Key Findings from Recent Joint Center Research Chris Herbert Real Estate Trends in Central Ohio January 26, 2017

Similar documents
Older Households : Projections and Implications for Housing A Growing Population

The State of the Nation s Housing Report 2017

SLUGGISH HOUSEHOLD GROWTH

Housing Recovery is Underway, But Not for Everyone

Hot Topics Affecting Housing Counseling. August 5, 2015

THE FINANCIAL SITUATIONS OF OLDER ADULTS

Demographic Drivers. Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University 11

DEMOGRAPHIC DRIVERS. Household growth is picking up pace. With more. than a million young foreign-born adults arriving

Demographic and Service Need Projections for the Aging Population:

The state of the nation s Housing 2013

SINGLE-FAMILY SLOWDOWN

May 17, Housing Sector Overview

The Impact of the Student Debt Crisis on Housing: Five Takeaways for the U.S. Real Estate Industry

From Crisis to Transition Demographic trends and American housing futures, with lessons from Texas

Comments on Forecasts

THE HOUSING MARKET REVIVAL

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

High LTV Lending Conference

AUGUST THE DUNNING REPORT: DIMENSIONS OF CORE HOUSING NEED IN CANADA Second Edition

Just the Facts, Ma am

Baby Boomers Accelerate Their Advance into Free-and-Clear Homeownership

Socio-economic Series Long-term household projections 2011 update

The Single-Family Outlook and its Impact on Multifamily

U.S. Residential. Mortgage Default. Performance Update. & Market Analysis

Rental Housing Imperatives and the Rise of Impact Capital

Update on Homeownership Wealth Trajectories Through the Housing Boom and Bust

Is Homeownership Still the American Dream?

JOINT CENTER FOR HOUSING STUDIES OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY

Weakness in the U.S. Housing Market Likely to Persist in 2008

Housing & Mortgage Outlook. Frank Nothaft Chief Economist May 22, 2018

Demographics. Housing Security in the Washington Region. Fairfax County, Fairfax City and Falls Church Cities

Demographics. Housing Security in the Washington Region. District of Columbia

Demographics. Housing Security in the Washington Region. Arlington County

Is the Commercial Real Estate Market Sustainable?

Las Vegas Housing-Market Conditions

Grow Your Business with Freddie Mac Home Possible Mortgages. Jenneese Worley, Account Executive, Nadja Vital, Affordable Manager

Rising Risks for the Housing Outlook

Canada's household balance sheets

The Office of Economic Policy HOUSING DASHBOARD. March 16, 2016

Millennials Have Begun to Play Homeownership Catch-Up

CHAPTER 3 POPULATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS

Supply-Side Factors and Housing Affordability

MBA Forecast Commentary Lynn Fisher, Mike Fratantoni, Joel Kan

Executive Summary. Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University 1

Florida: An Economic Overview

THE HOME BUYERS OF TOMORROW. September 8, 2016 Azad Amir-Ghassemi Research Analyst

HOUSING RECOVERY. 2017: Strongest Year for Housing Recovery. Charles C. Shinn, Jr., Ph.D. President, The Shinn Group / Builder Partnerships

Remodeling Industry Structure & Labor Trends

Expanding Homeownership Responsibly with Freddie Mac Home Possible

- US LEI & CEI - Yardeni Research, Inc.

Are Affordability Perceptions Reducing Household Mobility and Exacerbating the Housing Shortage?

MKT. Included in both the Russell 2000 & 3000 Indexes

Chapter 2 Executive Summary: More work past age 60 and later claims for Social Security benefits

Session Purpose and Focus. Why Bother? Approaches to understanding generational differences Generational research. Generational Marketing 2008

SOURCES OF INCOME FOR OLDER PERSONS IN 2003

JOINT CENTER FOR HOUSING STUDIES OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY

Las Vegas Housing-Market Conditions

The 2017 Housing & Economic Outlook

Rental housing affordability in Pennsylvania. Eileen Divringi Community Development Research Analyst Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

ABOUT ULI MN. VISION Thriving communities.

Florida: An Economic Overview

NORTH MINNEAPOLIS: INTRODUCTION

We re Not All The Same!

