Table 1: PERS Proposals Organized by Subject

Similar documents
Proposals from the Public on the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) LPRO: LEGISLATIVE POLICY AND RESEARCH OFFICE

PERS Overview Senate Committee on Workforce

PERS Realignment Strategy for Oregon

Webinar will be posted to organization website

Analysis of PERS Cost Allocation, Benefit Modification, and System Financing Concepts January 2013

PERS: By The Numbers

PERS: By The Numbers

PERS: By The Numbers

PERS: By The Numbers

STATE OF OREGON LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL COMMITTEE

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM PROPOSAL 79th Oregon Legislative Assembly 2017 Regular Session

PE RS: By The Numbers

PERS FOR DUMMIES. Presentation to the Oregon Community College Association November 5, Carol Samuels Managing Director

PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT PLAN ENACTMENTS IN 2012 STATE LEGISLATURES. August 31, 2012

Bills Signed into Law

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN APPENDIX TO THE ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2016

State Retirement Legislation

KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Bills Signed into Law

PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT PLAN ENACTMENTS IN 2011 STATE LEGISLATURES. May 30, Ronald K. Snell

Legislators and Other Elected Officials Retirement Benefits

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve

PERS & SB1566 Update: A presentation to SDAO Legislative Days. Kevin Olineck PERS Director January 18, 2019

PERS: Today and Tomorrow

MEMORANDUM. Honorable Jamie Jacobs-May, Presiding Judge, Santa Clara County Superior Court

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN

SENATE BILL No. 13 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER 3, 2013 AMENDED IN SENATE FEBRUARY 6, Introduced by Senator Beall.

STATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ILLINOIS

Defined Benefit Plan Changes

UMATILLA MORROW RADIO AND DATA DISTRICT Pendleton, Oregon. Financial Statements and Independent Auditors' Report. June 30, 2016

TESTIMONY BY THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF TOWNSHIP SUPERVISORS BEFORE THE SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE SENATE BILL 1570 (PN 2366)

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1128

Oregon PERS Hybrid Plan

PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT PLAN ENACTMENTS IN 2010 STATE LEGISLATURES. PRELIMINARY REPORT May 3, Ronald K. Snell

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System

Tier Four Employees ORP and OPSRP Features

House Financial Institutions and Pensions Committee. HB 2448; Moving State Correctional Officers to KP&F

Members of the Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement

Virginia Retirement System Modernization and Pension Reform Changes

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2012

NYSLRS NYSLRS. your retirement plan. Forest Rangers Plan For PFRS Tier 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 Members (Section 383-c)

Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve

PORTABLE PLAN MEMBER GUIDE S U R S STATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

TEXAS EMERGENCY SERVICES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OUTLINE OF ELIGIBILITY, BENEFIT AND CONTRIBUTION PROVISIONS (Aug 2016)

Selected Approved Changes to State Public Pensions to Restore or Preserve Plan Sustainability

A QUICK GUIDE. More comprehensive information is available through your UPSEU Representative and/or the New York State Employees Retirement System.

TRADITIONAL PLAN MEMBER GUIDE S U R S STATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2014

S TAT E U NIVERSITIES R E T I REMENT SYSTEM OF I L L INOIS

UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA RETIREMENT PROGRAM

Members of the Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement

NYSLRS NYSLRS. your retirement plan. En-Con Police Officers Plan For Tier 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 Members (Section 383-b)

2012 Spring Conference. Retirement and OPEB Plans -What s Changing Here (Virginia) And There (Other States) May 24, 2012

INTRODUCTION. the Pension Plan, the Matched Annuity Pension (MAP) Plan, and the Retirement Savings Voluntary Program (RSVP).

