Axioma Research Paper No. 051

Similar documents
Axioma Insight Quarterly Risk Review

Axioma s Equity Factor Risk Model Suite

More than Just a Second Risk Number:

Managing Investment Risk for Nonprofit Organizations

Axioma s new Multi-Asset Class (MAC) Risk Monitor highlights recent trends in market and portfolio

Index Return Monitor. January 11, 2017

Global. Market Review. November David Bassanese, Chief Economist

PERFORMANCE STUDY 2013

What are the types of risk in a nonprofit portfolio?

Risk Has Trended Down... So Should I Be Nervous?

Proprietary Research. Monthly Insights. February 2019

Smart Beta Dashboard. Thoughts at a Glance. March By the SPDR Americas Research Team

Managers who primarily exploit mispricings between related securities are called relative

Key Commodity Themes. Maxwell Gold Director of Investment Strategy. Gradient Investments Elite Advisor Forum October 5 th, 2017

Smart Beta Dashboard. Thoughts at a Glance. June By the SPDR Americas Research Team

The Current Risk Landscape. Axioma Insight Findings Melissa R. Brown, CFA

Q MARKETS REVIEW

Smart Beta Dashboard. Thoughts at a Glance. January By the SPDR Americas Research Team

Proprietary Research. Monthly Insights. December 2018

Pension and Savings Program Investment Review as of December 31, 2017

Endowment Investment Review as of December 31, 2016

Axioma United States Equity Factor Risk Models

The 2018 outlook for fixed income: Balancing the secular and cyclical trends. For institutional use only. Not for distribution to retail investors.

The Challenges to Market-Timing Strategies and Tactical Asset Allocation

Stress Testing Best Practices

CUSTOM HYBRID RISK MODELS. Jason MacQueen Newport, June 2016

PERSPECTIVES. Multi-Asset Investing Diversify, Different. April 2015

P R E S E N T S. U.S. Economic Outlook Virtuous Growth

Dynamic Asset Allocation for Practitioners Part 1: Universe Selection

How to be Factor Aware

Introducing BlackRock's Target Allocation ETF Models

3. Global market returns (6 months) 4. Global market returns (1 week) 5. Global Market Risk and Return AU HU ID TH ZA CA NL DK IE MY BE CO PH LU PE

Investing in the Second Lost Decade. IFTA Europe Martin J. Pring. Pring.com. PringTurner.com

Pension Investment Review as of September 30, 2017

STRATEGY INSIGHT EUROPEAN LONG/SHORT

STRATEGIC MONEY MANAGEMENT

HSBC North America Holdings Inc Mid-Cycle Company-Run Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results. Date: September 15, 2014

Stress Testing using Factor Risk Models in Axioma Portfolio Analytics

HSBC North America Holdings Inc Mid-Cycle Company-Run Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results. Date: July 16, 2015

Investment Cost Effectiveness Analysis Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global

Global Macro & Managed Futures Strategies: Flexibility & Profitability in times of turmoil.

The Market Navigator N a v i g a t i n g t h r o u g h t h e S e a s o f C h a n g e

Economic and Financial Markets Monthly Review & Outlook Detailed Report January 2018

Fourth Quarter 2015 Market Review. March 2016

Endowment Investment Review as of March 31, 2017

HSBC North America Holdings Inc Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review and Annual Company-Run Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results

Working Capital Investment Review as of December 31, 2016

Risk Parity and the Four Faces of Risk

Capital Markets Review 2nd Quarter 2018 June 30, 2018

Real-Time Macroeconomic Monitoring

Macroeconomic conditions and equity market volatility. Benn Eifert, PhD February 28, 2016

Investment Review 2012

HSBC North America Holdings Inc Mid-Cycle Company-Run Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results. Date: October 9, 2018

Gross Domestic Product (Measure of Economic Activity)

State Street Global Advisors SPDR ETFs Chart Pack

Lazard Insights. Interpreting Active Share. Summary. Erianna Khusainova, CFA, Senior Vice President, Portfolio Analyst

TMRS Quarterly Summary. Period Ended: December 31, 2015

2017: Factor Performance in Review

Eric C. Elbell, CFA, CAIA Area Senior Vice President. Kyongdo Min, CPA, CFA Area Vice President. April 11, 2018

University of Colorado at Boulder Leeds School of Business Dr. Roberto Caccia

Economic Capital Based on Stress Testing

Default Fund and Stress Testing

Economic and Financial Markets Monthly Review & Outlook Detailed Report October 2017

Axioma Case Study. Enhancing the Investment Process with a Custom Risk Model. September 26, 2013

ECONOMIC AND MARKET COMMENTARY OUR MISSION

Quantitative Measure. February Axioma Research Team

THE MONTHLY RESEARCH CONFERENCE CALL ENERGY: SECTOR OUTLOOK AND INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITES ARGUS MODERATOR. Jim Kelleher, CFA Director of Research

Real-Time Nowcasting. Francis X. Diebold University of Pennsylvania. July 12, 2011

Real-Time Macroeconomic Monitoring

H1 2018: First Half of 2018

Investment Perspectives. From the Global Investment Committee

RenMac 2016 Outlook Call

Turning Negative Into Nothing:

Axioma Risk Monitor UK Edition 30 January 2019

Playing The Bull Market s Final Inning(s)

Axioma Global Multi-Asset Class Risk Model Fact Sheet. AXGMM Version 2.0. May 2018

2016 NCRS Asset Liability Study: Phase 2

US Business Cycle Risk Report

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc Dodd-Frank Act Mid-Cycle Stress Test Results. September 16, 2013

What's in Your ETF Portfolio?

