IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT. IN AND FOR DUVAL f} C A. Plaintiff, Case No. COMPLAINT

Similar documents
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, v. Case No. COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA

Filing # E-Filed 12/15/ :11:41 PM

Filing # E-Filed 05/23/ :26:50 PM

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

CASE NO.: COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. The Plaintiff, Frederick W. Kortum, Jr., sues the Defendant, Alex Sink, in

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

DISTRICT COURT, BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO th Street Boulder, Colorado THE STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. John W. Suthers, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/27/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT COMPLAINT. 17 RCW , RCW , and RCW The Attorney General brings this

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

Case 3:12-cv HZ Document 23-1 Filed 11/25/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID#: 87

Case 9:18-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/2018 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE#

Case 2:17-cv JMV-SCM Document 1 Filed 08/01/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

Texas Finance Code, Chapter 393

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2016 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

4:10-cv TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 1 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. v. ) Civil Action No.

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Filing # E-Filed 04/07/ :06:24 PM

Defendant. Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

The plaintiff complaining of defendants, alleges and says: INTRODUCTION

IC Chapter 8. Professional Fundraiser Consultant and Solicitor Registration

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

TITLE 28 LENDING AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT

CALIFORNIA CODES CIVIL CODE SECTION This title may be cited as the "Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971."

Case 3:17-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. ) Civil Action No. ) CV-03-J-0615-S. Defendants. )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Texas State Statutes Regulating Debt Collection / Debt Collectors FINANCE CODE: CHAPTER 392. DEBT COLLECTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 10-""Jt{t--6"J 9 0 2CA

FILLING OUT THE ANSWER

8:18-cv DCC Date Filed 01/03/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CASE NO.: JUDGE

INTRODUCTION. TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ("UBER" or "Defendant") pursuant to North Carolina's Unfair and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

13 JArl Jr. ~N 1/= 25

Complaint for Permanent Injunctive Relief and other Statutory Relief with Request for Production Attached

Texas Automobile Dealers Association

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/10/16 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 5:12-cv BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/15/12 1 of 10. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO COMPLAINT

3/11/2013. Federal Trade Commission Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act

Case 2:06-cv JWL-DJW Document 1 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

DEFENDANT, TYLER KUKAHIKO'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND COUNTER-CLAIMS

SENATE, No. 685 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

Case 2:17-cv DN Document 2 Filed 05/30/17 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH : : : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 08/30/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

ETHICS RULES FOR CALIFORNIA TAX PREPARERS CALIFORNIA TAX PREPARER LAW

Case 1:17-cv MJW Document 5 Filed 03/03/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/14 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into by and between the Florida

Navigators Insurance Company Real Estate Professionals Errors and Omissions Insurance Application

FINAL JUDGMENT FOR COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFFS

IC Chapter 2. Farm Mutual Insurance Companies

Case 1:19-cv DLI-SJB Document 1 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1

Case: 4:16-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 02/09/16 Page: 1 of 30 PageID #: 1

MODEL CONSUMER DEBT MANAGEMENT SERVICES ACT February 2004

Case 2:16-cv JEO Document 1 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:16-cv MCR-CJK Document 18 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2015 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Employment Practices Liability Insurance New Business Application

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff(s) Case No: 09-cv-3332 MJD/JJK

Case 3:15-cv N Document 1 Filed 12/24/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/20/2018 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FL

Fair Debt Collection: What Every Bankruptcy Attorney Should Know

Case 1:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case No.: CLASS ACTION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT, 15 U.S.C. 1692, ET SEQ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICTOF FLORIDA. Plaintiff. Defendants. CLASS ACTIONCOMPLAINT

IC 27-4 ARTICLE 4. UNFAIR COMPETITION; UNAUTHORIZED INSURERS; FOREIGN INSURERS

Case 1:16-cv JFM Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

As Introduced. Regular Session S. B. No

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 25, 2018

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION I I I I I I I I I I I

I c~~ U.S. DISTRICT COURT

Ricardo Alexses N avapulido D/B/ A Corporate Insurance Services Dm/ A.J:\IM Insurance..\gency

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION. 1. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, by and through its Attorney General,

Case 2:14-cv JFW-MRW Document 24 Filed 03/12/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:91

MANAGING YOUR DEBT. An Informational and Educational Guide for Residents of New York State

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Civil Action No. 09-CV-367

Concurring Opinion by Ginoza, C.J.

