Figure 1: The function g(.)

Similar documents
Slow recovery from worst downturn since Great Depression. Monetary policy at the zero lower bound: Empirical evidence

OUTLINE November 22, FFR & Other Interest Rates. Long-term Interest Rates. Historical pattern of interest rates 11/20/ :15 AM

LECTURE 11 Monetary Policy at the Zero Lower Bound: Quantitative Easing. November 2, 2016

LECTURE 8 Monetary Policy at the Zero Lower Bound: Quantitative Easing. October 10, 2018

Comments on Foreign Effects of Higher U.S. Interest Rates. James D. Hamilton. University of California at San Diego.

Web Appendix. Are the effects of monetary policy shocks big or small? Olivier Coibion

Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply

Working Paper Series. How Has Empirical Monetary Policy Analysis Changed After the Financial Crisis?

State-Dependent Fiscal Multipliers: Calvo vs. Rotemberg *

Supplementary Appendix. July 22, 2016

FRBSF Economic Letter

Effects of the U.S. Quantitative Easing on a Small Open Economy

Supplementary Appendix to Government Spending Multipliers in Good Times and in Bad: Evidence from U.S. Historical Data

Backtesting Performance with a Simple Trading Strategy using Market Orders

December. US Interest Rates. Chartbook

How Quantitative Easing Works: Evidence on the Refinancing Channel

Advanced Macroeconomics 4. The Zero Lower Bound and the Liquidity Trap

Business Cycle Measurement

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES MEASURING THE EFFECTS OF UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON ASSET PRICES. Eric T. Swanson

The Influence of Monetary and Fiscal Policy on Aggregate Demand

October 2016 Market Update

Business Cycle Measurement

The Fed and The U.S. Economic Outlook

Credit Crises, Precautionary Savings and the Liquidity Trap October (R&R Quarterly 31, 2016Journal 1 / of19

A Perspective on Unconventional Monetary Policy

News Shocks and the Term Structure of Interest Rates: Reply Online Appendix

James Bullard President and CEO Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. SNB Research Conference Zurich 27 September 2014

CHAPTER 23 - THE SHORT-RUN MACRO MODEL. PROBLEM SET 2. a.

Negative Interest Rate Policy and Yield Curve

Liquidity is Relevant Again

For release at 2:00 p.m., EDT, September 26, 2018

For Online Publication. The macroeconomic effects of monetary policy: A new measure for the United Kingdom: Online Appendix

The reasons why inflation has moved away from the target, and the outlook for inflation.

OUTLINE November 20, Fed Balance Sheet FFR & Other Interest Rates. Historical pattern of interest rates 11/15/2017 1:40 PM

The Macroeconomic Effects of Protectionism

The Disappearing Pre-FOMC Announcement Drift

Time-Varying Lower Bound of Interest Rates in Europe

BIS Working Papers. The negative interest rate policy and the yield curve. No 703. Monetary and Economic Department

Trends & Long-Term Outlook for Fixed and Stable Value Funds

U.S. Interest Rates Chartbook September 2017

AQA Economics AS-level

Discussion of The Effects of Fed Policy on EME Bond Markets by J. Burger, F. Warnock and V. Warnock

Economic Outlook and Monetary Policy

Aggregate Supply and Aggregate Demand

E-322 Muhammad Rahman CHAPTER-3

Spillover Effects of U.S. Monetary Policy and Policy Uncertainty on Chinese Economy

U.S. Interest Rates Chartbook March 2018

California ISO. Flexible Ramping Product Uncertainty Calculation and Implementation Issues. April 18, 2018

Embracing flat a new norm in long-term yields

Optimal Monetary and Macroprudential Policy: Gains and Pitfalls in a Model of Financial Intermediation. March 28, 2014

Navigating the Fixed Income Minefield

RESPONSES TO SURVEY OF

Suggested Answers Problem Set # 5 Economics 501 Daniel

Capital and liquidity buffers and the resilience of the banking system in the euro area

