Structuring Employee Severance Arrangements: Revisiting Code Section 409A and its Impact on Deferred Compensation

Similar documents
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Brian E. Hammell, Esq., Sullivan & Worcester, Boston

Severance Plans and ERISA Compliance: Limiting Liability in Design and Implementation of Severance Arrangements

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Elizabeth A. Gartland, Esq., Fenwick & West, San Francisco

Executive Compensation: Tax and Other Considerations for Restricted Stock Awards

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Marshall Mort, Esq., Fenwick & West, Mountain View, Calif.

QDRO Drafting Boot Camp: Preparing QDROs for 401(k)s and Similar Defined Contribution Plans

Commercial Lease Negotiations: Property and Liability Insurance, Proof of Coverage, AI and Loss Payee Issues

401(k) Plan Nondiscrimination Testing: Guidance for Employee Benefits Counsel

Structuring Equity Compensation for Partnerships and LLCs Navigating Capital and Profits Interests Plus Section 409A and Tax Consequences

Completion Guaranties in Construction Lending: Key Provisions for Lenders and Guarantors

Mastering New IRC 457(f) Plan Guidance for ERISA Counsel: Structuring Deferred Comp Plans for Nonprofit Entities

Universal Health Services v. Escobar: Avoiding Implied Certification Liability Under FCA

Structuring Equity Compensation for Partnerships and LLCs Navigating Capital and Profits Interests Plus Section 409A and Tax Consequences

ERISA Pre-Approved and Customized Benefit Plans: Overhauled IRS Procedures and Determination Letter Process

Tax Strategies for Real Estate LLC and LP Agreements: Capital Commitments, Tax Allocations, Distributions, and More

New Section 199A: Structuring Real Estate Transactions to Take Advantage of the Qualified Business Income Deduction

Asset Sale vs. Stock Sale: Tax Considerations, Advanced Drafting and Structuring Techniques for Tax Counsel

Survivor Benefit Plans and Military Divorce: Defending Against or Claiming Former-Spouse SBP Coverage

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Estate Planning and Tax Reform: Wealth Transfer Structures Under the New Tax Law

Minority Investors in LLCs: Contractual Limitations, Waivers of Fiduciary Duties, Other Key Provisions

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Fraudulent Conveyance Exposure for Intercorporate Guaranties, Integrated Transactions and Designated-Use Loans

Clearing Title for Defects Due to Mortgage-Related Issues, Legal Description Errors, and Foreclosure

Tax Allocation in Pass-Through Entities

Impact of Tax Reform on ABLE Accounts and Special Needs Trusts: Guidance for Elder Law Attorneys

Creatively Completing The Capital Stack: Real Estate GP Private Equity Funds

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Matthew B. Grunert, Partner, Andrews Kurth Kenyon, Houston

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

ERISA Retirement Plan Investment Management Agreements: Guidance for Plan Sponsors to Minimize Risks

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Scott J. Bakal, Partner, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg, Chicago Robert C. Stevenson, Attorney, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, Washington, D.C.

Investment Adviser Advertising Rule: New SEC Guidance and Best Practices for Compliance

ERISA Compliance and Monitoring 401(k) Investments: Safe Harbor Rules and Appointing Advisers

Springing the Delaware Tax Trap: Drafting Limited Powers of Appointment to Increase Asset Income Tax Basis

Section 704, Targeted Allocations, and the Distribution Waterfall: Overcoming Challenges Absent IRS Guidance

Property Management and Leasing Agreements: Key Provisions for Multi-Family, Office, Retail and Industrial Properties

Private Investment Funds and Tax Reform

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Scott D. Brooks, Partner, Cox Castle & Nicholson, San Francisco

Allocating Operating Expenses in Commercial Real Estate Leases: Negotiating Strategies for Landlords and Tenants

Allocating Risk in Real Estate Leases: Contractual Indemnities, Additional Insured Endorsements and Waivers of Subrogation

Protecting Business Assets From Creditors in Litigation: Strategic Choice of Entities, Avoiding Fraudulent Transfers

Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A

Key Commercial Lease Provisions and SNDAs That Concern Lenders in Mortgage and Leasehold Financing

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Using Partnership Flips to Finance Renewable Energy Projects: Evaluating Tax Risks, Navigating IRS Safe Harbors