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT YOU MAY BE REQUIRED TO FILE A CLAIM FORM. NOT ALL CLASS MEMBERS ARE REQUIRED TO FILE A CLAIM FORM.

Courthouse News Service

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1001

Case 1:16-cv SPB Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Senate Bill No. 818 CHAPTER 404

UPDATE ON INSURANCE CODE ON DECEPTIVE, UNFAIR, AND PROHIBITED PRACTICES

Ecug!2<27.ex.13599!!!Fqewogpv!2!!!Hkngf! !!!Rcig!2!qh!26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Defendant.

Courthouse News Service

STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF BERNALILLO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT. Plaintiff, Case No. CV

Transcription:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT. IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTYt(t"~j)ji@(j' f} C A STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. Plaintiff, Case No. NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA D/B/A NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES and AMERICAN FORECLOSURE COUNSELING CENTER, DIVISION cv~b Defendants. I COMPLAINT Plaintiff, STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, ("the Attorney General") sues Defendants NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA, and alleges: 1. This is an action for injunctive relief, damages on behalf of consumers, civil penalties, attorney's fees and costs and other relief pursuant to the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Chapter 501, Part II, Florida Statutes (2008); Florida's foreclosure-rescue statute, Section 501.1377, Florida Statutes (2008); and Florida's misleading-advertising statutes, Sections 817.06(1) and 817.41(1), Florida Statutes (2008). PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 2. The Attorney General is an enforcing authority of the Florida Deceptive and

Unfair Trade Practices Act. 3. NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP. is a Delaware corporation doing business at 4043 Bayrneadows Road, Jacksonville FL 32217 and 7954 Bayrneadows Road, Jacksonville FL 32217. 4. RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA are directors ofnational FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP. 5. The injurious business activities ofnational FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA affect consumers in more than one Florida judicial circuit as well as throughout the United States. 6. At all pertinent times, NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA engaged in trade or commerce as defined by Section 501.203(8). 7. The Attorney General has determined that this enforcement action serves the public interest as required by Section 501.207(2). 8. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to Section 501.207(3 ). 9. Venue in Duval County, Florida, is proper. THE DEFENDANTS' BUSINESS PRACTICES Foreclosure-Rescue Services I 0. NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA market foreclosure-rescue services to homeowners under the fictitious names "National Foreclosure Counseling Services" and "American Foreclosure Counseling Center." 2

11. Homeowners become aware of the purported services of NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA by means of promotional letters sent by the Defendants and/or websites maintained by the Defendants, including www.nfcscom.com and www.afcccom.com. 12. The Defendants' promotional materials and websites prompt homeowners to call NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA to inquire about their services. 13. Before accepting a homeowner as a client, NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA require the homeowner to pay them up-front fees. 14. A "working agreement" that NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA have required homeowners to sign since October 1, 2008, sets forth an up-front "retainer fee" to be paid by the homeowner, along with an up-front "processing fee" of$200 and a third, hourly fee of$125 for future services. 15. Another version of the "working agreement" that NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA have required homeowners to sign since October 1, 2008, sets forth a "retainer fee" to be paid by the homeowner, along with a "processing fee" and states explicitly that the funds are to be placed by the homeowner in an American Foreclosure Counseling Center account. 16. The up-front "retainer fee" charged by NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA is 3

