CONCORD, the European NGO Confederation for Relief and Development, is seeking a:

Similar documents
CONCORD EU Delegations Report Towards a more effective partnership with civil society

Geographic & Thematic Programming of EU aid

EU Funding opportunities for CSOs

Job Description and Requirements Programme Manager State-building and Governance Job no in the EU Delegation to the Republic of Yemen

2 nd INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL EVALUATION of the EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (FRA)

Concord is the European confederation of Relief and Development NGOs, representing over 2,600 NGOs across the European Union

2011 SURVEY ON MONITORING THE PARIS DECLARATION

GUIDELINES FOR STRATEGIES IN SWEDISH DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE

Structure of EU institutions and Europe Aid proposal: An introduction

ANNEX V. Action Document for Conflict Prevention, Peacebuilding and Crisis Preparedness support measures

not, ii) actions to be undertaken

Introduction

The European Year of Development 2015 EYD2015. Opportunities and challenges, a role to play for CONCORD and its National Platforms

This action is funded by the European Union

Programming Aid Instruments

«FICHE CONTRADICTOIRE» Joint Country Level Evaluation of Bangladesh. (*For details on the recommendations please refer to the main report)

Office of the Auditor General of Norway. Handbook for the Office of the Auditor General s Development Cooperation

Communication agenda of SECO mechanism

The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework. Alain Akpadji Aid Effectivness Specialiste, UNDP Regional Center for Africa- Ethiopia

SURVEY GUIDANCE CONTENTS Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Job Description Form. Job description version2 (Active) Job no in DEVCO.F.DEL.Afghanistan Valid from 04/01/2018 until

WG EPAN Working Group on Enlargement, Pre-Accession and Neighbourhood

ANNEX 15 of the Commission Implementing Decision on the 2015 Annual Action programme for the Partnership Instrument

Action Document for EU Trust Fund to be used for the decisions of the Operational Board

Assignment Name: Workshop on EU Budget Support for civil servants of Macedonia Section 1. Introductory Information

The European Patients Forum (EPF) is looking for a committed, creative and experienced. Communications Manager

Presentation of the course: EU project design process and implementation of environmental policy

INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE TOR - CONSULTANCY IC/2012/026. Date: 16 April 2012

Terms of Reference (ToR)

Call for Tender - External Evaluation of the EPF 2017 Work Programme 16/03/2017

Task Force on Corporate Governance of Banks

DEVCO Exchange Seminar "Engaging strategically with civil society putting EU Country Roadmaps into practice"

Policy Forum January December 2012 Annual Work plan

MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT

Evaluation of the European Neighbourhood Instrument Draft Report Executive summary January 2017

STRATEGIC PROJECT SUPPORT TO EU ASSISTANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF EU EXTERNAL POLICIES

ANNEX. 1. IDENTIFICATION Beneficiary CRIS/ABAC Commitment references Total cost EU Contribution Budget line. Turkey IPA/2017/40201

Framework Programmes

DG Enlargement. Support to civil society within the enlargement policy 2. should be focused on enabling and

EU ETHIOPIA CIVIL SOCIETY FUND PROJECT MONITORING STRATEGY

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANT

Assignment Name: Workshop on EU Budget Support for civil servants from Montenegro, Trainer 1

CONCORD Principles for the EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) ???

Terms of Reference. External monitoring mission for the Project Mid-Term Review

Making the EU commitments a reality through smart programming November 2018

Joint Venture on Managing for Development Results

Terms of Reference for an Individual National Consultant to conduct the testing of the TrackFin Methodology in Uganda.

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 15 May /07 DEVGEN 89 ACP 94 RELEX 347

Action Fiche for Eastern Neighbourhood Civil Society Facility 2012 and 2013

The EU Multiannual Financial Framework and its application in Pan-Europe. Thierry Lucas, UNEP Brussels

Population Activities Unit Tel Palais des Nations Fax

Session IV. What is the SMEPI?

Development Education and Awareness Raising (DEAR) TRIALOG Study Visit, 03/03/2015 Valentina AURICCHIO, Markus PIRCHNER European Commission

37 days. 26 October (will depend on dates of HQ mission to Bxl) Deputy Director, UNICEF Brussels Office. 18 July 2018, 4pm Brussels time

ANNEX. DAC code Sector Economic and Development Planning

GUIDE THROUGH THE PROCESS OF PROGRAMMING AND MONITORING OF IMPLEMENTATION OF IPA II IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA FOR MEMBERS OF SECO MECHANISM

VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT

Council of the European Union Brussels, 9 August 2017 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

Development effectiveness through HLM. Trialog Study visit 2014

Guidelines on participation in EU External Assistance Programmes

137th session 20 May 2015 Provisional agenda item 5. Financing dialogue. Report by the Secretariat

