Information Document Offers and Bids ID #[xxxx-xx]

Similar documents
6 Rebalancing Auctions

6 Rebalancing Auctions

This section addresses the specific timeline, format and mechanics for a base auction

Supply Participation. 2.1 Prequalification applications. Rationale

ISO Rules Part 100 General Division 103 Administration Section Capacity Market Financial Security Requirements

Capacity Market Power Mitigation

Information Document Technical Feasibility Exceptions ID # RS

Alberta Capacity Market

1 Overview of the Alberta Capacity Market

Alberta Capacity Market

3 Calculation of Unforced Capacity (UCAP)

Overview of the Forward Capacity Market ( FCM ) ISO New England Inc.

ISO Rules Part 200 Markets Division 203 Energy Market Section Energy Market Mitigation

5.14 Installed Capacity Spot Market Auction and Installed Capacity Supplier Deficiencies LSE Participation in the ICAP Spot Market Auction

4.1 Daily & Hourly Bid Components

{TEXT OMITTED} 6. MARKET POWER MITIGATION. Sixth Revised Volume No. 1

SEMOpx. Operating Procedures: DAM, IDA, IDC. Updated Draft: 09/03/18. Draft prepared for discussion at the BLG meeting, 14 March 2018.

Capacity Performance Transition Incremental Auctions Rules, Schedule and Planning Parameters

Information Document Capacity Market Auction Guidelines ID #[xxxx-xx]

Constellation Energy Comments on Proposed OTC Reforms

ISO Rules Part 300 System Reliability and Operations Division 306 Outages and Disturbances Section Generation Outage Reporting and Coordination

MISO Competitive Retail Solution: Analysis of Reliability Implications

Delisting: Exit of capacity resources from the market. Eligibility WG October 24, 2017

Hello World: Alberta s Capacity Market

Capacity Market Auction User Guide

Information Document FAC-008-AB-3 Facility Ratings ID # RS

Optimal Bidding Strategies in Electricity Markets*

Market Monitoring, Mitigation & Analysis

HEALTH CARE COSTS ARE THE PRIMARY DRIVER OF THE DEBT

Congestion Revenue Rights (CRR)

Monitoring and Mitigation in Alberta s Capacity Market

Capacity Auction: Frequently Asked Questions - Working Document

Commitment Cost Enhancements Second Revised Straw Proposal

Energy Market Power Mitigation. Energy & Ancillary Services Workgroup Meeting 4 June 13, 2018

University of Washington Debt Management Policy Statement of Objectives and Policies. Simplifies history of policy

Local Market Power Mitigation Enhancements discussion

Operational Rules for Day Ahead Market segment (DAM) INDEPENDENT BULGARIAN ENERGY EXCHANGE

PRACTICE DIRECTIVE NO. 3/2017 QUALIFYING CRITERIA FOR AUDIT EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN CATEGORIES OF PRIVATE COMPANIES

Market Power Screens and Mitigation

How to get a CfD: Allocation Process and the Transition from the RO 11/06/14

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

(7) This proposal is submitted for the approval of all National Regulatory Authorities (hereafter referred to as the NRAs ) of the CCR GRIT.

a B Competitive Sealed Proposals b C.1 Procurement not exceeding one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000)

Connect America Fund Summary of Draft Report and Order, FNPRM and Order on Reconsideration Released Nov. 21, 2018

Congestion Revenue Rights (CRR) Clawback Modification. Draft Final Proposal

The Road to the I-SEM

Electricity Power System Planning

ISO Comments on IMAPP

Explanatory note data publication Front Report

Rational Buyer. Ancillary Service Rational Buyer Adjustment. Description. Purpose. Charge Calculation and Calculation Components

Exelon s Price-Based Materiality Screen. PJM CCPPSTF September 11 12, 2017

Review of LADWP Feed-In-Tariff Proposal for City Council

Intertie Deviation Settlement: Draft Final Proposal

Congestion Revenue Rights Settlement Rule

Electricity Market. July 15.

