Standard Development Timeline

Similar documents
A. Introduction. B. Requirements and Measures

A. Introduction. 1. Title: Event Reporting. 2. Number: EOP-004-3

Drafting team considers comments, makes conforming changes on fourth posting

A. Introduction. C. Measures. Standard CIP-001-2a Sabotage Reporting

Unofficial Comment Form Emergency Operations EOP-004-4

Standard Development Timeline

10-day Formal Comment Period with a 5-day Additional Ballot (if necessary), pursuant to a Standards Committee authorized waiver.

Project Disturbance and Sabotage Reporting

45-day Comment and Initial Ballot day Final Ballot. April, BOT Adoption. May, 2015

1. Title: Qualified Transfer Path Unscheduled Flow (USF) Relief

FAC Facility Interconnection Studies

BAL-002-2(i) Disturbance Control Standard Contingency Reserve for Recovery from a Balancing Contingency Event

BAL Disturbance Control Standard Contingency Reserve for Recovery from a Balancing Contingency Event

Standard INT Interchange Initiation and Modification for Reliability

Standard Development Timeline

Background Information:

Standard Development Timeline

August 17, 2017 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. Veronique Dubois Régie de l'énergie Tour de la Bourse 800, Place Victoria Bureau 255 Montréal, Québec H4Z 1A2

Standard PRC-004-3(x) Protection System Misoperation Identification and Correction

3. Purpose: To specify the quantity and types of Contingency Reserve required to ensure reliability under normal and abnormal conditions.

3. Purpose: To specify the quantity and types of Contingency Reserve required to ensure reliability under normal and abnormal conditions.

Standard FAC Facility Ratings. A. Introduction

PRC Remedial Action Schemes

Future Development Plan:

2017 Metrics with Historical Data

Standard BAL Real Power Balancing Control Performance

Paragraph 81 Project Technical White Paper

NERC Reliability Standards Project Updates (August 23, Updated)

Violation Risk Factor and Violation Severity Level Justifications Project Emergency Operations

Project Interpersonal Communications Capabilities COM Industry Webinar January 27, 2016

NERC TPL Standard Overview

BAL Background Document. August 2014

Effective for SERC Region applicable Registered Entities on the first day of the first calendar quarter after approved by FERC.

Re: Analysis of NERC Standard Process Results, Fourth Quarter 2013 Docket Nos. RR , RR

Newfoundland. Brunswick R1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

EXCERPTS from the SAMS-SPCS SPS Technical Reference

BEFORE THE RÉGIE DE L'ÉNERGIE THE PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC

ReliabilityFirst Regional Criteria 1. Operating Reserves

BAL Disturbance Control Performance - Contingency Reserve for Recovery from a Balancing Contingency Event Standard Background Document

A. Introduction. Standard MOD Flowgate Methodology

NORTH AMERICAN ELECTRIC RELIABILITY CORPORATION DEFINITIONS USED IN THE RULES OF PROCEDURE APPENDIX 2 TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE

Approved Business Plan and Budget. Florida Reliability Coordinating Council, Inc.


2017 Business Plan and Budget. Texas Reliability Entity, Inc. Approved by Texas RE Board of Directors. Date:, 2016

Standard BAL Real Power Balancing Control Performance

Implementation Plan Project PRC-005 FERC Order No. 803 Directive PRC-005-6

The second effective date allows entities time to comply with Requirements R1, R2, R4, R5, R6, and R7.

2018 ERO Enterprise Metrics

Risk Assessment & Mitigation. FRCC Fall Compliance Workshop November 10 12, 2015

130 FERC 61,185 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ADDRESSING COMPLIANCE FILING AND APPROVING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Paragraph 81 Criteria

BES Definition Implementation Guidance

April 6, 2018 VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL. Sheri Young, Secretary of the Board National Energy Board th Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2R 0A8

APPENDIX 4D TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE

Violation Risk Factor and Violation Severity Level Justifications Project Modifications to BAL

Standard INT Interchange Transaction Implementation

Procedure for ERO Support of Frequency Response and Frequency Bias Setting Standard

WECC Process for Risk-Based Compliance Oversight Inherent Risk Assessment and Compliance Oversight Plan

Approved Business Plan and Budget. Florida Reliability Coordinating Council, Inc.

