Basic Economic Security in the United States: How Much Income Do Working Adults Need in Each State?

Similar documents
Basic Economic Security in Texas: How Much Income Do Working Adults Need?

State Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/Credits, 2011

Income from U.S. Government Obligations

Annual Costs Cost of Care. Home Health Care

Checkpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources

State Income Tax Tables

Kentucky , ,349 55,446 95,337 91,006 2,427 1, ,349, ,306,236 5,176,360 2,867,000 1,462

EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation

Union Members in New York and New Jersey 2018

Undocumented Immigrants are:

Pay Frequency and Final Pay Provisions

The Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue

AIG Benefit Solutions Producer Licensing and Appointment Requirements by State

Federal Rates and Limits

Sales Tax Return Filing Thresholds by State

MEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS

State Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply

Termination Final Pay Requirements

Residual Income Requirements

By: Adelle Simmons and Laura Skopec ASPE

Nation s Uninsured Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016

The Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects of Recent Regulation of Debit Card Interchange Fees. Robert J. Shapiro

MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN HAWAII 2013

Impacts of Prepayment Penalties and Balloon Loans on Foreclosure Starts, in Selected States: Supplemental Tables

Key Facts: NATIONAL WOMEN S LAW CENTER FACT SHEET JAN 2018

Motor Vehicle Sales/Use, Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart-2005

MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN TEXAS 2016

Tassistance program. In fiscal year 1998, it represented 18.2 percent of all food stamp

Health Insurance Coverage among Puerto Ricans in the U.S.,

Q Homeowner Confidence Survey Results. May 20, 2010

Tassistance program. In fiscal year 1999, it 20.1 percent of all food stamp households. Over

Federal Registry. NMLS Federal Registry Quarterly Report Quarter I

Overview of Sales Tax Exemptions for Agricultural Producers in the United States

ATHENE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities

Fingerprint, Biographical Affidavit and Third-Party Verification Reports Requirements

Ability-to-Repay Statutes

PAY STATEMENT REQUIREMENTS

Understanding Oregon s Throwback Rule for Apportioning Corporate Income

Mapping the geography of retirement savings

Child Care Assistance Spending and Participation in 2016

Forecasting State and Local Government Spending: Model Re-estimation. January Equation

2012 RUN Powered by ADP Tax Changes

The table below reflects state minimum wages in effect for 2014, as well as future increases. State Wage Tied to Federal Minimum Wage *

NOTICE TO MEMBERS CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CORPORATION CANADIENNE DE. Trading by U.S. Residents

Population in the U.S. Floodplains

Q309 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of September 30, 2009

Q209 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of June 30, 2009

Aiming. Higher. Results from a Scorecard on State Health System Performance 2015 Edition. Douglas McCarthy, David C. Radley, and Susan L.

DATA AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

Fingerprint and Biographical Affidavit Requirements

Recourse for Employees Misclassified as Independent Contractors Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO

Required Training Completion Date. Asset Protection Reciprocity

How Much Would a State Earned Income Tax Credit Cost in Fiscal Year 2018?

Issue Brief No Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2005 Current Population Survey

DFA INVESTMENT DIMENSIONS GROUP INC. DIMENSIONAL INVESTMENT GROUP INC. Institutional Class Shares January 2018

TA X FACTS NORTHERN FUNDS 2O17

Put in place to assist the unemployed or underemployed.

Media Alert. First American CoreLogic Releases Q3 Negative Equity Data

FAPRI Analysis of Dairy Policy Options for the 2002 Farm Bill Conference

IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION

STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES

State Social Security Income Pension Income State computation not based on federal. Social Security benefits excluded from taxable income.

State Tax Treatment of Social Security, Pension Income

REPORT THE IMPACT OF THE OBAMA ECONOMIC PLAN FOR AMERICA S WORKING WOMEN

2014 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES HR COMPLIANCE CENTER

Medicaid & CHIP: December 2014 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment Report February 23, 2015

White Paper 2018 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES

Aetna Individual Direct Pay Commissions Schedule

Chapter D State and Local Governments

State Minimum Wage Chart (See below for Local/City Minimum Wage Chart)

J.P. Morgan Funds 2018 Distribution Notice

# of Credit Unions As of March 31, 2011

FHA Manual Underwriting Exceeding 31% / 43% DTI Eligibility Quick Reference

Tax Recommendations and Actions in Other States. Joel Michael House Research Department June 9, 2011

A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency. (hours ethics included)

8, ADP,

Estimating the Number of People in Poverty for the Program Access Index: The American Community Survey vs. the Current Population Survey.

