F IL E D. Clerk of the Superior Court. Attorneys for Plaintiff SAN DIEGO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION

Similar documents
Board Investment Policy Investment Roles and Responsibilities

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/18 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

City and County of San Francisco Employees Retirement System

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/21/2008 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Introduction. Duties and Responsibilities. OCERS Board Charter Board of Retirement. Board Members

Fiduciary Duties and Obligations in Administering 457(b) Plans under California Law

ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM MEMORANDUM

Health Service System Trust Fund Fiduciary Standards and Board Member Roles

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MICHAEL R. O NEAL, RHONDA BIESEMEIER, and DENNIS J. NASRAWI SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 1 Filed 03/07/13 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:18-cv MCE-KJN Document 1 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Case 1:15-cv MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2015 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE POLICY

Case 1:14-cv WJM-NYW Document 47 Filed 06/16/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

TAX OBJECTION COMPLAINT PACKET

Case 4:16-cv RGE-SBJ Document 59 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 14

MASTER TRUST FOR THE OPTIONAL RETIREMENT PLAN OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FOR EMPLOYEES OF INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION

STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF BERNALILLO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT. Plaintiff, Case No. CV

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 18

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 111 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1029

FIDUCIARY SCENARIOS: CAN YOU SPOT THE ISSUES?

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR

TRUST AGREEMENT ARTICLE I TRUST FUND

Case 2:12-cv RCJ -GWF Document 1 Filed 07/26/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR THE COURT CLERK REGARDING THIS MATTER

8:17-cv RFR-FG3 Doc # 1 Filed: 05/26/17 Page 1 of 14 - Page ID # 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT:

Case 2:16-cv BSJ Document 2 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 9

Attorneys for Insurance Commissioner of the State of California as Liquidator of SeeChange Health Insurance Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

WORKWEEK DISPUTE FORM

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 13

PROWN, m. FEB FEUERSTEIN, J. "CAC"), in connection with the collection of a debt allegedly owed by Plaintiff in.

Establishing and Maintaining an OPEB Trust

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING I. PARTIES

Case 3:13-cv AC Document 1 Filed 03/09/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

ORDER OF THE COURT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; SETTLEMENT HEARING; AND CLAIM AND EXCLUSION PROCEDURES

Case 1:15-cv PKC Document 1 Filed 10/13/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 7:18-cv NSR Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED vs.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

COURT USE ONLY Attorneys for Plaintiff: COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Municipal Tax ) ) I. INTRODUCTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. 4. Plaintiff Scott A. Thompson ("Thompson") is a San Diego Police Officer and

Case 5:14-cv FB-JWP Document 1 Filed 10/16/14 Page 1 of 12

INSURANCE COVERAGE COUNSEL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 4:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/02/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

JACKSONVILLE POLICE AND FIRE PENSION FUND Standard Procedures Manual

Case No.: CLASS ACTION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT, 15 U.S.C. 1692, ET SEQ.

Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles RITE AID PHARMACIST WAGE AND HOUR CASES Case No. J.C.C.P CLAIM FORM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHILTON COUNTY, ALABAMA

A Simple Guide to the Fiduciary Responsibilities of Public Pension Plans

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SOLANO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Human Resources Director

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

CHAPTER 3 SERVICE PROVIDER DISCLOSURE POLICY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

OAKLAND DIVISION CASE NO.:

Model Ethics and Conflict-of- Interest Policy for Texas Public Retirement Systems PENSION REVIEW BOARD

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/14 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. This action involves the Wells Fargo & Company 401(k) Plan (the 401(k) Plan ), which

ALAN FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. WALTER C. PETERSON, as City Clerk etc., et al., Respondents

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No.

Local Government Surplus Funds Trust Fund; creation; objectives; certification; interest; rulemaking.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO/OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff R.J. Zayed ( Plaintiff or Receiver ), through his undersigned counsel

D sa et al. v. Amber India Corp., et al San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC

Case 1:17-cv SS Document 42 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SANTA ANA DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv EEF-JCW Document 1 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 13

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. Plaintiff Board of Education of the City of Chicago (the School Board ), by and through

Case 2:18-cv SJF-AYS Document 3 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 7

Case: 2:16-cv JLG-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/14/16 Page: 1 of 14 PAGEID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA. v. ) Case No. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted an annual evaluation of the City Manager, David Brandt; and

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 5:08-cv JF Document 13 Filed 06/24/2008 Page 1 of 7

SAN FRANCISCO ARTS COMMISSION STATEMENT OF INCOMPATIBLE ACTIVITIES

AN ESTIMATE OF YOUR SHARE OF THE SETTLEMENT IS SET FORTH ON THE GREEN CLAIM FORM.