RESPONSES TO SURVEY OF

A New Year, New Expectations in the US Treasury Market

Monetary and Fiscal Policy During the Great Recession: Old Challenges and New Insights

SURVEY OF PRIMARY DEALERS

Measuring the Effects of Federal Reserve Forward Guidance and Asset Purchases on Financial Markets

Conference on the Future of Forward Guidance. Sveriges Riksbank

Measuring the Effects of Federal Reserve Forward Guidance and Asset Purchases on Financial Markets

QUANTITATIVE EASING AND FINANCIAL STABILITY

The Impact of Monetary Policy on Inequality in the UK. An Empirical Analysis

The FOMC: Ahead on Results, Behind on Rates

Macroprudential Policies in a Low Interest-Rate Environment

Problem Set #3 ANSWERS. Due Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Shadow Interest Rates and the Stance of U.S. Monetary Policy

Implementation and Transmission of Monetary Policy

Section 3.1 Distributions of Random Variables

Chapter 13 Aggregate Demand, Aggregate Supply, Equilibrium, and Inflation. Kazu Matsuda BIZ 203 Macroeconomics

Economic Letter. Using the Countercyclical Capital Buffer: Insights from a structural model. Matija Lozej & Martin O Brien Vol. 2018, No.

U.S. INTEREST RATES CHARTBOOK MARCH U.S. Interest Rates. Chartbook. March 2017

Can we have low unemployment and low inflation? 2015 Pearson

Appendix 1: Materials used by Mr. Kos

The Eurozone s experience with unconventional Monetary Policy

Discussion of Lower-Bound Beliefs and Long-Term Interest Rates

ECON 3010 Intermediate Macroeconomics Solutions to the Final Exam

Unemployment Fluctuations and Nominal GDP Targeting

How Inflation Behavior Helps In the Estimation of Potential Real GDP

Part VIII: Short-Run Fluctuations and. 26. Short-Run Fluctuations 27. Countercyclical Macroeconomic Policy

Responses to Survey of Market Participants

THE TAYLOR RULE ERROR AND THE TERM STRUCTURE BEFORE AND AFTER THE GREAT RECESSION: THE ROLE OF QE, FORWARD GUIDANCE AND ZERO LOWER BOUND *

THE ZERO LOWER BOUND, THE DUAL MANDATE,

EQ: How Do Changes in AD and SRAS Affect Real GDP, Unemployment, & Price Level?

Forecasting the US and Wisconsin Economies in 2018

FRESH Ideas to Reinvent and Reimagine the Future of Credit Unions

Properties of the estimated five-factor model

5. STRUCTURAL VAR: APPLICATIONS

Monetary Policy Options in a Low Policy Rate Environment

Practice Test 1: Multiple Choice

NO pages. July Rate changes in bond indices. KTB & MSB Market Overview. Bank Bonds and Other Fin. Debentures

Phases of the Business Cycle. Business Cycle. Business Cycle

Country Spreads as Credit Constraints in Emerging Economy Business Cycles

FRBSF ECONOMIC LETTER

Márcio G. P. Garcia PUC-Rio Brazil Visiting Scholar, Sloan School, MIT and NBER. This paper aims at quantitatively evaluating two questions:

August Macro Update: Slowing Growth in Employment and Consumption

SURVEY OF PRIMARY DEALERS

Chapter 13. Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply

To sum up: What is an Equilibrium?

14.02 Principles of Macroeconomics

Transcription:

Figure : The function g(.) 5 3 y y = g(z) y = z 5 3 z 3 5 Notes: Blue curve: the function g(z) = zφ(z) + φ(z). Red dashed line: the 5-degree line. Figure : Forward rates 9 3m 6m y y 5y 7y y 8 7 6 5 3 99 99 99 996 998 6 8 Notes: One-month forward rates monthly from January 99 to December 3, measured in annualized percentage points. Maturities are 3 and 6 months,,, 5, 7 and years. The gray area marks the ZLB period from January 9 to December 3.

