Leveraging HAZUS for Risk Assessment Analysis within Risk MAP

Similar documents
Flood Risk Assessment in the

Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

New Tools for Mitigation & Outreach. Louie Greenwell Stantec

Kentucky Risk MAP It s not Map Mod II

Discovery Meeting: Middle Potomac- Catoctin Watershed. FEMA REGION III September 26, 2012 Rockville, MD and Fairfax, VA

Delaware Bay / River Coastal Flood Risk Study. FEMA REGION II and III September 19, 2012

Use of FEMA Non regulatory Flood Risk Products in Planning

Integrating Hazus into the Flood Risk Assessment

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

Vision to Action: Creating and Using a Flood Risk Assessment for Identifying Mitigation Options

Overview of Capabilities and Current Limitations

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Chemung HUC-8 Watershed Project. February 1, 2011

Flood Risk Products. New Techniques for Identifying and Communicating Flood Risk

Comparing HAZUS Flood Loss Estimates Across Hazard Identification Methods and Building Stock Inventory Data. Albion Township Dane County, Wisconsin

Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program Risk MAP Plenary Session GAFM 2011

Mapping Flood Risk in the Upper Fox River Basin:

Best Practices. for Incorporating Building Science Guidance into Community Risk MAP Implementation November 2012

Risk Assessment Training Cape May County, NJ. FEMA REGION II December 13, :00 pm

FEMA s Flood Map Modernization Preparing for FY09 and Beyond: Integrated Flood Data Update, Risk Assessment, and Mitigation Planning

Modernization, FEMA is Recognizing the connection between damage reduction and

Flood Risk Review (FRR) Meeting. Cumberland County, Pennsylvania Carlisle, Pennsylvania December 5, 2016

Region VIII Applications of Nationwide HAZUS Flood and Earthquake Modeling-Multi

Emergency Management. December 16, 2010

Hazard Mitigation Grants. Technical Assistance Session Middlesex County, NJ December 7, 2011

Updated Total Exposure in Floodplain (TEIF) Method. Cynthia McCoy, FEMA Region X James Mawby, RAMPP (Dewberry)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Planning in Water s Way: Flood Resilient Economic Development Strategy for the I-86 Innovation Corridor

Location: Tampa, Florida March 6, 2013

Flood Hazard Risk Mapping:

Cumberland County, NJ. Risk MAP Project Status Update April 22, 2013

SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT 156

Now You re Cooking! Recipes for Resilience. Jerri Daniels, Dewberry Diane Howe, FEMA Region 6

Increasing Risk Communication for Property Owners with Risk NJAFM Conference Atlantic City, NJ

Not Your Average Risk Assessment: Multi-Stage Risk Assessments for Sites in the Passaic River Basin Stuart Geiger, CFM Joseph Ruggeri, PE, CFM

Georgia Silver Jackets Team

RISK MANAGEMENT NEXT GENERATION

3DEP Coalition Meeting. Kevin T. Gallagher Associate Director, Core Science Systems November 10, 2016

Federal Flood Risk Management Standards. An Update on Federal Flood Resilience Standards

Overview of HAZUS. December 6, 2011

Risk Assessment Training Union County, NJ. FEMA REGION II February 17, :00 am

NFIP Program Basics. KAMM Regional Training

CNMS and FOA: A Year in Review. Rick Sacbibit, P.E. Andy Read, CFM FEMA HQ, Risk Analysis Division June 4, 2015

FLOOD STUDY Atlantic County, NJ. FEMA REGION II July 12, :00

National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group Call

National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group Call

Flood Risk in the Schuylkill Watershed. Planning for Resilient Communities

BUTTS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana Flood Insurance Study Update Risk Analysis March 3, Shona Gibson Project Monitor, FEMA Region VI

Discovery Report. Cache River Watershed, Alexander, Johnson, Pulaski, and Union Counties, Illinois

G318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop. Module 2: Risk Assessment. Visual 2.0

David A. Stroud, CFM AMEC Earth & Environmental Raleigh, NC

Using Non-Regulatory RiskMAP Products in Floodplain Management. Ferrin Affleck, PE, CFM, Water Resources Engineer Project Manager Atkins

City of Pensacola and Escambia County Flood Risk and Flood Insurance Study

Association of State FloodPlain Managers 2809 Fish Hatchery Road, Madison, WI Phone: Fax:

Southwest Florida Discovery Kick-Off Meeting. February 4, 2014

Tarrant County, TX Monthly Progress Report No. 33 (FEMA Contract No, HSFEHQ-09-D-0369) Task Order 01

Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program

Survey of Hazus-MH: FEMA s Tool for Natural Hazard Loss Estimation

Planning for SLR Resiliency in Virginia Beach

United States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Requesters. December 2010 FEMA FLOOD MAPS

Findings/Debrief Meeting September 9, CDOT R4 Headquarters Big Thompson Conference Room W 10 th St. Greeley, CO 80634

Are Risk MAP Products Really on Our Mind?

