New York City Prohibits Discrimination Against The Unemployed and Requires Mandatory Sick Leave

Similar documents
Memorandum. SEC Allows Exclusion of Proxy Access Shareholder Proposal Due to Conflict with Management Proposal. Introduction.

Proposed Amendment to Delaware Law May Increase Pressure for Private Equity-Sponsors to Use Two-Step Merger Structures in Going- Private Transactions

Recent Developments Regarding Potential Pension Liabilities for Private Equity Funds

OCC Releases Guidelines for Heightened Expectations for Bank Risk Governance

Long-Awaited FCPA Guidance is Reportedly Imminent

SEC Staff Issues No-Action Responses With Regard to 18 Proxy Access Shareholder Proposals Challenged on Substantial Implementation Grounds

attorney advertising

I. Notable Updates to ISS s U.S. Proxy Voting Guidelines

The CFTC Adopts Final Rules on the Recordkeeping and Reporting of Historical Swaps

Fund Managers Alert: CFTC Rescinds Exemptions and Expands its Regulations

California Passes Legislation Requiring Placement Agents Who Solicit State Pension Systems to Register as Lobbyists

IRS Establishes Corrections Program to Cure Deferred Compensation Defects Under Code Section 409A

Proposed Regulations Providing Additional Examples of Private Foundation Program-Related Investments

The Final SEC Rule on Political Contributions by Investment Advisers

U.S. Regulators Propose Rules on Incentive-Based Compensation Arrangements at Large Financial Institutions

Current and Year-End Estate Planning Issues

Guidance on New SEC Rating Agency Expert Consent Requirement

Two Federal Bills Regulating Insurance and Reinsurance Are Proposed

SEC Proposes Executive Compensation Clawback Rule. Disclose those recovery policies as an exhibit to their annual reports.

Overview of Final Rules on Recordkeeping and Reporting of Swaps

Attorney General Guidance on the New York Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act

The Supreme Court Requires Deference to Plan Administrator s Interpretation of ERISA Plan Notwithstanding Administrator s Prior Invalid Interpretation

Recent SDNY Opinions Provide Guidance for Foreign Nationals Charged with Violations of the FCPA

Regulation of Private Funds and Their Advisers Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

Renault s Mea Culpa This Week: A Reminder Of What Can Happen When A Company Investigating A Whistleblower Claim Is Misled

CFTC and SEC Adopt New Rules Further Defining Major Swap Participant and Major Security-Based Swap Participant

New York City s Earned Sick Time Act Went Into Effect April 1, 2014

Memorandum. Department of Labor Releases Final Definition of ERISA Fiduciary and Related Conflict of Interest Rules: Groups Move to Challenge in Court

Federal Banking Agencies Revamp Guidance on Leveraged Lending

CROSS BORDER INVESTMENTS AND FINANCINGS. Vivian Lam, Partner, Paul Hastings

c l i e n t m e m o r a n d u m

Memorandum. Combatting Securities Fraud Allegations With 10b5-1 Trading Plans. I. 10b5-1 Plans and Regulatory Requirements.

Safe Time Added to New York City s Earned Sick Time Act

Federal Agencies Revise Proposed Securitization Risk Retention Rules

EARLY CASE ASSESSMENT

TRANSNATIONAL ISSUES IN U.S. TRADE SECRETS LITIGATION

THE FIGHT AGAINST FINANCIAL CRIMES AND ITS EFFECT ON THE CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER

Corban v. USAA: Reinterpreting the Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause

Memorandum. Business Interruption Coverage in Hurricane Harvey s Aftermath. September 7, 2017

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SENATE BILL 454

New York State Paid Family Leave

Insurance Law Alert. In This Issue. Eleventh Circuit Rules in Policyholder s Favor on Occurrence Issue and Contractual Liability Exclusion

Trusts & Estates. Client Alert. Beijing Frankfurt Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich New York São Paulo Singapore Tokyo Washington, DC

Paid Sick Leave Laws: State Comparison Chart

Insurance Law Alert. Two Courts Rule That Reservation Of Rights Does Not Give Rise To Conflict Of Interest

New Legislation Makes San Francisco the First City to Mandate Fully Paid Parental Leave for Employees

OREGON PAID SICK TIME LAW (This law replaces City of Portland Paid Sick Leave Law as of 1/1/2016)

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO HOUSE BILL 2005

SANCTIONS: OVERVIEW, HOT TOPICS AND COMPLIANCE CHALLENGES U.S. SANCTIONS: GENERAL PROHIBITIONS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (OFAC)

AMENDED IN BOARD 04/05/16. Ordinance amending the Police Code to require employers to provide supplemental

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session

Insurance Law Alert. New Jersey Supreme Court Upholds Fairly Debatable Standard as Defense to Insurer Bad Faith

This Alert discusses recent decisions relating to the make whole doctrine, the

California State and City Paid Sick Leave Laws

Insurance Law Alert. Overruling Precedent, California Supreme Court Allows Post-Loss Assignment of Insurance Policies Without Insurer Consent

Insurance Law Alert. In This Issue. They are a very high-class, strategic and impressive firm.