M&A Indemnification Deal Terms: 2017 Survey Results

Using Inverted Leases to Finance Renewable Energy Projects

Section 409A and Severance Arrangements

Construction OCIP/CCIP Insurance Programs: Potential Coverage Gaps and Other Coverage Pitfalls

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Opinion Letters in Commercial Real Estate Best Practices to Minimize Risk When Crafting Third Party Opinions on Loans and Acquisitions

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Corporate Governance of Subsidiaries: Board Roles and Responsibilities, Interplay With Parent Board, Liability Risks

Tax Challenges With Private Equity Management Fee Waivers Given Newly Heightened IRS Scrutiny

Financing Multi-Family Housing: Structuring the Low Income House Tax Credit and Tax-Exempt Bonds Documenting Transactions for Investors and Developers

Private Equity Waterfall and Carried Interest Provisions: Economic and Tax Implications for Investors and Sponsors

Insurance Coverage for Statutory and Liquidated Damages and Attorney Fees: Policyholder and Insurer Perspectives

Estate Planning With Grantor Trusts: Leveraging GRATs and IDGTs to Minimize Taxes, Preserve and Transfer Assets

Construction Builder's Risk and CGL Insurance: Scope of Coverage, Covered Losses, Exclusions, AI Endorsements

Drafting Shareholder Agreements for Private Equity M&A Deals

Foley & Lardner LLP. May 13, :00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. EST

Using Partnership Flips to Finance Renewable Energy Projects: Evaluating Tax Risks, Navigating IRS Safe Harbors

Fiduciary Compliance in ESOP Transactions: Recent DOL Settlement Agreements

for Landlords and Tenants Negotiating Insurance, Indemnity and Mutual Waiver of Subrogation Provisions

Presenting a 90-minute encore presentation featuring live Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: James O. Lang, Shareholder, Greenberg Traurig, Tampa, Fla.

Exercising Setoff and Recoupment Rights in Bankruptcy

UCC Article 9 Blanket Asset Lien Exclusions and Purchase Money Security Interests

Best Efforts and Commercially Reasonable Efforts in M&A Agreements: Drafting and Interpretation Challenges

Resolving Medicare and Medicaid Liens in Personal Injury Cases Negotiating Healthcare Liens or Claims for Reimbursement, Maximizing Settlement Awards

Foreign Investment in U.S. Real Estate: Impact of Tax Reform

Leveraging Earnings-Stripping Regs for Foreign Investments: Maximizing Tax Savings, Minimizing IRS Scrutiny

Reporting Costs of Health Insurance on Employee W-2s: New Requirements

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Dean C. Berry, Partner, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft, New York

Auto Injury Claim Recovery: Maximizing Pain and Suffering, Loss of Future Earning Capacity Damages

Drafting Income-Only Trusts for Medicaid Eligibility and Tax Planning

ERISA Considerations in Structuring Credit Facilities with Private Investment Funds

Structuring Commercial Loan Term Sheets, Proposals and Commitment Letters: Key Terms for Lenders and Borrowers

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

SECTION 409A: A NIGHTMARE OF COMPLEXITY

Mezzanine Lending: Overcoming Lender Risks to Protect ROI

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Distressed Loan Workouts: How Equity Cure Rights Work, Negotiating Loan Restructuring and Forbearance Agreements

UCC Article 9 Blanket Asset Lien Exclusions and Purchase Money Security Interests

Interest Rate Hedges in Real Estate Finance: Placing Swaps, Caps, and Collars on Floating Rate Loans

Tax Challenges for NPO Counsel: Excess Benefit Transactions for Executive Comp and Other Financial Dealings

Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Claims: Leveraging Insurance Stacking

Construction Subcontractor Default Insurance: A Viable Alternative to Performance Bonds?

30(b)(6) Depositions in Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Litigation Preparing and Responding to Notices of Corporate Representative Depositions

Negotiating Reserve Provisions in Real Estate Loan Transactions

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

IP Agreements: Structuring Indemnification and Limitation of Liability Provisions to Allocate Infringement Risk

Asset Spend-Down for Medicaid Qualification Navigating the Complexities of Classifying Assets, Individuals vs. Married Couples, and Appeals Process

High Volatility Commercial Real Estate Loans: Guidance for Developers and Lenders on HVCRE Rules and Loan Covenants

401(k) Plan Audit Preparation Strategies Navigating IRS and DOL Standards, Taking Corrective Actions and Minimizing Risks of Penalties

IP Agreements: Structuring Indemnification and Limitation of Liability Provisions to Allocate Infringement Risk

Transcription:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Employee Severance Arrangements: Revisiting Code Section 409A and its Impact on Deferred Compensation TUESDAY, JULY 26, 2016 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain 10am Pacific Today s faculty features: Carrie Byrnes, Partner, Michael Best & Friedrich, Chicago Katherine A. Heptig, Partner, Rivkin Radler, Uniondale, N.Y. Benjamin D. Panter, Member, McDonald Hopkins, Chicago The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.

