The Potential Budgetary Costs and WTO Implications of the New Farm Bill Joseph Glauber and Pat Westhoff Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium s (IATRC s) 2014 Annual Meeting: Food, Resources and Conflict, December 7-9, 2014, San Diego, CA. Copyright 2014 by Joseph Glauber and Pat Westoff. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies.
The Potential Budgetary Costs and WTO Implications of the New Farm Bill Joseph Glauber, USDA Office of the Chief Economist (Jglauber@oce.usda.gov) Pat Westhoff, FAPRI-University of Missouri (westhoffp@missouri.edu) IATRC Annual Meeting, San Diego December 8, 2014
Agenda Background New farm bill Budget outlays WTO reporting How we did the analysis Results Budget outlays WTO internal support reporting under URAA or proposed Doha rules
Some 2014 farm bill changes Eliminates direct and countercyclical payments (DCP), average crop revenue election (ACRE) program, dairy price supports Creates new programs tied to market outcomes Price loss coverage (PLC): payments when program crop prices fall below a trigger Agriculture risk coverage (ARC): payments when program crop revenues (national price times county or farm yield) fall below a trigger New area-based crop insurance programs (STAX and SCO) Margin protection program (MPP): payments when margin between milk and feed prices falls below a trigger
Prices triggering payments 2008 farm bill target prices (CCPs if farm price < target price - DP rate) 2014 farm bill reference prices (PLCs if farm price < reference price) Price triggering ARC CO payments in 2014 under 2014 farm bill* Corn ($/bu) $2.63 $3.70 $4.55 Soybeans ($/bu) $6.00 $8.40 $10.55 Wheat ($/bu) $4.17 $5.50 $5.68 Upland cotton (cents/lb.) 71.3 n.a. n.a. Long-grain rice ($/cwt) $10.50 $14.00 $11.70 Sorghum ($/bu.) $2.63 $3.95 $4.38 Peanuts ($/ton) $495 $535 $444 *The price triggering ARC-CO payments will vary across counties and years. These estimates assume the 2014 county yield = Olympic average of county yields for 2009-2013. If a county s 2014 yield is higher than the Olympic average yield, the price triggering payments will be lower. For example, there are Missouri counties where high 2014 yields may mean corn prices would have to drop below $3.20 for 2014 ARC-CO payments.
Some key things to note about the new crop policies Payments for ARC and PLC are (mostly) tied to fixed acreage bases Producers generally cannot increase payments by planting more or getting higher yields on their farms (and can still get payments if they plant nothing) Exception 1: plantings on generic (former cotton) base do affect payments Exception 2: an individual version of ARC makes payments tied to current production on a farm Payments are uncertain, but do have upper limits ARC cannot exceed 10% of benchmark on 85% of base (65% if individual version of ARC) PLC cannot exceed gap between reference price and loan rate on 85% of base, and is tied to program yields fixed for the next five years Overall payment limitation of $125,000 per producer
Budget outlays under the new farm bill Crop and dairy payments are uncertain because of uncertain Prices Yields Participation rates (producers make 1-time choice of ARC or PLC) For example Suppose all corn farmers choose PLC (they won t, but it makes the math easy) USDA s November WASDE: 2014/15 price range is $3.20-$3.80 per bushel Means PLC payments could be 0 or as much as $0.50/bu. ~90 million base acres * ~125 bu. program yield * $0.50 * 0.85 = ~$4.8 bil. In other words, for one crop in one year that is already 3 months completed, the possible PLC payments are somewhere between zero and $4.8 billion. Probably.
WTO internal support rules: URAA Under URAA, countries agree to limit certain amber box subsidies (current aggregate measure of support) Includes payments and other subsidies with a link to prices and/or production And value of price support programs for sugar (and formerly dairy) But excludes product specific de minimis support (<5% of production value for the product in question) And non-product support if the total is de minimis (<5% of value of all agricultural production)
WTO internal support rules: Doha modalities Under a 2008 Doha Round proposal U.S. allowed total current AMS limit reduced to $7.6 bil. (from $19.1) New blue box (for programs like former CCPs) limited to $4.8 bil. De minimis exemption reduced to 2.5% of the value of production Product-specific limits both for product-specific amber support and for blue box support Cap on overall trade-distorting support (OTDS) of $14.5 billion
Assumed WTO classifications of 2014 farm bill programs URAA Marketing loan benefits Product specific amber Product specific amber Agriculture risk coverage (ARC) Non-product specific amber Blue Price loss coverage (PLC) Non-product specific amber Blue Crop insurance premium subsidies (includes SCO) Non-product specific amber Doha Non-product specific amber Cotton STAX insurance subsidies Product specific amber Product specific amber Sugar price support program imputed value Dairy margin protection program (MPP) net payments Product specific amber Product specific amber Product specific amber Product specific amber
How we did the analysis Starting point: FAPRI-MU March 2014 stochastic baseline Includes 2014 farm bill provisions 500 10-year projections for 2000+ variables Based on integrated models for crops, livestock, farm income, government outlays, consumer food costs And correlated draws on exogenous variables (error terms from yield and demand equations, energy prices, production costs, etc.) Augmented with WTO accounting equations Translate other model output into estimates of AMS, blue box support, etc. For each year, can generate support measure distributions And calculate share of outcomes exceeding various commitments
