FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSES OF A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT IN AVONDALE ESTATES

Similar documents
General Fund Revenue Summary

The Fiscal Impact of the Proposed City of Sharon Springs on Forsyth County, Georgia

Fiscal Capacity of Counties in Georgia

December 7, Feasibility Study for the Proposed City of East Cobb, 2015

Hillsborough County Population and Employment Projections and Allocations DECEMBER 2017

Fiscal Impact Analysis

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY. City of Woodstock. HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d

AUGUST 4, Feasibility Study for the Proposed City of Eagles Landing

Economic Contribution of

ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS:

HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d

Fiscal Impact Analysis of the North Carolina Rural Job Creation Fund

Economic Contribution of

ECONOMIC AND REVENUE IMPACTS

Georgia World Congress Center and Georgia Dome Economic Impact Analysis FY 2012

Economic Contribution

The Economic Capture of the Downtown Phoenix Redevelopment Area. Prepared for:

Report on the City of South Fulton: Potential Revenues and Expenditures

Georgia World Congress Center and Georgia Dome Economic Impact Analysis FY 2016

Fiscal Impact of SunTrust Park and The Battery Atlanta on Cobb County Prepared on behalf of:

Fiscal Analysis November 14, Fiscal Analysis Fiscal Conditions Project Background

CITY OF WARNER ROBINS, GEORGIA ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

This Publica on is produced by the Department of Informa on and Public Affairs and the Fulton County Finance Department. Your Your Service

Economic Contribution of

Economic Contribution of

Market Assessment and Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis of the Cumberland Community Improvement CUMBERLAND CID DECEMBER 2009

Big Chino Water Ranch Project Impact Analysis Prescott & Prescott Valley, Arizona

Economic Contribution of

2016 Cherokee County Millage Rate. Proposed Scenarios June 21, 2016

2017 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY. HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d

Technical Report: Employment

The Projected Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Improvements to Georgia s Historic Rehabilitation Investment Incentive

City of Ann Arbor Treasury Services Unit Matthew V. Horning, Treasurer

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY. Staff Consolidation Report Accessible Version. HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d.

CITY OF STONE MOUNTAIN 875 Main Street Stone Mountain, Georgia ANNEXATION STUDY 2016

WOODBURY PARK E- COMMERCE & DISTRIBUTION CENTER ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS APRIL 29, 2016

APPENDIX P ADDENDUM TO TAX IMPACT/SCHOOL DISTRICT ANALYSIS

Georgia World Congress Center and Georgia Dome Economic Impact Analysis FY 2017

Fiscal Analysis of the City of Palo Alto 2030 Comprehensive Plan

CRISP COUNTY, GEORGIA

Westwood Country Club Redevelopment

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LEGALIZING RETAIL ALCOHOL SALES IN JOHNSON COUNTY

ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT MCDUFFIE COUNTY, GEORGIA YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Memorandum. Background memorandum for Independence/Constitution Project fiscal impact analysis

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY

DESCRIPTIONS OF BUDGET TERMS

CITY OF UNION CITY, GEORGIA

Arizona Low Income Housing Tax Credit and Housing Trust Fund Economic and Fiscal Impact Report

COBB COUNTY GOVERNMENT. A great place to live, work and play. BUDGET AT A GLANCE. Cobb County Expect the Best!

CITY OF CHAMBLEE, GEORGIA

Eldred Preserve Project

ECONOMIC ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES PAPER

Overview Of Municipal Budgeting From Preparation to Execution

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY STAFF CONSOLIDATION REPORT. HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d. Grey County

LEVEL OF SERVICE / COST & REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS

Finance 101. Learning Outcomes

Rockdale County, Georgia

TAUSSIG DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY CITY OF ESCALON. Public Finance Public Private Partnerships Urban Economics Clean Energy Bonds

MKT. Included in both the Russell 2000 & 3000 Indexes

OVER THE PERIOD MARCH 2007 THROUGH APRIL

Fiscal Impacts Appendix

Round 6.4 Cooperative Forecasts of Population, Households, Housing Units and Employment

FY14 Budget. FY15 Request. FY13 Actual. Department Name

TAC CHARRETTE WORKBOOK Financial Component

Ravenna s most significant growth occurred before Between 1960 and 1980 the city s population declined by 8.5%.

City of East Lansing. Financial Forecast FY

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY

Lineberger Connector Project Economic Impact Analysis Summary

Georgia Department of Revenue. February 19, 2018 Local Government Services

2015 and 2040 Land Use for the Greater Thurston-Lewis County Transportation Demand Model

ECONOMIC AND REVENUE IMPACTS

The Economic and Fiscal Impacts of a Cheese Plant and Dairies in the Panhandle of Texas

The American Beverage Licensees Economic Impact Study. Methodology and Documentation Prepared for: American Beverage Licensees

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CHENEY/HAGERTY/KUSHNER TRACT TOWNSHIP OF CRANBURY MIDDLESEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.

