Butler (Village of), WI

Similar documents
Weber School District, UT

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Carroll (County of) MD

City of Oak Creek, WI

Newport News (City of) VA

Columbia School District, MO

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Edison (Township of) NJ

WILTON (TOWN OF) CT. Update to credit analysis. Credit strengths. » Affluent residential tax base. Credit challenges

Montgomery County, TX

Rockwall County, TX. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Above average socioeconomic indices. Credit Challenge

Findlay City School District, OH

Westport (Town of) CT

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Allen Independent School District, TX

Celina Independent School District, TX

Huffman Independent School District, TX

City of Mesquite, TX

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Bothell (City of) WA

City of Oakland, CA. Update to Credit Analysis. CREDIT OPINION 19 April Summary

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

New Issue: Moody's upgrades Edgewater, NJ's GO to Aa2: assigns MIG 1 to $15.4M in BANs

Bexar County, TX. Exhibit 1 Assessed Valuation Gains Reflect Continued Economic Activity CLIENT SERVICES. Source: Bexar County, TX,

St. Mary's County, MD

Cherokee County Board of Education, AL

Rio Rancho, NM. Credit Strengths. Sizeable and stable tax base. Healthy reserves. Manageable debt burden with rapid payout.

George W. Kuhn Drainage District (Oakland County), MI

Cocoa (City of) FL. Update to credit analysis following assignment of Aa2 issuer rating. CREDIT OPINION 12 April Summary.

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Findlay City School District, OH

Port Jefferson Union Free School District, NY

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

Lubbock (City of), TX

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

Wicomico County, MD. Credit Strengths. » Well-funded pension plan. Credit Challenges. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

Volusia County School District (FL)

Celina Independent School District, TX

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

Township of Nutley, NJ

Masconomet Regional School District, MA

Park District of La Grange, IL

City of Las Cruces, NM

West Fargo Public School District No. 6, ND

Newport News, VA. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Strong financial management. Credit Challenges. Below average demographics

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

US Local Government GO Debt Methodology

Evanston (City of), IL

Underwriting standards for credit cards and auto loans tighten modestly, a positive

Montgomery County, TX

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

Evanston (City of) IL

Rating Update: Moody's affirms Aa3 on Waukegan Park District, IL's GO debt

Taos Municipal School District 1, NM

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Framingham, MA's $43.9M GO bonds, MIG 1 to $4.4M GO BANs

Dallas County Community College District, TX

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa2 UND/Aa3 ENH to Roswell ISD (Chaves County), NM's GOULT bonds, Ser Sep 2018

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Prince William County, VA

City of Isle of Palms, SC

Shreveport, LA. Credit Strengths. Credit Challenges. Very limited liquidity. Weak income and employment trends. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

Bernalillo Municipal School District 1 (Sandoval County), NM

Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit, PA

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Sevierville (City of) TN

Prince William County, VA

Las Cruces School District 2, NM

Oakland (City of), CA

Mongolian Banking System

Los Alamos Public School District, NM

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 to Ford County USD No. 443's (KS) GOs Series 2015-A and Series 2015-B

Duquesne University, PA

Ag Lending Experience of Living Through the Cycles

Federal Home Loan Banks

Regional Economic Outlook

Siauliu Bankas, AB. Siauliu Bankas capital metrics will strengthen with EBRD s debt-to-equity conversion. ISSUER COMMENT 13 August 2018

American Samoa (Territory of)

Massachusetts (Commonwealth of)

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

New Rochelle City School District, NY

Hoover (City of), AL

PSP Capital Inc. Update to credit analysis. CREDIT OPINION 27 August Update

Jersey City Community Charter School, NJ

ABN AMRO Bank N.V. Q1 2018: Higher impairment offset revenue growth. ISSUER COMMENT 16 May Summary opinion

Moody s Muni Bond Rating Criteria & KS Local Government Trends

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Yanlord to Ba2; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 25 Apr 2017

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, IL

Metropolitan Water District of So. California

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

Cuyahoga County, OH. New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aa2 to Cuyahoga County, OH's Sales Tax Revenue Bonds. CREDIT OPINION 25 September 2017.