Tips for Optimal Quality FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-258-2056 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar. A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you email that you will receive immediately following the program. For additional information about continuing education, call us at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35.

Program Materials FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: Click on the ^ symbol next to Conference Materials in the middle of the lefthand column on your screen. Click on the tab labeled Handouts that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program. Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.

Strafford Employee Severance Agreements and Section 409A Carrie Byrnes Michael Best & Friedrich cebyrnes@michaelbest.com Katherine Heptig Rivkin Radler kate.heptig@rivkin.com Benjamin Panter McDonald Hopkins bpanter@mcdonaldhopkins.com

Introduction What is Section 409A? Congress intends to address Enron and WorldCom Enron provided the IRS with the political capital necessary to regulate deferred compensation IRS goes overboard, interpreting 409A as broad mandate to address deferred compensation regulation, with a series of regulations and other guidance from the IRS continuing for years 6 6

Why Do You Care? Employee penalties are very harsh Employers have a reporting and withholding obligation Employers often feel a moral obligation to gross employees up Employer could have contractual gross up obligation 7 7

Code Section 409A Penalties Where did the dollar go? 8 8

Your Dollar 1.00 Less Federal Income Tax at 35%.35 Remaining Dollar.65 9 9

Your Dollar.65 Less State Income Tax at 6%.06 Remaining Dollar.59 10 10

Your Dollar.59 Less 409A Tax at 20%.20 Remaining Dollar.39 11 11

Your Dollar.39 Less 409A Interest Penalty at 8%.05 Remaining Dollar.34 12 12

Your Dollar.34 Less State Imposed Tax at up to 20%*.20 Remaining Dollar.14 *CA had adopted a 20% tax which was reduced to 5% in 2013; some other states considered/are considering adopting a parallel tax. 13 13

Your Dollar.14 Less FICA Tax at 7.65%.08 Remaining Dollar.06 14 14

The Post 409A Dollar 15 15

Key Components Of 409A The basic rules are deceptively straightforward Code Section 409A is two pages Final regulations are 400 pages and then there are notices Three basic rules Deferral election rules regulate the timing of deferrals Distribution rules define permissible distribution forms and events Modification and amendment rules define circumstances under which changes are permissible 16 16

IRS Activity Plans have been required to be in documentary and operational compliance since January 1, 2009 Increased audit activity since 2009 Limited correction program - design and operational issues Correction often involves disclosure to the IRS by both the employer and employee Correction often involves penalties for both the employer and employee Ability to correct can expire. Identify and correct issues as soon as possible Not available if under audit 17 17

IRS Activity May 2014 IRS announced first step of an IRS compliance initiative project Initial audit of no more than 50 companies The companies chosen for audit were previously identified for audit on employment tax issues Focus will be primarily on initial deferral elections, subsequent deferral elections and payouts (including compliance with the six-month delay rule) Audits not be limited to traditional deferral programs, but will include review of all nonqualified plans 18 18

Severance Agreements: Drafting Considerations Isn t it enough to have a catch-all 409A provision at the end of an severance agreement? No. IRS disregards 409A savings clauses 409A is incredibly complex No single catch-all template works for all agreements in all situations Each agreement requires individual attention With some drafting forethought, many agreements can be drafted to avoid many of 409A s most troublesome requirements 19 19

Corrections Most of what we discuss today is correctable under IRS correction guidelines two main correction programs: Notice 2008-113 (operational failures) Notice 2010-6 (documentary failures) Correcting often requires employer and employee filings with the IRS No announced intention to afford IRS review/assurance of adequacy of correction While employer are often reluctant to do corrective filings out of red flag concerns, we often still urge formal correction Early identification and correction can equate to more protection Again, once under audit, correction programs are unavailable 20 20

