KPERS 2016 Actuarial Valuation

Similar documents
KPERS 2016 Actuarial Valuation

KPERS Update. Presented by: Alan Conroy, Executive Director Phone: Senate Ways and Means Committee

KPERS Update. Presented by: Alan Conroy, Executive Director Phone: House Appropriations Committee

KPERS Update. System Overview, Valuation and Working After Retirement. Presented by: House Pensions and Benefits Committee

KPERS Update. System Overview. Presented by: House Appropriations Committee

KPERS Update. Presented by: Overview, Governor s Budget Proposal and Triennial Experience Study

KPERS Overview. Presented by: Alan D. Conroy, Executive Director Phone: Senate Ways and Means Committee

Kansas Public Employees

Amortizing KPERS Unfunded Actuarial Liability

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System

GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT

Jarod Waltner, Planning and Research Officer Alan D. Conroy, Executive Director Judy McNeal, Chief Fiscal Officer

A Tale of Two Savers. Age 25. I'm a long way from retirement. I really want to buy a truck...

A Tale of Two Savers. Age 25. I'm a long way from retirement. I really want to buy a truck...

Green Thumb Tips to Grow Retirement Dollars

The Forgotten Benefit

House Financial Institutions and Pensions Committee. HB 2448; Moving State Correctional Officers to KP&F

KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Bills Signed into Law

School District of [Employer], Kansas Notes to Basic Financial Statements June 30, 2015

Bills Signed into Law

Life Insurance Needs Are Not One-Size-Fits-All

Report of the Joint Committee on Pensions, Investments and Benefits to the 2019 Kansas Legislature

Kansas Legislative Research Department September 24, 2003 MINUTES. August 27-28, 2003 Room 519-S Statehouse

House Committee on Financial Institutions and Pensions. HB 2764; Moving certain Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism officers to KP&F

Report of the Joint Committee on Pensions, Investments, and Benefits to the 2016 Kansas Legislature

Discussion of Valuation Results

M A R Y L A N D S T A T E R E T I R E M E N T A N D P E N S I O N S Y S T E M

Summary of Key Points. Kansas Legislative Research Department Summary of Legislation

Report of the Joint Committee on Pensions, Investments, and Benefits to the 2015 Kansas Legislature

KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

Teachers Retirement Association of Minnesota

Bills Signed into Law

KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENTS SYSTEM

Fire and Police Pension Fund, San Antonio

MINUTES JOINT COMMITTEE ON PENSIONS, INVESTMENTS, AND BENEFITS

Teachers Retirement System of the State of Illinois

Working After Retirement

Teachers and State Employees Retirement System Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2016

Report on a Possible New Plan Design for the Shelby County Retirement System

CALPERS UPDATES, RATES AND ALTERNATIVES. Basic Pension Rule: Benefits + Expenses. Contributions* + Investment Earnings. Agenda

State Retirement and Pension System of Maryland Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2004

October 8, Board of Trustees State Universities Retirement System of Illinois 1901 Fox Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820

Teachers Retirement Association of Minnesota

Title: Understanding Pension Actuarial Reports

Teachers and State Employees Retirement System Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2017

In addressing some possible viable options and recommendations, the Pension Subcommittee has prepared a presentation enumerates a number of basic fina

Consolidated Judicial Retirement System of North Carolina Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2013

Pension Plan of Town of West Warwick Management Summary of 7/1/2013 Actuarial Valuation

TCDRS Retirement Briefing. March 7, 2012

Teachers Retirement Association of Minnesota A Pension Trust Fund of the State of Minnesota. Actuarial

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2015 Legislative Retirement Note

Maryland State Retirement and Pension System Actuarial Valuation Report As of June 30, 2017

State of Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2007

November 6, Board of Trustees State Universities Retirement System of Illinois 1901 Fox Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820

E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M O F R H O D E I S L A ND ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T AS OF J U N E 3 0, 201 3

San Diego City Employees Retirement System. City of San Diego. Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, Produced by Cheiron

Actuarial. Actuarial. Actuarial. Actuarial. Actuarial. Actuarial. Actuarial

Kansas Court of Appeals Kansas Supreme Court District Magistrate District Court. Guide. Kansas Retirement System for Judges KPERS

