No. WP/ECO/DTL/09/01. A Note on Static Contribution of Services Sector to Growth in India. Avadhoot Nadkarni. September 2009

Similar documents
MONEY SUPPLY ROLE IN ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL GROWTH: THE CASE OF JORDAN ( )

Dependence of States on Central Transfers: State-wise Analysis

N. Surendran, Research Scholar B. Mathavan, Professor of Economics Annamalai University =============================================================

Impact of Fdi on Macroeconomic Parameters of Growth and Development : A Post Liberalisation Analysis

Characteristics of the euro area business cycle in the 1990s

The Indian Labour Market : An Overview

ANALYSIS OF BALANCE OF PAYMENTS OF INDIAN ECONOMY

FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT (FDI) AND ITS IMPACT ON INDIA S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT A. Muthusamy*

MERCHANDISE EXPORTS OF ASEAN, CHINA AND INDIA 1. Highlights

Volume Title: The Formation and Stocks of Total Capital. Volume URL:

EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN INDIA. D. K. Malhotra 1 Philadelphia University, USA

Chapter-3. Sectoral Composition of Economic Growth and its Major Trends in India

ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INFORMAL SECTOR

How Successful is China s Economic Rebalancing?*

How would an expansion of IDA reduce poverty and further other development goals?

Income Inequality and Progressive Income Taxation in China and India, Thomas Piketty and Nancy Qian

Potential Output in Denmark

Øystein Olsen: The economic outlook

Against the Consensus Reflections on the Great Recession. Justin Yifu Lin National School of Development Peking University

Growth and Productivity in Belgium

E- ISSN X ISSN INDIA S MANUFACTURING EXPORTS: ISSUES & CHALLENGES

DETERMINANTS OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN BRICS COUNTRIES

Financial system and agricultural growth in Ukraine

Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 1, Issue 4 (2016)

Aging in India: Its Socioeconomic. Implications

Public expenditure is the expenditure incurred by public authorities-central,

No. WP/ECO/DTL/08/01. Regional Trade Arrangements, Generalized System of Preferences and Dispute Settlement in the WTO.

AN OVERVIEW OF THE GROWTH AND PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES SECTOR IN INDIA: A POST LIBERALISATION ANALYSIS

Rotorua Lakes District Population Projections

CHAPTER 6 DIRECT AND INDIRECT TAXES

2 Macroeconomic Scenario

Structural Transformation in Out-put in J&K State Economy ( )

India s Economy: Performances and Challenges

Growth of Unorganized Manufacturing Sector in India Analysis of National Sample Survey Studies

Sectoral Lending by Ethiopian Commercial Banks: a Performance Analysis

Challenges For the Future of Chinese Economic Growth. Jane Haltmaier* Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. August 2011.

Creating Jobs in Manufacturing

Productivity Trends in Asia Since 1980

April An Analysis of Saskatchewan s Productivity, : Capital Intensity Growth Drives Strong Labour Productivity Performance CENTRE FOR

Mohd.Saif Alam Ph.D, Assistant Professor, Saraswati Institute of Technology & Management, Unnao (U.P) India.

Measuring China's Fiscal Policy Stance

IMPACT OF ECONOMIC REFORMS ON FDI IN INDIA

IMPACT OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX (GST)

II. FISCAL SITUATION

Mr. Bäckström explains why price stability ought to be a central bank s principle monetary policy objective

What Explains Growth and Inflation Dispersions in EMU?

373% 1 UK ASSET MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY: A GLOBAL CENTRE KEY FINDINGS

Foreign direct or indirect investments.

Risk Tolerance and Risk Exposure: Evidence from Panel Study. of Income Dynamics

Public Sector Statistics

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES

Investment 3.1 INTRODUCTION. Fixed investment

ECON 1010 Principles of Macroeconomics Exam #2. Section A: Multiple Choice Questions. (30 points; 2 pts each)

THE DETERMINANTS AND VALUE OF CASH HOLDINGS: EVIDENCE FROM LISTED FIRMS IN INDIA

PRIORITY SECTOR LENDING IN INDIAN BANKING SECTOR

Progress Evaluation of the Transformation of China's Economic Growth Pattern 1 (Preliminary Draft Please do not quote)

