PhD Qualifier Examination

Similar documents
PhD Qualifier Examination

PhD Qualifier Examination

Department of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. August 2010

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Midterm Questions and Answers Econ 8712

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017

Microeconomic Theory August 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program August 2017

General Examination in Microeconomic Theory SPRING 2014

EXTRA PROBLEMS. and. a b c d

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Questions and Answers Econ 8712

The test has 13 questions. Answer any four. All questions carry equal (25) marks.

d. Find a competitive equilibrium for this economy. Is the allocation Pareto efficient? Are there any other competitive equilibrium allocations?

CHOICE THEORY, UTILITY FUNCTIONS AND RISK AVERSION

Mock Examination 2010

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY. Department of Economics. January Written Portion of the Comprehensive Examination for

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2015

Models and Decision with Financial Applications UNIT 1: Elements of Decision under Uncertainty

Choice under risk and uncertainty

Microeconomic Theory May 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program.

KIER DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES

Department of Agricultural Economics PhD Qualifier Examination January 2005

University of Hong Kong

Name. Final Exam, Economics 210A, December 2014 Answer any 7 of these 8 questions Good luck!

Ph.D. MICROECONOMICS CORE EXAM August 2018

Strategy -1- Strategy

Cooperative Ph.D. Program in Agricultural and Resource Economics, Economics, and Finance QUALIFYING EXAMINATION IN MICROECONOMICS

PAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV

Uncertainty in Equilibrium

Microeconomics II. CIDE, MsC Economics. List of Problems

EC202. Microeconomic Principles II. Summer 2009 examination. 2008/2009 syllabus

Game theory and applications: Lecture 1

S 2,2-1, x c C x r, 1 0,0

UCLA Department of Economics Ph.D. Preliminary Exam Industrial Organization Field Exam (Spring 2010) Use SEPARATE booklets to answer each question

MICROECONOMICS COMPREHENSIVE EXAM

Games of Incomplete Information

Problem Set VI: Edgeworth Box

Competitive Outcomes, Endogenous Firm Formation and the Aspiration Core

Outline Introduction Game Representations Reductions Solution Concepts. Game Theory. Enrico Franchi. May 19, 2010

Microeconomics Comprehensive Exam

Chapter 10: Mixed strategies Nash equilibria, reaction curves and the equality of payoffs theorem

Problem Set 2 - SOLUTIONS

Introduction to game theory LECTURE 2

6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 3: Strategic Form Games - Solution Concepts

Financial Economics Field Exam January 2008

Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average)

Assignment 5 Advanced Microeconomics

Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 2

Comprehensive Exam. August 19, 2013

Games of Incomplete Information ( 資訊不全賽局 ) Games of Incomplete Information

Advanced Financial Economics Homework 2 Due on April 14th before class

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

Midterm #2 EconS 527 [November 7 th, 2016]

Microeconomics. Please remember Spring 2018

Econ 101A Final Exam We May 9, 2012.

Economics Honors Exam Review (Micro) Mar Based on Zhaoning Wang s final review packet for Ec 1010a, Fall 2013

10.1 Elimination of strictly dominated strategies

Game Theory. Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari. Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India August 2012

ANASH EQUILIBRIUM of a strategic game is an action profile in which every. Strategy Equilibrium

Outline for today. Stat155 Game Theory Lecture 13: General-Sum Games. General-sum games. General-sum games. Dominated pure strategies

6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 10: Introduction to Game Theory 2

Microeconomics Qualifying Exam

Course Handouts - Introduction ECON 8704 FINANCIAL ECONOMICS. Jan Werner. University of Minnesota

B w x y z a 4,4 3,3 5,1 2,2 b 3,6 2,5 6,-3 1,4 A c -2,0 2,-1 0,0 2,1 d 1,4 1,2 1,1 3,5

Lecture 3 Representation of Games

UCLA Department of Economics Ph. D. Preliminary Exam Micro-Economic Theory

Version A. Problem 1. Let X be the continuous random variable defined by the following pdf: 1 x/2 when 0 x 2, f(x) = 0 otherwise.

