Property Tax System Overview. Prepared for the Property Tax Working Group

Similar documents
Property Taxation 101 Updated August 2016

2003 Minnesota Tax Incidence Study

2009 Minnesota Tax Incidence Study

Overview of Property Taxes. Presentation to House Property and Local Tax Division January 2017

Laws 2018, Chapter 205 (H.F. 947, 1 st Engrossment) Vetoed Omnibus Tax Bill

Overview of Property Taxes

2007 Minnesota Tax Incidence Study

2013 Omnibus Tax Bill

Tax Incidence Analysis First & Second Omnibus Tax Bills

2011 Minnesota Tax Incidence Study

2013 Minnesota Tax Incidence Study

Chart 1 Property Tax Reform: Four Policy Areas Under Review:

Minnesota University Avenue West, Suite 204, Saint Paul, MN

Property Tax 101. Amy Koethe Dakota County Property Taxation & Records Jeanne Vogt - Ehlers

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators Alabama. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators New York. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

Study of the Metropolitan Area Fiscal Disparities Program

Major State Aids &Taxes A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS, INCLUDING REGIONAL AND COUNTY DATA ON WHERE THE AIDS GO AND WHERE THE TAXES COME FROM

1995 Minnesota Tax Incidence Study

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators New Jersey. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators Georgia. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

Senate File 1209 (Pogemiller, D-Minneapolis) (passed and laid on the table 03/23/05)

06.07 ALTERNATE METHODS OF TAXATION

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators Mississippi. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators New York. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

This publication is a slight revision of four news releases recently made available to Oregon newspapers.

Shifting Property Taxes:

THE FISCAL HEALTH OF INDIANA S LARGER MUNICIPALITIES: CITY OF NEW ALBANY MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Update of An Estimate of the State Intergovernmental Aid Costs of Tax Increment Financing

The City of Arden Hills Truth-In-Taxation Hearing:

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators New Mexico. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators New Mexico. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

Summary of Economic Indicators

Property Taxes: A West Virginia Primer

Truth in Taxation 2018 Proposed Property Tax Levy. Monticello Public Schools District Office December 4, :00 pm

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators Oklahoma. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

Property Tax Calculation Workbook

Governor s Supplemental Budget Tax Proposals Tax and Transportation Bills

THE FISCAL HEALTH OF INDIANA S LARGER MUNICIPALITIES: CITY OF BLOOMINGTON MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Property Tax and Value Workshop for State and Local Officials. December 13, 2012, 6:00 pm

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators Washington. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

OVERVIEW MINNESOTA PROPERTY TAX SYSTEM AND SCHOOL DISTRICT LEVY PROCESS Payable 2006 Levy

How To Calculate A Property Tax

1999 Minnesota Tax Incidence Study

How To Calculate A Property Tax

Property Taxes. Property Taxes. Property Taxes: From Levy Certification to Individual Tax Statement

Statewide General Property Tax October 2017 Special Update

SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 Board of Education

OVERVIEW MINNESOTA PROPERTY TAX SYSTEM AND SCHOOL DISTRICT LEVY PROCESS Payable 2008 Levy

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators Massachusetts. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

Supplement Budget Items, Errata and Omissions to the Governor's Biennial Budget - Change Order #2

C H A P T E R 3 T H E I L L I N O I S R E P O R T

PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED IN MINNESOTA: SUMMARY TABLES FOR TAXES PAYABLE 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators South Carolina. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

Statewide General Property Tax December 2018 Update

The City of Arden Hills Truth-In-Taxation Hearing:

Budget & Proposed 2019 Property Taxes

Background & Overview

Plainfield Community Consolidated School District #202 LOCAL PROPERTY TAX TOPICS, INFORMATION, AND THE 2016 TAX

District of Columbia

The House Proposal for Property Tax Relief & Reform HB 7001 & HJR 7089

A History of the School Operating Levy Referendum

Background & Overview

Governor s 2018 Tax Proposals Tax Bill (H.F.4385/S.F.3982) and MinnesotaCare Tax Extension

2014 Property Values and Assessment Practices Report. Assessment Year 2013

Give Maine s Working Families a Break

FY15 REVENUES. FY 14 Adopted Taxes. General Fund $ $ $753.50

Property Assessment and Taxation. An informational presentation brought to you by the City of Grand Ledge Assessing Department.