The 2017 CHP Salary Survey

STATE MINIMUM WAGES 2017 MINIMUM WAGE BY STATE

Table 1: Medicaid and CHIP: March and April 2017 Preliminary Monthly Enrollment

Budget Uncertainty in Medicaid. Federal Funds Information for States

Providing Subprime Consumers with Access to Credit: Helpful or Harmful? James R. Barth Auburn University

Table 1: Medicaid and CHIP: December 2016 and January 2017 Preliminary Monthly Enrollment

SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF THE SENATE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE NUTRITION TITLE By Dorothy Rosenbaum and Stacy Dean

Mutual Fund Tax Information

Table 1: Medicaid and CHIP: June and July 2017 Preliminary Monthly Enrollment

Consumer Installment Loan Regulations - State

# of Credit Unions As of September 30, 2011

Medicaid & CHIP: October 2014 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment Report December 18, 2014

Fiscal Policy Project

Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curve

Minimum Wage Laws in the States - April 3, 2006

What is your New Financing Statement Fee? What is your Amendment Fee (include termination fee if a different amount)?

Account-based medical plans Summary of Benefits and Coverage supplement

TANF FUNDS MAY BE USED TO CREATE OR EXPAND REFUNDABLE STATE CHILD CARE TAX CREDITS

S T A T E INSURANCE COVERAGE AND PRACTICE SYMPOSIUM DECEMBER 7 8, 2017 NEW YORK, NY. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency

Employer-Funded Individual Health Insurance

State-Level Trends in Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance

Medicaid & CHIP: March 2015 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment Report June 4, 2015

S T A T E TURNING THE TABLES ON PLAINTIFFS IN TRUCKING LITIGATION APRIL 26 27, 2018 CHICAGO, IL. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency

Transcription:

IWPR R590 October 2018 Basic Economic Security in the United States: How Much Income Do Working Adults Need in Each State? Economic security is a critical part of the overall health and well-being of women, men, and children. To experience economic security, working adults must have enough income to meet their basic monthly expenses such as housing, food, transportation, and child care expenses and save for emergencies and retirement. The Basic Economic Security Tables (BEST) Index provides a measure of how much income working adults of different family types need to be economically secure in each state. 1 This fact sheet presents new national and state-level BEST data calculated by the Institute for Women s Policy Research. BEST data for many more family types than shown here are available at http://www.basiceconomicsecurity.org/. Economic Security Snapshot: United States Only 67 percent of working adults (aged 19 64) in the United States are economically secure, meaning their family household income is enough to meet monthly basic expenses and reach modest asset development goals (Table 1). Working men are more likely to be economically secure than working women (68.2 percent of men are economically secure, compared with 65.5 percent of women). White men are the most likely to live with economic security in the United States, and Hispanic men and women are least likely to live with economic security. Just under one in four households headed by single mothers in the United States are economically secure and live with family incomes above the BEST Index for their family type. Families headed by single mothers are the least likely to be economically secure, while married couples without children are the most likely to be economically secure. Amount of annual income working adults with employment benefits need for basic economic security in the United States A single working adult A single parent with 1 infant 2 working adults with 1 infant, 1 preschooler $33,012 $50,916 $79,224

Table 1 shows how much income working adults both with and without employment-based benefits in the United States need for basic economic security. A single working adult needs $2,751 per month, or $33,012 per year, to be economically secure. A single working parent with one infant needs $4,243 per month, or $50,916 per year, for their family to be economically secure. A family with two working parents, one infant, and one preschooler needs a monthly income of $3,301 per worker (or, $6,602 per couple), or nearly $80,000 per year, to experience basic economic security. The BEST Index shows that living above the federal poverty threshold is not necessarily enough for basic economic security. In 2017, the federal poverty line for a single adult under age 65 was $12,752 and $16,895 for a household with one adult and one child under age 18. 2 Working adults without employment-based benefits need more income to have basic economic security. Without benefits, workers need to pay for health insurance and save for retirement on their own (Table 1). 3 Table 1. The Basic Economic Security Tables for the United States, 2018 Workers with Benefits Workers without Benefits Monthly Expenses 2 Workers 2 Workers 1 Worker Infant 1 Worker Infant 1 Worker Infant Preschooler 1 Worker Infant Preschooler Housing & Utilities $785 $895 $895 $785 $895 $895 Food $267 $381 $702 $267 $381 $702 Transportation $476 $520 $985 $476 $520 $985 Child Care $0 $667 $1,435 $0 $667 $1,435 Personal & Household Items $389 $472 $591 $389 $472 $591 Healthcare $177 $373 $596 $315 $485 $806 Emergency Savings $102 $174 $246 $111 $188 $260 Retirement Savings $72 $72 $70 $121 $121 $117 Taxes $483 $782 $1,259 $516 $807 $1,349 Tax Credits $0 -$93 -$177 $0 -$92 -$177 Monthly Total (per worker) $2,751 $4,243 $3,301 $2,980 $4,444 $3,481 Annual Total $33,012 $50,916 $79,224 $35,760 $53,328 $83,544 Hourly Wage (per worker) $15.63 $24.11 $18.76 $16.93 $25.25 $19.78 Additional Asset Building Savings Children's Education and Training $0 $100 $201 $0 $100 $201 Homeownership $123 $144 $144 $123 $144 $144 Notes: Benefits include employment-based health insurance and retirement plans. Infants are aged 0 12 months and preschool children are 13 48 months. Hourly wages are for 176 hours per month. Source: IWPR compilation of data from the Basic Economic Security Tables available at www.basiceconomicsecurity.org. 2

