TEXAS METROPOLITAN MOBILITY PLAN: FUNDING NEW OPPORTUNITIES

Similar documents
2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE

DRAFT UTP November Update - Funding Adjustments Summary EXHIBIT A REVISION DATE 11/7/14. (Amounts in millions) Sum $0

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. TxDOT has a Plan STRATEGIC PLAN FOR

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing

Public Hearing Tarrant County. April 14, 2009

15,790. Bryan Waco Region. Do you own or lease a personal vehicle? What is your primary means of transportation?

17,321 13,351. Overall Statewide Results. How was the survey taken? Do you own or lease a personal vehicle?

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

Presentation by Joseph R. Krier Greater SA Chamber President/CEO

TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF TASK FORCE COMMITTEE ACTIVITY

CHAPTER 4 FINANCIAL STRATEGIES: PAYING OUR WAY

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

FUNDING CHANGES TO IH 635 EAST AND PROPOSITION 1 PROJECTS

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

The Value of Metrorail and Virginia Railway Express to the Commonwealth of Virginia

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Regional Toll Revenue Annual Financial Report

Measure I Strategic Plan, April 1, 2009 Glossary Administrative Committee Advance Expenditure Agreement (AEA) Advance Expenditure Process

Contents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205

8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

FY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION POLICY Policies and Procedures to Streamline Project Delivery

Transportation Funding

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT WITH COMMENTS AND RESPONSES. October Submitted for Review to TxDOT Executive Management

Development of the Cost Feasible Plan

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Chapter 6: Financial Resources

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Transportation Planning FAQ s

Methodology. Surveyed members from influential Chambers of Commerce in Texas: Arlington, Austin, Corpus Christi, Dallas, Fort Worth, and San Antonio.

UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

TEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012)

POLICY BENEFITS OF MPO MERGER

Transportation Improvement Program and Incentives for Local Planning

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Figure 1-1: SR 156 Study Area & Monterey Expressway Alignment

ALL Counties. ALL Districts

HB 20 Initial Report. Revenue Projections Funding Categories & Allocations Performance-Based Decision Making

Circulation Draft Created on 12/8/2009 2:58:00 PM

Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

Findings and Analysis

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

TXDOT CONGESTION RELIEF INITIATIVE, INCLUDING

Congestion Management Process. Prepared by: Ghyabi & Associates, Inc.

FY 2011 Continuing Appropriations Act. TIGER Discretionary Grant Program

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

TOLLED MANAGED LANE POLICIES

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Proposal for SH 121 Toll Project. Monday, May 7, 2007

Arlington Transportation Demand Managment Strategic Plan FY FY2040

House Bill 20 Implementation. House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.

Description of the Submission / Conditions Precedent

An Evaluation of the 2009 NHTS Add-on Surveys in Texas

Gary Halbrooks Vice Chair. Smith County. Jeff Sandford Bowie County. Robert Murray Bowie County

FY February Quarterly Revision. Houston DISTRICT

CONSTRUCTION STAFFING. Mario R. Jorge, P.E. District Engineer San Antonio District

Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance


TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRYAN DISTRICT T I P

AAPA Port Facilities Engineering Seminar

MODULE 1: FUNDING TRANSIT IN TEXAS MODULE 1 1

Texas Highway Funding. Legislative Primer

CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN

Managed Lanes: Transaction Strategies from the PPP Forefront

Memorandum. Agenda Item 2. TO: Conunission. DA TE: December 8, FR: Executive Director. RE: Regional Measure 3. Background

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Transportation Funding Options

Chapter VIII Financial Plan

Honolulu High-Capacity Transit Corridor Project Alternatives Analysis

TECHNICAL ADSVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA

2045 Long Range Transportation

Appendix J: MTP Checklist. Introduction

Introduction. December 2008

Section C Forms

City of Fort Worth Budget Work Session Transportation Funding Discussion August 25 th 2016

Working with Proportionate Fair-Share

Texas Cities Debt Summary

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Minimum Elements of a Local Comprehensive Plan

Working with Proportionate Fair-Share

FY STIP. Houston District. November Quarterly Revisions TRANSIT STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance

