BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

Similar documents
STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

TO THE HONORABLE COMMISSIONERS OF THE NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES:

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

Attachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A.

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Docket No. DE 17-

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES. Mr. Fredric Stoffel

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID L. CHONG

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

SECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KENNETH J. DEREMER (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018

STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE THE HONORABLE WALTER J. BRASWELL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A.

New York State Gas Ratemaking Concepts

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

THE YORK WATER COMPANY York, PA

Testimony Experience of Timothy S. Lyons

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION UNITED WATER PENNSYLVANIA, INC. Docket No. R Direct Testimony. Lisa A. Boyd

Accounting Analysis of Ameren Gas Rate Case Docket No Mary Selvaggio, Accounting Department, Manager

UGI UTILITIES, INC. GAS DIVISION

RR1 - Page 181 of 518

EXETER ASSOCIATES, INC Little Patuxent Parkway Suite 300 Columbia, Maryland 21044

APPENDIX A TO JOINT REVENUE REQUIREMENT STUDY FOR CUC & GHU WASTEWATER UTILITIES GOLDEN HEART UTILITIES WASTEWATER UTILITY

S T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * *

STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE HONORABLE IRENE JONES, ALJ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

PUC DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES

STATE OF VERMONT PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) PREFILED TESTIMONY OF LAUREN HAMMER ON BEHALF OF VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC.

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Kevin M.

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO.

STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TYSON D. PORTER REGULATORY ANALYST.


DOCKET NO. 13A-0773EG DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF LEE E. GABLER

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Jeffrey L.

NATIONAL GRID - ELECTRIC FY2015 REVENUE REQUIREMENT RECONCILIATION ELECTRIC INFRASTRUCTURE, SAFETY AND RELIABILITY PLAN RIPUC DOCKET NO.

Before the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission of the State of South Dakota

Superseding Sheet No. 96 REVISED SHEET NO. 96 Effective May 4, 2012 Effective June 1, 2013

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Kevin M.

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN D. ROETGER, WILLIAM R. JACOBS, JR PH.D, MARK D. RAUCKHORST AND DAVID P. POROCH,

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. R PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No.

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO.

NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DANIEL T. NAWAZELSKI LEAD-LAG STUDY EXHIBIT DTN-1. New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE LOW INCOME PANEL

STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE HONORABLE WALTER J. BRASWELL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS. DOUG LITTLE, Chairman BOB STUMP BOB BURNS TOM FORESE ANDY TOBIN

STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE THE HONORABLE GAIL M. COOKSON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Authorized By: New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, Richard S. Mroz, President, Joseph L.

DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS

2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. State of Minnesota

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE ANNUAL REPORT

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

Superseding Sheet No. 89 REVISED SHEET NO. 89 Effective April 9, 2012 Effective June 1, 2013 RATE ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM PROVISION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PREPARED TESTIMONY DON MALONE PUBLIC UTILITY AUDITOR ON BEHALF OF THE STAFF OF THE

January Submitted to: State of Rhode lsland and Providence Plantations Public Utilities Commission. RIPUC Docket No.

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PANEL

RE: Docket No. UW 158 In the Matter of SALMON VALLEY WATER COMPANY, Request for a General Rate Revision.

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

CHAPTER III COST TRACKING & REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOHNNY M. HULEIS

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY MELISSA L. OSTROM.

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (CRB-3) Multi-Year Rate Plan

HSB Bancorp, Inc. & Subsidiary

PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY. Pennsylvania Electric Company Statement of Reasons for Rate Changes

PERFORMANCE BONUS PROGRAM 2018

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY REGINA L. BUTLER DIRECTOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES SECTION

Exhibit Nets Sports and Entertainment, LLC and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2010 and 2009

Exhibit A Affidavit of Alan Varvis

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WYOMING ) ) ) ) PREFILED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF JONI JOHNSON-POWE INDEX QUALIFICATIONS...

UGI UTILITIES, INC. GAS DIVISION

BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DOCKET NO EI

FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION VOTE SHEET. Apri110, 2014 DEFERRED

ow State of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Application of Abenaki Water Company For Approval of a Rate Adjustment

BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Rebuttal Testimony of Bruce N. Williams

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JAWAAD A. MALIK (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018

NARRAGANSETT BAY COMMISSION ONE SERVICE ROAD, PROVIDENCE, RI 02905

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1910

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ) ) ) ) )

STATE OF ALASKA BEFORE THE REGULATORY COMMISSION OF ALASKA ) ) ) ) ) PREFILED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DANIEL M. DIECKGRAEFF

RR16 - Page 57 of

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

CHAPTER 5 REVENUE REQUIREMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN AND RAMON GONZALES ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

January Submitted to: State of Rhode lsland and Providence Plantations Public Utilities Commission. RIPUC Docket No.