Tax Incentives and Growth of Paper Industry in India

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN

Deepak Mohanty: Inflation dynamics in India issues and concerns

Inflation in the Indian Economy

Macroeconomic Overview of India: Recent Trends and Developments

Growth of Factor Inputs and Total Factor Productivity in Indian Public Sector Enterprises*

Annual Business Survey of Economic Impact 2004

Development of Government Bond Market with Special Reference to Developing A Yield curve: Experience of Sri Lanka

3.1 Introduction. 3.2 Growth over the Very Long Run. 3.1 Introduction. Part 2: The Long Run. An Overview of Long-Run Economic Growth

Statement by Kasper Rorsted Chairman of the Management Board Conference-Call May 7, 2015, a.m.

Government expenditure and Economic Growth in MENA Region

Growth with Time Zone Differences

Structure and Dynamics of Labour Market in Bangladesh

Role of Corporate Securities in Household Saving and Private Corporate Sector Financing during Eighties - Some Empirical Observations.

Social Sector and Economic Reforms (With Special Reference to Public Health)

Research on Optimization Direction of Industrial Investment Structure in Inner Mongolia, the West of China

Trends of Public Expenditure on Infrastructure in Karnataka

2018 SYMBIOTICS MIV SURVEY A study of Global Microfinance Investment Funds

Monitoring the Performance of the South African Labour Market

Financial Convergence in Asia

Nepal Rastra Bank Research Department Baluwatar, Kathmandu

UNIT ROOT TEST OF SELECTED NON-AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES AND MACRO ECONOMIC FACTORS IN MULTI COMMODITY EXCHANGE OF INDIA LIMITED

Trends and Structure of Employment and Productivity in Unorganized Manufacturing Sector of India in Post-reform Period

to 4 per cent annual growth in the US.

Performance Evaluation of Selected Equity Mutual Fund Schemes

A STUDY ON CAPACITY UTILIZATION AND THE EFFICIENCY OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LIMITED NEW DELHI

Static Revenue fromads Lives & 10-year T- bond Rate Adjustment. Static Revenue from ADS Lives & 2.2% Inflation & 1.5% Real Return

A STUDY ON FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN INDIA

An overview of the South African macroeconomic. environment

Monitoring the Performance of the South African Labour Market

Assessment of reallocation warrants in Tanzania

Vishleshan-International Journal of Engineering and Management (VIJEM) Volume 1, Issue 3 (Apr.-June, 2016) ISSN (Online): X

Saudi Arabian economy Saudi crude production less synchronized with global growth

The Canada-U.S. Income Gap

Designing Scenarios for Macro Stress Testing (Financial System Report, April 2016)

Labour. Overview Latin America and the Caribbean. Executive Summary. ILO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean

ILO-IPEC Interactive Sampling Tools No. 7

ANNEX 3. The ins and outs of the Baltic unemployment rates

FDI Outflows Trends and Patterns of Indian Companies Anupam 1 Shilpa Rani 2 & Deepak Kumar 3

A COMAPARATIVE STUDY ON REPORTING OF MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS ACTIVITIES UNDER IGAAP AND IND AS

SOME IMPORTANT CHANGES IN THE STRUCTURE OF IRISH SOCIETY. A REVIEW OF PAST DEVELOPMENTS AND A PERSPECTIVE ON THE FUTURE. J.J.Sexton.

Case Solution. Operating Income ($ millions) Adjusted by Expensing of Software Development Costs 1

Changing for the Better

Received: 4 September Revised: 9 September Accepted: 19 September. Foreign Institutional Investment on Indian Capital Market: An Empirical Analysis

Transcription:

WORKING PAPER No. WP/ECO/DTL/09/01 A Note on Static Contribution of Services Sector to Growth in India Avadhoot Nadkarni September 2009 Planning Commission Chair and Unit in Planning and Development Department of Economics (Autonomous) University of Mumbai Mumbai 400 098