Referendum 51 Gets Us Moving, Safely, Again

2007 Legislative Program Northern Virginia Transportation Authority Approved: November 10, 2006

Countywide Dialogue on Transportation

MTC OVERVIEW OF SB 1 (BEALL AND FRAZIER)

Table 2.7 I-73 Economic Impact Summary in Value Change (Alternatives compared to No-Build)

Increased Transportation Infrastructure Investment Critical to State s Continued Economic Development

2040 Plan Update. Land Use Advisory Committee March 16, 2017

In addition to embarking on a new dialogue on Ohio s transportation priorities,

1 R E G I O N A L M O B I L I T Y P L A N

I-77 Express Lanes Project Project Update. Rodger Rochelle October 2014

Public Transportation Advisory Committee. Meeting Handouts January 24, 2019

Strengthening Vermont s Economy by Integrating Transportation and Smart Growth Policy

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

University Link LRT Extension

FY Transportation Improvement Program: STP-MM Project Selection. Transportation Policy Board Meeting March 26, 2018

Transcription:

TEXAS METROPOLITAN MOBILITY PLAN: FUNDING NEW OPPORTUNITIES Public Meetings June 12 and 13, 2006 Michael Morris, P.E. Director of Transportation Michael Burbank, AICP Principal Transportation Planner

FOCUS ON LARGEST METROPOLITAN AREAS Transportation Management Areas (Over 200,000): Austin Corpus Christi Dallas-Fort Worth El Paso Hidalgo County Houston / Galveston Lubbock San Antonio

RESULTS OF 1 st TMMP EFFORT (2004) Key Conclusions from the Texas Transportation Commission: Congestion is bad and getting worse, and traditional funds cannot keep up There are many types of solutions to this problem Solutions will be expensive Solving the problem will have great benefits Partnerships are the key to solving the problem We are off to a great start, and need to keep going

GOALS RELIEVE CONGESTION IMPROVE SAFETY IMPROVE AIR QUALITY IMPROVE QUALITY OF LIFE EXPAND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INCREASE THE VALUE OF TRANSPORTATION ASSETS ENHANCE INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE STREAMLINE PROJECT DELIVERY

PROCESS OVERVIEW ALL MODES / MAXIMIZE FLEXIBILITY INNOVATIVE FUNDING / OUT YEAR NEEDS TxDOT CONGESTION INDEX MEASURABLE PERFORMANCE PLANS (e.g., Freight, Intermodal) PROGRAMS (e.g. ITS, Haz.Mat.) POLICIES (e.g. Access Management, Truck Lanes) PROJECTS (e.g. Toll Roads) PARTNERSHIPS

RELATIONSHIP TO THE MTP Metropolitan Transportation Plan The MTP is required to be financially constrained and balanced to anticipated revenue streams over time. The Texas Metropolitan Mobility Plan goes one step further and becomes a needs-based plan which quantifies transportation needs beyond the fiscal constraint barrier.

POLICIES Texas Congestion. Index (TCI) Value TEXAS METROPOLITAN MOBILITY PLAN TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL RUNS. Eliminate LOS F Conditions (Target Level). 2030 Do-nothing. TRADITIONAL 2030 Revenue-Constrained (Fund 6). BENEFIT OF NEW TOOLS 2030 Financially-Constrained MTP. UNFUNDED 2030 Needs-Based 2000 2015 2030. Model Run 2000 Baseline 2030 Do-Nothing 2030 MTP 2030 Needs Based 2030 Revenue Constrained Trip Tables 2000 Trip Table 2030 Trip Table 2030 Trip Table 2030 Trip Table 2030 Trip Table Travel Model Network 2000 Network 2000 Network 2030 Network Financially-Constrained MTP 2030 Network MTP + Additional Needs to solve LOS F MTP 2030 minus all new toll roads & managed facilities

CORRIDOR NEEDS The deficiencies shown reflect out-year needs and represent the additional need above and beyond the financially-constrained Metropolitan Transportation Plan, currently Mobility 2025: Amended April 2005