State Street Global Advisors SPDR ETFs Chart Pack

INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENT & FIDUCIARY SERVICES: Investment Basics: Is Active Management Still Worth the Fees? By Joseph N. Stevens, CFA INTRODUCTION

Vanguard Global Capital Markets Model

Capital Markets Review 4th Quarter 2016 December 31, 2016

Nationwide Fiduciary Series SM Important Disclosures

Summit Strategies Group 8182 Maryland Avenue, 6th Floor St. Louis, Missouri Monthly Economic & Capital Market Update

Deutsche Bank Annual Report

Introducing Macroeconomic Based Stress Testing

Experienced investment management

North Carolina Supplemental Retirement Plans Annual Review. March 2012

[ ] WEEKLY CHANGES AGAINST THE USD. » The Bank of England raised its benchmark interest rate to its highest level in MACRO & MARKET COMMENTARY

Capital Markets Charts 2004 Series

ASSET ALLOCATION: DECISIONS & STRATEGIES

Turkey / Markets Research 11 January 2018

State Street Global Advisors SPDR ETFs Chart Pack

FIXED INCOME UPDATE 1

Capital Market Review & Outlook

PART B STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DATED APRIL 30, 2018 ADVISOR SHARES INSTITUTIONAL SHARES SERVICE SHARES

Understanding the S&P 500 this index offers a lot of international exposure

Chart 1: Dow Jones Industrial Average. Chart 2: Dow Jones Transportation Average

Transcription:

Axioma Research Paper No. 051 April 30, 2014 Axioma s Macroeconomic Model: Insights into equity portfolios from a new perspective Melissa Brown, CFA Senior Director, Applied Research Axioma s recently released macroeconomic based model provides a way to measure and manage financial risk in a U.S. portfolio by considering macroeconomic variables and events. The model s horizon is three to six months what we deem to be medium horizon. The Macro model joins four other model variants already offered by Axioma: two fundamental models and two statistical models, each offered for both a medium and a short (one to two month) horizon. www.axioma.com

1 Axioma s Macroeconomic Model: Insights into equity portfolios from a new perspective Author: Melissa Brown, Senior Director, Applied Research April 2014 Axioma s recently released macroeconomic based model provides a way to measure and manage financial risk in a U.S. portfolio by considering macroeconomic variables and events. The model s horizon is three to six months what we deem to be medium horizon. The Macro model joins four other model variants already offered by Axioma: two fundamental models and two statistical models, each offered for both a medium and a short (one to two month) horizon. Why should you consider using a macro model? The model offers new insights that result from a unique and different view of potential drivers of portfolio volatility and returns. For example, you can: Evaluate a portfolio s sensitivities to macroeconomic variables, see if there are hidden biases, and/or confirm that the portfolio reflects macroeconomic views Decompose risk beyond, or in addition to, traditional fundamental factors Perform factor based attribution to see how macro factors impacted portfolio total or excess returns ex post Stress test a portfolio to see how it might respond to macroeconomic events, such as a shift in yield curves or an increase in the price of oil, or see how the current portfolio would have behaved in historical economic scenarios Axioma s Macroeconomic model produces unbiased risk forecasts. In other words, it does not systematically under or over predict risk. It is updated daily using a technique that converts economic factors reported monthly or quarterly, with a lag, to daily returns that reflect only new news. The dynamic factor model uses many macroeconomic data series to capture a comprehensive view of the impact of economic variables. The model also incorporates market traded variables and some basic fundamental factors. In Table 1, we list the model s factors, data sources, and how they should be interpreted.

