Re: Request to Division of Market Oversight Staff for Interpretive Guidance or Extension of No-Action Relief re: CDS Clearing-Related Swaps

Similar documents
Re: Request for Division of Market Oversight to No-action Relief for SDR Reporting Requirements for Swaps Cleared by Exempt and No-Action DCOs

17 CFR Part 45. Dear Mr. McGonagle:

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

April 24, Re: Interim Final Rule on Swap Data Repositories - Access to SDR Data by Market Participants (RIN 3038-AE14)

Request for Relief Relating to Aggregation Provision in Final Block Trade Rule

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Safe, Efficient Markets. Re: De Minimis Exception to the Swap Dealer Definition; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

August 13, De Minimis Exception to the Swap Dealer Definition (RIN 3038 AE68)

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

under Parts 37 and 45 Related to Confirmations and Recordkeeping for Swaps Not Required or Intended to be Cleared (April 15, 2015).

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

June 8, v1

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. 50 Collyer Quay #09-01 OUE Bayfront, Singapore P

Time-Limited No-Action Relief for Agents from the Post-Allocation Swap Timing Requirement of 45.3(e)(ii)(A) of the Commission s Regulations

Request for Interpretative Guidance and Relief on Application of Rule 1.35(a) to Asset Managers

January 8, Via Electronic Submission:

Re: Initial Response to District Court Remand Order in SIFMA et al. v. CFTC (RIN 3088-AE27)

February 22, RIN 3038 AD20 -- Swap Data Repositories. Dear Mr. Stawick:

Comment on TW SEF LLC Self-Certification for Swaps Made Available to Trade

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

ICE Swap Trade, LLC s Self-Certification of Package Trade Rule

January 7, Re: Comments in Response to CME Submission #

The Financial Markets Lawyers Group 33 Liberty St., 7th Floor New York, NY 10045

Review of Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements (RIN 3038-AE12)

Re: CFTC and SEC Staff Public Roundtable on International Issues relating to Dodd-Frank Title VII

October 30, Also known as MarkitSERV, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Markit. See

Request for Relief from the Trade Execution Requirement for Swaps Executed as Part of Package Transactions in the Interest Rate Asset Class

Re: Comments Regarding Review of Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements (RIN 3038 AE12)

SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

No-Action Relief with Regard to Sections 5b(a) and 2(h)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Implementing Regulations Thereunder

August 21, Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Commodity Options and Agricultural Swaps, RIN 3038 AD21

Clarification Temporary Equivalence and Recognition in relation to UK CCPs

Re: Public Meeting of the Technology Advisory Committee (TAC) on February 10

ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act

October 25, Dear Ms. Jurgens:

January 3, Re: Comments Regarding CFTC s Proposed Rule Pertaining to the Process for Review of Swaps for Mandatory Clearing

CFTC ISSUES MULTIPLE NO-ACTION LETTERS ON REPORTING AND BUSINESS CONDUCT RULES. Portfolio reconciliation; Swap trading relationship documentation;

Request for Relief Relating to Certain Foreign Exchange Transactions

Re: Comments in Response to Notice of Meeting of the Technology Advisory Committee

December 19, Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Re: Registration and Regulation of Security-Based Swap Execution Facilities File Number S

Comment Letter on the Proposed Clearing Requirement Determination Under Section 2(h) of the CEA for Interest Rate Swaps (RIN 3038 AE20)

Re: RIN 3038 AD51 - Notice of Proposed Rulemaking - Customer Clearing Documentation and Timing of Acceptance for Clearing (76 Fed. Reg.

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Via online submission to ESMA: The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) 20 May 2016

Comment Letter on the Proposed Clearing Determination Under Section 2(h) of the CEA (RIN 3038-AD86)

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS (additions are underscored and deletions are stricken through) FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS * * *

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre st Street, NW, Washington, DC Telephone: (202)

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Re: Confirmation, Portfolio Reconciliation, and Portfolio Compression Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants [RIN 3038-AC96]

ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.

