At the Core: Advisor Views on Investment Trends October 2018
Table of contents Page About the Study 3 Core Strength 4 Beyond the Core: ETFs on the Rise 11 Focus On: Cost and Access 15 Focus On: Fund Choices 19 Focus On: Smart Beta 23 Focus On: Behavioral Finance 28 Independent Advisor Profile 31 Disclosures 33 2
About the study What An online study among a national sample of independent advisors (Registered Independent Advisors) was conducted by Logica Research, formerly Koski Research Logica Research is neither affiliated with, nor employed by, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. When The survey was fielded August 14 to August 31, 2018 381 independent advisors completed the study Who To qualify for the study, advisors had to Provide investment advice to individual clients, manage clients investment assets, or provide financial planning advice Have at least $50M in assets under management Have traded an exchange traded fund (ETF) in the past month for an account they manage 3
Core Strength Advisor views on core investments 4
Advisors believe the majority of client portfolios 62% on average should be allocated to core holdings Percent of client portfolios that should be allocated to core holdings Note: We are defining core as broad large-, mid-, and small-cap equities, broad international equities, and corporate and Treasury bonds. 38% of advisors believe that core should make up 70 100% of holdings. Mean = 62% 5% 100% 33% 70% - <100% 38% 50% - <70% 24% <50% Q1. On average, how much of your clients portfolios do you believe should be allocated to core holdings? We are defining core as broad large-, mid-, and small-cap equities, broad international equities, and corporate and Treasury bonds. (Base: Total = 381) 5
ETFs currently have a slight edge over other investment products at the core Current product allocation of core holdings in client portfolios Other 4% Individual Bonds 18% 29% ETFs Mutual Funds 24% 25% Individual Stocks Q2. On average, what percent of your clients core holdings are currently allocated to the products below? (Base: Total = 381) 6
and ETFs are expected to make up an even bigger portion of core holdings in the future Expectations for product allocation changes in next five years Increase Stay the same Decrease ETFs 69% 22% 9% Mutual Funds 53% 31% 16% Individual Stocks 52% 32% 16% Individual Bonds 46% 36% 18% Q3. On average, how do you expect the product allocation of your clients core holdings to change in the next 5 years, if at all? (Base: Total = 381) 7
Advisors say their clients core holdings are evenly allocated between active and passive strategies Average percent of clients core holdings allocated to Passive strategies 49% 51% Active strategies Q4. On average, what percent of your clients core holdings are currently allocated to? (Base: Total = 381) 8
Advisors say that economic and market events impact how much of a portfolio should be allocated to core holdings How advisors expect to change core allocations in reaction to key events Would allocate more No impact on allocation Would allocate less Tax reform 54% 23% 23% Rise in federal fund interest rate 51% 24% 25% Market volatility 48% 22% 30% Economic recession 44% 19% 37% Midterm elections 41% 38% 21% Trade war escalation 40% 27% 33% Q9. Recognizing that this will depend on the risk tolerance and investment objectives of an individual client, broadly speaking how might each of the potential events below impact your allocation to core holdings in your clients portfolios? (Base: Total = 381) 9
Advisors believe a client s level of wealth impacts how much should be allocated to core holdings Does a client s level of wealth impact how much should be allocated to core holdings? Yes, I think mass affluent clients (between $100,000 - $249,999 in investable assets) should allocate more of their portfolio to core holdings than high net worth/ultra-high net worth clients Yes, I think high net worth/ultra-high net worth clients (over $1 million in investable assets) should allocate more of their portfolio to core holdings than mass affluent clients 46% 40% Yes (net) = 86% No, a client's level of wealth does not impact how much of their portfolio should be allocated to core holdings 14% Q10. Does a client s level of wealth impact how much of their portfolio should be allocated to core holdings? (Base: Total = 381) 10
Beyond the Core: ETFs on the Rise Advisor views on the total portfolio 11
