Audit & Compliance Guidance

Similar documents
GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY. for the programming period

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU)

Guidance document on. management verifications to be carried out by Member States on operations co-financed by

Table of contents. Introduction Regulatory requirements... 3

COMMISSION DECISION. of on technical provisions necessary for the operation of the transition facility in the Republic of Croatia

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 291 thereof,

European GNSS Supervisory Authority

Guidance for Member States on the Drawing of Management Declaration and Annual Summary

COMMISSION DECISION. of ON THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF THE SCHENGEN FACILITY IN CROATIA. (only the English text is authentic)

COMMISSION DECISION. of

OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET

Fact Sheet; Errors, financial corrections, irregularities, recoveries and withdrawals

Version 4: 29 th June 2017

FINANCIAL REGULATION

Official Journal of the European Union

CB/15/S48/4/AN1/REV2/EN(O)

PRIME FINANCIAL POLICIES

Internal Audit Report DOLLIS JUNIOR SCHOOL 27 March 2017

COMMISSION DECISION. C(2007)6121 of 12/12/2007

Review of Registered Charites Compliance Rates with Annual Reporting Requirements 2016

The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority s Magnox contract

Common Agricultural Policy Futures programme

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

FLC Guidance. Page 1. Version. September *Disclaimer: This is a living document and further content will be developed at a later stage.

Internal Audit Report

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. EGESIF_ final 22/02/2016

OFFICIAL. Date and Time 15 th May 2018 SPA Boardroom, Pacific Quay Forensic Services Budget Management and Month End Guidelines Item Number 10.

Department of Enterprise, Trade & Employment

The control system for Cohesion Policy

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

DECISION No 20 OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD OF THE EUROPEAN ASYLUM SUPPORT OFFICE of 27 December 2013 on the EASO Financial Regulation

ANTI-FRAUD STRATEGY INTERREG IPA CBC PROGRAMMES BULGARIA SERBIA BULGARIA THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA BULGARIA TURKEY

Financial Regulation of the European Maritime Safety Agency. Adopted by the Administrative Board on 18 December 2013

14287/12 ADD 6 REV 1 UH/cs 1 DG G 1

LIST OF FINAL GUIDANCE NOTES APPROVED BY COCOF FROM 2006 TO 2011

ISSUE 3 - FEBRUARY For the Control of Alcohol Content for the Purposes of Duty Payment

London Borough of Southwark

Internal Audit Incident Management Review

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

INTERREG - IPA CBC ROMANIA-SERBIA PROGRAMME

AUDIT REFERENCE MANUAL FOR THE STRUCTURAL FUNDS

Official Journal of the European Union L 111/13

REPORT. on the annual accounts of the European Asylum Support Office for the financial year 2016, together with the Office s reply (2017/C 417/12)

ENSURING EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE AND FINANCIAL REPORTING

Guidance for Member States on Integrated Sustainable Urban Development (Article 7 ERDF Regulation)

Law. on Payment Services and Payment Systems * Chapter One GENERAL PROVISIONS. Section I Subject and Negative Scope. Subject

Report and Audited Financial Statements

Financial Regulation. Applicable to the budget of the European Medicines Agency. 15 January 2014 EMA/MB/789566/2013 Management Board

MANAGING FOR RESULTS: An Implementation Plan for the City of Portland

FINANCIAL REGULATION

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Articles 31 and 32 thereof,

Recommendation of the Council on Good Practices for Public Environmental Expenditure Management

Factsheet N 15. Anti-fraud strategy

Prospects. The Role of the Corporate Advisor

ESF MANAGING AUTHORITY

Terms of Reference for the Fund Operator The EEA and Norway Grants Global Fund for Regional Cooperation EEA and Norwegian Financial Mechanisms

(Legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Air Partner plc (the Company ) Terms of reference for the Audit and Risk Committee (the Committee )

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

Internal Audit Report. HASMONEAN PRIMARY SCHOOL 31 March 2016

Internal Audit Report

Version Three offer rules - modifications about beneficiaries asking for offers instead of collecting them.