PERS/ABP. Considerations for Choosing Between PERS or ABP. Public Employees Retirement System Alternate Benefits Program EA

Senate Bill 1 Executive Summary

O A K L A N D C O U N T Y E M P L O Y E E S ' R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M

House Introduction. Action. Date

1. Monthly Accrued Benefit

City of Grand Rapids. Police & Fire Retirement System. A Summary for Employees

NYSLRS NYSLRS. your retirement plan

Teacher Retirement System of Texas. TRS Update. TASSCUBO Winter Conference

Tier Four Employees ORP and OPSRP Features

S TAT E U NIVERSITIES R ETIREMENT SYSTEM OF I L LINOIS

Kansas Public Employees

CITY OF ALLEN PARK EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S P O L I C E A N D F I R E P L A N

ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE. TIAA-CREF Qualified 401(a) Volume Submitter Plan and Trust For Public Employers MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN

State Universities Retirement System of Illinois

Summary Plan Description. For the. Retirement Benefit Plan of American Airlines, Inc. For. Employees Represented by the

2010 Session: Retirement/Pension Legislation

Dear Trustees of the Local Government Correctional Service Retirement Plan:

Work After Retirement Information for Tier One/Tier Two Retirees

A BILL FOR AN ACT. Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: SECTION 1. Legislative findings. The Legislative Assembly finds that:

SunGard Business Systems LLC Defined Benefit Prototype/Volume Submitter Plan DRAFT 10/30/15

Re: Request Number: Analysis of Potential 2017 Legislation: 5-year Final Average Salary

City of Grand Rapids Police and Fire Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions Measurement

STATE POLICE RETIREMENT BENEFITS TRUST STATE OF RHODE ISLAND ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T AS OF J U N E 3 0, 201 6

PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT PLAN ENACTMENTS IN 2010 STATE LEGISLATURES REVISIONS FOR POSTING WEEK OF MAY 17-21, Ronald K. Snell

ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODS INVESTMENT RETURN SALARY INCREASES INFLATION. Salary Increase Assumptions

STATE POLICE RETIREMENT BENEFITS TRUST STATE OF RHODE ISLAND ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T AS OF J U N E 3 0, 201 5

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System

C I T Y OF GRAND RAPIDS POLICE A ND FIRE R E T I REMENT SYSTEM G A S B S T A T E M E N T NOS. 6 7 A N D 6 8 A C C O U N T I N G A N D F I N A N C I A

SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

RECENT PENSION LEGISLATION AND ITS IMPACT ON CALSTRS BENEFIT PROGRAMS 1 of 9

GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT

RETIREMENT PLAN DESIGN For State Employees (White Paper V) SS for SB 714 with Senate Amendments #1 and #2 Revised April 16, 2010

Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Governmental Oversight and Accountability Committee

KPERS Update. Presented by: Overview, Governor s Budget Proposal and Triennial Experience Study

PLAN DOCUMENT. Ferris State University Section 403(b) Retirement Plan. Restated December 1, 2016

KPERS Update. System Overview. Presented by: House Appropriations Committee

Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement

TO: Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement. Summaries of Legislation Enacted in 1987 Regular Session. DATE: June, 1987

CITY OF PORTLAND, OREGON HYDROELECTRIC POWER FUND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUGUST 31, 2006 AND 2005

Lycoming County Employees Retirement System

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System

Oregon State Board of Higher Education

Employee Choice and Shared Responsibility Public Retirement Program

ACTUARIAL VALUATION OF TOWN OF DAVIE POLICE PENSION PLAN AS OF OCTOBER 1, February, 2014

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A

Transcription:

Summary of s The Senate Committee on Workforce initiated a conversation about the Public Employee Retirement System (PERS) this session and invited proposals from the public for viable options to address its rising costs and long-term sustainability. The Committee has received proposals from 16 individuals and organizations, summarized below. As explained by the Chair and Vice-Chair in a memorandum dated January 27, 2017, the Committee will evaluate the proposals it received by February 28, 2017, using the following criteria: constitutionality, order of magnitude in savings, actuarial soundness, impact on employer contribution rates, impact on state and local budgets, impact on public employee benefits, impact on public employee workforce, equitability of costs and benefits to public employees, and administrative feasibility. Some of the submissions propose multiple changes to the PERS system. The Committee will consider the viability of each proposed change. The proposals are summarized below in two ways. The first table organizes the proposals substantively, separating out discrete ideas from broader proposals and grouping similar ideas presented in more than one submission. The second table organizes the proposals as they were submitted, summarizing each submission in its entirety. Following the tables is a list that identifies the 16 individuals and organizations who submitted proposals by location or affiliation. Table 1: PERS s Organized by Subject General Concept Replace PERS with 401k plan Eliminate pension plan (defined benefit) Expand Individual Account Program (IAP) (defined contribution) Strategies Transfer all PERS accounts to 401k Move all elected officials and judges to 401k with mandatory contribution Discontinue pension program prospectively Offer PERS and OPSRP members cash investment incentive of $8,000 to $10,000 to suspend further investment in their pension account Allow employees to contribute more than 6% to IAP Allow employees more investment options re IAP level of investment risk Move all future OPSRP members to defined contribution model, in which employee contributes 6% and employer contributes 6%, with Senate Committee on Workforce, March 13, 2017 Page 1 of 11

General Concept Redirect or add employee contributions to pension fund Strategies employee option to pay up to additional 6% to IAP; cap employer match at 12% (same as current max), allowing employee to invest up to 18% or more into IAP Redirect all or portion of IAP contributions to pension plan (possibly vary percentage of IAP contributions redirected to pension plan by percentage of funded status of system, e.g., divert entire IAP contribution if funded status is below 80%, half of IAP contribution if funded status is above 80%) Require employee contributions to pension plan in addition to contributions to IAP (potentially differentiate contribution rate by tier level e.g., higher for Tier 1 and Tier 2 than for OPSRP or by salary e.g., no contribution on first $30,000 of salary; allow employees to direct portion of IAP to cover contribution to pension plan) Eliminate IAP for Tier 1 and Tier 2 members; direct their employee contributions to reduce UAL and fund reserve that reduces volatility in employer rates Temporarily redirect Tier 1 and Tier 2 employee contributions into general PERS fund to help fund base retirement benefits until funded ratio reaches 95% or above o Require PERS to establish and fund employer rate stabilization reserve with annual earnings exceeding annual earnings rate, and use funds prior to increasing employer contribution rates o Redirect employee contributions paid directly by employer into employee account for purposes of funding employee pension; include funds in actuarial calculations as employer funds for setting employer rates o Redirect employee contributions withheld from employee pay, depositing 50% into employee account for purposes of funding employee pension and 50% into employee s IAP account o Increase employee contribution rate by 1 to 2 percent a year until rate reaches 12 to 14%, for purposes of redirecting a portion or all to employee account created to fund employee pension Senate Committee on Workforce, March 13, 2017 Page 2 of 11

General Concept Provide new funding sources for PERS Offset employer PERS costs Reduce employee retirement benefits Strategies Fund UAL with savings from furlough days Fund UAL 2% sales tax to fund PERS Fund UAL with tax revenue from sale of marijuana Fund UAL with Oregon State Lottery funds Devote income from revenue reform to systemwide PERS side accounts for rate relief to all employers Require employees to pay their half of social security taxes Require employees to pay for their share of health care benefits Require employees to share costs for employee disability retirement plan benefit Change calculation of FAS from final three years to five or ten years* Cap annual salary at $100k for calculation of FAS* Exclude lump sums for sick leave, vacation leave, or overtime from calculation of FAS* Reduce multiplier for calculation of pension benefit under Full Formula* Raise retirement age* Reduce Money Match annuitization rate from 7.5% to 3.5%* * These concepts are also included in SB 559, SB 560, and SB 913. Increase years of service for full retirement from 30 to 32 years Prohibit employees from drawing on PERS benefits until age 62 Prohibit double-dipping Prohibit agencies from raising employee compensation in return for paying their own health care for purpose of artificially increasing FAS Eliminate annual 2% COLA Suspend COLA until PERS is 90% funded Cap total monthly retirement benefits Direct PERS actuary to use risk-free rate of return in calculating Tier 1 Money Match benefit Set annuity rate for Money Match on real market condition instead of on Assumed Interest Rate Eliminate tax remedy benefit for out-of-state PERS retirees Senate Committee on Workforce, March 13, 2017 Page 3 of 11