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Answers Econ 8712

ECE 586GT: Problem Set 1: Problems and Solutions Analysis of static games

Game Theory - Lecture #8

Answers to June 11, 2012 Microeconomics Prelim

Strategies and Nash Equilibrium. A Whirlwind Tour of Game Theory

Risk aversion and choice under uncertainty

Final Examination December 14, Economics 5010 AF3.0 : Applied Microeconomics. time=2.5 hours

Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 3

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Answers Econ 8712

Lecture 8: Asset pricing

ASHORTCOURSEIN INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS WITH CALCULUS. allan

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

PAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV. If any mistakes or typos are spotted, kindly communicate them to

Introduction to Game Theory

In the Name of God. Sharif University of Technology. Microeconomics 2. Graduate School of Management and Economics. Dr. S.

MA200.2 Game Theory II, LSE

MICROECONOMIC THEROY CONSUMER THEORY

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions

Financial Economics Field Exam August 2011

EC476 Contracts and Organizations, Part III: Lecture 3

ECE 586BH: Problem Set 5: Problems and Solutions Multistage games, including repeated games, with observed moves

On Existence of Equilibria. Bayesian Allocation-Mechanisms

This assignment is due on Tuesday, September 15, at the beginning of class (or sooner).

Chair of Communications Theory, Prof. Dr.-Ing. E. Jorswieck. Übung 5: Supermodular Games

SI 563 Homework 3 Oct 5, Determine the set of rationalizable strategies for each of the following games. a) X Y X Y Z

All Equilibrium Revenues in Buy Price Auctions

Micro Theory I Assignment #5 - Answer key

A. Introduction to choice under uncertainty 2. B. Risk aversion 11. C. Favorable gambles 15. D. Measures of risk aversion 20. E.

Supplemental Material: Buyer-Optimal Learning and Monopoly Pricing

M.Phil. Game theory: Problem set II. These problems are designed for discussions in the classes of Week 8 of Michaelmas term. 1

1 Dynamic programming

Time, Uncertainty, and Incomplete Markets

Financial Economics: Making Choices in Risky Situations

Lecture 6 Introduction to Utility Theory under Certainty and Uncertainty

Transcription:

PhD Qualifier Examination Department of Agricultural Economics May 29, 2014 Instructions This exam consists of six questions. You must answer all questions. If you need an assumption to complete a question, state the assumption clearly and proceed. Be as clear as possible in your answer. You have four hours to complete the exam. If an answer requires complicated mathematical calculations, students will be given full credit if they simply write down the function that could have been typed into a calculator. Important procedural instructions: Be sure to put your assigned letter and no other identifying information on each page of your answer sheets. Also, put the question number and answer page number (e.g. 4.1) at the top of each page. Write on only one side of your paper and the leave at least 1 inch margins on all sides. Make sure your writing is clear and easy to read. Turn in your final copy with all pages in order. GOOD LUCK! 1

1. (15 Points) An agent has preferences on the set of probability distributions on a finite set of prizes Z {z 1,..., z n }. The space of these probability distributions is (Z) and the generic probability function π (π i ) n i=1. The agent s preferences are represented by the utility function that assigns to each π (Z) the value: U(π) = 3 h + kπ n i=1 απ i i, where h, k, α 1,..., α n are positive numbers and Π n i=1α π i i denotes the product α π 1 1 α πn n. (a) What are the axioms that characterize Expected Utility representation of preferences in von Neumann-Morgenstern theorem? Provide a formal statement of each axiom. (b) Which of the EU axioms are satisfied by the preference above? 2. (15 Points) Consider the simple linear model Y i = X i β + u i, i = 1,..., N, where X i is a scaler with E[X i ] = 0 and u i s are random errors with mean zero and finite variance σ 2. (a) Derive an estimator of β. Express its expectation in terms of variance and/or covariance that involve X i. (b) Derive the probabilistic limit of your estimator. State clearly the assumptions needed for your answer. (c) Derive the asymptotic variance of your estimator. (d) Suppose that Y i = log Q i and X i = log P i, where Q and P denote consumption and price of beef respectively. i. Derive the price elasticity in this estimation. ii. How does the elasticity vary with price in this model? iii. Suppose that beef consumption is influenced by the price of chicken, which is a substitute to beef. It is also known that beef and chicken prices tend 2