Expanding Homeownership Responsibly with Freddie Mac Home Possible. Nadja Vital MBA Central FL, Nov.8, 2017

LAEDC ECONOMIC FORECAST: CALIFORNIA AND LOS ANGELES

How Economic Security Changes during Retirement

Rethink The Future: The New Normal In Absence And Disability Management

Maintaining Equilibrium. Metro Denver 2017 Economic Forecast January 2017

The Health of Jefferson County: 2010 Demographic Update

Florida: An Economic Overview

State pensions. Extract from the July 2017 Fiscal risks report. Drivers of pensions spending: population ageing

Peterborough Sub-Regional Strategic Housing Market Assessment

Las Vegas Housing-Market Conditions

Housing & Mortgage Market Outlook

The Affordable Housing Crisis and the People it Affects. February America s Neighbors

Florida: An Economic Overview

2017 ECONOMIC OUTLOOK

2017 Regional Indicators Summary

35% 26% 57% 51% PROFILE. CIty of durham: Assets & opportunity ProfILe. key highlights. ABoUt the ProfILe ASSETS & OPPORTUNITY

31% 41% 11% 50% 18% PROFILE ASSETS & OPPORTUNITY PROFILE: SAN FRANCISCO KEY HIGHLIGHTS ABOUT THE PROFILE ASSETS & OPPORTUNITY

Population Change in the United States

(Table A-2). Again, this is the first time in recorded history. Plumbing the Depths. Promising Signs. The State of the Nation s Housing 2010

Las Vegas Housing-Market Conditions

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Florida: An Economic Overview

Millennials: Obstacles, Opinions & Opportunities

What Does Population Aging Mean for Growth and Investments? Paula Campbell Roberts

The Equifax Economic and Credit Markets Outlook

GRIM CONSTRUCTION AND SALES REPORTS

An Examination of Current Economic Conditions in the Nation and in Arkansas

S&P/Case Shiller index

Retirement Annuity and Employment-Based Pension Income, Among Individuals Aged 50 and Over: 2006

Florida: An Economic Overview

Social and Economic Determinants of Household Food Insecurity in the United States and Canada

ACTUARIAL REPORT 27 th. on the

Housing construction has been a driving force

2015 Year End Market Watch January December Sales Comparison

Economic and Housing Outlook

Poverty and Income Inequality in Scotland: 2013/14 A National Statistics publication for Scotland

The year began with increased market volatility. Why core apartments now?

Transcription:

Key Findings from Recent Joint Center Research Chris Herbert Real Estate Trends in Central Ohio January 26, 2017

Outlook for Household Growth Through 2035

Millennials and Baby Boomers Will Drive Coming Shifts in Population Age Structure and Household Growth 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Population (Millions) Under 5 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 2015 2025 2035 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90 and Source: US Census Bureau, 2014 Population Projections. 3

New JCHS Household Projections Factor in Changing Household Formation Rates 4

Latest Population Projections Boosted by Upward Adjustment in Immigration Levels 1.75 Net Annual International Immigration (Millions) 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2012 Projections 2014 Projections Historic Population Estimates Source: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates and 2014 Population Projections. 5

JCHS Projections for 2015-2025 Fall In Between Others Estimates, and are Consistent with Historic Growth Levels from the 1990s 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Household Growth (Millions of Households) 16.9 11.6 13.5 1970-1980 1980-1990 1990-2000 Decennial Census 11.2 11.0 2000-2010 2015-2025 Urban Instutute 13.6 2015-2025 JCHS 15.9 2015-2025 MBA* 11.5 2025-2035 JCHS Note: MBA Projections are for 2014-2024. Sources: Urban Institute (2015) Headship and Homeownership, What does the Future Hold; Mortgage Bankers Association (2015) Housing Demand: Demographics and the Numbers Behind the Coming Multi-Million Increase in Households; and JCHS tabulations of 2016 JCHS Household Projections. 6

Implications for Housing of a Rapidly Aging Population

By 2035 One in Three Households Will be 65+ and One in Ten Will be 80+ 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Households (Millions) Under 25 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-plus 2015 2025 2035 Source: 2016 JCHS Household Projections 8

Numbers of Owner and Renter Households Over 80 Will Double Projected Older Households by Age Group (Millions) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2015 2025 2035 2015 2025 2035 Owners Renters 65 69 70 74 75 79 80 and Over Source: 2016 JCHS Household and Tenure Projections. 9