3.5 3.5.5.5 fitted observed Figure 3: Observed and fitted forward curves SRTSM 3.5 3.5.5.5 fitted observed GATSM 5 7 5 7 Notes: Average forward curves in. Blue curves: fitted forward curves, from the SRTSM in the left panel and the GATSM in the right panel. Red dots: observed data. X-axis: maturity in years. Figure : The shadow rate and effective federal funds rate 8 shadow rate effective federal funds rate r 6 99 99 99 996 998 6 8 Notes: Blue line: the estimated shadow rate of the SRTSM from January 99 to December 3 in percentage points. Green line: the effective federal funds rate in percentage points. Black line: lower bound r. The gray area marks the ZLB period from January 9 to December 3. 3

Figure 5: Loadings on the macroeconomic factors and policy rate Loadings on macro factor Loadings on macro factor 3 Loadings on macro factor 3 3 Loadings on policy rate 3 5 6 7 8 9 Notes: Loadings of standardized economic variables Yt m on the three macroeconomic factors and the standardized policy rate. X-axis: identification number for economic variables in the Online Appendix. Vertical dashed lines separate variables by groups, and the groups are: real output (-8); employment and hours (9-); consumption (3-6); housing starts and sales (7-53); real inventories, orders and unfilled orders (5-58); stock prices (59-6); exchange rates (6-6); interest rates (63-73); money and credit quantity aggregates (7-79), price indexes (8-9); average hourly earnings (95-96); miscellaneous (97).

Figure 6: Observed and counterfactual macroeconomic variables.5 -.5 - -.5 - Policy rate 5 95 9 85 Industrial production index 5 35 3 5 5 Consumer price index realized counterfactural I counterfactual II -.5 3 8 3 3 78 76 7 7 7 Capacity utilization.5 9.5 9 8.5 8 Unemployment 9 8 7 Housing starts 68 7.5 6 66 7 5 6 3 6.5 3 3 Notes: Blue lines: observed economic variables between July 9 and December 3. Red dashed lines: what would have happened to these macroeconomic variables, if all the monetary policy shocks were shut down. Green dashed lines: what would have happened if the shadow rate was kept at r. 5

Figure 7: Impulse responses with full sample Notes: Impulse responses to a -5 basis-point shock on monetary policy. 9% confidence intervals are shaded. Sample: January 96 - December 3. Model: FAVAR with 3 macro factors and 3 lags. X-axis: response time in months. The policy rate is measured in annualized percentage; the industrial production index, consumer price index and housing starts are measured in percentage deviation from the steady state; the capacity utilization and unemployment rate are measured in percentage points. 6

Figure 8: Impulse responses (full sample vs. ZLB with EFFR) Notes: Impulse responses to a -5 basis-point shock on monetary policy. 9% confidence intervals are shaded. Blue: full sample from January 96 to December 3 with the policy rate in FAVAR (3). Turquoise: ZLB from July 9 to December 3 with the effective federal funds rate in FAVAR (). X-axis: response time in months. The policy rate is measured in annualized percentage; the industrial production index, consumer price index and housing starts are measured in percentage deviation from the steady state; the capacity utilization and unemployment rate are measured in percentage points. 7

Figure 9: Impulse responses (full sample vs. ZLB with new policy rate) Notes: Impulse responses to a -5 basis-point shock on monetary policy. 9% confidence intervals are shaded. Blue: full sample from January 96 to December 3 with the policy rate in FAVAR (3). Turquoise: ZLB from July 9 to December 3 with the policy rate in a FAVAR (). X-axis: response time in months. The policy rate is measured in annualized percentage; the industrial production index, consumer price index and housing starts are measured in percentage deviation from the steady state; the capacity utilization and unemployment rate are measured in percentage points. 8

