Survey Methodology Overview 2016 Central Minnesota Community Health Survey Benton, Sherburne, & Stearns Counties

Similar documents
Results from the 2009 Virgin Islands Health Insurance Survey

Fact Sheet. Health Insurance Coverage in Minnesota, Early Results from the 2009 Minnesota Health Access Survey. February, 2010

November 1, 2010 I. Survey Methodology Selection of Households

The American Panel Survey. Study Description and Technical Report Public Release 1 November 2013

REGION 7W DESCRIPTION. Demographics

Introduction to Survey Weights for National Adult Tobacco Survey. Sean Hu, MD., MS., DrPH. Office on Smoking and Health

Survey Project & Profile

BZComparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) Module 3: Sample Design and Data Collection Report June 05, 2006

Appendix Table 1: Rate of Uninsurance by Select Demographics (2015 to 2017)

Fact Sheet March, 2012

NEBRASKA RURAL POLL. A Research Report. Health Care Reform: Perceptions of Nonmetropolitan Nebraskans Nebraska Rural Poll Results

Health Insurance Coverage in Oklahoma: 2008

Survey Methodology. Methodology Wave 1. Fall 2016 City of Detroit. Detroit Metropolitan Area Communities Study [1]

PERCEPTIONS OF EXTREME WEATHER AND CLIMATE CHANGE IN VIRGINIA

NEBRASKA RURAL POLL. A Research Report. Optimism in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of Well-Being Nebraska Rural Poll Results

NEBRASKA RURAL POLL. A Research Report. Earning a Living in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska Nebraska Rural Poll Results

NEBRASKA RURAL POLL. A Research Report. Funding Public Services: Opinions of Nonmetropolitan Nebraskans Nebraska Rural Poll Results

Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) Module 4: Design Report (Sample Design and Data Collection Report) September 10, 2012

Quality of Life in Rural Nebraska: Trends and Changes

CENTER FOR APPLIED RURAL INNOVATION

Guide for Investigators. The American Panel Survey (TAPS)

Making a Living in Rural Nebraska

Minnesota Department of Transportation. Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan. Transit Needs Calculation Tech Memo

Fact Sheet. Health Insurance Coverage in Minnesota, 2001 vs February Changes in Health Insurance Coverage and Uninsurance

Massachusetts Household Survey on Health Insurance Status, 2007

OREGON STATE BAR 2007 ECONOMIC SURVEY

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) Module 4: Design Report (Sample Design and Data Collection Report) September 10, 2012

Appendix B: Survey Methodology

Perceptions of Well-Being and Personal Finances Among Rural Nebraskans

Quality of Life in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of Well-Being and Church Life: 2012 Nebraska Rural Poll Results: A Research Report

NANOS SURVEY. Canadians divided on changes to tax treatment of private corporations NANOS SURVEY

Palm Beach County Augmentation to the 2004 Florida Health Insurance Study

Well-Being in Non-Metropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of the Present and Views of the Future

THE BIA REPORT ON CONSUMER CONFIDENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SURVEY CENTER

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

HEDIS CAHPS HEALTH PLAN SURVEY, ADULT AND CHILD Beneficiary Satisfaction Survey Results

Field Operations, Interview Protocol & Survey Weighting

Response Mode and Bias Analysis in the IRS Individual Taxpayer Burden Survey

Small Area Health Insurance Estimates from the Census Bureau: 2008 and 2009

Postgraduate Fellowship Compensation Survey. Division of Member Services, Research American College of Healthcare Executives

2019 Colorado Health Access Survey (CHAS) Survey Administrator Request for Proposal (RFP) April 2018

New Brunswickers are three times more pessimistic than optimistic about the standard of living of future generations

In contrast to its neighbors and to Washington County as a whole the population of Addison grew by 8.5% from 1990 to 2000.

Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) Module 4: Design Report (Sample Design and Data Collection Report) September 10, 2012

City of Burleson, TX

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report - Second Quarter 2015

Appendices. Strained Schools Face Bleak Future: Districts Foresee Budget Cuts, Teacher Layoffs, and a Slowing of Education Reform Efforts

CONSUMPTION POVERTY IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOSOVO April 2017

Central Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report Third Quarter 2016

Views on Canada s role in peacekeeping missions. National survey released October, 2016 Project NANOS SURVEY NANOS SURVEY

Impressions of Canadians on US Election and presidential candidates. National survey released November 2016 Project NANOS SURVEY

2007 Minnesota Department of Revenue Taxpayer Satisfaction with the Filing Process

Nebraska State and Federal Tax Issues: Opinions of Rural Nebraskans

A majority of Canadians would look favourably or somewhat favourably on politicians who defend Canada s dairy sector in NAFTA negotiations

Are Canadians ready for their retirement?