Disability Prevalence Increases with Age 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Share of Population with Disabilities by Age Group (Percent) 50 54 55 59 60 64 65 69 70 74 75 79 80 and Type of Disability Over Mobility Self-Care Household Activity Notes: Mobility disability is defined as difficulty walking, getting in and out of bed, and climbing one flight of stairs; self-care disability as difficulty eating, dressing, toileting, and bathing; and household activity disability as difficulty with meal preparation, food shopping, using the telephone, taking medication, money management, housework, and driving. Source: JCHS tabulations of University of Michigan, 2014 Health and Retirement Survey. 10

The Number of Households With a Disability Will Increase Substantially by 2035 Number of Disabled Households Aged 65+ in 2014 and 2035, by Type of Disability (Millions) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2015 2025 2035 2015 2025 2035 2015 2025 2035 Mobility Disability Self-Care Disability Household Activity Disability Owner Households Renter Households Notes: Mobility disability includes difficulty walking, getting in and out of bed, and climbing one flight of stairs. Self-care disability includes difficulty eating, dressing, toileting, and bathing. Household activity disability includes meal preparation, food shopping, using the telephone, taking medication, money management, housework, and driving. Source: JCHS tabulations of 2014 Health and Retirement Survey data and JCHS Household and Tenure Projections. 11

Cost Burdens are Lowest among Owners without Mortgages Share of Households by Age Group (Percent) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 65 79 80 and Over 65 79 80 and Over 65 79 80 and Over Owners without Owners with Renters Mortgages Mortgages Severely Burdened Moderately Burdened Notes: Moderately / severely cost burdened is defined as paying 30 50% / over 50% of income on housing. Source: JCHS tabulations of US Census Bureau, 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates. 12

More Older Households are Carrying Higher Amounts of Mortgage Debt into Retirement 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Share with Mortgage Debt (Percent) Median Mortgage Debt (Thousands of 2013 dollars) 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Share of Owners Aged 65 and Over with Mortgage Debt [Left scale] Median Value of Mortgage Debt for Owners With Debt Aged 65 and Over [Right scale] Notes: Mortgage debt is debt on a primary residence. The share with mortgage debt is among owners only. Median value of mortgage debt is among owners with mortgage debt only and in constant 2013 dollars adjusted for inflation using the CPI-U-RS. Source: JCHS tabulations of US Federal Reserve Board, 2013 Survey of Consumer Finances. 13

By 2035 17 Million Older Households Will Be Cost Burdened, 8 Million Severely So Households (Millions) 12 10 8 6 4 2-2015 2025 2035 2015 2025 2035 Owners Source: JCHS projections. Moderate Severe Renters 14

Potential Future Paths for Owning and Renting

The National Homeownership Rate Has Fallen Back to Early 1990s Levels and Beyond 70 Homeownership Rate (Percent) 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 Source: JCHS tabulations of US Census Bureau, Housing Vacancy Surveys. 16

But Rates Have Fallen Well Below Early 1990s Rates for All But Oldest Age Groups 10 8 6 4 2 0-2 -4-6 -8-10 Change in Homeownership Rate Since 1990 (Percentage Points) 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Age of Household Head 25-34 35-44 45 54 55 64 65-74 75 and Over Note: Based on 3-year annual average rates. Source: JCHS tabulations of US Census Bureau, Current Population Surveys.

Foreclosure-Related Exits Account for Most of the Decline in Owning Among Older Households 12% Homeownership Rate Decline & Foreclosure Exits by Age Group 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 18-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 56-65 66-75 >75 Homeownership Rate Decline, 2005-2015 Estimated Foreclosure Rate Source: JCHS tabulations of CPS ASEC and CoreLogic data on foreclosure completions. 18

Homeownership Rate Projection Scenarios 1. Base Scenario: 2015 constant rates by age, race/ethnicity, & family type 2. Low Scenario: Continue 2010-15 cohort trend through 2020 Constant 2020 rates thereafter 3. High Scenario: Rates rebound to higher of 1995 vs. 2015 rate 19

Scenarios Differ Most at Middle Ages 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Projected Homeownership Rate by Age in 2025. Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 2005 Actual Source: JCHS projections based on CPS ASEC and Census population projections. 20

Projection Scenarios Produce a 2025 Range from 61 to 65 Percent 66% 65% 64% 63% 62% 61% Projected Homeownership Rate, 2015-2035. 60% 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Scenario 1 - Base Scenario 2 - Low Scenario 3 - High Source: JCHS projections. 21