Teachers Retirement Association of Minnesota

Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Virginia Retirement System. Prepared as of June 30, 2014

System Keynotes. Investment Strategy Actuarial Results, Funded Levels, Contributions, Demographics

Employees Retirement System of Rhode Island Actuarial Valuation Report As of June 30, 2017

Employes Retirement System of the City of Milwaukee

Commonwealth Actuarial Valuation Report

KPERS Spending (millions)

Maine Public Employees Retirement System State Employee and Teacher Retirement Program. Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, 2017

JOINT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO. 2031

San Diego City Employees Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2013 for the San Diego Unified Port District. Produced by Cheiron

North Carolina Firefighters and Rescue Squad Workers Pension Fund Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2013

Municipal Fire & Police Retirement System of Iowa

KPERS Death and Disability Benefit Program. Annual Report and GASB 43 Actuarial Valuation As of June 30, 2014

TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ACTUARIAL VALUATION JUNE 30, 2009

Larry Langer, ASA, FCA, EA, MAAA Jonathan Craven, ASA, FCA, EA, MAAA

MINUTES KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM BOARD OF TRUSTEES. January 17, 2014

ENROLLED SENATE BILL No. 686

M U N I C I P A L E M P L O Y E E S A N N U I T Y A N D B E N E F I T F U N D O F C H I C A G O ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T F O R T H E Y E A R

KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM (KPERS) STUDY COMMISSION FINAL REPORT

POLICEMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO (A Component Unit of the City of Chicago)

IPERS Actuarial Assumptions and Methods 2015

North Carolina Local Governmental Employees Retirement System Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2013

North Carolina Local Governmental Employees Retirement System. Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2014

Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Virginia Retirement System

KPERS. Membership Guide Kansas Police & Firemen s Retirement System. Information for Members KP&F Tier I KP&F Tier II

Tier I Tier II. Guide. Kansas Police & Firemen s Retirement System KPERS

PERS Overview Senate Committee on Workforce

Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, Produced by Cheiron

State Universities Retirement System of Illinois. Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, 2018

LOUISIANA STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM JUNE 30, 2016 ACTUARIAL VALUATION

Louis Kosiba IMRF Executive Director Richard DeCleene IMRF Chief Financial Officer

Local Governmental Employees Retirement System Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2017

Experience Study 1. How does MERS ensure plans are sustainable? 2. Why does MERS conduct an Experience Study every 5 years?

TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF LOUISIANA JUNE 30, 2016 ACTUARIAL VALUATION

July 30, The Retirement Board City of Taylor Police and Fire Retirement System Taylor, Michigan

Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Public Employees Retirement Association of Colorado

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Retirement Note

Actuarial Basics. Presented by Mike Overley, Regional Manager Tony Radjenovich, Regional Manager

Transcription:

KPERS 2016 Actuarial Valuation Presented by: Alan Conroy, Executive Director Phone: 785-296-6880 Email: aconroy@kpers.org Joint Committee on Pensions, Investments, and Benefits November 27, 2017 1

KPERS Update & Funding Status KPERS overview Funding status Valuation purpose Key factors affection valuation: 2017 appropriations legislation Experience study Valuation results Projections 2

KPERS OVERVIEW 3

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System Dependable Benefits. Trusted Partner. KPERS is a fiduciary providing retirement, disability and survivor benefits to our members and their beneficiaries with a 98-member staff. KPERS administers three statewide, defined benefit plans for public employees. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System Kansas Police and Firemen s Retirement System Kansas Retirement System for Judges KPERS partners with more than 1,500 state and local government employers. State of Kansas 286 school districts 105 counties 425 cities and townships Other employers include libraries, hospitals, community colleges and conservation districts 4