APPENDIX 4D TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE

ATTACHMENT E. Page 1 of 8 REAL POWER BALANCING CONTROL PERFORMANCE

May 13, 2009 See Implementation Plan for BAL-005-1

145 FERC 61,141 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. 18 CFR Part 40. [Docket No. RM ; Order No.

FINAL Business Plan and Budget. Florida Reliability Coordinating Council, Inc. Approved by: FRCC Board of Directors

Implementation Plan Project PRC-005 FERC Order No. 803 Directive PRC-005-6

2019 Business Plan and Budget. Texas Reliability Entity, Inc. Approved by Texas RE Board of Directors

May 13, 2016 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. Veronique Dubois Régie de l'énergie Tour de la Bourse 800, Place Victoria Bureau 255 Montréal, Québec H4Z 1A2

Violation Risk Factor and Violation Severity Level Justifications Project Modifications to CIP Standards

March 16, 2009 TO: INDUSTRY STAKEHOLDERS. Ladies and Gentlemen:

Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program Quarterly Report

WECC S ta n d a rd P RC WECC-1 P ro te c tio n S ys tem an d R e m ed ia l Actio n S ch e m e Mis o p eratio n

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) )

WECC Criterion TPL-001-WECC-CRT-3.1

162 FERC 61,020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. 18 CFR Part 40. [Docket No. RM ; Order No.

Ken Gartner, CMEP Process Principal November 28, 2017

SERC Reliability Corporation Business Plan and Budget

WECC Compliance Presentation to the WIRAB

Significant negative consequences of the proposed standard include but are not limited to: 1) The proposed language moves this project from being a

Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program Report

NPCC Regional Reliability Reference Directory # 5 Reserve

Compliance Update. Doug Johnson ATC Customer Meeting May 24, Helping to keep the lights on, businesses running and communities strong

WECC Standard BAL-STD Operating Reserves

Standard MOD Flowgate Methodology

NERC 2013 Business Plan and Budget Overview. May 3, 2012

SERC Reliability Corporation Business Plan and Budget

Violation Risk Factor and Violation Severity Level Justifications Project Modifications to CIP Standards

ERO Enterprise CMEP Practice Guide: Phased Implementation Plans with Completion Percentages March 24, 2017

BAL Frequency Response & Frequency Bias Setting Standard

DRAFT Business Plan and Budget. Approved by: MRO Board of Directors. Date May 4June 28, 2012

May 31, 2016 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. Ms. Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20426

2016 Business Plan and Budget

Transmission Planning Standards Industry Webinar: Footnote b. January 8, 2012 John Odom, FRCC, Standard Drafting Team Chair

CONTROL AREA SERVICES AND OPERATIONS TARIFF OTTER TAIL POWER COMPANY

Shared Business Plan and Budget Assumptions NERC and the Regional Entities Planning Period

BEFORE THE ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO

2014 Business Plan and Budget. Texas Reliability Entity, Inc. Approved by Texas RE Board of Directors

Procedure for ERO Support of Frequency Response and Frequency Bias Setting Standard

2018 Business Plan and Budget Southwest Power Pool Regional Entity. Approved by SPP Regional Entity Trustees

4.1 Transmission Owners that maintain the transmission paths in Attachment B.

NORMES DE FIABILITÉ DE LA NERC - BAL (VERSION ANGLAISE)

Transcription:

Standard Development Timeline This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes effective. Description of Current Draft EOP-004-4 is being posted for a 45-day formal comment period with ballot. Completed Actions Standards Committee approved Standard Authorization Request (SAR) for posting Date 07/15/2015 SAR posted for comment 07/21/2015 08/19/2015 45-day formal comment period with ballot 07/25/2016 09/08/2016 45-day formal comment period with additional ballot 11/18/2016 01/06/2016 Anticipated Actions Date 45-day formal comment period with ballot 07/25/2016 09/08/2016 45-day formal comment period with additional ballot 09/26/2016 11/09/2016 10-day final ballot 1201/0111/2016 2017 1201/1220/20162017 NERC Board (Board) adoption February 2017 July November 2016 Page 1 of 19

New or Modified Term(s) Used in NERC Reliability Standards This section includes all new or modified terms used in the proposed standard that will be included in the Glossary of Terms Used in NERC Reliability Standards upon applicable regulatory approval. Terms used in the proposed standard that are already defined and are not being modified can be found in the Glossary of Terms Used in NERC Reliability Standards. The new or revised terms listed below will be presented for approval with the proposed standard. Upon Board adoption, this section will be removed. Term(s): None. July November 2016 Page 2 of 19