Guidance on a common methodology for the assessment of management and control systems in the Member States ( programming period)

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 29 July 2014 on measures relating to targeted longer-term refinancing operations (ECB/2014/34) (2014/541/EU)

European Commission Directorate General for Development and Cooperation - EuropeAid

Producer Organisation Scheme

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. Pillar 2 (Supervisory Review Process)

Financial Governance Audits

Worcestershire County Council: Use of External Consultants

Fact Sheet 13 Roles and responsibilities in project partnerships

Financial instruments for SME support in practice Case study demonstrating the use of equity instruments Charles HAMILTON, Invest Northern Ireland

Financial Regulation European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) December 2013

Treasury Management Policy. Treasury Management Policy. Working Together. August Borders College 24/10/2011.

Investing in your future

CLOSURE GUIDELINES SEMINAR. Section 4 Submission of closure documents

DG REGIO, DG EMPL and DG MARE in cooperation with OLAF. Joint Fraud Prevention Strategy. for ERDF, ESF, CF and EFF

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 4 June /14 Interinstitutional File: 2013/0340 (NLE) ATO 45

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of

Regulation on the implementation of the European Economic Area (EEA) Financial Mechanism

ENTSO-E Network Code on Electricity Balancing

Audit Committee Annual Report to the Board

Background paper. The ECA s modified approach to the Statement of Assurance audits in Cohesion

Decision of the Administrative Board adopting the

REVIEW OF MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION IN THE WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION (WMO): ADDITIONAL ISSUES

The Global Fund. Financial Management Handbook for Grant Implementers. December 2017 Geneva, Switzerland

FICHE 21 MODEL OF DELEGATED ACTS SETTING OUT STANDARD SCALES OF UNIT COSTS VERSION 2-21 OCTOBER Version

THE CURRENCY- IRANIAN RIAL (IRR)

ANNEXES. Statement of the Resources Director. Legal_service_aar_2016_final Page 43 of 60

Draft guide to assessments of licence applications Part 2. Assessment of capital and programme of operations

Internal Audit Report

2 nd INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL EVALUATION of the EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (FRA)

EC Guidance. Management verifications and audit

Practical Guide to procedures for programme. EDF et the BUDGET

Fixed assets. 23. Asset register. 24. Depreciation, security and disposals

Overview of the Northern Ireland Ireland - Scotland VA Programme. Electric Vehicles Call Workshop

Appendix B - Treasury Management Policy 2019/20

L 84/42 Official Journal of the European Union

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Transcription:

Audit & Compliance Guidance Green Infrastructure Fund Guidance for Applicants September 2018

Disclaimer Applicants should be aware that as the Green Infrastructure Fund is a new programme, the guidance will be reviewed as the programme evolves and therefore may be subject to change. The European Union and Scottish Ministers reserve the right to amend the National Rules and SNH reserves the right to amend the published guidance during the period of the programme. Decisions to fund Projects will be based on the availability of funding, how well the project matches the Green Infrastructure Fund priorities and its contribution to outcomes as part of the whole Strategic Intervention. These priorities may change during the course of the Strategic Intervention to take into account gaps in meeting priorities in previously funded Projects and not to fund at all. The Scottish Government reserves the right not to award any support at all under this programme. Version Control Date Issue Status Author Authorised by 24/02/16 V1 Draft DP LS 25/02/16 V1 Final DP ZK 21/06/16 V2 Final DP ZK 20/09/18 V3 Final DP FS 1