KPERS Overview Board of Trustees Chairperson Lois Cox, CFA, CFP, Manhattan Vice President for Investments and Chief Investment Officer, Kansas State University Foundation Appointed by the Governor Ernie Claudel, Olathe Retired teacher Elected member school James Cusser CFA, Mission Hills Wall Street Investment Banker and Mutual Fund Manger; Adjunct Associate Professor of Political Science, Johnson County Community College Appointed by the Governor Suresh Ramamurthi, Topeka Chairman, CBW Bank Appointed by the President of the Senate Ryan Trader, Olathe Firefighter/Paramedic, City of Olathe Elected member - non-school Vice-Chairperson Kelly Arnold, Wichita County Clerk, Sedgwick County Appointed by the Governor Shawn Creger, Prairie Village Financial Advisor, Edward Jones Appointed by the Speaker of the House Jake LaTurner, Wichita Kansas State Treasurer Statutory member Michael Rogers, Manhattan Certified Public Accountant Appointed by the Governor 5

FUNDING STATUS: Overview 6

Actuarial Valuation Discussion topics Purpose of valuation Key factors affecting 2016 valuation Valuation results Key system statistics (e.g., membership, average benefit) Funded status (Unfunded actuarial liability and funded ratio) Employer contribution rates Projections of funded status and employer contribution rates for State/School and Local groups 7

Actuarial Valuations Purpose of Valuation Measurement of assets and liabilities Best estimate of ultimate costs Project future benefits using actuarial assumptions Calculate present value of future benefits (their cost in today s dollars) Apply cost method to allocate benefit costs to periods of service Calculate employer contribution rates FY 2020 for State/School Group CY 2019 for Local Group Baseline for any cost studies in 2018 legislative session 8

FUNDING STATUS: Key Factors Affecting Valuation 9

Actuarial Valuation Key Factors in 2016 Valuation Two particularly significant factors in the 2016 valuation: 2017 legislative appropriations changes Triennial experience study 10

Key factors 2017 Appropriations Legislation The appropriations bills passed by the 2017 Legislature made several changes to employer contributions. The payment of the FY 2016 employer contribution reduction ($97.4 million plus interest) that was scheduled to be paid on June 30, 2018 was eliminated. FY 2017 employer contributions were reduced by $64 million, but will be repaid over 20 years starting in FY 2018 (the first payment has already been made). FY 2019 employer contributions are reduced by $194 million, but will be repaid over 20 years starting in FY 2020. Reductions that are scheduled to be repaid are counted as a long-term receivable. Any changes to the repayment are reflected as non-collectible contributions (as was the case after the actions of the 2017 Legislature to cancel payment of FY 2016 deferred contributions). The employer contributions reductions were made without adjusting the statutory employer contribution rate. 11

10.91% 10.81% 12.01% 13.21% 13.23% 14.95% 14.85% 14.89% 14.41% 14.74% Legislative Changes KPERS State/School Employer Contribution Rates The statutory State/School employer contribution rate for FY 2018 is 12.01%. The employer contribution rate is scheduled to increase to 13.21% for FY 2019, but $194 million of that contribution will be delayed and paid over 20 years. The 12/31/2016 valuation sets the employer contribution rates for FY 2020 for State/School employers, but the rate is capped by statute. 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% KPERS State/School Employer Contribution Rates* The State/School statutory employer contribution has been below the actuarial required contribution for 24 years. 0% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Fiscal Year *Does not reflect reductions to the State/School employer contributions of $94 million in FY 2016, $64 million in FY 2017 and $194 million FY 2019. 12

Employer Contributions (in millions) Legislative Changes State/School Contributions $900 $700 $500 $300 $100 Actuarial and Statutory State/School Employer Contributions $433 $477 $481 $489 $333 $266 $306 $332 $353 $376 $408 $222 $603 $585 $612 $626 $642 $660 $734 $649 $115 $64 $548 $194 $454 $435 $371 $417 $420 $705 $729 $703 $755 $(100) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Fiscal Year Calculated contributions if the actuarial employer contributions were made Amount of repayment of FY 2016 4th quarter reduction Amount of reduction from baseline statutory rate - delayed portion of stuatotry rate paid over 20 years Legislative Approved (Senate Sub for Sub HB 2052 and Senate Sub for HB 2002) Actual Statutory Contributions Over three years (Fiscal Years 2017, 2018, and 2019), the State will pay or promise to pay KPERS $1.63 billion, of which $258 million will be layered or paid over 20-year periods, which totals the statutory amount that is due to KPERS over the three fiscal years. Assuming the layering payments are made, this will represent 3 years of the State paying at the statutory rate. The last year that the full statutory rate was paid was Fiscal Year 2014. No payment for the delayed $115 million payment from Fiscal Year 2016 in Fiscal Year 2018. That amount has been added to the unfunded actuarial liability as non-collectible pension contributions. The approved reductions in FY 2017 and FY 2019 will be treated as a long-term receivable and are included as assets in the 12/31/2016 actuarial valuation. 13