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION

Transcription:

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FOR APPROVAL OF INCREASED TARIFF RATES AND CHARGES FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE, CHANGE IN DEPRECIATION RATES AND OTHER TARIFF MODIFICATIONS BPU Docket No. WR0 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID L. WEBER Exhibit PT-

WEBER PT-. Q. Please state your name and business address. A. My name is David L. Weber, and my business address is Woodcrest Road, Cherry Hill, New Jersey 000.. Q. By whom are you employed and in what capacity? A. I am employed by the American Water Works Service Company, Inc. ( Service Company ) as Senior Manager of Regulatory Services. 0. Q. What are your responsibilities in this position? A. My current duties consist of preparing and overseeing the preparation of work papers, exhibits, testimony and interrogatory responses in support of rate applications and other regulatory filings for the regulated companies within the Eastern Division of American Water Works Company, Inc. ( American Water ).. Q. Please describe your educational background and professional associations. A. I received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Accounting from Cedarville University in and a Master of Business Administration degree in Finance from Drexel University in 000. I am a Certified Management Accountant and a Certified Public Accountant. I have also attended the Utility Rate School sponsored by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners ( NARUC ). 0. Q. What has been your business experience? A. From to I was employed as an Accountant by the public accounting firms of George S. Olive & Co and Brandy, Ware & Schoenfeld, Inc. in Richmond, Indiana. In I began employment with Service Company as an Accountant. From

WEBER PT- to 00, I held various positions within Accounting and Finance. Since 00, I have held various positions within Rate Regulation.. Q. Have you previously submitted testimony in regulatory proceedings? A. Yes, I have prepared written, pre-filed testimony before the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities in the Company s 00 general rate case, BPU Docket No. WR00000. 0. Q. What is the purpose of your testimony in this proceeding? A. I have prepared, or caused to be prepared, for New Jersey-American Water Company, Inc. ( NJAWC or the Company ) certain exhibits and schedules, which reflect its accounting and financial condition and which support NJAWC s petition for increased rates. The schedules include Exhibit P-, Other Operations and Maintenance Expense ( Other O&M ) - Schedule ; Property Tax Expense Schedule ; Income Tax Expense Schedule ; Consolidated FIT component of rate base Schedule, and Deferred Federal Income Taxes (FIT) (accelerated depreciation) component of rate base Schedule. 0 OTHER O&M EXPENSE. Q. Please explain Exhibit P-, Schedule. A. Other O&M Expense includes all expenses of delivering service not captured elsewhere. This includes a variety of costs including contract services, building maintenance costs, office supplies, and maintenance of the water and sewer systems. The schedule shows the base year expense as compared to the Pro Forma level of

WEBER PT- expense. Base Year expense totaled $,,0. Pro Forma expense is equal to $,0,. This is an increase of $, or.% from the base year per books. 0 0. Q. Please describe the adjustments made to the base year to arrive at the pro forma expense. A. Six adjustments were made. The adjustments are described below and more detail can be found in SIR-.. Advertising Removed advertising expenses. The Company is not seeking cost recovery for these expenses.. Penalties Removed penalties expenses. The Company is not seeking cost recovery for these expenses.. Water Diversion Expense Invoices for Other O&M were miscoded to Water Diversion Expense in the base year. The adjustment reclassified these invoices from Water Diversion Expense to Other O&M. The result of the adjustment is $ increase in Other O&M and decrease to Water Diversion Expense.. DSIC Revenue Under-Recovery Adjustment to amortize the under-recovery of the Company s authorized level of DSIC revenues for the period June 0 through December 0. The Company under-recovered actual DSIC revenues of $, for the period June 0 through July 0 and is projecting an additional $, through December 0 for a total underrecovery of $,0. The Company is proposing to record the under-

WEBER PT- recovery in a regulatory asset and amortize the recovery in base rates over a two-year period.. Revenue Stabilization Mechanism ( RSM ) Communication Expense Adjustment to include expenses for customer communication regarding the implementation of the proposed RSM. Please refer to the direct testimony of Company Witness Destefano, Exhibit PT-, under the section entitled RSM.. Credit Card Payment Expense Adjustment to include fees currently incurred by customers paying by credit card or electronic check as discussed in my direct testimony, below. 0 0. Q. What is the fee that customers are currently charged for paying with a credit card? A. Customers are currently charged $. for each transaction. The Company has contracted that rate with a third-party vendor responsible for processing the transactions. The transaction is made directly between the customer and the thirdparty vendor; the Company does not collect the current $. charge. 0. Q. Will these transaction process fees continue to be incurred? A. Yes, but the Company is proposing that the fees incurred between the customer and the third-party vendor be recovered through the general ratemaking process, and be paid directly by the Company. The Company s estimate of the pro forma fees, based upon number of credit card payments made by customers within the base year, is $,0.