ORDINANCE NUMBER O- (NEW SERIES) DATE OF FINAL PASSAGE

(H.99) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont: (1) Pay inequity has been illegal since President Kennedy signed the

78th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 454

Board of Commissioners of Cook County Page 1 of 7

Alert Memo. Further Changes to Russian Securities Law Aimed at Bringing Liquidity to the Local Market

The Family And Medical Insurance Leave (FAMILY) Act (S. 337/H.R. 947)

FCA AUTHORISED FIRMS REQUIRED TO DISCLOSE POSSIBLE COMPETITION INFRINGEMENTS

BANKRUPTCY ISSUES IN INTERCREDITOR AGREEMENTS. Jeffrey A. Marks SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P.

THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT 29 USCS (2005) TITLE 29. LABOR CHAPTER 28. FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE

Insurance Law Alert. In This Issue. New York Court Of Appeals Rejects Unavailability Exception To Pro Rata Allocation

The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, as amended

CFTC Proposes First Clearing Mandate and Finalizes Phased Compliance Rules

The Family And Medical Insurance Leave (FAMILY) Act (S. 337/H.R. 947)

Reducing Your Litigation Profile Practical Guidance for Mutual Fund Directors

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT:

New York Insurance Holding Company Bill Becomes Law

SEC Approves NASDAQ Corporate Governance Rules

Insurance Law Alert. Eleventh Circuit Rejects Manifestation Trigger for Property Damage Claims

COMPARISON OF FEDERAL FAMILY & MEDICAL LEAVE ACT AND WISCONSIN FAMILY & MEDICAL LEAVE ACT Up to date for changes in federal and state law through 2009

(insert name of product) EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

Jennifer B. Hildebrandt, Partner, Corporate Department, Paul Hastings, Los Angeles Christopher G. Ross, Of Counsel, Paul Hastings, New York

Public Law The Family and Medical Leave Act of To grant family and temporary medical leave under certain circumstances.

THE AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT. Kay H. Hodge, Esquire

Alert Labor & Employment

Insurance Law Alert. Third Circuit Rules That Non-Signatory Is Not Equitably Bound to Arbitrate Insurance Dispute

This Alert discusses recent decisions relating to the enforcement of arbitration

LOCAL LAWS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK FOR THE YEAR No. 46 A LOCAL LAW

Qualified Opportunity Zones & Energy Projects: New Tax Incentives

Drafting Standstills in Intercreditor Agreements: Junior Lienholder Standstill Periods and Secured Creditor Remedies

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 3087

Alert Memo. Directors Remuneration Reforms in the United Kingdom: UK Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 Published

On June 22, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC ) adopted

Arizona s Proposition 206

Insurance Law Alert. In This Issue. New York Court Rules That Fraudulent Wire Transfer Losses Are Covered By Liability Policy

SEC Adopts Final Mine Safety Disclosure Rules

EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY COVERAGE PART TABLE OF CONTENTS

IFLR Indonesia Forum: Debt Capital Markets

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Senator ROBERT M. GORDON District 38 (Bergen and Passaic)

ROBERT G. ALEXANDER WEBINAR SERIES October 19, 2016

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PERSONNEL COMMISSION. 812 LAWS AND RULES (Reissue) March 2, 1987

Disability Benefits & Employment Leave Laws

Summary SIDLEY UPDATE

On February 13, 2012, the Obama administration released its proposed budget

CITY OF LOS ANGELES RULES AND REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING THE MINIMUM WAGE ORDINANCE REFLECTS ALL REVISIONS THROUGH MARCH 14, 2017

Transcription:

New York City Prohibits Discrimination Against The Unemployed and Requires Mandatory Sick Leave June 28, 2013 Introduction Employers in New York City should take note of two recent initiatives by the New York City Council to expand workers rights. The first is a new law that amends the New York City Human Rights Law to make it unlawful for employers to discriminate against individuals on the basis of unemployment. The law went into effect on June 11, 2013. In addition, this week the City Council overrode Mayor Bloomberg s veto and enacted the Earned Sick Time Act, which requires employers to provide a minimum amount of sick leave to employees, in most cases with pay. The law will go into effect no earlier than April 1, 2014 (potentially later depending on a formula tied to an economic index). Below is a summary of the new laws. Amendment to NYC Human Rights Law Prohibiting Discrimination Against the Unemployed Protected Status An individual is protected from discrimination on the basis of his or her unemployment status. The terms unemployed or unemployment are defined as: Not having a job; Being available for work; and Seeking employment. Definition of employer The prohibitions of the new law apply to employers, employment agencies, or agents that employ at least four persons. Persons include independent contractors who are not themselves employers. Prohibited Conduct Under the new law, an employer cannot base an employment decision (regarding hiring, compensation or the terms, conditions or privileges of employment) on an applicant s unemployment. In addition, an employer must refrain from including certain phrases in an advertisement for any job vacancy in New York City, unless otherwise permitted by city, state or federal law. The advertisement must not contain: Any provision stating or indicating that current employment is a requirement or qualification for the job; or Any provision stating or indicating that the employer will not consider individuals for employment based on their unemployment.

Exceptions to Prohibited Conduct Notwithstanding the foregoing prohibitions, an employer is permitted to: Consider an applicant s unemployment where there is a substantially job-related reason for doing so (e.g., when breaks in employment may affect licensure required for the job); Ask about the circumstances of an applicant s separation from the prior employment; Consider for employment or give priority to applicants currently employed by the employer; and Set compensation or terms or conditions of employment based on a person s actual amount of experience. When making employment decisions or advertising for vacancies, an employer can still consider any substantially job-related qualifications, including but not limited to: A current and valid professional or occupational license; A certificate, registration, permit, or other credential; A minimum level of education or training; or A minimum level of professional, occupational, or field experience. Disparate Impact Claims The new law also provides for disparate impact claims, setting forth the following framework. Prima Facie Case: The plaintiff must demonstrate that an otherwise lawful policy or practice, or a group of policies or practices, resulted in a disparate impact on unemployed individuals. (If alleging a group of policies or practices, the plaintiff is not required to identify a specific policy or practice.) Affirmative Defense: The employer can plead and prove that the challenged policy or practice (1) is based on a substantially job-related qualification (including those listed above), or (2) does not contribute to the disparate impact. Alternative Policy: The plaintiff must produce substantial evidence that an alternative policy or practice works just as well with less disparate impact. Alternative Policy Insufficient: The employer can rebut by proving that the alternative policy practice would not serve it as well. Enforcement Either an aggrieved individual or the New York City Commission on Human Rights may bring a claim of discrimination under the new law. An individual may file a direct action in court or a complaint with the Commission. Remedies in court could include back and front pay, injunctive relief, punitive damages and attorneys fees. The Commission could fine a violating employer up to $125,000 per violation, or $250,000 for willful discrimination, as well as awarding back and front pay and injunctive relief. Earned Sick Time Act Requiring Mandatory Sick Leave Coverage The Earned Sick Time Act applies to virtually all private sector employers in New York City and provides job-protected sick leave to full-time and part-time employees who work more than 80 hours in a calendar year. Page 2

The Act does not apply to employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement that provides for comparable benefits and waives rights under the Act, or to employees in the construction or grocery industry covered by a collective bargaining agreement containing a waiver of rights. Notably, the Act does not affect employers who already provide comparable time off. An employer is not required to provide additional sick time under the Act if it provides time off (including vacation, sick, personal or similar leave) sufficient to meet the requirements of the Act and allows such time off to be used for the same purposes and under the same conditions as set forth in the Act. Employers who currently provide time off may need to adjust their policies when the Act takes effect to cover part-time employees and to comply with the usage, accrual and carryover requirements, discussed further below. Sick Time Requirements and Accrual Under the Act, an employee accrues 1 hour of sick time for every 30 hours worked, capped at 40 hours of sick time per year. Employees begin accruing sick time upon commencement of employment or on the effective date of the law, whichever is later, and are permitted to use accrued time 120 days later. After that, employees may use sick time as it accrues, and employers may set a reasonable minimum use increment of no greater than 4 hours. A domestic worker is entitled to sick time only after one year of work with the same employer and such leave is capped at 2 days per year. The chart below sets forth the requirements for annual paid and unpaid leave. Threshold Paid or Unpaid Sick Time Requirements 20 or more employees Paid leave Up to 40 hours/year 15-19 employees Unpaid leave, then paid leave 18 months after law takes effect Up to 40 hours/year 14 or less employees Unpaid leave Up to 40 hours/year 1 or more domestic worker Paid leave 18 months after law takes effect Up to 2 days/year (in addition to 3 paid rest days under New York s Domestic Workers Bill of Rights) Carryover Any unused sick time must be carried over to the next year, although an employer is not required to allow the use of more than 40 hours of sick time in a calendar year. In addition, an employer can avoid carryover of unused paid sick time if the employer agrees to: Pay any unused sick time at the end of the year in which it was accrued; and Provide the employee with 40 hours of paid sick time the first day of the next year. An employer is not required to pay for unused sick time upon termination of employment. Page 3