Key Factors Triennial Experience Study FY 2019 "Steady State" Contributions (in Millions) FY 2019 Normal Cost $98.6 Interest on 12/31/2016 State/School unfunded actuarial liability $518.5 Total State/School employer contributions needed to maintain steady state 12/31/2016 State/School unfunded actuarial liability $623.5 million X KPERS Investment Return Assumption = Payment of layer on FY 2017 deferred School contribution $6.4 million Interest on 12/31/2016 State/School unfunded actuarial liability $6.690 billion X 7.75% = $518.5 million Payment of layer on FY 2017 deferred School contribution $6.4 Actuarial payroll projection for FY 2019 X Employer Normal Cost Rate = FY 2019 normal cost $4.610 billion X 2.14% = $98.6 million 14

Key Factors Triennial Experience Study During CY 2016, the Board of Trustees adopted a number of changes to actuarial assumptions and method, based on the statutory triennial experience study. The Board has a fiduciary responsibility to set the actuarial assumptions using their best judgment in light of available information. Assumptions are long-term in nature and try to anticipate what will happen over decades, not react to short-term trends. Having accurate assumptions is important so that costs are not too high today or passed on to future generations. 15

Experience Study Assumption changes Based on the recommendation of the Board s actuarial consultant, changes were made to both economic assumptions (i.e. inflation, wage growth, investment returns) and demographic assumptions (i.e. mortality, retirement rates) The new assumptions are reflected in the 12/31/2016 actuarial valuation. The change in assumptions, primarily the lowering of the investment return assumption from 8.0% to 7.75%, increased the unfunded actuarial liability for all groups. 16

Experience Study Unfunded Actuarial Liability Amortization Method Actuarial methods were also reviewed in the experience study Changes were made to the amortization method Previously amortized the entire unfunded actuarial liability as a level percent of pay over closed 40-year period, starting in 1994 As recommended by the consulting actuary, revised to reduce the contribution rate volatility of a shorter period by Maintaining the same amortization schedule for the legacy unfunded actuarial liability Establishing separate layers amortized over 20-25 years for future changes in the unfunded actuarial liability 17

FUNDING STATUS: Key System Statistics 18

Valuation Results Key System Statistics Valuations provide a snapshot of key system statistics and comparisons with historical data to identify trends Total system membership Average salary and benefits for total system Total payroll and benefits 19

System Statistics Total system membership 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Active 153,804 156,073 160,831 157,919 155,054 156,053 155,446 154,203 152,175 152,119 Retired 67,102 70,567 73,164 76,498 80,527 84,142 86,843 90,693 93,866 96,774 Inactive 41,383 41,749 43,324 44,231 45,678 45,969 47,484 50,255 53,159 55,755-0.1% average annual change in active count since 2007. 3.4% average annual increase in retiree count since 2007 (4.9% increase for 2016). 20

System Statistics Average salary and benefits (total system) $50,000 $45,000 $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Average Annual Salary $38,681 $39,895 $40,617 $41,123 $41,285 $41,646 $41,878 $42,542 $43,395 $43,719 Average Annual Benefit $12,207 $12,460 $12,792 $13,148 $13,560 $13,840 $14,280 $14,564 $14,933 $15,257 1.4% annual increase in average salary since 2007. 0.7% increase for 2016. 2.5% annual increase in average benefits since 2001. 2.2% increase for 2016. 21

(in millions) System Statistics Total payroll and benefits (total system) $7,000 $6,000 $5,949 $6,227 $6,532 $6,494 $6,401 $6,499 $6,510 $6,560 $6,604 $6,650 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 $819 $879 $936 $1,006 $1,092 $1,165 $1,240 $1,321 $1,402 $1,476 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Payroll Benefits 22