equivalent to the monthly mortgage payment made by the homeowner to the homeowner's lender and consists of an amount averaging approximately $1,800. 17. NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA do not inform the homeowner that Florida law prohibits up-front fees for foreclosure-rescue services. 18. In at least one instance, a homeowner who had made a partial initial payment to the Defendants lost his home to foreclosure while the Defendants waited for him to complete the payment before engaging in any work on his behalf. 19. When homeowners telephone NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA to ask about their services will cost, the Defendants' representatives fail to clearly and conspicuously disclose the existence of an up-front fee, telling the callers that an amount equivalent to a monthly mortgage payment will be "held in escrow." 20. When homeowners telephone NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA to ask about their services, the Defendants' representatives tell them that the Defendants can stop foreclosure proceedings, reverse negative credit ratings and lower the homeowner's monthly mortgage payments by substantial amounts. 21. Some of the "working agreements" that homeowners must sign to obtain the Defendants' purported services state that National Foreclosure Counseling Services "guarantees the success of its efforts... to avoid the loss of possession of the mortgagee's home through a foreclosure..." 4

22. NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA have failed since October I, 2008, to execute written agreements with homeowners that specify the exact nature of the services to be performed and disclose to homeowners in language substantially similar to the language required by statute or in the location required by statute that the homeowners have the right to cancel their agreements with the Defendants. 23. NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA have since October 1, 2008, required homeowners to agree in writing not to negotiate with anyone, including their lenders, about their mortgages without notifying the Defendants. 24. NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA have refused to provide refunds to any client who is able to obtain improved mortgage terms on his or her own, without the involvement of the Defendants. 25. After accepting fees from homeowners, NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA have failed to provide the agreed-upon services. 26. NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA have since October I, 2008, required homeowners who want their services to sign statements asserting that they are not "IN ANYWAY CONFUSED ABOUT ANY PART OF THE WORKING AGREEMENT," that they are not victims of the Defendants under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, that they are "CONFIDENT THEY [ARE] NOT BEING VICTIMIZED... IN ANYWAY WHAT -S0-5

EVER" and that the Defendants are "NOT ATTEMPTING TO DUPE, MISLEAD, SWINDLE, OR CHEAT" them. 27. NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA employ a sales force of approximately 140 persons and bring in approximately $500,000 in fees each month. The Defendants' Advertising Practices 28. Mailings sent to homeowners by NATIONAL FORECLOSURE COUNSELING SERVICES CORP., RAYMOND PAULK and ROBERT V. DALLA VIA give the impression that they come from a government agency. 29. The Defendants' mailings refer to National Foreclosure Counseling Services and the American Foreclosure Counseling Center as "housing counseling community service[ s ]. " 30. The mailings state that the homeowner's property "has been selected for special programs by the Government Insured Institutions. 31. The mailings tell the recipients to contact an "Advisor for Duval County" or another Florida county, and that a "representative for Duval [or other] County is available" to talk to the homeowner. 32. The mailings state that they are an "urgent notification" and constitute a "last attempt to assist you." modification. 33. The mailings also state that the property in question "qualifies" for loan COUNT ONE VIOLATIONS OF CHAPTER 501, PART II, FLORIDA STATUTES DECEPTIVE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES 34. Plaintiffre-alleges Paragraphs I through 33. 6

35. The Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Chapter SOl, Part II, Florida Statutes (2008), states that "unfair methods of competition, unconscionable acts or practices, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce are hereby declared unlawful." 36. By engaging in the deceptive, unfair and unconscionable acts and practices described herein in connection with purported foreclosure-rescue services, the Defendants have violated and continue to violate the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. COUNT TWO VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 501.1377(3)(al and (b), FLORIDA STATUTES VIOLATIONS INVOLVING HOMEOWNERS DURING THE COURSE OF RESIDENTIAL FORECLOSURE PROCEEDINGS VIOLATIONS OF CHAPTER 501. PART II. FLORIDA STATUTES DECEPTIVE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES 37. Plaintiffre-alleges Paragraphs I through 33. 38. Section S01.1377(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2008), "Violations Involving Homeowners during the Course of Residential Foreclosure Proceedings," which went into effect on October I, 2008, states: In the course of offering or providing foreclosure-related rescue services, a foreclosure-rescue consultant may not: (a) Engage in or initiate foreclosure-related rescue services without first executing a written agreement with the homeowner for foreclosure-related rescue services... Section S01.1377(3)(a). 39. Section SOI.l377(3)(b), Florida Statutes (2008), "Violations Involving Homeowners during the Course of Residential Foreclosure Proceedings," states: In the course of offering or providing foreclosure-related rescue services, a foreclosure-rescue consultant may not: 7