When this standard receives Board adoption, the rationale boxes will be moved to the Supplemental Material Section of the standard. A. Introduction 1. Title: Event Reporting 2. Number: EOP-004-4 3. Purpose: To improve the reliability of the Bulk Electric System by requiring the reporting of events by Responsible Entities. 4. Applicability: 4.1. Functional Entities: For the purpose of the Requirements and the EOP-004 Attachment 1 contained herein, the following functional Functional entities Entities will be collectively referred to as Responsible Entity. 4.1.1. Reliability Coordinator 4.1.2. Balancing Authority 4.1.3. Transmission Owner 4.1.4. Transmission Operator 4.1.5. Generator Owner 4.1.6. Generator Operator 4.1.7. Distribution Provider 5. Effective Date: See the Implementation Plan for EOP-004-4. B. Requirements and Measures R1. Each Responsible Entity shall have an event reporting Operating Plan in accordance with EOP-004-4 Attachment 1 that includes the protocol(s) for reporting to the Electric Reliability Organization and other organizations (e.g., the Regional Entity, company personnel, the Responsible Entity s Reliability Coordinator, law enforcement, or governmental authority). [Violation Risk Factor: Lower] [Time Horizon: Operations Planning] M1. Each Responsible Entity will have a dated event reporting Operating Plan that includes, but is not limited to the protocol(s) and each organization identified to receive an event report for event types specified in EOP-004-4 Attachment 1 and in accordance with the entity responsible for reporting. July November 2016 Page 3 of 19

R2. Each Responsible Entity shall report events specified in EOP-004-4 Attachment 1 to the entities specified per their event reporting Operating Plan by the later of within 24 hours of recognition of meeting an event type threshold for reporting or by the end of the Responsible Entity s next business day if the event occurs on a weekend (which is recognized to be 4 PM local time on Friday to 8 AM local time on Monday) (4 p.m. local time will be considered the end of the business day). [Violation Risk Factor: Medium] [Time Horizon: Operations Assessment] M2. Each Responsible Entity will have as evidence of reporting an event either a copy of the completed EOP-004-4 Attachment 2 form or a DOE-OE-417 form; and some evidence of submittal (e.g., operator log or other operating documentation, voice recording, electronic mail message, or confirmation of facsimile) demonstrating that the event report was submitted by the later of within 24 hours of recognition of meeting an event type threshold for reporting or by the end of the Responsible Entity s next business day (4 p.m. local time will be considered the end of the business day) of meeting the threshold for reporting or by the end of the next business day if the event occurs on a weekend (which is recognized to be 4 PM local time on Friday to 8 AM local time on Monday). C. Compliance 1. Compliance Monitoring Process 1.1. Compliance Enforcement Authority: Compliance Enforcement Authority means NERC or the Regional Entity, or any entity as otherwise designated by an Applicable Governmental Authority, in their respective roles of monitoring and/or enforcing compliance with mandatory and enforceable Reliability Standards in their respective jurisdictions. 1.2. Evidence Retention: The Responsible Entity shall keep data or evidence to show compliance as identified below unless directed by its Compliance Enforcement Authority to retain specific evidence for a longer period of time as part of an investigation: The following evidence retention periods identify the period of time an entity is required to retain specific evidence to demonstrate compliance. For instances where the evidence retention period specified below is shorter than the time since the last audit, the Compliance Enforcement Authority may ask an entity to provide other evidence to show that it was compliant for the full time period since the last audit. Each Responsible Entity shall retain the current Operating Plan plus each version issued since the last audit for Requirement R1, and Measure M1. July November 2016 Page 4 of 19

Each Responsible Entity shall retain evidence of compliance since the last audit for Requirement R2 and Measure M2. If a Responsible Entity is found non-compliant, it shall keep information related to the non-compliance until mitigation is complete and approved or for the duration specified above, whichever is longer. The Compliance Enforcement Authority shall keep the last audit records and all requested and submitted subsequent audit records. 1.3. Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program As defined in the NERC Rules of Procedure, Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program refers to the identification of the processes that will be used to evaluate data or information for the purpose of assessing performance or outcomes with the associated Reliability Standard. Compliance Audit Self-Certification Spot Checking Compliance Investigation Self-Reporting Complaint July November 2016 Page 5 of 19