Contents Disclaimer... 1 Version Control... 1 1. Purpose... 3 Article 4(8) General Principles... 3 Article 72 Management and Control Systems... 3 Article 30 Principles of Economy, Efficiency and Effectiveness:... 4 2. Background... 4 Fig 1 Green Infrastructure Fund Delivery Model... 4 3. Overview Audit, Compliance & Monitoring... 5 Fig 2 The Role of Audit & Compliance Guidance... 6 4. Green Infrastructure Fund, Audit & Compliance Plan... 6 Table 1 Green Infrastructure Fund Audit Type & Frequency;... 6 5. External Monitoring & Audit Framework... 7 Quarterly Claims... 7 Article 125 Pre-Claim Check... 7 Article 125 Progress & Verification Visit... 7 Article 125 Visit... 7 Other Visits... 7 Essential Criteria to Audit & Monitoring Visits... 7 Irregularities... 8 6. Article 72 Management & Control Systems Compliance Guidance for projects... 8 7. Audit Timeline... 11 Table 2 Green Infrastructure Fund Phase 2 Indicative Audit & Compliance Timelines... 11 2

1. Purpose This guidance document sets out to communicate the standards set out within EU Regulations that apply to the Green Infrastructure Fund and how the Lead Partner and grantees will comply with these articles. This guidance also sets out the basic audit framework which the Green Infrastructure Fund will be subject to in order to ensure compliance with these regulations and articles. The requirements for managing an ERDF Fund can be onerous, applicant guidance has been made available and it provides assistance and information to deliver successful projects which is aligned to EU Regulations and National Rules. In addition to outlining the audit requirements for the Green Infrastructure Fund, this guidance provides information and assistance regarding the Management and Administration requirements for an ERDF Fund and considers how to: Implement good practice; Set up systems and processes which are easy to use; Keep a close eye on how the Project is delivering; Ensure that the Project is managed proactively and issues are addressed. The following sets out the articles contained within Regulation 1303/2013 of the Official Journal of the European Union: Article 4(8) General Principles The Commission and the Member States shall respect the principle of financial management in accordance with Article 30 of the Financial Regulation. Article 72 Management and Control Systems (a) Provide a description of the functions of each body involved in management and control, and the allocation of functions within each body; (b) Provide compliance with the principle of separation of functions between and within such bodies; (c) Provide for procedures for ensuring the correctness and regularity of expenditure declared; (d) Provide computerised systems for accounting, for the storage and transmission of financial data and data on indicators, for monitoring and reporting; (e) Provide systems for reporting and monitoring where the body responsible entrusts execution of tasks to another body; (f) Provide for arrangements for auditing the functioning of the management and control systems; (g) Provide for systems and procedures to ensure an adequate audit trail; 3

(h) Provide for the prevention, detection and correction of irregularities, including fraud, and the recovery of amounts unduly paid, together with any interest on late payments. The EU Financial Regulations set out the principles of sound financial management as follows: Article 30 Principles of Economy, Efficiency and Effectiveness: (2) i The principle of economy requires that resources used by the institution in the pursuit of its activities shall be made available in due time, in appropriate quantity and quality and at the best price; (2) ii The principle of efficiency concerns the best relationship between resources employed and results achieved; (2) iii The principle of effectiveness concerns the attainment of the specific objectives set and the achievement of the intended results. 2. Background Due to the inherent risks that onerous ERDF funding compliance brings, along with the scale of projects and the structure of the delivery model, a robust governance and control framework is required if the outcomes are to be successfully delivered in a compliant manner. The following, in Figure 1 below, illustrates the delivery model and indicates at a basic level the layers of audit and compliance. Fig 1 Green Infrastructure Fund Delivery Model European Commission Compliance Layer 4 Flow of ERDF Funds Managing Authority Compliance Layer 3 GI Fund Lead Partner Compliance Layer 2 Management Costs Challenge Fund Compliance Layer 1 Projects 4