Half of advisors say ETFs are already the primary investment type in client portfolios, and most expect ETF dominance to grow going forward Primary investment type in client portfolios Neither 7% Neither 7% Mutual funds 41% Today 52% ETFs 30% In the future 64% ETFs Mutual funds Q14. Which of the following is the primary investment type in your clients portfolios today? Q15. Which of the following do you see as being the primary investment type in your clients portfolios in the future? (Base: Total = 381) 12
Use of all-etf and all-mutual fund portfolios is already common and poised to rise in the coming years Would consider placing a client s entire portfolio into ETFs only/mutual funds only 50% 48% Already do this for some clients 19% 22% 9% 7% 22% 23% Yes, in the next year Yes, in the next 2-5 years No ETFs only Mutual funds only Q13. Assuming it fits their investment objectives/risk tolerance, would you consider placing a client s entire investment portfolio (excluding cash holdings) in the following investment types? This means the portfolio would not include any individual stocks or bonds. (Base: Total = 381) 13
Millennial and female advisors are particularly likely to have clients in all-etf and all-mutual fund portfolios Would consider placing a client s entire portfolio into ETFs only/mutual funds only By generation By gender Millennials (age 25-37) Gen X (age 38-53) Boomers (age 54-72) Male Female ETFs only Already do this for some clients 60% 55% 43% 50% 57% Yes, in the next year 26% 16% 22% 21% 22% Yes, in the next 2-5 years 10% 9% 11% 10% 11% No 4% 20% 24% 19% 10% Mutual funds only Already do this for some clients 61% 49% 44% 49% 55% Yes, in the next year 25% 21% 26% 24% 24% Yes, in the next 2-5 years 9% 9% 7% 7% 11% No 5% 21% 23% 20% 10% Q13. Assuming it fits their investment objectives/risk tolerance, would you consider placing a client s entire investment portfolio (excluding cash holdings) in the following investment types? This means the portfolio would not include any individual stocks or bonds. (Base: Total = 381) 14
Focus On: Cost and Access Advisor views on fund costs and minimums 15
Most advisors say low investment minimums are very important when selecting a mutual fund Low or no investment minimums are a very important consideration when selecting a mutual fund for my client 58% or 42% Low or no investment minimums are not an important consideration when selecting a mutual fund for my client I believe that mutual funds should have multiple share classes, accessible at different asset levels 56% or 44% I believe mutual funds should have a single share class, accessible to all Mutual funds and ETFs that have the same investment objective/ strategy and track the same index should have the same operating expense ratio (OER) 50% or 50% Mutual funds and ETFs that have the same investment objective/strategy and track the same index do not necessarily need to have the same operating expense ratio (OER) Q16. When it comes to mutual funds, please select the statements that best describe your views. (Base: Total = 381) 16
Total cost tends to be the most important consideration when choosing any index fund, whether it is a mutual fund or ETF Importance when choosing an index fund Total cost (commissions, expense ratio, bid/ask spread) 66% 30% 3% 1% How well it tracks to its index 63% 31% 5% 1% Reputation of the fund provider 61% 34% 4% 1% Access/exposure to a specific part of the market 59% 35% 5% 1% Low expense ratio 58% 35% 6% 1% Historical returns 58% 34% 7% 1% Liquidity/trading volume 54% 39% 6% 1% Total assets 51% 41% 7% 1% Morningstar rating 45% 43% 11% 1% Low or no investment minimum (mutual funds only) 44% 46% 10% 0% The brand name of the fund provider 43% 47% 9% 1% Extremely important Somewhat important Not at all important Don't know Q20. When choosing an index fund, how important to you is each of the following? (Base: Total = 381) 17
The ability to trade ETFs without commissions or other brokerage firm fees is important to advisors Importance of ability to trade ETFs without commissions or fees Most Important / Very Important (Net) = 70% Not important at all=0% 36% 34% 27% 3% Most important I would move my account to a brokerage firm that offers commission-free ETFs Very important I only invest in commission-free ETFs at my brokerage firm Somewhat important It is not the only factor I consider in my buying decision Not as important as other factors Q18. How important is the ability to trade ETFs without commissions or other brokerage firm fees? (Base: Total = 381) 18
