David A. Stroud, CFM AMEC Earth & Environmental Raleigh, NC

Similar documents
Outreach Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program. GAFM Technical Conference Flood Risk Outreach and Policy Session

FEMA FLOOD MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division March 6, 2018

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

Use of FEMA Non regulatory Flood Risk Products in Planning

Kentucky Risk MAP It s not Map Mod II

CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

FEMA s Flood Map Modernization Preparing for FY09 and Beyond: Integrated Flood Data Update, Risk Assessment, and Mitigation Planning

Flood Risk Products. New Techniques for Identifying and Communicating Flood Risk

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

State of South Carolina Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

New Tools for Mitigation & Outreach. Louie Greenwell Stantec

Flood Risk Resilience in Alabama: Challenges and Successes

SOUTH CENTRAL REGION MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN. Advisory Committee Meeting September 12, 2012

Welcome to a Silver Jackets Webinar

in coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department

Flood Hazard Risk Mapping:

Role of Disaster Insurance in Improving Resilience: An Expert Meeting The Resilient America Roundtable

Discovery Meeting: Middle Potomac- Catoctin Watershed. FEMA REGION III September 26, 2012 Rockville, MD and Fairfax, VA

RISK MANAGEMENT NEXT GENERATION

MUNICIPAL LAND USE STRATEGIES for Improving Flood Resilience

Village of Blue Mounds Annex

Flood Risk Review and Resilience Meeting: Allegheny County

G318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop. Module 2: Risk Assessment. Visual 2.0

ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND FLOOD MITIGATION

Community Rating System. National Flood Insurance Program

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION

County of Kaua'i Multi-Hazard Mitigation and Resilience Plan, 2015 Update

Location: Tampa, Florida March 6, 2013

Best Practices. for Incorporating Building Science Guidance into Community Risk MAP Implementation November 2012

3D Elevation Program (3DEP) Status and Plans. Kevin T. Gallagher Associate Director, Core Science Systems June 26, 2017

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program Risk MAP Plenary Session GAFM 2011

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

PUBLIC SURVEY FOR HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING

Q1 Do you...(check all that apply).

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

State of Vermont FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT WORK PLAN

Flood Insurance Coverage in Dare County: Before and After Hurricane Floyd

State of Missouri Five-Year Floodplain Management Plan

Georgia Silver Jackets Team

Vision to Action: Creating and Using a Flood Risk Assessment for Identifying Mitigation Options

T-318. Hazard Mitigation Section TDEM Recovery, Mitigation, and Standards

National Coastal Outreach

LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE CHECKLIST

Changes Coming to the National Flood Insurance Program What to Expect. Impact of changes to the NFIP under Section 205 of the Biggert-Waters Act

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

Stevens County, Washington Request for Proposal For A Countywide Multi-Jurisdictional All Hazard Mitigation Plan (Update)

Dade County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Coordinating CRS Success on a County Scale. Presented at the 41st Annual ASFPM Conference Managing Flood Risk in the Heartland

Findings/Debrief Meeting September 9, CDOT R4 Headquarters Big Thompson Conference Room W 10 th St. Greeley, CO 80634

Attachment B. King County Flood Control Zone District Work Program

Wyoming s Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

Strategies for Data Sharing

Flood Risk Review (FRR) Meeting. Cumberland County, Pennsylvania Carlisle, Pennsylvania December 5, 2016

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Are Risk MAP Products Really on Our Mind?

Public Meeting 28 November Presented by: Deepa Srinivasan, Vision Planning and Consulting, LLC Dr. Michael Scott, ESRGC, Salisbury University

Cumberland County, NJ. Risk MAP Project Status Update April 22, 2013

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

Hazard Mitigation & Resiliency

Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana Flood Insurance Study Update Risk Analysis March 3, Shona Gibson Project Monitor, FEMA Region VI

Flood Risk Outreach Tools for Georgia Communities. GAFM 10 th Annual Conference Presented By: Jarrett Mattli

Tangipahoa Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mitigation Steering Committee Kick-off Meeting. September 9, 2014 Hammond, LA

The National Flood Insurance Program and Flood Insurance Rate Map for San Francisco. Presentation at Treasure Island Community Meeting

Disaster Insurance: Are States and Insurance Companies Prepared?

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Mitigation Strategies

Community Resilience & NFIP s Community Rating system

Section 2. Introduction and Purpose of the LMS

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Community Rating System: A Comparative Analysis

Multi-Jurisdictional. Multnomah County. Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. Public Comment DRAFT Nov. 7, 2016

CITY OF VESTAVIA HILLS

Floodplain Management Plan

LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW WORKSHEET FEMA REGION 2 Jurisdiction: Jurisdiction: Title of Plan: Date of Plan: Address:

Alaska Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Community Incentives for Nature-Based Flood Solutions

Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain management plans and flood forecast inundation maps

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Durham County Preliminary Flood Hazard Data Public Meeting. July 28, 2016

Thurston County, WA Flood Hazard Mitigation Plan Annual Progress Report CRS Activity 510

Sea Level Rise and the NFIP

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

ASFPM RECOMMENDED TASK FORCE ACTIONS

King County Flood Control District 2015 Work Program

PHASE 2 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT

Section 19: Basin-Wide Mitigation Action Plans

February 18, 2005 NFIP-NCEM 5-Year CAP Plan, Sections I-III Page 1 of 6

Chapter 7 Appendix B: National Flood Insurance Program Summary for Kaua'i County, 2015 Update

CDBG-DR, BW-12, CRS and Dauphin County, PA: What do they have in common? 2015 FMA Annual Conference

Floodplain Management Plan State of Utah

Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012

Land Economics 94:2, May 2018 Flood Risk, Local Hazard Mitigation, and the Community Rating System of NFIP, by Jingyuan Li and Craig E.