Adopted Budget Summary Information Fiscal Year 2019

Highlights. City Commissioners. Peggy Merriss City Manager. Date: May 15, Revised Budget Estimates Proposed Budget Estimates

GEORGIA BONDS. Daniel M. McRae, Partner Seyfarth Shaw LLP 1075 Peachtree Street, N.E. Suite 2500 Atlanta, GA

The current study builds on previous research to estimate the regional gap in

Re: Lanterns Fiscal Impact Analysis. Background. Analysis Process. June 7, Mr. Scott Carlson Carlson Land PO Box 247 East Lake CO 80614

Regional Economic Impact of Cass County, ND and Clay County, MN

Southeastern Pennsylvania and the Commonwealth Budget

CHAPTER 3: GROWTH OF THE REGION

IMPACT OF A SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Preliminary Findings Village of Painted Post and Town of Erwin Shared Services / Consolidation Study

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators Georgia. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

Dr. Laurie Heinz, Superintendent Park Ridge Niles School District 64. Scott Goldstein, AICP & LEED AP, Principal Pete Iosue, AICP, Senior Planner

Santa Clarita Water Division

River Edge Fiscal Impact Analysis

Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan

Harold F. Holtz Municipal Training Institute

FY15 REVENUES. FY 14 Adopted Taxes. General Fund $ $ $753.50

Health Economics Program

Rockdale County Water & Sewer Authority (GA)

2009 Minnesota Tax Incidence Study

SKECHERS HERMOSA BEACH DESIGN CENTER & EXECUTIVE OFFICES

2007 Minnesota Tax Incidence Study

E APPENDIX METHODOLOGY FOR LAND USE PROJECTIONS IN THE BOSTON REGION INTRODUCTION

Crawford County, Ohio

INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 1

Hillsborough County Population and Employment Projections and Allocations DECEMBER 2017

Transcription:

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSES OF A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT IN AVONDALE ESTATES FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Trammell Crow Residential 3715 Northside Pkwy Atlanta, GA 30327 July 16, 2018

Table of Contents Key Results... 1 Fiscal Impact... 1 Qualitative Benefits... 2 Introduction and Background... 3 Data Requirements... 4 Avondale Estates Financial Data... 4 Demographics... 5 Property Values... 6 Project Specific Data... 6 Fiscal Impact Results... 9

Key Results Trammell Crow Residential is planning a multi-family mixed-use development in the City of Avondale Estates in DeKalb County, Georgia. The residential component consists of 286 oneand two-bedroom apartments. The commercial portion consists of 5,000 square feet of restaurant space. This study examines the fiscal impact of this development on the City of Avondale Estates government. Fiscal Impact Scenarios were run with and without inducements, for 10- and 20-year time horizons as shown in Table A1. Both the undiscounted (Gross) total net revenue and the discounted total net revenue (NPV) are included in the table. Net revenues take into account changes in all revenues accruing to the city and all increases in expenditures (service costs) for the city. The inducement is entered as a cost to the city because it represents foregone property taxes over a 10-year period, beginning with 65 percent the first year and ending at 6.5 percent in year 10. In years 11 through 20, all property taxes from the project accrue to the city. Table A1: Results - all Scenarios - Totals for Avondale Estates 10-Year 20-Year Gross Net Revenues without Inducement $1,136,559 $2,273,390 Gross Net Revenues with Inducement $235,262 $1,372,092 Table A2 below displays the sum of property taxes accruing to the city and taxes saved by TCR, over 20 years. All inducement values (Property Tax Benefit to the Company) in Table A2 are based on property values provided. The Property Tax Benefit to the Community values include property taxes from the project as well as property taxes paid by households forecast to be added to the city due to the new jobs. Current property taxes accruing to the city from this property amounted to $5,325 in 2017, from four parcels. Without this development, and by holding property taxes at their current millage, the city would only realize $106,498 in property taxes over 20 years. This is far less than the $4.4 million the city collects with the development going forward and with the inducement in place. Fiscal Impact Analysis Mixed-Use in Avondale Estates Page 1

Table A2: Property Tax Totals over 20 Years City Property Tax Benefit to the Company $901,298 Property Tax Benefit to the Community $4,406,722 Qualitative Benefits During construction of the development, approximately 400 construction workers will spend some of their wages on local businesses including restaurants, retail, and entertainment. From a fiscal standpoint, only sales taxes would be generated directly to the city government and because of the small share the city receives, it would not be significant. However, the additional sales for local establishments would be a substantial benefit to the city s economy. Fiscal Impact Analysis Mixed-Use in Avondale Estates Page 2