Violation Severity Levels R # Violation Severity Levels Lower VSL Moderate VSL High VSL Severe VSL R1. The Responsible Entity had an event reporting Operating Plan, but failed to include one applicable event type. R2. The Responsible Entity submitted an event report (e.g., written or verbal) to all required recipients more than 24 hours but less than or equal to 36 hours after recognition of meeting an event threshold for reporting. The Responsible Entity failed to submit an event report (e.g., written or verbal) to one entity identified in its event reporting Operating The Responsible Entity had an event reporting Operating Plan, but failed to include two applicable event types. The Responsible Entity submitted an event report (e.g., written or verbal) to all required recipients more than 36 hours but less than or equal to 48 hours after recognition of meeting an event threshold for reporting. The Responsible Entity failed to submit an event report (e.g., written or verbal) to two entities identified in its event reporting Operating The Responsible Entity had an event reporting Operating Plan, but failed to include three applicable event types. The Responsible Entity submitted an event report (e.g., written or verbal) to all required recipients more than 48 hours but less than or equal to 60 hours after recognition of meeting an event threshold for reporting. The Responsible Entity failed to submit an event report (e.g., written or verbal) to three entities identified in its event reporting Operating The Responsible Entity had an event reporting Operating Plan, but failed to include four or more applicable event types. The Responsible Entity failed to have an event reporting Operating Plan. The Responsible Entity submitted an event report (e.g., written or verbal) to all required recipients more than 60 hours after recognition of meeting an event threshold for reporting. The Responsible Entity failed to submit an event report (e.g., written or verbal) to four or more entities identified in its event reporting Operating Plan July November 2016 Page 6 of 19

R # Violation Severity Levels Lower VSL Moderate VSL High VSL Severe VSL Plan within 24 hours or by the end of the next business day, as applicable. Plan within 24 hours or by the end of the next business day, as applicable. Plan within 24 hours or by the end of the next business day, as applicable. within 24 hours or by the end of the next business day, as applicable. The Responsible Entity failed to submit a report for an event in EOP-004 Attachment 1. D. Regional Variances None. E. Associated Documents Link to the Implementation Plan and other important associated documents. July November 2016 Page 7 of 19

EOP-004 - Attachment 1: Reportable Events NOTE: Under certain adverse conditions (e.g. severe weather, multiple events) it may not be possible to report the damage caused by an event and issue a written Event Report within the timing in the standard. In such cases, the affected Responsible Entity shall notify parties per Requirement R2 and provide as much information as is available at the time of the notification. Submit reports to the ERO via one of the following: e-mail: systemawareness@nerc.net, Facsimile 404-446-9770 or Voice: 404-446-9780, select Option 1. Submit EOP-004 Attachment 2 (or DOE-OE-417) pursuant to Requirements R1 and R2. Rationale for Attachment 1: System-wide voltage reduction to maintain the continuity of the BES: The TOP is operating the system and is the only entity that would implement system-wide voltage reduction. Complete loss of Interpersonal Communication and Alternative Interpersonal Communication capability at a BES control center: To align EOP-004-4 with COM-001-2.1. COM-001-2.1 defined Interpersonal Communication for the NERC Glossary of Terms as: Any medium that allows two or more individuals to interact, consult, or exchange information. The NERC Glossary of Terms defines Alternative Interpersonal Communication as: Any Interpersonal Communication that is able to serve as a substitute for, and does not utilize the same infrastructure (medium) as, Interpersonal Communication used for day-to-day operation. Complete loss of monitoring or control capability at a BES control center: Language revisions to: Complete loss of monitoring or control capability at a BES control center for 30 continuous minutes or more provides clarity to the Threshold for Reporting and better aligns with the ERO Event Analysis Process. Event Type Damage or destruction of a Facility RC, BA, TOP Entity with Reporting Responsibility Threshold for Reporting Damage or destruction of a Facility within its Reliability Coordinator Area, Balancing Authority Area or Transmission Operator Area that results in action(s) to avoid a BES Emergency. July November 2016 Page 8 of 19

Event Type Damage or destruction of its Facility Physical threats to its Facility Entity with Reporting Responsibility TO, TOP, GO, GOP, DP TO, TOP, GO, GOP, DP Threshold for Reporting Damage or destruction of its Facility that results from actual or suspected intentional human action. It is not necessary to report theft unless it degrades normal operation of its Facility. Physical threat to its Facility excluding weather or natural disaster related threats, which has the potential to degrade the normal operation of the Facility. Suspicious device or activity at its Facility. Physical threats to its BES control center Public appeal for load reduction resulting from a BES Emergency System-wide voltage reduction to maintain the continuity of the BES Firm load shedding resulting from a BES Emergency RC, BA, TOP BA TOP Initiating RC, BA, TOP Physical threat to its BES control center, excluding weather or natural disaster related threats, which has the potential to degrade the normal operation of the control center. Suspicious device or activity at its BES control center. Public appeal for load reduction to maintain continuity of the BES. System- wide voltage reduction of 3% or more to maintain the continuity of the BES. Firm load shedding 100 MW (manual or automatic). July November 2016 Page 9 of 19