A Note on Static Contribution of Services Sector to Growth in India 1 Abstract Avadhoot Nadkarni 2 This note makes a distinction between the share of a sector in national product and its contribution to growth in the static sense. Though the share of services sector in national product was less than that of agriculture till the first-half of 1980s, the contribution of services sector to growth, as defined in the note, has always been more than that of the other two sectors in India. Moreover, whereas the contribution of services sector to growth has been increasing throughout, that of the agricultural and the industrial sector has been decreasing, the former much more than the latter. Thus, in a static sense, Indian growth has always been services-led and, by the 2000s, services contributed two-thirds to aggregate growth. Keywords: Services Sector; Sectoral Contribution; Indian Growth JEL Codes: O14, O47, O53 1. Introduction The acceleration of the rate of economic growth in India in the 2000s has generated interest in characterising the structure of this growth. In a comparative analysis of the growth phenomenon in India it is customary to characterise the growth in East and South-East Asia and in China as being promoted by the manufacturing sector, whereas the growth in India is said to be services-led. This note makes a distinction between the static and the dynamic contribution of a sector to growth and examines the servicesector-led characteristic of Indian growth in a static sense. In a static sense, the services sector in India seems, statistically, to be the leading sector based on its consistently high growth rate, relative to the agricultural and the industrial 1 Part of papers presented at the UGC National Seminar on Services-Led Growth at Birla College, Kalyan on March 28-29, 2009 and the UGC National Conference on Services Sector Revolution Issues and Challenges at Lady Doak College, Madurai on August 20, 2009. Thanks are due to Rajan Padwal for his comments on the note the usual disclaimer applies. 2 Professor of Planning & Development 2

sector and, consequently, its high share in the national output. The correct statistical way of identifying the leading sector is not by looking at the current share of the sector or its past relative growth that has produced the current share but by looking at the contribution of the sector to aggregate growth. The note works out the contribution of the services sector to growth based on the sectoral growth rate and the sectoral weight and thereby identifies the services-led growth phase in India. The exercise shows that except perhaps in the first few years of the very first decade of planning in India, the services sector has always made a dominant contribution to Indian growth. 3 In a more dynamic sense, on the other hand, the services sector can be called a leading sector only if, as it becomes more dominating, its own productivity continues to remain high and it generates positive externalities to other sectors of the economy. So long as there are structurally unemployed resources, a sector can continue to grow by using these, but in the secular run, a sector can substantially contribute to growth through productivity growth which not only increases the output from given resources in the sector, but also provides positive externalities to sectors to which it provides inputs. The issues of service sector productivity in India and the mechanism through which the dynamic growth impulses are transmitted from the services to other sectors of the economy constitute the subject matter of another paper. 2. A Measure of Contribution of a Sector to Growth The dominance of a sector is generally captured by the contribution of the sector to the national output. The fact that the services sector has more than 50 per cent weight in national product does not however qualify the growth to be identified as services-led, not even in the static sense that is emphasized here. Aggregate growth rate can be expressed as the weighted average of sectoral growth rates with proportion of output produced in the individual sectors as weights: 3 The average contribution of the services sector to growth in entire decade was surely more than that of the other two sectors. It is only in the first few individual years that the contribution of the services sector was not the highest. 3

g y = w a.g a + w m.g m + w s.g s It follows that the sectoral contribution of the i th sector to growth can be written as (w i.g i / g y ) In the above expression w i is the output share of the i th sector, g i is the growth rate of the i th sector and g y is the aggregate growth rate. It follows that the contribution of a sector to growth is high either if the growth rate of the sector is high or if the share of the sector in national output is high. A high sectoral growth rate will, of course, produce a high sectoral share over time and a fast growing sector will ultimately contribute doubly to the aggregate growth in the economy, i.e., both because it is growing at a high rate and because it has become an important component of the total. As we see below, this is what has happened in the context of the services sector in India. It must be noted that, in the above measure, when the g i in the numerator increases, g y in the denominator also increases, but by less than the increase in g i, since w i is less than unity. 3. Estimating the contribution of the Services Sector using Indian Data We estimate the contribution of the services sector to aggregate output and growth using the sectoral GDP data. 4 Data was available from 1950-51 to 2006-07. Seven-year moving averages were used on the original data to smoothen these as the contributions to growth computed on the original data were erratic. 5 The smoothened data is summarized in Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4. Table 1 gives the yearly sectoral composition, sectoral growth rates and the sectoral contribution to growth for the smoothened data for the years 1953-4 Data was downloaded from the website of the Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation as accessed on 27-3-09. 5 The smoothing effect by calculating the moving averages is seen by comparing charts giving the sectoral shares, respectively, for the original data and their moving averages. The effect is seen much more sharply from charts which show the growth rates for the original and the smoothened data. These charts have not been reported here. 4