(b) Solicit, charge, receive, or attempt to collect or secure payment, directly or indirectly, for foreclosure-related rescue services before completing or performing all services contained in the agreement for foreclosure-related rescue services. 40. Section 501.1377(7) states, "A person who violates any provision of this section commits an unfair and deceptive trade practice as defined in part II of this chapter [the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act]. Violators are subject to the penalties and remedies provided in part II of this chapter, including a monetary penalty not to exceed $15,000 per violation." 41. By failing to execute a written agreement with homeowners and charging homeowners seeking foreclosure-rescue services up-front fees as described herein, the Defendants have violated and continue to violate Section 501.1377(3)(b) and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. COUNT THREE VIOLATIONS OF SECTION S01.1377f4Ual and (c), FLORIDA STATUTES VIOLATIONS INVOLVING HOMEOWNERS DURING THE COURSE OF RESIDENTIAL FORECLOSURE PROCEEDINGS VIOLATIONS OF CHAPTER SOl. PART II. FLORIDA STATUTES DECEPTIVE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES 42. Plaintiff re-alleges Paragraphs 1 through 33. 43. Section 501.1377(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2008), "Violations Involving Homeowners during the Course of Residential Foreclosure Proceedings," states: The written agreement for foreclosure-related rescue services must be printed in at least 12-point uppercase type and signed by both parties. The agreement must include the name and address of the person providing foreclosurerelated rescue services, the exact nature and specific detail of each service to be provided, the total amount and terms of charges to be paid by the homeowner for the services, and the date of the agreement. 44. Section 501.1377(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2008), "Violations Involving Homeowners during the Course of Residential Foreclosure Proceedings," states: 8

An agreement for foreclosure-related rescue services must contain, immediately above the signature line, a statement in at least 12-point uppercase type that substantially complies with the following: HOMEOWNER'S RIGHT OF CANCELLATION YOU MAY CANCEL THIS AGREEMENT FOR FORECLOSURE RELATED RESCUE SERVICES WITHOUT ANY PENALTY OR OBLIGATION WITHIN 3 BUSINESS DAYS FOLLOWING THE DATE THIS AGREEMENT IS SIGNED BY YOU. THE FORECLOSURE-RESCUE CONSUL,TANT IS PROHIBITED BY LAW FROM ACCEPTING ANY MONEY, PROPERTY, OR OTHER FORM OF PAYMENT FROM YOU UNTIL ALL PROMISED SERVICES ARE COMPLETE. IF FOR ANY REASON YOU HAVE PAID THE CONSULTANT BEFORE CANCELLATION, YOUR PAYMENT MUST BE RETURNED TO YOU NO LATER THAN I 0 BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE CONSULTANT RECEIVES YOUR CANCELLATION NOTICE. TO CANCEL THIS AGREEMENT, A SIGNED AND DATED COPY OF A STATEMENT THAT YOU ARE CANCELING THE AGREEMENT SHOULD BE MAILED (POSTMARKED) OR DELIVERED TO <NAME) AT (ADDRESS) NO LATER THAN MIDNIGHT OF (DATE). IMPORTANT: IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOU CONTACT YOUR LENDER OR MORTGAGE SERVICER BEFORE SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT. YOUR LENDER OR MORTGAGE SERVICER MAY BE WILLING TO NEGOTIATE A PAYMENT PLAN OR A RESTRUCTURING WITH YOU FREE OF CHARGE. 45. Section 501.1377(7) states, "A person who violates any provision of this section commits an unfair and deceptive trade practice as defined in part II of this chapter [the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act]. Violators are subject to the penalties and remedies provided in part II of this chapter, including a monetary penalty not to exceed $15,000 per violation." 46. By failing to execute a written agreement specifying the exact services to be performed and failing to inform homeowners of their right to cancel as described herein, the 9