Event Type Entity with Reporting Responsibility Threshold for Reporting BES Emergency resulting in voltage deviation on a Facility Uncontrolled loss of firm load resulting from a BES Emergency System separation (islanding) TOP BA, TOP, DP RC, BA, TOP A voltage deviation of =/> ± 10% of nominal voltage sustained for 15 continuous minutes. Uncontrolled loss of firm load for 15 Minutes from a single incident: 300 MW for entities with previous year s peak demand 3,000 MW 200 MW for all other entities Each separation resulting in an island 100 MW Generation loss BA Total generation loss, within one minute, of: 2,000 MW in the Eastern, Western, or Quebec Interconnection 1,0001,400 MW in the ERCOT Interconnection Generation loss will be used to report Forced Outages not weather patterns or fuel supply unavailability for dispersed power producing resources. July November 2016 Page 10 of 19

Event Type Complete loss of off-site power to a nuclear generating plant (grid supply) Transmission loss Unplanned evacuation of its BES control center evacuation Complete loss of Interpersonal Communication and Alternative Interpersonal Communication capability at a its staffed BES control center Complete loss of monitoring or control capability at a its staffed BES control center TO, TOP TOP RC, BA, TOP RC, BA, TOP RC, BA, TOP Entity with Reporting Responsibility Threshold for Reporting Complete loss of off-site power (LOOP) affecting a nuclear generating station per the Nuclear Plant Interface Requirement Unexpected loss within its area, contrary to design, of three or more BES Elements Facilities caused by a common disturbance (excluding successful automatic reclosing). Unplanned evacuation from its BES control center facility for 30 continuous minutes or more. Complete loss of Interpersonal Communication and Alternative Interpersonal Communication capability affecting a its staffed BES control center for 30 continuous minutes or more. Complete loss of monitoring or control capability at a its staffed BES control center for 30 continuous minutes or more. July November 2016 Page 11 of 19

EOP-004 - Attachment 2: Event Reporting Form EOP-004 Attachment 2: Event Reporting Form Use this form to report events. The Electric Reliability Organization will accept the DOE OE- 417 form in lieu of this form if the entity is required to submit an OE-417 report. Submit reports to the ERO via one of the following: e-mail: systemawareness@nerc.net, Facsimile 404-446-9770 or voice: 404-446-9780, Option 1. Also submit to other applicable organizations per Requirement R1 (e.g., the Regional Entity, company personnel, the Responsible Entity s Reliability Coordinator, law enforcement, or Applicable Governmental Authority). 1. 2. Task Entity filing the report include: Company name: Name of contact person: Email address of contact person: Telephone Number: Submitted by (name): Date and Time of recognized event. Date: (mm/dd/yyyy) Time: (hh:mm) Time/Zone: Comments 3. Did the event originate in your system? Yes No Unknown Event Identification and Description: July November 2016 Page 12 of 19

EOP-004 Attachment 2: Event Reporting Form Use this form to report events. The Electric Reliability Organization will accept the DOE OE- 417 form in lieu of this form if the entity is required to submit an OE-417 report. Submit reports to the ERO via one of the following: e-mail: systemawareness@nerc.net, Facsimile 404-446-9770 or voice: 404-446-9780, Option 1. Also submit to other applicable organizations per Requirement R1 (e.g., the Regional Entity, company personnel, the Responsible Entity s Reliability Coordinator, law enforcement, or Applicable Governmental Authority). 4. Task (Check applicable box) Damage or destruction of a Facility Physical Threat to its Facility Physical Threat to its BES control center Unplanned BES control center evacuation Public appeal for load reduction System-wide voltage reduction BES Emergency: firm load shedding public appeal for load reduction voltage deviation on a Facility uncontrolled loss of firm load System separation (islanding) Generation loss Complete loss of off-site power to a nuclear generating plant (grid supply) Comments Written description (optional): July November 2016 Page 13 of 19

