Gini coefficient

Similar documents
POVERTY AND SOCIAL INCLUSION INDICATORS IN Main poverty indicators

POVERTY AND SOCIAL INCLUSION INDICATORS IN Main poverty indicators

POVERTY AND SOCIAL INCLUSION INDICATORS IN Main poverty indicators

1. Poverty and social inclusion indicators

Poverty and social inclusion indicators

The at-risk-of poverty rate declined to 18.3%

European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC)

Measuring poverty and inequality in Latvia: advantages of harmonising methodology

P R E S S R E L E A S E Risk of poverty

A European workshop to introduce the EU SILC and the EU LFS data Practical Session Exploring EU SILC. Heike Wirth & Pierre Walthery

HISTORY OF POVERTY MEASUREMENT AND RECENT STUDIES ON IMPROVEMENT OF POVERTY MEASUREMENT IN TURKEY

Quality of Life Survey (QLS) Year 2008

EU Survey on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC)

Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia INTERMEDIATE QUALITY REPORT EU-SILC 2011 OPERATION IN LATVIA

HS011: Arrears on mortgage or rent payments

The intergenerational divide in Europe. Guntram Wolff

REVISION OF THE CONCEPT OF MEASURING MATERIAL DEPRIVATION IN THE EU

STATISTICS ON INCOME AND LIVING CONDITIONS (EU-SILC))

Copies can be obtained from the:

HS011: Arrears on mortgage or rental payments [Whether the household has been in arrears on mortgage or rental payments in the past 12 months]

EU-SILC USER DATABASE DESCRIPTION (draft)

INTERMEDIATE QUALITY REPORT

Agenda. Background. The European Union standards for establishing poverty and inequality measures

2015 Social Protection Performance Monitor (SPPM) dashboard results

Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC)

Economic, employment and social policies in the new EU 2020 strategy

POVERTY, SOCIAL EXCLUSION AND LIVING CONDITIONS IN MALTA: AN ANALYSIS USING SILC

Research Briefing, January Main findings

Copies can be obtained from the:

National Social Target for Poverty Reduction. Social Inclusion Monitor 2011

FSO News. Poverty in Switzerland. 20 Economic and social Situation Neuchâtel, July 2014 of the Population. Results from 2007 to 2012

CYPRUS FINAL QUALITY REPORT

CYPRUS FINAL QUALITY REPORT

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 21 May /10 SOC 358

Social Class Variations in Income Poverty, Deprivation and Consistent Poverty: An Analysis of EU-SILC

METHODOLOGICAL EXPLANATION INCOME, POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION INDICATORS

2017 Social Protection Performance Monitor (SPPM) dashboard results

Background paper. Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived

CYPRUS FINAL QUALITY REPORT

Background Notes SILC 2014

Living Conditions Survey (LCS) Year Provisional data

Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia FINAL QUALITY REPORT RELATING TO EU-SILC OPERATIONS

Intermediate Quality Report for the Swedish EU-SILC, The 2007 cross-sectional component

FINAL REPORT. "Preparation for the revision of EU-SILC : Testing of rolling modules in EU-SILC 2017"

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 17 November /11 SOC 1008 ECOFIN 781

HELLENIC REPUBLIC HELLENIC STATISTICAL AUTHORITY

FINAL QUALITY REPORT EU-SILC

OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME under THE FUND FOR EUROPEAN AID TO THE MOST DEPRIVED

Poverty and Social Exclusion in the UK. Europe 2020 Poverty Measurement

Social Situation Monitor - Glossary

HELLENIC REPUBLIC HELLENIC STATISTICAL AUTHORITY

Poor Greeks or lazy Greeks?

Final Quality Report for the Swedish EU-SILC

Montenegro. Country coverage and the methodology of the Statistical Annex of the 2015 HDR

Social exclusion, long term poverty and social transfers in the EU: Evidence from the ECHP

Changes to family payments will increase child poverty

Briefing note for countries on the 2015 Human Development Report. Lesotho

EUROPEAN SEMESTER THEMATIC FACTSHEET SOCIAL INCLUSION

INTERMEDIATE QUALITY REPORT EU-SILC Norway

INTERMEDIATE QUALITY REPORT EU-SILC Norway

Internationally comparative indicators of material well-being in an age-specific perspective

Multidimensional poverty measurement for EU-SILC countries

Serbia. Country coverage and the methodology of the Statistical Annex of the 2015 HDR