Central Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report Second Quarter 2016

FAMILY ASSETS FOR INDEPENDENCE IN MINNESOTA (FAIM) FAIM New Participant Application Form AGENCY USE ONLY : Agency Name:

Insurance, Access, and Quality of Care Among Hispanic Populations Chartpack

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Fourth Quarter 2014

Salt Lake City 2010 Population by 5-Year Age Groups and Sex

The Cost of Living in Iowa 2018 Edition

Wave 1 Survey Mood of Voters - Summary Submitted by Nanos to the Telegraph Journal, September 2018 (Submission )

National survey released May, 2018 Project

Designing a Multipurpose Longitudinal Incentives Experiment for the Survey of Income and Program Participation

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report First Quarter 2018

The Center for Rural Studies 207 Morrill Hall University of Vermont Prepared by: Michele Cranwell, Evaluation Coordinator

Poverty in the United Way Service Area

2017:IVQ Nevada Unemployment Rate Demographics Report*

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

TEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD. BENEFITS AND SERVICES COMMITTEE Item Number: 5. SUBJECT: Demographic Characteristics of CalSTRS Members

Minnesota Minimum-Wage Report, 2013

First-time Homebuyers in Rural and Urban Pennsylvania

MEMORANDUM. Gloria Macdonald, Jennifer Benedict Nevada Division of Health Care Financing and Policy (DHCFP)


THE BIA REPORT ON CONSUMER CONFIDENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SURVEY CENTER

Canadians opinions on the impact of international trade agreements on the Canadian economy Nanos Trade Survey Summary

Kansas Speaks 2012 Statewide Public Opinion Survey

Twin Cities Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report - Third Quarter 2016

HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE IN MAINE

Canadians opinions on possible key priorities for the federal budget National survey released February 2016 Project NANOS SURVEY NANOS SURVEY

Demographic Survey of Texas Lottery Players 2011

Twin Cities Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report, Second Quarter 2014

SURVEY OF INSURANCE STATUS 2006 METHODOLOGICAL REPORT

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Third Quarter 2017

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Trends in Receipt of Public Assistance and Poverty Status,

RESULTS OF THE 2012 STATE FAIR SURVEY OF RETIREMENT AND LONG-TERM CARE

THE VALUE OF AN INVESTMENT & INSURANCE CUSTOMER TO A BANK

Survey of Washington Residents Denied Health Coverage. October 2009

Tell us what you think. Provide feedback to help make American Community Survey data more useful for you.

Central Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report - Second Quarter 2017

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report First Quarter 2017

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Second Quarter 2017

Mid - City Industrial

Central Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report: First Quarter 2014

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Transcription:

C E N T R A L M I N N E S O TA Community Health Survey In partnership with: Benton County, CentraCare Health, Fairview Northland Medical Center, Sherburne County, Stearns County and United Way Survey Methodology Overview 2016 Central Minnesota Community Health Survey Benton, Sherburne, & Stearns Counties Supported by the Statewide Health Improvement Program, Minnesota Department of Health.

Survey Methodology Overview The Central Minnesota Community Health Survey of adults was conducted between October and December, 2016 in Stearns, Benton and Sherburne counties. Survey Instrument For the 2016 survey, slight changes were made to the content of a survey conducted in the region in 2013. Staff from each of the participating public health agencies, CentraCare Health System, and other partners had selected and developed the questions for the 2013 survey instrument with technical assistance from the Minnesota Department of Health Center for Health Statistics. Existing items from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey and from recent county-level surveys in Minnesota were used to design some of the items on the survey instrument. The 2016 survey was formatted by the survey vendor, Survey Systems, Inc. of New Brighton, MN, as a scannable, self-administered English-language questionnaire. Sample A disproportionate stratified design was employed for the sample. Seven sampling strata were defined by county and ZIP code boundaries. Within each stratum, a two-stage sampling strategy was used for obtaining a probability sample of adults. For the first stage of sampling, a random sample of residential addresses within each stratum was purchased from a national sampling vendor (Marketing Systems Group of Horsham, PA). Address-based sampling was used so that all households would have an equal chance of being sampled for the survey. Marketing Systems Group obtained the list of addresses from the U.S. Postal Service. For the second stage of sampling, the most recent birthday method of within-household respondent selection was used to specify one adult from each selected household to complete the survey. Survey Administration An initial survey packet was mailed to 8,868 sampled households that included a cover letter, the survey instrument, and a postage-paid return envelope on October 14, 2016. Nearly two weeks after the first survey packets were mailed (October 24), a reminder postcard was sent to all sampled households, reminding those who had not yet returned a survey to do so, and thanking those who had already responded. Two weeks after the reminder postcards were mailed (November 8), another full survey packet was sent to all households that had still not returned the survey. The remaining completed surveys were received over the next four weeks, with the final date for the receipt of surveys being December 16, 2016. 2016 Central MN Health Survey Methodology, Page 2 of 5