General Concept Limit growth of Unfunded Actuarial Liability (UAL) Change PERS investment management practices Calculate contribution rates by category of employee Strategies Align prospective benefits of Tier 1 and Tier 2 members with OPSRP members, except for earlier retirement ages for Tier 1 and Tier 2 Offer PERS members voluntary buyout of pension benefits Offer PERS members paid insurance until age 65 upon early retirement Reduce investment management costs by managing investments internally Establish separate pots for funding different categories of PERS members, such as athletic director, teachers, doctors and nurses, first responders, and public works employees Senate Committee on Workforce, March 13, 2017 Page 4 of 11

Table 2: PERS s Organized by Submission Portland constituent Retired PERS member Veneta constituent Member of Chemeketa Community College Board of Education Representative of Medford Jackson County Chamber 1. Transfer all PERS accounts into 401k safe harbor 2. Limit public employer contributions to 5% match to 401k, based on more than 2 years worked 3. Require employees to pay their half of social security taxes 4. Exclude unused sick leave, vacation leave, and overtime for calculating final average salary (FAS) 5. Require employees to pay for their share of health care benefits 6. Cap all retirement funding to 50% of employee s last 5-year average salary 7. Prohibit employees from drawing on PERS until age 62 8. Prohibit double and triple dipping 9. Reduce the tens of thousands of retired employees getting $7,000 per month or more from PERS Eliminate annual 2% COLA Offer PERS buyout provision, and let workers bargain pay and benefits with union based upon savings Give Tier 1 members opportunity to withdraw funds voluntarily and end their relationship with PERS Concept 1: Implement a voluntary Accelerated Disbursement Option Program (ADO) for retirees already receiving or scheduled to receive PERS benefits, offering PERS Tier 1 recipients lump sum disbursement based on predetermined formula. Fund option by 30- year State revenue bond or state revenue package, available only for limited time. Establish incentives for retirees to choose ADO, such as creation of state tax credit program for charitable donations by ADO volunteers. Concept 2: Implement seven policy adjustments to PERS structure: 1. Move all elected officials and judges to 401k (mandatory contribution) 2. Suspend COLA until PERS is 90% funded Senate Committee on Workforce, March 13, 2017 Page 5 of 11

Portland constituent Jefferson constituent Partner at Concentric Equity Partners, Portland Oregon Business Council 3. Exclude unused vacation and sick leave in calculation of final average salary 4. Calculate final average salary over 10 years instead of 3 years 5. Reduce Money Match annuitization rate to 3.5% 6. Cap final average salary calculation to $100k/year 7. Redirect IAP employee contributions to PERS Start a citizens initiative process on proposal to dismantle current construct of PERS and replace a sustainable PERS that would allow Oregonians to pay for the current workforce and programs. Prohibit agencies from raising employee compensation in return for paying their own health care for purpose of artificially increasing FAS Offer PERS members a buyout of their pension benefits, calculated by taking the present value of each person s accrued retirement benefits, discounted by conservative interest rate, and multiplying it by funded percentage of plan plus five percentage points. Concept 1: Recommendations from Oregon Business Plan White Paper on PERS Reform, submitted to SWF committee for its February 13th meeting: 1. Discontinue pension program prospectively 2. Disallow future use of unused vacation & sick leave as part of final average salary 3. Reduce annuitization rate for Money Match from 7.5% to 3.5% 4. Cap calculation of FAS at $100,000/year 5. Calculate FAS at five years instead of three 6. Reduce factor for calculation of pension benefit 7. Raise retirement age 8. Redirect future employee IAP contributions to pension plan Concept 2: Recommendations from City Club of Portland 2011 Report on PERS Reform: 1. Require PERS Board to direct PERS actuary to use risk-free rate of return in calculating Tier 1 Money Match benefit 2. Eliminate Individual Account Program (IAP) for Tier 1 and Tier 2 members and instead direct annual Tier 1 and Tier 2 employee contribution to reducing Unfunded Actuarial Liability and funding a reserve that can be used to reduce volatility in employer rates Senate Committee on Workforce, March 13, 2017 Page 6 of 11