Intermediate Quality Report Swedish 2011 EU-SILC

Intermediate Quality Report Swedish 2010 EU-SILC

Intermediate quality report EU-SILC The Netherlands

INCOME DISTRIBUTION DATA REVIEW ESTONIA

EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT

EU-SILC 2008 MODULE ON OVER-INDEBTEDNESS AND FINANCIAL EXCLUSION

STATISTICS ON INCOME AND LIVING CONTITIONS (EU-SILC)

Comparing poverty estimates using income, expenditure and material deprivation. Paola Serafino and Richard Tonkin

Final Quality report for the Swedish EU-SILC. The longitudinal component

Economic Standard of Living

Economic Standard of Living

vio SZY em Growing Unequal? INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND POVERTY IN OECD COUNTRIES

Final Quality report for the Swedish EU-SILC. The longitudinal component. (Version 2)

ANNEX 1: Data Sources and Methodology

LABOUR FORCE SURVEY 2017 MAIN RESULTS

ANNEXES. to the proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on the European Social Fund Plus

Oman. Country coverage and the methodology of the Statistical Annex of the 2015 HDR

What is Poverty? Content

Dr. Micheál Collins. The Citizens Assembly

National Social Target for Poverty Reduction. Social Inclusion Monitor 2013

Poverty and Social Exclusion in Bosnia and Herzegovina Insights from the 2011 Extended Household Budget Survey

PRESS RELEASE INCOME INEQUALITY

Economic Standard of Living

Micro and Macro Drivers of Material Deprivation Rates. Research note no. 7/2015

DETERMINANTS OF CZECH DISPOSABLE HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND RELATED HOUSING QUALITY

FYR of Macedonia: Measuring Welfare using the Survey of Income and Living Conditions (SILC)

Intermediate Quality report Relating to the EU-SILC 2005 Operation. Austria

MAIN LABOUR FORCE SURVEY RESULTS FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2018

THE SOCIOECONOMIC GRADIENT IN HEALTH: THE ROLE OF INTRA-HOUSEHOLD RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND DECISION-MAKER S GENDER

INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA. Descriptive study of poverty in Spain Results based on the Living Conditions Survey 2004

MAIN LABOUR FORCE SURVEY RESULTS FOR THE FOURTH QUARTER OF 2013

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

European Inequalities: Social Inclusion and Income Distribution in the European Union

The Social Dimension of the Europe 2020 Strategy Summary of the Report by the Social Protection Committee (2011)

FACT SHEET United Kingdom

Concept note The fiscal compact for social cohesion. European view

Economic Standard of Living

Transcription:

POVERTY AND SOCIAL INCLUSION INDICATORS (Preliminary results for 2010) 1 Poverty and social inclusion indicators are part of the general EU indicators for tracing the progress in the field of poverty and social exclusion. Main source of statistical data, on which basis the general indicators are calculated is the annually conducted Survey on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC). Poverty estimation The poverty line is a monetary indicator identifying the poor in the society. The Eurostat method - 60% of the average 2 total disposable net income per equivalent unit - is applied for calculation of the poverty line. According to the preliminary data from the 2011 survey, the average monthly poverty line in 2010 is 273 BGN per person. The number of persons who are below this line is 1 682.5 thousand, representing 22.47% of the country population. 1. Main poverty indicators At-risk-of-poverty threshold (monthly average in BGN) 212.3 276.5 295.0 273.3 Number of persons below at-risk-of-poverty threshold (in 1 632 1 657 1 565 1 683 thousand) At-risk-of-poverty rate (% of the population) 21.4 21.8 20.7 22.4 At-risk-of-poverty rate before social transfers (% of the population) 40.0 38.8 40.8 40.7 At-risk-of-poverty rate before social transfers with pensions included (% of the population) 27.1 26.4 27.1 27.3 Inequality of income distribution (S80/20) 6.5 5.9 5.9 6.1 Gini coefficient 3 35.9 33.5 33.2 33.5 Compared to the previous year the poverty line decreases by 7.4% and the share of poor population increases by 1.7 percentage points. The social protection system contributes considerably to the poverty decrease. According to 2010 data, if the income from pensions is included into the household s income and the rest social transfers are excluded, the poverty level increases from 22.4% to 27.3%, or by 5 percentage points. And respectively, if the pensions and the rest social transfers are excluded, the poverty level increases to 40.7%, or by 18.3 percentage points, which means that pensions are an important factor in reducing poverty. The main factor influencing the risk of poverty for the prevailing part of population is the economic activity and participation in the labour market. For the observed period, the share of poor is highest among the unemployed and retired persons. Compared to the previous year, highest increase of the risk of poverty 1 Final data will be published in December 2012. 2 Average total disposable income is calculated as median income. This is the income of the household, situated in the middle of the income distribution. 3 Calculated based on data on the distribution of persons and households by income and normalized in the range from 0 to 100. 1

