Intellectual property rights intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in Belgium

Similar documents
Intellectual property rights intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in Luxembourg

IPR-intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in the European Union

IPR-intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in the European Union

Making Intellectual Property Rights work at work. European Legal Framework. Prof. Marie-Christine Janssens Centre for IT & IP Law (CiTiP)

PRIVATE COSTS OF ENFORCEMENT OF IPR

Belgian R&D tax incentives

Thailand and TPP 30 November 2012 Apiradi Tantraporn, Executive Chairperson The International Institute for Asia Pacific Studies (INSAPS), Bangkok

Intellectual Property-Related Preferential Trade Agreements and the Composition of Trade

Technology Transfers in Europe

FESI COMMENTS ON BREXIT

Intellectual property rights-intensive industries and economic performance in Norway

BREXIT INTA Position on Intellectual Property Rights Issues October 2017

EU-INDIA TRADE & INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (TIDP)

JOINT STATEMENT REGARDING THE NEGOTIATIONS CONCERNING THE EXIT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM PARTICULARLY WITH REGARD TO TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS

THE TRIPS AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. Jayashree Watal

Employment Contract in MSCA

Discussion of The Effect of Intellectual Property Boxes on Innovative Activity & Tax Avoidance. Kaishu Wu University of Oregon

PATSTRAT. Error! Unknown document property name. EN

Questionnaire. On the patent system in Europe

LUXEMBOURG IP TAX REGIME

The economic contribution

Presented by Brian Ledgerwood Senior International Trade Specialist Office of Materials Industries U.S. Department of Commerce

11TH BEST PRACTICE IN CITIZENS PARTICIPATION Award

Presented by Bob Sacco, GTA Trade & Customs Leader

Is it time for your country to consider the "patent box"?

GIES 2008: Measuring Innovation

ANNEX ONE SINGAPORE 1. INTRODUCTION

Univerza v Ljubljani. University office for research, development and intellectual property Intellectual property rules at UL. Jasna Donko Lesjak

Cost & Payments: Two Peculiarities of US Healthcare Spending

The Interface between IP Law and Competition Law

CHAPTER 1 OBJECTIVES AND GENERAL DEFINITIONS ARTICLE 1.1. Objective

Source: OECD, Note: 2006 for Finland, United States, Canada and Ireland; 2004 for Switzerland, Netherlands, Australia, Italy and Turkey.

Access to medicines and Intellectual Property Provisions in Free Trade and Economic Partnership Agreements

IPRs' Protection in Greece

The Economics of Innovation

TAXATION OF KNOWLEDGE-BASED CAPITAL: SOME ADDITIONAL ISSUES FOR POLICYMAKERS CONSIDERATION

IP valuation, exploitation and finance

20 years of TRIPS Disputes

The Effect of Intellectual Property Boxes on Innovative Activity & Tax Avoidance University of Illinois Tax Doctoral Consortium III

Draft. LightingEurope Position on the EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)

20 Intellectual Property as Securitized Assets

Software and innovation deduction: Belgium is the place to be! 23 November 2017

Worcestershire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust. Intellectual Property & Property Rights Policy.

Cyprus: A dynamic business and investment centre

Japan and EU announce Agreement in Principle on Economic Partnership Agreement

EU and WTO/TRIPS & FTAs: Hard Standards and Flexibilities

The Innovation Promotion Act of 2015: Not the New Ireland

Our position. Towards a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between the EU and Indonesia

OPC FOUNDATION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POLICY VERSION APR 2018

2015 Situation Report on Counterfeiting in the European Union

The Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)

Measuring the impacts

MACRO-LEVEL ANALYSIS EU Russia

ECTA POSITION PAPER ON THE DEPENDENCY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE MARKS ON A NATIONAL BASIC APPLICATION OR REGISTRATION (MADRID SYSTEM)

Innovation, Intellectual property and Financing

Intellectual property rights in Luxembourg (IPR): tax exemption

Intellectual Property Box Regimes

Economic substance requirements in Jersey. October 2018

moscow office Latitude n 55 45' 2.99" Longitude E "

Patent Box Tax Relief. Pay tax at just 10%

Canada s Accession to the Hague Agreement

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY DATA CLASSIFICATION POLICY

C O N S U L T A N C Y A G E N C Y L A W F I R M

Materiality of Intangible Assets in Business Companies in the Czech Republic

The template on the O-SII and G-SII buffer 1

IPR Handling at a (mainly) Publicly Funded Institution in Switzerland

Raising Capital Through IP. WIPO-WASME Special Program on Practical IPRs Issues - Geneva, May 3 to 6, 2004

II Copyright and related rights 36. contents

3. Natalia MYKOLSKA Deputy Minister of Economic Development and Trade of

Ireland as a platform into Europe. The Irish Legal Environment

Innovation through the tax system: what is the role of tax incentives?

INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY RIGHTS INDEX

Considerations in the Valuation of Royalties and Licensing Agreements

Deal or No deal: IP. IP if there is a deal

ARTICLE I (Scope of Collaboration)

BERMUDA ECONOMIC SUBSTANCE AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 2019 BR 34 / 2019

10 Steps to realising real cash value from Innovation and IC Assets. Ludo Pyis Areopa

11th Meeting of the Advisory Expert Group on National Accounts, 5-7 December 2017, New York, USA

IP rights post-brexit

Alter Domus BELGIUM WE RE WHERE YOU NEED US.

Co-operation in IPR: Perspectives from ASEAN

EU-Ukraine Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Dialogue 2017

PATSTRAT. Error! Unknown document property name. EN

Processing of this next lot of wafers remains on track and results from their analysis will be available in Q2 2019, as previously reported.

Prof. Gordana Djurovic, PhD. University of Montenegro, Faculty of Economics

COMMISSION DECISION. of

FOREIGN INVESTMENT LAW

BERMUDA ECONOMIC SUBSTANCE REGULATIONS 2018 BR 154 / 2018

Tax newsletter. VMB Accountants & Tax Consultants 12 July 2012

Israel through the Global Crisis: Do Innovations Help?

Chapter 4. Economic Growth

Taxes and the co-location of intangibles and tangibles

Moving to a (Properly Designed) Territorial System of Taxation Will Make America s Tax System Internationally Competitive

1. Corporate Income Tax

Blockchain certificates for intellectual property management. Nürnberg, 5 December 2017

The template on the O-SII and G-SII buffer 1

VALUATION PROPERTY RIGHTS

WIPO Coordination Committee

Inside the (Patent) Box: UK Government introduces beneficial tax regime on patent income

Realising the European Research Area (ERA) Key challenges. European Commission Research Directorate-General Robert-Jan Smits

Transcription:

Intellectual property rights intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in Belgium A joint project between the European Patent Office and the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market September 2013

Intellectual property rights intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in Industries to Employment in 25% The study, carried out jointly by the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market and the European Patent Office, aims to provide the first broad, credible assessment of the combined contribution of industries that make intensive use of the various types of intellectual property rights (IPR) to the economies of the EU as a whole and to the individual Member States. The study covers a broad range of IP rights trade marks, patents, designs, copyright and geographical indications (GIs) and considers a variety of economic indicators, in particular gross domestic product (GDP) and employment. It is designed to provide evidence that can be used by policymakers in their work, and to serve as a basis for raising awareness of intellectual property among Europe s citizens. The complete report can be viewed here. IPR-intensive industries are defined as those having above-average use of IPR per employee. According to the study, 25% of all jobs and 37.6% of GDP in Belgium are generated by IPR-intensive industries. Industries to GDP in 37.6% employment GDP

Industries to Employment in During the period 2008-2010, 20% of jobs in Belgium were generated by trade mark-intensive industries, 10.7% by design-intensive industries, 10.2% by patentintensive industries, and 3.4% in copyright-intensive industries. TOTAL JOBS 4,465,667 25% 1,117,041 20% 891,259 10.7% 479,883 10.2% 453,323 3.4% 149,798 <0.1% 114 EU LEVEL

Industries to GDP in Over the same period of 2008-2010 in Belgium, trade mark-intensive industries accounted for over 33% of GDP, both design-intensive industries for over 10%, patent-intensive industries for 11.6%, and copyright and GI-intensive industries for smaller proportions. It is important to bear in mind that the shares in GDP and employment shown in this report do not necessarily reflect the degree to which a country s economy is innovative. In the Internal Market, companies may have their headquarters in one country, create their IPR in another country and manufacture the resulting products in yet another. Following figures illustrate the origins of IPRs in respect to Belgium. TOTAL ECONOMY ( MILLIONS) 356,069 EU LEVEL 37.6% 133,836 ( millions) 33.3% 118,705 10.2% 36,430 11.6% 41,456 4.0% 14,267 <0.1% 8

IP rights originating in Belgium (all industries), 2004-2008 2.13 The figure shows the number of patents, trade marks and designs per 1,000 employees in Belgium and the whole EU. This is the measure of IPR intensity which has been employed throughout this report. It should be noted that in order to provide a complete picture of the IPR-generating activities in Belgium, successful filings (that is, filings that resulted in rights granted) from companies in all industries are included. Based on this figure it is possible to observe that Belgium has above average patents granted per 1,000 employees in comparison to the EU27, and below average trade marks and designs. 0.45 0.17 1.75 0.95 Belgium Jobs in IPR-intensive industries created by domestic and foreign companies The total employment in IPR-intensive industries corresponds to 1,117,041 jobs in Belgium. Approximately 5 million IPR-intensive jobs are created in EU Member States by companies originating from other Member States. Belgian companies create 160,444 jobs in other Member States, or 3.1% of the total.