expenses are shown in Figure 1. $70 $60 $50 Debt Service Capital O&M Revenues Revenues w/ Grants/Loans $40 $30 $20 $10 $- 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Figure 1 Projected Revenues and Expenses Beyond 2023, NapaSan is projected to achieve the same benchmarks in all years, except for a slight drop below cash flow needs in 2024. However, this is a small shortfall (approximately $94,000) and can be covered with fund equity available for use ($4.27 million). The forecasted sewer service charge under each fiscal year is shown in Figure 2. 4.1 Revenue Requirement The revenue requirement outlines the total revenue target for the user rates based on the results of the financial tests (cash flow, debt coverage, and reserves). Table 6 outlines the calculation of the revenue requirement based on the scheduled revenue increases discussed in this tech memo. $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 $638 $676 $710 $739 $761 $784 $807 $831 $856 $555 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Figure 2 Projected Sewer Service Charge 8 MARCH 2018 [DRAFT]

Table 6 Revenue Requirements Category 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Baseline Total Revenues $42,900 $35,100 $36,100 $34,800 $38,000 Additional Revenue from Increase 3,400 1,600 1,400 1,200 900 Less: Capacity Charges $(3,600) $(4,200) $(5,100) $(1,800) $(2,700) Recycled Water Sales (900) (1,000) (1,200) (1,300) (1,300) Other Operating Revenues (500) (500) (500) (500) (500) Interest (200) (200) (300) (400) (400) Rents and Leases (700) (700) (700) (700) (700) Grants (4,100) - - - - Loans (10,100) (2,000) - - (1,000) Revenue Requirement for SSC $26,200 $28,000 $29,700 $31,300 $32,300 (1) All figures in thousand dollars. [DRAFT] MARCH 2018 9