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 4:10-cv TSH Document 1 Filed 07/09/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Claimants, Respondents. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY. services, called ancillary services, to respondent California Independent System Operator

. the court ordered that the judgment debtor named in 2 may pay the judgment described

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT YOU MAY BE REQUIRED TO FILE A CLAIM FORM. NOT ALL CLASS MEMBERS ARE REQUIRED TO FILE A CLAIM FORM.

Case 2:17-cv SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

2:13-cv CWH Date Filed 06/26/13 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Transcription:

4 5 6 7 8 9 Steven P. Rice (State Bar No. 94321) srice@crowell.com CROWELL & MORING LLP 3 Park Plaza, 20th Floor Irvine, CA 914-8505 Telephone: (949) 3-8400 Facsimile: (949) 3-8414 Attorneys for Plaintiff SAN DIEGO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION Exempt from filing fee under Cal. Gov't Code,sc 6103 F IL E D Clerk of the Superior Court SEP 0 5 2014 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ORIGINAL F CIVIL BUSINESS OFFE CENTRAL DIVISION 201 1i SEP -5 PH 3:03 (7'At, _1 1E60 COON; Y, CA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 SAN DIEGO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION, V. Plaintiff, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, and DOES 1 through 10, Defendants. Case N u.37-2014-00030113-cu-mc-ctl COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF "VIA FAX" 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 crowi.ll & Mold Nk; IF Plaintiff alleges as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff San Diego County Employees Retirement Association ("SDCERA") is a public retirement system organized and existing under the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, Cal. Gov't Code 31450 et seq. ("CERL"). Since its formation effective July 1, 1939, SDCERA has existed for the benefit of active, deferred, and retired general and safety employees of the County of San Diego ("County") and other participating employers. SDCERA currently has over 39,000 members, including over 17,500 active members, almost 5,000 deferred members, and over 16,500 retired members. SDCERA collects pension contributions from the participating employers and employees, provides member communication, education, and other member services, administers and pays pension benefits and certain ancillary benefits, supervises 1

investment of trust funds currently in excess of $10 billion, and performs such other work as is 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 necessary to conduct its business. 2. SDCERA is a separate and independent public entity from the County and the other participating employers. SDCERA is governed by an independent nine-member Board of Retirement, consisting of four members elected by SDCERA's members (two active general member representatives, one active safety member representative, and one retired member representative), four members appointed by the County Board of Supervisors, and the sitting County Treasurer-Tax Collector. Cal. Gov't Code 31520.1(a). CERL provides that "the management of the system is vested in the board of retirement." Cal. Gov't Code 31520. Under the California Constitution, the Board of Retirement has "plenary authority and fiduciary responsibility for... administration of the system." Cal. Const., art. XVI, 17. This authority 12 exists InJotwithstanding any other provisions of law or this Constitution to the contrary." Id. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 CROWELL dr MORING LIP AlT010/kYS A Lmv The Constitution further states that the Board of Retirement has the "sole and exclusive responsibility to administer the system." Cal. Const., art. XVI, 17(a). 3. Under the ultimate supervision and control of the Board of Retirement, SDCERA has an internal staff of approximately 80 employees. These employees implement the directions, decisions, and policies of the Board of Retirement in furtherance of its fiduciary duties. 4. Defendant County of San Diego is a California political subdivision existing under the Constitution and statutes of the State of California. The County is governed by its elected Board of Supervisors. 5. The identities of defendants named herein as Does 1 through 10, inclusive, are currently unknown to SDCERA, and therefore such defendants are sued by fictitious names. SDCERA is informed and believes and thereon alleges that the fictitiously named defendants have a legal interest in this matter. If and when the identities of such defendants, or any of them, are discovered, SDCERA will amend this complaint to state their true names and capacities. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. This matter is within the general jurisdiction of this Court. 7. Venue is appropriate in this Court under California Code of Civil Procedure -2-