WEBER PT-. Q. Do other utility companies offer customers the option of paying with a credit card with no fee? A. Utilities have taken a varied approach. Some charge a fee and others offer customers the credit card payment option free of charge. Jersey Central Power & Light charges customers for making a one-time payment via credit card, but does not directly charge a fee if the customer enrolls in the Automatic Credit Card Payment Program. Suez 0 (formerly United Water) Toms River received Board approval in Board Docket No. WR000 to absorb the fees incurred by customers paying via credit card and recover those fees through base rates. Suez does not charge customers for making payments via credit card, but does not currently offer an automatic credit card payment option.. Q. What is NJAWC proposing in this case? A. NJAWC is proposing to provide the no-fee option to customers who make a one-time payment as well as customers who enroll in an automatic credit card payment program.. Q. How does the Company s proposal benefit customers? A. Providing customers with another option for making payments with no direct cost is intended to increase customer satisfaction and incentivize paperless billing. 0. Q. Please explain further. A. NJAWC is making this proposal in order to continue encouraging customers to use online payment platforms. More than 0% of NJAWC customers pay by mailing a

WEBER PT- physical check. In addition to being a green alternative to submitting payments by mail, the Company anticipates that customer satisfaction will improve. Our customers pay their other bills by credit card with no additional charge and we will simply be affording them the same opportunity. 0. Q. Are there any studies that the Company can point to that support increased customer satisfaction? A. Yes, the 0 J.D. Power & Associates Electric Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction Study found that customers who were given the option of paying without a fee had a higher customer satisfaction index. The same study also cited Fee-Free Card Payment options as a Best Practice. PROPERTY TAX EXPENSE. Q. Please explain Exhibit P-, Schedule. A. Property Taxes are owed to the municipalities in which New Jersey-American has property. Property taxes are assessed annually and paid quarterly. These payments are recorded on the Company s balance sheet as prepayments and amortized monthly to expense. Base Year expense totaled $,,0. Pro Forma expense is equal to $,00,. This is an adjustment of $, from the base year per books. 0. Q. Please describe how pro forma Property Tax expense was calculated. A. The pro forma was calculated by making adjustments to a baseline annual expense. The baseline expense includes bills for the four quarters ending August 0, 0 J.D. Power & Associates Electric Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction Study.

WEBER PT- November 0, February 0, and May 0. Two adjustments were made to the baseline expense. First, the baseline was reduced by an amount of tax savings expected as a result of successful appeals by the company. Second, the baseline expense was increased by a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 0.% to account for anticipated increase in cost from the baseline to the test year period. The CAGR was calculated using four years of expense from April 0 to March 0 and increased the pro forma expense by $,. 0 FEDERAL INCOME TAX EXPENSE. Q. Please explain the Federal Income Tax calculation on Exhibit No. P-, Schedule. A. Exhibit No. P-, Schedule calculates pro forma current and deferred income expenses under both present rates and proposed rates. Current Tax Expense is calculated as pro forma Operating Revenues less pro forma Tax Deductions. The tax deductions include a reduction for permanent, non-deductible items and an increase for tax depreciation over book depreciation. Deferred Tax Expense is equal to Tax Depreciation Over Book Depreciation times the statutory tax rate of %. Deferred Tax Expense was also adjusted for the amortization of excess deferred tax liabilities under the Reverse South Georgia method as well as flow through of amortization of income tax regulatory assets. 0 CONSOLIDATED FIT 0. Q. Please explain the calculation of the Consolidated Federal Income Tax component of rate base on Exhibit No. P-, Schedule.

WEBER PT- A. The Consolidated Federal Income Tax calculation was done in compliance with the methodology adopted by the BPU in Docket No. EO. The calculated consolidated tax adjustment is $,, with a resulting reduction to the Company s rate base of $, after the application of %/% sharing methodology. 0 0 DEFERRED FEDERAL INCOME TAXES. Q. Please explain how the reduction to rate base for Deferred Federal Income Taxes ( Deferred F.I.T. ) (accelerated depreciation) on Exhibit No. P-, Schedule, was determined. A. Base Year Deferred F.I.T. (accelerated depreciation) on plant in service at March, 0 represents the actual balance per the books and records of the Company. Test year activity through March, 0, and certain post-test year additions through September 0, 0, have been calculated based on current year experience and committed construction. Tax depreciation on 0 and 0 committed construction has been calculated on a twenty-five year straight-line basis as specified for water utility property in the Small Business, Health Insurance and Welfare Reform Acts of. The pro forma calculations are shown in the Company s response to SIR-. The Company has reflected Bonus Depreciation at 0% for 0 and 0 and 0% for 0. Additionally the Company has reflected Repairs Expense for all years since 00 and through 0.. Q. Does this conclude your direct testimony? A. Yes, it does.