Introduction and Background Trammell Crow Residential is proposing a mixed-use development in Avondale Estates, a city in DeKalb County Georgia. The development will add an estimated 286 one- and two-bedroom apartments and 5,000 square feet of restaurant space. The commercial space will add an estimated 24 jobs with six more jobs needed for running and maintaining the residential portion. The fiscal impact of the development on the city s local government derives from a regressionbased model that forecasts a change in local government revenues and expenditures as a result of additional improvements; residential, commercial, and/or industrial. The next section of the report will discuss the data requirements of the model, sources for all data, and how various calculations were made to develop estimates required by the model. The last section presents the fiscal impact results over 10-year and 20-year periods. Construction impacts are not included because they are transitory and from a fiscal impact standpoint, only result in sales tax revenue when items are purchased in DeKalb County and subject to sales tax or when construction workers spend part of their income on taxable items in the county. These amounts are typically small in comparison to other revenue streams generated by the project. Fiscal Impact Analysis Mixed-Use in Avondale Estates Page 3

Data Requirements Avondale Estates Financial Data The fiscal impact model needs a variety of data to run an analysis including a starting point for each local government revenue and expenditure category. These data were obtained from the Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA), which collects annual financial information from every city and county government in Georgia 1. The data is provided to DCA in a format called the Uniform Chart of Accounts (UCA). The major categories used in the model are shown in Table 1 along with three-year averages for the city, the most recent years available from DCA. Table 1: Revenues and Expenditures - Three-Year Average 2014, 2015, 2016 Avondale Estates Per Household Revenues Property Taxes $1,814,798 $1,368 Sales Taxes $168,044 $127 Franchise fees $200,605 $0 Liquor licenses $27,289 $21 Alcohol taxes $27,239 $21 Fines $558,295 $421 Permits $59,977 $45 Services $52,052 $39 Occupational tax $116,065 $87 Insurance Premiums $162,565 $123 Miscellaneous $355,355 $268 Total/Average $3,542,283 $2,669 Expenditures General government $879,153 $663 Health $0 $0 Social welfare $0 $0 Public safety $1,074,005 $809 Courts $88,401 $67 Public works $217,707 $164 Recreation and Library $321,274 $242 Miscellaneous $167,098 $126 Total /Average $2,747,638 $2,071 Source: Georgia Department of Community Affairs website 1 Local government financial data can be found at http://www.dca.ga.gov/rlgf/default.aspx. Fiscal Impact Analysis Mixed-Use in Avondale Estates Page 4

Because of the volatility in several revenue and expenditure categories, the figures in Table 1 are three-year averages. This tends to smooth out the volatility in the data. Demographics Commuting patterns are used to allocate new households expected from the project to Avondale Estates and to areas of the county, as well as outside the county. The source for these estimates is a U.S. Bureau of the Census website called OnTheMap (http://onthemap.ces.census.gov/). Two percentages are calculated from these data, (1) the percent of jobs in the city filled by people who live in the city, and (2), the percent of jobs in the city held by people who live in other areas of the county. Typically, the sum of these two percentages is less than 100 percent because people in-commuting from outside the county hold a portion of the jobs. The two values are below. Percentage of new jobs in the city filled by people who live in the city = 2.8% Percentage of new jobs in the city held by people who commute from the county = 33.7% Based on these percentages county residents hold about 36 percent of jobs in Avondale Estates and people commuting from outside DeKalb County hold nearly 64 percent of the jobs. Population and housing estimates also are needed for the analysis as well as employment and wages, and millage rates. Table 2 displays the population and housing data, and Table 3 contains the employment and wages data. Average wages in the county in 2016 came to $39,760. Item Table 2: Population and Households 2016 Value Total population in Avondale Estates 3,139 Total housing units in Avondale Estates 1,327 Persons per household 2.4 Households per employee 0.802 Source: United States Census Bureau Fiscal Impact Analysis Mixed-Use in Avondale Estates Page 5