Figure : the market s expected vs. Fed s announced ZLB lift-off dates 6 5 market anticipation Fed announcement at least through late at least through mid-5 5 3 at least through mid-3 9 3 Notes: Blue dots: the market s expected lift-off dates from January 9 to December 3. Four green vertical lines mark the following months when forward guidance specified explicit lift-off dates for the ZLB: August, January, September and June 3. The corresponding lift-off dates are in red diamonds. Black dashed line: the 5 degree line. 9

Figure : Impulse responses (ZLB with expected duration) ZLB duration Industrial production index.5.5 Consumer price index.5 -.5 -.5 8 -.5 8-8 Capacity utilization. Unemployment 6 Housing starts.5 -. -. -.5 8 -.3 8-8 Notes: Impulse responses to a one year shock to expected ZLB duration. 9% confidence intervals are shaded. Sample: ZLB from July 9 to December 3. Model: FAVAR () with the ZLB duration as the monetary policy measure. X-axis: response time in months. The expected duration is measured in years; the industrial production index, consumer price index and housing starts are measured in percentage deviation from the steady state; the capacity utilization and unemployment rate are measured in percentage points. 5

Figure : Impulse responses at ZLB (policy rate v.s. ZLB duration) ZLB duration Industrial production index.5.5 Consumer price index duration(yr) policy rate(-5bp).5 -.5 8 -.5 8 -.5-8.5 Capacity utilization. Unemployment 6 Housing starts policy rate duration -. -. -.5 8 -.3 8-8 Notes: Turquoise: impulse responses to a -5 basis-point shock on the policy rate. Blue: impulse responses to a one year shock on the ZLB duration. 9% confidence intervals are shaded. Sample: ZLB from July 9 to December 3. Model: FAVAR (). X-axis: response time in months. The policy rate is measured in -5 basis points; the expected duration is measured in years; the industrial production index, consumer price index and housing starts are measured in percentage deviation from the steady state; the capacity utilization and unemployment rate are measured in percentage points. 5

Figure 3: Policy rate and Fed s asset purchases.5.5 QE QE.5 OT QE3.5.5.5 3 8 9 3 5 Notes: Blue line: the extended policy rate in percentage points from our website: http: //faculty.chicagobooth.edu/jing.wu/research/data/wx.html. QE: the first round of quantitative easing from November 8 to March. QE: the second round of quantitative easing from November to June. OT: operation twist from September to December. QE3: the third round of quantitative easing from September to October. 5

Figure : Interest rates responses to Fed s announcements 5 yield QE one day prior forward rate QE one month prior expected path of shadow rate QE one month prior 3 5 5 3 5 6 7 8 9 3 5 6 7 8 9 3 5 6 7 8 9 3 yield Taper tantrum one day prior 6 forward rate Taper tantrum one month prior expected path of shadow rate 6 Taper tantrum one month prior 3 5 6 7 8 9 3 5 6 7 8 9 3 5 6 7 8 9 Notes: Top row: QE announcement on November 5, 8. Bottom row: taper tantrum on May, 3. First column: yield curves. Second column: forward curves. Third column: expected shadow rates. Blue: event dates. Green: one day prior to event dates for yields, one month prior to event dates for forward rates and expected path of shadow rates. X-axis: maturity in years. Y-axis: interest rates in percentage points. 53

Figure 5: Shadow rates 8 r=.5% r estimated 6 99 99 99 996 998 6 8 Notes: Blue line: the shadow rate from the benchmark model with r =.5% in percentage points. Green line: the shadow rate with estimated ˆr =.9% in percentage points. The gray area marks the ZLB period from January 9 to December 3. 5

Figure 6: Liftoff dates r=.5% r estimated 6 5 3 9 3 Notes: Blue dots: lift-off dates from the benchmark model with r =.5%. Green triangles: lift-off dates with estimated ˆr =.9%. Black dashed line: the 5 degree line. 55