Each control layer will bring differing levels of audit and compliance and will be subject to either internal or external audits or both. 3. Overview Audit, Compliance & Monitoring Audit, Compliance and Monitoring will be carried out to ensure the projects are progressing as they should be and that the Green Infrastructure Fund achieves its target outcomes in a compliant manner. Both the Audit & Compliance Plan and the Monitoring & Evaluation Plan will be the primary tools to monitor performance and compliance of the Green Infrastructure Fund. These will allow the following: Assess performance and progress; Maintain financial performance using Budgets and Reforecasts as the primary controls; Identify strengths and weaknesses of delivery and implement corrective action; Compile Interim Progress Reports; Consider lessons learned; Demonstrate good governance; Monitor performance using Performance Indicators; Identify changes through proactive management; Set out clear Roles & Responsibilities; Enable effective communication between Lead Partner and Grantees; Ensure continual compliance with ERDF Rules and Regulations to minimise disallowance or de-commitment risk; Effective identification and management of risk. Figure 2 below illustrates how the Audit and Compliance Plan fits into the Delivery Model Governance. 5

Fig 2 The Role of Audit & Compliance Guidance Article 72 - Management & Control Green Infrastructure Fund Audit & Compliance Guidance Applicant Guidance Application Handbook Eligibility, Data & Information Management, Risk Management, Claims Process, Change Process, Communications Management Costs Projects 4. Green Infrastructure Fund, Audit & Compliance Plan The following provides an outline of the internal audit framework for the Green Infrastructure Fund and relates to the compliance layers 1 and 2 in Figure 1 above. Scottish Natural Heritage, as Lead Partner, will monitor and review the fund through a number of approaches to ensure a robust control framework is maintained. Findings of audits and compliance checks will be used to measure the performance and governance of the Green Infrastructure Fund and form a basis for recommendations if appropriate. The plan will be primarily driven by the quarterly claims cycle as in Table 1 below: Table 1 Green Infrastructure Fund Audit Type & Frequency; Audit Type Risk Based Samples Compliance Checks Performance Measures Frequency Monthly & Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly 6

5. External Monitoring & Audit Framework The following provides an outline of the external audit framework for the Green Infrastructure Fund and relates to the compliance layers 3 and 4 in Figure 1 above. Quarterly Claims The Scottish Government as the Managing Authority will perform verification checks on the claims submitted through EUMIS by Scottish Natural Heritage as the Lead Partner and is performed on a sample basis of approximately 20%. Article 125 Pre-Claim Check This is intended to be a preventative visit by the Scottish Government to identify possible project issues and prevent reoccurrence of problems. This will be ideally conducted within the first 3 months of the Project. This visit offers the opportunity for the Scottish Government as Managing Authority to familiarise themselves with those delivering the Green Infrastructure Fund and assess the monitoring requirements. Article 125 Progress & Verification Visit A member of the Scottish Government Structural Funds Division will conduct one or more indepth monitoring visits during the lifetime of the Project. This will verify the declared expenditure, that the Projects products or services have been delivered in accordance with the Offer Letter and that the Projects claims and activities comply with the European Commission and National Rules. Article 125 Visit Each year, a number of Projects will be selected for an in-depth Article 125 inspection. Article 125 audits are undertaken on a sample basis or on a risk based assessment and will be conducted by the Scottish Government Audit Authority Team. This type of audit can last several days. It is important to note that any irregularities identified during an Article 16 visit will result in funds being recovered directly from the Green Infrastructure ERDF grant. Other Visits There is also the possibility that the Project will be audited by the European Commission or the European Court of Auditors, both of whom select a sample of projects for scrutiny. Essential Criteria to Audit & Monitoring Visits It is essential that key members of staff involved in either Scottish Natural Heritage, as the Lead Partner, or for Projects are available during any Article 125 visits, monitoring visits, in addition to any other audits whether by the Green Infrastructure Fund or external. These should typically be the Project Manager and the person(s) responsible for the Projects financial and claim record keeping. It is the responsibility of the Offer Letter recipient to have all the relevant documentation available for monitoring or inspection purposes. For the Green Infrastructure Fund, this is 7