Basic Economic Security by Race and Ethnicity Figure 1. Working Women and People of Color are Less Likely to Have Basic Economic Security Percent of Working Adults Living with Economic Security by Gender and Race/Ethnicity, United States, 2016 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 73.3% 76.0% 50.2% 59.8% 44.8% 44.4% 68.1% 69.1% 59.0% 63.6% 65.5% 68.2% 0% White Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander Other Race/Ethnicity Total Women Men Notes: Includes working adults aged 19-64. Racial groups are non-hispanic. Sources: IWPR analysis of five years (2012 2016) of data from American Community Survey (Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Version 7.0) and the Basic Economic Security Tables Index. White men are the most likely to live with economic security in the United States. Among working women from the racial and ethnic groups shown in Figure 1, White women are the most likely to live with economic security (73 percent; Figure 1). Hispanic men and women are the least likely to have economic security (44 percent and 45 percent, respectively). Among working women, White women are the most likely to live with economic security (73 percent), while Hispanic women are the least likely (45 percent). Among working Black women, 50 percent experience economic security, which is substantially lower than the rate among working Black men, at nearly 60 percent (Figure 1). 3

Basic Economic Security by Family Type Figure 2. Families with Single Working Mothers are the Least Likely Family Household Type to Have Economic Security Percent of Households with Economic Security by Household Type, United States, 2016 90% 83.3% 80% 70% 60% 57.6% 61.8% 64.0% 50% 46.1% 40% 30% 23.8% 20% 10% 0% Single Mother Single Father Single woman, no children Couple with children Single man, no children Couple, no children Notes: Children are aged under 19 and the number of children are capped at 6 to make it comparable to the BEST indices. Married couples include cohabiting partners. Sources: IWPR analysis of five years (2012 2016) of data from American Community Survey (Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Version 7.0) and the Basic Economic Security Tables Index. Just under one in four households headed by single mothers in the United States are economically secure and live with family incomes above the BEST Index for their family type (Figure 2). Households headed by single fathers are nearly twice as likely to have incomes that provide economic security. New York has the lowest rate of single mothers with economic security at 17 percent. New Hampshire has the highest share of single mothers experiencing economic security, but rates are still relatively low, with just one in three families headed by a single mother experiencing economic security. (Data not shown.) Married couples without children are the most likely to be economically secure in every state. Eighty-three percent have incomes above the BEST Index economic security threshold for their household type. 4

Basic Economic Security by State The share of working adults who are economically secure varies widely by state. Best States for Economic Security: New Hampshire, Ohio, South Dakota, Iowa, and Connecticut have the highest shares of working adults who are economically secure (Table 2). Worst States for Economic Security: California, New York, Hawaii, Oregon, and Florida have the lowest shares of working adults who are economically secure (Table 2). Map 1. How the States Measure Up on Basic Economic Security Source: IWPR compilation of data from the Basic Economic Security Tables available at www.basiceconomicsecurity.org. The level of income required to live with basic economic security varies widely around the country for each family type (Table 2). A single working adult needs $24,648 (with benefits) to live with economic security in South Dakota, but $50,508 to live in the District of Columbia, the areas with the lowest and highest annual incomes necessary for basic economic security for this family type. A single working parent with one infant needs $37,128 (with benefits) to live with economic security in Arkansas, but $81,588 to live in the District of Columbia, the areas with the lowest and highest annual incomes necessary for basic economic security for this family type. A family with two working parents, one infant, and one preschooler needs $60,816 (with benefits) to live with economic security in Arkansas, but $124,320 to live in the District of Columbia, the areas with the lowest and highest annual incomes necessary for basic economic security for this family type. 5