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators Arizona. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

Vermont Tax Study. Volume II Case Studies. October 5, Prepared in accordance with Act 215, Sec. 271a of the 2006 Legislative Session

THE FISCAL HEALTH OF INDIANA S LARGER MUNICIPALITIES: CITY OF SOUTH BEND MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Major State Aids &Taxes DATA ON WHERE THE AIDS GO AND WHERE THE TAXES COME FROM

A SHORT AND SIMPLE GLIMPSE AT THE PROPERTY TAX IN NEW JERSEY

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators New Mexico. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

Limited Market Value (LMV) A Study of Who Benefits and Who Pays. Presented by Dan Salomone, Commissioner February 2005

Arizona s Tax System. Presentation to Arizona Economic Forum Kevin McCarthy June 21, 2002 ATRA

Hopkins Public Schools #270. December 5, 2017 Presented by John Toop Director of Business Services

REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND DEBT OF MINNESOTA CITIES OVER 2,500 IN POPULATION YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

GOVERNOR S Supplemental Budget Tax Proposals

During the 1995 legislative session, the exemption for primary residential property was increased

MINNESOTA Department of Revenue

PUBLIC HEARING BUDGET AND PROPOSED 2017 PROPERTY TAXES. Staples-Motley ISD 2170 Information on Changes to School Property Taxes.

The Property Tax in New York State. Condition Report Prepared for the Education Finance Research Consortium December 2008

Financial Information and Operating Data Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016

Department of Revenue Analysis of H.F. 848, 1st Unofficial Engrossment, Articles 2-3, 5-12, 15 as amended (SCH0848A84)

THE FISCAL HEALTH OF INDIANA S LARGER MUNICIPALITIES: CITY OF GREENWOOD MUNICIPAL PROFILE

REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND DEBT OF MINNESOTA COUNTIES YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators South Carolina. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

Robert J. Schillerstrom. Chairman: DuPage County Board. Ad Hoc Committee on Residential Exemptions

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators North Carolina. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

Department of Revenue Analysis of H.F (Abrams)/ S.F (Moua) As Proposed to be Amended. General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0

TOWN OF SUDBURY The Residential Exemption Report

State Options for Replacing Local Property Taxes

Property Tax, State and Local Taxes and the New Jersey Constitution ******* Supplemental Slides

Governor s Tax Bill. March 4, 2005

A RIPEC Report on Rhode Island s State and Local Tax System March 25, 2008

6TH EDITION STATE HANDBOOK OF ECONOMIC, DEMOGRAPHIC & FISCAL INDICATORS. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE

Provide homestead incentive to property classified as 1a (residential), 1b (blind/disabled) and 2a HGA (agricultural)

VIEWPOINT state tax notes

Property Tax Inventory

Transcription:

Property Tax System Overview Prepared for the Property Tax Working Group Property Tax Research 9/27/2010

Introduction Property tax in Minnesota is an ad valorem tax. This means that property is taxed according to its value. Property tax is a major source of revenue for local units of government including cities, counties, and school districts. It is also the only tax that is subject to local review. Values and classifications may be appealed to Local and County Boards of Appeal and Equalization and/or Tax Court. In addition, public hearings must be held each year by local units of government to discuss the upcoming year s budget. Appraised values that are used for tax purposes must be accurate and equalized so the tax burden will be distributed fairly. Property taxes are a stable and predictable source of revenue for local units of government. However, the property tax system in Minnesota is also complicated and may not be predictable for the taxpayer. It often does not reflect ability to pay based on a taxpayer s current income. Minnesota s power of taxation is found in Article X of the Constitution of the State of Minnesota. The article states that the power of taxation will never be surrendered, suspended, or contracted away. It also states that the taxes will be uniform upon the same class of subjects and will be levied for public purposes. This uniformity clause is important in that it permits the use of different classification rates to be applied to different classes of property. Article X also exempts certain types of properties from taxation, including public schools, public hospitals, and churches. A brief history of the property tax The property tax was established by the Minnesota territorial legislature. The classification system was established in 1913 with 4 classes of property. The number of classes has increased dramatically since then. In the early 1970 s, the so-called Minnesota Miracle replaced local property taxes with state aids to schools and other local governments. Minnesota s state-shared revenues became (and remain) among the most generous in the nation. In exchange for the state aid, local governments were subjected to state-imposed property tax levy limits and restricted from imposing other taxes. The state sales and income taxes were raised to pay for the aid increases. As intended, local property taxes declined sharply. In 1971, property taxes comprised more than 42 percent of total state and local tax revenues. By the early 1980s when the impact of the Minnesota Miracle peaked property taxes were down to less than 24 percent of total state and local tax revenues. From 1968 until 2001, property taxes were solely levied and collected at the local level. In 2001, the Legislature enacted the state general tax, which is paid only by some classes of property, including seasonal residential recreational and commercial/industrial property. This portion of the property tax is levied by the state, but it is collected by each county as part of the property tax. Further reform in 2001 aimed at making the property tax more purely a local tax. It provided for full state funding of the state-determined general education formula, and reduced aid to cities and counties. It reformed property tax classification rates to ensure more equity in the taxation of different kinds of property. Classification, state aids and levy limitations aren t the only tool that has been used to control tax burdens. Value limitations and exclusions, tax deferrals, tax credits and refunds have all been implemented in myriad ways over the past 50 years. 1 Property Tax System Overview Minnesota Department of Revenue