in 2010 is observed among inactive persons - 3.5 percentage points and among unemployed - 3.1 percentage points. 2. At-risk-of-poverty rate by activity status Activity status Employed 7.5 7.4 7.7 7.7 Unemployed 55.0 52.2 48.3 51.4 Retired persons 31.7 36.5 30.0 30.7 Other inactive persons 24.0 24.0 24.4 27.9 Share of poor among employed in 2010 remains the same - 7.7%. Risk of poverty is nearly 5 times higher for the part time employed compared to full time employed. The risk of poverty among working females is lower than among working males. Educational attainment predefines to a great extent the opportunity to find better paid job and is closely correlated with the poverty among employed. More that half of the employed with primary and uncompleted primary education are poor, compared to 27.8% among employed with lower secondary (basic) education. The difference between the employed poor with tertiary education and employed poor with primary or uncompleted primary education is considerable - more than 45 times (1.2% compared to 56.9%). Figure 1. Distribution of the employed by poverty and education in 2010 Tertiary education 98.7 Secondary education 93.3 6.7 Lower secondary education 72.2 27.8 Primary and uncompleted primary education 43.1 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 56.9 % Non-poor households Poor households Poverty estimates in respect the household size show that the poverty is concentrated among one-person aged 65 years and more households, lone parents with children, as well as among households with three and more children. 2

Figure 2. Share of the poor by household type Two adults with three or more dependent children Two adults with two dependent children Two adults with one dependent child Lone parent with dependent children Households with dependent children One person aged 65 years and more One persons aged up to 64 years Households without children 71.1 65.2 15.9 16.3 13.4 13.7 37.7 42.3 23.3 21.7 64.2 61.6 33.0 30.7 21.2 19.4 0 20 40 60 80 2009 2010 % Estimates of the households material deprivation The general indicators on poverty estimates include subjective indicators related to material deprivation. They show the subjective assessment and personal attitude of the persons and households in respect the possibilities to meet individual needs. The subjective indicators are based on the answers of nine questions related to the consumption of specific goods and services (table 3). The preliminary 2010 data show that 43.6% of the population is materially deprived (4 out of 9 indicators). The same share for 2009 is 35.0%. 3. Subjective indicators on material deprivation in 2010 1 2 3 Deprived persons % of population Questions related to deprivations asked to the households Has the household been in arrears, i.e. has been unable to pay on time any of the listed housing costs due to financial difficulties: 2 311 465 30.8 Mortgage repayment for the main dwelling Rent Utility bills for electricity, water, heating, etc. (without expenditures on telephone Hire purchase installments or other loan payments Can your household afford (if wish) a week of holiday away from the home? 5 499 316 73.3 Can your household afford (if wish) consumption of meat, chicken or fish (or their vegetarian equivalent) every second day? 3 809 182 50.7 4 Can your household afford unexpected expenses (dwelling or car repairs; change of washing machine or refrigerator; sudden illness, etc.)? 4 905 239 65.3 5 Does your household have a telephone (incl. mobile)? 313 475 4.2 3