2016 Valuation Summary of Valuation Results As a system, KPERS funded ratio remained stable, but the unfunded actuarial liability increased in the 12/31/2016 funding valuation. 12/31/2016 12/31/2015 Funded Ratio 67% 67% Unfunded Actuarial Liability $9.06 billion $8.54 billion Actuarially required contribution (ARC) rates increased for all groups, primarily due to the change in actuarial assumptions. The State/School group statutory employer contribution remains below the actuarial contribution rate. The statutory State/School employer contribution rate is projected to reach the actuarial required contribution rate in FY 2021, if actuarial assumptions are met and statutory contributions are paid as scheduled. 23

FUNDING STATUS: Actuarial Value of Assets 24

Valuation Results Development of Unfunded Actuarial Liability Unfunded actuarial liability = actuarial liability less actuarial assets Actuarial liability: Project future benefits using actuarial assumptions Calculate present value of future benefits (their cost in today s dollars) Apply cost method to allocate benefit costs to periods of service Actuarial value of assets Average or smoothed values 25

Actuarial Value of Assets Market value vs smoothed value Market value not used directly in valuation Asset valuation method used to smooth the effect of market fluctuations Goal is to provide more stability in contribution rates Smoothed value is called actuarial value of assets Recognize difference in actual investment return compared to expected return evenly over 5 years (at 8% for CY 2016, will change to 7.75% for CY 2017). 26

Actuarial Asset Value Impact of deferred experience Investment return on market value basis in CY 2016 (net) was 8.5%, Due to asset smoothing method, return on actuarial assets was 8.4%. Deferred experience yet to be recognized: Net deferred loss of $566 million this year vs. $515 million net deferred loss in last year s valuation. Will flow through smoothing method over the next 4 years. Expected to increase the unfunded actuarial liability and lower the funded ratio, absent favorable experience in future years. 27

$ Millions 2016 Valuation Historical Asset Growth $20,000 $18,000 $18,256 $16,000 $14,000 $17,690 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $- 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Calendar Year End Market Value Actuarial Value 28

FUNDING STATUS: Unfunded Actuarial Liability 29

Key Valuation Results Unfunded actuarial liability Unfunded actuarial liability = actuarial liability less actuarial assets Unfunded Actuarial Liability increased by $522 million to $9.061 billion 30

Valuation Results Development of 12/31/2016 unfunded actuarial liability Actuarial Liability (in millions) Actuarial Assets (in millions) Unfunded Actuarial Liability (in millions) Funded Ratio State $ 4,385 $ 3,463 $ 922 79.0% School 14,481 8,713 5,768 60.2% State/School* $ 18,867 $ 12,177 $ 6,690 64.5% Local $ 5,095 $ 3,580 $ 1,515 70.3% KP&F 3,175 2,329 846 73.4% Judges 182 171 11 93.9% Total* $ 27,318 $ 18,256 $ 9,061 66.8% *Amounts may not add due to rounding 31

Valuation Results Factors affecting the unfunded actuarial liability In 2016, the unfunded actuarial liability was impacted by: experience gains/losses (e.g., investment return and demographic changes like slower payroll growth) actual contributions (e.g., reduced contributions) amortization method (set in 1993 as a level percent of pay, added layering of annual changes in 2016) assumption changes (changes to economic and demographic assumptions as part of statutorily required triennial review) Factors specific to changes in the System s unfunded actuarial liability over the last year are quantified on next slide 32

Valuation Results Factors affecting System s unfunded actuarial liability System Unfunded Actuarial Liability: 12/31/2015 $ 8,539M Contribution cap/time lag* Amortization method Experience Note: Amounts may not add due to rounding 70M (38)M Investment (59)M Demographic/other (144)M Actuarial assumption changes Benefit changes 593M Contribution reductions (from FY 2016) 98.9M System Unfunded Actuarial Liability: 12/31/ 2016 *Time lag is the period from the valuation date (12/31/2016) to the date the new contribution rate takes effect e.g., 7/1/2019 for State and School Groups, 1/1/2019 for Local Group) 1M $9,061M 33