I Introduction 1. II Core Guiding Principles 2-3. III The APR Processes 3-9. Responsibilities of the Participating Countries 9-14

Bilateral Guideline. EEA and Norwegian Financial Mechanisms

Twinning and Technical assistance Facility in support to the EU- Armenia ENP AP implementation CRIS n ENPI/2008/

DAC-code Sector Public Sector Policy and Administrative Management

«FICHE CONTRADICTOIRE»

Commissioner for Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Management

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER. European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid Action Plan

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 December 2015 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

Evaluation of the European Union's Cooperation with Bolivia. Summary. December 15, Development and Cooperation EuropeAid

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. Towards robust quality management for European Statistics

L 347/174 Official Journal of the European Union

Building a Nation: Sint Maarten National Development Plan and Institutional Strengthening. (1st January 31st March 2013) First-Quarter Report

Contract notice in 2014/S of 31/10/2014

ANNEX 14 of the Commission Implementing Decision on the 2015 Annual Action programme for the Partnership Instrument. Action Fiche for Public Diplomacy

EU Multiannual Financial Framework. Elise Vanormelingen September 2011

Terms of Reference for consultancy to carry out Project Base line study in the Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, Zambia and SADC region

Private Sector and development: a global responsibility?

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2015/2345(INI)

Universal access to health and care services for NCDs by older men and women in Tanzania 1

SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE. Fee-based service contract. TA support to the PFM Working Group Chair

Evaluation of the European Union s Co-operation with Kenya Country level evaluation

ANNEX. CRIS number: 2014/37442 Total estimated cost: EUR 5M. DAC-code Sector Public sector policy and administrative management

Mutual Accountability Introduction and Summary of Recommendations:

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

GLOBAL TERMS OF REFERENCE FRAMEWORK CONTRACT SERVICES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EXTERNAL AID (SIEA) 2018 EUROPEAID/138778/DH/SER/MULTI CONTENTS

Fund for Gender Equality Monitoring and Evaluation Framework Executive Summary

Strategic Partnerships

JOB DESCRIPTION. TBC within Asia region Asia Regional Office International/TBD 2 years (with possible extension) Head of Programmes

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONDUCTING MID-TERM EVALUATION FOR MALARIA PROJECT IN GEITA

JAES Action Plan : Cross-cutting issues

2 SCOPE OF WORK, RESPONSIBILITIES AND DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ANALYTICAL WORK

YES NO NOT SURE NOT APPLICABLE MOST IMPORTANT IMPORTANT. 1.2 If YES, please rate the importance of the following driving forces behind these changes:

Guidelines and how to prepare and carry out a SLIC Campaign

Guideline for strengthened bilateral relations. EEA and Norway Grants

Belgium-Brussels: IPA Support for the management of the EU funds 2016/S Service contract notice

YES NO NOT SURE NOT APPLICABLE MOST IMPORTANT IMPORTANT. 1.2 If YES, please rate the importance of the following driving forces behind these changes:

This action is funded by the European Union

SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE

Transcription:

CONCORD, the European NGO Confederation for Relief and Development, is seeking a: CONSULTANT TO PRODUCE A PUBLICATION ON THE ENGAGEMENT OF EU DELEGATIONS WITH CSOs CONCORD is the European Confederation of Development and Relief NGOs. Its 28 national associations, 18 international networks and 2 associate members represent over 1,800 NGOs which are supported by millions of citizens across Europe. Since 2005, CONCORD has been monitoring the relation between EU delegation and Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) in partner countries. Through concrete examples of experiences provided by individual CSO members, our past studies focused mainly on the funding relation at delegation level and EC grant compliance issues. In the last two years, the EU has stepped up its efforts to include CSOs as development actors in their own right through notably an increased dialogue concerning policy and programming of EU development aid and has made some other clear commitments in the Communication and subsequent Council Conclusions The roots of democracy and sustainable development: Europe's engagement with Civil Society in external relations. In light of these strategic shifts, the 2014 report should look at the implementation of this new framework through an in-depth analysis of the overall engagement of EU Delegations with CSOs regarding the political dialogue, the programming processes as well as the contracting & compliance processes. Summary of tasks: The consultant will have overall responsibility for: Finalizing the survey questionnaire covering the different parts of the report and transforming it in an online tool Coordinating the survey process and analysing the responses to the survey (in English, French and Spanish) and different documents relevant within the scope of the report Conducting min. 5 (phone) interviews with staff members of different EU Delegations in order to deepen or clarify some of the first findings of the survey analysis. In preparation of the interviews a letter of introduction should be prepared and sent to the Heads of Delegation of min.10 targeted EU Delegations, explaining what the interviews are about, and prepare a list of interview questions which should be attached to the letter of introduction. The contact details of the Head of Delegations can be found via the Delegation Directory. Presenting during a meeting or webinar with CONCORD members the findings of the analysis and interviews, progress so far and suggested ways forward Drafting of the report (around 24 pages in total), including: - an executive summary - key recommendations for EU delegations and for CSOs Reporting regularly on progress to the EU Delegation group of CONCORD through teleconference Proposed days: The consultancy work should be undertaken between the 15 th of July and November 2014. Month Key Tasks Number of days (estimate) July Optimize survey developed by CONCORD members and put it in an online tool 1