section 394(a), which provides that an action, such as this one, against a county may be brought in that county. 3 SUMMARY 4 8. This action concerns the Board of Retirement's authority under CERL and the 5 Constitution to set the compensation of SDCERA's employees. SDCERA contends that the 6 Board of Retirement has compensation-setting authority as part of its "plenary authority and 7 fiduciary responsibility" and "sole and exclusive responsibility" for the administration of the 8 system. Cal. Const., art. XVI, 17, 17(a). SDCERA further contends that the Board of 9 Retirement cannot effectively administer the system and perform its fiduciary duties without this 10 authority. However, the County asserts that its Board of Supervisors has the authority to set the 11 compensation of SDCERA's employees. SDCERA, through its Board of Retirement, staff, and 12 counsel, and the County, through its Board of Supervisors, staff, and counsel, have had extensive 13 discussions about the issue, but the parties have been unable to resolve their differing views. The 14 Board of Supervisors continues to assert and exercise the power to set the compensation of all of 15 SDCERA's employees over SDCERA's objection. SDCERA, therefore, files this Complaint for 16 Declaratory Relief to obtain a declaration from this Court to resolve this important governance 17 issue. 18 RELEVANT CERL PROVISIONS 19 9. Under CERL, SDCERA's Board of Retirement has the express authority and 20 responsibility to appoint and manage SDCERA's personnel. 21 10. Section 31520 provides that "the management of the retirement system is vested in 22 the board of retirement." Section 31522.1 provides that the Board of Retirement "may appoint 23 such administrative, technical, and clerical staff personnel as are required to accomplish the CROWELL & MoRING LIP AliCKNEVF At LAW necessary work of the board[ 1." Section 31522.1 further provides that this staff shall be appointed "from eligible lists created in accordance with the civil service or merit system rules" of the County. Section 31522.1 also provides that, "[t]he personnel shall be county employees and shall be subject to the county civil service or merit system rules and shall be included in the salary ordinance or resolution adopted by the board of supervisors for the compensation of county -3-

CROWEL L Sr MCNI LLP Airoki vg AT LAW officers and employees." Pursuant to Section 31522.1, SDCERA has appointed and employs 2 approximately 75 administrative, technical, and clerical staff. 3 11. Section 31522.2, which has been made operative as to SDCERA by resolution of 4 the Board of Supervisors, provides that the Board of Retirement "may elect to appoint an 5 administrator." Section 31522.1 further provides that "the administrator shall not be subject to 6 county civil service or merit system rules." Section 31522.2 also provides that the administrator 7 "shall be a county employee and the position of administrator shall be included in the salary 8 ordinance or salary resolution adopted by the board of supervisors for the compensation of county 9 officers and employees." Section 31522.2 states that the administrator "shall be directed by, shall 10 serve at the pleasure of, and may be dismissed at the will of," the Board of Retirement. Pursuant 11 to Section 31522.2, the Board of Retirement has appointed a Chief Executive Officer. 12 12. Section 31522.3 provides that the Board of Retirement "may elect to appoint 13 assistant administrators and chief investment officers." Section 31522.3 further provides that 14 these employees "shall not be subject to county charter, civil service, or merit system rules." 15 Section 31522.3 also provides that these employees "shall be county employees and shall be 16 included in the salary ordinance or salary resolution adopted by the board of supervisors for the 17 compensation of county officers and employees." Section 31522.3 states that these employees 18 "shall be directed by, shall serve at the pleasure of, and may be dismissed at the will of," the 19 Board of Retirement. While SDCERA does not currently employ a chief investment officer, 20 SDCERA employs, pursuant to Section 31522.3, assistant administrators, including a Chief 21 Operating Officer and a Director of Member Services. 22 13. Taken together, all of SDCERA's approximately 80 employees are appointed 23 pursuant to Sections 31522.1, 31522.2, and 31522.3. 14. Section 31580.2 provides that the Board of Retirement has the authority to budget and pay for SDCERA's employees as an expense of administering the system. Section 31580.2 fbrther provides that the expenses of administering the system "shall be charged against the earning of the retirement fund." Pursuant to Section 31580.2, the salaries of all SDCERA employees are paid from and charged against SDCERA's own funds. -4-