Focus On: Fund Choices How advisors choose funds and asset managers 19
When deciding between two funds with the same investment objective and price, few advisors focus on brand name Top criteria advisors use to decide between funds with the same investment objective and price Performance history 58% Track record Asset manager provides great portfolio construction education and guidance Asset manager provides great education for my clients 37% 33% 49% Client requests it 31% Customer service of asset manager 30% Pre-existing established relationship with asset manager 19% Brand name 16% Tracking error 10% Q11. What are the top 3 criteria you would use to decide between two funds that have the same investment objective and price? Assume you have already met the clients investment objectives and risk tolerance. (Base: Total = 381) 20
Advisors look for guidance from asset management firms on portfolio allocation and prefer firms offering core funds clients can understand Phrase best describing your views I seek guidance from asset management firms on portfolio construction/allocation 69% or 31% I do not seek guidance from asset management firms on portfolio construction/allocation I prefer to work with asset management firms/ product issuers that make core funds my clients can understand 59% or 41% I prefer to work with asset management firms/product issuers that make exotic funds I need to explain to my clients I would like more education on how to best use ETFs in a portfolio 57% or 43% I do not need more education on how to best use ETFs in a portfolio I think too many asset management firms/product issuers over-complicate their funds to rationalize higher costs 56% or 44% I think too many asset management firms /product issuers make their funds too plain vanilla An innovative product lineup is most important to me when choosing a product suite from an asset manager 50% or 50% A simple, straightforward product lineup is most important to me when choosing a product suite from an asset manager Every investor/advisor/institution should have same access to same lowest cost funds, regardless of how much they have to invest 50% or 50% Institutions/advisors/investors with more assets should have special access to lower operating expense ratios (OERs) Q12. Please select which of the following statements best describes you. Note: respondents were asked to choose one of two statements. (Base: Total = 381) 21
Trust and performance are most important to advisors when considering an asset manager Most important factors when considering an asset manager Trust 80% 17% 3% Performance 78% 21% 1% Provides market expertise 72% 25% 3% Reputation 71% 27% 2% Offers a broad range of funds 69% 28% 3% Service 67% 30% 3% Provides guidance on portfolio construction 62% 32% 6% Availability of low/no minimum options for mutual funds 62% 35% 3% Diversity of portfolio management team 62% 33% 5% Offers low-cost funds 60% 36% 4% Infrequency of fund closure 58% 36% 6% Provides practice management advice 58% 38% 4% Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Q28. How important are each of the following when considering an asset manager? (Base: Total = 381) 22
Focus On: Smart Beta How advisors view smart beta strategies 23
Three in five advisors say they invest in smart beta strategies Investment in smart beta strategies Do not currently invest in smart beta strategies 40% 60% Currently invest in smart beta strategies Q21. Do you currently invest in any smart beta strategies? (Smart beta strategies also known as strategic beta strategies seek a different kind of market exposure by screening and weighting securities based on factors other than market capitalization.) (Base: Total = 381) 24
For advisors who already invest in smart beta strategies, growth, quality, value and fundamental strategies are most popular Investments in smart beta strategies Among those who invest in smart beta strategies Currently Invest in Plan to Invest in Currently / Plan to invest in (net) Growth 68% 21% 89% Quality 62% 24% 86% Value 55% 24% 79% Fundamental 55% 28% 83% Dividend 53% 29% 82% Multi-factor 48% 32% 80% Low volatility 48% 37% 85% Equal Weight 45% 36% 81% Smart beta fixed income 45% 34% 79% Momentum 41% 37% 78% Other 13% 14% 27% Q23. Which type of smart beta strategies do you currently invest in, or plan to invest in, in the near future? (Base: Currently invest in smart beta strategies = 251) 25