September Preparing the questions for the (phone) interviews with EU Delegations 0.5 Contacting EU Delegations and setting up (phone) interviews 0.5 Conducting (phone) interviews 2 October Analyse the responses to the questionnaire and interviews and present the findings to the group either in a face-to-face meeting or webinar Drafting of the report 6 5 TOTAL Consolidating comments from CONCORD members 1 16 DAYS The Consultant will work closely with the Policy and Advocacy Coordinator in the Secretariat coordinating this process who supervises his/her work during the process of drafting the publication. The current proposal is for the consultant to be hired at a charge-out rate of 430 per day (taxes included), which for 16 days would be a total of 6,880. Candidate profile: Successful candidates for this post will respond as much as possible to the following profile: Essential - Experience of policy analysis, report writing and political communication, incl. ability to clearly formulate key recommendations - Excellent English writing and editing skills; ability to write about complex issues in an engaging way - Good understanding of French and Spanish - University degree and experience in a relevant field - Experience in conducting research through survey development and analysis and through interviews - Excellent knowledge of EU Development Cooperation issues - Very good understanding and knowledge of the role of CSOs and the role and set-up of EU Delegations. Desirable - Experience of working in the NGO environment and with complex multicultural networks - Post-graduate degree in a relevant field Deadline for applications: Sunday, 13 July 2014 Please send your CV and cover letter to Lonne Poissonnier, CONCORD Secretariat, Lonne.Poissonnier@concordeurope.org

TERMS OF REFERENCE CONCORD EU DELEGATION ENGAGEMENT WITH CSOS REPORT 2014 Context and background Since 2005, the CONCORD Funding for Development and Relief (FDR) working group has been monitoring the relation between EU delegation and Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) in partner countries. Through concrete examples of experiences provided by individual CSO members, our past studies focused mainly on the funding relation at delegation level and EC grant compliance issues. However, this year s report aims to go further than EU funding and contracting processes. In the last two years, the EU has stepped up its efforts to include CSOs as development actors in their own right through notably an increased dialogue concerning policy and programming of EU development aid, which this report would like to analyse and monitor. Following the agreement between the EU institutions on the EU budget for 2014-2020 (Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020) in November 2013, including its external budget, the European Commission (EC) and partner countries had to decide how this money was going to be spent through what is called the programming process with discussions on priority sectors, objectives and programmes for the next seven years. In order to strengthen national ownership, the programming guidelines sent to EU Delegations stated the need to engage with CSOs during the various phases of this process. Furthermore, as outlined in the 2012 Communication and related Council Conclusions on Civil Society in Development, EU delegations are currently building CSO roadmaps at country level in order to strengthen the strategic cooperation and structured dialogue of the EU and its Member States with CSOs. In light of these strategic shifts, the 2014 EU Delegation Watch report will look at the implementation of this new framework through an in-depth analysis of the overall engagement of EU Delegations with CSOs regarding the political dialogue, the programming processes as well as the contracting & compliance processes. Aims and objectives of the publication Overall aim: The publication will contribute to improving the engagement between EU Delegations and CSOs. The specific objectives: - To assess the engagement between EU delegations and Civil Society Organizations in different areas: donor compliance, (multi-)annual (joint) programming, implementation of Human Rights strategies, elaboration and implementation of CSO roadmaps, political aspects such as the PCD principle, post 2015 and human rights. - To gather good practices and lessons learned and inform CSOs and the EU. - To issue recommendations to the EU, member states and CSOs to improve engagement. - To make reference to the technical guidance and tools developed in parallel for CSOs to engage more efficiently with EU delegations. Type and outline of publication The publication will be a report. It will be based primarily on research conducted through a survey, but also on qualitative research and analysis of institutional framework and current EU obligations. The data of the survey will be quantitatively analysed. A limited number of insightful good as well as bad examples will be qualitatively researched and analyzed in order to complement the quantitative survey and analysis. The publication would have 9 parts: 1. Foreword In this section a relevant key person will give his/her view on the importance of the topic as well as the findings and recommendations in the report. The person could e.g. come from the EU institutions, civil society, academia etc. Or we could have a foreword jointly signed by one EUD and one CSO representative from one of the success stories we have identified. 2. Executive summary This section will describe key finding and recommendations of the report in a clear and accessible way. 3. Introduction