Transcription:

David A. Stroud, CFM AMEC Earth & Environmental Raleigh, NC

Objectives Risk MAP background North Carolina s Risk MAP role Role of communication in Risk MAP Effective risk communication two examples Multi-hazard mitigation planning Outreach project strategy

Risk Map Understanding Risk is Critical to Risk Reduction Risk MAP Background Mapping Assessment Planning http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/fhm

Risk Map Vision Through collaboration with state, local and tribal entities, Risk MAP will deliver quality data that increases public awareness and leads to action that reduces risk to live and property

Risk MAP Life Cycle

Risk MAP Goals Implement a comprehensive national outreach strategy that provides stakeholders with targeted messaging Establish a baseline, and measure annually, of local understanding of risk Develop a process to conduct the risk assessment routinely and measure the reduction of current and future vulnerability

Risk MAP in North Carolina North Carolina is a national leader in Risk MAP FEMA grant for pilot study of 4 counties (Durham, Edgecombe, Macon and New Hanover) to expand ways to identify risk and add it to county and state mitigation planning Integrated Hazard Risk Management (IHRM)

Risk MAP in North Carolina North Carolina Risk MAP Pilot Project will: Expand the state s floodplain mapping database to include other hazards such as coastal erosion, landslides, tornados and wildfires

Risk MAP in North Carolina Floodplain Other Natural Hazards State Hazard Mitigation Plan & IHRM

Risk MAP in North Carolina North Carolina Risk MAP Pilot Project will: Gather building data (footprint, first-floor elevation, construction materials) to help community s identify the extent and probability of damage for any natural disaster

Risk MAP in North Carolina Construction make up is important Finished floor elevations are essential Building footprints are valuable

Risk MAP in North Carolina North Carolina Risk MAP Pilot Project will: Provide a digital platform and other tools to automatically generate risk assessment information that can be included in state and local hazard mitigation plans Planners and emergency managers can use these tools to communicate information about the probability and the potential consequences of natural disasters that might occur

How will Risk MAP enable communities to communicate risk more effectively?

Traditional floodplain mapping does not quantify the risk to people and property Risk MAP will combine risk assessments with updated flood studies (frequency, spatial extent, potential magnitude and significance) This will help to quantify the potential physical, social and economic losses from a natural disaster

Traditional floodplain mapping does not quantify the risk to people and property Risk MAP will help to identify gaps in data that will provide a more complete picture of the risks facing a community Provide a solid foundation for: Risk assessment floodplain management & Actuarial soundness of the NFIP

New Techniques Good Better In or out of floodplain Depth of flooding on your lot

New Techniques Three Dimensional Floodplain Even Better

New technology and tools are not enough by themselves The end users (states, communities and homeowners) must utilize this data, new technology and tools to reduce risk Wow, what does all of this mean????

How can communities effectively communicate risk to the public Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Process Involve a wide variety of stakeholders and citizens Make them members of the planning committee Legitimize the planning process by resolution from governing body

How can communities effectively communicate risk to the public Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Process Evaluate the difference between protecting people and property Short term evacuating residents and visitors Long term damage reduction (buildings in harms way) Consider areas in your community which should be off limits to development (keeping things from getting worse)

How can communities effectively communicate risk to the public Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Process Encourage media to be a part of the planning process Newspaper and television coverage Post planning process updates and draft plan on website Other community dissemination methods newsletters, utility bills, etc.

How can communities effectively communicate risk to the public CRS Outreach Project Strategy Strategic planning process that allows communities to evaluate how best to communicate risk to the public Committee must be established Committee is encourage to be creative and think outside the box Committee must evaluate whether the current outreach approach is working and how best to communicate risk to the public

How can communities effectively communicate risk to the public CRS Outreach Project Strategy Strategic planning process that allows communities to evaluate how best to communicate risk to the public Committee must describe the problem (flood hazard) Committee must set goals Committee must select outreach projects to effectively communicate risk Committee must describe the process that will be followed to monitor and evaluate the projects Committee must prepare a written document

How can communities effectively communicate risk to the public CRS Outreach Project Strategy Research indicates that successful communication should include: Multi-pronged approach to informing people Education based not fear based information Simple messages clear and direct Information that is localized What works best for your community

How can communities effectively communicate risk to the public Helpful hints: People should feel like they have a voice regarding hazards in their community If people feel that someone is listening to them, the more receptive they will be to hearing information from the community

How can communities effectively communicate risk to the public Helpful hints: Communication channels Press Releases Websites Committees Social media Listservs Community events Blogs

How can communities effectively communicate risk to the public Helpful hints: Who is your audience (unique opportunities) V-Zone residents Non-English speaking Contractors Tourists University students Children

How can communities effectively communicate risk to the public Helpful hints: Community self-assessment (how best to inform public) Natural hazards including floodplain functions and resources How to protect people from the hazards How to protect property from the hazards How to insure for the hazards How to keep things from getting worse (floodplain development permits, maintaining the drainage system, respecting watershed functions and resources)

How can communities effectively communicate risk to the public Helpful hints: Limited resources (staff and budget) Public-private partnerships Leveraging money, time, expertise and staff Major businesses Universities Libraries Civic Organizations

Risk MAP Goals Implement a comprehensive national outreach strategy that provides stakeholders with targeted messaging Establish a baseline, and measure annually, of local understanding of risk Develop a process to conduct the risk assessment routinely and measure the reduction of current and future vulnerability