Three Scenarios Present Very Different Trajectories for Future Homeownership Rates by Age Homeownership Rate 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% <25 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80Plus 1995 Age Curve 2015 Age Curve 22

Three Scenarios Present Very Different Trajectories for Future Homeownership Rates by Age Homeownership Rate 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% <25 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80Plus 1995 Age Curve 2015 Age Curve 1971-75 Birth Cohort Trajectory 23

Three Scenarios Present Very Different Trajectories for Future Homeownership Rates by Age Homeownership Rate 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% <25 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80Plus 1995 Age Curve 2015 Age Curve 1971-75 Birth Cohort Trajectory Projection: 5-yr Cohort Trends Projection: 2015 Constant Rates Projection: 1995 Constant Rates 24

Under Base Projections Owner and Renter Growth Would be Similar to 1985-1995 Period 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0-0.2 Historical and Projected Average Annual Household Growth (Millions) 1995 1985-1995- 2005 Owners 2005-2015 2015-2025 1995 Low Base High 1985-1995- 2005 Renters 2005-2015 Low Base High 2015-2025 Source: JCHS projections. 25

Rethinking How We Measure Housing Affordability

Number of Cost-Burdened Renters Still Near Record High while Number of Cost-Burdened Owners Continues to Fall 24 Number of Cost-Burdened Households (Millions) 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Owners Renters Note: Cost burdens are defined as housing costs (rent and utilities) that are more than 30 percent of household income. Source: JCHS tabulations of US Census Bureau, American Community Surveys. : 27

Even Moderate Income Renters Struggle to Afford Housing, Particularly in High-Cost Metros 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Share of Cost-Burdened Renter Households (Percent) Less than $15,000 $15,000 29,999 $30,000 $44,999 $45,000 74,999 $75,000 and Over All Renter Households Household Income Cleveland Phoenix Los Angeles Notes: Cost burdens are defined as housing costs of more than 30% of household income. The top ten high-cost metros are based on metro rankings by median monthly gross rents. Source: JCHS tabulations of the American Community Survey, 2013. 28

A Residual Income Approach to Assessing Cost Burdens Illuminates Extreme Challenges Facing Lowest-Income Households 6,000 Average Monthly Income and Costs in 2015 (Dollars) 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 (1,000) Household Income Category Under $15,000 $15,000-$29,999 $30,000-$44,999 $45,000-$74,999 Household Income Non-Housing Expenses Residual Income Available for Housing Costs Gross Rent Notes: Extremely (Very Low, Low and Moderate) incomes are defined as less than 30 percent of area median income (30-49..9%, 50-79.9%, 80-99.9%). Residual income is household income less non-housing expenses. Renters include only households with up to four members. Sources: Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies tabulations of data from US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2015, Center for Women s Welfare self-sufficiency standards, Urban Institute and Brookings Tax Policy Center. 29

Share of Cost Burdened Renters in Cleveland Based on 30% of Income Standard and Residual Income Approach 100 80 60 40 20 Cost Burdened Renters in 2015 (Percent) 0 <$15K $15-29.9K $30- $44.9K Household Income $45- $74.9K Single Persons Families with Children Couples Household Type 30% of Income Standard Residual Income Standard All Renters Notes: Extremely (Very Low, Low and Moderate) incomes are defined as less than 30 percent of area median income (30-49..9%, 50-79.9%, 80-99.9%). Residual income is household income less non-housing expenses. Sources: Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies tabulations of data from US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2015, Center for Women s Welfare self-sufficiency standards, Urban Institute and Brookings Tax Policy Center. 30

A Residual Income Measure Produces a Different Pattern of Affordability in Low and High Cost Areas Impact of Switching to Residual-Income Method on Renter Cost Burden Rates (Percent) 20 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 -20-25 -30 <$15K $15-29.9K $30-$44.9K$45-$74.9K Single Persons Los Angeles Phoenix Cleveland Families with Kids All Renters Notes: Differences in burdens are relative to those using the traditional 30% of income standard. Extremely (Very Low, Low and Moderate) incomes are defined as less than 30 percent of area median income (30-49..9%, 50-79.9%, 80-99.9%). Residual income is household income less non-housing expenses. Renters include only households with up to four members. Sources: Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies tabulations of data from US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2015, Center for Women s Welfare self-sufficiency standards, Urban Institute and Brookings Tax Policy Center. 31