This section will describe the context, motivation behind and the purpose of the report. 4. The institutional framework This section describes the institutional framework of EU Delegations relevant for their engagement with CSOs including the relevant obligations of EUDs to engage with CSOs. 5. Area 1: CSO involvement with EUDs in EU aid multiannual programming This section will investigate CSO involvement with EUD in aid programming cycle and opportunities for CSOs in the new multiannual programmes. This section will also investigate CSO involvement in advocacy towards better quality bilateral aid to developing country governments. This will include consultation of CS during the programming of bilateral aid, where the following will be investigated: - CSOs participation in identification and programming phases - Opportunities for CSOs in new programmes - Close-up - The involvement of EUDs concerning budget support dialogue and how CSOs in countries are represented in this dialogue structures; the support of EUDs for CSOs to participate in formulation as well as scrutiny of budget support given by EU institutions; 6. Area 2: CSO involvement with EUDs in EU aid implementation This section will look at how CSOs were engaged with EU Delegations in their annual programming cycle, including funding decisions and implementation of EU grants. This will include: - Funding opportunities: how were CSOs informed and consulted on funding opportunities and priorities of the calls for proposals. How much are CSOs informed about and involved in service contracts? - Grant implementation: capacity-building of CSOs on EU contractual procedures, use and interpretation of EU grant compliance rules (reporting, audits, procurements, etc.) 7. Area 3: CSO involvement with EUDs on enabling environment and dialogue This section will investigate the CSO involvement with EUDs on enabling environment and dialogue. This will include: - Focus: EU country CSO roadmaps This section focuses on a theme or question of particular timeliness and relevance in relation to engagement between EUDs and CSOs. In the 2014 report the focus area will be EU country CSO roadmaps. This section would also explain the link between the CSO roadmaps and the other sections of the report. EUD engagement with CSOs on human rights and gender related issues including in relation to EU country human rights strategies and Gender Action Plan. EUD support for people and/or organizations experiencing shrinking space 8. Area 4: CSO involvement with EUDs concerning broader policy issues This section will investigate CSO involvement with EUDs concerning broad policy issues relevant in country. This includes: Mechanism(s) in place for civil society to take up broader issues with EUDs The involvement of CSOs with EUDs concerning EU policies impact at country level The support of EUDs for CSOs to participate in formulation as well as scrutiny of public policies 9. Conclusion This section will draw main conclusions of the report. Methodology Firsthand information will be needed to ensure quality and reliable data in the report, both from CSOs and EU Delegations/HQ. Survey: covering policy dialogue, programming process and EC funding and compliance issues. It should be clearly mentioned in the survey that the questions target different audience, and organizations might need to split the questions according to their staff expertise. CONCORD members will translate the Survey into French and Spanish. Interviews (including on good practices: learning from peers favourable factors ): in addition to the survey, some interviews with CSOs and EUDs should be conducted on positive and negative experiences. These interviews can either be sent in writing, conducted over the phone or skype or in person but would have to be conducted in line with clear guiding instructions, incl. e.g. a list of targets, list of questions, reporting template, etc.

Analysis: results of the survey and interviews will need to be analysed and common trends and practices identified. As mentioned above, the analysis should take into account the 2013 survey and assess whether CONCORD s recommendations were taken into consideration or not, and if any improvement was felt on the CSO side. The analysis should focus on the positive experiences and best practices to be replicated and can highlight some good cases but should also point out the remaining challenges or still to be improved practices (of both EUDs and CSOs) while constructively proposing solutions to address them. Desk review of different documents o End July, all EUDs need to have their 3 priorities published they plan to focus on within the CSO roadmaps and around that time also the country MIPs/NIPs should be formally adopted (TBC). A review of CSO involvement in identifying these final priorities should be done. This should help us with the above analysis and identifying whether CSO recommendations were taken into account or not. A general review could also be done of the publically available information of the adopted CSO roadmaps as well as the thematic programme papers (complementarity) Audience CSOs local and INGOs (including the ones based in Brussels) EU Delegations all sections EU Member States at country level Additional advocacy targets: o Other EU institutions (DEVCO, EEAS, EP) including the Commissioner for Development, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, new MEPs have special briefs with key messages for them o National decision makers (depending on the context) local NGOs to share with partners o Other donors who have difficulties in engaging with CSOs (e.g. World Bank) Format of the publication Length: 24 pages Foreword (1 page) Executive summary (2 pages) Introduction (1 page) The institutional framework (2 pages) Area 1: CSO involvement with EUDs in EU aid programming (4 pages) Area 2: CSO involvement with EUDs in EU aid implementation (3 pages) Area 3: CSO involvement with EUDs on enabling environment and dialogue (6 pages) Area 4: CSO involvement with EUDs concerning broader policy issues (3 pages) Conclusion (1 page) Acknowledgements (1 page) The report will be layed out for Pdf on website as well as for printed version.