54 to 2003-04. 6 The sectoral contribution to growth is computed using the formula developed in Section 2 above. Tables 2, 3 and 4 give, respectively, the sectoral composition of output in India, sectoral growth rates and the sectoral contribution to growth for each of the decades from the 1950s to the 2000s, though, of course, the number of years averaged in the last decade is less than ten years. From the first three columns in the body of Table 1 and from Chart 1 it is evident that the share of services has overtaken that of agriculture since 1982-83, a conclusion which is not as sharp in the original data as in the 7-year moving averages that are reported in Table 1. The share of services has always dominated that of industry and continues to do so by a wider absolute margin in percentage point terms since the end 1960s. The share of industry is nevertheless increasing and has overtaken the decreasing share of agriculture toward the end of our period in 2002-03. From the middle three columns of Table 1 and from Chart 2 it is clear that the 7-year moving average of agricultural growth rate has been the lowest among the three sectors in all the years, except 1972-73 when it was marginally higher than that of industry, though not higher than that of services. The 7-year moving average of industrial growth rate was the highest among the three sectors up 1967-68. Since 1968-69 up to the early 1980s, the services sector growth rate has been, by and large, the highest, though there are some years when the industrial growth rate dominates. The services growth rate has overtaken the industry growth rate decisively since 1979-80 and continues to remain the highest thereafter. Since 1982-83, therefore, when the share of services in output turned the highest, the services sector has dominated the other two sectors both in terms of share and growth rate. In terms of the formula developed above and as seen from Chart 3 and the last three columns of Table 1, the contribution of the services sector to growth has always dominated the contribution of the other two sectors. Since the contribution of a sector to growth is the product of its share and own growth rate and since the both the share and 6 Three years have been lost at each end due to taking 7-year moving averages of the data. 5

growth rate of the services sector has been the highest since 1982-83, it follows that contribution of services to growth will be the highest in the post 1982-83 period. In the earlier years too, though the share and the growth rate of the services sector have not been individually the highest, these have been high enough for the product to turn out to be the highest among the three sectors. As the Chart 3 and Table 4 show, the contributions to growth of agriculture and industry have been declining as a trend, whereas that of the services sector has been continuously increasing. In the 2000s, services have contributed two-thirds of the growth in a static sense, and industry one-fourth, whereas agriculture s contribution to total growth is less than ten per cent. Charts 4, 5 and 6 show that agriculture s contribution to growth has been consistently less than its share, with both declining; the contribution of industry has been declining, which, in the context of increasing share means, that the contribution of industry to growth as a percentage is becoming lower than its share at the end of the study period. It is only services which has an increasing share and contribution, with the contribution dominating the share in all years. This is the sense in which Indian growth is services-led. 4. Conclusions Two points can, however, be made in conclusion. First, in the above sense, Indian growth has always been services-led this is not a recent phenomenon. Secondly, as brought out in the introduction, this is a static interpretation of the term services-led growth. A more dynamic interpretation in which productivity-based externalities from the services to the other sectors of the economy lead to an acceleration of growth in these sectors needs further elaboration. References 1. Chenery, H.B. and M. Syrquin (1975), Patterns of Development, 1950-70, Oxford Univ Press, London. 2. Rao, V.K.R.V. (1983), India s National Income: 1950-1980, Sage Publications, Delhi 6