Permissible Payment Events Amounts that are considered deferred compensation may only be distributed on a permissible payment event On a fixed date or pursuant to a fixed schedule (not a specified event) Separation from service Change in control (as defined in 409A) Unforeseeable emergency (as defined in 409A) Disability (as defined in 409A) Death 21 21

When does a separation from service occur? Separation from service = termination of employment? Presumption of separation If services permanently decrease to 20% or less of average services performed over immediately preceding 36-month period, presumed to be a separation If 50% or more, presumed to be no separation In between 20%-50% -- no presumption Plan may adopt its own rule by setting a level of services greater than 20% but less than 50% of the average level of services provided over preceding 36 months that will trigger a separation from service 22 22

409A Common Misconceptions 1. I thought 409A only applied to public companies. All of the 409A rules apply to all companies, but there is one rule (six-month delay required for certain separation payments to specified employees ) that only applies to public companies. 2. 409A only affects executives, right? Wrong. If there is nonqualified deferred compensation, 409A applies. 3. Ok, so it only applies to employees? Nope. Directors and other independent contractors are also subject to 409A. 4. But 409A doesn t apply to partnerships or LLCs, right? Wrong. 409A applies to every service recipient, regardless of its form. While the final regulations do not address partnership equity compensation, and the preamble indicates that until guidance is issued, one can rely on Notice 2005-1, for purposes of severance, the form of the company is irrelevant for 409A purposes. 23 23

409A Common Misconceptions (Cont d) 5. Ok, ok, but really, I hear 409A allows payments to be changed in connection with a change in control anyway. Maybe but not necessarily. There are significant restrictions on how a payment that is subject to 409A can be modified. It is true that there is some ability to terminate and liquidate plans in connection with a change in control but this exception to acceleration of nonqualified compensation requires compliance with its own set of requirements, including parameters around payment timing, the requirement that other similar plans also be terminated and restrictions of entering into new plans of a similar type following the transaction. 6. Since the Company is the party drafting these agreements, it must be the case that the Company is the party who will have to pay penalties for violations, right? Sadly, no. Other than penalties for failing to withhold and report income properly, the majority of the consequences fall on the service provider, but he/she will likely look to the Company to be made whole. 24 24

409A Decision Tree 1. Is the severance payment nonqualified deferred compensation? If No Not subject to 409A If Yes Continue to 2. below. 2. Does the severance payment comply with 409A? If Yes Good job! If No Continue to 3. below. 3. Is it exempt from 409A? Examples: Short term deferrals Separation pay exception Certain health benefits Certain Reimbursements Limited payments Legal settlements Window programs Collectively bargains separation pay plans Foreign plans 25 25

What is Deferred Compensation? Deferral of compensation exists only if under the relevant facts and circumstances participant has a legally binding right during a taxable year to compensation that is or may be payable in a later tax year. Simple statement incredibly broad application Don t confuse legally binding right with vested. One can have a legally binding (i.e., contractual) right to compensation that will only be payable to the extent a condition is satisfied (i.e., to the extent it vests). The legally binding right is what triggers a 409A analysis. Example of a legally binding right: The employee will be entitled to $X if performance targets XYZ are met. Example of no legally binding right: The Board may, in its discretion, provide Employee with $X upon the satisfaction of XYZ. Discretionary vs. Objective Formula 26 26

Comply or Be Exempt There are several ways to exclude arrangements: Per se exclusions - 401(k); other qualified plans; certain foreign plans Factual exclusions - short-term deferrals; separation pay exemption; restricted property Definitional exclusions - no legally binding right 27 27

How to Comply If a service provider has a legally binding right to deferred compensation that does not fit within one of the stated exemptions from 409A, that amount may only be payable upon: A fixed date or pursuant to a fixed schedule (not a specified event) Separation from service Change in control (as defined in 409A) Unforeseeable emergency (as defined in 409A) Disability (as defined in 409A) Death 28 28

Compliant Severance Severance is typically paid in connection with a separation from service so what is the issue? 1. What does it mean to pay severance upon a separation from service? An amount is payable on a permissible 409A trigger if the plan provides the date of the event is the payment date, or specifies another payment date that is objectively determinable and nondiscretionary at the time the event occurs. A plan may also provide that a payment is to be made during a designated period objectively determinable and nondiscretionary at the time the payment event occurs, but only if the designated period both begins and ends within one taxable year of the service provider or the designated period is not more than 90 days and the service provider does not have a right to designate the taxable year of payment. 29 29