Administering and monitoring the system The tax is administered by 87 counties, several computer consortiums, and software vendors. The system is comprised of approximately 2,800 individual taxing jurisdictions (cities, schools, counties, towns, special districts) and over 2.5 million property parcels. The state is also very diverse with respect to topography, land use, and real estate markets which greatly affect both property classification determinations and market valuations. The total market value of taxable property in the State exceeds $ 580 billion and the system generates over $7.5 billion in tax revenue including over $700 million in state general tax. The Department of Revenue performs oversight and administration of the state s property tax system. Oversight roles include: the equalization of local assessments through sales ratio studies, review of assessments, and the issuance of orders through the State Board of Equalization; monitoring compliance with state property tax laws; licensing assessors through the State Board of Assessors; providing training, manuals, directives, and other assistance to county assessors, auditors, and treasurers; and providing research and information about property taxes to policy makers and the public. The 2010 legislature asked that the department provide additional information regarding property tax principles. To better evaluate the various property tax proposals that come before the legislature, the following basic property tax principles should be taken into consideration: (1) transparency and understandability; (2) simplicity and efficiency; (3) equity; (4) stability and predictability; (5) compliance and accountability; (6) competitiveness; and (7) responsiveness to economic conditions. The same legislation identified a number of reports and other resources that are critical indicators of the property tax system. The balance of this document reviews many of these indicators. 2 Property Tax System Overview Minnesota Department of Revenue

Price of Government Report The Price of Government report is a measure of the cost of all general government services statewide. It answers the question: How much do Minnesotans pay to state and local governments in total? It is comprehensive and includes nearly all revenues generated by state and local units of government as well as public school districts. All state taxes, property taxes, special assessments, fees and charges are included. Federal revenues are not included. The measure serves as a financial index for the cost of public services in Minnesota. $40.0 $35.0 $30.0 Total Own Source Revenues for State & Local Governments All Other Revenues Other Taxes Property Tax Billions of Dollars $25.0 $20.0 $15.0 $10.0 $5.0 $0.0 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Source: Minnesota Department of Revenue and Price of Government, End of Session 2010 Fiscal Year 3 Property Tax System Overview Minnesota Department of Revenue

Price of Government Report (continued) The annual receipts collected by each unit of government are considered to represent the aggregate costs that Minnesota taxpayers pay for public services. The Price of Government measures that cost for each fiscal year relative to Minnesota Personal Income. The result is stated as a percentage of statewide personal income. Minnesota Price of Government State and Local Revenues as a % of Personal Income 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 15.8% 15.8% 16.1% 15.6% 15.0% 15.8% 15.9% 16.2% 15.4% 15.2% 15.0% 15.5% 15.6% 15.9% 15.7% 17.3% 17.4% 17.6% 17.6% 17.9% 17.4% 17.3% 16.6% For calendar year 2009, fiscal year 2010, the Price of Government is estimated at 15.6 percent. In other words, for every dollar of Minnesota taxpayer personal income, 15.6 cents will be paid to the state and local governments for services during that year. http://www.mmb.state.mn.us/doc/budget/report-pog/may10.pdf 4 Property Tax System Overview Minnesota Department of Revenue