Table 1: Sectoral Shares, Growth Rates and Contributions to Growth in India 1950-51 to 2006-07 (7-Year Moving Average) Share in Output Growth Rate Contribution to Growth Year Agr Ind Ser Agr Ind Ser GDP Agr Ind Ser 1954 55.91 14.32 29.77 - - - - - - - 1955 55.35 14.64 30.01 2.13 5.41 4.00 3.15 37.33 25.09 38.04 1956 55.02 14.90 30.08 3.32 5.81 4.18 3.94 46.28 21.97 31.93 1957 54.43 15.32 30.25 2.69 6.69 4.39 3.80 38.54 27.01 34.97 1958 53.75 15.81 30.44 2.73 7.39 4.68 4.04 36.36 28.97 35.33 1959 52.95 16.32 30.73 2.31 7.21 4.85 3.86 31.69 30.49 38.66 1960 52.12 16.77 31.10 2.13 6.61 4.99 3.74 29.65 29.67 41.50 1961 51.13 17.32 31.55 1.74 7.06 5.20 3.71 23.97 32.96 44.27 1962 50.48 17.83 31.69 3.61 8.06 5.40 4.95 36.81 29.07 34.63 1963 49.23 18.53 32.25 0.65 7.27 5.03 3.22 10.00 41.83 50.36 1964 48.07 19.18 32.75 0.59 6.65 4.61 3.01 9.36 42.41 50.22 1965 47.30 19.62 33.07 1.64 5.66 4.31 3.29 23.58 33.80 43.43 1966 46.55 20.05 33.40 1.57 5.42 4.22 3.20 22.81 33.97 44.00 1967 46.05 20.41 33.54 2.73 5.74 4.31 3.86 32.55 30.37 37.43 1968 45.82 20.53 33.65 3.37 4.52 4.23 3.90 39.68 23.85 36.53 1969 45.31 20.72 33.98 1.82 3.88 3.96 2.96 27.81 27.13 45.42 1970 44.95 20.84 34.21 2.49 3.91 4.03 3.31 33.87 24.63 41.66 1971 44.87 20.78 34.35 3.60 3.47 4.19 3.78 42.80 19.09 38.14 1972 44.33 20.84 34.83 1.62 3.16 4.28 2.85 25.12 23.06 52.30 1973 44.19 20.75 35.06 3.49 3.38 4.51 3.82 40.30 18.38 41.39 1974 43.60 20.88 35.52 1.70 3.73 4.43 3.08 24.08 25.32 51.09 1975 43.07 21.10 35.84 2.26 4.58 4.45 3.52 27.62 27.43 45.29 1976 42.51 21.34 36.16 2.82 5.36 5.09 4.17 28.70 27.45 44.17 1977 41.78 21.52 36.70 1.41 4.07 4.75 3.18 18.48 27.50 54.75 1978 41.24 21.70 37.06 2.30 4.47 4.63 3.62 26.17 26.77 47.39 1979 40.82 21.92 37.25 3.18 5.33 4.78 4.24 30.64 27.55 42.00 1980 40.07 22.13 37.80 1.55 4.44 4.99 3.46 17.89 28.33 54.50 1981 39.80 22.15 38.05 3.75 4.55 5.10 4.44 33.63 22.70 43.75 1982 39.29 22.20 38.51 2.64 4.21 5.27 3.99 26.02 23.44 50.86 1983 38.73 22.19 39.08 2.36 3.78 5.36 3.83 23.87 21.89 54.68 1984 38.34 22.16 39.50 4.00 4.92 6.19 5.06 30.28 21.56 48.34 1985 37.47 22.28 40.25 2.20 5.16 6.54 4.57 18.01 25.16 57.61 1986 36.93 22.30 40.78 3.82 5.40 6.74 5.35 26.37 22.51 51.41 1987 36.27 22.45 41.28 3.90 6.50 7.05 5.76 24.52 25.31 50.51 1988 35.53 22.63 41.84 3.28 6.29 6.88 5.44 21.43 26.17 52.87 1989 34.78 22.73 42.49 2.73 5.39 6.57 4.94 19.20 24.80 56.56 1990 34.26 22.76 42.98 3.54 5.22 6.31 5.10 23.76 23.32 53.20 1991 33.81 22.78 43.41 3.88 5.42 6.34 5.28 24.80 23.36 52.05 1992 33.49 22.86 43.65 4.68 6.00 6.26 5.67 27.67 24.21 48.20 1993 32.61 23.15 44.24 2.66 6.80 6.84 5.43 15.96 28.98 55.74 1994 32.00 23.36 44.65 3.79 6.70 6.76 5.78 20.97 27.09 52.25 1995 31.16 23.46 45.38 2.83 6.06 7.31 5.58 15.78 25.48 59.39 1996 30.46 23.51 46.03 3.88 6.47 7.78 6.26 18.89 24.31 57.23 7