Compliant Severance (Cont d) 2. Has there actually been a separation from service? Safe harbor Consulting 3. Is the service provider a specified employee subject to a six (6)-month delay? 4. Is the severance payment tied to the execution of a release? 30 30

IRC 409A Severance Some forms of severance are not deemed NQDC for purposes of 409A Exemptions: Short term deferrals Two times exception Certain health benefits Certain Reimbursements Limited payments Legal settlements Window programs Collectively bargains separation pay plans Foreign plans 31 31

IRC 409A Severance When dealing with severance need to think through: Was the severance subject to a Substantial Risk of Forfeiture? Was the termination of employment a Separation from Service? Was the termination an Involuntary Separation? Is the individual a Specified Employee? 32 32

IRC 409A Severance If no right to payment upon separation from service then parties have flexibility to structure time and form of payment Note that severance cannot be a substitute for forfeited NQDC Be careful of payments required to be settled on a separation from service RSUs settled on separation from service Non-exempt stock options (FMV) Traditional NQDC If amounts should be settled, but are not settled, then likely 409A problems 33 33

IRC 409A Substantial Risk of Forfeiture Payments made within 2 ½ months after the end of the year in which the severance vests are exempt In most cases, payments made by March 15 of the year after an involuntary termination of employment will be exempt This includes payments made in a lump sum or in installments if the plan provides that each payment is a separate payment (stacking of exemptions) 34 34

IRC 409A Separation Pay Exemption The lesser of the following can be treated as not NQDC: Two times 401(a)(17) limit for the year of termination This is the amount that can be recognized for qualified pension plans $265,000 for 2016 Two times the annualized compensation based upon the annual rate for services in the preceding taxable year Must be paid by the last day of the second taxable year following the taxable year of separation 35 35

IRC 409A Separation Pay Exemption Must be paid only on an involuntary separation from service Termination without Cause Termination with Good Reason where the definition of Good Reason is a good 409A definition Amounts cannot be payable for any other reason, even if the termination is actually an involuntary termination 36 36

IRC 409A Impact of Good Reason Goes to substantial risk of forfeiture Goes to only being paid on involuntary separation Regulations provide for safe harbor definition; otherwise facts and circumstances determination Material diminution in base compensation Material diminution in authority, duties or responsibilities Material diminution in authority, duties or responsibilities of supervisor Material diminution in the budget over which authority is retained Material change in geographic location Any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach of the service agreement Notice within 90 days; at least 30 days to cure, separation within 2 years of event 37 37

IRC 409A Impact of Good Reason Short term deferral needs to be based on substantial risk of forfeiture Bad Good Reason means no SRF Two times exception depends on being payable only on involuntary separation Bad Good Reason termination means not involuntary separation Note: There is nothing wrong with having a bad Good Reason definition it just means that the payments must be structured to comply with 409A 38 38

IRC 409A Specified Employees If a public company Specified Employee is involved, payments that would otherwise be due: during the first 6 months after separation need to be delayed until the earlier of the end of such 6-month period and death 39 39

IRC 409A Specified Employees Specified employees generally are employees who are 1. officers with annual compensation greater than $170,000 (for 2016), 2. 5% owners, or 3. 1% owners with annual compensation over $150,000 Generally, no more than 50 people will be specified employees 40 40

IRC 409A Specified Employees Identification of specified employees is based on the 12- month period ending on December 31 (or another identification date chosen by the corporation) A persons who is a specified employee during that 12- month period is considered a specified employee for the 12- month period commencing on the next April 1 (or sooner, if the plan specifies) 41 41

IRC 409A Specified Employees To meet the six-month delay requirement, a plan may provide that: i. any amount payable pursuant to a separation of service due within the six-month period is delayed until the end of the six-month period, or ii. iii. each scheduled payment that becomes payable pursuant to a separation from service is delayed six months, or a combination of the foregoing 42 42

Multiple Forms of Payment You are drafting an agreement for a longserving CEO Agreement calls for two years severance (salary continuation) upon voluntary termination CEO wants a lump-sum payment upon involuntary termination Reasonable? Yes. 409A compliant? 43 43

Multiple Forms of Payment Not 409A compliant 409A generally permits only one form of payment following triggering event, like separation from service In other words, all times and forms of payment on account of a type of distribution event must be the same (a.k.a.. the anti-toggling rule) A separate toggle permitted for event occurring prior to specified date (or years of service for termination). Example retirement toggle An additional toggle for terminations within two years following a 409A change in control 44 44