Table 2. Annual Income Needed for Economic Security by Family Household Type and State, 2016 BEST Index BEST Annual Income Needed by Household Type, 2016 State single working parent two working parents with one % with single working adult State with one infant infant and one preschooler Economic Ranking With Without With without without Security with benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits benefits benefits Alabama 67 31 st $29,580 $30,852 $41,088 $40,488 $64,224 $65,232 Alaska 73 9 th $34,536 $36,456 $55,728 $56,256 $85,344 $87,624 Arizona 65 45 th $30,120 $31,776 $47,196 $48,420 $75,912 $78,000 Arkansas 68 30 th $26,112 $27,024 $37,128 $35,508 $60,816 $60,480 California 58 51 st $42,060 $47,292 $64,620 $69,588 $94,992 $106,848 Colorado 67 36 th $34,152 $38,136 $56,124 $59,400 $88,512 $94,248 Connecticut 74 5 th $36,936 $40,908 $60,168 $64,608 $92,136 $98,904 Delaware 65 43 rd $35,124 $39,120 $54,228 $57,588 $85,032 $88,032 District of Columbia 69 26 th $50,508 $55,884 $81,588 $87,048 $124,320 $135,744 Florida 62 47 th $31,668 $33,780 $50,112 $50,964 $74,568 $77,568 Georgia 64 46 th $32,544 $35,532 $47,148 $48,300 $72,816 $75,168 Hawaii 61 49 th $45,456 $52,452 $66,588 $73,308 $96,216 $105,504 Idaho 66 40 th $26,220 $27,996 $40,260 $40,476 $65,040 $67,200 Illinois 70 24 th $32,688 $35,556 $51,276 $54,012 $82,032 $88,560 Indiana 71 16 th $27,204 $28,068 $41,520 $41,484 $70,968 $74,640 Iowa 75 4 th $26,436 $27,276 $41,424 $41,256 $68,424 $71,784 Kansas 72 14 th $26,352 $27,408 $41,292 $41,328 $69,840 $72,504 Kentucky 70 22 nd $27,396 $28,296 $41,052 $41,568 $66,288 $67,704 Louisiana 67 35 th $29,472 $30,912 $41,544 $38,760 $65,544 $64,224 Maine 70 23 rd $31,284 $33,684 $48,372 $51,192 $74,616 $78,744 Maryland 69 25 th $43,272 $47,700 $66,264 $69,624 $94,248 $100,464 Massachusetts 70 20 th $41,340 $45,552 $66,312 $70,740 $105,984 $116,856 Michigan 71 18 th $28,752 $30,216 $44,280 $46,344 $70,896 $76,704 Minnesota 72 12 th $30,588 $32,832 $50,028 $52,704 $84,696 $91,032 Mississippi 65 42 nd $27,948 $29,364 $37,932 $36,276 $61,176 $60,048 Missouri 72 15 th $27,204 $28,320 $39,540 $39,516 $66,216 $67,944 Montana 66 41 st $27,648 $29,172 $43,488 $43,956 $70,224 $72,672 Nebraska 73 11 th $26,472 $27,312 $42,672 $42,312 $68,928 $71,208 Nevada 69 27 th $27,360 $28,464 $46,080 $46,848 $72,648 $74,592 New Hampshire 78 1 st $32,892 $34,680 $52,200 $52,752 $80,832 $84,552 New Jersey 70 21 st $40,296 $45,108 $61,356 $66,216 $92,448 $99,120 New Mexico 65 44 th $27,228 $28,260 $43,644 $44,328 $70,224 $71,976 New York 59 50 th $44,088 $49,740 $66,972 $77,184 $101,496 $118,272 North Carolina 67 37 th $29,976 $31,776 $46,164 $46,632 $73,704 $75,504 North Dakota 74 7 th $27,144 $28,344 $41,232 $41,100 $66,864 $68,520 Ohio 76 2 nd $26,052 $26,676 $40,848 $40,740 $66,624 $69,264 Oklahoma 67 34 th $27,480 $28,500 $43,368 $41,940 $68,496 $68,472 Oregon 61 48 th $34,200 $38,892 $53,400 $56,928 $85,608 $91,416 Pennsylvania 74 8 th $30,408 $32,004 $47,856 $49,356 $76,608 $80,496 Rhode Island 72 13 th $32,868 $34,980 $53,748 $55,140 $84,552 $89,712 South Carolina 66 39 th $29,784 $31,740 $42,624 $42,216 $67,776 $68,760 South Dakota 75 3rd $24,648 $24,744 $37,140 $34,596 $61,416 $59,592 Tennessee 71 17 th $26,892 $27,600 $40,500 $39,264 $65,880 $66,144 Texas 67 32 th $29,172 $30,624 $44,652 $44,256 $69,504 $69,720 Utah 66 38 th $28,104 $29,988 $47,496 $49,848 $74,568 $79,344 Vermont 68 28 th $33,528 $36,252 $52,392 $54,528 $81,720 $87,840 Virginia 67 33 rd $39,384 $43,764 $58,920 $63,228 $89,448 $94,152 Washington 68 29 th $35,316 $39,144 $56,040 $59,040 $86,112 $92,352 West Virginia 70 19 th $27,024 $27,984 $39,948 $39,756 $65,184 $68,280 Wisconsin 73 10 th $28,368 $29,604 $48,588 $51,000 $78,672 $84,360 Wyoming 74 6 th $26,676 $27,768 $40,752 $41,556 $67,680 $69,192 United States 67 n/a $33,012 $35,760 $50,916 $53,328 $79,224 $83,544 Notes: Benefits include employment-based health insurance and retirement plans. Infants are aged 0 12 months and preschool children are 13 48 months. Source: IWPR compilation of data from the Basic Economic Security Tables available at www.basiceconomicsecurity.org. 6