Of those invested in smart beta, nearly three quarters say they will increase client investments in the strategies in the next year Expect to do in the next year Among those who invest in smart beta strategies Don t know 1% Keep client investments in smart beta products the same 25% 74% Increase client investments in smart beta products No advisors expect to decrease client investments in smart beta strategies Q24. In the next year, which one do you expect to do, if any? (Base: Currently invest in smart beta strategies = 251) 26
Majority of advisors who invest in smart beta strategies see them as a complement to market cap-weighted ETFs and mutual funds View of smart beta ETFs and mutual funds Among those who invest in smart beta strategies 1% Neither/Don t know Smart beta ETFs and mutual funds are a replacement for market capweighted ETFs and mutual funds 34% 65% Smart beta ETFs and mutual funds are a complement to market cap-weighted ETFs and mutual funds Q22. Please select the statement that best describes your views. (Base: Currently invest in smart beta strategies Total = 251) 27
Focus On: Behavioral Finance Advisors on behavioral missteps 28
Behavioral missteps are common among clients; advisors say availability, confirmation bias and loss aversion are most prevalent Behavioral mistakes made by advisors clients Availability - Using the most available information to make decisions without doing analysis Confirmation Bias - Seeking information that supports investment decisions while ignoring negative information Loss aversion - emotional fear of losing assets that prevent them from seeing the opportunities I have seen clients do this 76% 75% 72% I have not seen clients do this 24% 25% 28% Anchoring - Making decisions based on an initial, default ''anchor'' 70% 30% Herding - Favoring popular investments/vehicles to minimize future regret 70% 30% Overconfidence - Thinking that they have the magic touch and cannot do anything wrong 70% 30% Regret- Lack of action in an effort to avoid unfavorable outcomes 67% 33% Q26. Which of these behavioral finance mistakes do you see among your clients? (Base: Total = 381) 29
Millennial advisors are more likely than other generations to see Herding as a misstep among their clients Advisors who say they have seen clients make the mistake of herding 79% 66% 65% Millennial advisors Gen X advisors Boomer advisors Q26. Which of these behavioral finance mistakes do you see among your clients? (Base: Total = 381) 30
Independent Advisor Profile 31
Independent Advisor Profile Gender Total Advisors (n=381) Male 87% Female 13% Age Millennials 19% Generation X 43% Boomers 34% Matures 4% Mean age Region 48 years old Northeast 26% Midwest 15% South 41% West 18% Type of advice engaged in Provide investment advice to individual clients 86% Provide financial planning advice 79% Manage clients' investment assets 75% Last time bought or sold ETFs Past month 71% Past 3 months 11% Past 6 months 7% Past year 2% Past 2 years 2% More than 2 years ago 7% Assets under management Total Advisors (n=381) $50 million to less than $150 million 24% $150 million to less than $250 million 16% $250 million to less than $500 million 20% $500 million to less than $750 million 20% $750 million to less than $1 billion 13% $1 billion or more 7% Mean (In Million) $440.4 Median (In Million) $375 Average size of investable assets held by clients Less than $250,000 22% $250,000 to less than $500,000 (375) 17% $500,000 to less than $1 million 28% $1 million to less than $2.5 million (1750) 13% $2.5 million or more 19% Prefer not to say 1% Mean (In Thousand) $1077.8 Median (In Thousand) $625 Number of years worked as investment advisor Fewer than 5 years 2% 5-9 years 21% 10-14 years 34% 15-24 years 27% 25-34 years 13% 35 years or more 3% Mean Median 15.7 years 12 years 32
Disclosures Investment returns will fluctuate and are subject to market volatility, so that an investor s shares, when redeemed or sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Unlike mutual funds, shares of ETFs are not individually redeemable directly with the ETF. Shares of ETFs are bought and sold at market price, which may be higher or lower than the net asset value (NAV). There can be no assurance that the Smart Beta methodologies will achieve their desired outcomes. Each investing strategy brings its own set of unique risks and benefits. Please consult your financial advisor to structure a plan best suited to your individual situation. 2018 & Co., Inc. (Member SIPC) All rights reserved. (1018-87BM)