15. CERL does not specifically or expressly state whether the Board of Retirement or 2 the Board of Supervisors has the authority to set the compensation for those employees appointed 3 under Sections 31522.1, 31522.2, and 31522.3. However, the appointment power given by CERL 4 to the Board of Retirement cannot be effectively exercised in the absence of compensation-setting 5 authority, which is a central and necessary element in the selection, retention, evaluation, and 6 management of employees. The ability of the Board of Retirement to administer the system is 7 impaired in the absence of such authority. 8 16. The Board of Supervisors' role under Section 31522.1, 51522.2, and 31522.3 to 9 perform the ministerial task of including the compensation determined by the Board of 10 Retirement in the County's compensation ordinance. Were the Board of Supervisors to have the 11 authority to actually set the compensation of SDCERA's employees, it would interfere with 12 SDCERA's status as an independent governmental entity, which is separate from the County, and 13 it would deprive the Board of Retirement of the independent decision-making power that is 14 vested in it under CERL with respect to the management of the system. 15 RELEVANT CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS 16 17. Under article XVI, section 17 of the California Constitution, "[n]otwithstanding 17 any other provisions of law or this Constitution to the contrary, the [Board of Retirement] shall 18 have plenary authority and fiduciary responsibility for... administration of the system." 19 18. Article XVI, section 17(a) further provides that the Board of Retirement "shall 20 have the sole and exclusive fiduciary responsibility over the assets or the system and "shall also 21 have the sole and exclusive responsibility to administer the system in a manner that will assure 22 prompt delivery of benefits and related services to the participants and their beneficiaries." 23 Article XVI, section 17(a) provides that SDCERA's assets "are trust funds and shall be held for the exclusive purposes of providing benefits to participants in the pension or retirement system and their beneficiaries and defraying reasonable expenses of administering the system." 19. Article XVI, section 17(b) provides that the members of the Board of Retirement "shall discharge their duties with respect to the system solely in the interest of, and for the exclusive purposes of providing benefits to, participants and their beneficiaries, minimizing now n -5- NIORiNG I.LP ATTORNEYS AT tav4

1 CROW ELI MORiNCI LLP PITCRNEYS AT LAW employer contributions thereto, and defraying reasonable expenses of administering the system." This language also appears in CERL. See Cal. Gov't Code 31595(a). 20. Article XVI, section 17(c) provides that the members of the Board of Retirement 4 "shall discharge their duties with respect to the system with the care, skill, prudence, and 5 diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent person acting in a like capacity 6 and familiar with these matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and 7 with like aims." See also Cal. Gov't Code 31595(b). 8 21. Under article XVI, section 17, the "plenary authority" and "sole and exclusive 9 responsibility" of the Board of Retirement over the administration of the system, including the 10 system's "expenses," is given constitutional dimension. The Constitution is express in 11 recognizing that this authority exists "[n]otwithstanding any other provisions of law or this 12 Constitution to the contrary." 13 22. Taken together, these words give the Board of Retirement the broadest possible 14 authority over the administration of the retirement system in the exercise of its fiduciary duties. 15 The constitutional language resolves any perceived ambiguity in the structure and wording of 16 CERL in favor of the Board of Retirement's authority in all matters of administration, including 17 compensation-setting for SDCERA's employees. 18 23. The Board of Retirement cannot effectively and prudently exercise its plenary and 19 exclusive authority over the administration of the system and fulfill its fiduciary duties under the 20 Constitution if it does not have compensation-setting authority. The Board of Retirement's 21 authority and duties are implemented in large part through the selection, retention, evaluation, and 22 management of SDCERA's employees as the face of the organization and the instrumentalities 23 through which the Board interfaces with the world and accomplishes its objectives. By exercising compensation-setting authority, the Board of Supervisors deprives the Board of Retirement of an important part of its constitutional power. TnE PARTIES HAVE AN ACTUAL CONTROVERSY REQUIRING RESOLUTION BY THIS COURT. An actual controversy now exists between SDCERA and the County with respect -6-

to compensation-setting authority for SDCERA' s employees. CROW ELL MORING LI.P A11'00101 AT LAW 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23. On the one hand, SDCERA contends that the Board of Retirement has the authority, under the provisions of CERL and the California Constitution, to set the compensation for all of SDCERA's employees and that the Board of Supervisors is required, as a purely ministerial act, to incorporate whatever compensation is decided by the Board of Retirement into the County's compensation ordinance.. On the other hand, the County contends that the Board of Supervisors has the unfettered authority to set the compensation of all of SDCERA's employees and is free to disregard the decisions of the Board of Retirement with respect to compensation. In fact, the County has refused to implement decisions of the Board of Retirement as to the amount of compensation for various of SDCERA's employees.. SDCERA desires a judicial determination by this Court as to the Board of Retirement's compensation-setting authority under CERL and the Constitution.. A judicial determination by this Court is necessary and appropriate at this time so that the parties will know the extent of and can implement their compensation-setting authority under CERL and the Constitution with respect to SDCERA's employees. WHEREFORE, SDCERA prays for judgment as follows: 1. For a declaration that, under CERL and the California Constitution, the Board of Retirement has the authority to set the compensation of all of SDCERA's employees and that the Board of Supervisors is required, as a ministerial act, to incorporate the Board of Retirement's compensation decisions into the County's compensation ordinance; 2. For costs of suit; and 3. For such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. DATED: September 5, 2014 CROWELL & MORINO LLP By Steven P. Rice Attorneys for Plaintiff SAN DIEGO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION -7-