ISSUER COMMENT 02 DECEMBER 2014

Rating Action: Moody's reviews NORD/LB Luxembourg S.A. - Public-Sector Covered Bonds, direction uncertain 19 Dec 2018

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Kommunalkredit Austria AG's public-sector covered bonds Global Credit Research - 25 Jul 2017

Transcription:

CREDIT OPINION Butler (Village of), WI Update to credit analysis Summary Contacts Natalie Claes +1.312.706.9973 Associate Lead Analyst natalie.claes@moodys.com Butler, WI's (A1) credit profile is supported by improved financial performance and healthy, though nominally small, reserves. The tax base is modestly-sized and fully built out, which will limit significant growth, but it will continue to benefit from its close proximity to Milwaukee (A1 stable). The village's main credit challenges are high fixed costs resulting from an elevated debt burden and small scale of operations. Credit strengths Robert Weber +1.212.553.7280 VP-Senior Analyst robert.weber@moodys.com» Recent increases in operating reserves Alexandra S. Parker +1.212.553.4889 MD-Public Finance alexandra.parker@moodys.com» Favorably located within the Milwaukee metropolitan area» Modest pension burden Credit challenges CLIENT SERVICES Americas 1-212-553-1653» High fixed costs Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077» Small tax base compared to similarly rated credits Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454» Nominally small operating reserves Rating outlook Outlooks are generally not assigned to local government credits with this amount of debt. Factors that could lead to an upgrade» Significant expansion of the tax base» Material growth in operating reserves and liquidity» Moderation of fixed costs Factors that could lead to a downgrade» Deterioration of the tax base or weakening of the demographic profile» Narrowing of operating reserves» Increases to the village's debt or pension burdens

Key indicators Exhibit 1 Butler (Village of) WI 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $234,173 $234,060 $244,135 $247,978 $252,296 1,816 1,783 1,746 1,763 1,816 $128,950 $131,273 $139,825 $140,657 $138,929 99.1% 81.1% 102.2% 107.4% 105.2% $2,634 $2,629 $2,637 $2,837 $2,901 Economy/Tax Base Total Full Value ($000) Population Full Value Per Capita Median Family Income (% of US Median) Finances Operating Revenue ($000) Fund Balance ($000) $305 $830 $506 $525 $623 Cash Balance ($000) $1,278 $1,530 $1,355 $1,349 $1,385 Fund Balance as a % of Revenues 11.6% 31.6% 19.2% 18.5% 21.5% Cash Balance as a % of Revenues 48.5% 58.2% 51.4% 47.6% 47.8% Debt/Pensions Net Direct Debt ($000) $4,275 $5,107 $3,677 $3,585 $3,848 3-Year Average of Moody's ANPL ($000) $621 $759 $1,136 $1,605 $2,313 Net Direct Debt / Operating Revenues (x) 1.6x 1.9x 1.4x 1.3x 1.3x Net Direct Debt / Full Value (%) 1.8% 2.2% 1.5% 1.4% 1.5% Moody's - adjusted Net Pension Liability (3-yr average) to Revenues (x) 0.2x 0.3x 0.4x 0.6x 0.8x Moody's - adjusted Net Pension Liability (3-yr average) to Full Value (%) 0.3% 0.3% 0.5% 0.6% 0.9% Source: Moody's Investors Service, the village's audited financial statements, US Census Bureau Profile The village of Butler encompasses 0.8 square miles in Waukesha County (Aaa stable), approximately 10 miles northwest of downtown Milwaukee. It provides a full range of municipal services to roughly 1,800 residents. Detailed credit considerations Economy and tax base: small tax base northwest of Milwaukee Butler's tax base and economic profile will remain limited over the long term given minimal opportunities for new development, but its location in the greater Milwaukee area will support long-term stability. The $253.5 million tax base grew at an average annual rate of 1.6% between 2012 and 2017, but remains bellow its pre-recession peak of $262.4 million. Given its small area, growth is due almost exclusively to appreciating real estate values and redevelopment as the village is fully built out. The tax base is a mixture of commercial (42.2% of equalized value), residential (37.6%) and manufacturing and other (20.1%), and is moderately concentrated with the top ten taxpayers accounting for 16.1% of equalized value. The local economy has traditionally been anchored by manufacturing, though residents also benefit from the village's close commuting distance to Milwaukee. Resident income levels are slightly above average, with median family income at 105.2% of the US. Financial operations and reserve: healthy, but nominally small, operating reserves The village s financial profile is expected to remain satisfactory given the recent stabilization of operations, though reserves will remain small on a nominal basis. Following a trend of deficits which resulted in a general fund low in fiscal 2014, reserves grew over the past two years to an available fiscal 2016 general fund balance of $563,000, or 25.5% of revenue. The available operating fund (general and debt service funds) balance improved to $623,000 at the close of fiscal 2016, equivalent to 21.5% of revenues. Unaudited figures for fiscal 2017 reflect a further general fund surplus of $107,000 resulting from police retirements and decreased health care costs. The fiscal 2018 budget is balanced. This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2