PLI Advanced Swaps & Other Derivatives 2016 Clearing Panel. Customer Funds Segregation for Cleared Derivatives Under the CEA Framework

August 29, 2014 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

January 19, CBOE Futures Exchange, LLC Rule Certification Submission Number CFE

February 27, Mr. Sergey Shvetsov First Deputy Governor of the Bank of Russia 9 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow, GSP-1, Russia

June 26, Petition for Amendment of the Ownership and Control Reports Rule

Comments on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, De Minimis Exception to the Swap Dealer Definition (RIN 3038-AE68)

Re: Comment Letter on the Further Proposed Guidance Regarding Compliance with Certain Swap Regulations (RIN 3038-AD85)

Clearing Requirement Determination Under Section 2(h) of the CEA RIN Number 3038 AD86

Swap Transaction Reporting Requirements

/SDA. David Stawick Secretary Commodity Futures Trading Commission Three Lafayette Centre st Street, NW. Washington, DC 20581

September 14, Proposed Rulemaking (RIN 3038-AC82) to Create a Separate Account Class for Customer Positions in Cleared OTC Derivatives

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Clearing Exemption for Swaps between Certain Affiliated Entities (RIN 3038-AD47)

Re: Review of Swaps for Mandatory Clearing under Section 723 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Act )

Re: Further Definition of Swap, Security-Based Swap, and Security-Based Swap Agreement; Mixed Swaps; Security-Based Swap Agreement Recordkeeping,

Pursuant to its Order of Registration as a Derivatives Clearing Organization, Nadex (formerly HedgeStreet, Inc.)

Dodd-Frank Title VII: Three Years Out, Still Buyer Beware

Via Electronic Service at comments.cftc.gov May 27, 2014

Key Dodd-Frank Compliance Considerations for End-Users

ISDA Reporting Counterparty Rules

CFTC Federal Register Notice

Re: Swap Trading Relationship Documentation Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants / 17 CFR Part 23 / RIN 3038 AC96

February 15, Via Electronic Submission:

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( Act or Exchange

Chapter 9. 9:1 General Review of Systemic Risk and Regulatory Developments

DERIVATIVES & STRUCTURED PRODUCTS

Dodd-Frank Title VII Update: Where Are We Today and Where Are We Going? Ten Important Issues Facing Derivatives Users

September 29, Project KISS Recommendations. Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

17 April Capital Markets Unit Corporations and Capital Markets Division The Treasury Langton Crescent PARKES ACT 2600 Australia

Renminbi (CNY) for determination of whether mandatory clearing should apply.

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION. Written Acknowledgment of Customer Funds from Federal Reserve Banks

March 24, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

National Futures Association: Proposed Interpretive Notice "NFA Compliance Rule 2-9: CPO Internal Controls Systems "

National Futures Association: Proposed Interpretive Notice: Disclosure Requirements for NFA Members Engaging in Virtual Currency Activities

Dodd Frank and inter affiliate trading of derivatives

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( Act ), 1 and Rule

Re: Request for Interpretive Guidance CFTC Regulations 4.34 and 4.35 Performance Disclosure for Forex CTAs

Amendments to the Swap Data Access Provisions of Part 49 and Certain Other. SUMMARY: Pursuant to Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and

CSA Staff Notice and Proposed Model Provincial Rule Derivatives: Customer Clearing and Protection of Customer Collateral Positions

Walid Khuri, Robert M. McLauglin, David S. Mitchell and David W. Selden

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission. SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission or CFTC) is

Brexit Recognition of EEA derivatives trading venues under EMIR and MiFIR as they apply in the UK after Brexit

INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL BANKERS

Dodd Frank Update: Impact on Gas & Power Transactions

August 5, Via CFTC Portal Submissions

Questions to ACER on REMIT Implementation

Re: RIN 3038 AD18 / Core Principles and Other Requirements for Swap Execution Facilities

Transcription:

September 9, 2015 17 CFR Part 43 17 CFR Part 45 17 CFR Part 37 Mr. Vincent McGonagle Director, Division of Market Oversight Commodity Futures Trading Commission Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20581 Re: Request to Division of Market Oversight Staff for Interpretive Guidance or Extension of No-Action Relief re: CDS Clearing-Related Swaps Dear Mr. McGonagle: The International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. 1 ( ISDA ) and its members recognize the importance of the Part 43 and Part 45 regulations (the Reporting Rules ) and the Part 37 regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the Commission or CFTC ) and strongly support initiatives to increase regulatory transparency. ISDA, on behalf of its members that are reporting parties under Part 43 2 and reporting counterparties under Part 45 3 (collectively, Reporting Parties ), is writing to request an extension and expansion of certain no-action relief issued pursuant to CFTC Letter No. 14-119 ( NAL 14-119 ) with regards to the reporting of CDS Clearing-Related Swaps or interpretive guidance that would negate the need for such relief, as discussed below. I. Background On December 13, 2012, ISDA submitted a request 4 to staff of the CFTC s Division of Market Oversight ( DMO ) requesting no-action relief on behalf of its members, and other similarly situated market participants, to request that the Commission provide relief under Part 45 pertaining to certain off-facility, cleared credit default swaps ( CDS ) that are entered into pursuant 1 Since 1985, ISDA has worked to make the global over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets safer and more efficient. Today, ISDA has over 800 member institutions from 68 countries. These members include a broad range of OTC derivatives market participants including corporations, investment managers, government and supranational entities, insurance companies, energy and commodities firms, and international and regional banks. In addition to market participants, members also include key components of the derivatives market infrastructure, such as exchanges, intermediaries, clearinghouses and repositories, as well as law firms, accounting firms and other service providers. Information about ISDA and its activities is available on the Association's web site: www.isda.org. 2 17 CFR Part 43 Real-Time Public Reporting of Swap Transaction Data, 77 Fed. Reg. 1182 (Jan. 9, 2012). CFTC regulation 43.2 defines the term reporting party to mean the party to a swap with the duty to report a publicly reportable swap transaction in accordance with this [Part 43] and section 2(a)(13)(F) of the [CEA]. 3 17 CFR Part 45 Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements, 77 Fed. Reg. 2136 (Jan 13, 2012). CFTC regulation 45.1 defines the term reporting counterparty to mean the counterparty required to report swap data pursuant to this [Part 45], selected as provided in 45.8. 4 http://www2.isda.org/attachment/njkyoa==/2012%20dec%2013%20nal_clearing_created%20swaps_final.p df 1

to a derivatives clearing organization s ( DCO ) rules related to its price submission process ( CDS Settlement Price Process ) for determining end-of-day settlement prices for cleared CDS ( CDS Clearing-Related Swaps ). In response to ISDA s request, DMO issued CFTC Letter No. 12-59 which granted conditional relief to Reporting Parties that are DCO clearing members from their obligations under Part 45 with respect to CDS Clearing-Related Swaps until June 30, 2013, allowing their obligations to be fulfilled by the DCO instead. Subsequently, DMO extended such relief until December 31, 2013 under CFTC Letter No. 13-36. Under CFTC Letter No. 13-86, DMO further extended such relief until September 30, 2014 and, in consideration of a related request from the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc., expanded such relief to exempt Reporting Parties from the requirement to execute CDS Clearing-Related Swaps on a Swap Execution Facility ( SEF ) or Designated Contract Market ( DCM ) and exempted DCOs from the SEF registration requirement, both pursuant to its Part 37 regulations. NAL 14-119 extended such relief until the earlier of (i) September 30, 2015 or (ii) the effective date of any DMO or Commission action to facilitate a longer term approach to establishing settlement prices for CDSs. On August 31, 2015, the Commission s proposed Amendments to Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for Cleared Swaps 5 (the Proposed Amendments ) were published in the Federal Register in response to the its Review of Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements 6. In a clarification to the view previously indicated by DMO staff, the Proposed Amendments acknowledge that certain clearing swaps, including those executed anonymously, are not preceded by an uncleared bilateral swap (a/k/a an alpha ), defined therein as an original swap. However, the Proposed Amendments do not explicitly advise whether CDS Clearing- Related Swaps are recognized by the Commission as clearing swaps which do not have original swaps; nor does it refer to a permanent resolution of the NAL 14-119 relief pertaining to Part 45. II. Request for Interpretive Guidance ISDA contends that there is no original swap associated with CDS Clearing-Related Swaps, but rather the relevant parties enter directly into clearing swaps with the DCO. Therefore, as inferred from the Proposed Amendments, neither Reporting Parties nor DCOs should have any obligations under the Commissions Reporting Rules and the Proposed Amendments with respect to original swaps in relation to their CDS Clearing-Related Swaps. ISDA intends to comment separately on the Proposed Amendments, but in the meantime would appreciate verification by DMO of this interpretation, which would negate the need for an extension or expansion of the relief under NAL 14-119 provided to Reporting Parties pursuant to Parts 37, 43 and 45, as further discussed below. 5 80 Fed. Reg. 52544 6 79 Fed. Reg. 16689 2