Scottish Natural Heritage as the Lead Partner and this is built into the management and control systems to allow for a clear audit trail. Irregularities The European Commission definition of an irregularity is given in EC Regulation 1083/2006: any infringement of a provision of Community Law resulting from an act or omission by an economic operator, which has, or would have, the effect of prejudicing the general budget of the Communities by charging an unjustified item of expenditure to the general budget. Action will be taken to follow up and correct any irregularity in a timely manner and steps will be taken to ensure the irregularity is not repeated. If any irregularity is identified, funds will be recovered and deducted from the Green Infrastructure ERDF grant. The basis for sharing or assigning disallowance or de-commitment between the Managing Authority, Lead Partner and Grantees will be set out in the Delivery Contracts and Offers of Grant. 6. Article 72 Management & Control Systems Compliance Guidance for projects The following offers guidance in order to demonstrate compliance with principles of Article 72, which is the under-pinning requirement for the Green Infrastructure Fund for management and control. Referring to the Green Infrastructure Fund Applicant Guidance will assist in compliance with Article 72. Examples are illustrated below and can be found on the Green Infrastructure Fund website: Management and Control Systems will include but not limited to the following: Management Structures; Suitable Management Information Systems (MIS); Financial Systems & Records; Project Files; Data & Information Management Document Retention; 8

Authorisation Limits; Separation of Roles & Responsibilities; Health & Safety; Equal Opportunities; VAT Registration & Insurance; Audit Trail & Verification for Expenditure & Income; Financial Reporting; EU Procurement Rules & Regulations; ERDF Publicity Rules. The following sets out the requirements of Management and Control Systems for the Green Infrastructure Fund and are provided within the headings of Article 72 principles: Principle (a) Provide a description of the functions of each body involved in management and control and the allocation of functions within each body. Principle (b) Provide compliance with the principle of separation of functions between and within such bodies. It is a requirement that the project has management and delivery personnel structures in place and that organisation charts and job descriptions clearly show a person s involvement with an ERDF funded project. The grantee must have Management Information Systems (MIS) in place to assist delivery of the project and should include, minutes of meetings held relating to the project, monitoring reports, databases, spreadsheets or an off the shelf electronic client management system. It is an essential requirement that documents are correct and up to date. Failure to demonstrate that there is accurate evidence of the project, its outputs and activities may result in the project having to repay part of or the entire grant. There should also be a clear document retention policy. There should be clear segregation of duties relating to the appropriate authorisations for bank accounts and delegated duties, who checks and signs claims and who monitors and controls project expenditure. The grantee should also be able to produce regular meaningful financial reports. Procedures and policies should be in place relating to Equal Opportunities, Fair Employment and Health and Safety ensuring that the Grantee is committed to promoting and implementing these policies. The grantee must provide evidence of Employer s and Public Liability Insurance and whether the organisation is VAT Registered. Principle (c) Provide for procedures for ensuring the correctness and regularity of expenditure declared. Principle (d) Provide computerised systems for accounting, for the storage and transmission of financial data and data on indicators, for monitoring and reporting. Principle (g) Provide for systems and procedures to ensure an adequate audit trail. 9