6 Does your household have a color TV? 128 702 1.7 7 Does your household have a washing machine? 792 980 10.6 8 9 Does your household have a car/van (incl. company car for private use)? 1 657 948 22.1 Can your household afford to keep the home adequately warm? 3 471 596 46.2 Data show that highest is the number of households that are limited in respect a holiday away from the home (73.3% cannot afford it) and possibilities to meet with own resources unexpected expenses (dwelling or car repairs; change of washing machine or refrigerator; sudden illness, etc.) - 65.3%. At the same time, 4.2% of the population cannot afford telephone, incl. mobile, 1.7% - color TV, 10.6% - automatic washing machine; each second cannot afford consumption of meat, chicken or fish every second day. Nearly half of the persons (46.2%) limit the heating of their dwelling. Jobless households with low work intensity The survey considers as jobless the households, which members have not been employed during the last four weeks, i.e. all household members aged 16 and more have been unemployed or inactive. The low work intensity of the household is a ratio between the number of months during the previous year, in which each household member aged 18-59 years has been employed (really worked months) and the total number of months that the same household member could theoretically work in case of full employment. If the ratio is lower or equal to 0.20, the household is considered as a household with low work intensity. Preliminary 2010 data show that 10.1% of persons aged 18-59 years live in jobless households or in households with low work intensity. 4. Persons aged 18-59 years, living in households with very low work intensity by gender Total Number of persons (in thousand) 350.3 303.1 322.6 444.4 % of the population 7.7 6.7 7.3 10.1 Male Number of persons (in thousand) 163.1 150.4 155.5 224.0 % of the population 7.1 6.7 7.0 10.2 Female Number of persons (in thousand) 187.2 152.7 167.1 220.3 % of the population 8.2 6.8 7.6 10.1 Combined indicator In relation to the goals set in the Europe 2020 strategy, a combined indicator is calculated for regular monitoring of the countries progress in implementing the national targets. Data from the survey of income and living conditions (EU-SILC) is used for the purpose. The indicator includes at-risk-of-poverty rate, severe material deprivation rate and rate of people living in jobless households or households with low work intensity. 4

The combining of the three indicators shows that in 2010 almost half of the population (49.1%) or 3 693.6 thousand persons need special care to combat poverty, social inequality and exclusion from active work. 5. Population at risk of poverty or social exclusion by gender Total Number of persons (in thousand) 3421 3511.2 3145.4 3693.6 % of the population 44.8 46.2 41.6 49.1 Male Number of persons (in thousand) 1591.9 1624.1 1455.7 1732.3 % of the population 43 44.1 39.8 47.6 Female Number of persons (in thousand) 1829 1887 1689.7 1961.3 % of the population 46.4 48.1 43.3 50.5 5

Methodological notes The Survey of Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) is a part of the European Statistical System (ESS) and is realized based on unified methodology, defined by the Regulation 1177/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council. It provides cross-sectional and longitudinal data on changes in income, level and structure of poverty and social isolation. The target population in EU-SILC consists of all private households and their members, living at the country territory at the reference period. Persons in institutional households are excluded. The survey is conducted on the basis of 4-year rotation panel of private households. The annual sample size is about 7500 addresses/private households, distributed across the country districts. Subjects of survey are the household and all its members aged 16 years and more. The sample consists of 4 rotation groups and each year one of the rotation groups is dropped out and replaced by a new one. The rotation model ensures two types of data: - Cross-sectional (data for the current year of survey); - Longitudinal (data on households that have participated in at least two consecutive years). Two types of questionnaires are used: Household questionnaire; Individual questionnaire for persons aged 16 years and more. Basis concepts: Poverty line The total disposable net income is used in the Eurostat methodology for calculation of poverty line. Poverty line represents 60% of the average total disposable net income per equivalent unit. Equivalent scales Poverty and social inclusion indicators are calculated based on the total disposable net income per equivalent unit. Different equivalent scales are applied due to the different household s composition and number of members. The modified OECD scale is used according to which the first adult household member, aged 14 years and more is given weight 1, the second 0.5 and each child under 14 years of age 0.3. The weights are given to each household member and are summarized in order to obtain the equivalent household size. The total disposable net income of each household is divided to its equivalent size thus creating a total disposable net income per equivalent unit. Weighting Data base for each country consists of different types of weights: - Household weight (target variable DB090) for obtaining the real number of households at the country territory; - Individual weight (target variable RB050) for obtaining the real number of persons at the country territory; 6

- Individual weight for each household member aged 16 years and more (target variable PB040) for obtaining the number of persons aged 16 years and more at the country territory. The individual weight (RB050) is used for calculation of the poverty indicators, since the poverty status is calculated at individual level and the target group is referred to the whole population living in private households. For some of the indicators and namely those concerning persons aged 16 years and more (for instance share of employed poor ), the individual weight for persons aged 16 years and more is used (РВ040). In calculation of the indicators, the weights are corrected with a weighting factor thus eliminating the missing survey cases (RB050a). More information on the poverty and social inclusion indicators can be found at the NSI web page, section Social inclusion and living conditions. 7