U.S. farm prices for corn Dollars per bushel 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Actual/mean 90th percentile 10th percentile Reference 1 0 05/06 07/08 09/10 11/12 13/14 15/16 17/18 19/20 Source: FAPRI-MU stochastic baseline, March 2014
Corn PLC payments (Dollars per base acre for participating producers) 120 100 95 98 90 80 80 60 49 40 20 14 21 25 26 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 10th %tile 50th %tile Mean 90th %tile Source: FAPRI-MU March 2014 stochastic baseline
Corn ARC payments (Dollars per base acre for participating producers) 60 50 49 53 52 45 40 40 30 20 10 0 25 27 25 24 21 20 16 13 3 3 9 6 1 0 0 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 10th %tile 50th %tile Mean 90th %tile Source: FAPRI-MU March 2014 stochastic baseline
U.S. farm and futures prices for corn 5.00 4.50 Dollars per bushel 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 FAPRI-Mar FAPRI-Nov. Dec. futures Reference Source: FAPRI-MU baselines, Mar. and Nov. 2014; CME December futures contracts, Dec. 3, 2014
2014/15 corn yields and prices FAPRI-MU stochastic baseline, March 2014 Corn price, dollars per bushel 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Avg. of March estimates: 163.5 bu./a. and $4.17/bu. November USDA estimates: 173.4 bu./a. and $3.50/bu. 1 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 Corn yield, bushels per acre
Farm program outlays (billion dollars, fiscal year basis, mean values for 2014-23) 25 20 15 10 5 0 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 Net CCC Crop insurance Source: FAPRI-MU March 2014 stochastic baseline
Net CCC outlays (billion dollars, fiscal year basis) 25 20 15 10 Actual/mean 90th percentile 10th percentile 5 0 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 Source: FAPRI-MU stochastic baseline, March 2014
Table 3 Mean of 2014 baseline outcomes compared to 2008-11 historical levels Category 2008-11 2014-18 2019-23 Million dollars Product specific amber Dairy 3,267 700 217 Sugar 1,270 1,447 1,523 Other 809 781 984 Total ps amber 5,346 2,928 2,724 Included in AMS 4,824 2,812 2,519 De minimis 522 115 205 Non-product specific amber Crop insurance 5,822 6,755 7,070 CCP 364 na na ARC na 1,700 1,114 PLC na 3,056 3,814 SURE 1,200 na na Other 256 500 500 Total nps amber 7,643 12,011 12,498 Included in AMS 0 2,920 3,035 De minimis 7,643 9,090 9,463 Total reported AMS 4,824 5,733 5,554 Total de minimis 8,165 9,206 9,669 Total Support 12,989 14,938 15,222
Item Average AMS (Million dollars) Proportion of outcomes exceeding URAA limit at least once over period (%) 2014-18 2014-23 2014-18 2014-23 Base 5,733 5,643 51.6 72.6 100% PLC 7,188 7,712 62.0 84.4 100% ARC 2,891 2,715 1.8 2.6
Table 5 Proportion of Outcomes Exceeding Proposed Doha Limits Support Average 2014-23 Mil dollars Proposed limit Mil dollars Proportion of outcomes exceeding limit at least once over 2014-23 AMS 3,063 7,641 34.0 Blue box 4,842 4,773 98.6 OTDS 15,080 14,467 99.8
Table 5 Proportion of Outcomes Exceeding Proposed Doha Limits Support Average 2014-23 Mil dollars Proposed limit Mil dollars Proportion of outcomes exceeding limit at least once over 2014-23 Product specific Amber box Barley 2 29 20.8 Corn 48 1,142 10.8 Upland cotton 587 1,113 69.4 Dairy 526 4,4671 3.4 Oats 0 10 0.8 Peanuts 30 249 33.8 Rice 0 311 0.0 Sorghum 1 44 8.8 Soybeans 37 1,162 7.6 Sugar 1,485 1,100 100.0 Wheat 27 271 19.2
Table 5 Proportion of Outcomes Exceeding Proposed Doha Limits Support Average 2014-23 Mil dollars Proposed limit Mil dollars Proportion of outcomes exceeding limit at least once over 2014-23 Blue box caps Barley 531 32 100.0 Corn 1,931 2,360 98.6 Upland cotton na 1,009 na Oats 5 5 97.8 Peanuts 100 150 99.4 Rice 143 235 94.4 Sorghum 227 107 100.0 Soybeans 678 200 100.0 Wheat 1,150 1,041 98.8
Caveats Estimates are baseline dependent Mean prices, yields, etc. Distributions and correlations Approach is a partial stochastic approach Not all sources of uncertainty considered But model is calibrated to generate distributions judged reasonable Assumptions matter Participation in various programs How programs will be notified
Concluding comments New farm bill creates programs where outlays are uncertain Strong possibility that support under the new bill could exceed U.S. internal support commitments, given assumptions used here Ironically, this happens in part because the final bill made new programs less coupled than originally proposed Linking ARC and PLC to base rather than planted acreage may shift support from product specific to non-product specific amber Under analysis assumptions, this makes it more likely that de minimis level of non-product specific amber support will be exceeded When de minimis is triggered, so is the AMS cap
Concluding comments Under a proposed Doha rules and assumptions of the analysis, the new bill Is likely to at least occasionally exceed blue box and OTDS caps Is very likely to exceed product-specific blue box caps But the lower proposed AMS cap is actually less likely to be exceeded U.S. has just shifted reporting For 2012, U.S. just notified crop insurance as product specific This reduces likelihood of exceeding URAA limits on total current AMS But under Doha modalities, does not help with blue box or OTDS issues