It is essential that the grantee is fully aware that they are subject to and must follow all EC rules and regulations as they will be subject to a full examination of their documentation, systems and processes as part of Article 125 checks. The grantee should maintain accounting records that allow easy identification of the project and any grant income and expenditure to the project. The grantee should have an organised system for filing original numbered invoices and receipts which can be easily retrievable and specific to the Project. The grantee must keep original copies of all documentation which show a complete audit trail for every aspect of the project, from application, staff recruitment and marketing to outputs, finances and evaluations. The documents should be comprehensive, reliable and accessible. Filing structures could include: Management & Administration; Financial; Delivery Outputs and Results. As a minimum, all expenditure relating to the project must be recorded and all financial transactions must be clearly traceable through the Grantee s accounting system. It is advisable to set up separate project files to ensure all records and project files are easily retrievable during a monitoring or audit visit to assist the Project to comply with ERDF requirements. All projects must publicise the fact that they are funded by ERDF. There are strict requirements the Green Infrastructure Fund must adhere to and are laid out in the Green Infrastructure Fund Communications Guidance. If the project is processing personal information covered by the Data Protection Act 1998 and GDPR, it must comply with the data protection principles. Procurement activity must adhere to the principles of transparency, openness, fairness, equal treatment and proportionality and must be adhered to at all times. All procurement of works, goods and services should be based on value for money and in accordance with all relevant law including EU Procurement Directives and EU Procurement Thresholds. Green Infrastructure Fund grants will be suspended, withdrawn or reclaimed for projects if it has been found subsequently that the procurement rules and regulations have not been adhered to. All eligible expenditure must comply with the National Rules for the 2014-2020 ERDF Programme and which are reflected in the Green Infrastructure Fund Guidance. Principle (e) Provide systems for reporting and monitoring where the body responsible entrusts execution of tasks to another body. Principle (f) Provide for arrangements for auditing the functioning of the management and control systems. Principle (h) Provide for the prevention, detection and correction of irregularities, including fraud, and the recovery of amounts unduly paid, together with any interest on late payments. As illustrated in Figure 1, the project delivery will be entrusted to grantees. To ensure successful and compliant delivery of projects, Scottish Natural Heritage as Lead Partner has set-up the following legal, monitoring and reporting systems: An Offer of Grant to the Lead Partner (Scottish Natural Heritage) from the Managing Authority (Scottish Government) which includes the management of Disallowance and De-Commitment arising in the delivery of the Green Infrastructure Fund. A Delivery Contract will be used to establish the project delivery requirements and legal obligations between Scottish Natural Heritage and each grantee. Financial monitoring will include the use of Budgets, Reforecasts and Claims processes to ensure accurate and timely financial reporting of the Green Infrastructure Fund s financial performance. This will include match funding, expenditure defrayment and provide a clear 10

audit trail of how expenditure is recorded and calculated and set out through standard ERDF headings including Capital and Revenue. Financial monitoring will also include the consolidation and review of the Green Infrastructure Fund including the projects and Management Costs. Project performance will be monitored through a Monitoring and Control Plan with the application of performance indicators which will be recorded and reviewed. This will form part of the Project Progress Reports which will be submitted to Scottish Natural Heritage with the claims on a quarterly basis. Project Performance Indicators will include detailed reporting on Contractor Management, Procurement and Community Engagement. The Green Infrastructure Fund will also manage and implement an Audit and Compliance Plan which will audit the activities of the Projects and the Green Infrastructure Fund. This will be based upon and inform the Green Infrastructure Fund s Risk Management Strategy. The Audit & Compliance Plan will apply the combination of a risk based approach using samples and compliance checks. This will include the compliance check of Project Claims submitted and review of Progress Reports on a quarterly basis. Applicant Guidance will be provided which is based upon the Rules and Regulations of ERDF Funding as well as the Lead Partner governance requirements. Guidance includes Roles & Responsibilities, Monitoring and Control and Data and Information Management. 7. Audit Timeline A guide to the audit and compliance timelines for Phase 2 of the Green Infrastructure Fund is given in Table 2 below: Table 2 Green Infrastructure Fund Phase 2 Indicative Audit & Compliance Timelines Claim Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Period Apr- Jun Jul- Sep Oct- Dec Jan- Mar Apr- Jun Jul- Sep Oct- Dec Jan- Mar Apr- Jun Jul- Sep Oct- Dec Year 2019 2019 2019 2020 2020 2020 2020 2021 2021 2021 2021 SG Article 125 Multiple Visits SG Article 125 Annual Audits SG Verification Verification Checks Every Quarter Green Compliance Checks Every Quarter Infrastructure Compliance Green Risk Based Audits Infrastructure Audit EU Audit Multiple Audits 11

12

Published: September 2018 Scottish Natural Heritage Great Glen House Leachkin Road Inverness IV3 8NW www.snh.gov.uk