III. Relief Expansion In our letter to DMO submitted on September 25, 2014 7 requesting an extension of CFTC Letter No. 13-86, ISDA asked that DMO expand the scope of its letter to provide relief for Reporting Parties from the requirement to report CDS Clearing-Created Swaps under Part 43. Due to the anonymized nature of the CDS Settlement Price Process that results in CDS Clearing-Created Swaps, Reporting Parties do not have the relevant swap data to enable them to report these alphas and as a matter of practice the DCOs have been fulfilling this obligation pursuant to the conditions in NAL 14-119. Reporting Parties cannot consider the DCO as a third-party service provider in this scenario as they do not have the visibility to monitor whether the DCO has reported these swaps timely and accurately or the complete information on the swaps in order to report in the event of a gap or error. DMO staff has acknowledged that ISDA requested an expansion of the relief for CDS Clearing- Related Swaps to Part 43, but has not yet taken action to allow for a Reporting Party s obligation to be met by the DCO or otherwise shift the reporting obligation to the DCO. If DMO provides the interpretive guidance requested in II above, then a staff letter would not be necessary to ensure the compliance of Reporting Parties with respect to their obligations for CDS Clearing- Related Swaps under either Part 43 or Part 45. However, if DMO chooses not to issue such interpretive guidance, then ISDA respectfully requests that DMO provide additional relief that accepts that a DCO may also fulfill the Part 43 reporting obligation for CDS Clearing-Related Swaps until such time as the Commission affects a permanent resolution in conjunction with the Proposed Amendments or via separate Commission action. IV. Relief Extension ISDA respectfully requests that DMO issue the interpretive guidance requested above in order to eliminate the reporting and trade execution obligations for original swaps perceived to be related to CDS Clearing-Related Swaps. In absence of such action, ISDA requests that DMO further extend and expand the relief granted pursuant to NAL 14-119 and thereby recommend that enforcement action not be taken against a Reporting Party for (i) failure to report swap data pursuant to either Part 43 or Part 45 for CDS Clearing-Related Swaps or (ii) entering into a CDS Clearing-Related Swap through the CDS Settlement Price Process rather than on a SEF or DCM as may be required by Part 37. We request such relief until September 30, 2016, or until such time as the requirements pertaining to CDS Clearing-Related Swaps are effectively clarified or amended in a manner that eliminates the necessity for such relief. 7 http://www2.isda.org/attachment/njk5mg==/request%20to%20dmo%20for%20extension%20of%20no- Action%20Relief%20for%20CDS%20Clearing-Related%20Swaps_25Sep14_FINAL.pdf 3

Thank you for your consideration of these concerns. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Tara Kruse Director; Co-Head of Data, Reporting & FpML International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. cc: Dan Bucsa, Deputy Director, Division of Market Oversight 4

Certification Pursuant to Commission Regulation 140.99(c)(3) As required by Commission Regulation 140.99(c)(3), I hereby (i) certify that the material facts set forth in the attached letter dated September 9, 2015 are true and complete to the best of my knowledge; and (ii) undertake to advise the Commission, prior to the issuance of a response thereto, if any material representation contained therein ceases to be true and complete. Sincerely, Tara Kruse Director; Co-Head of Data, Reporting & FpML International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. 5