3. Eliminate tax remedy benefit for out-of-state PERS retirees 4. Require PERS Board to establish employer rate stabilization reserve to increase stability and predictability of employer contribution rates: when PERS investment returns exceed assumed annual earnings rate, require PERS Board to fund reserve to pre-defined level before providing employer rate relief; conversely, when PERS investment returns fall short of assumed annual earnings rate, require PERS Board to pull funds from reserve prior to increasing employer rates 5. Reduce years-of-service multiplier by one-third, from 1.5% to 1.0% for general service employees and from 1.8% to 1.2% for police and fire fighters. 6. Align OPSRP retirement ages with Social Security, both now and as Social Security evolves in the future; increase OPSRP retirement ages by two years across-the-board, and increase by two years retirement ages for police and fire employees. 7. Offer OPSRP employees nearing retirement more IAP investment options Concept 3: Equitable Framework. Addresses disparities among employees with respect to shouldering costs and receiving benefits of PERS. Consider reforms that have effect of: 1. Bringing normal cost of Tier 1 and Tier 2 pension benefits in line with OPSRP on go forward basis, creating equity among current employees in future benefit earnings and costs. 2. Establishing cost sharing by active employees to shoulder remaining share of UAL attributable to their PERS classification (Tier 1, Tier 2, and OPSRP respectively). Ideas for implementing Concept 3: 1. Freeze current employer contribution rates through 12/31/17; 2. Establish following provisions effective 1/1/18: a. Create new tier of benefits for Tier 1 and 2 employees that is identical to OPSRP, except retain earlier retirement ages for Tier 1 & Tier 1 employees, or create new tier of benefits for Tier 1 and 2 that is equivalent to OPSRP in its "normal cost" (measured in payroll contribution rate), and clarify how proration of prior and future service would be calculated for Tier 1 and 2 employees Senate Committee on Workforce, March 13, 2017 Page 7 of 11

Tax Fairness Oregon b. Reduce annuitization rate for Money Match c. Establish employee contribution for pension benefits (distinct from IAP) at all tiers of coverage, Differentiate amount of employee contribution by tiers (not to exceed 6% for Tier 1 and 2 and 3% for Tier 3 employees) and by salary level (e.g. no contribution required on the first $30,000 of salary) Reset employee contribution rates every biennium thereafter (within 3% and 6% maximums) to ensure proportionate increases or decreases in employee rate when the UAL attributable to current employees rises or falls above or below the levels specified in the actuarial report for 2017 Allow employees to direct some or all of their IAPs to cover their contributions to pension plan Make optional redirection of IAP negotiable for represented employees, specifying that, where existing bargaining agreements prohibit such changes, status quo prevails until expiration of such agreements or renegotiation of conflicting provisions 1. Reduce investment management costs by managing investments internally 2. Temporarily redirect Tier 1 and 2 employees future 6% contributions into general PERS fund, separate from money match, to help fund base retirement benefits 3. Authorize automatic adjustment to benefits when system Funded Ratio reaches 95% or above 4. Establish $100,000 limit on final average salary, indexed to inflation for all tiers as PERS reaches its target Funded Ratio goal of 95%. 5. Raise full retirement age to match full Social Security retirement age for all tiers, with police and fire retirement requirements matching OPSRP across system 6. Increase early retirement age to 60 (53 for P&F) across the system, with same P&F five years of continuous service now required in OPSRP 7. Increase years of service for full retirement from 30 to 32 years 8. Exclude lump sums for vacation, sick leave and overtime from calculation of FAS for Tiers 1 and 2 Senate Committee on Workforce, March 13, 2017 Page 8 of 11