Survey Response Reporting area Number of addresses sampled Number of completed surveys Response rate St. Cloud metro (56301, 56303, 56304, 56374, 56377, 56379, and 56387) 2,468 552 22.4% Stearns County whole 2,760 769 27.9% Stearns County rural (Stearns excluding 56301, 56303, 56374, 56377, and 56387) 1,600 497 31.1% Benton County whole 2,400 657 27.4% Benton County rural (Benton excluding 56304, 56379 and 56377) 1,600 476 29.8% Sherburne County whole 3,708 809 21.8% Sherburne County 55308 and 55309 (Becker and Big Lake) 1,600 362 22.6% Sherburne County balance (Sherburne excluding 56304, 55308 and 55309) 1,600 348 21.8% Three county region 8,868 2,235 25.2% Data Entry and Weighting The responses from the completed surveys were scanned into an electronic file by Survey Systems, Inc. To ensure that the survey results are representative of the adult population of each reporting area, the data were weighted when analyzed. The weighting accounts for the sample design by adjusting for the number of adults living in each sampled household and for the disproportionate stratification. The weighting also includes a post-stratification adjustment so that the gender and age distribution of the survey respondents mirrors the gender and age distribution of the adult population in the three counties according to U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2015 estimates. 2016 Central MN Health Survey Methodology, Page 3 of 5

About the Data Tables For every table in this data book, results are displayed for sub-groups of respondents based on: Gender: male and female Age: 18-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, and 75+ Highest level of education: high school graduate/ged or less, trade or vocational school/some college/associate degree, bachelor s degree, and graduate or professional degree Poverty status: Less than or equal to 200% of poverty level, and more than 200% of poverty level The columns in each table correspond to the response options respondents were given on the survey; each column indicates the percentage of respondents who gave that response to the question. Some questions apply only to certain types of respondents (due to skip patterns in the survey). About the Survey Methods This is a mailed survey. According to best practices in survey research (i.e., best response rate for lowest cost), a three-mailing sequence was used for all sampled households, which includes an initial survey packet, a reminder post card, and a final packet. The survey was sent to a random sample of households in the three counties. All households had an equal chance of being sampled. The response rates for this survey are within the expected range for surveys using the threemailing sequence with no incentive offered for participation. The survey data are adjusted using design weighting, which is necessary to account for the sample design, and post-stratification weighting, which is a statistical technique commonly used to adjust for nonresponse (whereby certain types of people are more or less likely to respond to surveys). These methods ultimately produced a final sample that is statistically representative of the adult population. 2016 Central MN Health Survey Methodology, Page 4 of 5

How to Use This Data Display, Data Book, Tool For each survey question, results are displayed for all respondents and for demographic subgroups of respondents within the selected geography, including: Gender (female and male) Age group (ages 18-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74 and 75+) Highest level of education attained (high school graduate/ged or less; Trade/vocational degree, Associate degree or some college; Bachelor s degree; graduate or professional degree) Whether household income corresponds to less than/equal to 200% of federal poverty level, or more than 200% of federal poverty level The columns in each table correspond to the response options that respondents were given on the survey. Each column indicates the percentage of respondents who gave that response to the question. Some answer categories are combined because of the low number of responses in those categories. Some questions apply only to certain types of respondents, due to skip patterns on the survey. For statistical validity purposes, all survey results are based on at least 30 responses within a demographic sub-group. If a demographic characteristic is no longer in view, it means there were not at least 30 responses in that category. 2016 Central MN Health Survey Methodology, Page 5 of 5