to move in the same direction. Discuss the consequence on the estimation of own price elasticity due to omitting the price of chicken in this regression. 3. (15 Points) Consider an exchange economy with two consumers and two commodities x and y. Suppose X i = R+. 2 Each consumer has an income of 1. (a) Consumer A s preferences are represented by the utility function u A (x A, y A ) = x α A y A, where α > 0. Draw A s indifference curves. What is A s demand function? Graph his demand for x and y as a function of p. Are A s preferences convex? Monotone? Strictly convex? Strictly monotone? Continuous? (b) Consumer B s preferences are represented by the utility function u B (x B, y B ) = (x B ) 2 + 2(y B ) 2. Draw B s indifference curves. What is B s demand function? Graph his demand for x and y as a function of p. Are B s preferences convex? Monotone? Strictly convex? Strictly monotone? Continuous? (c) Suppose we have an economy with two consumers, both having preferences like consumer A s, and endowment equal to (1, 2). i. Find all the Walrasian equilibria. Is it unique? ii. Find the set of core allocations in the Edgeworth Box. iii. Find the set of fair allocations in the Edgeworth Box. 4. (15 Points) Let Y R L be a production set. (a) State the definition of additivity of a production set. (b) Argue in one paragraph that the production set of a firm in an industry in which there is free entry is always additive. 3

(c) A private ownership economy is a collection of agents N represented by preferences ( i ) i N and firms J = {i,..., j} represented by production sets (Y j ) j J. Agent i N has initial endowment of resources w i R L + and for each firm j J, agent i owns a proportion θ ij of firm j. A competitive equilibrium for the economy is a triple (x (x i ) i N, y (y j ) j J, p (p l ) L l=1 ), where xi R L + is agent i s consumption, y j R L is firm j s production vector, and p is a price vector, that satisfy among other conditions, that for each firm j J, y j maximizes firm j s profits at prices p. Argue that if firm j belongs to an industry in which there is free entry and possibility of inaction, then in any competitive equilibrium firm j s profit is zero. 5. (20 Points) Consider a panel data model Y it = X it β + c i + u it, i = 1,..., N, t = 1,..., T, where E[u it X i1,..., X it, c i ] = 0 and E[c i u it ] = 0 for all i s and t s. Denote by v it = c i + u it and v i = (v i1,..., v it ). Define Σ = E[v i v i]. (a) Propose a feasible generalized least squares estimator (FGLS) that utilizes an estimate of Σ. State the necessary steps to implement your proposed estimator. (b) Let Var(c i ) = σ 2 c. Further assume that Var(u it X i1,..., X it, c i ) = σ 2 u. Propose a FGLS estimator under this additional assumption. State the necessary steps to implement your proposed estimator. (c) Discuss the relative advantages and limitations of the two estimators proposed above. Give your recommendations on how to select between these two estimators. (d) Suppose that N = 500 and T = 10. The results based on your proposed estimators 4

from Part (a) and (b) are considerably different. recommend? Why? Which estimator would you 6. (20 Points) Consider two identical risk neutral firms, i = 1, 2 that produce identical product at a constant marginal cost c > 0. There is a single consumer with unit demand for the good who is known to value the good at v > c. Suppose that the firms simultaneously announce prices p i 0. Upon observing the price, the consumer chooses whether to buy the good from one of the sellers. In case of a price tie, the consumer chooses one of the firms at random. (a) Do the firms have any strictly dominated strategies? (b) Do the firms have any weakly dominated strategies? (c) Solve for the pure strategy Nash equilibrium and argue that this equilibrium is unique. Suppose now that the firms incur cost q (0, v c) to issue a price quote (for instance, a sale person makes a costly phone call to the buyer). The firms simultaneously choose whether to give the buyer a costly price quote and upon observing the quoted prices, the buyer makes her purchasing decision. (d) Is there a pure strategy Nash equilibrium in this game. (e) Consider now a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium, in which each firm gives a price quote with probability α (0, 1). Conditional on making a price offer, each firm prices according to a continuous and atomless cdf F ( ). Explain why in such mixed strategy equilibrium, a firm makes a price offer lower than c + q and higher than v with zero probability. (f) Write the expected payoff of firm i from quoting a price p i given that the other firm adheres to the mixed equilibrium strategy described in part e). (g) Solve for the equilibrium values of F (p) and α assuming that the support of F ( ) is the entire interval [c + q, v]. 5