Defendants have violated and continue to violate Section 501.1377(4)(c) and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. COUNT FOUR VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 817.06(1), FLORIDA STATUTES MISLEADING ADVERTISING VIOLATIONS OF CHAPTER 501, PART II. FLORIDA STATUTES DECEPTIVE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES 47. P[aintiffre-alleges Paragraphs 1 through 33. 48. Section 817.06(1}, Florida Statutes (2008}, proscribes the dissemination of unfair, deceptive or misleading advertising, and states: No person... shall, with intent to offer or sell or in anywise dispose of merchandise,... service or anything offered by such person... directly or indirectly, to the public, for sale or distribution or issuance, or with intent to increase the consumption or use thereof, or with intent to induce the public in any manner to enter into any obligation relating thereto,... knowingly or intentionally make, publish, disseminate, circulate or place before public, or cause, directly or indirectly, to be made, published, disseminated or circulated or placed before the public in this state in a newspaper or other publication or in the form of a book, notice handbill, poster, bill, circular, pamphlet or letter or in any other way, an advertisement of any sort regarding such... service or anything so offered to the public, which advertisement contains any assertion, representation or statement which is untrue, deceptive, or misleading. 49. Section 501.203(3)(c) states that a violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practice Act may be based upon '[a]ny law, statute, rule, regulation, or ordinance which proscribes unfair methods of competition, or unfair, deceptive, or unconscionable acts or practices." 50. By sending homeowners deceptive mailings as described herein, the Defendants have violated and continue to violate Section 817.06(1) and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. 10

COUNT FIVE VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 817.41(1), FLORIDA STATUTES. MISLEADING ADVERTISING VIOLATIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES. CHAPTER 501. PART II, DECEPTIVE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES 51. Plaintiffre-alleges Paragraphs 1 through 33. 52. Section 817.41 ( 1) proscribes misleading advertising, and states: (1) It shall be unlawful for any person to make or disseminate or cause to be made or disseminated before the general public of the state, or any portion thereof, any misleading advertisement. Such making or dissemination of misleading advertising shall constitute and is hereby declared to be fraudulent and unlawful, designed and intended for obtaining money or property under false pretenses. 53. Section 501.203(3)(c) states that a violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act may be based upon "[a]ny law, statute, rule, regulation, or ordinance which proscribes unfair methods of competition, or unfair, deceptive, or unconscionable acts or practices." 54. By sending homeowners deceptive mailings as described herein, the Defendants have violated and continue to violate Section 817.41(1) and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, asks for judgrnent: A. Permanently enjoining the Defendants from violating the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act; B. Permanently enjoining the Defendants from violating Section 501.1377(3-4), "Violations Involving Homeowners during the Course of Residential Foreclosure Proceedings"; C. Permanently enjoining the Defendants from violating Section 817.06(1); 11

D. Permanently enjoining the Defendants from violating Section 817.41(1); E. Awarding the Plaintiff actual damages and interest on behalf of consumers injured by the acts and practices of the Defendants pursuant to Section 501.207(1)(c) and as may be allowed by other applicable statutes; F. Requiring disgorgement of all of the Defendants' profits generated by their unlawful acts and practices; G. Assessing the Defendants civil penalties in the amount of $10,000 for each violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, pursuant to Section 501.2075; H. Awarding the Plaintiff attorney's fees and costs pursuant to Sections 501.2105 and 501.2075 and as may be allowed by other applicable statutes; and I. Granting such other relief as the court deems proper and just. Respectfully submitted, BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL r' ~-r~;&ttu 7ltus NF ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL Florida Bar No. 0493805 Office of the Attorney General Economic Crimes Division The Capitol, PL-0 I Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050 Telephone 850-414-3600 Fax 850-488-4483 12