Accelerating CCS development: a project funding mechanism, for demonstration only, built into ETS

2. The Start-Up Cost Curve - this is calculated using the following information:

Business Practice Manual for Congestion Revenue Rights. Version 2019

Alberta Electric System Operator 2017 ISO Tariff Update

Day-ahead Market Regulations. Nord Pool AS

Strategic Bidding in Multi-unit Auctions with Capacity Constrained Bidders: The New York Capacity Market

Entry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement

Capital Reserves and EDA Grants. Department of Education Division of Finance November 28, 2001

Clearing Manager. Financial Transmission Rights. Prudential Security Assessment Methodology. 18 September with September 2015 variation

Construction Rules for Morningstar Indexes

EARNED VALUE AS A RISK ASSESSMENT TOOL

The Entry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement

Subsection Policies (policy #)

Capacity Procurement Mechanism Replacement. Second Revised Draft Straw Proposal

COMMENTS OF NV ENERGY LOCAL MARKET POWER MITIGATION ENHANCEMENTS DRAFT FINAL PROPOSAL DATED JANUARY 31, 2019 CAISO STAKEHOLDER PROCESS

Compensation Rules for Climate Policy in the Electricity Sector

Standards of Practice Practice-Specific Standards for Pension Plans

new. york. independent. system. operator

Generation Production Costs, Scheduling & Operating Rate

DARLINGTON REFURBISHMENT CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS IN RATE BASE

Information Document Energy and Ancillary Services Offsets for Assets ID #[xxxx-xx]

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

PSE&G Solar Loan III Program General Q&A

PJM Analysis. CCPPSTF August 2, PJM 2017

Comparison of Performance-Based Capacity Models in ISO-NE and PJM June 2, 2016

Technical Conference. August 3, 2009

Stepping Through Co-Optimisation

Capacity Markets 101: Understanding Options for Alberta

AEP Ohio Competitive Bidding Process November 2017 Auction

PROPOSAL FOR THE SYSTEM OF TRANSPARENT ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES (STAR) FOR GEF-6

The single fund solution. Continuum Portfolios

Demand Curve Definitions

Energy and Bilateral Transactions

ICAP Willingness To Pay (Demand Curve)

MEMORANDUM The FERC Order on Proposed Changes to ISO-NE s Forward Capacity Market

The Clock-Proxy Auction: A Practical Combinatorial Auction Design

The Role of Risk Allocation in Transaction Design: The Case of Power Distribution

TransAlta Corporation Investor Presentation November 2018

Memorandum. This memorandum requires Board action. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Local Market Power Mitigation Enhancements

ISO/RTO Market Monitoring Structure and Challenges Harvard Electricity Policy Group Sixty-Third Plenary Session

MANAGEMENT RISK INTEGRAL UNIT (UAIR)

Alberta Utilities Commission

CEO Presentation. Curt Morgan Chief Executive Officer

Business Practice Manual For. Generator Management. Version 8

Transcription:

Purpose This section relates to the following Authoritative Documents: Section 06.4 of the ISO rules, for the Market ( Section 06.4 ); and General This document provides additional information for ISO rule 06.4 in the capacity market. (06.4) The allocation of and bid blocks is described in rule 0. Market Allocation and establishes the blocks required for the implementation of this rule. The capacity market participant can up to 7 capacity blocks per asset in a base auction and up to 7 bid and 7 capacity blocks for each asset in all rebalancing aucitons. The minimum capacity block size for all assets is MW and the s and bids must be in MW increments. market participants will be able to indicate whether capacity blocks are flexible or inflexible. Each asset is allocated one inflexible capacity block per asset, other than for capacity assets as described below. The first capacity block in an must be the lowest price capacity block and may be inflexible, all other capacity blocks must be flexible. This option enables capacity market participants to prevent assets that are under development from partial clearing and possibly requiring the capacity market participant to resize the asset. This option also allows capacity market participants to ensure that assets with a minimum stable generation level are able to ensure a minimum level of cleared capacity volume. 4 Base Auction Considerations The AESO requires that all assets must in the capacity auctions. Assets are provided exemptions to the must requirement only after completing a delist request subsequent to ISO rule 0.5, Delisting. The AESO is developing a capacity market auction system through which the capacity market participant will be required to submit s into all auctions. When submitting bids or s in an auction capacity market participants will be required to identify the person with control over the MWs being submitted in each bid or and whether an includes capacity. 5 Rebalancing Auction Considerations The ISO rules governing base auctions will apply to all rebalancing auctions with the following exceptions: No market power mitigation Market power mitigation measures will not apply to rebalancing auctions. Most of the supply and the demand for capacity should be cleared in the base auction; the total volume of capacity that is expected to transact in rebalancing auctions is expected to be small and the risk to price distortion is expected to be minimal. market participant bids market participants that have an existing capacity market obligation will be allowed to submit bids to buy back some or all of the capacity previously sold for that obligation period. 6 Considerations capacity refers to an asset whose maximum capability is increasing by at least MW but does not meet the thresholds of refurbished capacity. Posting Date: xxxx-xx-xx Page of 5 Public