Policies that Increase Access to Economic Supports for Vulnerable Populations Will Strengthen Economic Security Policies that promote economic security for economically vulnerable populations are essential to improving the health, well-being, and stability of individuals, families, and the nation as a whole. For example, initiatives to increase access to education and training opportunities that lead to well-paid jobs, strong safety net programs for those who earn very low wages or cannot work, and access to affordable financial services such as credit repair and debt remediation, and financial assistance, can help ensure that individuals across the nation have the economic security they need to thrive. Notes 1 The Basic Economic Security Tables (BEST) were originally created by researchers at Wider Opportunities for Women (WOW) and the Center for Social Development (CSD) at Washington University as a part of WOW s national BEST Initiative. 2 U.S. Department of Commerce. Economics and Statistics Administration. 2017. Poverty Thresholds for 2017 by Size of Family and Number of Related Children under 18 Years. <https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/historical-povertythresholds.html> (accessed June 13, 2018). 3 While the BEST Index s calculations for workers with benefits include only employer-provided health insurance and a retirement plan, additional benefits such as paid sick days, paid family and medical leave, life insurance, and temporary disability insurance would also help many working adults to have basic economic security. Technical Notes Calculations are based on analyses of data from the American Community (ACS) Survey for 2012 2016 (Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 7.0). The sample includes households where the householder and their spouse or partner are aged 19 to 64 years, one or both are employed, and up to 6 related, dependent children under age 19 are living with them. Workplace benefits are measured as employment-based health insurance for either the householder or their spouse/partner. Economic security is determined by comparing the household s economic resources (the total income reported by the householder and their spouse/partner) to the Basic Economic Security Index for their family structure considering number of workers and distribution of related children by age. Households with economic resources greater than or equal to their BEST needs are counted as economically secure. About the Basic Economic Security Tables Index The BEST Index was originally developed by Wider Opportunities for Women and the Center for Social Development at Washington University-St. Louis, and is maintained by the Institute for Women s Policy Research. The BEST Index presents the specific economic needs of more than 400 family types all possible one- or two-worker families with up to six children for every state and county in the United States. The Index draws on more than 100 data sources from the federal government and other organizations, including the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the National Center 7

for Education Statistics, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and Child Care Aware of America, among others. To find a list of these sources and the BEST Index for a particular state or county, see http://www.basiceconomicsecurity.org/. About the Institute for Women s Policy Research The Institute for Women's Policy Research (IWPR) conducts and communicates research to inspire public dialogue, shape policy, and improve the lives and opportunities of women of diverse backgrounds, circumstances, and experiences. The Institute's research strives to give voice to the needs of women from diverse ethnic and racial backgrounds across the income spectrum and to ensure that their perspectives enter the public debate on ending discrimination and inequality, improving opportunity and increasing economic security for women and families. The Institute works with policymakers, scholars, and public interest groups to design, execute, and disseminate research and to build a diverse network of individuals and organizations that conduct and use women-oriented policy research. IWPR's work is supported by foundation grants, government grants and contracts, donations from individuals, and contributions from organizations and corporations. IWPR is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization that also works in affiliation with the Program on Gender Analysis in Economics at American University. This fact sheet was prepared by Joo Yeoun Suh, Ph.D., Jennifer Clark, and Jeff Hayes, Ph.D., at the Institute for Women s Policy Research. This project was supported by Grant No. 2015-SI-AX-K407 awarded by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. 8