Non-Separation from Service Toggle Example A plan may provide that a service provider will receive a lump sum payment of the service provider s entire benefit under the plan on the first day of the month following a change in control event that occurs before the service provider attains age 55, but will receive five substantially equal annual payments commencing on the first day of the month following a change in control event that occurs on or after the service provider s attainment of age 55 The toggle is the service provider s age in relation to age 55 at the time of the change in control event The plan cannot provide for another payment pattern based on another toggle, such as a change in control event that occurs on or after service provider s attainment of age 65 45 45

Separation from Service Toggle Rules Special rules apply to a plan that provides for payment upon separation from service A different time and form of payment may be designated with respect to a separation from service under each of the following conditions: A separation from service during a limited period of time not to exceed two years following a change in control event A separation from service before or after a specified date, including attainment of a specified age, or a separation from service before or after a combination of a specified date and completion of a specified number of years of service, for example, attaining age 55 and completing ten years of service Any other separation from service 46 46

Multiple Forms of Payment Drafting Tip: Some latitude to vary payment forms for exempt arrangements Exempting arrangements takes up-front work 47 47

Medical Continuation After COBRA Your client wants to give an executive two years of severance in an agreement Executive advocates for continued coverage under medical plan for two year period with employer paid premiums Setting aside the tax and ACA issues, surely there can t be a 409A issue... 48 48

Medical Continuation After COBRA There are potential 409A issues Taxable medical premiums after the COBRA period are subject to 409A COBRA period (for separation) is generally 18 months Premiums are often taxable to employee for self-insured medical plans under nondiscrimination requirements 49 49

Medical Continuation After COBRA Medical premiums after the COBRA period should be structured to meet the reimbursement provisions that are otherwise applicable to taxable reimbursements under 409A Several requirements must be met, including that the amount of expenses eligible for reimbursement in a calendar year can t affect amount eligible in another calendar year In addition to 409A concerns: For self-insured plans, be wary of nondiscrimination rules For insured plans, health reform nondiscrimination rules tolled. for now 50 50

Acceleration of Vesting Equity-based grants (options, SARs and restricted stock) are, in most cases, exempt from 409A (if SR stock, no deferral feature and granted at price at least = to FMV) RSUs will be subject to 409A unless structed to meet an exemption The acceleration of vesting of an equity grant generally will not cause Section 409A to apply to that award This is the rule regardless of whether the acceleration is pursuant to a provision contained in the option at the time of grant and when the acceleration is approved at a later date (e.g., in connection with a change in control) In the case of a 409A-compliant stock option, the acceleration of vesting generally cannot result in an acceleration of the date of payment (i.e., exercise) of the option 51 51

409A and Releases TWO IMPORTANT POINTS: 1. A requirement that an employee sign a release in order to receive a benefit does not create a substantial risk of forfeiture; this means that payments that are otherwise vested but subject to the execution and delivery of a release should not be treated as unvested. Important for purposes of a short-term deferral analysis. 52 52

409A and Releases (Cont d) 2. Severance that is subject to 409A can be conditioned upon the receipt of a release but the timing of the payment cannot be based upon when the employee provides the release. Caution should be taken when drafting provisions for releases to ensure that the payment timing with respect to the provision of the release complies with 409A. Agreement must specify window for execution of release if severance commencement is contingent on such release; avoids service provider indirectly choosing tax year of payments. Must specify when severance begins and must be within objectively determinable year. Example of Noncompliant Language: The severance described in Section X shall be payable to Employee pursuant to the Company s normal payroll practices, commencing following Employee s delivery of an executed release of claims in favor of the Company. Example of Compliant Language: Payment of the severance described in Section X shall commence on the 60 th day following Employee s termination of employment, subject to a release of claims in favor of the Company, provided such release is executed, delivered and no longer subject to revocation, as applicable, within 60 days following such termination of employment. Alternative if delay is impracticable Severance shall commence within 90- day window following termination of employment, provided if such 90-day period straddles two calendar years, payment will commence during the second calendar year. 53 53

One size doesn t fit all Best Practices Whenever possible, try to fit within an exemption from 409A Check definitions against the Treas. Regs. Use safe harbors when possible Include separate installment language Beware of substitutions Consult an expert 54 54