EOP-004 Attachment 2: Event Reporting Form Use this form to report events. The Electric Reliability Organization will accept the DOE OE- 417 form in lieu of this form if the entity is required to submit an OE-417 report. Submit reports to the ERO via one of the following: e-mail: systemawareness@nerc.net, Facsimile 404-446-9770 or voice: 404-446-9780, Option 1. Also submit to other applicable organizations per Requirement R1 (e.g., the Regional Entity, company personnel, the Responsible Entity s Reliability Coordinator, law enforcement, or Applicable Governmental Authority). Task Transmission loss Unplanned evacuation of its BES control center evacuation Complete loss of Interpersonal Communication and Alternative Interpersonal Communication capability at a its staffed BES control center Complete loss of monitoring or control capability at a its staffed BES control center Comments July November 2016 Page 14 of 19

Version History Version Date Action Change Tracking 2 Merged CIP-001-2a Sabotage Reporting and EOP- 004-1 Disturbance Reporting into EOP-004-2 Event Reporting; Retire CIP-001-2a Sabotage Reporting and Retired EOP-004-1 Disturbance Reporting. 2 November 7, 2012 2 June 20, 2013 FERC approved 3 November 13, 2014 3 November 19, 2015 Adopted by the NERC Board of Trustees Adopted by the NERC Board of Trustees FERC Order issued approving EOP-004-3. Docket No. RM15-13-000. Revision to entire standard (Project 2009-01) Replaced references to Special protection System and SPS with Remedial Action Scheme and RAS July November 2016 Page 15 of 19

Supplemental Material Guideline and Technical Basis Multiple Reports for a Single Organization For entities that have multiple registrations, the requirement is that these entities will only have to submit one report for any individual event. For example, if an entity is registered as a Reliability Coordinator, Balancing Authority and Transmission Operator, the entity would only submit one report for a particular event rather submitting three reports as each individual registered entity. Law Enforcement Reporting The reliability objective of EOP-004-4 is to improve the reliability of the Bulk Electric System by requiring the reporting of events by Responsible Entities. Certain outages, such as those due to vandalism and terrorism, may not be reasonably preventable. These are the types of events that should be reported to law enforcement. Entities rely upon law enforcement agencies to respond to and investigate those events which have the potential to impact a wider area of the BES. The inclusion of reporting to law enforcement enables and supports reliability principles such as protection of Bulk Electric System from malicious physical attack. The importance of BES awareness of the threat around them is essential to the effective operation and planning to mitigate the potential risk to the BES. Stakeholders in the Reporting Process Industry NERC (ERO), Regional Entity FERC DOE NRC DHS Federal Homeland Security- State State Regulators Local Law Enforcement State or Provincial Law Enforcement FBI Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) The above stakeholders have an interest in the timely notification, communication and response to an incident at a Facility. The stakeholders have various levels of accountability and have a vested interest in the protection and response to ensure the reliability of the BES. Draft 1 of EOP-004-4 June November 2016 Page 16 of 19

Supplemental Material Example of Reporting Process including Law Enforcement Entity Experiencing An Event in Attachment 1 Report to Law Enforcement? Refer to Ops Plan for Reporting NO YES Report Event to ERO, Reliability Coordinator Refer to Ops Plan for communicating Communicate to to law enforcement Law Enforcement ERO conducts investigation ERO Events Analysis Notification Protocol to State Agency Law Enforcement State Agency Law Enforcement coordinates as appropriate with FBI * ERO Reports Applicable Events to FERC Per Rules of Procedure NO Criminal act invoking federal jurisdiction? YES State Agency Law Enforcement Investigates State Agency Law Enforcement notifies FBI FBI Responds and makes notification to DHS * Canadian entities will follow law enforcement protocols applicable in their jurisdictions Draft 1 of EOP-004-4 June November 2016 Page 17 of 19

Supplemental Material Potential Uses of Reportable Information General situational awareness, correlation of data, trend identification, and identification of potential events of interest for further analysis in the ERO Event Analysis Process are a few potential uses for the information reported under this standard. The standard requires Functional entities Entities to report the incidents and provide known information as known at the time of the report. Further data gathering necessary for analysis is provided for under the ERO Event Analysis Program and the NERC Rules of Procedure. The NERC Rules of Procedure (section 800) provide an overview of the responsibilities of the ERO in regards to analysis and dissemination of information for reliability. Jurisdictional agencies (which may include DHS, FBI, NERC, RE, FERC, Provincial Regulators, and DOE) have other duties and responsibilities. Draft 1 of EOP-004-4 June November 2016 Page 18 of 19

Supplemental Material Rationale During development of this standard, text boxes were embedded within the standard to explain the rationale for various parts of the standard. Upon BOT adoption, the text from the rationale text boxes was moved to this section. Draft 1 of EOP-004-4 June November 2016 Page 19 of 19