Table 1: (Concld.) Sectoral Shares, Growth Rates and Contributions to Growth in India 1950-51 to 2006-07 (7-Year Moving Average) Share in Output Growth Rate Contribution to Growth Agr Ind Ser Agr Ind Ser GDP Agr Ind Ser Year 1997 29.61 23.53 46.86 3.42 6.48 8.30 6.39 15.84 23.88 60.92 1998 28.72 23.62 47.66 2.91 6.54 7.93 6.12 13.64 25.27 61.80 1999 27.92 23.54 48.55 3.09 5.63 8.01 6.04 14.28 21.97 64.44 2000 27.01 23.44 49.55 2.09 5.12 7.70 5.53 10.21 21.70 69.05 2001 26.12 23.35 50.54 2.26 5.30 7.86 5.75 10.27 21.55 69.09 2002 25.22 23.40 51.38 2.53 6.45 7.98 6.20 10.28 24.35 66.15 2003 24.24 23.56 52.19 2.58 7.44 8.37 6.69 9.36 26.18 65.28 2004 23.24 23.83 52.93 2.78 8.47 8.75 7.24 8.93 27.89 64.00 Source: Computations made by the author from the data on sectoral GDP downloaded from the website of Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. The computations have been done on smoothened data by taking 7-year moving averages of the original data. 8

Table 2: Decadal Sectoral Composition of Output in India 1950s to 2000s (Per cent of GDP) Sector: Agriculture + Manufacturing + Services GDP Decade 1950s 54.22 15.44 30.34 100.00 1960s 47.49 19.50 33.01 100.00 1970s 42.65 21.29 36.06 100.00 1980s 37.14 22.38 40.47 100.00 1990s 30.68 23.33 46.00 100.00 2000s 24.70 23.54 51.76 100.00 Table 3: Decadal Sectoral Growth Rates in India 1950s to 2000s (Per cent per annum) Sector: Agriculture + Manufacturing + Services GDP Decade 1950s 2.55 6.52 4.52 3.75 1960s 2.02 5.82 4.53 3.54 1970s 2.39 4.20 4.61 3.57 1980s 3.22 5.14 6.20 4.85 1990s 3.32 6.12 7.32 5.81 2000s 2.54 6.91 8.24 6.47 Table 4: Decadal Sectoral Contributions in India 1950s to 2000s (Per cent per annum) Sector: Agriculture + Manufacturing + Services GDP Decade 1950s 36.64 27.20 36.16 100.00 1960s 26.04 32.00 41.95 100.00 1970s 28.18 25.09 46.73 100.00 1980s 24.71 23.69 51.60 100.00 1990s 17.80 24.63 57.57 100.00 2000s 9.71 24.99 65.30 100.00 Source: Tables 1 and 2 are computed using Data downloaded from the website of Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation accessed on 19-02-09. Table 3 is computed from the data used to compute Tables 1 & 2 using the formula developed in Section 2 of the Text. As explained in Section 3, the computations were done on 7-year moving averages of the original data. 9

60.00 50.00 Chart 1 Sectoral Shares of National Output: 1953 54 to 2003 04 (7 Year Moving Average) Axis Title 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 Agriculture Industry Services 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 Chart 2 Sectoral and Aggregate Growth Rates in India: 1954 55 to 2003 04 (7 Year Moving Average) 1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 Agriculture Industry Services Aggregate 10

80.00 70.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 Chart 3 Sectoral Contribution to Growth: 1954 55 to 2003 04 (7 Year Moving Average) 1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 Agriculture Industry Services Linear (Agriculture) Linear (Industry) Linear (Services) 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 Chart 4 Agriculture Share in Output versus Agriculture Contribution to Growth: 1954 55 to 2003 04 (7 Year Moving Average) 1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 Agriculture Share Linear (Agriculture Contribution) Agriculture Contribution 11

Chart 5 Industry Share in Output versus Industry Contribution to Growth: 1954 55 to 2003 04 (7 Year Moving Average) 45.00 40.00 35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 Industry Share Industry Contribution Linear (Industry Contribution) Chart 6 Services Share in Output versus Services Contribution to Growth 1954 55 to 2003 04 (7 Year Moving Average) 80.00 70.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 Services Share Services Contribution Linear (Services Contribution) 12