Price of Government Report (continued) The chart above shows the mix of tax collections by state and local governments. The Minnesota Miracle shifted the main source of education funding in the state from local taxes to state aids, reducing property taxes by instead increasing income and sales tax rates. The Big Plan 2001 Reform created a statewide property tax on business and cabin property and increased state aid to schools to replace the general education levy while increasing property tax relief to residential homesteads. Tax Collection Amounts ($ Billions) Property Tax Income Tax Sales Taxes Other Taxes FY 2010 $7.7 $6.7 $5.1 $4.0 FY 2009 $7.3 $6.9 $5.0 $4.0 FY 2008 $6.8 $7.8 $5.3 $4.1 FY 2005 $5.4 $6.3 $4.9 $3.9 FY 2000 $4.6 $5.6 $4.4 $3.3 FY 1995 $4.1 $3.8 $3.1 $2.6 FY 1990 $3.0 $2.9 $2.2 $1.7 5 Property Tax System Overview Minnesota Department of Revenue

Property Tax Levies The table below shows property tax levies by jurisdiction. In the years immediately preceding the 2001 Big Plan reforms the average total increase in levies was 4%. From 2002 through 2008 the average increase was 7.5%. Two main contributors to the increased rate of change are aid cuts to cities and counties and growth in the passage of school referenda levies. Since the 2008 recession increases have moderated significantly despite continued cuts to city and county aids. $9.0 Property Tax Levies by Jurisdictions Billions of Dollars $8.0 $7.0 $6.0 $5.0 $4.0 $3.0 State Towns and Special Districts School Districts Cities (incl. TIF) Counties $2.0 $1.0 $0.0 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Calendar Year Source: Minnesota Department of Revenue 6 Property Tax System Overview Minnesota Department of Revenue

Tax Incidence Report The Minnesota Tax Incidence Study reports the distribution of state and local taxes in relation to taxpayer income. It answers the question, Who pays Minnesota s taxes? The major objective is to provide taxpayers and policymakers with important information on the equity or fairness of the overall distribution of Minnesota taxes. The following table shows projected 2011 net property tax by population decile, including business taxes that are ultimately bourn by Minnesotans through lower wages and higher prices. The table confirms the regressivity of the property tax. Population Decile 2011 Population Deciles Amounts ($Thousands) Property Tax Components Income Range Percent Share of Household Income Total Residential Taxes 1 Nonresidential Local Property Taxes State Property Tax Property Tax Refund Total Net Property Taxes Property Tax as a % of Income Total Tax as a % of Income First $11,201 & Under 0.9% $148,039 $56,711 $12,062 -$70,555 $146,257 8.45% 22.1% Second $11,202 - $18,454 2.0% 155,951 54,659 14,352-94,785 130,177 3.42% 11.2% Third $18,455 - $26,461 3.0% 236,064 65,644 18,141-95,229 224,621 3.91% 11.1% Fourth $26,462 - $35,169 4.1% 299,881 81,407 20,983-89,265 313,005 3.96% 11.7% Fifth $35,170 - $45,349 5.4% 391,286 105,854 25,540-58,120 464,561 4.51% 12.8% Sixth $45,350 - $58,040 6.9% 466,853 124,434 28,725-48,663 571,348 4.32% 12.5% Seventh $58,041 - $74,595 8.9% 566,515 136,370 35,131-28,078 709,939 4.18% 12.5% Eighth $74,596 - $96,681 11.5% 634,384 134,538 40,445-11,106 798,261 3.65% 12.1% Ninth $96,682 - $136,954 15.4% 784,774 193,758 52,102-2,125 1,028,509 3.50% 11.9% Tenth $136,955 & Over 41.8% 1,278,034 399,767 118,164-1,874 1,794,091 2.25% 10.1% TOTALS 100% $4,961,782 $1,353,142 $365,645 -$499,800 $6,180,769 3.24% 11.4% Top 5% Over $193,687 31.0% $775,400 $282,037 $83,442 -$1,036 $1,139,843 1.93% 9.7% Top 1% Over $481,439 16.0% $236,455 $113,018 $37,801 -$144 $387,129 1.27% 8.8% 1 Includes seasonal recreational residential (cabins). Source: 2009 Tax Incidence Report, MN Department of Revenue http://taxes.state.mn.us/legal_policy/pages/research_reports_content_incidence.aspx 7 Property Tax System Overview Minnesota Department of Revenue