LANE MILES NEEDED AND COST ESTIMATES (Dallas-Fort Worth Region) Existing Lane Miles ( Baseline ) 2006 TMMP Mobility 2025: Amended April 2005 Total Lane Miles Added Cost (Billions/2006$) Eliminate Level-of-Service F Additional Lane Additional Miles Cost (Billions/2006$) Needed Freeways/Tollways 3,749 Lane Miles 2,106 Lane Miles $13.9 2,097 Lane Miles $11.8 Arterials 14,676 Lane Miles 6,420 Lane Miles $5.8 2,541 Lane Miles $5.9 Freeway-to-Freeway Interchanges TOTAL 18,425 Lane Miles (1) Included in Freeway cost above. (2) Could be addressed by a multitude of modal options and programs. 8,526 Lane Miles 1 39 Interchanges $19.7 4,638 Lane Miles $8.8 $26.5 2

TEXAS CONGESTION INDEX FOR THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH METROPOLITAN PLANNING AREA $ 19.7 Billion of transportation improvements included in the financiallyconstrained MTP 2.79 No-Build Scenario 1.29 2000 Level of Congestion (Baseline Condition) 1.56 Revenue-Constrained 1.51 MTP Improvements (Financially-Constrained Plan) 1.20 Eliminate LOS F Conditions (Target Level) * Uncongested * The TCI value of 1.51 for the MTP is considered conservative at this time, as the actual value is anticipated to be lower once the new Plan, Mobility 2030, Is adopted. The next Mobility Plan will contain new policy direction, the results of pending CDA s, and additional benefits resulting from the implementation of the full spectrum of new tools now available for expedited project delivery and funding.

TOTAL ADDITIONAL FUNDING NEEDS (Dallas-Fort Worth Region) 2006 TMMP Additional Cost to Eliminate Level-of-Service F Conditions Cost (Billions/2006$) $26.5 Cost to Purchase Right-of-Way $1.1 Cost to Rehabilitate Existing System $35.6 Goods Movement / Rail Freight (Trans Texas Corridor) $6.7 TOTAL ADDITIONAL NEEDS $69.9 1 1 Total Regional Needs: $69.9 billion plus $45.0 billion from MTP for grand total of $114.9 billion

REGIONAL CONGESTION LEVELS 1985 Annual Cost of Congestion $2.6 Billion 2005 Annual Cost Of Congestion $6.7 Billion Areas of Moderate Peak-Period Congestion Areas of Severe Peak-Period Congestion 2025 MTP 2030 TMMP Annual Cost of Congestion $11.5 Billion Mobility 2025: Amended April 2005 Texas Metropolitan Mobility Plan

IDENTIFIED FUNDING NEEDS DALLAS-FORT WORTH REGION Metropolitan Transportation System Components Funded Needs (Billions/2004 $) Unfunded Needs (Billions/2006 $) Operation & Maintenance $14.1 Congestion Mitigation Strategies $1.9 Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities and Transportation Enhancements $1.0 Rail and Bus Transit System $8.3 1 HOV and Managed Facilities $1.5 Freeway and Toll Road System $12.4 2 $20.6 3 Regional Arterial and Local Thoroughfare System $5.8 $5.9 Additional Cost to Purchase Right-of-Way $1.1 Rehabilitation Costs $35.6 Goods Movement/Rail Freight Costs (Trans Tx Corridor) $6.7 TOTAL $45.0 $69.9 $114.9 Billion 1 $2.0 billion obtained through Regional Transit Initiative 2 $0.8 billion to be obtained through future Partnership Programs 3 Includes Freeway-to-Freeway Interchanges

FUNDING SOURCES AND STRATEGIES TO BUILD MORE AS WELL AS FASTER SPEND WISER 1. Monitor project delivery 2. Streamline project development 3. Address management and operation solutions 4. Monitor benefit / cost ratios of projects BE MORE EFFICIENT 5. Support Comprehensive Development Agreements 6. Plan Managed Lanes 7. Create NTTA System Partnership BORROW TO BUILD 8. Use Toll Funds 9. Apply Shadow Tolls (Faster) 10. Apply Transportation Development Credits (toll credits) FIND PARTNERS 11. Coordinate Congressional Funding Roadway Earmarks New Rail Starts 12. Request TxDOT Category 12 Funds 13. Leverage Texas Mobility Funds 14. Coordinate Local Sources 15. Leverage State Rail Relocation Funds 16. Coordinate Trans Texas Corridor (TTC-35)