Tier 1 PERS member, 33 years in Fire Service, former Trustee of PERS Board Superintendents at Alsea and Lebanon School Districts Salem constituent 9. Reduce Full Formula Benefit Factor to 1% for Tiers 1 and 2 10. Calculate FAS over five years rather than three to balance PERS funding and require employees to contribute to both defined pension benefit and defined contribution savings. 1. Beginning July 1, 2017, deposit any future employee contributions paid directly by employer into employee account for purposes of funding employee pension. a. Use existing accounts for Tier 1 and Tier 2 employees, and create accounts for OPSRP members b. Include funds in actuarial calculations as employer funds for purposes of setting employer rates 2. Beginning July 1, 2017, deposit any employee contributions that are withheld from employee pay, even if considered picked up for tax purposes, 50% into Employee account as described above and 50% into employee s IAP account 3. Beginning July 1, 2017, and each July 1 thereafter, increase employee contribution rate by 1% until rate reaches 12% 4. Accelerated option: increase employee contribution rate by 2% a year to 14% over 4 years Move all future PERS/OPSRP employees to defined contribution model, in which employee contributes 6% and the employer contributes 6% with employee option to pay up to additional 6% into IAP retirement account (or more as per federal limits): 1. Cap employer match at 12% (same as current max), allowing employee to invest up to 18% or more of their pay into IAP 2. Allow each employee to direct level of investment risk on their investments 3. Offer PERS/OPSRP members cash investment incentive of $8,000 to $10,000 to suspend further investment in their PERS or OPSRP defined benefit account 1. Establish $100,000 cap on final average salary used in calculation of member benefits 2. Calculate final average salary by average of five years of wages instead of three Senate Committee on Workforce, March 13, 2017 Page 9 of 11

Oregon Department of Corrections employee Redmond constituent Oregon League of Cities 1. Offer Tier 1 and Tier 2 members paid insurance until age 65 upon early retirement 2. Furlough days 3. Establish 2% sales tax to fund PERS 4. Use tax revenue from sale of pot to fund PERS 1. Establish separate pots for funding different categories of PERS members, such as athletic directors, teachers, doctors and nurses, first responders, and public works employees. 2. Fund PERS by tapping into marijuana taxes or Oregon State Lottery funds 1. Use in-house investment service providers to decrease amount of public dollars to outside investment services 2. Devote income from revenue reform to system-wide PERS side account for rate relief to all employers 3. Redirect IAP contributions to pension plan based on funded status of system, e.g., if funded status is below 80%, divert entire IAP contribution to pension plan; if above 80% funded, divert half of IAP contribution to pension plan 4. Redirect IAP contributions to pension plan by splitting six percent employee contribution, diverting half to IAP and half to pension plan; consider allowing employee to contribute additional amount to IAP 5. Set annuity rate for Money Match on real market conditions instead of on Assumed Earnings Rate 6. Consider cost sharing for employee disability retirement plan benefit Senate Committee on Workforce, March 13, 2017 Page 10 of 11

Location/Affiliation of Individuals Who Submitted s 1 Portland constituent 2 Retired PERS member 3 Veneta constituent 4 Member of Chemeketa Community College Board of Education 5 Medford Jackson County Chamber 6 Portland constituent 7 Jefferson constituent 8 Partner at Concentric Equity Partners, Portland 9 Oregon Business Council 10 Tax Fairness Oregon 11 PERS Tier 1 member, 33 years in Fire Service, former Trustee of PERS Board 12 Superintendents from Alsea and Lebanon School Districts 13 Salem constituent 14 Oregon Department of Corrections employee 15 Redmond constituent 16 Oregon League of Cities Senate Committee on Workforce, March 13, 2017 Page 11 of 11