2 Table 1: Macroeconomic Model Components Category/Factor Data Interpretation Core Macro Factors Economic Growth Inflation Confidence Market Traded Macro Factors Commodity Oil Gold Term Spread Credit spread FX basket Equity Factors Equity market Equity Value Equity Size Sector Factors (10) Industrial production, capacity utilization, Savings rates, retail sales, etc. PPI, CPI, PCE deflator, etc. Consumer confidence index, ISM PMI survey, strength in USD S&P GSCI non energy spot index Spot price of West Texas Intermediate crude S&P GSCI Gold spot index Yields of 10 year and 13 week US Treasuries BAA and AAA rated US corporate bonds Basket of currencies defined by the IMF SDR portfolio Axioma fundamental model market factor Axioma fundamental model Value factor Axioma fundamental model Size factor Axioma industry returns Change in expectation of yearover year growth in Industrial Production Change in expectation of yearover year growth in inflation Unexpected changes in consumer confidence Return Return in excess of the commodity factor return Return in excess of the commodity factor return A positive factor return represents a widening of the spread A positive factor return represents a widening of the spread Return in US dollars Market return in excess of the economic growth factor return Return to a portfolio with unit exposure to Value and no net exposure to other factors Return to a portfolio with unit exposure to Size and no net exposure to other factors Cap weighted aggregate return of industries in the 10 GICS sectors in excess of the style and market factors

3 It is important to emphasize that the factor exposures are intuitive. For example, a portfolio overweight oil stocks should have a positive exposure to the oil factor (so if oil prices go up the portfolio benefits). In Table 2 we present the exposures of a number of different ETFs, along with the inter decile range of exposures that might be expected. This table illustrates many intuitive exposures. As you can see, Bank ETFs have negative exposures to inflation (they will be hurt if inflation unexpectedly rises), whereas oilrelated ETFs have quite positive inflation exposures. Table 2: Sample ETF Exposures Factor ETF Exposure Comparison Exposure Percentiles KRE (Reg. Banks) KBE (Banks) ICF (REITS) ITB (Home Con.) XHB (Builders) IEO (Oil/Gas) IEZ (Oil Eq) 10th 90th Core Macro Confidence 1.10 1.14 1.41 0.76 0.94 0.45 0.12 1.00 1.20 Economic Growth 6.26 6.07 7.47 6.88 6.45 6.19 6.76 2.00 7.00 Inflation 1.88 1.66 1.96 1.33 1.07 2.31 2.55 1.20 1.80 Market Traded Macro Commodity 0.07 0.09 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.10 0.11 0.13 0.13 Credit Spread 3.44 3.79 4.51 0.26 1.23 0.58 0.75 5.50 4.30 FX Basket 0.37 0.45 0.41 0.10 0.03 0.44 0.55 0.40 0.40 Gold 0.07 0.09 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.10 0.10 Oil 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.07 Term Spread 1.55 1.96 3.91 1.59 1.36 0.00 0.94 2.00 2.00 Green indicates an ETF s exposure is above the 90 th percentile and red indicates an ETF s exposure is below the 10 th percentile. Percentiles are as of November 30, 2013 Application Example 1: Performance Attribution Assessing how macroeconomic factors drive portfolio returns using the macro model for factor attribution is useful. In Table 3, we show attribution results for a sample large cap core portfolio with a Russell 1000 benchmark. The portfolio beat its benchmark by more than 1% per year from 2009 2013. What drove those active returns? We can see that the portfolio had positive bets on all three core macro factors, as well as on both Equity Market and Equity Value. While most of the bets paid off, a positive exposure to inflation hurt returns. The manager may want to determine if these bets were deliberate and, if not, try to find a way to reduce the exposures.

4 Table 2: US Macroeconomic Model Factor Attribution Example, 2009 2013 Annualized Return Contribution Risk Active 1.18% 3.13% Specific Return 0.82% 2.54% Factor Contribution 2.00% 1.65% Core Macro 1.11% 1.38% Market Traded Macro 0.07% 0.38% Equity 1.08% 0.66% Sector 0.12% 0.34% Factor Core Macro Annualized Return Contribution Avg. Exposure Confidence 0.44% 0.08 Economic Growth 1.18% 0.16 Inflation 0.51% 0.13 Market Traded Macro Commodity 0.04% 0.01 Credit Spread 0.00% 0.06 FX Basket 0.02% 0.01 Gold 0.17% 0.02 Oil 0.05% 0.00 Term Spread 0.06% 0.02 Equity Market Equity Market 0.51% 0.05 Equity Size 0.00% 0.01 Equity Value 0.58% 0.20 Application Example 2: Stress Testing The macro model can also be used to test assumptions about market events to assess the impact on a portfolio s total or active returns. For example, how would a big shock, such as an increase in credit spreads of 1%, affect portfolio returns? Figure 1 depicts the impact on the total risk estimates of the Russell 1000 and Russell 2000 of various shocks. The same tests could be run on active returns.

5 Figure 1: Impact of Large Factor Movements The stress testing capability can also be used to see how a portfolio with current factor exposures would have performed in a specific time period. For example, how might a portfolio with the current factor exposures have fared in September 2008? To summarize, Axioma s Macroeconomic model allows you to examine the decomposition of daily risk (or active risk) in a portfolio along macroeconomic lines. Further analysis may include attributing performance to those exposures, stress testing the impact of changes in the returns to those exposures, and determining how the portfolio might react to situations that have occurred in the past. The new Macroeconomic model adds to Axioma s range of tools that provide a better understanding of the risks associated with your portfolio choices.