GIS - Introduction and Sample Uses

Lake County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Plan Lake County Hazard Mitigation Committee

FLOOD INUNDATION MAPPING SCIENCE. Gardner Bent, U.S. Geological Survey, New England Water Science Center

Sea Level Rise and the NFIP

Requirements for Mapping Levees Complying with Section of the NFIP Regulations

Outreach Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program. GAFM Technical Conference Flood Risk Outreach and Policy Session

NFIP Mapping Issues. Wendy Lathrop, PLS, CFM. Cadastral Consulting, LLC

Flood Hazards and Flood Risk, the Impact of a Changing Climate

CRISP COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Suwannee River Water Management District

In 1993, spring came in like a lion, but refused

Flood Solutions. Summer 2018

Orange County Flood Insurance Study Update

WASHINGTON COUNTY, KENTUCKY AND INCORPORATED AREAS

LIFE SAFETY HAZARD INDICATOR

Westfield Boulevard Alternative

National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group Call. December 19, :00 AM EST

Table 1: Federal, State and Local Government Rules applicable to LOMRs/CLOMRS submittal

DuPage County East Branch DuPage River Resiliency Project. Benefit Cost Analysis

The National Flood Insurance Program and Flood Insurance Rate Map for San Francisco. Presentation at Treasure Island Community Meeting

Upper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction

Calhoun County Flood Insurance Study Update

Flood Risk Review and Resilience Meeting: Allegheny County

RichSmith_slate-FEMA_320x240.wmv.

Overview of HAZUS for Earthquake Loss Estimation. September 6, 2012

SECTION Watershed Informed Approach to FY 2016 Budget Development

FEMA s Flood Mapping Program

GIS - Introduction and Sample Uses

Pricing storm surge risks in Florida: Implications for determining flood insurance premiums and evaluating mitigation measures

Cameron County, TX. Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting. Please sign in (sheet at front of the room) Meeting will begin at 9:00

THE ECONOMIC ARGUMENT FOR AMPHIBIOUS RETROFIT CONSTRUCTION

in coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Tsunami Risk Assessment Tsunami Hazard Overview... 16

Updates to Maine Coastal Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM s): What a Local Official Should Know. Presented by: Steve Johnson, P.E.

Preface UPPER SPOKANE WATERSHED RISK REPORT KOOTENAI COUNTY, IDAHO

Flood Risk Resilience in Alabama: Challenges and Successes

Transcription:

Leveraging HAZUS for Risk Assessment Analysis within Risk MAP Jen Meyer - FEMA Region X Shane Parson - RAMPP PTS Team (URS Corp.) 2010 HAZUS Conference - August 2010

The Paradigm Shift: Map Mod to Risk MAP 2

Program Goals and Measures Risk MAP Goals Risk MAP Measures Goal 1: Data Gaps Address gaps in flood hazard data Goal 2: Awareness & Understanding Measurable increase of public awareness & understanding Goal 3: Mitigation Planning Lead effective engagement in Mitigation Planning Goal 4: Digital Platform Provide an enhanced digital platform Goal 5: Synergize Programs Align Risk Analysis programs and develop synergies Ensure 80 percent of the Nation s flood hazards are current by 2014 the flood hazard data are new, have been updated, or deemed still valid through Risk MAP review and update process Increase State, local, and Tribal officials level of understanding of flood risk Ensure 80 percent of the U.S. population (excluding territories) is covered by a Local or Tribal hazard mitigation plan that is approved or approvable pending adoption Percent of Local hazard mitigation plans approved using quality Risk MAP data or better Establish a culture of continuous improvement and executing projects aimed at reducing process cycle time and improving the quality of Risk MAP products and services 3 3

Program Product Comparisons Traditional Regulatory Products Non-Regulatory Products DFIRM Database Traditional products are regulatory and subject to statutory due-process requirements Risk MAP products are nonregulatory and are not subject to statutory due-process requirements 4

Flood Risk Products and Data Model Flood Risk Database Flood Risk Assessment Data Flood Depth & Analysis Grids Changes Since Last FIRM Data Areas of Mitigation Interest Flood Risk Map Flood Risk Report Ad-Hoc Flood Risk Analyses 5

Base vs. Enhanced Explained Flood Risk Datasets Base Flood Risk Datasets Changes Since Last FIRM Depth and Analysis Grids Flood Risk Assessments Enhanced Flood Risk Datasets Areas of Mitigation Interest Others Flood Risk Products Flood Risk Database Flood Risk Report Flood Risk Map 6

