Right to Information & Right to Privacy

Similar documents
: The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Central Range 1, Room No 308, New Building 46, Mahatma Gandhi Road Chennai

Ward 2(1), Jammu Jammu

On behalf of the Respondents, Shri Manoj Jain, GM was present at the NIC Studio, Mumbai.

01 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI.... Respondent Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate.

Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi website cic.gov.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2014 (arising out of SLP (C) No.

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi )

The Appellant was present at the NIC Studio, Rohtak.

Scope of the Study: The study is restricted only to the protection of consumers interests and rights in India.

KIC 1286 COM 2007 KARNATAKA INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

WP NO. 507 of IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side

$~23. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7131/2015 % Judgment dated 29 th July, versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.1381 OF Chennai Port Trust.Appellant(s) VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3223/2018 & CM APPLN /2018 & 24073/2018. versus

THE INDIAN JURIST

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :INCOME TAX ACT W.P.(C) 5467/2010 Date of Decision : 2nd February, 2012.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF (Arising out S.L.P. (C) NO OF 2007) Versus

क यस चन आय ग CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION ब ब ग ग न थ म ग

Devilal Modi, Proprietor, M/S... vs Sales Tax Officer, Ratlam And... on 7 October, 1964

C.A. No. 3237/1998 & 3247/1998 (Under Art. 136 of the Constitution of India) INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD...APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2009 D. SAROJAKUMARI APPELLANT(S) Versus

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.91 of 2017

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P. (C.) No.12711/2009. % Date of Decision : Through Mr. Rajat Gaur, Adv.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF Food Corporation of India.Appellant(s) VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: 20 th January, 2010

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 199 of Thursday, this the 30 th day of August, 2018

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION D- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi (Through Video Conferencing)

Withholding taxes on cross-border payments A conundrum? Ernst & Young Webcast Held on 10 February 5.00 p.m. (IST)

2009 NTN (Vol. 41) - 89 [IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] Hon'ble Mr. S.H. Kapadia & Hon'ble Mr. Harjit Singh Bedi, JJ. Civil Appeal No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER Reserved on: 21st February, 2012 Pronounced on: 2nd July, 2012 MAC.APP.

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi Tel:

EY Tax Alert. Supreme Court reaffirms constitutional validity of Aadhaar PAN linking requirement. Executive summary

Arbitration News. Newsletter of the International Bar Association Legal Practice Division. Vol 14 No 2 SEPTEMBER 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 2331/2011

Legislative Brief The Consumer Protection Bill, 2018

Commissioner of Income Tax 24

Examinations for discovery Income Tax Act. Examinations for discovery Excise Tax Act. Consideration on application. Mandatory examination

Advance Ruling. Chapter XV. FAQ s

J.M.PATEL COLLEGE OF COMMERCE 1

RTI ACT Information to be published under the Act

UNDERSTANDING-- TAXATION SYSTEM

Tax Planning and Ethics in Taxation

Legislative Brief The Competition (Amendment) Bill, 2006

Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi. OA No.571/2017

[2016] 68 taxmann.com 41 (Mumbai - CESTAT) CESTAT, MUMBAI BENCH. Commissioner of Service Tax. Vs. Lionbridge Technologies (P.) Ltd.

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 346 of 2018

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 2952 of 2012

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 VERSUS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.9365 OF 2017 VERSUS WITH

Title: Hakeem Tanveer V/s PIO Vigilance Organization Kashmir and PIO Forensic Science Laboratory, Jammu

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI CENTRAL -III. Mr. P Roy Chaudhuri, sr. standing counsel for revenue Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Adv.

BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY

FORM NO 21 (See Rule 102 (1) ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOLKATA APPLICATION NO: O.A. 10 OF 2011 THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT W.P.(C) 1254/2010 DATE OF DECISION :

Ningamma & Anr vs United India Insurance Co.Ltd on 13 May, 2009

[Published in 406 ITR (Journ.) p.73 (Part-3)]

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Advocate. Versus

RANCHI CLUB LTD. IS STILL GOOD LAW [Published in 267 ITR (Jour.) p.40 (Part-5)]

Independent Auditor s Report

ONE DAY SEMINAR ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF Employees State Insurance Corporation & Anr.

ALL INDIA BANK OFFICERS CONFEDERATION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Decided on: 13th February, 2015 MAC.APP. 84/2014

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT RESERVED ON: PRONOUNCED ON: ITA No.119/2012

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR C.S.T.A. NO.