Valuation Results Factors impacting change in unfunded actuarial liability 12/31/15 unfunded actuarial liability State School Local KPF Judges Total $870.4 $5,405.5 $1,485.7 $771.6 $6.0 $8,539.2 Contribution cap/lag (25.7) 119.8 (16.5) (4.8) (2.5) 70.3 Amortization method (3.9) (24.2) (6.6) (3.4) (0.2) (38.3) Investment experience (15.3) (27.0) (8.7) (7.5) (0.6) (59.2) Demographic experience (36.3) (88.0) (37.6) 7.7 (1.4) (155.7) All other experience 8.1 6.8 (2.2) (0.7) 0.2 11.8 Actuarial assumption changes 120.3 281.0 100.6 81.9 9.6 593.4 FY 16 contribution reductions 4.1 94.4 0 0.4 0 98.9 12/31/16 unfunded actuarial liability Note: Dollars in millions $921.7 $5,768.3 $1,514.7 $845.5 $11.1 $9,061.4 34

Valuation Results Changes to funded ratio and unfunded actuarial liability December 31 December 31 2015 2016 2015 2016 State 79.3% 79.0% $870M $922M School 60.8% 60.2% $5,406M $5,768M State/School 65.2% 64.5% $6,276M $6,690M Local 69.1% 70.3% $1,486M $1,515M KP&F 74.0% 73.4% $772M $846M Judges 96.4% 93.9% $6M $11M Total 67.1% 66.8% $8,539 $9,061 35

Key Valuation Results Funding the unfunded liability The System has a funding plan to fully fund the System. The Legislature set a 40-year, closed amortization period in 1993. The Board of Trustees approved a layered amortization approach as part of the triennial experience study. The existing unfunded liability (legacy unfunded liability) remains on the 40-year amortization schedule, ending in 2033. Each year any experience different than the actuarial assumptions (either positive or negative) will be realized in separate 20-year amortization periods. Each layer will have an annual payment calculated and each layer s payment is added together to calculate a single unfunded liability payment. 36

Key Valuation Results Funding the unfunded liability Level percent of pay amortization methodology results in an increase in the dollar amount of unfunded actuarial liability over more than half of amortization period, even if full actuarial required contribution rate is paid. Amortization period on the legacy unfunded liability has declined and at the point where unfunded actuarial liability will start decreasing if full actuarial required contribution rate is paid and all assumptions are met. 37

FUNDING STATUS: Employer Contribution Rates 38

Key Valuation Results Statutory and actuarial required contribution rates Rates effective for years beginning in 2019 (FY 2020 for State/School; CY 2019 for Local). Employer contribution rates for State and Local continue to be at the full actuarial rate. State actuarial rate went from 8.28% to 9.49% Local actuarial rate went from 8.39% to 8.89% School only actuarial rate totals 16.15%, higher than the statutory rate of 14.41% for FY 2020. State/School combined statutory rate is 0.33% below the actuarial required rate in the 12/31/16 valuation (14.41% vs 14.74%). 39

Valuation Results Actuarial vs. statutory employer contribution rates December 31, 2016* Actuarial Statutory Shortfall State 9.49% 14.41% (4.92%)** School 16.15% 14.41% 1.74% State/School 14.74% 14.41% 0.33%*** Local 8.89% 8.89% 0.00% KP&F 22.13% 22.13% 0.00% Judges 18.65% 18.65% 0.00% * Rates apply in fiscal years beginning in 2018 (FY 2019 for State/School; CY 2018 for Local). ** As provided in statute, contributions above the State actuarial required contribution rate will be used to fund the School Group. *** State/School projected to reach actuarial required contribution date in FY 2021 at a rate of 14.99%. 40

Valuation Results Employer contribution rate comparisons Actuarial Rate (ARC as % of Pay) Statutory Contribution Rate % of ARC Contributed System 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 12/31/2016 State* 8.28% 9.49% 13.21% 14.41% 151.8% School 14.59% 16.15% 13.21% 14.41% 89.2% State/School 13.23% 14.74% 13.21% 14.41% 97.8% Local 8.39% 8.89% 8.39% 8.89% 100% KP&F 20.09% 22.13% 20.09% 22.13% 100% Judges 14.68% 18.65% 14.68% 18.65% 100% *NOTE: The excess of the statutory over the actuarial contribution rate on State payroll is contributed to the School group. 41