Flood Risk Database (red = enhanced) Changes Since Last FIRM Horizontal Changes and Results Vertical Changes by WSE Increments Depth & Analysis Grids Depth (10, 04, 02, 01, 0.2 percent chance) Percent Annual Chance Percent 30-Year Grid Water Surface Elevation (multi-freq) Velocity Grids, Annualized Depth, Top and Toe of Levee Multi Freq Grids for Levee and Coastal Areas, etc. Flood Risk Assessment Average Annualized Loss 2010 Refined Flood Risk Assessment HAZUS or Non-HAZUS with improved data/assumptions Areas of Mitigation Interest Areas of Mitigation Opportunity or Awareness 7

Flood Depth Grids (Depth_XXpct) Base Datasets Riverine: 10%, 4%, 2%, 1%, & 0.2% Annual Chance (A.C.) Floods Coastal: 1% A.C. Flood Levee: 1% A.C. Flood Enhanced Datasets Riverine, Coastal, and Levee: Any depth grid associated to a flood frequency other than those listed above as Base Datasets (e.g. the 2% Coastal depth grid, the 0.5% Riverine depth grid, etc.) 8

Flood Risk Report 9

Flood Risk Map (accompanies and is a subset of the Flood Risk Report) 10

Flood Risk Assessment Dataset Base Flood Risk Datasets Changes Since Last FIRM Depth and Analysis Grids Flood Risk Assessments Enhanced Flood Risk Datasets Areas of Mitigation Interest Others Flood Risk Products Flood Risk Database Flood Risk Report Flood Risk Map 11

Flood Risk Assessment Flood Risk Assessment Data 2010 HAZUS Average Annualized Loss (AAL) Study Refined HAZUS and Other Risk Analyses Other Risk Analysis HAZUS MH Flood Risk Assessment 12

Purpose and Intended Uses Identify Areas with Higher Relative Flood Risk: Floodprone Areas Vulnerable people and property Provide Flood Risk $: Potential damage severity for different flood frequencies Identify locations with possible cost effective mitigation options Improve on Existing Flood Risk Estimates: What was determined during the 2010 Average Annualized Loss Study? What can be improved during a new flood study? 13

Flood Risk Assessment Outputs Populate Flood Risk Database with Flood Risk Assessment Results (at census block level) 2010 AAL Results Refined Analysis Results Composite Results Use results for Flood Risk Report Flood Risk Map 14

2010 AAL HAZUS Study 2010 HAZUS-MH Flood Average Annualized Loss Estimation (AAL) was performed for continental U.S. using MR4 Inputs: County-wide study regions 30 meter DEM Default Census data Final Output included Total exposure Average Annualized Loss Annualized Loss Ratio High Low 15

AAL Usability for Risk MAP Initial study focused on providing state and watershed based results As Risk MAP looks to use more detailed results (census block level), a AAL Usability Analysis is underway to better understand its limitations and refine AAL results as appropriate. 16

AAL Content Scalability Base 2010 AAL Data will be exported to Flood Risk Database for the extent of the study area (at census block) Includes 10%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%, and 0.2% annual chance events and Annualized Loss Data will also be used as one of the elements for study prioritization efforts in future FYs Enhancements HAZUS export files (*.hpr) from AAL study will be available after AAL Usability Study for additional data extraction 17

Refined HAZUS Analysis Overview: Depth Grids imported into HAZUS Base: For new study areas HAZUS run for each return period and annualized HAZUS results exported and stored in Flood Risk Database 18

Import Depth Grids Depth grids imported for each return period 19

Selecting Depth Grids for Analysis Select exported depth grids for a new scenario For MR4, run each return period separately Future MR5/6 HAZUS releases will allow annualized with user defined depth grids 20

Running Scenario Hydrology, Hydraulics, and Annualized Losses are calculated for the new scenario using the imported depth grids 21

Estimation of Losses Dollar Losses Residential Loss Commercial Loss Other Asset Loss Percent Damage Evaluates Building Stock Structure and Content Considerations Business Disruption Considers Total Occupancy Tables Considers Lost Income and Wages 22

Content Scalability Base HAZUS analysis for reaches with new or updated studies where depth grids can be generated Should include 10%, 4%, 2%, 1%, and 0.2% annual chance events and Annualized Loss HAZUS GBS Losses Enhancements Additional events Additional HAZUS loss calculations (infrastructure, critical facilities, userdefined facilities) Use of local data to updated/supplement HAZUS data Non-HAZUS analysis methods (needs to provide same base loss estimates) 23

Flood Risk Report Flood Risk Report Tables - Based on composite of AAL and Refined HAZUS Flood Risk Assessment Watershed USA s flood risk assessment incorporates results from recently performed HAZUS-MH Level 1 and 2 analyses taken from local hazard mitigation plans. FEMA updated these analyses to account for newly modeled areas throughout the watershed and more detailed building locations and values provided by the local governments. The highest areas of flood risk were concentrated in the City of Floodville as well as unincorporated portions of the watershed along Indian Creek. This area accounts for nearly 70% of the watershed s total estimated flood risk and should be evaluated for immediate risk reduction activities 24

Flood Risk Map 25

26