capacity may have a higher cost structure than the existing capacity from the same capacity asset and as such, the AESO allows one inflexible capacity block to be provided for capacity that could be priced higher than the existing capacity from the same asset. The capacity market participant will be allocated one inflexible capacity block for capacity and one inflexible capacity block for the existing capacity of the asset. The capacity market participant will be able to make only one inflexible for either the existing or the capacity. The examples below demonstrate different scenarios of how inflexible capacity block s may be configured: Scenario Offered Y Y Y N Y N - neither or existing has a d inflexible as existing as Scenario N Y Y Y Y N - existing existing capacity has been as Posting Date: xxxx-xx-xx Page of 5 Public

* * N Scenario Y N Y Y Y N - been as been as Scenario 4 Y N Y - Posting Date: xxxx-xx-xx Page of 5 Public

N Y Y been as existing capacity does not have a d inflexible Refurbished capacity Auctions with refurbished capacity s will require a multi-stage clearing process whereby the unmitigated s for refurbished assets which do not clear are added back into the supply curve at their mitigated price and the market clearing process is run again. This process will continue until all refurbished capacity assets have cleared the market or on a mitigated basis. To simplify the auction clearing process, unmitigated refurbished capacity s will be required to be single, inflexible capacity blocks. For example, in the illustration below three assets (A, B and C) submitted prequalification applications for refurbished assets and also submitted s for the non-refurbish capacity to be considered if the refurbished capacity was not cleared. See subsection 6..b. In the example below the auction clearing engine iterates twice, each time determining the unmitigated s that do not clear and replacing them with the mitigated s. In this example a solution is found when the unmitigated from asset C clears in the auction. Posting Date: xxxx-xx-xx Page 4 of 5 Public

Bid content market participants will be able to submit bids into the rebalancing auctions. This will allow market participants to optimize their capacity positions and to manage obligation period risk by reducing existing capacity market obligations. market participants with capacity commitments during a future obligation period will be required to submit bids in rebalancing auctions at a price marginally above the price cap as described by the demand curve when either of the following two conditions exist: - Missed Milestone: market participants developing new generation assets that have a capacity commitment will be required to buy out their obligtation when they fail to meet preestablished milestones. Further information on this requirement can be found in ISO rule 06.5 Forward Period Milestone Assessment and the associated Information Document - Uniform capacity value smaller than capacity commitment in last rebalancing auction: If an asset s capacity commitment is greater than the uniform capacity value of that asset at the time the last rebalancing auction is conducted, the capacity market participant will be required to buy out the uniform capacity value deficit in the last rebalancing auction. Offer window extension In the event an auction can not be completed as planned due to technical events including, an internet failure or a failure of the AESO s capacity market auction system, the AESO may extend the period during which s will be accepted. In the event that this occurs, the AESO will advise participants through the AESO website and, if necessary, through a form of direct communication regarding the new submission period and the reason for the extension. Revision History Posting Date Description of Changes Initial release Posting Date: xxxx-xx-xx Page 5 of 5 Public