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 Valuation Results Components of State/School actuarial employer contribution rates 18% 16% Statutory Contribution Rate 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Valuation Date (12/31) Employer Normal Cost Unfunded Actuarial Liability Amortization 42

FUNDING PROJECTIONS 43

Funding Projections Not precise predictions but general estimates Preliminary model results final review continuing Projections based on many assumptions 7.75% return on market value in 2017 and all future years All actuarial assumptions met Current plan provisions Contributions are paid per current statutes New entrants in future years are similar to recent history 44

Funding Projections State/School funding 12/31/16 Valuation Funded Ratio: 64.5% Actuarial rate: 14.74% Statutory rate: 14.41% Actuarial required contribution date/rate (actuarial and statutory contribution rates are equal) Date: FY 2021 at rate of 14.99% Projected Date and Rate, based on prior valuation, was 13.12% in FY 2020 State/School statutory rate has exceeded the State-only actuarial rate since the December 31, 2010 valuation (setting the FY 2014 contribution rate), except for the Legislature s reset of the FY 2016 statutory rate Reductions of $64 million in FY 2017 and $194 million in FY 2019 in State/School contributions are assumed to be repaid over 20 years starting in FY 2018 and FY 2020 respectively. 45

$ Millions 2016 Valuation Long-term actuarial funding progress 8,000 7,000 6,000 Projected State/School Unfunded Actuarial Liability (UAL) 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 The projected Unfunded Actuarial Liability increases over the next three years before beginning to steadily decline. Last year s projections followed a similar pattern with a slightly lower Unfunded Actuarial Liability because it was based on the old set of assumptions. - 12/31 Valuation Prior Year Projection Current Year Projections 46

2016 Valuation Long-term actuarial funding progress Projected State/School Funded Ratio 120.0% 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% Due to increased Actuarial Liability from the assumption changes, the funded ratio is expected to reach 80% in 2029, one year later than last year s projection. 12/31 Valuation Prior Year Projection Current Year Projections 47

2016 Valuation Long-term actuarial funding progress Projected State/School Employer Contribution Rates 16% 12% 8% 4% The Actuarial Required Contribution date is expected to occur in FY 2021 at a rate of 14.99% (vs. 13.12% in FY 2020 in the 12/31/2015 valuation). 0% Fiscal Year End Statutory Actuarial 48

Funding Projections Short term projections (Total system) Return in 2017* 7.75% 0% -7.75% Valuation Date (12/31) Unfunded Actuarial Liability Funded Ratio Unfunded Actuarial Liability Funded Ratio Unfunded Actuarial Liability Funded Ratio 2017 $9,284M 67% $9,554M 66% $9,824M 65% 2018 9,665M 67% 10,309M 65% 10,953M 63% 2019 9,900M 67% 10,927M 64% 11,954M 60% 2020 9,807M 68% 11,209M 64% 12,611 59% *Assumes a 7.75% return in all years after 2017 so current deferred investment experience is reflected in future years. Also assumes reduced contributions for FY 2017 and FY 2019 are repaid as scheduled. 49

Status of KPERS Benefits will be here KPERS benefits are structured to be prefunded during each member s career. KPERS receives about $1 billion in contributions each year from employees and employers. KPERS had over $1 billion in investment income in FY 2017. KPERS pays about $1 billion in monthly benefits each year. 50

Status of KPERS Benefits will be here The fiduciary standard is our guiding principle and driving force. As a fiduciary, KPERS serves members by: Holding assets in trust; Growing those assets through investments; and Delivering promised benefits when the time comes. Funds can never be removed from a trust fund like KPERS for any reason other than to fund the benefits of members and pay expenses of the System. With over $19 billion in assets today and a well diversified investment portfolio, KPERS is able to pay promised benefits for many years. However, long-term funding is very important, and KPERS strives to provide the Legislature the funding needs of the System. 51