Use of Sick Time Employees may use sick time for absence from work due to: Mental or physical illness, injury or health condition, need for medical diagnosis, care or treatment, or need for preventive medical care; Care of a family member who needs medical diagnosis, care or treatment of a mental or physical illness, injury or health condition or who needs preventive medical care; or Closure of the employee s place of business by order of a public official due to a public health emergency or employee s need to care for a child whose school has been closed for a public health emergency. Notice and Documentation Employers must give written notice at the commencement of employment of the employee s rights under the law. An employer may require reasonable advance notice of up to seven days of the employee s need to use sick time, or notice as soon as practicable when the need is not foreseeable. An employer also may require reasonable documentation from a health care provider for absences of more than three consecutive work days. Employers must retain compliance records for two years. Enforcement An aggrieved employee can file a complaint with the Department of Consumer Affairs, but there is no right to bring a private civil action. Penalties for violations include: three times the wages that should have been paid for used sick time (or a minimum of $250); $500 for each instance of sick time unlawfully denied by the employer; and, in cases of unlawful discharge, lost wages, benefits, a $2500 penalty, and equitable relief including reinstatement. Employers also may be fined up to $500 for the first violation and up to $1,000 for subsequent violations, and willful violations of the notice requirements can result in fines of $50 per employee. * * * In light of these developments, employers should review their application and interview procedures, personnel policies and employee handbooks. For assistance or further information, please contact J. Scott Dyer or Julie Levy of the Firm s Labor and Employment Group. J. Scott Dyer 212-455-3845 jdyer@stblaw.com Julie Levy 212-455-2569 jlevy@stblaw.com Page 4

This memorandum is for general information purposes and should not be regarded as legal advice. Please contact your relationship partner if we can be of assistance regarding these important developments. The names and office locations of all of our partners, as well as our recent memoranda, can be obtained from our website, www.simpsonthacher.com. The contents of this publication are for informational purposes only. Neither this publication nor the lawyers who authored it are rendering legal or other professional advice or opinions on specific facts or matters, nor does the distribution of this publication to any person constitute the establishment of an attorney-client relationship. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP assumes no liability in connection with the use of this publication. Page 5

UNITED STATES New York 425 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017 +1-212-455-2000 Houston 2 Houston Center 909 Fannin Street Houston, TX 77010 +1-713-821-5650 Los Angeles 1999 Avenue of the Stars Los Angeles, CA 90067 +1-310-407-7500 Palo Alto 2475 Hanover Street Palo Alto, CA 94304 +1-650-251-5000 Washington, D.C. 1155 F Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 +1-202-636-5500 EUROPE London CityPoint One Ropemaker Street London EC2Y 9HU England +44-(0)20-7275-6500 ASIA Beijing 3919 China World Tower 1 Jian Guo Men Wai Avenue Beijing 100004 China +86-10-5965-2999 Hong Kong ICBC Tower 3 Garden Road, Central Hong Kong +852-2514-7600 Seoul West Tower, Mirae Asset Center 1 26 Eulji-ro 5-gil, Jung-gu Seoul 100-210 Korea +82-2-6030-3800 Tokyo Ark Hills Sengokuyama Mori Tower 9-10, Roppongi 1-Chome Minato-Ku, Tokyo 106-0032 Japan +81-3-5562-6200 SOUTH AMERICA São Paulo Av. Presidente Juscelino Kubitschek, 1455 São Paulo, SP 04543-011 Brazil +55-11-3546-1000 097777-0167-14902-Active.14082277.106/28/2013 2:40 PM www.simpsonthacher.com