Table 3: Jobs and Wages 2016 Item Value Total jobs in the city 1,655 Total wages and salaries for these jobs $64,451,207 Average wages $39,760 Population per job: 1.64 Unemployment rate in DeKalb County (March 2018): 6.10% Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Property Values The Georgia Department of Revenue provides data on property values from its consolidated tax digest 1 database. The model s regression equations use incorporated, unincorporated, and total digest values, as well as population and employment. To use the equations to forecast future values for each revenue and expenditure category, the model needs to calculate the percentage change in the value of residential, commercial, and industrial property. That calculation requires a starting point for each category. Table 4 shows the 2017 digest values required by the model as starting points for the percentage change calculation. Table 4: 2017 Property Values in Avondale Estates Market Value 40% Value Residential improvements $362,725,395 $145,090,158 Commercial improvements $11,081,203 $4,432,481 Industrial improvements $3,987,138 $1,594,855 Source: Georgia Department of Revenue Project Specific Data Project data requirements include investments by type of property (residential, commercial), the number of units by size for multi-family property, the number of new jobs and average pay, and estimates of taxable sales for retail, hotel/motels, or other sales-tax generating businesses, by year. Six jobs are expected for the multi-family development paying an average annual salary 1 Consolidated tax digests can be found at https://etax.dor.ga.gov/digestconsolidation/default.aspx Fiscal Impact Analysis Mixed-Use in Avondale Estates Page 6

of $65,000 and 24 jobs are estimated for the restaurant component paying an average annual salary of $30,000. Total investment in this project is expected to reach $63.3 million. The project should be completed in 2021. No inflation is introduced into this analysis, so this investment value is held constant throughout the forecast. The 286 multi-family units are split between one-bedroom and two-bedroom units. Approximately 185 of the units will be one-bedroom units and 101 two-bedroom units. The inducement offered reduces the property taxes that would have been collected by the city. Although county and school millage are also affected, those impacts are not included in this analysis because only city revenues and expenditures are the subject of this analysis. Table 5 below summarizes the investments, inducement amounts and net property tax accruing to Avondale Estates. Full occupancy is assumed in 2021, which begins, the inducement period. The forecast runs for 20 years from 2021 though 2041. Fiscal Impact Analysis Mixed-Use in Avondale Estates Page 7

Year Table 5: Facility Property Taxes - Developer Savings and Net to the City Real Property 40% Assessed Value 9.957 Mills City Avondale Estates Developer Savings Net to the City 2021 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $163,872 $88,239 2022 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $147,485 $104,626 2023 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $131,098 $121,013 2024 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $114,711 $137,401 2025 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $98,323 $153,788 2026 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $81,936 $170,175 2027 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $65,549 $186,562 2028 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $49,162 $202,950 2029 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $32,774 $219,337 2030 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $16,387 $235,724 2031 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $0 $252,111 2032 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $0 $252,111 2033 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $0 $252,111 2034 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $0 $252,111 2035 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $0 $252,111 2036 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $0 $252,111 2037 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $0 $252,111 2038 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $0 $252,111 2039 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $0 $252,111 2040 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $0 $252,111 2041 $63,300,000 $25,320,000 $252,111 $0 $252,111 Total $901,298 $4,393,038 Fiscal Impact Analysis Mixed-Use in Avondale Estates Page 8

Fiscal Impact Results The fiscal impact analysis was run for the City of Avondale Estates, with and without the inducement. A 10-year time horizon and a 20-year time horizon were used for each scenario. Table 6 contains these results. The statistic used to summarize the project s fiscal impact is the NPV or present value of net revenues (net revenues are total revenues minus total expenditures in each year of the analysis). A three percent real (without inflation) discount rate is used to calculate the NPV. Gross, undiscounted, net revenues over each time period are also shown. Table 6: Results - all Scenarios - Totals for Avondale Estates 10-Year 20-Year Gross Net Revenues without Inducement $1,136,559 $2,273,390 Gross Net Revenues with Inducement $235,262 $1,372,092 All results are in the positive range indicating that the project is fiscally sound for the city. The values in Table 6 are net revenues, which are total revenues offset by the increase in service expenditures forecast for the city due to the increase in population from residential development. Of total revenues, the largest portion comes from property taxes. Table 7 shows total property taxes accruing to the city after accounting for the inducement and the tax benefit to the company due to the inducement. Table 7: Property Tax Totals over 20 Years City Property Tax Benefit to the Company $901,298 Property Tax Benefit to the Community $4,406,722 Current property taxes accruing to the city from this property amounted to $5,325 in 2017, from four parcels. Without this development, and by holding property taxes at their current millage, the city would only realize $106,498 in property taxes over 20 years. This is far less than the $4.4 million the city collects with the development going forward and with the inducement in place. During construction of the development, approximately 400 construction workers will spend some of their wages on local businesses including restaurants, retail, and entertainment. From Fiscal Impact Analysis Mixed-Use in Avondale Estates Page 9

a fiscal standpoint, only sales taxes would be generated directly to the city government and because of the small share the city receives, it would not be significant. However, the additional sales for local establishments would be a substantial benefit to the city s economy. Fiscal Impact Analysis Mixed-Use in Avondale Estates Page 10