LIQUIDITY The village closed fiscal 2016 with a net cash position of $1.4 million, or a healthy 47.8% of revenue. Debt and pension: high fixed costs; modest pension burden Fixed costs will likely remain high due to the village's moderate debt burden and slow principal amortization. Inclusive of an upcoming issue, net direct debt is above average at 1.9% of full value and 1.7x operating revenue. Management reports no plans for additional debt in 2018, but anticipates borrowing $1 million for capital projects in 2019. Fixed costs, inclusive of debt service and pension contributions, were a high 27.2% of operating revenue in fiscal 2016. DEBT STRUCTURE All of the village's debt is fixed rate. Principal amortization is below average with 55.7% of debt retired within ten years. DEBT-RELATED DERIVATIVES The village has no exposure to any debt-related derivatives. PENSIONS AND OPEB Village employees participate in the Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS), a statewide cost-sharing defined benefit pension plan. Moody's single-year adjusted net pension liability (ANPL) for Butler, under our methodology for adjusting reported pension data, was $2.5 million in fiscal 2016, a 30% increase from the fiscal 2014 ANPL of $1.9 million. The increase reflects various factors, including plan asset underperformance relative to plan assumptions and the decline in the discount rate used to calculate the ANPL. Despite the single-year increase in ANPL, the village's three-year average ANPL was modest at 0.9% of full value and just 0.8x fiscal 2016 operating revenue. Village contribution to WRS in fiscal 2016 totaled $75,000, or a modest 2.6% of operating revenue. The ANPL referenced above reflects the allocation of WRS liabilities to participating employers, which is a required reporting standard under GASB effective fiscal 2015. The ANPL is not intended to replace Butler's reported liability information but is used to enhance comparability with other rated entities. Management and governance: moderate institutional framework Careful budgeting and disciplined expense management have contributed to the stabilization of operations in recent years, resulting in strengthened reserves. Butler has a formal policy to maintain fund balance at no less than 10% of budgeted operating expenses, a level it currently exceeds. Wisconsin cities, including villages, have an Institutional Framework score of A, which is moderate. Institutional Framework scores measure a sector's legal ability to increase revenues and decrease expenditures. The sector's major revenue source, property tax revenue, is subject to a cap that restricts cities from increasing their operating property tax levies except to capture amounts represented by net new construction growth. Revenues and expenditures tend to be predictable. Across the sector, fixed and mandated costs are generally high. Expenditures are somewhat flexible, as collective bargaining is allowed for public safety employees but is curbed for non-public safety employees. 3

2018 Moody s Corporation, Moody s Investors Service, Inc., Moody s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ( MIS ) ARE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY S affiliate, Moody s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ( MJKK ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody s SF Japan K.K. ( MSFJ ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ( NRSRO ). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 4 1117701

CLIENT SERVICES 5 Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454