Q & A_MTP_ Final _Syllabus 2016_ June 2017_Set 1 Paper 16 Direct Tax Laws And International Taxation

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.2530 OF Birla Institute of Technology.Appellant(s) VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. ITA No.798 /2007. Judgment reserved on: 27th March, 2008

RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LIMITED

PRIORITIES ALBANIA MAY 2013

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. Judgment delivered on : ITA Nos. 697/2007, 698/2007 & 699/2007.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction (Original Side) I.T.A. No.264 of 2003

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of decision : 26 th November, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. Through Mr.P.K.

* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Decided on GROUP 4 SECURITAS GUARDING LTD. Versus AND. Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.5282/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 2nd July, 2013

WHAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY FINANCED BY GOVERNMENT

Commissioner of Income-Tax Vs. Punjab Chemical & Crop Protection Ltd

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO.360 of 2016 (Arising from the SLP(Civil) No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No of 2018) VERSUS

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 221/2014 & CM APPL.13917/2014. Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Ex F.A 7/2011. Reserved on : Date of Decision :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DVAT ACT, 2004 Decided on : ST.APPL. 65/2014. versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Decision: FAO(OS) 455/2012 and CM No.

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.

To The Governor, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai Respected Sir,

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: ITA 612/2012

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment Reserved on: 11 th November, % Judgment Pronounced on: November 29, 2010

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: Mr Ajay Verma, Adv. Through: Mr R.K. Saini, Adv with Mr Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Adv. AND LPA 709/2012.

Present: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH C.A.V. on: Pronounced on:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

versus M/S GLAM X ENTERTAINMENT & ANR Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

Transcription:

Right to Information & Right to Privacy Anjali Bhardwaj National Campaign for Peoples Right to Information & Satark Nagrik Sangathan (Society for Citizens Vigilance Initiative)

Relevant provision of the Indian RTI law Information exempt from disclosure: S. 8(1) (j) information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual unless the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer or the appellate authority, as the case may be, is satisfied that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information:

Mandatory exceptions to the exemptions Mandatory exceptions to the exemptions in the RTI Act Public interest override 8(2) Parliamentary access exception (proviso to 8(1)) Minimising exemptions after twenty years 8(3) Mostly ignored by adjudicators Restrictive interpretations of 8(1)(j) by adjudicators

Information Available under RTI Relevant judgments Assets of candidates contesting elections Assets of judges Assets of bureaucrats Tax Returns of public servants Tax Returns of members of public Yes, of candidates, spouses and dependent children Voluntarily disclosed, pending before constitution bench No, unless larger public interest No, unless larger public interest No, unless larger public interest Assets & Tax Returns Supreme Court judgements (ADR & PUCL) and election laws question is not of knowing personal affairs but to have openness in democracy for attempting to cure cancerous growth of corruptions by few rays of light. ADR 2002 When there is a competition between the right to privacy of an individual and the right to information of the citizens, the former right has to be subordinated to the latter right as it serves larger public interest. PUCL 2003 Question pending before constitution bench- Whether the information sought for is exempt under Section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act? Girish Ramchandra 2012: The details disclosed by a person in his income tax returns are personal information which stand exempted from disclosure under clause (j) of Section 8(1) of the RTI Act, unless involves a larger public interest Girish Ramchandra 2012 SC Girish Ramchandra 2012

Performance evaluation, transfers and postings of public servants not accessible under RTI, unless larger public interest Supreme Court in 2012: copies of all memos issued to the third respondent, show cause notices and orders of censure/punishment etc. are qualified to be personal information as defined in clause (j) of Section 8(1) of the RTI Act. The performance of an employee/officer in an organization is primarily a matter between the employee and the employer and normally those aspects are governed by the service rules which fall under the expression personal information, the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or public interest. On the other hand, the disclosure of which would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy of that individual. (Girish Ramchandra 2012) Subsequently in 2017, information on transfer and posting, date of joining, designation, details of promotions denied under 8(1)(j). (Canara Bank judgment)

Information related to educational qualifications Central Information Commission directed disclosure of degree related information Delhi University has approached the Delhi High Court challenging the order University has invoked section 8(1)(j) and 8(1)(e)

Supreme Court judgment on privacy Constitution bench of the Supreme Court of India in August 2017 held that privacy is a fundamental right (Justice K. S. Puttaswamy and Anr. vs Union Of India And Ors.)

Chilling effect on the RTI Apprehensions that the judgement is likely to be quoted by PIOs to deny critical information Proactive disclosures of details of beneficiaries of social welfare programmes removed

Balancing privacy and peoples right to information Key principles: Public record Public interest Accountability- Expenditure of public funds Public activity Severability, where applicable For genuine security concerns- information may be withheld for a specific context and for a period of time