Homestead Property Tax Burden Report This report focuses on the incidence of direct property taxes on homesteaded property. The property tax-income (Voss) database contains data on estimated market value, state-paid property tax refunds, net property tax, and homesteader income for each homestead in the state. The following table presents tax burdens by income range before and after the application of the homestead market value credit (HMVC) and property tax refund (PTR). Income range* Homestead Tax Burden by Income Median burden before MVHC Median burden before PTR Median burden after PTR $10,000 -$30,000 7.6 6.4 3.8 $30,000 - $45,000 4.8 4.2 3.3 $45,000 - $65,000 3.7 3.3 3.1 $65,000 - $90,000 3.1 2.8 2.8 $90,000 - $125,000 2.6 2.5 2.4 $125,000 or more 1.9 1.8 1.8 Overall 3.3 3.0 2.8 *Homesteads with income under $10,000 not shown due to data issues As a percent of income, burdens are higher for lower income homesteaders. (Property tax is a tax on value, not income) MVHC makes the homestead property tax somewhat less regressive. The PTR program, which is income-based, has a much stronger moderating affect on lower income homesteaders burdens. Under 10,000 income issue: needs more analysis to differentiate temporarily income poor from perennially poor. 39,000 households (3% of total) Property tax burdens vary across regions, within regions, and among income ranges. Regional median tax burdens range from 3.62 percent of income in Minneapolis to 1.79 percent of income in Southwestern Minnesota. http://taxes.state.mn.us/property_tax_administrators/pages/other_supporting_content_vossreports_main.aspx 8 Property Tax System Overview Minnesota Department of Revenue

Homestead Property Tax Burden Report (continued) Regional Median Tax Burdens There are many possible reasons for variation in the average homestead tax burden, including: Level of public services: The level and cost of local spending varies. Townships provide fewer services than cities. School district referenda levies are not uniform. Community preferences for public goods and services vary. Intergovernmental aid and other revenues: Dependency on property tax varies based state/fed aid received and extent of fees, charges and other non-property tax revenues Tax base composition and property tax classification system: The amount of non-homesteaded property and state laws that establish the relative share of market value subject to tax profoundly impact the extent to which taxes are paid by homesteaders rather than owners of other types of property. Property tax refunds, credits, exclusions: tax liability is reduced if the homesteader qualifies for various programs 9 Property Tax System Overview Minnesota Department of Revenue

State Tax Rankings The Minnesota Department of Revenue calculates tax and revenue rankings for the 50 states and the District of Columbia based on U.S. Census Bureau government finance reports. The table below shows Minnesota s historical ranking for 1) total state and local taxes, and 2) property tax, as a percent of personal income. Minnesota's Tax Ranking State and Local Tax Collections as a Percent of Personal Income - 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 10 5 5 5 5 5 8 7 Rank (of 51) 20 30 40 15 15 19 20 Total State and Local Taxes Property Tax 24 26 23 18 37 20 18 35 34 20 19 32 30 50 Source: Census Bureau, Fiscal Year Data and MN Department of Revenue *Data is unavailable for FY2001 & 2003. The U.S. Census Bureau did not publish state-by-state local government finances for those years. http://taxes.state.mn.us/legal_policy/pages/research_reports_tax_rankings.aspx 10 Property Tax System Overview Minnesota Department of Revenue

Effective Tax Rates Effective tax rates show the property taxes paid as a percent of the property s taxable value. For every dollar of value, commercial, industrial and utility value pays three times the property taxes than other types of property. Effective tax rates decline when taxes increase more than value (or decrease less than value). Effective tax rates have risen for all property classes except farm for the last couple years after a decade of steady decline. 7% Effective Tax Rates by Class 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% Agricultural Residential Homestead Other Residential Comm/Ind/Util 1% 0% 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Market Value Trends The recent recession brought overall declines in taxable values in all property classes except agricultural (class 2a and 2b) property. Agricultural property saw a spike in value for assessment year 2009, used for taxes payable in 2010. Ag values have since moderated but are still increasing. When values change at different rates, tax burdens can shift among property types and state aids can shift among jurisdictions. 25% Taxable Market Value Percent Change by Class 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% Agricultural Seasonal/Rec Residential Comm/Ind -10% 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Assessment Year 11 Property Tax System Overview Minnesota Department of Revenue

Property Class Preference: Share of Market Value and Net Tax This chart shows how classification, exclusions, deferrals and credits change the final incidence of the property tax. Preferred classes (residential and agricultural) pay less tax per dollar of value than commercial, industrial and utility property. 2010 Property Taxes by Class 100% 13.26% 1.60% 3.65% 80% 15.13% 31.22% Other Commercial/Industrial 60% 40% 52.92% 13.85% Other Residential Residential Agricultural 44.33% 20% 0% 17.11% Estimated Market Value 6.98% Net Tax 12 Property Tax System Overview Minnesota Department of Revenue